"Government Ain't Fixable But It Will Correct!"

Tyler Durden's picture

Via Monty Pelerin's World,

As the next Presidential election nears, optimism regarding candidates and political parties ebbs and flows. Voters like to believe their candidate sees the problems and will fix them. This fundamental belief drives voting. But what if it isn’t true? What if government ain’t fixable? Or can’t be changed? What then?

Government Ain’t Fixable and People Are Sensing It

charlie_brown_lucy_football-thumb-400x344-441711

The public increasingly recognizes that the opportunity to choose between two candidates is not working very well. The election process allows for a peaceful transfer of power but if the only change is in the the names and placeholders that media refer to as “leaders” But government continues to grow, become more expensive, more intrusive, less responsive and more burdensome. That is the way of government in this country for the half century I have been paying attention.

The quadrennial event that is the Presidential election cycle is akin to Charlie Brown, Lucy and the football. Voters play the role of the hapless Charlie Brown. Lucy represents the political class and the football plays the role of campaign promises. The football is never kicked, altered or used. Yet hapless Charlie falls for the promise again and again.

This election seems different. The public is beginning to understand the game. Some are rebelling. How else does one explain the popularity of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders? H. L. Mencken’s wisdom regarding democracy, politics  and politicians is gaining followers. Mencken’s litany of disgust is too prolific to deal with other than to suggest that the public may be realizing that:

Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.

Increasing numbers understand this observation and that they are the victims in the game.

Government is too large and entrenched to be changed by elections. The political establishment considers themselves to be privileged and pretends to like and tolerate citizens. The truth is that the citizenry are nothing more than a commodity to the rulers. Their votes and pocketbooks are mined so that political lifestyles can be continued.

This reality is becoming apparent to more and more citizens who recognize the government as Lucy and themselves as Charlie Brown. The football is always promised but never delivered. The story of this election is the number of people dissatisfied with Lucy and her behavior. In a sense this election is beginning to look like a protest similar to the Boston Harbor tea party. It is likely a precedent that will not directly change anything,  although the retrospective of history may recognize it as the first shot fired in the coming rebellion against oppressive government.

 

Government Will Correct

No one can fix government. Even if Donald Trump or Hillary/Bern were the best managers in the world, they could only have a marginal impact even if they were inclined.

Government is too far gone and too deeply entrenched. It is a gigantic blob immune to common sense, cost control or the will of the citizens it pretends to serve. People are expected to serve it, a complete contradiction of the stated goal of the Founders. It grows and enriches itself (and its members) simply because it can.  It is no different from an unaccountable criminal enterprise, exempting itself from laws it imposes on others. In point of fact, it is less efficient than organized crime which must generate a profit under less than ideal circumstances. Most Mafia-run businesses provide a service or value to their customers in excess of what it costs. Government has no need to do so and is especially ineffective and inefficient.

Government is Leviathan. It looks out for itself and no one person or small group can alter that condition. Government will correct, but not willingly. Today it is at the point where the plant from Little Shop of Horrors was in this clip:

The conflicted Seymour represents the citizens of this country, subject to increasing demands and monetary contributions. Both the plant and the government demand contributions while provide little service or benefits in return. Government is as addicted to more every bit as much as the demanding plant. It knows no other way other than to spend to continue its scam.

Government ain’t fixable but it will correct because there are limits to what people and economies will bear. Government is out of money and hopelessly indebted. Yet it continues to spend as if it had the money. It has seriously wounded the host on which it parasitically survives. The golden goose no longer can shake off the effects of the government burden. The economy is stagnant. Confiscatory taxation and regulatory burdens prevent private capital formation. Without capital, standard of living and employment stagnate. The economy will continue to deteriorate and people will continue to become poorer until the system collapses of its own weight or the people revolt. Either represents a cataclysmic event!

For a time monetary printing can disguise the deterioration. States and municipalities are unable to print money. Their unnecessary and wasteful schemes are surfacing. Puerto Rico demands a bailout. So will Illinois and dozens of other governmental entities. California is driving its productive class away. That is also happening at the Federal level where both people and companies are voting with their feet. The renouncement of US citizenship is exploding as is the relocation of corporate headquarters out of this country.

