As Norway offers cash for refugees to leave, announcing that they won't be accepting any more refugees from the EU, and Switzerland prepares its military to close down borders, the EU has seemingly had enough of every country acting as if it has any type of sovereignty left. The European Commission has announced that it is going to pull rank on everyone, and in Obama-like fashion, will be fining countries for not taking their fair share of refugees.
Here is a detailed summary of all that happened today in the ongoing European refugee crisis courtesy of Mish Shedlock.
* * *
EU Plans $290,000 Per Person Fine on Countries Refusing “Fair Share” of Refugees; Case For Brexit Crystallized
The European Commission plans fines of $290,000 per person on countries refusing to take in their fair share of refugees.
This plan is aimed straight at Poland, Slovokia, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Austria.
The UK, Ireland, and Denmark all have opt-out policies, but the UK cannot expect that to last forever unless the vote goes for Brexit.
Punitive Fines
Today the EC fired a warning shot across the bow of countries who believe they have a right to control their foreign policies.
The announcement comes in the form of Punitive Penalties for Refusing Asylum Seekers.
The European Commission has proposed reforms to EU asylum rules that would see stiff financial penalties imposed on countries refusing to take their share of asylum seekers.
The bloc’s executive body is planning a sanction of €250,000 (£200,000; $290,000) per person.
The UK and Ireland can opt out of asylum policies, and the British government has already indicated it will not take part. Denmark is also exempt.
Countries refusing to accept their quota would effectively be fined – with the money going to frontline states such as Italy and Greece that have carried the burden.
The proposals for sanctions alarmed Central European countries that have refused to implement the refugee quota deal:
- Poland’s foreign minister wondered if it was “a serious proposal”
- Slovakia’s interior minister complained the proposed “fair share” system failed to respect reality
- Hungary called it “blackmail” and “unacceptable”
- The Czech Republic said it was an unpleasant surprise as it returned to a concept of mandatory quotas which had been rejected
The four countries were outvoted when the quota plan was agreed.
Hungary’s government on Tuesday announced plans for a referendum on the EU’s resettlement plans.
Add Austria to the List
Following Austria’s vote last month in national elections it’s safe to add Austria to the list.
For details, please see Anti-Immigration Party Wins First Round of Austria Elections: “We are Not the World’s Social Department”.
Hungary Referendum on Quota Wins Supreme Court Backing
The Hungarian government’s plans to hold a referendum on whether it will accept the EU’s quota system on accepting migrants has been approved by the country’s top court, Hungary Today reported.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s government has been strongly critical of EU pushes to resettle refugees and migrants across the continent, going as far as putting up fences on Hungary’s borders with neighbors Serbia and Croatia.
Orban has remained critical of these plans and on Tuesday evening Hungary’s Supreme Court refused to block the decision to hold a national referendum on the issue.
The vote is planned in September or early October, asking Hungarians “Do you want the EU, even without the approval of Hungarian parliament, to be able to prescribe the mandatory resettlement of non-Hungarian citizens in Hungary?”
After receiving approval from Hungary’s top court, the motion for a referendum will now be put to a parliamentary vote, where Orban’s Fidesz party holds a commanding majority. In the likely scenario that it is approved, an exact date will be set.
Opposition parties in Hungary have opposed the idea, with far-right eurosceptic party Jobbik calling for Hungary to refuse the quotas plan outright, without a referendum, news site Politics.hu reported. Meanwhile, the liberal Democratic Coalition warned that the referendum was actually taking Hungary towards leaving the EU.
Case for Not Joining EU Crystal Clear
The case for a UK Brexit is now crystal clear.
The UK’s “opt-out” of such items will not last forever. This is just the beginning of nannycrat nonsense.
London can also expect financial transaction taxes and all sorts of inane wealth redistribution schemes.
In Hungary, the liberal Democratic Coalition warned that the referendum was actually taking Hungary towards leaving the EU.
Hungary’s Referendum Question
Hungary’s Referendum Question: “Do you want the EU, even without the approval of Hungarian parliament, to be able to prescribe the mandatory resettlement of non-Hungarian citizens in Hungary?”
Question Every Nation Needs to Ask
Let’s for a moment presume the US, Mexico, Canada, Honduras, Guatemala were in an “Amero Agreement” with each country having equal say.
Here’s the revised question “Do you want the Mexico, Honduras, and Guatemala, even without the approval of US Congress, to be able to prescribe the mandatory resettlement of non-US citizens in the US?”
