False Flags Are Just a Conspiracy Theor ... Admitted Fact

George Washington's picture

Presidents, Prime Ministers, Congressmen, Generals, Spooks, Soldiers and Police ADMIT to False Flag Terror

In the following instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admit to it, either orally, in writing, or through photographs or videos:

(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.

(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.

(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and then falsely blamed it on the Nazis.

(6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).

(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.

(11) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.

False flag attacks carried out pursuant to this program include – by way of example only:

(12) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.

(13) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

(14) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

(15) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

(16) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

(17) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

(18) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(19) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.

(20) A declassified 1973 CIA document reveals a program to train foreign police and troops on how to make booby traps, pretending that they were training them on how to investigate terrorist acts:

The Agency maintains liaison in varying degrees with foreign police/security organizations through its field stations ….


[CIA provides training sessions as follows:]


a. Providing trainees with basic knowledge in the uses of commercial and military demolitions and incendiaries as they may be applied in terrorism and industrial sabotage operations.


b. Introducing the trainees to commercially available materials and home laboratory techniques, likely to he used in the manufacture of explosives and incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.


c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target analysis and operational planning that a saboteur or terrorist must employ.


d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques giving practical experience with both manufactured and improvised devices through actual fabrication.




The program provides the trainees with ample opportunity to develop basic familiarity and use proficiently through handling, preparing and applying the various explosive charges, incendiary agents, terrorist devices and sabotage techniques.

(21) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

(22) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

(23) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

(24) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).

(25) In 1993, a bomb in Northern Ireland killed 9 civilians. Official documents from the Royal Ulster Constabulary (i.e. the British government) show that the mastermind of the bombing was a British agent, and that the bombing was designed to inflame sectarian tensions. And see this.

(26) The United States Army’s 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces – updated in 2004 – recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty Wars“. And see this.

(27) Similarly, a CIA “psychological operations” manual prepared by a CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels noted the value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a “martyr” for the cause. The manual was authenticated by the U.S. government. The manual received so much publicity from Associated Press, Washington Post and other news coverage that – during the 1984 presidential debate – President Reagan was confronted with the following question on national television:

At this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista contras whom we are backing, which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring of criminals to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order to create martyrs.

(28) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.

(29) Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).

(30) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.

(31) At the July 2001 G8 Summit in Genoa, Italy, black-clad thugs were videotaped getting out of police cars, and were seen by an Italian MP carrying “iron bars inside the police station”. Subsequently, senior police officials in Genoa subsequently admitted that police planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer at the G8 Summit, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.

(32) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion. The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when it knew Iraq had nothing to do with it.).

(33) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

(34) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

(35) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.

(36) Police outside of a 2003 European Union summit in Greece were filmed planting Molotov cocktails on a peaceful protester.

(37) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

(38) Similarly, in 2005, Professor John Arquilla of the Naval Postgraduate School – a renowned US defense analyst credited with developing the concept of ‘netwar’ – called for western intelligence services to create new “pseudo gang” terrorist groups, as a way of undermining “real” terror networks. According to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Arquilla’s ‘pseudo-gang’ strategy was, Hersh reported, already being implemented by the Pentagon:

“Under Rumsfeld’s new approach, I was told, US military operatives would be permitted to pose abroad as corrupt foreign businessmen seeking to buy contraband items that could be used in nuclear-weapons systems. In some cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with guerrillas or terrorists

The new rules will enable the Special Forces community to set up what it calls ‘action teams’ in the target countries overseas which can be used to find and eliminate terrorist organizations. ‘Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?’ the former high-level intelligence official asked me, referring to the military-led gangs that committed atrocities in the early nineteen-eighties. ‘We founded them and we financed them,’ he said. ‘The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we aren’t going to tell Congress about it.’ A former military officer, who has knowledge of the Pentagon’s commando capabilities, said, ‘We’re going to be riding with the bad boys.’”

(39) United Press International reported in June 2005:

U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

(40) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

(41) Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).

(42) A 2008 US Army special operations field manual recommends that the U.S. military use surrogate non-state groups such as “paramilitary forces, individuals, businesses, foreign political organizations, resistant or insurgent organizations, expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and other social or political ‘undesirables.’” The manual specifically acknowledged that U.S. special operations can involve both counterterrorism and “Terrorism” (as well as “transnational criminal activities, including narco-trafficking, illicit arms-dealing, and illegal financial transactions.”)