Government as we know it is doomed. It will not recognize this reality until markets and/or citizens force it. This time is likely close and the process will not be painless. The more government ignores what is inevitable the greater the pain will be. One hopes that civilization does not enter an economic and anarchical Dark Ages. To the extent that government refuses to respond to the fantasy world they have created, the more likely that is to be the outcome.

While many still think their vote matters, others are beginning to recognize the futility of voting.

Government is Bad at Almost Everything

Everyone has heard more than their share of stories about government inefficiency and stupidity. It is difficult to point to any government agency run effectively or achieving the ends for which it was created. The War on Poverty has increased poverty. The Department of Education was formed at the peak of educational effectiveness and everything has gone downhill since. What does the Department of Energy do besides make it more difficult to achieve more energy? The Internal Revenue Service has become a political tool to hammer opponents who do not hold the presidency. Hasn’t the Veteran’s Administration done a wonderful job for the medical care of our veterans? ObamaCare has driven health-care costs through the roof and put a damper on the creation of jobs like nothing else.

And now this inefficiency seems to be reaching new heights in the TSA, the agency that fails miserably on routine tests to find contraband and other items prohibited. Now we are told that this agency is going to impose the loss of millions of hours of wait time because it cannot do its job properly. The following video shows what is coming:

All the money being spent on preventing terrorism has not stopped one terrorist act at an airport. If you are a traveler, you are more likely to become a terrorist as a result of treatment by your own government than to be protected from terrorism.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
LetThemEatRand's picture

"Confiscatory taxation and regulatory burdens prevent private capital formation."

Yeah, tell that to the few hundred families that control the majority of the world's wealth.   Taxes and regulations are currently designed to concentrate wealth among a few private individuals.  Our elected government has become a means to that end, but it was also that way a long time before America or other "free" societies existed.  I suppose the Kings used to call taxes "tribute." 

The problem is the sociopaths.  So long as we allow them to exist and rule us, we shall be slaves.  But let's debate candidates and isms instead. 

malek's picture

Didn't you forget to mention that the only way to not be a sociopath is to accept one has to follow the social contract - which you somehow signed before being born?

At least according to you.
And people like Ayn Rand who questioned that line of thought are... <here you can take over>

LetThemEatRand's picture

If you live in the woods by yourself and you don't affect your nearest neighbor, you are free.  Otherwise, there is the fact that what you do affects others, and vice-versa.  That is all the social contract means.

 

philipat's picture

The article, pehaps somewhat arrogantly. equates the US with civilization. Using USG and civilization in the same sentence is oxymoronic.

malek's picture

Nice dancing around the elephant, LTER.

Tell us one more time explicitly:
You believe the "social contract" means "my freedom ends where it cuts into your freedom" and nothing more?   And you are/would be willing to argue against any more sweeping interpretation?

Farqued Up's picture

I'm sure Randy Weaver may offer an asterisk to that opinion. The US Gov killed his wife kid and dog for the sin of sawing a shotgun barrel off. The Karl Marx Unibomber killed several through mail bombs and is being afforded 3 hots and a cot to this day.

mary mary's picture

Okay.  Thanks.  Sociopaths are biologically different.  Their brains are different.  It has nothing to do with signing anything.

flaminratzazz's picture

The _paths have always ruled. That is the way. To be a ruler one has to be evil wicked mean and nasty or they are replaced by someone with these attributes.

 

The real problem lies at the fatal flaw in humanity itself. we as a specie, that should know better destroys everything around us and call it good.

 

We strip mine the planet, destroy the oceans, ground, air and waters, all for digits in a computer bank. THAT my friend is madness.

LetThemEatRand's picture

Mankind is flawed to be sure, but the root problem is not that we destroy.  We also create, just as the earth itself does both.  The earth can create a fire, and then regrow.   We can plant trees and crops after a fire we set to increase productivity of the land.

The root problem is that we tend to follow those who destroy more than those who create.  A few times throughout history we as a species have found a balance. 

mary mary's picture

I would not say humans create.  I would say humans select, rearrange, and destroy.  From a standpoint of the other 99.999999% of the species on the planet, humans have not made the world a better place, always a worse one.  What humans could do, however, to start earning their keep, is to stop pumping out so many babies, so they could slowly get control of their numbers, the same way a family would tear up its credit cards, so it can slowly get control of its finances.  The planet needs 50% of its land and 50% of its water untouched in any way by humans.  With 7 billion humans, that is mathematically impossible.  But humans have the intelligence, though apparently not the empathy, to reduce their numbers to those which would make this mathematically possible.