That is exactly what’s happening in Europe.
The US would never cede foreign policy to Mexico and Honduras, so why should the UK, Hungary, or Poland cede policy to a group of other nations?
Brexit Odds
ZeroHedge reports Pro-Brexit Leader Jokes “Keep Sending Obama Over” After Surge In Polls
“Brexit leaders are thrilled President Barack Obama came out against them, because they are seeing a bounce in the polls.”
Blackmail
RT offers this perspective: ‘Blackmail’: Eastern European govts lash out at EC’s quota penalty proposal.
Related Posts
- Obama Escalates Brexit Fearmongering Campaign
- The Tampon Tax, Brexit, and Reform Promises
- Six UK Ministers Abandon Cameron in Favor of Brexit
Key quote: “The Americans would never contemplate anything like the EU for themselves or for their neighbors, in their own hemisphere,” said London Mayor Boris Johnson.





Oh wow. This is what wars are made of.
Hold on, lemme get it straight…
Merkel orders 28 shit-sandwiches for a quiet evening of lonely binge-eating, but then she decides to force-feed them to all her “friends” and, if they refuse, to kick the living crap out of them.
Did I get it right? ;-)
Looney
Well Austria said "no" and passed laws restricting refuges http://hedgeaccordingly.com/2016/04/austria-adopts-strict-laws-to-keep-o...
"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force. Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action."
-George Washington
War is coming.
Not one EU-Brussels politican missed even one 7-course dinner and fine wine during the groping, attacking and/or raping of young German and Swedish girls.
No wonder Obama wants to import thousands if not millions moar to the United States and put them in yoru neighborhood. Just like zero politicans suffer under Obamacare non-health insurance, zero politicians will get beaten up, shot or bombed by the rapefugees. They are too insulated and protected as opposed to the wide open hard-working honest American middle class schlep.
The monies collected will be distributed as compensation to the rape victims of the refugees already in the country
The answer is "Do I tell the EU to go fuck themselves, now?", Pat?
The EU is done, finished, kaput, el fin... The only question is which country will tell the IMF to fuck off and exit first...
You are correct!
I think it will be the Eastern European countries...
Cue Brexit, Grexit, Italexit, Spanexit, Franxit, etc.. etc.. etc..
AMF Rot Schild technocrats.
Take your tower of Basel Sprouts and shove it.
The Germans are nuts doing this. Their manufacturing wont be able to compete with the Chinese once they lose the favorable status they have with the EU.
I've been reading about big deals signed by German manufacturers and construction firms with Chinese and others. Germany would get along just fine without the EU. Freed of that yoke, it'd FLOURISH.
Looney, it's worse. Remember that "EU army/border force" that they threatened to create and sieze borders from member states with? The excuse was all the migrants flooding over the border (so *obviously* member states weren't up to the task). A flood that they invited and shoo'ed in. Now this.
A flood they CREATED, invited and shoo'ed in. Aleppo was a modern city with 6 million residents before being attacked by foreign powers with the full knowledge, consent and support of the US.
Now the city is a bombed out ghost town with only around 200,000 "residents" unfortunate enough to reside there.
The US in now run by fucking war criminals that do not deserve the air they breathe.
I pray for justice daily.
No SoilYourselfRotten
The fine monies will be distributed to the rapefugees. It's for the children.
The monies will be distributed to trolls and idiots that work tirelessly to destroy Europe as we know it so Europe TM can be created.
The EU does not give a fuck about rape victims or children. Only the project matters, nothing else.
The breakup of the EU is coming. Probably starting with a Brexit. The peoples of Europe don't want a United States of Europe and want to retain their own sovereignty, languages and legal systems. They don't want or need to be told how to manage their affairs by unelected Bureaucrats in Brussels. The EU was originally conceived as a loose alliance of individual sovereign states trading freely together without tariffs. And that is exactly what it should be and indeed would be were the peoples of Europe ever given a truly democratic say on the matter.
They had a good thing going with the economic union, then they had to let a bunch of politicians and bureaucrats fuck it up.
Or, re-invigorated self-defense laws.
Some laws will be established locally.
Yes. There will be blood.
FMJ: the sooner the better
@HedgeAccordingly
Oh there is a war alright it is on the White Race and the Whites don't even know they are at war!!!