(43) The former head of Secret Services and Head of State of Italy (Francesco Cossiga) advised the 2008 minister in charge of the police, on how to deal with protests from teachers and students:

He should do what I did when I was Minister of the Interior … infiltrate the movement with agents provocateurs inclined to do anything …. And after that, with the strength of the gained population consent, … beat them for blood and beat for blood also those teachers that incite them. Especially the teachers. Not the elderly, of course, but the girl teachers yes.

(44) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.

(45) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.

(46) Rioters who discredited the peaceful protests against the swearing in of the Mexican president in 2012 admitted that they were paid 300 pesos each to destroy everything in their path. According to Wikipedia, photos also show the vandals waiting in groups behind police lines prior to the violence.

(47) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.

(48) On November 20, 2014, Mexican agent provocateurs were transported by army vehicles to participate in the 2014 Iguala mass kidnapping protests, as was shown by videos and pictures distributed via social networks.

(49) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.

(50) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

(51) The Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others. Ukrainian officials admit that the Ukrainian snipers fired on both sides, to create maximum chaos.

(52) Burmese government officials admitted that Burma (renamed Myanmar) used false flag attacks against Muslim and Buddhist groups within the country to stir up hatred between the two groups, to prevent democracy from spreading.

(53) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.

(54) U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants

(55) Similarly, police frame innocent people for crimes they didn’t commit. The practice is so well-known that the New York Times noted in 1981:

In police jargon, a throwdown is a weapon planted on a victim.

Newsweek reported in 1999:

Perez, himself a former [Los Angeles Police Department] cop, was caught stealing eight pounds of cocaine from police evidence lockers. After pleading guilty in September, he bargained for a lighter sentence by telling an appalling story of attempted murder and a “throwdown”–police slang for a weapon planted by cops to make a shooting legally justifiable. Perez said he and his partner, Officer Nino Durden, shot an unarmed 18th Street Gang member named Javier Ovando, then planted a semiautomatic rifle on the unconscious suspect and claimed that Ovando had tried to shoot them during a stakeout.

Wikipedia notes:

As part of his plea bargain, Pérez implicated scores of officers from the Rampart Division’s anti-gang unit, describing routinely beating gang members, planting evidence on suspects, falsifying reports and covering up unprovoked shootings.

(As a side note – and while not technically false flag attacks – police have been busted framing innocent people in many other ways, as well.)

(56) A former U.S. intelligence officer recently alleged:

Most terrorists are false flag terrorists or are created by our own security services.

(57) The head and special agent in charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles office said that most terror attacks are committed by the CIA and FBI as false flags. Similarly, the director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom said:

By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.

(audio here).

(58) Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the “benefits” of of false flags to justify their political agenda:

Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler


“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.


“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin

Postscript:  Unmarked Israeli fighter jets and unmarked torpedo boats attacked – and did everything they could to sink – a U.S. ship off the coast of Egypt in 1967 called the USS Liberty.

The attack started by targeting communications on the ship so that the Americans couldn’t radio for help. The Israelis then jammed the ship’s emergency distress channel, and shot at escaping life rafts in an attempt to prevent survivors from escaping.

Transcripts of conversations between the Israeli pilots and Israeli military show that Israel knew it was an American ship.

Numerous top-level American military and intelligence officials – including Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff – believe that this was a failed false flag attack, and that Israel would have attempted to blame Egypt if the Israeli military had succeeded in sinking the ship. Indeed, President Lyndon Johnson dispatched nuclear-armed fighter jets to drop nuclear bombs on Cairo, Egypt.  They were only recalled at the last minute, when Johnson realized that it was the Israelis – and not the Egyptians – who had fired on the Liberty.

The following actions are arguably an admission that Israel intended to frame Egypt for the attack, and didn’t want the Liberty’s crew to be able to tell the world what really happened: (1) using unmarked jets and boats, (2) destroying the Liberty’s communication equipment and jamming the Liberty’s emergency distress channel, and (3) trying to sink the ship and destroy all liferafts.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Constipated Owl's picture

Just finished Dr Judy Woods book, "Where did the Towers" go, it beggars belief that people swallowed the MSM version of events & that no one has rounded up the cabal of criminals involved, it seems like everyone in power is corrupt !

