Saudi King And Princes Blackmail The U.S. Government: What Happens Next

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Eric Zuesse, author of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Saudi King & Princes Blackmail U.S. Government

Saudi Arabia, owned by the Saud family, are telling the U.S. Government, they’ll wreck the U.S. economy, if a bill in the U.S. Congress that would remove the unique and exclusive immunity the royal owners of that country enjoy in the United States, against their being prosecuted for their having financed the 9/11 attacks, passes in Congress, and becomes U.S. law.

As has been well documented even in sworn U.S. court testimony, and as even the pro-Saudi former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton acknowledged privately, "Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.” She didn’t name any of those “donors” names, but the former bagman for Osama bin Laden, who had personally collected all of the million-dollar+ donations (all in cash) to Al Qaeda, did, and he named all of the senior Saud princes and their major business-associates; and, he said, "without the money of the — of the Saudi you will have nothing.” So, both before 9/11, and (according to Hillary Clinton) since, those were the people who were paying virtually all of the salaries of the 19 hijackers — even of the four who weren’t Saudi citizens. Here’s that part of the bagman’s testimony about how crucial those donations were:

Q: To clarify, you’re saying that the al-Qaeda members received salaries?

A: They do, absolutely.

So: being a jihadist isn’t merely a calling; it’s also a job, as is the case for the average mercenary (for whom it doesn’t also have to be a calling). The payoff for that job, during the jihadist’s life, is the pay. The bagman explained that the Saud family’s royals pay well for this service to their fundamentalist-Sunni faith. Another lifetime-payoff to the jihadists is that, in their fundamentalist-Sunni culture, the killing of ‘infidels’ is a holy duty, and they die as martyrs. Thus, the jihadist’s payoff in the (mythological) afterlife is plenty of virgins to deflower etc. But, the payers (the people who organize it, and who make it all possible) are the Saud family princes, and their business associates — and, in the case of the other jihadist organizations, is also those other Arabic royal families (the owners of Qater, UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman). However, 9/11 was virtually entirely a Saudi affair, according to Al Qaeda’s bagman (who ought to know).

The report of the threat by the Saud family comes in veiled form in an April 15th news-story in The New York Times, headlined, “Saudi Arabia Warns of Economic Fallout if Congress Passes 9/11 Bill.” It says that the Saud family’s Foreign Minister is “telling [U.S.] lawmakers that Saudi Arabia would be forced to sell up to $750 billion in [U.S.] treasury securities and other assets in the United States before they could be in danger of being frozen by American courts.” The NYT says that this threat is nothing to take seriously, “But the threat is another sign of the escalating tensions between Saudi Arabia and the United States.” While the carrying-out of this threat would be extremely damaging to the Saud family, the NYT ignores the size of the threat to the Sauds if their 9/11 immunity were removed — which could be far bigger. Consequently, this matter is actually quite a bit more than just “another sign of the escalating tensions between Saudi Arabia and the United States.”

Russian Television is more direct here: “Saudi Arabia appears to be blackmailing the US, saying it would sell off American assets worth a 12-digit figure sum in dollars if Congress passes a bill allowing the Saudi Government to be held responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks.” (The Saudi Government is owned by the Saud family; so, even that statement is actually a veiled way of referring to the possibility that members of the royal Saud family — the individuals name by the bagman — could be held responsible for 9/11.) 

Even immediately in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, there had been some mentions in the U.S. press of the U.S. Government making special allowances for Saud Prince Bandar al-Saud, a close friend of the Bush family (and he was also one of the Saudi Princes mentioned specifically by the bagman), to fly out of the country to avoid being sought by prosecutors. Furthermore, Newsweek’s investigative journalist, Michael Isikoff, headlined on 12 January 2001, “The Saudi Money Trail”, and he reported statements from royal Sauds, that they didn’t really mean for their donations to be going to such a thing as this. (Perhaps those individuals didn’t, but Bandar almost certainly did, because he was the Saud Ambassador to the U.S. at the time of 9/11.) However, now that the U.S. Government is relying heavily upon Saudi money to pay for the U.S. weapons and to help to organize the operation to overthrow Bashar al-Assad in Syria and to replace him with a fundamentalist-Sunni leader, there is renewed political pressure in the United States (from the victim-families, if no one else), for the arch-criminals behind the 9/11 attacks to be brought to American justice. After fifteen years, this process might finally start. That would be a drastic change.

