One Man Asks Why Was Tritium Found At 9/11 Ground Zero

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Shepard Ambellas via Intellihub.com,

Although it’s now public knowledge that former Florida Sen. Bob Graham told the Tampa Bay Times that the secret 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission report are poised to be released within the next few months, one can only question what the White House’s new and urgent motive for their release is.

One thing comes to mind, right off the bat, and that is the fact that strong evidence exists suggesting that up to three thermonuclear devices were detonated at the World Trade Center site on 9/11, hence the nickname “Ground Zero.”

ground zero definition

I mean, what better way than to dupe the people yet once again by slowly conditioning them, over an extended period of time, to accept the fact that criminal factions of their very own government orchestrated the Pearl Harbor-like attack onto skyscrapers, buildings, in an American city.

That’s right, when the not so secret 28 pages are actually released, in a few months, they will likely show Saudi involvement and government foreknowledge, like we already knew.

So tell us something we didn’t know; like the fact that a Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Energy, study found high trace levels of tritium inside the WTC complex after the attack. Not only were abnormal levels of tritium found inside the WTC complex, in the basement of “WTC 6” and the “storm sewer,” but they were also found in the water.

tritium wtc

Study of Traces of Tritium
at the World Trade Center (Oct. 2002)/U.S. Department of Energy

“Tritium is an important component in nuclear weapons. It is used to enhance the efficiency and yield of fission bombs and the fission stages of hydrogen bombs in a process known as “boosting” as well as in external neutron initiators for such weapons,” according Wikipedia; meaning that the only way it would be present in high trace levels is if a nuclear device (or three) detonated within proximity. Additionally it’s important to note that tritium is “extremely rare on Earth” and again — should not be found in at levels reported to be ’55 times higher than normal.’

And just to be clear, I am not saying that micro nukes were solely responsible for bringing down the towers — and IMO were likely only used at the base of Towers 1 and 2 and possible the base of building 7 and were strategically placed 50 feet below street level, somewhere in the basements of the buildings or subway access tunnels. This would also explain numerous eyewitness reports of “large” explosions in the basement or “lobby” of the towers.

It has also been proven that Nano-thermite was used and was present in dust samples, less than 2 microns in diameter, that were taken from the WTC site after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks as pointed out early on by Richard Gage of the grassroots organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Moreover there are also signs that advanced barometric bomb technology, which uses triggering devices derived from the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Program, was also deployed in the attack — technology which incorporates gaseous elements in a “yellowish, brownish combustible mixture” and uses Aluminum Silicate Red Oxide and other ingredients” that would have surrounded and permeated the air around key structural columns on all floors before being triggered by a “specific high-voltage pattern” which the element combination is responsive to.

One bomb specialist, who wanted to remain anonymous for obvious reasons, can be seen in the proceeding video, testifying to the existence of such technology and said:

“[The high-voltage pattern] produces sort of a stairway pattern in the molecular structure of the cloud. Part of that pattern is a hydro-dynamic power generator, energy source, permeating the cloud which is then energized with another energy source and then is detonated. This causes the cloud itself to explode in such a fashion that if the cloud is circulating around the pillar — then it crushes the pillar from all sides and turns that pillar literally to dust and leaves only the rebar behind. So if you’ve got this cloud permeating all the way around the first floor, wherever it is, anything within its path gets crushed, imploded, to dust instantaneously. And when that happens of course there is nothing left to hold up the upper floors above, so bang, they come down like a pancake.”

This also explains why an eyewitness by the name of Kenneth Summers, who was in the lobby of tower 2 at the time, actually saw such a gas-like substance mixing with the air just a “tenth of a second” before the witness was blown back out the lobby doors. Kenneth Summers told NBC what he saw just before being eject from the lobby by a massive explosion and stated:

“All of a sudden it seems like the whole lobby, the door I was in, filled up with a yellowish, brownish, combustible mixture. It didn’t really smell any different, but was so quick to happen, it was like a tenth of a second.”

