Valued At $16 It Sold For $68 Million "In 7200 Seconds" - The Inside Story Of Vancouver's Wildest Property Deal

Tyler Durden's picture

For the past four months we have been closely following the sheer bubble panic, if not outright insanity, that has gripped the Vancouver housing market (here, here, here, here, here and many more) which has been over the past year, converted into the personal offshore piggybank of wealthy Chinese oligarchs seeking to park laundered money outside of their home nation. On the way, the story took an odd detour into the outright bizarre when we reported the curious story of the Chinese tycoon found "chopped up into 100 pieces" in a Vancouver mansion.

But nothing compares to this fascinating story reported first by the South China Morning Post, in which the paper's investigation revealed the obscure transactions behind a commercial real estate frenzy, including a two-hour stampede by investors desperate to pay C$60m for a site valued at C$16m. Then, a month after taking ownership, they resold it for C$68m.

Presenting, the inside story of Vancouver’s wildest property deal, gone in 7,200 seconds

Julia Lau (inset) boasted on social media that the October sale of C$60 million
worth of shares in 1059 and 1075 Nelson Street (main picture) in Vancouver
had been sold out to investors in “7,200 seconds”.

It was in fall last year that Bruno and Peter Wall received an offer too good to refuse.

The prominent Vancouver property developers behind Wall Financial Corporation had spent C$16.8 million (HK$102 million) to buy two ageing walk-up apartment blocks on adjacent lots on Nelson Street in 2013. They had big plans for the downtown site: a glittering 60-storey residential skyscraper, taking advantage of the location within the city’s West End Community Plan, where a building could rise 168 metres tall under new zoning. The project was dubbed “Nelson on the Park” and the Walls turned to favourite designer Chris Doray to come up with what they hoped would be a new Vancouver landmark.

But now a consortium of investors was proposing something even more remarkable.

They would pay the Walls C$60 million for the site alone, which had just been valued at C$15.6 million by BC Assessment. The huge profit was impossible to resist, and the sale was completed in late January.

Doray, a 25-year veteran of the Vancouver development scene whose design has now been shelved, said he was “astonished” by the transaction, which he said set a new benchmark for commercial real estate in the city.

“The price on this block of land has now thrown everybody in the industry out of whack,” said Doray. "The property is worth, what, C$20 million, and somebody pays C$60million? One wonders what’s going on. Is this New York? Is this Hong Kong?"

1059 Nelson Street in downtown Vancouver, where property developers
Bruno and Peter Wall had once hoped to build a 
60-story skyscraper.

The scale of the purchase, orchestrated by Sun Commercial Real Estate (Suncom) - a firm that specialises in pooling wealthy investors from Vancouver’s Chinese immigrant community - was exceptional enough.

The now-shelved design for ‘Nelson on the Park’.

But an investigation by the South China Morning Post now reveals the strange and frantic backdrop to the transaction - including a two-hour stampede by Suncom’s investors, desperate for a slice of the deal. It is a transaction that also sheds light on the rush of Chinese money fuelling Vancouver’s soaring real estate market.

The Post interviewed key players and pored over land titles, company directorship and address changes, and English and Chinese social media postings to understand a transaction that looked, from the outside, incomprehensible - and potentially disastrous.

But Suncom, whose activities are being reviewed by the BC Securities Commission, knew exactly what it was doing.

Because on February 29, one month after taking ownership of the Nelson Street site, the Suncom consortium flipped it, corporate records show.

The price was C$68 million. And the Post met the new buyer, a rich Chinese immigrant named Gao Shan, last month.

 

‘Prepare the bank draft tomorrow. The shares will be sold out on Monday’

The blocks of apartments at 1059 and 1075 Nelson St could not be more nondescript. On a recent afternoon, there was a broken ground-floor window at weary-looking 1075, a Canadian flag draped as a makeshift curtain. Next door, at 1059, a waft of marijuana smoke drifted out of an open window.

 But as she considered the apartments last October 8, Suncom’s self-professed vice-president, Julia Lau Chi Yuen, told her Facebook friends she was feeling excited.

Julia Lau (centre) with performers at a Suncom party last July 19.

Once among the most successful realtors in Vancouver, the Hong Kong immigrant had been prohibited from practising the previous January, after voluntarily surrendering her license ahead of a disciplinary hearing by the Real Estate Council of BC.