Clearly, the threat from the Sauds is real, and the royal response to this bill in the U.S. Congress reflects a very great fear the owners of Saudi Arabia have, regarding the possible removal of their U.S. immunity, after 15 years. 

Prosecution of those people will become gradually impossible as they die off. But a lot more time will be needed in order for all of the major funders of that attack to die natural deaths and thus become immune for a natural reason — the immunity of the grave. The U.S. Government has protected them for 15 years; but, perhaps, not forever. 

To say that this threat from the Sauds is just “another sign of the escalating tensions between Saudi Arabia and the United States” seems like saying that a neighbor’s threat to bomb your house would constitute just “another sign of escalating tensions” between you and your neighbor. The passing-into-law of this bill in Congress would actually constitute a change from the U.S. Government being a friend and partner of the Sauds, to becoming their enemy.

Obviously, there is little likelihood of that happening; and, on April 20th and 21st, U.S. President Barack Obama is scheduled to meet with Saudi King Salman al-Saud. Without a doubt, this topic will be on the agenda, if it won’t constitute the agenda (which is allegedly to improve U.S. relations “with Arab leaders of Persian Gulf nations” — not specifically with Saudi King Salman and with his son Prince Salman). 

If President Obama represents the American public, then the Sauds will have real reason to fear: the U.S. President will not seek to block passage of that bill in Congress. However, if the U.S. President represents instead the Saud family, then a deal will be reached. Whether or not the U.S. Congress will go along with it, might be another matter, but it would be highly likely, considering that the present situation has already been going on for fifteen years, and that the high-priority U.S. Government foreign-policy objective, of overthrowing Bashar al-Assad, is also at stake here, and is also strongly shared not only by the Sauds but by the members of the U.S. Congress. Furthermore, the impunity of the Saud family is taken simply as a given in Washington. And, the U.S. Government’s siding with the Sauds in their war against Shia Muslims (not only against one Shiite: Assad) goes back at least as far as 1979. (Indeed, the CIA drew up the plan in 1957 to overthrow Syria’s Ba’athist Government, but it stood unused until President Obama came into office.)

Furthermore, the U.S. Government is far more aggressive to overthrow Russia-friendly national leaders, such as Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, Bashar al-Assad, and Viktor Yanukovych, than it is to stop the spread of fundamentalist Sunni groups, such as Al Qaeda, ISIS, etc.; and, a strong voice for U.S. foreign policy, the Polish Government, even said, on April 15th, that as AFP headlined that day, “Russia 'more dangerous than Islamic State', warns Poland foreign minister”; and Russia itself is, along with Shiite Iran, the top competitor against the fundamentalist Sunni Arab royal families in global oil-and-gas export markets. So, clearly, the U.S. Government is tightly bound to the Saud family. Terrorism in Europe and America is only a secondary foreign-policy concern to America’s leaders; and the Saud family are crucial allies with the U.S. Government in regards to what are, jointly, the top concerns of both Governments.

Consequently, there is widespread expectation that some sort of deal will be reached between U.S. President Barack Obama and the Saudi leaders, King and Prince Salman, and that the Republican-led Congress will rubber-stamp it, rather than pass the proposed bill to strip the Saud family’s immunity.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

When playing Poker if you haven't figured out who the patsy is within 10 are the patsy.

nope-1004's picture

And just who is going to be buying those Treasuries?  The assumption here is that if the Fed doesn't soak them up in some type of reverse ponzi, then the treasuries are somehow in demand.  lmao

TeamDepends's picture

Thought it said "Saudi King And Princess Obama..."

RAT005's picture

Instead of threatening to sell T-Bills, they should threaten to tell who they worked with in US gov. to make 9/11 happen.

Bumpo's picture

Or we could freeze their assets and bomb their oil fields.

El Vaquero's picture

If you want to wreck the global economy, you bomb their oilfields.