Victory_Garden's picture

Often, we face our selves.

Often, many disagree.

Often, it is the unique that makes life interesting.

Often, diversity is not so chaotic.

Often, the Spirit(comforter) speaks.

Often, chaos controls fear.

Often, we feel aott about the whole enchilada(shit show).

Often, comes a voice that speaks for many.

Often, we learn from paying attention.

Please do.


Here be now to all crew aboard a voice that represents many moar, than many want to even imagine.

May ye all learn to forgive and to learn the lessons of freedom have come to many at great costs.

Often, many forget that.


Elbert Guillory:




PoasterToaster's picture
PoasterToaster (not verified) Feb 4, 2016 1:49 PM

Of all the contributors on this site, it's interesting that George Washington seems to have his own personal lunatic troll that follows him around and does his worst to turn everything into a shit show all about himself.

Iconoclast421's picture

(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson

The word admitted is a hyperlink, which goes to a wikipedia article about Hermann Goering. This is rather shoddy sourcing. I'm not denying it happened, it is just frustrating because I would like this article to be something that I can use as a source and I cant do that unless the links are solid.

EddieLomax's picture

"The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine"

WW2 ended in 1945, whether you believe in the holocaust or not it certainly was not happening after 1945. 

As for the Jews heading to Palestine not being popular with the British, try looking up the Stern gang as an example.  These terrorists were as barbaric as any others such as planting bombs under bodies to kill medics, but are sadly still celebrated as heroes by Israel who gave them medals and even opened up a museum to show their exploits.  I'm not anti-Israeli or anti-Jewish, Israel is the best country in the middle east and I respect that Jewish people want a homeland and got it, but they have a few skeletons in their closet.

Based on their actions, and their widespread support among Jewish settlers in the then Palestine I think the British actions were justified.

wildbad's picture

excellent excellent excelent.  thanks for the compilation GW

Chad_the_short_seller's picture
Chad_the_short_seller (not verified) Feb 4, 2016 12:20 AM

Jews created false flags you dipshit author. 

George Washington's picture


Two-thirds of the City of Rome burned down in a huge fire on July 19, 64
A.D. The Roman people blamed the Emperor Nero for starting the fire.
Some top Roman leaders – including the Roman consul Cassius Dio, as well as historians like Suetonius – agreed that Nero started the fire (based largely on the fact that the Roman Senate had just rejected Nero’s application
to clear 300 acres in Rome so that he could build a palatial complex,
and that the fire allowed him to build his complex). Regardless of who
actually started the fire, Nero – in the face of public opinion accusing
him of arson – falsely blamed the Christians for starting the fire. He then rounded up and brutally tortured and murdered scores of Christians for something they likely didn’t do.

AGuy's picture

"falsely blamed the Christians for starting the fire. He then rounded up and brutally tortured and murdered scores of Christians for something they likely didn’t do."

Well, you can't be sure it was Nero. Nero was unpopular at the time before Rome burned and was already persecuting Christians. The Fire may have been started by Christians to pin it on Nero (about Domus Aurea) in an attempt to get Nero removed. FWIW: I am Not biased either way, as I certainly have nothing good to say about him.


Watch this episode about Nero and the great fire:


"many Roman Christians believed in prophecies predicting that Rome would soon be destroyed by fire. Perhaps the fire was set off by someone hoping to make the prediction come true."

George Washington's picture

That's why I didn't add it to the list. It's not admitted.

Charles Offdensen's picture

Nobody ever really admits to the false flags because you never know who is behind them. I deplore them either way because it is a breakdown of human civilization that doesn't want to live peacefully with one another. Either way no side would ever admit to it UNLESS ITS AN ENEMY POSING YOUR SIDE TRYING TO BE A REMORSEFULL INDIVIDUAL WHICH IS A CROCK.

You never we it on the other side because they are too busy trying to make us look like the instigator rather than a player of the same game.

Regardless we have people in our own government who wish to discredit us by engaging us in the same behavior as the enemy rather than just wiping them out and having honor as it relates to winning by not sneaking around.