Farqued Up's picture

Since there are high percentages of humans that are depraved psychopaths that will always seek to control, the ONLY problem with the world is the existence of governments. No way vigilantes could have killed 100 million people in the 20th Century alone.

Eliminate all governments, laws, cops, courts, jails and arm everybody with the highest firepower he can afford. Have private companies that record deeds, brand anything that moves, livestock to 18 wheelers, and vigilante any bastard that steals it.

You betchie there will be wrongful deaths but not 100 million of mostly innocents. You want a highway, pool money and put in a tollway, user pays. Same for schooling and other functions, user pays. The Golden Rule will become instantly in vogue for the first time ever. That 90 year old grandma will not be raped, the family and friends will hunt him down and hang his STUFF on his front porch.

gotgold's picture

HillBill 2016. Bring back the grifters....
They will save us....

rejected's picture

Look at those idiots standing in line to get frisked.

Can you believe it!  Just to get on a dirty stinky tube crammed like sardines.

Americans,,, creme de la creme of stupidity.

two hoots's picture

The gov will correct after it sucks all meaningful value from its citizens. Then it will begin eating its own from low to high.

mosfet's picture

Article V Convention.  New Hampshire's up next, then 30 left to go till lights out for the lobbyists.

// Did you know that only 50K signatures are needed to contest a vote by the Swiss Gov.  White House requires 2X that just to illicit a response and then they promptly ignore it.

Stormtrooper's picture

We have Senator Kevin Faber blocking the next step of an Ariticle V in Ohio by not agreeing to give our HJR3 an airing in the Senate when it is passed by the House of Representatives.

We had hoped to be number 5 to adopt COS but now we have to fight battles to get our state reps to recognize that it is time for the adults to step into the room and decide whether we even need a federal government, and if so, how should it be modified to represent the states as it was originally created to do.

Government needs you to pay taxes's picture

'Find' and report a few kilos of cocaine at his primary residence . . . works for US 'law enforcement'. 

johnnyyuma's picture

Careful what you advocate for. COS could be the end of the US Constitution AND the Bill of Rights. Lobbyists would not be the only concern addressed.

gcjohns1971's picture

Presumably you mean more ended than they are now.

But it is a specious argument.

The choice is Convention or Force.

If the convention runs awry, Force is still possible.

tlnzz's picture

It's not the Government you see that is the one to worry about. They are the jackals and puppets. It's the "Deep State" that's in control. That doesn't change with elections. 

gregga777's picture

Revolution is the only solution. But, I'm extremely pessimistic that pussified Americans, who volunteer to be terrorized by TSA burger-flipping rejects have the balls to stand up for themselves.

The Merovingian's picture

There will be no revolution, there will simply be a reset. Presuming, of course, that the solar flare is big enough to kill the grid, kill the TeeVee, kill the GPS, kill the gadgets, shut off the EBT, etc. And then just sit back and wait for everyone to eat each other.

ebworthen's picture

Government, run by the banks/corporations/insurers.

Tear the fucker down!!!

ZD1's picture

 

 

Tear it down and replace it with what?

Maybe you prefer authoritarian, dictatorial, totalitarian government run by communist dictators and their cronies?

No thanks!

johnnyyuma's picture

I would like to replace it with the US Constitution. You know that thing they ALL swear to support and defend from all enemies. Foreign and domestic. Where the powers of the Federal Government are few and defined. All other authority is reserved for the states or to the people.

Winston Churchill's picture

You are under a great misaprehension as to what the US constitution is.

It was written by oligarchs for oligarchs.It was as counter revolutionary as October 1917.

Be careful what you wish for.Even

Lysander Spooner knew the constitution was a failure back in the 1850's.

It needs enforcement teeth added to it at a minimum.

DaBard51's picture

Give the voters some credit... they created the state of perpetual gridlock between Executive and Legislative branches of Federal government to keep the feds from screwing things up any worse than they are already.

But voters seemed to underestimate the cleverness of motivated, determined fools.

