For Russia & China, It's "Accept American Hegemony" Or "Go To War"

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Paul Craig Roberts,

Somnolent Europe, Russia, and China - Can the world wake up?

On September 19, 2000, going on 16 years ago, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard of the London Telegraph reported:

“Declassified American government documents show that the US intelligence community ran a campaign in the Fifties and Sixties to build momentum for a united Europe. It funded and directed the European federalist movement.

 

“The documents confirm suspicions voiced at the time that America was working aggressively behind the scenes to push Britain into a European state. One memorandum, dated July 26, 1950, gives instructions for a campaign to promote a fully fledged European parliament. It is signed by Gen. William J. Donovan, head of the American wartime Office of Strategic Services, precursor of the CIA.”

The documents show that the European Union was a creature of the CIA.

As I have previously written, Washington believes that it is easier to control one government, the EU, than to control many separate European governments. As Washington has a long term investment in orchestrating the European Union, Washington is totally opposed to any country exiting the arrangement. That is why President Obama recently went to London to tell his lapdog, the British Prime Minister, that there could be no British exit.

Like other European nations, the British people were never allowed to vote on whether they were in favor of their country ceasing to exist and them becoming Europeans. British history would become the history of a bygone people like the Romans and Babylonians.

The oppressive nature of unaccountable EU laws and regulations and the EU requirement to accept massive numbers of third world immigrants have created a popular demand for a British vote on whether to remain a sovereign country or to dissolve and submit to Brussels and its dictatorial edicts. The vote is scheduled for June 23.

Washington’s position is that the British people must not be permitted to decide against the EU, because such a decision is not in Washington’s interest.

The prime minister’s job is to scare the British people with alleged dire consequences of “going it alone.” The claim is that “little England” cannot stand alone. The British people are being told that isolation will spell their end, and their country will become a backwater bypassed by progress. Everything great will happen elsewhere, and they will be left out.

If the fear campaign does not succeed and the British vote to exit the EU, the open question is whether Washington will permit the British government to accept the democratic outcome.

Alternatively, the British government will deceive the British people, as it routinely does, and declare that Britain has negotiated concessions from Brussels that dispose of the problems that concern the British people.

Washington’s position shows that Washington is a firm believer that only Washington’s interests are important. If other peoples wish to retain national sovereignty, they are simply being selfish. Moreover, they are out of compliance with Washington, which means they can be declared a “threat to American national security.” The British people are not to be permitted to make decisions that do not comply with Washington’s interest. My prediction is that the British people will either be deceived or overridden.

It is Washington’s self-centeredness, the self-absorption, the extraordinary hubris and arrogance, that explains the orchestrated “Russian threat.” Russia has not presented herself to the West as a military threat. Yet, Washington is confronting Russia with a US/NATO naval buildup in the Black Sea, a naval, troop and tank buildup in the Baltics and Poland, missile bases on Russia’s borders, and plans to incorporate the former Russian provinces of Georgia and Ukraine in US defense pacts against Russia.

When Washington, its generals and European vassals declare Russia to be a threat, they mean that Russia has an independent foreign policy and acts in her own interest rather than in Washington’s interest. Russia is a threat, because Russia demonstrated the capability of blocking Washington’s intended invasion of Syria and bombing of Iran. Russia blunted one purpose of Washington’s coup in the Ukraine by peacefully and democratically reuniting with Crimera, the site of Russia’s Black Sea naval base and a Russian province for several centuries.

Perhaps you have wondered how it was possible for small countries such as Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yeman, and Venezuela to be threats to the US superpower. On its face Washington’s claim is absurd. Do US presidents, Pentagon officials, national security advisors, and chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff really regard countries of so little capability as military threats to the United States and NATO countries?

No, they do not. The countries were declared threats, because they have, or had prior to their destruction, independent foreign and economic policies. Their policy independence means that they do not or did not accept US hegemony. They were attacked in order to bring them under US hegemony.

In Washington’s view, any country with an independent policy is outside Washington’s umbrella and, therefore, is a threat.