Summers testimony starts at 5:08 into the following video:

Look, all I know is the actual impact from the alleged passenger planes did not cause the collapse of the WTC’s towers 1 and 2 that stood proud above the New York skyline, nor did the jet fuel fires or random fires burning throughout the buildings. In fact we can clearly see that this was not the case, because the tops of the buildings actually started to collapse first, dustifying themselves in mid-air as reported by Dr. Judy Wood who conducted an independent investigation.

Micro-nukes exist and have for a long time

According to Wikipedia:

The Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM) was a family of man-portable nuclear weapons fielded by the US military in the 1960s, but never used in actual combat. The US Army planned to use the weapons in Europe in the event of a Soviet invasion. US Army Engineers would use the weapon to irradiate, destroy, and deny key routes of communication through limited terrain such as the Fulda Gap. Troops were trained to parachute into Soviet occupied western Europe with the SADM and destroy power plants, bridges, and dams.

 

The project, which involved a small nuclear weapon, was designed to allow one person to parachute from any type of aircraft carrying the weapon package and place it in a harbor or other strategic location that could be accessed from the sea. Another parachutist without a weapon package would follow the first to provide support as needed.

 

The two-person team would place the weapon package in the target location, set the timer, and swim out into the ocean where they would be retrieved by a submarine or a high-speed surface water craft.

 

In the 1950s and 1960s, the United States developed several different types of lightweight nuclear devices. The main one was the W54, a cylinder 40 by 60 cm (about 16 by 24 inches) that weighed 68 kg (150 lbs). It was fired by a mechanical timer and had a variable yield equivalent to between 10 tons and 1 kiloton of TNT. The W54 nuclear device was used in the Davy Crockett Weapon System.

Now do I have your undivided attention?

On 9/11 there is no doubt that multiple bombs were detonated inside the WTC complex — this fact can not be disputed and is clearly documented in hundreds of videos and backed up by many eyewitness testimonies, including highly credible first responders and firefighters. In fact, seismic readings from that day indicate that at least 3 large man-made explosions, possibly nuclear by signature, took place underground inside the WTC complex. Could these be the actual blasts that took out the cores of buildings 1, 2 and 7? Is this what the U.S. government has been hiding all along?

Interestingly, previous tests have been conducted by factions of the U.S. government in which they used micro-nukes to demolish rather large buildings and the results were astonishing to say the least, almost a perfect mirror of the collapse of buildings 1, 2, and 7 that took place in Sept. of 2001.

The use of micro-nukes in the WTC complex on 9/11 – the smoking gun

It’s safe to say that high energy releases have a distinct look.

Dr. Ed Ward has documented what he believes is the use of micro-nukes on the World Trade Center complex attack that took place in September of 2001.

One of the smoking guns in this case is that over 5.3 billion pounds of steel was instantly turned into 2 billion pounds of dust, but that’s not all — massive steel beams were bent like pretzels as the towers collapsed.

One video shows the penthouse on building 7 being demolished on the roof just before the building comes down. This proves that a top-down demolition process was being utilized, otherwise the buildings might have just twisted and naturally would have just fell over themselves. But perhaps the most startling revelation that nuclear devices were used is the fact that vehicles that were found up to a half mile away from the WTC looked incinerated — not to mention the tens of thousands of tiny body parts that were found on the rooftops of neighboring buildings which is not indicative at all of a gravitational collapse.

The fact that many of the first responders are now dead, if not very sick, does not sound like the byproduct of a falling building, but rather sounds more like they got a massive dose of deadly radiation. Most of the responders have died of blood cancer and Thyroid cancer, consistent with heavy radiation exposure.

Other red flags include:

  • Cars not hit by falling debris yet totally destroyed far away from the towers
  • Molten metal was seen in and around the debris of the WTC for months, indicative of nuclear fission.
  • There is also the fact that the debris field was substantially low for the magnitude of buildings that were destroyed, thus signifying that most of the debris was incinerated upon the demo blast.
  • Massive craters under the WTC complex were formed, likely from the detonation of micro-nukes, as the rock was even melted smooth. Later after the site was fairly cleaned up and the craters were excavated, the city of New York Port Authority continued to wash down the cavities with hoses daily for years as traces of Tritium were found, signifying that radiation was present.