When nine hundred years old you become, look this good you will not.

jcdenton's picture

We don't have a govt ..

 

 

It is that plain and simple ..

There will be no election ..

It is ALL -- theater ..

https://youtu.be/C2N1Z8M4xBA?t=1h

Has been for some time ..

 

Time to wake from your slumber ..

Paul Kersey's picture

The Government Class folks have succeeded wildly in perpetuating themselves, growing their numbers, enriching themselves and in increasing their power through taxation, regulation and though revolving door, high power/high pay private contracting jobs. It is no surprise that "six of the top-ten richest counties in America are in Virginia and Maryland, and 13 of the top-30 richest counties form a continuous circle around the nation's capital". The Government Class folks ain't living in Flint, MI or Camden, NJ.

VWAndy's picture

 Yep think about that stall thing. Its way better than blowin everything up.

  There is this trick bad people do. They set up thier victems.

Cabreado's picture

What is this thing you call "government," and why all at once do you neglect its importance on a smallest scale to help with obvious things required of any organization, and hesitate to recognize criminals and imposters who hide behind "government" with malicious intent or simply self-preservation?

You too, then, provide cover for the criminals, by implicating "government."

NoWayJose's picture

We just need to go back to being 50 states that are united, rather than being one country ruling and controlling 50 states. The country is so divided that there can never be any peaceful resolution of the differences. Do rather than trying to enforce them on all 50 states, we need to let each state have more power over themselves and be able to pass their own laws for bathroom usage.

Strode2's picture
Strode2 (not verified) May 22, 2016 4:20 AM

Usury is a Jew invention. They started back in Biblical times. The MONEY CHANGERS were thrown out of the temple. They were Jews. Even the Magna Carta provided protections against usury and the Satanic Jews were doing the same crap back then. Shakespeare did NOT write the "Merchant of Venice" on a whim... it was based on the common Jew practices of the day. They were discriminated against because back then they were the same slime they are today....

This is history folks.

If you want to open your eyes as to why our stable society has been turned upside down, read this entire post to get some of the dots to connect the big picture as to what is really happening. These are all FACTS.

They have been ejected over 100 times from other countries for doing exactly what they are doing to this country. For meddling in the affairs of stable societies and defrauding stable governments for the last 1500 years. Less than 2% of the population control or influence everything you think and do. It is ***NOT*** because they are smarter, they have a plan to exploit the goy worldwide (NWO) and use money and family names to be well connected and manipulative. They have deceptively used your own religion (and god which they do not believe in) to brainwash you into revering them.
They are NOT your friends, as taken from one of their own websites....
----->> http://www.aishdas.org/avodah/faxes/mmOnNachriim.pdf <<-----

"If a Jew is chasing a gentile in order to murder him, it is forbidden to kill the Jew in order to save the gentile, even if there is no other way to save the gentile's life. A person who kills the Jewish pursuer in order to save the gentile's life must be put to death. But if a gentile (or a Jew) is chasing a Jew in order to murder him, one must kill the pursuer in order to save the pursued person (if there is no other way to save his life). This law applies to a germ to shav as well. Sources:  Minchat Chinuch commandment 600"

"2.2) in a commercial transaction, if a Jew charges an exorbitant price or conceals the low quality of the goods from a gentile customer he does not owe the gentile any             compensation (as he would owe a Jewish customer). According to some opinions, it appears that this law is not applied to a germ to shav; it is forbidden to cheat him and                therefore he must be compensated if he is cheated. In any case, it is clear that if a gentile charges an exorbitant price or conceals the low quality of the goods from a Jewish customer, he owes the Jew compensation.
Sources:
Babylonian Talmud Tractate Bechorot 13b Maimonides, Laws of Sales 13:7 Tur Choshen Mishpat 227:30
Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat 227:26 Minor Tractates, Tractate Gerim chapter 3
Palestinian Talmud Tractate Yevamot chapter 8 8d: 1"

"2.3) When a Jew owes money to a gentile who has passed away, the Jew is not obliged to repay the debt to the heirs, provided the latter do not know about the debt. If the heirs ask the Jew whether he owed money to the deceased, it is even permissible to lie to them and deny the debt (provided the Jew knows for sure that they do not know about the debt, so that the name of G-d will not be profaned by his lie). Sources: Shulchan Aruch Choshen Mishpat 283:1 Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 182:4 (uncensored edition included on the DBS version 9 CD)"

There are many more enlightening things on that PDF file for you (the GOYIM) to read ALL of it to understand how deceptive and knifing they really are.

