Norway Warns Sweden Will Collapse, PM Will Defy Geneva Convention To Protect Border

Tyler Durden's picture

As you might have heard, Sweden has a refugee problem.

We’ve spent quite a bit of time documenting the country’s trials and travails over the course of the last 12 months during which time Sweden has taken on more than 160,000 asylum seekers.

Last month, on the heels of reports from Germany that men of “Arab and North African” origin assaulted women in central Cologne during New Year’s Eve celebrations, Swedish media alleged that police orchestrated a massive coverup designed to keep a string of similar attacks that allegedly occurred at a youth festival in Stockholm’s Kungsträdgården last August from seeing the light of day.

Meanwhile, a 22-year-old refugee center worker was stabbed to death by a Somali migrant at a shelter for asylum seekers and at the Stockholm train station, “gangs” of Moroccan migrant children reportedly spend their days attacking security personnel and accosting women.

Sweden plans to deport some 80,000 of the refugees this year but according to Norwegian PM Erna Solberg, it may be too little too late to keep the country from collapsing. So concerned is Solberg that she's now crafted an emergency law that will allow Norway to refuse asylum seekers at the border in the event “it all breaks down” in Sweden.

"It is a force majeure proposals which we will have in the event that it all breaks down, the power just comes, and all end in Norway because we are at the top and most of Europe. Norway is the end point, is not it,” Solberg said, in an interview with Berlingske whose Tinne Knudsen adds that “the legislation will soon be presented to the Parliament and is expected to meet broad support.”


Here’s how the proposal is being presented by the anti-immigration Swedish online magazine Fria Tider: “Norway is now preparing to denounce the Geneva Convention and to secure the border with Sweden by force - without letting people apply for asylum.”

Norway’s Bar Association says the move would violate the country’s international obligations as well as basic human rights. But Solberg isn’t backing down. “When we make such a proposal, we know that it is quite a big break with how things have been, but we must have some measures that are preparing for the worst case scenarios,” she insists.

Yes, "worst case scenarios," like what Sweden's Foreign Minister Margot Wallström described last October when she said "most people feel that we cannot maintain a system where perhaps 190,000 people will arrive every year – in the long run, our system will collapse." 

Expect other countries to make similar threats as the international order breaks down amid the cascade of Mid-East refugees. Once everyone's borders are closed the question becomes this: will animosity push member states in Merkel's "harmonious" union to the brink of war with one another?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
NidStyles's picture

(((Barbara Spectre)))

 

Europe has no moral obligation to provide welfare to third world deserters.

OrangeJews's picture

Good on them!

 

Someone needs to guard the border to her fridge though!

saratogaprepper's picture

Sounds like an episode of Vikings.

macholatte's picture
“The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.”

-- William Shakespeare, King Henry VI, Part 2

Miles Ahead's picture

I hate to keep saying this, but fuck Sweden.  Free Assange first you fucking meatballs.  Then maybe your karma will change.  Gotdamn NWO whores.

@Nidstyles: Yes they do, morally.  They, after all, created it (the third world).

Richard Chesler's picture

If you like catfights, you'll love viking wars.

 

philipat's picture

@MA You're so right. Sweden used to be such a nice little country (Abba excepted) but fucked itself up on the one hand with politically correct Progressive socialism, and on the other hand with a blind following of Washington policy. Bad combination.

Neil Patrick Harris's picture

Proof that the NWO elites are actually a bunch of f*cking idiots.

Hey let's print unlimited money to hit our inflation target! [gets deflation instead]

Hey let's invade Syria and then let all the refugees in so that we can break down borders and create a 1 world government! [causes jingoist nationalism backlash]

jeff montanye's picture

the chaos that was supposed to stay in the mideast (http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/wes_clark_and_the_neocon_dream/) has proven contagious.

this may not be in the long run interest of israel.

Stainless Steel Rat's picture

<-- The NWO's agenda is to destroy Europe.

<-- The NWO's agenda is the solution part of "problem reaction solution".

Memedada's picture

Have you ever entertained the thought that ”official policy goals” might not be the ”unofficial policy goals”? Deflation is working well for the 0,01%. As long as the absolute majority of counterfeited “money” is handed to their proxies (the FIRE-sector) deflation is wonderful – you can use your free fake “money” to buy real assets (property, PM’s, companies etc.).

And have you noticed that we live in an Apartheid-system with two sets of rules and two very distinct realities: one for the plebs and another for the ownership-class (the real owners – the 0,01%. And not the ‘wanna-be’ capitalists with an indebted small/medium sized ‘private company’ (= owned by the bank)). The first – the plebs – experience “inflation” (the common understanding of the term = not just an increase in money supply. In the latter – and correct – understanding of inflation we’re already experiencing hyperinflation) in the form of prices rising on necessities (food, housing, health-care, education etc.). The plebs are hit on two fronts – falling wages and rising prices. The second – the owners – experience “deflation” in key asset classes (that the owners historically have hoarded: oil, gold, silver, platinum, gas etc. ), but at the same time “inflation” in relation to luxury items (items that only the super-wealthy can afford): gems, yachts, art, luxury properties etc.