I wouldn't be surprised if an Arab Spring were to "spontaneously" happen over this. 

knukles's picture

What happens next was the topic?
Barry bows to the King, gets hosed, stomps about in a hissy fit and then says that he did a great job?

BaBaBouy's picture

EVEN The MAINSTREAM MEDIA Is Now Picking Up The StoryLine... RELEASE The Fucking 911 REPORT "Missing 28 PAGES"... NOW...

greenskeeper carl's picture

Even if this Saudi involvement is all there is to it (I don't believe that's it) this should absolutely wreck all credibility the US government has in the eyes of every American. This leak should be just as damaging to the us govt as the Saudi one. This is an admission that the government has been lying to the American people, non stop, for the last 15 years about 9/11. They attacked the wrong two countries and have not only maintained strong diplomatic and economic ties with that country, they have also given them billions in aid, and all the time those in the highest reaches of the American government have KNOWN about this for years and still do this.

If the American people have any sense, this is the end for the US govts credibility.

Haywood Jablowme's picture



J S Bach's picture

Why does this require so much accursed explanation? Where is common sense? Folks... the Saudis did NOT control access to the World Trade Center buildings to allow operatives to plant thermite explosives months in advance of the "terrorist" attacks on 911. All avenues of ingress and egress were controlled by Jews - dual-citizen Israeli/Americans. What does this tell a person with a properly functioning brain? Hmmmm. Me thinks the Mossad had a hand in the diabolical machinations of the heinous event. But, that line of reasoning would make me anti-Semitic, wouldn't it?

manofthenorth's picture

Exactly, am I to believe that some Saudi Prince was in charge of NORAD and all the defenses of the greatest military force on earth that day ????

So a jet was allowed to fly into the Pentagon, could have been the White House or the Capitol, and it was not blown out of the sky?

Richard Chesler's picture

"If President Obama represents the American public, then the Sauds will have real reason to fear"

Have you been living under a rock for the last 8 years?

Four chan's picture

obama is a bitch to the feds owners, just like every other fake president manchurian.

Uchtdorf's picture

It wuz that terrible video what made them Saudis fly them planes into our bildings and stuff.

Muh Raf's picture

4th time in under a week ZH is promoting the "28 pages" story and the usual propaganda monkeys have turned up to add their two penneth. The story is pathetic and the Saudis are sensible enough to know that if Iran can be blamed for 9/11 with no involvement, just like the invasion of 100% zero involvement Iraq, then guilt or innocence to the crime is irrelevant. It's all about stealing the country's natural assets and wealth - the usual US crime of armed robbery. And the low hanging fruit will always go first, i.e. US domiciled/located assets. Stop this Saudi involvement in 9/11 bollocks. We already know from the passenger manifests that NOT ONE of the 19 were on board the 4 flights, so what does it matter who met any of them? In an interview in the Sunday Telegraph within two weeks of the event no less than 7 of the so-called hijackers had been interviewed by the paper's journos. Even the father of Muhammad Atta had been interviewed and he told the paper that he had spoken with his son the day after the event on 9/12 and that his son was going into hiding in fear for his life. It's pathetic of ZH to keep running this disney fairytale; grow up.

swmnguy's picture

Astonishing how everyone forgets about all the "hijackers" interviewed after their supposed spectacularly fiery deaths.  Just as  nobody ever cleared up the matter of the passport sitting on the sidewalk, pretty as you please.

By the afternoon of 9/11/01 enough loose ends had slipped free that it was obviously a put-up job.

TheEndIsNear's picture

@manofthenorth:  It wasn't a commercial passenger jet, it was almost certainly a cruise missile with IR tracking capability that was dropped near the Pentagon by a military aircraft painted in civilian colors. According to interviews with Pentagon employees, a small explosion was set off outside the Pentagon at the point of impact shortly before the missile hit -- probably to provide a reliable target for the missile's IR tracking system. Large commercial passenger jets have two massive titanium alloy engines on the wings and heavy duty landing gear that would have left their own impact holes in the Pentagon wall. The fuselage of a passenger jet is not much more than a hollow aluminum cylinder that wouldn't have made much of an impact because it is less massive than the engines and landing gear.