WHO CONTROLS THE U.S.A.  List Summaries
 NTERNET

Who Controls E-Bay? Summary:  Of the nine (9) eBay executives, six (6) are Jews. This is a numerical
representation of 67%. Of the eleven 11) eBay directors, two (2) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 18%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the eBay executives by a factor of 33.5 times (3,350 percent) and over-represented among the eBay directors by a factor of 9 times (900 percent).

Who Controls Apple?
Summary: Of the ten (10) Apple executives, three (3) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 30%. Of the eight (8) Apple directors, five (5) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 63%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over represented among the Apple executives by a factor of 15 times (1,500 percent) and over-represented among the Apple directors by a factor of 31.5 times (3,150 percent).

Who Controls Yahoo?
Summary: Of the thirteen (13) Yahoo! executives, eight (8) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 62%. Of the eleven (11) Yahoo! directors, five (5) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 45%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Yahoo! executives by a factor of 31 times (3,100 percent) and over-represented among the Yahoo! directors by a factor of 22.5 times (2,250 percent).

Who Controls Google?
Summary: Of the six (6) Google executives, four (4) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Of the ten (10) Google directors, four (4) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 40%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Google executives by a factor of 33.5 times (3,350 percent) and over-represented among the Google directors by a factor of 20 times (2,000 percent).

Who Controls Amazon?
Summary: Of the eleven (11) Amazon.com executives, eight (8) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 73%. Of the nine (9) Amazon.com directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Amazon.com executives by a factor of 36.5 times (3,650 percent) and over-represented among the Amazon.com directors by a factor of 33.5times (3,350 percent).

Who Controls Facebook?
Summary: Of the three (3) Facebook executives, three (3) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 100%. Of the seven (7) Facebook directors, four (4) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the Facebook executives by a factor of 50 times (5,000 percent) and over-represented among the Facebook directors by a factor of 28.5 times (2,850 percent).

THE DEATH OF AMERICA was enacted in 1965 with the signing of the Open Immigration Law of 1965.While serving Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law of 1965 was the beginning of America as death as a unified nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and bribing" the law into existence with the fanaticism equaling the most dedicated Muslim terrorist.

Jews have continually evinced hostility toward American Christian culture in their aggressive efforts to change it.

The Open Immigration Law of 1965 is a prime example of that hostility. A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJCongress:

Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism."

Here Are the Names of the Jewish People Behind the Open Immigration Law of 1965:
1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of the Council of Foreign Relations) * Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled 'Let us open the gates' that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.

* Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the "Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill, the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.* Leo Pfeffer, wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for
open immigration.* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish neo-con, also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.

*Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the Bnai Brith, (there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.

THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.

Most of these immigrants come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling Western Civ. Within the context of a Jewish-informed "multicultural America," these immigrants are encouraged by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.

Who Controls Microsoft?
Summary: Of the seventeen (17) Microsoft executives, six (6) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 35%. Of the nine (9) Microsoft directors, five (5) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 56%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the Microsoft executives by a factor of 17.5 times (1,750 percent) and over-represented among the Microsoft directors by a factor of 28 times (2,800 percent).

Who Controls Wikimedia?
Summary: Of the seventeen (17) Wikimedia senior staff and trustees, five (5) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 29%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the Wikimedia senior staff and trustees by a factor of 14.5 times (1,450 percent).

MEDIA

Who Controls Big Media?
Summary: Of the twelve (12) senior executives of the "Big Six" media corporations, nine (9) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 75%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the "Big Six" media corporations by a factor of 37.5 times (3,750 percent).

Who Controls Hollywood?
Summary: Of the sixty (60) senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies, fifty (50) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are
approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Hollywood studios, trade unions, and talent agencies by a factor of 41.5times (4,150 percent).

Who Controls Television?
Summary: Of the sixty-four (64) senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks, and production companies, fifty-seven (57) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical
 representation of 89%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.  population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major television broadcast networks, cable networks, and production companies by a factor of 44.5 times (4,450percent).