However our founders did try to blame the dumping of tea into the harbor on the Indians by dressing up as them to head fake the British but as the good book says there is nothing new under the sun.

The fact that you don't explain this nuance I your posts shows your disingenuinoisness. It's reasons like this that Shitgum suicide hounded you until he was banned from here.

I still talk with him and he still laments the fact he was banned for being truthy. Oh well such is life . He sends his regards by the way.

For the record I tried.

DaveyJones's picture

"Nobody ever really admits to the false flags because you never know who is behind them"

This sentence is actually written backwards from the proposed logic in it.

With your logic then, no criminal defendant could ever be convicted without a confession.

people and countries get "convicted" Just one take a little longer

Charles Offdensen's picture

You and your false flags again as though America invented it! It's been this way through out history. And you never tell the both sides to give the full spectrum of circumstances that face a free country such as ours.

Guess who fothermucker!!!

For the record I tried!

Maybe you should try and be intellectually honest. Or at the very least complete the picture. :-)))))

DaveyJones's picture

"to give the full spectrum of circumstances that face a free country such as ours"

what are you trying to suggest

1) This justifies the crime?

2) The US has no "necessity defense"

3) This isn't a free country

3) freedom is a relative term and its changing rapidly

4) As history shows us, there is nothing "unique" about the US empire. It's burning through its resources, militarizing everything, pissing the world off and now turning on its own laws and its own people just like every other.

George Washington's picture

The list includes Russian flags and Muslim false flags.  It included every false flag - no atter who carried it out - which was admitted.

If you can find additional credible confessions of false flags by America's enemies, I will add them to the list.

Haole's picture

Hi George, thanks always for your work.

Don't know if the Nuttall/Korody case in Canada would be appropriate for your list?   Although there was no "incident" the "preparation" is false flag defined.

Fish Gone Bad's picture

I really like this one:

(40) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

If you EVER want to go to a protest rally, always be in the back and away from any law enforcement carrying weapons.

Charles Offdensen's picture

Hey rotten fish- is this what you call testimony from a "witness"?!?!?!???

"The fighters testified from behind a curtain and their identity is to remain secret. The central witness was “Fighter 102,” an officer in “Masada,” who told the court that “we were sent to counter the disruptions at the separation barrier in Bil’in. It was the first time I was undercover. Two men were arrested, they were Palestinians.”

Top notch my friend. Now go get me an onion bagel with cream cheese. Boy and a cafe latte while you're at it.

Thanks for coming out

SmittyinLA's picture

Makes Goldman Sachs and Heidi Cruz bailing out the Venezuela commie criminal regime seem bizarre huh?

Dragon HAwk's picture

One Eye, do you have these things alphabetized  like in the Movie 2012?

  Aliens in the basement of Area 51, marines shot in the elevators, one guy survives and tells all. and nobody believe him and the .gov is killing him off quietly.  right next to  Oil is made by shale rubbing together under the plants surface, and is in endless supply?

Flying Wombat's picture

Understanding False Flag Operations In Our Time – Richard Dolan on Guns & Butter

Richard Dolan covers false flag operations analyzed as a distinctively modern phenomena, post WWI; the planet being stolen by a transnational corporate financial class; ideological false flags including religions and nationalism; the propaganda spectrum including cultural values, educational system and news media; a war of corporate cultural control and imposition of a global police state; US Psychological Operations Manual; white, grey and black PSYOPs; regime change and color revolutions; NGOs; characteristics of a false flag.


Radical Marijuana's picture

Thanks for link

Flying Wonbat:


One important point that Dolan makes is related to the exponential progress in physical science and technologies, which have resulted in exponential expansion of the ways that civilization operates according to the principles and methods of organized crime, with the pyramidion people in the globalized social systems more and more engaging in "false flag attacks" which were taking place inside the context of all of the various technologies empires could use in order to back up lies with violence becoming millions, then billions, then trillions of times amplified by those technologies ... (IF civilization survives those contradictions, THEN we are headed toward technologies continuing to be magnified by many orders of magnitude, so that their abilities to back up lies with violence would become quadrillions of times greater!)