Nine months later, she was busy rounding up investors for 1075 and 1059 Nelson Street, the site still owned by the Walls, which Suncom was promoting as “1065 Nelson St”. Lau was a good fit with Suncom, having fostered close connections with the city’s rich Chinese immigrant buyers; in a 2013 interview, she told the SCMP they made up 80 per cent of her customers and later boasted on her website of selling more than C$560 million worth of homes from 2009 to 2014.

In a Facebook post that Thursday, Lau claimed “we just bought” 1065 Nelson St. Suncom was offering C$60 million worth of “shares” in the property that were poised to go on sale the next week – and they would go fast.

"Whoever want [sic] to invest has to prepare the deposit with bank draft tomorrow. The shares will be sold out on Monday,” she predicted.

“The shares will be sold out on Monday”. An October 8, 2015,
Facebook posting by Suncom’s self-professed vice president Julia Lau.

It was no idle brag.

The Nelson Street sale was not the biggest that Suncom had promoted, but with its prominent downtown location and massive price-to-valuation mark-up, the transaction represented a culmination of efforts.

On February 21 last year, Suncom had pitched C$30 million worth of shares in two lots at Tisdall Street on Vancouver’s Westside, that had a BC Assessment valuation of only C$11.7million. Investors snapped up the shares in one day, Lau said on Facebook. Land titles show 5826 and 5860 Tisdall Street are now owned by a holding company (“5826&5860 Tisdall Holding Ltd”) whose directors are Suncom president Davidson Guo and Denise Dan Wei She.

A Chinese language flyer posted online by Julia Lau declares that shares in
1065 Nelson Street sold out in just “7,200 seconds”

Then, on May 22, Suncom put the site of Richmond’s Silver City entertainment complex up for grabs, with C$103 million worth of shares selling out in one week. Guo and She are also the directors of the company (“14111 Entertainment Blvd Investments Ltd”) that now owns that sprawling 10-hectare site.

Meanwhile, capital outflows from China were reaching a fever pitch, as companies and individuals scrambled to send money overseas last year in record volumes ahead of a feared yuan devaluation. The Canadian dollar was also plummeting, making Canadian property relatively more affordable to yuan earners, and average detached house prices in metro Vancouver soared more than 40 per cent last year, hitting an average of C$1.8 million.

Peer-reviewed research had previously indicated how Vancouver’s property market had decoupled from the local economy, and was instead being steered by recent immigrants’ foreign earnings and wealth. The vast majority of those rich immigrants have been Chinese.

And so, against this heady backdrop on the morning of October 12, Suncom threw open the gates for the Nelson Street sale.

The result was nothing short of a frenzy.

“The 60million dollars project at 1065 Nelson St Vancouver’s shares sold out in two hours! Thank you very much for the supporting from all my clients!” Lau announced on Facebook on October 14.

A Chinese-language flyer on Suncom letterhead she posted at the same time trumpeted the sale as her “perfect success”.

“Sale of C$60 million property project completed in 7,200 seconds,” it said. “My perfect success - thanks to the strong support and love of shareholders. My only return - the maximum returns I can bring to you.”

The Post has no evidence that Lau received remuneration for providing real estate services while unlicensed, as prohibited under the Real Estate Services Act; her Facebook posting from October 14 suggests that she claims not to have been paid. Nor does the Post suggest that Lau was selling shares in real property at the Nelson St site, as opposed to shares in a company that owned the site. Neither Lau nor her lawyer, Joe Carangi, responded to SCMP questions about her role in the Nelson Street sale and her other activities on behalf of Suncom.

“I’m so proud to call myself the vice president!” Julia Lau at a Suncom
party in photos she posted online last September. 
The firm has since
claimed she was never an employee or 
officer of the firm

Fundraising tactics used in deals involving Suncom have previously drawn the attention of the BC Securities Commission, which in January announced it was reviewing the firm’s activities, partly in response to an SCMP article about whether the firm was involved in crowdfunding. In BC, crowdfunding – the mass online recruitment of investors – is limited to C$250,000 per project and a maximum of two projects per year. Individual investors are limited to C$1,500 per project. The BCSC told the Post this month that the review of Suncom was ongoing.