Large aircraft with long wingspans cannot fly at high speed near the ground due to the aerodynamic law of "Ground Effect". Whatever hit the Pentagon only left a tiny 16 foot diameter hole near ground level (the portion of the Pentagon wall above the impact point collapsed about 20 minutes after the impact) with virtually no scattered debris, such as the aluminum fuselage, wings, engines, dead bodies, luggage, etc.

Even though the Pentagon is probably the most surveilled building in the world, only two frames of a distant and vague Pentagon camera recording of an explosion was released by the Pentagon. All private security cameras in the area were immediately confiscated, including a security camera at a service station across the street from the Pentagon that would have had a perfect unobstructed view of the impact.

Likewise the supposed "Let's roll" 757 aircraft in Shanksville left no recognizable debris; however there was an eyewitnesses (Susan McElwain) to a cruise missile hitting the spot where the Shanksville 757 was supposed to have impacted.

Why all the government lies and deception, and who is behind them?

Jack Ryan_00's picture

Some more evidence, that the official/commonly accepted version of events is not true, in fact, impossible. 

The towers were built on bedrock. 70 feet below the Hudson River in the *Bathtub*. Towers one and two had 500,000 tons of concrete and steel in each. Why was there no significant seismic event recorded when that amount of debris hit the ground? During the towers demise the sound did not travel through the earth. 230 outside steel columns 47 inner columns in each and the buildings came down faster than a bowling ball dropped from the top (9.5 sec). No P wave, no S wave, only a surface wave of an 8.0 sec duration.


Is everyone aware that there was a Cat 3 hurricane less than a day away from and driving straight toward Long Island on the morning of 9/11/01? Cat 1 and the NE evacuates



Ok and just another... WTC-7, a 47 story bldg, also collapsed at free-fall speed (7.0 sec) from an office fire on the 12th floor. Not possible


I DO NOT have answers but I do see some things that are patently false. Which leads me to WTF ?

Dr. Judy Wood has the only plausible answers for me as to the physical science/phenomena.

Ferrari's picture

Johann, are you saying Larry Silverstein isn't a Saudi? They were dancing Saudis with the van in New Jersey, right? I'm just trying to understand this...

what's that smell's picture

who the fuck is Eric Zuesse?

is he a tyler? why is zerohedge a neo-cuckservative butt boy? let's ask lord blankfiend; he's a tyler too.

anyway, iran did 911:

.....who submitted the iran911/zerohedge article?....none other than Authored by Eric Zuesse,

iran refuses to pay, saudi arabia blackmails the exceptional nation, blah blah zuesse seems to be a one note zionist.


Panopticon 131's picture

The irony is both Iran and KSA are deep in the clutches of the NWO, BIS, UN AGENDAS 2030 and 21, Brzezinski's Technotronic Era Orwellian monitoring and tracking with their smart meters, biometric RFID smart card, emerging cashless societies, Smart Region (Gulf Cooperation Council), etc.....

Iranian and Saudi elites are obedient minions to these charades - and all the world is a cluster**** stage.

matermaker's picture

It makes you sound like a zealous imbecile thinking that some mythology, like all the other religions past, present and future, is some power cult and your mortal enemy.  As if there aren't any poor working class jews that aren't part of the 'club' OR that there aren't plenty of non jews that are.

Is it that pointing your finger at simple human nature and greed are too difficult for you?   Is it just easier to pick out some 'other group' and blame them for what's fucked up about people in general?

I'd agree it's difficult to stomach the state of current human affairs, but the jews are no worse than the christians that go to some mega church that worships the money changing.  That has been going on as long as the Pope has been Catholic.

Thinking that all jews are some alien species separate from humans is simply moronic.   It's symptomatic of a man who has trouble taking responsibility for the world around him.   Pick out someone/group and blame them for being powerless and worthless.

Never get very far by blaming others for things.

matermaker's picture

Jesus was a jew, according to the religion.   He never railed against the old testament or said the the Jewish faith was fundementally flawed.    He never railed against Moses or Abraham for being part of 'satan's plot'. 