Richard Dolan argues that such degrees of quantitative differences, such as exist after the realization of globalized electronic communications, etc., amount to qualititive changes, so that the conceptualization of "false flag attacks" in the contemporary world is relatively discontinuous from the previous history of "false flag attacks."


Richard Dolan's term ideological false flag
applies to the demonization of marijuana!

Lumberjack's picture

Just to give you a heds up GW.

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
Wednesday, February 3, 2016
BBA Aviation to Divest Facilities at Six Airports in Landmark Aviation Acquisition

Divestitures Avoid Creating Monopolies or Duopolies for Critical Fueling and Support Services
The Department of Justice announced today that it will require BBA Aviation plc, the parent company of Signature Flight Support, to divest fixed?base operator assets (FBOs) at six U.S. airports in order to proceed with its $2.065 billion acquisition of Landmark Aviation.
The department’s Antitrust Division filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to block the proposed acquisition, and simultaneously filed a proposed settlement that, if approved by the court, would resolve the competitive harm alleged in the lawsuit. The department said that without the required divestitures, the transaction would have created a monopoly for FBO services at three airports and reduced the number of full-service FBO providers from three to two at three others, resulting in higher prices and lower quality of FBO services for consumers.
“The merger would have subjected general aviation customers at six airports to a monopoly or duopoly for critical fueling and support services,” said Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “Higher prices and lower quality services were the likely result. Today’s proposed settlement will ensure that customers at these airports will continue to receive the benefits of vigorous competition.”
FBOs provide fuel and related support services to general aviation customers, which include charter, private and corporate aircraft operators. Signature and Landmark own or operate full-service FBOs at airports throughout the United States. Signature and Landmark are the only two full-service FBOs at Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) in Dulles, Virginia; Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) in Scottsdale, Arizona; and Fresno Yosemite International Airport (FAT) in Fresno, California. Signature and Landmark are two of only three full-service FBOs at Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport (TRM) in Thermal, California; Westchester County Airport (HPN) in White Plains, New York; and Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC) in Anchorage, Alaska. At each of these three airports, the third FBO is much smaller than Signature and Landmark.
Under the terms of the proposed settlement, BBA Aviation must divest Landmark’s FBO assets at each of the six impacted airports to a buyer approved by the Antitrust Division.
BBA Aviation plc is a United Kingdom public limited company headquartered in London. Its subsidiary, Signature Flight Support, a Delaware corporation headquartered in Orlando, Florida, has the world’s largest FBO network and operates approximately 70 FBO facilities in the United States. BBA had worldwide revenues of approximately $2.3 billion in 2014, of which over $900 million were derived from Signature’s U.S. FBO business.
Landmark U.S. Corp LLC and LM U.S. Member LLC (collectively doing business as Landmark Aviation), are Delaware limited liability companies headquartered in Houston and are owned by investment funds managed by the Carlyle Group. Landmark operates approximately 60 FBO facilities in the United States. Landmark had worldwide revenues of over $700 million in 2014, of which over $500 million were derived from its U.S. FBO business.
As required by the Tunney Act, the proposed settlement, along with the department’s competitive impact statement, will be published in the Federal Register. Any person may submit written comments concerning the proposed settlement during a 60-day comment period to James J. Tierney, Chief, Networks & Technology Enforcement Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 450 5th Street, N.W., Suite 7100, Washington, D.C. 20530. At the conclusion of the 60-day comment period, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia may enter the proposed final judgment upon finding that it serves the public interest.
BBA_Landmark CIS (86.52 KB)
BBA_Landmark PFJ (84.97 KB)
BBA_Landmark Hold Separate (105.15 KB)
BBA_Landmark Explanation (26.9 KB)
BBA_Landmark Complaint (115.75 KB)
Antitrust Division
Antitrust (including FTC antitrust)
Updated February 3, 2016


A clip--Fraud Traced to the White House "Carlye Group'

Fraud Traced to the White House

James Baker was uniquely situated to fulfill Cheney’s commission, for among the many hats he wears, he is legal counsel to the Carlyle Group, one of the nation’s largest defense investment firms whose board consists of former high level government officials, including George Bush senior. Baker was also the “hired gun” for George W. Bush’s campaign in Florida, along with Karl Rove. But among the hats he wears, none is more valuable than his ability to become invisible and leave no fingerprints behind. James Baker courts the press and is hailed a statesman; he also serves as the honorary chairman of the James Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University, a think tank that was involved in aiding the George W. Bush presidential transition teams.