Additionally the fact that the WTC buildings were pulverized into a fine dust cannot be ignored. This is a tell-tale sign of a high energy release typical of a nuclear explosion. Eyewitness accounts and personal testimony indicate that people were thrown an entire city block from what was described as a warm wind just as the towers begin to collapse.

There were also multiple reports of “hanging skin” or “melted skin” on victims around ground zero. This was a common occurrence in the Hiroshima blast. Major hot spots were also reported in and around the debris at the World Trade Center complex and were prevalent for up to six months after the attacks. This type of activity, seen with the hot spots, is commonly referred to as “China Syndrome”, where nuclear material will continue to undergo fission for a period of time, generating massive heat plumes.

To no surprise, videos obtained via Freedom of Information ACT (FOIA) requests, captured on and after Sept. 11, 2001 near the WTC site, have had sections, clips, of the video and audio removed, especially during the beginning of the collapse of the towers. However, the explosions can be heard on many independent videos, now floating around the web and can all be accounted for.

Not to mention the hijackers, some of which have still been proven to be alive, were recruited by the CIA, as can be seen in the following video:

 

The truth is out there.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
DownWithYogaPants's picture

A bit much to swallow.  It seems much more likely that jet fuel weakened the structure and then floors pancaked one onto another bringing it all down.  ( I'm an engineer ...please refrain from nut quackery )

.....now if the gov had something to do with that is another question altogether and worth asking.

NuckingFuts's picture

one-man-asks-why-was-tritium-found-911-ground-zero

Ummm... Because the fucking neo-cons desperately wanted a war and this was the easiest way. It wasn't because they hate us for our freedom.

skinwalker's picture

Anyone who questions the official story is a traitor, crackpot, and obviously hates the troops, apple pie, and the american way. Believe your all wise gov't or the terrorists win!

 

/sarc, but I have family that's said this to me, pretty much word for word. 

TeamDepends's picture

Tritium? That's easy, the zionistas rub a little bit on their insurance documents for good luck.

0b1knob's picture

And another man (me) asks where is the cesium, strontium, iodine and other radioisotopes formed by fission bombs found?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re72di5phM0

 

Deathrips's picture

Check out this video.

Thanks Sean from SGT.

 

http://sgtreport.com/2015/09/911-methodical-deception-rebekah-roth/

 

Then you engineers can tell me what temp concrete melts at.

http://911smokinggun.blogspot.com/2010/02/blog-post.html

 

RIPS

NidStyles's picture

(((Eyewitness testimony is inadmissible goys, unless it's Jewish eyewitness of the holocaust.)))

nuubee's picture

Goddamn truthers. You can be an engineer and disbelieve these ridiculous theories and still dislike the warmongering of our elites. Stop spreading BS.

FMR Bankster's picture

Well, could be the beta lights used in the exit signs but I guess that's not as interesting a story.

Ignatius's picture

How it was done exactly, is not the story.

Who and why are the story.

Pinto Currency's picture

 

 

True.  Who is the question.

But also consider directed energy weapons.

class of 68's picture

Pinto,

Dr. Judy Wood lots of credible evidence. questions that lead to particle beams. "weapons so sophisticated, we have no idea the scope"

former seal to me... we have a weapon so great that.... "we can stack paper bags around the entire border of Iran. then kill everyone inside Iran and all the bags are left standing"   He wasn't laughing, I wasn't laughing. no hyperbole. 

bluskyes's picture

Didn't that happen to the eiffel tower in one of the Pink Panther movies?

beemasters's picture

"It seems much more likely that jet fuel weakened the structure and then floors pancaked one onto another bringing it all down. ( I'm an engineer ...please refrain from nut quackery )"- DownWithYogaPants

You maybe right only if there was a uniform structural weakening throughout an entire floor all AT THE SAME TIME. This wasn't the case and impossible due to the specific impacts of the planes on the buildings and thus also the uneven distribution of the jet fuel (if you believe jet fuel was able to cut through the structure and in such a short span of time).
What engineer are you? Sound engineer? Or perhaps Yoga Pants Fabric Engineer?