Venezuela became, in the words of US President Obama, an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States,” necessitating a “national emergency” to contain the “Venezuelan threat” when the Venezuelan government put the interests of the Venezuelan people above those of American corporations.

Russia became a threat when the Russian government demonstrated the ability to block Washington’s intended military attacks on Syria and Iran and when Washington’s coup in the Ukraine failed to deliver to Washington the Russian Black Sea naval base.

Clearly Venezuela cannot possibly pose a military threat to the US, so Venezuela cannot possibly pose an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security of the US.” Venezuela is a “threat” because the Venezuelan government does not comply with Washington’s orders.

It is absolutely certain that Russia has made no threats whatsoever against the Baltics, Poland, Romania, Europe, or the United States. It is absolutely certain that Russia has not invaded the Ukraine. How do we know? If Russia had invaded Ukraine, the Ukraine would no longer be there. It would again be a Russian province where until about 20 years ago Ukraine resided for centuries, for longer than the US has existed. Indeed, the Ukraine belongs in Russia more than Hawaii and the deracinated and conquered southern states belong in the US.

Yet, these fantastic lies from the highest ranks of the US government, from NATO, from Washington’s British lackeys, from the bought-and-paid-for Western media, and from the bought-and-paid-for EU are repeated endlessly as if they are God’s revealed truth.

Syria still exists because it is under Russian protection. That is the only reason Syria still exists, and it is also another reason that Washington wants Russia out of the way.

Do Russia and China realize their extreme danger? I don’t think even Iran realizes its ongoing danger despite its close call.

If Russia and China realize their danger, would the Russian government permit one-fifth of its media to be foreign owned? Does Russia understand that “foreign owned” means CIA owned? If not, why not? If so, why does the Russian government permit its own destabilization at the hands of Washington’s intelligence service acting through foreign owned media?

China is even more careless. There are 7,000 US-funded NGOs (non-governmental organizations) operating in China. Only last month did the Chinese government finally move, very belatedly, to put some restrictions on these foreign agents who are working to destabilize China. The members of these treasonous organizations have not been arrested. They have merely been put under police watch, an almost useless restriction as Washington can provide endless money with which to bribe the Chinese police.

Why do Russia and China think that their police are less susceptible to bribes than Mexico’s or American police? Despite the multi-decade “war on drugs,” the drug flow from Mexico to the US is unimpeded. Indeed, the police forces of both countries have a huge interest in the “war on drugs” as the war brings them riches in the form of bribes. Indeed, as the crucified reporter for the San Jose Mercury newspaper proved many years ago, the CIA itself is in the drug-running business.

In the United States truth-tellers are persecuted and imprisoned, or they are dismissed as “conspiracy theorists,” “anti-semites,” and “domestic extremists.” The entire Western World consists of a dystopia far worse than the one described by George Orwell in his famous book, 1984.

That Russia and China permit Washington to operate in their media, in their universities, in their financial systems, and in “do-good” NGOs that infiltrate every aspect of their societies demonstrates that both governments have no interest in their survival as independent states. They are too scared of being called “authoritarian” by the Western presstitute media to protect their own independence.

My prediction is that Russia and China will soon be confronted with an unwelcome decision: accept American hegemony or go to war.

NOTE: The Saker’s take on Russian media openness to Western anti-Russian propaganda.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
10mm's picture

Time for Russia and China to finger fuck the West.

cheka's picture

these writers...

google 'most favored' and then defend this china-as-enemy crap

partner, not adversary of nyc.dc

enemy = US working class

Twee Surgeon's picture

Enemy = White working man of any class.

 Is it hegemony or hedge fund money, is that an abbreviation ? You must accept it.

stacking12321's picture

another great post from PCR.

he is correct about the us govt's use of NGOs as a way to subvert and overthrow other nations.

james corbett of the corbett report just put out an excellent video on the topic:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCp96gJiF14

NGOs, the Pentagon, and the Human Rights - Industrial Complex
beemasters's picture

"'In the United States truth-tellers are persecuted and imprisoned, or they are dismissed as 'conspiracy theorists','anti-semites,' and 'domestic extremists.'"