Get your head out of your ass and realize when you are being manipulated.

Ignatius's picture

But He did overturn some tables and told the banksters of the day to beat it out of Dodge.

techpriest's picture

Proverbs 11:1 - "God hates dishonest scales," which seems apropos for modern monetary policy.

Also, I've found one reason the modern world wants to keep you from reading the Bible is the very regular theme throughout, that various outcasts and unlikely figures are called upon to expose and challenge the PTB of their time. Read the story of Richard Wurmbrand; he stood up to communism in Romania, withstood torture for it, but history has since made him one of the greatest figures of that country's history. Among other things, the spiritual intensity about the man cause some of his torturers to covert and prefer to be tortured as dissidents instead of having a steady government job.

The message of modernity is instead "Keep comfortable, live small, take orders, do your job, don't bother about the big issues, and you will live easy and trouble-free." Any books that tell you not to sell out in this way are now unacceptable to read!

Clashfan's picture

from the link below:

In the severest terms, in verse 33, Jesus addressed them, “Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?” He described the scribes and Pharisees as poisonous snakes, destined for terrible judgment which would be theirs in hell, specifically Gehenna, the place of eternal punishment.

Jesus declared, in verse 34, that He would send to them prophets, wise men, and scribes who were also believers. Some of them they would persecute, some they would scourge and drive out of the synagogue, and others they would kill and crucify. Their works would justify bringing upon them the just condemnation coming from all the righteous blood shed upon the earth from the time of righteous Abel, killed by Cain (Gen 4:8), to the martyrdom of Zacharias, the son of Barachias (2 Ch 24:20-22). Zacharias, mentioned as the son of Jehoiada in2 Chronicles 24:20, probably was the grandson of the priest and Barachias was his actual father. Richard Glover, in his outline of Matthew 23, summarizes the characteristics of hypocrisy in these words, “Hypocrisy is a hard taskmaster…lives only for the praise of men…concerns itself with the small things of religion…deals with externals chiefly…reveres only what is dead…finds a fearful judgment.”118

The present sad chapter in the days of Israel’s apostasy was the climax of the religious rulers’ long rejection of the things of God. Jesus solemnly pronounced that all these acts of rejection of God and His prophets would cause judgment to come upon this generation, which they would bring to culmination by their rejection of God’s only Son. This prophecy was tragically fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem and the scattering of the children of Israel over the face of the earth. Jerusalem, the city of God, and the magnificent temple, the center of their worship, were to lay in ashes as an eloquent reminder that divine judgment on hypocrisy and sin is inevitable.

Lament over Jerusalem, 23:37-39

Probably no words of Jesus in His public ministry are more eloquent than the words recorded in Matthew of Christ’s lament over Jerusalem (cf. His earlier lament over Jerusalem, Lk 19:41-44). Here is revealed the breaking heart of God over a people whom God loved,


Lorca's Novena's picture

Why the fuck is everyone supposed to worship the fucking JEW God?

J S Bach's picture

Evidence is evidence, Mater.  I live in the real world.  I observe facts, I analyze them, I synthesize them, and inevitably reach a logical conclusion of guilt or innocence based on those facts, NOT PREJUDICE.  It was not Christians, nor Musiims who were in all pertinent points of authority where 9/11 is concerned.  All critical levers of the plot were in the hands of Jews.  Whether you like it or not, this is a fact.  Of course, they had their usual number of shabbos goy involved (Bush, Cheney, et al.), but all logic points to the self-chosen leadership's guilt in this affair.  

Sticks and stones may break my bones, but facts are impermeable.

acetinker's picture

I understand where mater's coming from, as do I you.  But I think there's a rather critical distinction that you both are missing.

They're not just Jews... matter of fact I wouldn't call 'em Jews at all... they're Ashkenazis.

They've donned the robes of Judaism for convenience only.

As for the Saudis- the threat seems like an admission, to me.

Tall Tom's picture





Both you and I have known about Saudi culpability for quite awhile.


But in Courts of Law it is not what you know but that which you can prove.


If those documents are opened it will be a delightful Pandora's Box of proof.