Four chan's picture

only a fucking moron could ignore this was a demolition^  either muslims did it and are evil pieces of shit, or it was done by those who benefitted, the jews, who own the towers, and everything to do with war, including lending to the government to put on the show at usurious interest of course.  the older i get the more the jew and the arab look like the same treacherous fucks.

I-Engineer's picture

This tritium thing is the dumbest idea yet. I am not saying this wasn't an inside job, it probably was. However, these are trace levels and 55 times increase of fuck-all is still fuck-all. I probably piss this much tritium a week working at a heavy water moderated reactor. Do you know what uses tritum? Self-powered emergency exit lights. Even a few of these lights could explain this increase... morons.

XuscitizenSweden's picture

I wrote here at ZH a few days ago about:

Swedish ASEA-ATOM Mini Nuclear Reactors at WTC.

I'm not an expert, however, there is information on the net.

Rumor has it that up to 9 mini atomic reactors were placed in the basement of the WTC; Emergency Reserve Power Plants.

I have also 'toured' the 1st experimental/research 'Swedish Atomic Nuclear Reactor' site at KTH, from the late 1950's to ca 1970.

It's still a secret-no go-restricted- unmarked area ca 30-40 meters underground.

The reactor core itself was approx 2½ meters X 2½ meters / 7.5 feet X 7.5 feet .....it was tiny!!!

 

READ:

*Safe Nuclear Reactors*

New York Times  Published: October 4, 1983

"A radically new reactor design intended to be so foolproof that no special safety features are needed is being proposed by a Swedish concern that sells nuclear reactors.

A key element of the design is a pressure vessel 207 feet high - so massive that, its proponents believe, no conceivable accident could breach it.

No fittings would penetrate its heavily reinforced concrete walls and stainless steel liner. To avoid any possibility of leakage it would only be open at the top.

The reactor core would be...... ".

http://www.nytimes.com/1983/10/04/science/science-watch-207024.html

 

*ASEA-ATOM BWR. development and core performance experience*

Authors:

Bernander, O. ; Haga, I. ; Segerberg, F.  Publication Date: 1972-01-01

"BS>From international nuclear industries fair; Basel, Switzerland (16 Oct 1972). Although the present status of the boiling water reactor is one of proven technology, design refinements and technical innovations are still being made to further improve reliability, economy and safety. The new standard ASEA- ATOM BWR features a number of such refinements and design improvements involving main circulation punips, containment design, refuelling system and off-gas treatment plant. In some respects the nuclear and hydraulic design of the ASEA- ATOM BWR differs from that adopted by other BWR manufacturers. Since the Oskarshamn I plant was the first nuclear power station having these features an extensive physics and hydraulics test program was made during the reactor start- up. The results of these tests have fully confirmed the ability of calculation methods to predict the behavior of the reactor. (auth)  ".

http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/4343822

*Incontrovertible Proof that the WTC was destroyed by
Underground Nuclear Explosions
*
"...Numerous reports of the discovery of molten steel weeks later, along with video proof,
give further witness to this phenomenon.

In the aftermath of the collapse, a team of scientists from the

US Geological Survey

collected samples of dust from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan where it had come to rest
from the enormous pyroclastic dust cloud that enveloped the city.

In the dust, they found high levels of chemical elements that had no business being there.

Extremely rare and toxic elements.

Some of them elements that only exist in Radioactive Form.

Elements such as

Strontium, Barium, Thorium, Cerium, Lanthanum and
Yttrium.

The concentrations of these rare elements in the dust samples were related to each other
by significant mathematical relationships.

Although these elements discovered in high quantities are very rare in the general
environment, one well known situation occurs in which they are very common. In fact, the
elements discovered form a distinctive signature and hallmark of a certain well known
chemical process......