In a statement issued on March 12 via lawyer James Carpick, the company said that “as far as Suncom knows, Ms Lau was never involved in ‘crowdfunding’.”

But the firm distanced itself from Lau, saying that she was never formally employed by Suncom, but was “allowed to use the title ‘Vice President’ for a few months in the summer of 2015”. “Suncom terminated her use of that title, although she may have placed ads that used it that could not be recalled instantly, and she may have used it for a longer time than she was permitted to do, but, if that happened, this was not something within Suncom’s control or done with its approval,” the statement said.

Suncom refused to discuss the identity of its investors, and whether they qualified for exemptions from prospectus-issuance, normally required in the case of securities sales.

As for Suncom’s plans for the site, the firm revealed that it had “no ongoing involvement” in the property.

The site had already been resold - and with speed that suggested negotiations were underway even before the purchase from the Walls had closed at the end of January.

 

Who owns 1065 Nelson Street?

Keeping up with the changing ownership of the Nelson Street site has been no simple matter.

The changes do not show up in land titles for the two lots, because they remain to this day in the hands of Nelson Street Residences Ltd, a firm set up by the Walls in 2013 which was added to the titles in March 2014.

Instead, it is ownership of Nelson Street Residences that has changed hands, thereby avoiding property transfer taxes of C$1.78 million for Suncom’s consortium. The share-transfer tactic is common among commercial real estate deals and perfectly lawful.

These transfers are depicted in directorship and mailing address changes for the company, which switched on January 30 from Wall Financial Corp’s office, to a multimillion-dollar penthouse in the downtown Shangri-La Estates. The new director was named as “Peter She”; Suncom refused to discuss his connection, if any, to the firm, and Peter She did not respond to SCMP questions delivered via a registered letter that was accepted at his address.

The land title for 1075 Nelson Street, obtained in January 2016, lists the
owner as Nelson Street Residences, whose address is
the Burrard Street
offices of Wall Financial Corp

A corporate search for Nelson Street Residences, conducted on February 10,
2016, lists Peter She as the new director, with the mailing address switching
to a penthouse in the Shangri-La Estates on West Georgia St.

However realtor David Taylor, the Colliers International vice-president who acted as a consultant to the Walls on the sale, confirmed that they had sold the Nelson Street site to Suncom’s consortium for C$60 million.

Joanne Liu, vice-president of Wall Financial, said she was prohibited from discussing the sale by a confidentiality clause, although she confirmed that Peter She did not represent the Walls.

In any case, Peter She did not last long in his position at Nelson Street Residences, because on February 29, directorship again changed, to a man named Gao Shan, whose address was listed as an accountancy office on West Broadway.

By keeping his name off the land titles, Gao legally avoided paying more than C$2million in property transfer taxes.

Another corporate search, conducted on March 24, shows that on February
29, 2016, Peter She was replaced by Gao Shan as the
sole director of
Nelson Street Residences, with its address moving
from She’s downtown
penthouse to an accountancy office on West
Broadway.

 

‘The whole industry is astonished’

Chris Doray, who designed Vancouver’s Wall Centre and was again commissioned by Bruno and Peter Wall for the ill-starred Nelson on the Park project, has watched the site change hands with a mounting sense of disbelief.

His innovative design for the site, nicknamed the “pixelated tower”, was shortlisted at the 2015 World Architecture Festival in Singapore. It features a lattice-like façade that seems to dissolve into the sky.

But Doray now considers the plans shelved. “[They] weren’t so much interested in the project, but more in the land, as an investment,” Doray said of the consortium that bought the site off the Walls.

The widespread industry rumour – since confirmed by the SCMP – that the site had already been flipped seemed to validate Doray’s suspicions that the previous sale was a purely “speculative purchase”.

“I cannot believe that people will pay that kind of money for a plot of land”.
Chris Doray, designer of the shelved “Nelson on
the Park” skyscraper.

A source familiar with the initial C$60 million sale said “this is Chinese money, looking for an increase in value of the land”. “It seems crazy to think that someone might pay more, say a year from now, but it’s happening all the time,” the source said - apparently without realising that a subsequent sale had already taken place.

Doray said Wall Financial had attempted to persuade its buyers to press on with the skyscraper project, which he said had been “quite well received by the City” last summer.