Interesting that Paul Craig Roberts slipped "anti-semites" in there. It suggested a lot without saying it.

monad's picture

Hitlery recommends the death sentence for whistleblowers.

Hitlery 2106... right.

NidStyles's picture

The Tribe loves using foreign assets to achieve their goals. It makes easier for them to remain untouched in the aftermath.

This whole east versus west nonsense is just that. Them playing two nations they have financial influence in to coax a false conflict between them. Young aware citizens will die killing each other so that the Tribe can stay on top.

No more Brother's Wars.

Restorative_Ally's picture

We need a genetically engineered disease.

Dear Russian bioweapons labs,...

TahoeBilly2012's picture

ANTI SEMITE ANTI SEMITE ANTI SEMITE neeener neeener neeeener 

WordSmith2013's picture
THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY TO EFFECTIVELY DEAL WITH A CRIMINALLY INSANE PSYCHOPATH

!  !  !

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=37571

Salzburg1756's picture

Yup, "anti-semites"! That's a first for PCR. Congratulations! All aboard!

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

The 'oligarchs' who raped Russia financially in the 90s, in an organized fashion were almost all Jews. Jews were less than 5% of the population, and they had help from western evonomic advisors many or mist of whom were Jews, too.

This is simply a fact - but for various reasons people have been, in essence, brainwashed to think it is 'anti-semitic' to note the wildly disproportionate role/influence of Jews where it makes Jews look like other than Eternal Sacred Victim which is crucial to the Zionist mythos and Jewish 'chosenness' etc. But of course there is also fear of such facts leading to group hatred. The average guy who happens to be Jewish had fuck all to do with the oligarchs which is a fair enough worry..

But the main reason is simply a desire to obfuscate Jewish power.

If you recall the hysteria over the book " The Israel Lobby" it took on a familiar tact - it was 'antisemitic' because it was false - there was no such lobby. But also it wasnt false, it was true, but ascribing to them an evil purpose or outsized power was due to 'canards.'

Tell that to Chas Freeman and Chuck Hagel - the Jewish lobby, adl, aipac, jinsa, and dozens of others get a major quasiveto nd their motivation is to ensure slavish devotion to a tiny foreign state.

Ah, but dual loyalty is somehow a 'canard' too.

wikipedia's entry on 'jewish bolshevism' is a great example of ZiOrwellizing and of course shows the control Jews/Zionists have over wiki. The evidence of a leading role of jews in the Bolsheviks and in their genocide of Russian Christians is overwhleming.

But because it reveals jews as other than Eternal Sacred Victim, and special to God ( books written by jews assure us of it) it MUST be suppressed.

Ditto the Jewishness of the neocons, a word later conflated with 'militarist' generally but one would have to be deliberately dishonest to not know that it was a jewish led movement that essentially argued for interventions superficially for reasons of us security but long on the Israeli Zioglobalist hit list.

These men set up the office of special plans, ledeen, perle, feith, libby, wurmser, and many more, supported by the kristols and krauthammers and novaks and created fake evidence- and they have done the same re Iran's 'nuclear program.'

so I presume the basic thrust is that a lot of the anti-Russian stuff comes from a Zionist 5th column but it is "antisemitic" to say so.

And of course, go ahead and try to find as many msm newssources as you can where Jews (and/or Zionists more broadly) are not owners, managers, content developers etc. go ahead - see what you come up with.

Notably the media in ukraine as well as its government is very largely in the hands if a group comprising less than 1% of the population.

truth = hate when rule is by a hostile minority elite.

SHRAGS's picture

Same theme as the Land Destroyer Report:  Empire's Double Edged Sword: Global Military + NGOs

 

Another good one on Color revolutions as Hybrid War over at the Saker:  Nine theses about the war we are engaged in.

From the article

I would like to remind you that by Helsinki accords (which are now rules of OSCE and UN) the defense of human rights cannot be an exclusive internal business of any state.