Orbán: Europeans should “throw away political correctness” and shut down migrant invasion
Half of immigrant-led households skirt rules by collecting welfare
90% of US Naturalizations from 3rd World
DER SPIEGEL Interview with Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew: “It’s Stupid to be Afraid” August 08, 2005
The 1965 Immigration Act killed America, the people had no idea.
Bring back the Austro-Hungarian Empire!!
The Jewish role in shaping American immigration policy cannot be ignored.
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/immigration.pdf
Why is the EU failing again?
What is the over under on its demise? 6 months? Holy crap this is stupid.
do you know the history of babylon?
Hahaha $290,000 per person! That's fucking rich. Oh hell - make it an even ONE MILLION!! Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Interesting to watch how they collect any of that.
They can take it from any bank or governement account they want. They belong to the EU .They are part of the Euro system. They also might take it from monthly Euro payments to each country to balance trade.
The Czech Republic and Hungary (wisely) do not use the euro.
It's unclear to me how exactly the Commission would collect.
I am pretty sure you meant to call them commissars.
If it costs 200,000 Euros to turn a migrant away but less than 200,000 Euros to keep a migrant in prison - well guess what will happen.
Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, and Poland have also been wise enough not to adopt the Euro.
That said, I believe Hadja Merkel will try to find other means to punish these Eastern European holdouts.
All the member states are forced to pay taxes to the EUSSR. It then gives an amount back (while wasting the rest). The EUSSR will simply withold some of that tax return. It will then be up to the member state to grow some and deduct a matching amount from the fees it pays the EUSSR.
This would work for UK which pays in £18 billion a year and only gest £9 billion back (though inefficiently spent). However East Europeans pay in a small amount and then get a larger subsidy back. (All spains motorways are built with UK taxes transferred via EU!) So EUSSR can and will blackmail the Eastern countries by witholding subsidies. Will get very interesting.
UK must vote to leave and get back its political and economic freedom from this EU parasitic dictator. By showing such leadership the UK will hearten the small EU states to resist the dictatorship in Brussels.
And will Greece and Italy (and Spain) be charged for each immigrant that heads north? Will allowing to leave a country be deemed to be not taking in? I see immigrant concentration camps in our future, containment for economic purposes, as each immigrant is worth quarter of a million, and will need to be logged and audited on a regular basis.
I can see a whole new department of EU bureaucrats being created - more empire-building for someone.
New income streams to pay for the new department, with most of the funds being used internally for feasibility studies etc, much like foreign investment, which never actually leaves the country of origin.
This is actually clever stuff - somewhere in Brussels, there is a smug middle-management type toasting his newly-minted promotion.
Perhaps Ghordius can explain why this will be good for Europe, and the people of Europe......buggered if I can.
The governments will fork that right over, because they are pussies. So if they refuse 50,000 immigrants, the recalcitrant country will owe 14.5 billion dollars? Sounds pretty steep. That's a lot of money to pay to keep terrorists out. Sounds like the EU is the real problem here. It's called extortion.
Hungary has a real man as Prime Minister. Orban is not a pussy. You probably are one but Orban? He is the real deal, a patriot, and a leader..
Orban paid off Hungary's IMF loans before any other debt...he didn't want to be beholden to them any more than he had to be.
Dear EU Commission.
You first. Or else $290k per person.
So Germany should prepare big monies already for 100,000 migrants they lost, right?
Why not make it a cool billion per and balance the budget? Wankers.
Oh, this will work! I'm going to love watching this Globalist monstrosity collapse upon itself.
Just send them all to Mollenbeek
I bet they no longer wonder what would have happened if Nazi Germany had stayed in power.
Now the dictator has no face.
Nonsense, Europe would stilll be Europe if the National Socialist had won, only legitimately prosperous and cooperative. Jewish Liberal Democracy is just a form of Soviet Marxist governing.
for fuck sake, so nazis would have been free from the corruption that we witness now? kinda true, as all the criminality was legal and lawful under their dictatorship. would any sane person consider that a free society? prosperous? sure.
and FYI, the EU is a nazi consistency plan (the red house report), where getting rid of the nation states was the solution to the predicament the nazis found them self in 1944.
These are the people Germany was trying to stop leading up to WW2. The Jews declared war on Hitler first.
in the long run, they did stay in power (or at the least the idelogy of german supremacy and domination), through the industry and economic planning and cooperation, the fourth right is called european union. of course it has morphed into something quite different (more marxist) than nazis visioned.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1179902/Revealed-The-secret-repo...
http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/articles/Intelligence_Report_EW-P...