The ownership class is doing well in this political and economic climate – their share of the global wealth have increased since the start of the economic crisis (=not a crisis for them).

The London Taxi-driver have made the best quote about what’s going on: “This is not a crisis – this is a robbery”. I agree. Their plans are working exactly as they’ve hoped for (including convincing someone like you that it doesn’t).

 

And the 0,01% loves nationalism (and other forms of bigotry) – it fits with their fascist ideology. It also fits well in their centuries old strategy of dividing and conquering (the majority of ZH-commenters are either unaware  or willing playing an active part in this strategy – lot’s of kicking downwards and lots of racism (and yes, racism is unintelligent/stupid/uninformed) on this forum: FSA, Muslims, blacks, Jews etc. The refugees created by the Wests imperial ambitions in the middle east is – for the 0,01% - just a positive spinoff.

 

 

Farqued Up's picture

Damn right, she's hot. I have no enthrallment with unhealthy looking wormy women. I love bigguns!

Occams_Chainsaw's picture

While she is slobbing you knob you can think of a sheep...a fat hariry sheep.  Seems to be a good trade off.

researchfix's picture

"...and on the other hand with a blind following of Washington policy. Bad combination."

Looking in the Baltic for submarines, while a battleship named Brezinski sits in the US embassy.

But the Swedish woke up, and in time they will articulate themselves.

SuperRay's picture

Send them to the UN. Better yet, send the UN to Somalia

Stuck on Zero's picture

Blow open the doors of the Vatican and let 100,000 "refugees" inside.

NoPension's picture

That's a mighty nice wall around Vatican City.

XuscitizenSweden's picture

That's not fair M_A_

The overwhelming majority of Swedes want these fuckin' freeloaders OUT, but the politicians are fiddlin' with their balls/twats being indecisive & PC.

 

nyse's picture

But do they have free health care, YES or NO?

Ace006's picture

That's the take away point!!

French Bloke's picture

Still don't trust the Norweigian politicians. Anders Brevik had a point when he thought they were selling the country out, even though his measures were classed as extreme (but not by NATO - especially Turkish - standards against Syrians)

peddling-fiction's picture

What many do not realize that dropping out of the Geneva Convention does not only mean border issues, but it also opens a door on atrocities that were common during the First World War.

Does this mean that they are preparing for a nasty war?

The Geneva Conventions extensively defined the basic rights of wartime prisoners (civilians and military personnel); established protections for the wounded; and established protections for the civilians in and around a war-zone. The treaties of 1949 were ratified, in whole or with reservations, by 196 countries. Moreover, the Geneva Convention also defines the rights and protections afforded to non-combatants, yet, because the Geneva Conventions are about people in war, the articles do not address warfare proper—the use of weapons of war—which is the subject of the Hague Conventions (First Hague Conference, 1899; Second Hague Conference 1907), and the bio-chemical warfare Geneva Protocol (Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, 1925).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Conventions

greenskeeper carl's picture

"securing the border by force" and not allowing any asylum seekers into your country is a pretty fucking far cry from "Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare" wouldn't you say? Violating some part that says you have to let so called non combatants and asylum seekers essentially take over your country isn't the same as murdering people.

 

Plus, in the long run, this is actually a good thing for the bearded ones, IMO. Being blocked from those countries all together will keep the long-suffering regular white people who live there from eventually killing them all. If things continue in that direction, it WILL get to that point eventually.

peddling-fiction's picture

@greenskeeper

Norway needs not to withdraw from the Geneva Convention to secure their borders FFS.

Do what Hungary is doing. Or just decree it Obama style.

Are you aware that WWIII is just around the corner?

We will know probably by March.

greenskeeper carl's picture

"We will know probably by March."

 

Funny, I swear i heard that about last march, april, november, etc. Ill believe it when I see it.

peddling-fiction's picture

@Greenskeeper

I hope I am wrong.

Greenskeeper, for someone who reads ZH to believe everything is hunky dory is kinda weird.

What is your take on the Middle East?

Do you think that everybody will leave peacefully, considering that all the economies of the involved parties in Syria are about to meltdown or suffer considerably?

Do you think that China is bluffing about its resolve on the South China Sea?

Mr.BlingBling's picture

And Ukraine, the Baltics, North Korea . . .

The whole planet is a tinderbox.

peddling-fiction's picture

Ukraine would be the second front for Russia if things got out of hand in Syria.

Right out of a military strategy textbook.

Two fronts are more difficult than one.

Tanks are being stored in caves in Norway. Geneva convention out the window FFS.

Finland informed all its military reserve to understand one´s wartime functions and reporting stations.

And they did this publicly (otherwise I would not have shared this), meaning that it was meant to upset the Russians.

greenskeeper carl's picture

"Norway needs not to withdraw from the Geneva Convention to secure their borders FFS."