“It was there, pretty much ready to go, but they were not interested. They just sold it to another party,” he said.

He said that in a quarter century of involvement in Vancouver’s real estate scene he had seen nothing like the transactions linked to the Nelson Street lot. “I cannot believe that people will pay that kind of money for a plot of land. The whole industry is astonished.”

The now-shelved design for ‘Nelson on the Park’, and its  “pixelated” roof.

Meeting Mr Gao

In a strange twist, the new buyer of the site, Gao Shan, shares his name with a well-known Chinese embezzler who lived as a fugitive in Vancouver before surrendering in 2012 to authorities in the mainland, where he is less than two years into a 15-year jail term.

A third Gao Shan, meanwhile, is listed by Interpol as a fraud suspect and international fugitive.

And so the SCMP requested to meet the director of Nelson Street Residences, to confirm that he was not acting on behalf of either of his dubious namesakes by using their identity documents. An April 4 meeting took place at the office of Gao’s accountant, Jonathan Wong.

Gao, tanned and dressed casually in a long-sleeved polo shirt, bore no resemblance to either of his namesakes, who are aged 50 and 52; he appeared younger than both. “[There are] many people named Gao Shan,” he joked in English, glancing at the Interpol notice.

Wong handed over his client’s BC drivers’ licence as identification, but the date of birth had been covered with an opaque piece of tape, which the SCMP asked to be removed. Wong was reluctant, citing concerns about identity theft, but Gao waved away his worries and the tape was briefly peeled off to show a 1971 birthdate matching neither that of the convicted embezzler nor the fugitive fraud suspect.

The SCMP makes no suggestion of any wrongdoing by Gao or Wong; nor does it suggest any connection between the Nelson Street Residences director and either of the two men who share his name.

Wong was keen for the meeting to end but the SCMP asked Gao for an on-the-record interview. The accountant demurred, but Gao gave a grin. “One question only,” Gao said, holding up a finger.

Why would Gao pay C$68 million for the Nelson Street properties, when this was so far in excess of the valuation? After a brief discussion in Putonghua, Wong answered on Gao’s behalf, without disputing the sum.

It is an investment that Mr Gao sees will give him a good return, and that’s why he made the purchase. I hate to give such a general answer but that’s how business decisions are made. If it’s not going to make money, he’s not going to invest,” Wong said.

The Post managed one follow-up question, asking Gao if he intended to develop the site. “Yes, this is a development site, it’s for development,” said Wong, after a nod from Gao. Wong also allowed that his client be described as a property developer. “I don’t believe there is anything more,” Wong said, and the meeting was adjourned.

In a subsequent email, Wong said: “Historical price and government assessment values were irrelevant in setting the purchase price of the two properties. Only the projected net profit was relevant.” He added that “you may be amazed” by checking the potential development returns on the site.

Designer Doray, who understands the potential of the site as well as anyone, isn’t so sure. “If the developer pays C$60 million for the piece of land, can you imagine what any condos on it would sell for, if they finally finish this project?” Doray said, laughing. “It will be untouchable – well, for the local market. It could only be an elite group of people at this price.”

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
GoldenGoosed's picture

What do u mean is this New York? Their high end real estate is beginning to fall off the cliff with few or no buyers out there to buy it.

Silver Bug's picture

I've pointed this out for years. This is plain and simply "legal" money laundering. These wealthy elites from China are desperately trying to get their money out of the "motherland" and this is the best way they can do it. These insane property deals are happening all the time in Vancouver. 

http://marcfabersblog.blogspot.com/2016/04/marc-faber-there-is-huge-shif...

CounterPartyVice's picture

It's money laundering, it's that simple.

Laowei Gweilo's picture

more accurately it would be domestic divestment

money laundery implies a liquidity that most Vancouver investors don't seek because a large portion of them still intend to have their families live in Vancouver, and they themselves often try live their as much as possible (usually the few months required per year to retain residency while still operating business back home). if laundry was the sole purpose, mortgage use and residency would be far lower.

further, the money is legal in Canada... it could be sitting in a RBC savings account and it has no difference on whether or not PBOC back home can touch it. FINTRAC ain't going to touch it with anything less than a federal extradition, which would then treat cash or housing the exact same. the reason it's in real estate, not cash, is for the ROI -- to the laundry. it's already laundered (read: divested from China) simply by reaching Canada.

at least based on my anecdotes in vancouver with family and close friends. maybe you've personally seen different first-hand and I cannot speak to your anecodtes.