"
http://www.nucleardemolition.com/
AND
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=asea+reactor+WTC+new+york
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ASEA-ATOM+BWR
clymer's picture

How about a link next time instead of a dissertation. All I have to see is a 7 second clip of building 7 to establish foreknowledge and planning. Couple that with a stand down and you have something seriously rotten in Denmark. Like there always has been. Like there always will be

WordSmith2013's picture

9/11 TRUTH GOES NUCLEAR: Massive Download In Progress

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=7858

 

"Russia Disseminates,
Snowden Validates,
NSA Evidence Corroborates
New 9/11 Data Dump"

 

 

Manthong's picture

One need do nothing more but look to Yugoslavia, MENA and Ukraine to understand that human life is but a commodity to the Psychopath Powers That Be.

Sturm und Drang's picture

Yeah, well, mortality is universal amongst the specie.

 

You (the collective, not the specific) do the math.

LieEnforcementOfficer's picture

Why were the building craters super hot for weeks after 9/11?

XuscitizenSweden's picture

I "came across" this information about the Swedish Atomic Reactors on ARTO LAURI'S Youtube Channel.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcHGmrAdzRFgXkeYDhySOEQ

In one of the clips, Arto & another Finn discuss and draw diagrams with the placement of the reactors at the WTC.

They speak Finnish and provide rudimentary english sub-titles, unfortunately.

However, this 'revalation' was very descriptive which I deemed credible.

 

Considering Finnish is my 4th language, I understand most of what is said.

*Rusty Shorts* who posts here at ZH, is the one that mentioned one of Arto Lauri's videos.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=arto+lauri+finland+atom&iac=1

DownWithYogaPants's picture

Too many of you are quite clearly not engineers and appear to very much be attempting to complicate what does not need to be complicated.

All your conspiracy theories can be true without "controlled demolitions" or "tritium".   All that was required was a huge amount of jet fuel that is a LIQUID and thus travels throughout the floor, burns and weakens the steel because of temperature.   

You guys and your Rube Goldbergs

Lorca's Novena's picture

Why cant you see? How do you account for over half of the construction material "vanishing" from a building collapse? The initial impact of the planes ignited all of the fuel onboard in the section of the building where it hit. Of course fire spreads and ignited office furniture, papers, carpets, etc... Nobody denies there was a fire. I must have seen the video of the first tower collapse over a hundred times, and I still cannot wrap my head around the fact the TOP of the building just above where the plane hit 'fell off' first and the it just frikkin vaporized into nothing as the rest of the tower fell down.

I work with steel beams and columns here and ther in home construction, there is no god damn way a flash fire of jet fuel will melt these things. Maybe, a big maybe it would weaken them and lose some structural integerity, but for christs sake it would never ever melt a steel beam.

I can see how the theory of pancaking would be plausible, but the minute you see the top of the tower disintegrate before it hits anything throws that theory out the window.

Im sorry man, i like your posts, but I think you need to use your hread on this and look at what occured. It took me a couple of years to overcome the whole "teh gubbmint would nevar do dis crap"

Four chan's picture

steel melts at 2500 degrees, this is the one fact that smashes that jet fuel theory in the face with a brick.

tricorn teacup's picture

And steel looses most of it's strength at far below melting temperature.  First hand experience as a novice blacksmith.  In addition, jet fuel would not be the only combustable involved.

DownWithYogaPants's picture

These comments devolved into an episode of "The X Files" .........where you want to believe.

FYI: Little physics lesson -- barring matter anti matter reactions matter is neither created or destroyed.  Thus the building materials at the World Trade Center were conserved.  They may have changed form but they did not dissappear 

Creeps's picture

Here's a picture of what appears to be a woman standing at the point of impact where the temps should be in the 1000s of degrees. 

 

https://imgur.com/3bGZ9Lg

XuscitizenSweden's picture

FOUND IT !!!!

Start with this.

Here at 15:02

*Arto Lauri 95. WTC F-4 * January 26, 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--BpxWdnHi0

Rusty Shorts's picture

Yes Arto is a Finnish nuclear engineer with over 30 years experience with nuclear reactors.