 

The Wizard's picture

 

 

And here is another by PCR:

When They Killed JFK They Killed America 

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/05/07/when-they-killed-jfk-they-killed-america-paul-craig-roberts/

I believe we can take it back to the Federalist Papers which so many wish to quote. The anti-Federalist papers exposed those who were trying to destroy the several states and unionize/centralize the power and authority in DC. 

True Blue's picture

Via con huevos -you're toast.

Kirk2NCC1701's picture

Not until they stop letting the West finger their financial prostate.

The 5th Column Decepticons in Russia and its CB have successfully been sowing the seeds of their fiat Red Shield con, and it has taken root in the Russian financial soil.

WVO Biker's picture

I was told most of BALKAN press and TV is in american ownership already.

VWAndy's picture

There are more than just two choices.

DeadFred's picture

Correct. Putin acts like he believes that he only needs to wait. The West is on the verge of imploding and if Putin continues to broker deals and NOT take the bait on each provocation sent his way he wins. So far he's playing an excellent game of chess. He didn't press the advantage in the Ukraine when it was in his hands and he backed off when the recapture of Aleppo was about to ignite a war. It's not cowardice, it's the wisdom of not getting in gunfight with someone bedridden with terminal cancer. Stand back and win.

Colonel Klink's picture

Yep, break us like we broke the USSR, economically.  And they have yet to recover fully.

monk27's picture

The funny part is, we are doing all the heavy lifting in destroying ourselves. They just need to wait out, paciently. Our fuse is burning... we lit it up !

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

ISIS is quite obviously a Frankenstein's monster (or golem) of the US and its allies although we will never know the full contours and it is very likely that this convenient label falsely monolithizes disparate groups of mercenaries, not all takfiri, directed by the us, uk, israel, saudis, etc.

The idea anyone is running a pipeline through a maze of well armed jihadi bantustans is absolutely preposterous. The goal was to stop Iran's pipeline, and to prep Iran for attack, and to ensure that Israel's oil and gas can be sold to a Europe swelled with immigrants. the Oded Yinon plan long called for the destruction of Iraq and Syria and the concept of 'the hornet's nest' has been used to kill Christians and Alawites and Shia and plenty of Sunnis. HATE Islam all you like - ISIS' version is so absurdly cartoonish it exceeds even the fundamentalism of the Wahhabists, its brutality likely designed both to spread terror and to further villify all muslims and Arabs so the murder of tens of thousands is not seen for what it is.

But Frankensteins Monsters don't necessarily stick to the game plan, and sooner or later the controlled fire becomes uncontrolled. Meanwhile the US spends billions on terrorists and floods the region with heavy weapons.

But maybe those antitank and antiaircraft missiles dont stay in the hands of the reliable moderate terrorists... Maybe some target Israeli planes. Maybe some cross the ocean.

Chaos is easy. If history is any guide, Romes always get sacked in the end.

conscious being's picture

Grest posts. Welcome to the party.

jeff montanye's picture

and it's just possible that trump will beat hillary and a shaft of sunlight break through the neoconservative/neoliberal horizon to horizon black clouds.

BlindMonkey's picture

My optimistic side hopes your right.  I support Trump in all his nationalistic glory.  Hell, I'm hoping he picks Bill Still as VP or at least tresury secretary.

 

My pessimistic side looks both ways when crossing a one-way street and thinks the deep state is too dug in and isn't going to let anyone challenge their power.

Restorative_Ally's picture

A guy favored enough to land his own reality TV show and get the overwhelming majority of free TV news time is totally not part of the plan. 

conscious being's picture

jeff, give it up. You are better than that. Don't be a Trumptard. You even watched his AIPAC speech. How can you put up false narratives like that? Or you forgot the /sarc?

tired1's picture

Yep.

The only chance for Trump to be good news is if he's lying through his teeth.

Sad

RiverRoad's picture

"The documents show that the European Union was a creature of the CIA." 