They cannot care less about the fact that we know.

acetinker's picture

You may also know that our courts have not practiced law since 1871.  They are equity courts now- common law is of no interest there.

However, if there's a pot of money to be pilfered somewhere, you can rest assured it will be.

Jim Willie has claimed for awhile that SA is tapped out, oil-wise- pumping 94% water.  Water being what they inject to force out the oil.

SA has also been the lynchpin for the petrodollar scheme all these years.

Maybe there's just no good reason to protect them anymore?

Willie's a crazy fucker though, right?

TheReplacement's picture

He was point out the likely involvement by another nation by point out the religion and citizenships of those people.  He was saying it all points to Israel.

TheEndIsNear's picture

It's not a question of Judaism or average Jews who were completely unaware of the events leading up to 9/11 and had no part in it. In fact, it was an elderly Jewish lady who pointed out the "dancing Israelis" who had camera equipment prepositioned to record the first impact before it happened, and danced around in celebration after having video taped the event.

Israeli Nationalists/Zionists or what we could call Neocons (most with dual Israeli/USA citizenship) are the problem. They view non-Jews as scum of the earth who don't deserve to live, and would have no pangs of conscience whatsoever to killing 3,000 Americans to further their cause and trick the USA into destroying their enemies. 

Katos's picture

Don't forget, George Bush's brother,, MARVIN Bush  was the head of security for WORLD TRADE CENTER ON 911 

Troy Ounce's picture



"A Houston businessman who worked closely with the Bush family over the years confided that Marvin Bush and Wirt Walker appear to have taken over the Saudi real estate investment and aircraft brokerage business once run out of Texas by Houston-based James Bath in association with Salem bin Laden, the late brother of Osama bin Laden, and Khalid bin Mahfouz."




The lead story is btw the death of Marvins baby sitter, Bertha Champagne, who died after being run over by her own car which, police say, "had somehow been left in gear".

Now car gears seem to be very dangerous in the US, especially if you are somehow related to the Bush damily or 9/11 as Nancy Hamilton, the 82-year old wife of former U.S. Representative Lee Hamilton, the former chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the co-chair of the 9/11 Commission that investigated the attacks, was killed when her own vehicle ran her over in the parking lot of a veterinarian's office.

This important 9/11 witness died also mysteriously: Barry Jennings

And another one: Beverly Eckert was an activist and advocate for the creation of the 9/11 Commission. She was one of the members of the 9/11 Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Commission. died in the Colgan Air Flight 3407

It does not stop!

Kenneth Johannemann and William Rodriguez provided a detailed account of their experience. One aspect of their stories is similar, but contradicts the official report presented by the 9/11 commission. Both men reported that they heard loud explosions in the basement of the North Tower immediately before and after the plane impacted. Kenneth Johannemann was adamant about the fact that he heard explosions not associated with the crash. Johannemann committed suicide by way of a gunshot wound to the head.  

Michael H. Doran, 51, of Amherst, died in the crash of a single-engine plane that he was piloting on Tuesday, April 28, 2009, outside Cleveland. 

Christopher Landis was Operations Manager for Safety Service Patrol at the VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation).


Zero Point's picture

Very clever to use a pack of outrageous cunts like the Saudis as Patsies. Even though most will suspect they're only pawns, they'll still cheer when they get a dagger up the anus in a public street, and like good sheep will only feel a little puzzled that our Zionist allies get away scott free along with their US .gov dupes and collection of dual citizens.

Gonzogal's picture

I am trying to find the link but I read that Marvin Bush owned company that was working and in charge of the security at the WTC until the day before 9/11 and had unfettered access to the building.

ZD1's picture



During her tenure as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made weapons transfers to the Saudi government a “top priority,” making Saudi Arabia the largest U.S. Foreign Military Sales customer.

While Clinton’s State Department was deeply invested in getting weapons to Saudi Arabia, the Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars in donations from both the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the weapons manufacturer Boeing.