Who Controls Music?
Summary: Of the fifty (50) senior executives of the major music labels and trade organizations, thirty-nine (39) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 78%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.  population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major music labels and trade organizations by a factor of 39 times (3,900 percent).

Who Controls Radio?
Summary: Of the forty-six (46) senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners, twenty-eight (28) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 61%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major radio broadcast networks and station owners by a factor of 30.5 times (3,050 percent).

Who Controls Advertising?
Summary: Of the forty-six (46) senior executives of the major advertising corporations and trade associations, thirty-one (31) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 67%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major advertising corporations and trade associations by a factor of 33.5 times (3,350 percent).

Who Controls the News? (Part 1)
Summary:  Of the sixty-seven (67) senior executives of the major television and radio news networks, forty-seven (47) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 70%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major television and radio news networks by a factor of 35 times (3,500 percent).

Who Controls the News? (Part 2)
Summary:  Of the sixty-five (65) senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines, forty-two (42) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major newspapers and news magazines by a factor of 32.5 times (3,250 percent).

BANKING
Who Controls the Economy?
Summary:
Of the sixty (60) senior officials of the U.S. Government economic, financial, and monetary institutions, thirty-nine (39) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are
approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior officials of the U.S. Government economic, financial, and monetary institutions by a factor of32.5 times (3,250 percent).

Who Controls Wall Street? (Part 1)
Summary:  Of the fifty-one (51) senior executives of the major Wall Street banks, trade exchanges, and regulatory agencies, thirty-seven (37) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 72%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Wall Street banks, trade exchanges, and regulatory agencies by a factor of 36 times (3,600 percent).

Who Controls Wall Street? (Part 2)
Summary:  Of the forty (40) senior executives of the major Wall Street mutual funds, private equity funds, hedge funds, and brokerages, twenty-six (26) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major Wall Street mutual funds, private equity funds, hedge funds, and brokerages by a factor of 32.5 times (3,250 percent).

Who Controls Goldman Sachs?
Summary: Of the nine (9) Goldman Sachs executives, seven (7) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 78%. Of the twelve (12) Goldman Sachs directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 50%. Of the thirty-three (33) Goldman Sachs management committee members, twenty (20) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 61%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Goldman Sachs executives by a factor of 39 times(3,900 percent), over-represented among the Goldman Sachs directors by a factor of 25 times(2,500 percent), and over-represented on the Goldman Sachs management committee by a factor of 30.5 times(3,050 percent).

Who Controls JPMorgan Chase?
Summary: Of the ten (10) JPMorgan Chase Operating Committee members, nine are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 90%. Of the eleven (11) JPMorgan Chase directors, six (6) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 45%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the JPMorgan Chase Operating Committee members by a factor of 45 times (4,500 percent) and over-represented among the JPMorgan Chase directors by a factor of 22.5 times (2,250 percent).

Who Controls American International Group?
Summary: Of the sixteen (16) directors and trustees of American International Group, twelve (12) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 75%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the directors and trustees of American
 international Group by a factor of 37.5 times (3,750 percent).

Who Controls the Treasury Department?
Summary: Of the twenty-six (26) U.S. Treasury Department senior officials, eighteen (18) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 69%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Treasury Department senior officials by a factor of 34.5 times times (3,450 percent).

Who Controls the Federal Reserve System?
Summary: Of the seven (7) Federal Reserve Board governors, four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Of the twelve (12) Federal Reserve District Bank presidents, four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 33%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors by a factor of 28.5 times (2,850 percent), and over-represented among the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents by a factor of 16.5 times (1,650 percent).

GOVERNMENT
Who Controls the White House?
Summary:  Of the eleven (11) current and former senior advisors of President Barack Obama, nine (9) are Jews, partial Jews, or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 82%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the current and former senior advisors of President Barack Obama by a factor of 41 times (4,100 percent).

Who Controls the Senate?
Summary:  Of the twenty (20) U.S. Senate Committee chairmen, eight (8) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 40%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Senate Committee chairmen by a factor of 20 times (2,000 percent).