And the Euro was a wonderful place for the US oligarchy to keep their money while flushing the US dollar and US jobs down the toilet.

Parrotile's picture

Putin (and his Senior Command) are fully cognisant of the current situation. They have plenty of information and co-operation from China too (who are equally "in the loop"), and both Countries are overtly (and covertly) preparing for a "real" war (as was mentioned by a ZH commentator a few days ago - Russian overseas Nationals are starting to receive "Call up" papers, as has my Russian Brother-in-Law).

Both Russia and China are best served by delaying action for as long as possible - more time to divert civilian production into War assets - and more time to consolidate strategic battle planning - including Civil Defence:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-defence-usa-idUSKCN0SO2D420151030

There is also the probability that both Countries are planning for a more asymmetric engagement - there are enough Russian and Chinese Nationals in the US who may be inclined to "help out" should the need arise, and because of the "not in MY back yard" mentality where key (but possibly unsightly) infrastructure  is concerned, the Continental USA is a very "target-rich environment" for potential saboteurs.

BarkingCat's picture

If your Russian brother in law was some sort of a Russian asset, you sure as hell would not know about it.

Most Russians in the US would not be working as some subversives.

Most people here enjoy the fact that Putin blocks some of the crazy international agenda out of DC but let's not be delusional.

Life for those Russians in the US is much better than it was in Russia.

They have made an investment into their lives here and are not going to throw it away.

Parrotile's picture

He's more of an "asset" to BNP Paribas Moscow (for the past 25 years or so).

As for the comment that life for Russian ex.pats. in the USA is better than it WAS in Russia,  you'll notice things have changed, and I hope you might realise that Dual Citizenship works the same was as it does for the dual citizens of a certain other Country.

Unlike the very superficial US, Russian family ties run VERY deep, and in times of crisis, these ties will be most useful.

BobEore's picture

CPR writes from the very center of that group tasked with manufacturing a narrative designed to compete with the standard issue msm one.

As such, he represents no less an effort at marketing mythogies than those he appears to oppose. And as with any marketing campaign, the hook or inducement to conversion must be exploited in the target audience - in this case, the "early adopters" in Euro-America, who wish to imagine themselves better informed.

Exactly as with the neo-Marxist[essentially Trotskyite]effort of the 1960's to induce a "counter-cultural" narrative in  previous generation, this new fashioning of the moneypower relies upon the vanities of it's target group; in an age of information,

Everywhere socialization is measured by the exposure to media messages. Whoever is underexposed to the media is desocialized or virtually asocial" Baudrillard

status accrues to those most plugged in to the latest vibe. Roberts et al propose that we view China and Russia as independent actors - on a stage set with "good guy/bad guy" memes. As such, they are partisans to a grand deceit - the deceit that the Chinese, for instance, are any less controlled by the moneypower than the Washington regime or any other western satrapy. Rather than searching out the truth of the situation, his clique peddles an alternate 'brand' of disinformation.

“Information devours its own content. It devours communication and the social…. Rather than creating communication, it exhausts itself in the act of staging communication. Rather than producing meaning, it exhausts itself in the staging of meaning.”

Critical thinking skills: first casualty of the "internet revolution."

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

Eloquent sophistry.

That group B promotes a narrative which contrasts with the dominant narrative of group A does not in and of itself imply anything at all as to the truth value of the narrative.

You left out whether the msm essentially corporate/anglozionist narrative corresponds to the truth, that which is the case, more or less than PCRs - but isn't it odd to neglect the truth value aspect when contrasting 'manufactured' narratives?

Well not if false equivalency is the goal.

And simply because the Chinese and Russians have banks and money doesnt mean they are therefore somehow magically in thrall to 'the same' 'moneypower' indeed the relative independence of their central banks and currencies attests to that (and if it is merely stage acting - well what an expensive and counter-productive one).

Nationalism is a helluva drug.