Equally intriguing is the fact that Baker has ties with both the Bushes and Ken Lay. Years earlier, in 1993, after Baker stepped down from his stint as Secretary of State, he and Robert A. Mosbacher—Bush senior’s commerce secretary—signed a joint consulting and investing agreement with Enron. The two men began a lucrative career making joint global investments with Enron on natural gas projects. Baker Botts LLC, James Baker’s law firm, flourished in its specialty of international oil and gas counseling.

Since Baker walked in their circles, when he set out to select an energy team to advise the White House, he filled it with leaders of the oil, gas, and power industries. Three appointees stand out: Kenneth Lay from Enron, who was working on the Bush Energy Transition team under Dick Cheney at the time; Chuck Watson, the then Chairman and CEO of Houston’s Dynegy Inc., and Dynegy’s General Counsel and Secretary, Kenneth Randolf. Both firms were deeply involved in illegally manipulating the California energy market at the time and eventually faced criminal investigations.

Chairman of the Board of Dynergy Patrick Wood III----------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.smartmoney.com/barrons/briefingbooks/?page=executives&origin=...
Patrick Wood Chairman of the Board

Held current title since: 2012
Director since: 2012
Officer since: 2012
Age: 50
Mr. Patrick Wood, III, is appointed as the Chairman of the Board of Dynegy Inc. He is serving as the Board's non-executive Chairman and has served as a principal of Wood3 Resources, an energy infrastructure developer, since July 2005. From 2001 until July 2005, Mr. Wood served as chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. From 1995 until 2001, he chaired the Public Utility Commission of Texas. Prior to 1995, Mr. Wood was an attorney with Baker & Botts, a global law firm, and an associate project engineer with Arco Indonesia, an oil and gas company, in Jakarta. Mr. Wood currently also serves on the Boards of Directors of Quanta Services Inc. and SunPower Corp.

Public Utility Commission of Texas
Utilities industry
February 1995 – June 2001 (6 years 5 months)
Renewables & Environment industry
2001 – 2005 (4 years)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Government Agency; Government Administration industry
June 2001 – July 2005 (4 years 2 months)
Wood3 Resources
Renewables & Environment industry
July 2005 – Present (6 years 3 months)
Energy Infrastructure Development.
SunPower Corporation
Public Company; SPWR; Renewables & Environment industry
August 2005 – Present (6 years 2 months)
Quanta Services
Public Company; PWR; Construction industry
May 2006 – Present (5 years 5 months)
Range Fuels, Inc.
Privately Held; Oil & Energy industry
May 2007 – Present (4 years 5 months)
Xtreme Power
Privately Held; Renewables & Environment industry
October 2008 – Present (3 years)
TPI Composites, Inc.
Privately Held; Renewables & Environment industry
January 2009 – Present (2 years 9 months)
First Wind
Renewables & Environment industry
March 2010 – Present (1 year 7 months)

Captain Nukem's picture

You forgot Pearl Harbor. Even now, only a few people know that it was ordered by FDR and carried out by British warplanes.

Also, few people know that the text of the Zimmermann telegram (as "decoded" by British intelligence) was actually dictated by Woodrow Wilson himself, then passed to the British who substituted Wilson's version for the original message. Wilson's version had the Germans offering Mexico the states of Texas, New Mexico and Arizona in exchange for attacking the US to distract them from the war in Europe.

The Dogs of Moar's picture

I wonder what Herr Minister Zimmerman really wrote?  

It has been suggested that he was just passing on Frau Zimmerman's recipe for sauerbraten to George V, who had inherited his guter Geschmack from all his Hanover and  Saxe Coburg antecedents.


Captain Nukem's picture

Woody and FDR died before they had a chance to admit to anything. (And neither one died of natural causes, but that's another story.)

In addition, few people know that the Lusitania was sunk by a bomb placed in the cargo compartment by US Treasury agents, not by a German sub. The Titanic was earlier sunk the same way, in order to eliminate some prominent men who opposed creation of the Fed.

xavi1951's picture


peddling-fiction's picture

<< xavi1951 is a troll, brainwashed or braindead.