Antifaschistische's picture

I am plugged into the Chinese community in Houston and I have many good Chinese friends. I've also spent a lot of time in China. (Keshi wode zhongwen bu tai hao) We often have discussions about distinctions between Americans and Chinese.  It's interesting because "on the streets" of China people do not trust eachother at all.  But here's an example.

If a guy shows up at my house to sell me a vacuum cleaner and  he's driving a Tesla...American's will say "this guy makes way too much money selling vacuums" and we will not buy from him.

ALL my Chinese associates laugh at this and say Chinese people are exactly the opposite.  If someone drive a very expensive car then Chinese people will certainly want to buy what they are selling.

I'm sure this phenomenon contributes to the Vancover R/E market and I'm sure Chinese R/E agents take FULL advantage of this vulnerability in otherwise rational thought processes.  (ditto for peer to peer lending, Shanghai "homes", steel rebar, etc...)

Buster Cherry's picture

I'm more comfortable with a financial advisor driving a Mercedes than if he drove a Corolla.

 

dammit, finger twitch

JamesBond's picture

Much better for them to buy on the gulf of mexico.

 

jb

old naughty's picture

nah, they'd have another  pay double to take it off this buyer; and another...

unparallel, even NY / HK.

BaBaBouy's picture

$$$ CALM Down TYLER ... $$$

VANCOUVER Is The New NYC ...

 

waterwitch's picture

New meaning to the term "chinese laundry".

Taylor's picture
Taylor (not verified) waterwitch Apr 23, 2016 7:54 AM

Trump Got It Right Again. This Is the Undeniable Proof...

However the mainstream media isn't saying a word about it!

What are they really trying to cover up?

http://bit.ly/23Q9Ess

Handful of Dust's picture

"If you want to keep your money laundering, you can keep your money laundering, I promise."

 

~ Boi King Trudeaux

Frankie Carbone's picture

Trump's a bimbo. I can't believe that you man-worship the blowhard.

As usual, he's late to figuring this out, along with everything else for that matter, yet you attribute some special attributions to him that are boggling to the imagination. 

Cut it out. It's annoying as hell. 

skidsmango1's picture

Frankie, please tell me which candidate figured it out already and talked about it???

Antifaschistische's picture

good luck with that...perhaps you could also fisit the Mutual Fund Store.   The gal/guy there driving the nicest car may be the best sales person, or perhaps the best looking, but I wouldn't never ever listen to their financial advice.  Ask any of them about what they believe the impact of Zero Interest Rates will be long term on Equity or Bond Markets. 

Buster Cherry's picture

I'm more comfortable with a financial advisor driving a Mercedes than if he drove a Corolla.

astroloungers's picture

Why the angst ? Who has benefited from this ? Native Canadian property owners, thats who. I remember back in the eighties the Japanese were buying big properties in the U.S. even as far as the concession at Yosemite, oh the humanity. When it all went bust as it allways does, someone went back to Tokoyo, tails tucked, wallet lighter. Looks to me like this may be some repatriation of the digi units spent on Chinese garbage. No worries on this one, more pressing problems at hand. I promise those properties will be there in 10 years.

Never One Roach's picture

Since Trudeau passed the "No Chinese Money Launderer Left Behind Act of 2015" everything is awesome for realtors, bankers and Hongcouver lawyers. The only losers are the 99% of middle Canadians priced out of the market ... but they don't count.

monk27's picture

You know the saying "A fool and his money are soon parted" ? Guess what, it's a law of nature ! The Chinese are just learning it now...

Escrava Isaura's picture

 

 

I didn’t bother to read this article but: Is what these young ladies bragging about true? Or, are they exaggerating it?

 

 

Philo Beddoe's picture

Why the down votes? 

Coles notes - Dumb Cunts with money. Yeah, I would bang every single one of them. 

Escrava Isaura's picture

 

 

Well, you have theirs $60 million dollars address. So, just tell them that you have 69 solutions for their new gig.

 

Spitzer's picture

its still a better investment then US treasuries

CheapBastard's picture

Global corruption meets global money laundering with little concern from governments. They are too busy chasing climate change deniers and similar.