Katos's picture

Don't yall remember when the king gave Hillary a $500,000.00 Diamond necklace?  Which of course is completely illegal for her to accept in her position. But then,Obama got 1.2 million worth of jewels and gifts from the good king in 2014$

Katos's picture

I agree completely.  Americans should be outraged! 911 has been the day that has allowed this criminal crime cabal to take over our county. Passage of the PATRIOT ACT, robbing us of our Constitutionalrights.  The murdering of millions of people in countries that had nothing to do with 911.  The spending of 7 Trillion taxpayers dollars on phony wars, bankrupting our country. Putting us 20 Trillion dollars in debt. The Pentagon is missing 8.4 Trillion dollars. Americans have lost their jobs, their homes,  their opportunities for the future. We have been sold out by these ASSHATS.  George Bush and Osama Bin Laden were business associates.  The Bush family has been in bed with the Bin Laden for 40 years. We have been scameed, screwed, and we are close to complete destruction.  We need to bring the criminals from 911 to justice, including George Busb, and DICK-TATOR CHENEY! 

Nassim's picture

This is all a smokescreen - to hide the real perpetrators:

9-11/Israel did it

BaBaBouy's picture

You can just see the BIG TURDS flying towards the HD Fan Right about now ...

Paveway IV's picture

I just don't find this threat credible. Not that the Saudis wouldn't do it, but it's the wrong threat.

I'm missing what should be the biggest and most logical threat Saudis would make to the U.S.:

"If you expose evidence that Saudi Arabia provided the patsies for 9/11 and make our kingdom look bad, then we will retaliate and reveal who hired us to provide those patsies <cough> Cheney, various rouge elements of the U.S. government and Israel..."

Many seem to be under the bizarre impression that the Saudis would be capable of orchestrating the entire 9/11 operation. I believe they played a part and supplied some meat, but there is no God damn way on earth they planned and orchestrated the entire operation. They have no control over the U.S. military, the FAA, etc.

If the U.S. is going to throw Saudi princes under the bus, then they have little incentive to keep U.S. secrets for us any longer. If there is a God in heaven, congress will authorize the release and piss off the Saudis enough to squeal on their U.S. masters. Hell, that would be more interesting than the election clownfuckery. 

Alas, our spineless, treasonous Congress will do nothing of the sort. They will never risk the REAL threat the Saudis pose: evidence of U.S. complicity in 9/11.

new game's picture

done reading this thread, thanks paver, great comment...

Socratic Dog's picture

Paveway is one of the most astute commentators I've seen here over the years.  And that's high praise.

Sir Edge's picture

Damit Paveway... Crike... I am now awarding + One Kabillion upVotes... !

I haven't given out a Kabillion upVotes in over 8 months... but i have to fark one out now... most excellent... precise to the point post laddie.

I keep wondering if ZHedge is being paid to post these Saudi 911 dis-information shill posts...

Tyler... I promise i will click on more ads... !

Dear Tyler and Co... could you post what the income is for your Saudi 911 articles... are you getting paid directly from the CIA or Mossad or both... does MI6 get a cut... are you being blackmailed... were you naughty Tyler... was it a Honey Trap buddy ??

If it was a Honey Trap Tyler... could you post a pic of the pink honey... it's a weakness of mine too...  :o)

What is with these ZH Saudi Rorschach 911 did it test posts... okay... each time you post this 911 Saudi did it drivel... Well... Your right i see a vagina... no wait its a turban... wait no its really a dancing Israeli... Yes, i see Larry Silverstein smiling back at me and singing the pull it song... I see Netanyahu speaking about 911 being a good thing for Israel... I see... well... i certainly... with all the mountain of evidence out there... I don't see the Sauds involved.

Yours Truly... Edgey... always on edge.

beemasters's picture

Please send me an ALERT when ZH posts some facts that would displease the Zionists.....Meanwhile, continue being satisfied with ZH's "Muslims and Arabs are the mastermind of all world's ills."

Socratic Dog's picture

This has to be some sort of fallback position, built in from the beginning (the redacted pages), keeping atttention diverted from the real culprits.  It's patently obvious Israel and the US Deep State were the prime movers.  Saudi government is the second-line patsy.  Like most patsies, they likely had some peripheral involvement.

My question is, why now?  Have to wonder whether the Trump movement is forcing hands.  This whole thing does seem to be going faster and faster, getting real close to the drainhole.