BobEore's picture

Overreaching in the attempt to imply what I did not say means I should be supposed to have meant something other than what I did indeed say

could indeed be termed ' sophistry,' elegant or otherwise I suppose, but I prefer to remain open to the conclusion that you simply could not find the means to rebut my critique of PCR's message and it's sponsors,

and therefore resorted to a kind of Hail Mary to see if you could make something stick. That's more like awkward polemics. Straw man arguments about Chinese banks seem kind of desperation tactic squire. But if you are serious about debating that particular point, my argument appears here - you are welcome to read and critique when finished - at your leisure, but without snark if possible.

I'm content to suppose that most readers here are unlikely to have gotten bogged down in imaging that questioning one team's presentation requires one to support the other one's position. I think most of us have moved on from that, to realize that it may be important to question the questioners, before signing on their alternative view of things.

Or would you prefer that we hold some to be above question?

 

shovelhead's picture

Yup.

I always apply the vacuous musings of academia to real world situations in order to reach conclusions that "they" are all part of the "disinformation plot".

It makes me feel all warm and snuggly to know that I am the only one that can peer through the morass of deception and see the "truth".

Gee. Welcome aboard. I was beginning to think I was the only one.

jeff montanye's picture

i think obama and hillary are likely to have a morale problem.  i hear more positive statements from many here in the u.s. about putin versus what i hear about them.

i think they both need to get out more.

Savvy's picture

Putin isn't playing chess, he's playing Go. NATO is playing chess.

Implied Violins's picture

I've said this before, and I'll say it again: it is easy to win a game of chess when you are told which moves to make.

Russia has a central bank, yes? Xi has one too, yes? Then applying simple logic - and knowing history - indicates that this global shitstorm INCLUDES China and Russia, playing the role of 'Good Cop.' Brandon Smith has written several articles on this, and has provided more than a little proof, IMHO.

Just check out this chart on the history of the reserve currency and imagine how it might apply to these times:

https://azizonomics.com/2012/01/04/a-history-of-reserve-currencies-in-on...

What is going on now is simply a cyclic process that has gone on since the time of Babylon. The difference is that THIS is the final consolidation. And the globalists are using Russia and China and the BRICS as the 'shining beacon' to head towards while PURPOSEFULLY making things as miserable as possible in the west so that we buy in to their wishes just to make the bullshit STOP.

I mean, just look at the US electoral process - just how divisive is this shit? Do y'all think this isn't planned? It's a part of the process to make the west look bad, and have westerners curse out their OWN SYSTEMS so that when the globalists roll out their solutions, we will 'buy in' - and this will include the BRICS banks and Russia/China as our saviors.

Putin is no saint in this, he is merely playing a role - a role dictated to him from on high by the central banks. Deny this to your own peril.

willwork4food's picture

+10

The idiots that downvoted you have a lot to learn. Putin is worth north of what? $70B? They have had Goldman Sachs on their country financial team since Yellen left. This is a horse & pony show. We will see a NWO within a few years. Our children will grow up in it. Our grandchildren will not know another way of life. One world economic governement based in Basil, authority/military arm will be the UN, or whatever they change the name to. It's coming. Trump will become president. It's amusing that he is a business man ready to spell out the truth to the Americal public when the shit hits the fan, and as a business man he will not pull punches. Get ready for martial law when all hell breaks loose...which it will.

Implied Violins's picture

Unfortunately, you're probably right. The NWO is baked in at this point. I guess the thing to do now is just prepare yourself and purchase the best codpiece money can buy...a gold one, if possible.

The one thing that does have me wondering is this: *is* there a real divide amongst the oligarchs at the highest levels - those who simply want to maintain the 'status quo', and those Satanists/Luciferians who are hell-bent on dominating EVERYTHING and who would rather destroy everyone and everything who won't bend to their will? If this is the case, and Putin is one of those oligarchs who is working towards taking out these pedophiles, then I have to think twice on this. But we shall see, and soon, won't we?