Who Controls the Congress?
Summary: Of the forty-two (42) U.S. House Committee chairmen and ranking members, six (6) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 14%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. House Committee chairmen and ranking members by a factor of 7 times (700 percent).

Who Controls the Supreme Court?
Summary:  Of the nine (9) U.S. Supreme Court justices, four (4) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 44%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Supreme Court justices by a factor of 22 times (2,200 percent).

Who Controls the State Department?
Summary:  Of the seventy-four (74) U.S. State Department senior officials, forty (40) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 54%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.  population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the U.S. State Department senior officials by a factor of 27 times (2,700 percent).

Who Controls the Justice Department?
Summary: Of the forty-seven (47) U.S. Justice Department senior officials, twenty-two (22) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 47%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.
population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Justice Department senior officials by a factor of 23.5times (2,350 percent).

Who Controls the Defense Department?
Summary: Of the one-hundred eleven (111) U.S. Defense Department senior officials, forty (40) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is numerical representation of 36%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Defense Department senior officials by a factor of 18 times (1,800 percent).

Who Controls the Treasury Department?
Summary:  Of the twenty-six (26) U.S. Treasury Department senior officials,  eighteen  (18) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 69%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the U.S. Treasury Department senior officials by a factor of 34.5 times times (3,450 percent).

GLOBALISM
Who Controls the Group of Thirty?
Summary: Of the forty-three (43) Group of Thirty members, twenty-three (23) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 53%. Jews are approximately .25% of the world population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Group of Thirty members by a factor of 212 times (21,200 percent).

Who Controls the Bilderberg Group?
Summary: Of the thirty-five (35) Bilberberg Steering Committee members, sixteen (16) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 46%. Jews are approximately 1% of the population of the Western world. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented on the Bilderberg Steering Committee by a factor of 46 times (4,600 percent).

Who Controls the Trilateral Commission?
Summary: Of the fifty-six (56) Trilateral Commission Executive Committee members, twenty-three (23) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 41%. Jews are approximately .25% of the world population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented on the Trilateral Commission Executive Committee by a factor of 164 times (16,400 percent).

Who Controls the Council on Foreign Relations? (Part 1)
Summary: Of the forty-three (43) Council on Foreign Relations directors, twenty-eight (28) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 65%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Council on Foreign Relations directors by a factor of 32.5times (3,250 percent).

Who Controls the Council on Foreign Relations? (Part 2)
Summary: Of the fifty-five (55) Council on Foreign Relations think tank members, thirty-one (31) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 56%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented in the Council on Foreign Relations think tank by a factor of 28times (2,800 percent).

SOCIETY
Who Controls the Ivy League?
Summary: Of the twenty-four (24) senior administrators of the Ivy League colleges and universities, twenty (20) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior administrators of the Ivy League colleges and universities by a factor of 41.5 times (4,150 percent).

Who Controls the Think Tanks?
Summary: Of the thirty (30) senior executives of the major think tanks, eighteen (18) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 60%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S.  population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major think tanks by a factor of 30times (3,000 percent).

Who Controls Professional Sports?
Summary: Of the sixty (60) senior executives of the major sports leagues, talent
agencies, and media outlets, forty-three (43) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 72%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the major sports leagues, talent agencies, and media outlets by a factor of 36 times (3,600 percent).

Who Controls the Anti-Defamation League?
Summary: Of the fifty-three (53) executives and directors of the Anti-Defamation League, fifty-three (53) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of100%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives and directors of the Anti-Defamation League by a factor of 50 times (5,000 percent).

Who Controls the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Summary: Of the twenty-two (22) Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff members, fifteen (15) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 68%. Of the thirteen (13) Southern Poverty Law Center directors, eight (8) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 62%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Southern Poverty Law Center senior program staff members by a factor of 34 times (3,400 percent), and over-represented among the Southern Poverty Law Center directors by a factor of 31 times (3,100 percent).

Who Controls the American Civil Liberties Union?
Summary: Of the nine (9) executives of the American Civil Liberties Union, four (4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 44%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews are over-represented among the executives of the American Civil Liberties Union by a factor of 22 times (2,200 percent).

Who Controls the Defense Policy Board?
Summary:  Of the twenty-two (22) Defense Policy Board members, fourteen (14) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 64%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. * Therefore Jews and spouses of Jews are over-represented among the Defense Policy Board members by a factor of 32 times (3,200 percent).