Lore's picture

Not so dumb, if that Julia has indeed "sold" $560M as she claims. I'd watch her like a hawk. She strikes me as a cunning sociopath.

AGuy's picture

"'ve pointed this out for years. This is plain and simply "legal" money laundering."

There are better places to launder money than Vancouver.  This is a buying frenzy that will end in tears.

 

Confucius says: "Fool with money quickly part ways"

4freedom78's picture

Right, the Chinese elite ( stupid and not ) are panicking to get the f**k out of China. Shitstorm is coming.

acetinker's picture

Pretty sure you know then, that at the end of the day, these 'investments' are worth precisely zero.

Is it okay that I don't actually give a flyin' fuck?

Condition 1SQ's picture

Dumb people making obscene amounts of money pisses me off.  Always has.  Must be a character flaw.

One thing I don't understand is why those laundering money would all dogpile onto the same outrageously overpriced area?

This only works so long as the music keeps playing.  Once the buying pressure eases for whatever reason, the prices will collapse.  To me, it would be better to spread wealth across several cities and towns.  This is more gambling than anything else.

Winston1984's picture

"One thing I don't understand is why those laundering money would all dogpile onto the same outrageously overpriced area?"

The infrastructure is there. That's what all of these local 'agents' are selling.  Its a place that has worked for others, so it can work for you too.   Its like the nice chap at your resort who speaks great english - if you need something, you go to him first...

Of course, it always works until it doesn't. 

RichardParker's picture

The infrastructure is there.

That would explain why they bought up detroit.

Derfman's picture

I am not sure if this has been pointed out or not (haven't read too many comments) but isn't it obvious that the "buyers" and "sellers" are related ? What better way to keep the money (embezzeled, stolen or otherwise) in the family?

anonymousplz's picture

The bigger the price tag, the more efficient the laundry.

Badsamm's picture

It's gonna suck when they lose $58 mil

exabi's picture

Likely the  longest article ever on zh.

lincolnsteffens's picture

"There are 8 Million Stories in the Naked City and this has been one of them." A bizarre story in a bizarro world is becoming bizarrly common place.

AUD's picture

So the point is Julia fancies white girls?

Looks like she's having a good time anyway.

TheBigN's picture

Only the houseless locals unwilling to relocate should give some fuck. To others, there are many great places around the country and world besides Vancouver.

Yen Cross's picture

   7,200 seconds = 120 minutes = 2hours    I guess you have to sensationalize the ponzi though.

   The property value has nothing to do with this. It's all about laundering money through dummy shell companies.

Atomizer's picture

Correct, although the Kenyan negro is attempting to jump start another housing lending scam. 

Don't forget, you are required too rent to felons, ISIS, and terrorist. It's the President Obama way. 

/sarc

Edit: I have a blackberry passport and a pen to decline voicemail messages. Fuck you Obama. 

Press #7 to delete. 

WTFUD's picture

7,200 sec = 7,200,000,000,000 nano sec OR 150,000,000,000

Goldman Trades

Atomizer's picture

2007 again. It's been known for 6 months. Liquidate. 

HRH of Aquitaine's picture
HRH of Aquitaine (not verified) Apr 22, 2016 7:57 PM

I liked how they got around paying property taxes after the sale. That is fucking genius. Can we do that here in the USSA?

The SCMP trying to find the correct Gao Shan was funny too. The guy sounds like a real smart ass. Lots of people named Gao Shan? Seriously? And who in the hell puts tape on their driver's license?

It sounds like the Chinese don't care what the laws are in Vancouver.

Wild Theories's picture

but they cared enough about the tax laws to find ways to skirt all of them

Yukon Cornholius's picture

It's not that they found a way to skirt them, it's that the cowards and pussies in the legislature and law anforcement are too afraid to go after them. Triads are a bitch to deal with I guess.

The province needs to seize these properties until a full list of investors with confirmation of identity is disclosed. Like that will fucking happen.

Lore's picture

Exactly right. The market needs to be frozen and a large scale probe launched with collaboration between local and Chinese authorities.  Do you see it happening?  Local officials are reputed to have their own strings (e.g., see "Hollyhock Mafia" and "Tides Foundation").