<< OUCH! Take me to a safe zone. /lol

xavi1951's picture

I gave myself the first down vote, free for all.........

VWAndy's picture

I like to think of myself as a conspiracy realist. The difference being I am a facts over faiths kinda guy.

Radical Marijuana's picture

http://www.artofwarsuntzu.com/Art of War PDF.pdf

E-book verson of Sun Tzu's Art of War

That presents a complete translation of Sun Tzu on the Art of War as penned by Dr. Lionel Giles from Great Britain. In 1910, Dr. Lionel Giles, a staff member of the Department of Oriental Printed Books and Manuscripts at the British Museum in London, introduced the English-speaking world to an effective translation of Sun Tzu Bing Fa, literally translated as Sun Tzu on War Methods. Lionel Giles published his translation through Luzac and Co. in London and Shanghai under the more commercial title, Sun Tzu on the Art of War.

Page 4, point 18.

All warfare is based on deception.

Page 12, point 19.

19. Thus one who is skillful at keeping the enemy on the move maintains deceitful appearances, according to which the enemy will act. He sacrifices something, that the enemy may snatch at it.

Page 17, point 15 to 20.

15. In war, practice dissimulation, and you will succeed.

19. Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.

Page 35. Chapter XIII.


8. When these five kinds of spy are all at work, none can discover the secret system. This is called “divine manipulation of the threads.” It is the sovereign’s most precious faculty.

14. Hence it is that which none in the whole army are more intimate relations to be maintained than with spies. None should be more liberally rewarded. In no other business should greater secrecy be preserved.

18. Be subtle! be subtle! and use your spies for every kind of business.

27. Hence it is only the enlightened ruler and the wise general who will use the highest intelligence of the army for purposes of spying and thereby they achieve great results.


The Art of War PART 1

That was an hour and a half long documentary The Art of War Sun Tsu. It was another sensationalized for TV type show, but nevertheless, basically interesting material! It splices together the history of Sun Tzu, discussing the battles that he fought, and then reviews things that he wrote down, in context of American military history in Vietnam war, and D-Day invasion, and American civil war, as examples ...

Similarly, of course, there was the Western traditional literature on that topic such as by Clausewitz and Machiavelli... Here is a link to a biased BBC article about Russian wars based on deception, which deliberately ignores that the British Empire was even more so. Indeed, the best of all systems of organized crime during relatively recent times has been the Anglo-American (Zionist) Empire. (Recall that the British Empire was controlled by the Rothschilds, since they captured control over the Bank of England at the end of the Napoleonic Wars, and the international bankers recaptured control over the American government during the previous Century or so.)


"All human history can be portrayed as the history of deception."

Obviously, war was based on deception,
& spies were the most important soldiers.

What is NOT obvious is what happens to
the methods of war, after the weapons
become billions then trillions of times
MORE powerful than previous eras?

Warfare is organized crime on larger scales.

Warriors were organized gangs of robbers.

They needed social organization inside!!!

However, all of their cooperation within
was designed to enable better deception
of the enemies outside of the sovereign.

Everything that used to work, and make sense,
about how to fight, and win wars, went insane,
after the weapons made their 'survival groups'
no longer have sane relationship to victories.

There is nothing surprising about 9/11 being
a false flag deception designed to start wars.

9/11 was merely the most spectacular symbol, so far ...

However, that rush towards some apparent World War III
makes only the most insane kinds of social habit 'sense.'

If the Ancient Chinese had nuclear weapons,
then China might be a radioactive wasteland.

9/11 was done by deceitful spies to trick us.

Unfortunately, it has almost totally worked.

9/11 was nothing new in the methods of war.

The only thing new is the emergence of an
attitude that provoking a World War Three,
that resulted in using nuclear bombs, etc.,
was an acceptable thing to make happen!

Since the art of war was primarily based on deception,
I believe the previous warriors have succeeded too well.

'Warriors' have gotten too good
at deceiving themselves too far!


Similar organized crime principles & methods

apply to class warfare within societies, as to

warfare waged between different societies!





Pickleton's picture

"Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter."