BTW, always enjoy your posts. One of the more open-minded ZHer's and glad when I see you posting.

jeff montanye's picture

the problem i have with the "it's all part of a giant ancient plan, the conflict between u.s./eu and russia/china is fake with the u.n. and basel coming out on top in the end" is the one i have with the existence of god.  where is the evidence of these perfect hands forming events?  

the history of reserve currencies, the original evidence cited, is, to me, the history of real nations competing with each other and going through organic cycles of rise and fall, not some "orchestration of events" by unseen powers.

that and man seems so prone to error.  everybody else i see, world leaders, national security operatives, whoever (almost certainly mossad/likud) planned 9-11, the banksters, make so many mistakes that they are found out in convincing, detailed documentation after, what, a single generation of the new printing press in the hands of the relatively powerless?  can they really want all that dirty laundry flapping on the line?

just doesn't look omnipotent to me.

Nexus789's picture

It looks more like as you describe. A series of cascading events that builds up to a pivotal shift of some sort which is more than likely to be via an economic collapse and/or a military conflict. The notion of a giant plan is a load of bollocks as is the reference to all the god botherer stuff as destiny. 

willwork4food's picture

@ Jeff & Nex- I understand and I even agree that could be the end result. I would state that if you do not believe in a higher power (i.e. God) then it's difficult to grasp what my premise was.

1. China, Russia and the US (west) have basic dictorial powers to control their areas.

2. The current fiat system is doomed to destruction, as debt cannot be forever added beyond actual assets.

3. The logical conclussion is to let the system crash then build the pheonix out of the ashes to the glory of their OWO.

As you say nations don't trust each other all the time and evil tends to destroy itself over time so a ww3 might not be totally out of possibility. But trust me, there is evil there. They bow to a darker force than you and I can imagine. How can you explain Madaline Albright's cavallier comments on over 1/2 million children dying directly from US sanctions? How can Hillary & Bill skate through suspicious deaths within their circle, provable drug smuggeling, directly advocating bombing the shit out of countries that pose no threat to the US and still maintain their innocence? What about Bush & Cheney's smuggness when the 911 tradgedy left thousands of innocent Americans dead with many of those dead fire fighters and brave people trying to help the victims?

They are no human anymore. They have chose to abdigate their humanity for something else. Some want power, some want money, and they'll get it. At a cost.

RaceToTheBottom's picture

All steps toward the total currency reset.  A debt that cannot be paid off, will not be paid off.

It will be resetted to SDR with all central banks playing their parts.  OBTW, it will not be PM based.

Implied Violins's picture

How do you explain the fact that, since at least the 1700's, only *8* families have been in control of the world's money supply?

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-famili...

And if you go farther back, all the way back past Rome, Egypt, Greece etc. to Babylon and Sumer, you can add another five family lines - if you follow the maternal lines, not the paternal.

This shit is cyclical, carried out by the same families who control the money on BOTH sides during the transition; who support BOTH sides; arm BOTH sides; and reconstruct BOTH sides after the conflict - with interest collected, of course. And it occurs like clockwork - always 70 to 100 years, just longer than one human lifetime.

It is a sick cycle of dominance and control, meant to enrich certain 'bloodlines' to the detriment of everyone else, even the psychopaths they pay to do their dirty work (who they always toss under the bus when they are through with them).

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

Do you actually believe that Putin is worth 70 billion?

Whats your source? GATESTONE?

You will have an attempt at one world government. It is easier said than done.

The us government would have confiscated private firearms if they could, they just know that it would lead to so much trouble it would fuck up their 'nation building'.

I will not fire on Americans.

But I will fire on people who fire on Americans, if it comes down to it, and let's hope it won't.

Relatively few people are conducting all this fuckery. Opportunities abound to fuck up their plans non-violently although probably not politically.

Trump is a Potemkin Savior.

Save yourself.

conscious being's picture

Trump is a Potemkin Savior.
Save yourself.

Worth reading more than once.

ack's picture

Precisely. And the Savior wasn't concerned with material salvation. Trump's value was "FUCK YOU DEEP STATE" voting. Now he's being co-opted by DS. So there's diminishing value to his candidacy. Or his win. Pull it. Metaphorically. And be your own SAVIOR. As the Savior admonished mankind to do.