 

Ya. I know that. That was my point, FFS. And no, I don't ZH to believe everything is hunky dory. Ive been on here for 3 or 4 years and Ive seen many people show up on here and start making predictions after being here a few weeks that never pan out, just like yours. Always strikes me as kinda troll-ish, and I usually cease responding to them in any way, but ill reserve judgement for now.

peddling-fiction's picture

I hear you Greenskeeper. I have been reading ZH since 2010.

There have been a few anxious moments before that have been different.

Maybe you remember when the US was positioning its military hardware off the coast of Syria some years ago?

This is one of those moments because there are 350,000 troops supposedly in Northern Saudi Arabia, coming from Pakistan, Oman, UAE etc and it is not normal to have so many troops participate in an exercise.

In my book that is a pre-invasion build-up.

I could be wrong.

Anyways, I hope I am wrong.

It could also be an outright lie and fear mongering, or a bluff by Saudi Arabia to negotiate.

nuubee's picture

So, if 20% influx from a different culture is enough to make Sweden collapse... What does that say about the near 30% of existing mexican nationals now living in the U.S. ??

NoPension's picture

100 million? Ck your math.

Arnold's picture

FSA.

Check your perception.

ATM's picture

30% of Mexicans live in the US.

nuubee's picture

I said 30% of existing mexican nationals live in the U.S. I did not say that 30% of the U.S. population was mexican. Those are two different things. Word problems were difficult for you?

Farqued Up's picture

Conventions? Drone their asses, give the survivors speedy trials and shoot them. The Geneva Convention was designed for civilized warfare, an oxymoron, that USA abandoned long ago. "Hey Joe, I found another wedding below, which of these drone buttons drops the clusterbomb?" Nuremburg was a farce but necessary justice.

Iam_Silverman's picture

"But do they have free health care, YES or NO?"

 

The answer is a definite NO.  Nothing in life is free.  Someone has to pay for the healthcare they receive.

CuttingEdge's picture

The Swedes are taxed to hell and gone - hence "free" healthcare.

ATM's picture

It's "free" for the towel heads because they only collect benefits and do not contribute towards them. 

It is doubly expensive for the stupid white Swedes who slave away and pay for their own and the benefits and lifestyle of the brown hoard of sexual abusers and murders.

buttmint's picture

...cutting edge et al...many Scandanavians and Euros have bailed on their homelands and relocating to Thailand.

They've had enough of the bullshit in their home countries.

adanata's picture

XuscitizenSweden... hmmmm... dear friend, the politicians are not fiddling... they are simply following orders from their bosses in Basel; destruction and chaos are necessary to distract the Sheeple. Try to keep up...

XuscitizenSweden's picture

Thanks adanata.

I'm very concerned 'cause during the Am. Race Riots of the 1960's, I learned as a 12 year old how to "shoot-to-kill" with a 12 guage shotgun & a .22 long rifle.

I've seen cities burning and even cops being tramped to death by jungle bunnies.

 

No cops available made shoot 1st, worry later, our modus operandi.

 

The Pussies-in-Power better get their act together.

There are alot of legally-held guns here in Sweden; 1.9 million to approx. 3 million adult Swedish Men. 2 to 3 ratio.

 

Grandad Grumps's picture

Yes, ALL refugees should be dropped at the Swiss border and given a boot forward.

I feel for the people, but not those who are using the people as pawns.

Then again, our flat world could be a spaceship that just picked up a new bunch of souls from some planet and is distributing them amongst our current population.

BarkingCat's picture

>>>>

That's not fair M_A_

The overwhelming majority of Swedes want these fuckin' freeloaders OUT, but the politicians are fiddlin' with their balls/twats being indecisive & PC.

<<<<

 

The voting in Sweden says otherwise.

Most people in Poland didn't want it so they voted for a  ationalist government, even though the previous one was also resisting the EU. 

 

This is not a new phenomena for Sweden. There had been immigration from world's shit holes to Sweden for decades. I heard a story in the late 1970s how Sweden used to be a country where people didn't lock their doors. Then they imported a bunch of Turks and crime went up.

 

Ace006's picture

That is the proverbial dash of cold water to the idea that any substantial body of Swedes or other Europeans are unhappy with matters.  All they have had to do over the years is pull the lever for the nationalist startup parties and, voila, about face.  But, NO fucking way.  The vast majority of voters would rather burn themselves with a blowtorch than sully themselves by supporting those filthy "neo-Nazis." Euuw. 

Just tell us who the neo-Nazis are, Beloved Leaders, and we'll vote against them. We can't figure anything out without your help.

TrustbutVerify's picture

What I think is interesting is that by desiring to protect the borders of one's nation, and similar rational points of view, one is labeled "neo-Nazi," and because of this people are afraid to speak out when they hold these views or just refuse themselves the freedom to think such thoughts.  Oddly, in the United States its the left, and the predominant U.S.-based press - mostly leftist - that shouts down these rational points-of-view.  Even more odd, or perhaps not, Europe, as a whole, so often loudly praises those whom shout down the rational views.  The closer we get to emulating Europes multi-decade social and economic implosion the more they like it.  

Now they cook in their own soup.