XuscitizenSweden's picture

Hello, Hello Rusty S_ !!!

Thanks for showing up.

;)

What I had posted about Arto & the ASEA reactors was "started" by one of your postings.

chuckle....chuckle.

That was late last year if I remember correctly.

What I do remember is I did more research and understood that the information that was available, was NOT in English in a "quick & understandable form".

So I didn't purse it.

However, my own experience, standing in / on the "red numbered blocked sanitized reactor core" made me understand that these mini atomic reactors ARE very small.

Therefore easy to conceal.

Anyway,

If you have something to add, please do.

Regards X-

 

Rusty Shorts's picture

Hey there, you are correct about those mini nuclear power plants, I saw were Japan (of all places) had developed a miniture version nuclear power plant for household use, a sealed mini power plant for each house that would last a lifetime without servicing. I can't find the link now but here is something similar.

 

http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news-toshiba-micro-nucle...

XuscitizenSweden's picture

Great!

Have a Good Sunday.

;) & :)  X-

All Risk No Reward's picture

An engineer whose mind doesn't cower from an uncomfortable reality will know that for each and every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

In the case of the WTC towers, if the top section of the building fell and "hit" the lower section of the building, that "hit" would be registered as a deceleration (upward reaction force to the downward "hit").

THE OBSERVATION THAT DAY WAS OF CONSTANT ACCELERATION INTO AND THROUGH THE BUILDING.

What a Gravity-Driven Demolition Looks Like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiHeCjZlkr8

This is absolute, incontrovertible PROOF that the top section of the building COULD NOT HAVE FALLEN ONTO THE LOWER SECTION OF THE BUILDING AND CRUSHED IT (BECAUSE IT NEVER ACTUALLY "HIT" IT AS EVIDENCED BY THE COMPLETE LACK OF A RESPONSE FORCE DECELERATING THE TOP SECTION OF THE BUILDING!).

This is Physics 101 - and it is why the 911 Commission ended the scope of their investigation at the point of the beginning of the collapse. If they didn't end their investigation at that point, they would've had to address this issue - which is IMPOSSIBLE GIVEN THE PHONY NARRATIVE.

Now, for all you non engineering types (I'm an engineer as well - and wish my fellow engineers weren't so susceptible to Orwellian Crimestop like everyone else), when you play pool, you feel the moment you strike the cue ball with the cue stick, right? That's because your cue stick decelerates as it strikes the cue ball. when the cue ball strikes another ball, the cue ball decelerates. This effect is especially obvious when striking a ball center of mass. Do it. Let me tell you what won't happen ever. The cue ball will not avoid the deceleration of "hitting" the ball it strikes.

This is Orwell's 2+2=4 moment, but most people simply refuse to accept the obvious observable facts. That's Orwellian Crimestop at play in a real world scenario.

I don't know what they did, but I know who my prime suspects are - THE DEBT-MONEY MONOPOLISTS (DMMs).

They finance and control the Israel government and Mossad. They finance and control the British government and MI6 and MI5. They finance and control the US government and the CIA and FBI. The current Saudi government is a close friend of the DMM, if not directly controlled by them.

This BIG.

The MONEY POWER is nothing IF NOT **BIG**.

The fact most people don't know they exist is an effect of their raw POWER to control the perception of the masses.

Dame Ednas Possum's picture

I am a profesionally certified civil engineer with 23 years designing, building and maintaining civil structures. I employ a team of 250 engineers of various disciplines. I also have a brain and I have researched widely the global banking cartel, the criminality f which is as certain as the controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2 & 7... and the absence of a civilian plan at the Pentagon and in Shankesville, Virginia.

The statements above by 'All Risk No Reward' are 100% aligned with my own beliefs and should similarly align with the beliefs of every rational, intelligent adult without an agenda.

'Yoga pants' explanation is utter bullshit.

centerline's picture

What a surprise find you here.  So, how many of your engineer colleagues actually worked the 9/11 site on USAR teams?  Boots on the ground at ground zero?  The sort of folks, like me, who have extensive special training in structural collapse.