As is typical, it's fairly easy to find half-truths and lies in George's bullshit.  Radio transmission didnt have shit to do with Reagan bombing Libya.  

Reaper's picture

Renewed trust is the sheeple's favorite opiate. They fear to think, because they fear their companions might discover how stupid they know they are.

roadhazard's picture

On ZH Nothing is random.

mayhem_korner's picture



GW's posts are what I'd call 'ZH-lite.'  More like the ad section of the newspaper.

Tzanchan's picture

Uh, so this is news? I thought we all knew almost all of this....Just because you think people are out to get you doesn't mean they aren't. What government has ever not staged events to justify/support it's positions. Of course you leave such overt and direct interventions such as the overthrow of Mossadegh in Iran to install the Shah; the Lincoln Brigades in Russia at their revolution; Bay of pigs; Noriega in Panama; Kuwait, Libya, and the Iraq invasion-- I'm still wondering why Bush Cheney, Condi, Bremer, Wolfowitz, Powell, Rummy and more aren't all in leg irons at the Hague for overthrowing the best friend we ever had to keep the mullahs in check Saddam Al-Tikriti Hussein. USA! USA! USA!

Grandad Grumps's picture

My assumption now is that ANY and ALL acts of terrorism are acts by the Federal government or subversives controlled by the so called secret/globalist government.

How stupid do they think we are? Pretty stupid I guess ... but it is not true. They just live in a bubble and do not have contact with the real intelligence of this nation. It is the intelligence that questions, has the ability to see beyond, and does not serve blindly.

Ms No's picture

I look at it in a similar fasion. First eliminate the likely possibility of a FF.  It's pretty easy these days because it's all completely obvious for the most part and there are not attempted to hid things thoroughly.  Imagine where we would be if they didn't admit to having drills of one kind or another for nearly every damn mass shooting in the US for example?

Now who are the clueless ones here? 

DaveyJones's picture

"Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion."

Although it maybe beyond the scope of this discussion, it seems to be one of the key pillars to understanding 1) what the hell is going on 2) who is actually "in charge," 3) how desperate and down the road this empire has travelled 4) how vital oil is in the world 5) how many government officials are aware of this mass murder 5) the absolute immunity the government bestows upon itself 6) the corruption that comes with that and 7) how every citizen is disposable to the powers that be.

That's not a liberal point of view or conservative or conspiratorial

It's a human point of view

antidisestablishmentarianismishness's picture

I remember when people used to ridicule me for saying that Area 51 and the Bermuda Triangle were used by the government as Meet & Greet locations for welcoming Martians to our planet and then installing them into high public offices.  But now, with all the brilliant minds on ZH, I am treated as the clear thinking genius I really am. 

One-Eyed-Thong's picture

I remember they use to ridicule me for saying the government has hired trolls to post disinformation on the web in order to try to discredit actual info

antidisestablishmentarianismishness's picture

I remember before the government hired me to post shit on ZH people would ridicule me for having green skin and little antennae growing out of my head. But now I'm a highly paid govt agent so who cares.

One-Eyed-Thong's picture
One-Eyed-Thong (not verified) Feb 3, 2016 3:25 PM

I remember they use to ridicule me for saying that you have the same abilities as "Jesus" and can heal people with your hands

One-Eyed-Thong's picture
One-Eyed-Thong (not verified) Feb 3, 2016 3:24 PM

I remember they use to ridicule me for saying that "humans" are a cross-breed of aliens and animals

One-Eyed-Thong's picture
One-Eyed-Thong (not verified) Feb 3, 2016 3:23 PM

I remember they use to ridicule me for saying the government was keeping track of your internet posts and posting the wrong info will get you and your family a one-way ticket to camp FEMA

techpriest's picture

People hve no idea how easy it is to do exactly what you are saying. Here's an example where I did a search on ery comment posted on Zerohedge:


This took me  three months of my spare time for the base software, and six hours to write the comment reader extension. Having done it once, I'm putting together a generic version to cut that time by 90%. Mass tracking is so easy, any motivated ameteur can do it.

Victory_Garden's picture

Thanks for sharing that.

In the land of the free, we actually still think we are free.

Let them who says we are not, come to prove that. As long as the Rule of Law stands, there will be many who will stand for the Rule of Law.

Freedom, bitchez!