What Happens When The Market Goes Nowhere For One Year (Hint: Nothing Good)

Tyler Durden's picture

Excerpted from John Hussman's Weekly Market Comment,

The single most important quality that investors can have, at present, is the ability to maintain a historically-informed perspective amid countless voices chanting “this time is different” and arguing that long-term investment returns have no relationship to the price that one pays.

From a long-term, historically-informed investment perspective, the S&P 500 remains obscenely overvalued on valuation measures most closely correlated with actual subsequent market returns (and that have remained tightly correlated with actual market returns even in recent cycles).

...

We expect the market to go nowhere for more than a decade, but to go nowhere in a distressing way that includes steep interim losses. This is really no different than the expectations I expressed at the 2000 and 2007 market peaks, based on similar valuation arithmetic. Of course, in order to get to zero 10-12 year returns, steep interim losses must also be followed by substantial gains. In my view, the best way for investors to achieve strong returns in the S&P 500 over the coming 10-12 years is to wait for the rain, and torrential rain at that.

...

From an intermediate-term perspective, the U.S. equity market continues to trace out an arc that we view as the rounded top-formation of the third speculative bubble in 16 years. The S&P 500 is presently at the same level it set in November 2014, and the broad NYSE composite is at the same level it set in November 2013. I’ve frequently emphasized that, with a few exceptions such as 1987, most market peaks are a process, not an event. While we have to be alert for the potential for steep, vertical losses, a historically-informed understanding of this process demands that investors be patient, and refrain from placing too much faith in what I’ve often called the “fast, furious, prone-to-failure” advances that occasionally clear oversold conditions.

Visualizing this process of top-formation from a historical standpoint provides a useful reminder that even the worst bear market retreats across history were generally preceded by quite an extended period of choppy sideways market action. The following chart was suggested by Bill Hester based on a commentary by Owen Williams. It shows daily S&P 500 data from 1972-1974, 2000-2002, 2007-2009, and the period since late-2014. The version below differs a bit in that it sets the origin to capture the whole top formation, rather than starting from the exact top itself. The chart isn’t intended as a forecast of any sort, but is instead a reminder that the kind of market action we’ve observed over the past year is consistent with what has regularly been observed in other contexts where valuations were extreme and tepid market internals suggested growing risk-aversion among investors. Each instance included a long period of choppy top-formation over which the market was essentially unchanged.

Even if “this time is different,” we don’t expect it will be different enough to sustain valuations at current obscene levels in the absence of favorable market internals. We can’t rule out a fresh shift back to the kind of speculative yield-seeking that dominated investor behavior earlier in this cycle, but we’ll take that cue directly from market internals. In any event, we doubt that fresh speculation would be sustained for long, so any constructive view on that basis would demand a tight safety net. For investors optimistic enough to reject the idea that the market is doomed to suffer extreme valuations and dismal expected returns forever, the completion of this cycle is likely to offer numerous opportunities to act on that optimism, at far higher prospective returns than are currently available.

With respect to the near-term, my views aren’t very pointed here, though as I noted last week, I do believe "tail risk" is increasing. In recent weeks, I’ve maintained a neutral near-term market outlook because of improvement in various trend-following measures, though broad internals still don’t support the view that investors have shifted to the kind of persistent risk-seeking behavior that we observed prior to mid-2014. Last week, there was enough deterioration in momentum measures to chip away at the technical picture, throwing near-term conditions to a somewhat negative outlook, overall. That negative outlook would harden substantially on a break below about 1975 on the S&P 500. Purely as something to monitor, my impression is that any sustained break below the widely-followed 200-day moving average (presently about 2014 simple and 2008 exponential) could contribute to exit attempts by trend-followers. Even here, 56% of individual stocks remain below their own respective 200-day averages.

Regardless of near-term technical factors, however, the most important consideration here is that extreme valuations continue to be joined by relatively poor market internals, which introduces negative skew and a fat left tail into the likely distribution of returns. Put differently, even if short-term market behavior appears relatively stable, one should be prepared for steep losses that may emerge, if history is any guide, seemingly out-of-the-blue.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
JamaicaJim's picture

The problem, John, is that history does not count....

WHEN THE FUCKING FED, BANKS, THE DISTRICT OF CORRUPTION HAVE RIGGED THE ENTIRE SHIT SHOW....

Plus, you have Fuckbama fucking things up for another 9 months, making sure the casino does not tank so he can get his bitch/cunt, Cankley Clinton, installed into the ovarian office (since a pussy has been there for the past 8 years)....

MillionDollarBonus_'s picture

Why panic when the long term trend line underlying the S&P 500 continues to hold? Every experienced investor knows that the trend is your friend, and you would be foolish to sell your stocks under the presumption that they are "overbought" or "overvalued". Let the market dictate whether it is overvalued - as long as it keeps rising, the smart money will continue to buy and reap great rewards, while the permabears sit and sulk on the sidelines, waiting for their moment of vindication that never seems to come.

https://accredited-times.com/2016/04/12/the-science-of-economics-how-eco...

LawsofPhysics's picture

LOL!!!!  Not your best work MDB. Are you suggesting that this "market" is reflecting true price discovery?

FAIL.  Yeah, remove the Fed put and raise rates, or let the fraud be seen for what it is!

 

rccalhoun's picture

you can be 'taxed' by NIRP and ZIRP or you can buy stocks, real estate or art

 

(or can you can buy physical)

LawsofPhysics's picture

Bingo, get physical assets and a dependable tribe because when fraud is the status quo, possession/control of productive assets is the only law that matters.

Mini-Me's picture

In other words, take your chips off the table and leave the casino.

buzzsaw99's picture

the permanently high plateau theory.

financialrealist's picture

Irving Fisher, 15th October 1929.  "Stock prices have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau."  The dow lost 85% of its value from the "permanent plateau"!

Spitzer's picture

Yeah well...

 

Even when we get another epic stock collapse, if people are mentally retarded enough to again use bonds as a safe haven then there can never be a cuurency collapse in the us

hxc's picture

Markets crashed 4 days later. What an idiot Fisher was. Crappy excuse for a monetarist

Temporalist's picture

"Losing money has never been so easy!" (since Lehman)

Infield_Fly's picture
Infield_Fly (not verified) Apr 12, 2016 9:55 AM

CBs just keep on adding to inventory.

 

But they can't hold it...she's breaking up...she's breaking up

JamesNorman's picture

Smart asset allocation back into lower priced emerging technologies.. Rinse Wash Repeat.. Same thing every cycle ;)     http://goo.gl/yQajjH