WTC 1 and 2 have all hallmarks of progressive collapse and significant sections of core remained standing on site and had to be carefully demo'd (after the fact, that is).  WTC7 on the other hand... now that one looks like a demo job from the get go.  So, "rationale" thought here is to seperate this out.  And the avoid the ridiculous act of turning what we know is a conspiracy into a circus of microconspiracies. 

Bendromeda Strain's picture

I would say the same about you, except modified. What a surprise NOT to find you here, spouting off with authority. Hallmarks, my ass. NIST has been roundly punked, whether it is temperature, audible evidence of explosion, or visual evidence of molten steel. You look like a fool to come around here beating your chest. 

centerline's picture

Based your post below, I wont waste my time with you except to say that "yes" some of us have more authority over the subject matter.  Similar to me not purporting to understand enough of complex banking or microbiology or other fields of study.  Science... dude.  We dont make shit up.  Scienitific process.  Occams Razor usually applies.

Bendromeda Strain's picture

Don't argue with me then, argue with Gage. Did you even watch his presentation? I find him (and cohorts) more than plausible, and he has the bonafides that you cannot prove up here.

Sturm und Drang's picture

So, you were on the Mossad team that set this up then?

"Science... dude.  We dont [sic] make shit up."

Dooood - are you fucking shitting me? Seriously? Making shit up is the hallmark of a whole lot of modern "science".

centerline's picture

Must be an english major.  Ad-hominem attack is a nice touch, by the way. 

Four chan's picture

if one is a demolition then they all were, there occam's razor for you.

centerline's picture

or none were.  or perhaps the concept of rigging one building is easier than rigging three.  remember that occam's razor leans towards the path of least complexity per se.

All Risk No Reward's picture

Newton's 3rd Law kicks Occam's *ss and exposes you as either a tool or a fraud.

What a Gravity-Driven Demolition Looks Like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiHeCjZlkr8

9/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s

Newton vs. NIST
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tejFUDlV81w

I provide data and logic and you avoid it like Dracula avoids light.

Why?

Sturm und Drang's picture

Ad-hominem [sic]? I was speaking to your claim of expertise, which, if you were in on the planning of 9/11, would certainly give you some.

I liked the "english major". Lacking the nuance though.

All Risk No Reward's picture

The attack is factual... and YOU are the one that ignored the reason this sub thread exists...

What a Gravity-Driven Demolition Looks Like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiHeCjZlkr8

Do you always avoid foundational arguments or just when you know you can't put together a reasonable answer explaining your parroting in the face of 100% certain contradiction to your parroting?

You are arguing that it is possible to accelerate a cue stick into a cue ball without the cue stick decelerating as contact with the cue ball is made - but you either aren't honest or sophisticated enough to know this fact or you are a deceiver who avoids detailed claims supported by evidence because you know you can't rationally respond to the fact based claims.

Here's more... and I pound evidence BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE BACKS UP MY CLAIMS... YOU AVOID THE EVIDENCE BECAUSE...

9/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s

Newton vs. NIST
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tejFUDlV81w

All Risk No Reward's picture

centerline, anyone can understand the contradiction to you parrot of the the Debt-Money Monopolist financed false narrative.

Of course, you know that, which is why you won't explain this...

What a Gravity-Driven Demolition Looks Like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiHeCjZlkr8

or

9/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YRUso7Nf3s

This is the SMOKING GUN. Of course, you didn't address it even though it was the main post in this sub-thread.

You will ignore it here as well - that's my bet. You can't explain the lack of deceleration as the top section of the building literally fell through the lower section of the building without ever hitting it.

We no there was no "hit" because a "hit" force down would create and equal and opposite force up... and that upward force would be observable as a deceleration THAT NEVER OCCURRED.

Therefore, there was no hit.

Obfuscate away... but when you do, the fact you are complete and utter tool is not lost on people familiar with Newton's 3rd Law.

Newton's 3rd Law crushes Occam's Razor to bits.