The Jews have mostly been parasites in every host nation kind enough to take them in. They always use their money to take over the banking industry of that nation, and then start buying all the politicians with their ill-gotten gains. Then they start pornography, and homosexuality.

Then they take over the main stream media, education, and newspapers until degradation brings that nation to its knees. And collapse sets in.

Jewish Bankers and Speculation people destroy/enslave the world.

The ownership of the 10 major Central banks is:
1. Rothschild Bank of London
2. Warburg Bank of Hamburg
3. Rothschild Bank of Berlin
4. Lehman Brothers of New York
5. Lazar Brothers of Paris
6. Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York (Now Shearson American Express)
7. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
8. Goldman, Sachs of New York
9. Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
10. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is centrally controlled by Nathan M. Rothschild & Sons of London.

The names of these banks, except Chase Manhattan-Rockefellers, are all obviously Jewish names and the Rothschild name was originally Bauer.

Jubal Early's picture

I considered down voting you because your post is soooo long.  However, everything is true, so I was forced to up vote you.  Yes, there could be no shadow government without the jews knowing about it and controlling it.

Pumpkin's picture

I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars--I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.

moneybots's picture

"These are all FACTS."

These are all your propaganda.

Socratic Dog's picture

Great post, in terms of content.  Thanks.

References please...anywhere I can go to look up this stuff easily and with some assurance it's correct?  Or do I have to do the legwork myself?

I'm a bit surprised ALL the central bankers aren't jews. I guess the ownership (jew banks) is more important than the public faces.

And finally, if your representation numbers are anywhere near accurate, we (non-jews, fuck their language) have a bit of a problem, and it's hard to argue otherwise.  If they were all muzzies, or dindus, or white males, do you think the sheeple would all be in ignorance of it?  I think not.

Farqued Up's picture

I'll be dipped, is the Klan correct when they refer to the 3 branches as ZOG, or, Zionist owned government?

GreatUncle's picture

If you are a traveler, you are more likely to become a terrorist as a result of treatment by your own government than to be protected from terrorism.

A sweet comparison and why so many UK citizens would be branded NVE's by the UK government.

johnnyyuma's picture

Convention of States would be the surest way to destroy what little remains of the US Constitution. 

Last of the Middle Class's picture

The pain is coming. 8 years of printing money to cover has run its course. The problem still remains and is much worse for the banker inspired cover up propaganda stream. Now it's us against them and someone somewhere is going the pain. Government that is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the wealthy can never suddenly "find" the solution. This is going to be interesting, if not positively catastrophic.

John C Durham's picture

Well, I have a different take. Until the People force the government to straighten out those who have REPLACED normal market transactions with a criminal dominated FIXED market there will be no improvement.

What do you suggest when you say The People do something? A civil war? No, The People already have done something.

Only have one mechanism will work: our government. So, it is foolish to suggest that the government is "the problem".

Large business always has been the problem and always will be. The government (A Republic) is to protect The People from criminals. Always has been and always will be.

south40_dreams's picture

We no longer have a "market", we have our daily ration

Haraklus's picture

What do you do with your daily ration?

BingoBoggins's picture

Who enables Big Business? Therein lies the answer. Some restaints are needed.

 lobbyists, term limits, donations, somebody pile on here if you've got something

 

Vidar's picture

Government is nothing more than the largest criminal enterprise in a given territory. Businesses are ultimately only private individuals and can only get away with crime when empowered by government. The "Big Lie" of governmental legitimacy allows those who use the name government to claim the right to commit acts that everyone knows are wrong and criminal. If it is wrong for the individual, it is wrong for the group. Numbers grant no rights. All government actions are crimes: taxation == theft, law enforcement == assault/kidnapping/murder, regulations == slavery. The cycle will continue until the human race realizes that we are all private individuals and that the absolute rule of private property is the only way to organize society.

https://mises.org/library/anatomy-state-1

https://mises.org/library/democracy-god-failed-1

 

artichoke's picture

You seem to think the government represents the people.  This has run quite far off the rails for quite a while.  Maybe it was always off the rails, but now it's so powerful that the damage already done is enormous (the American population never had a desire to destroy Iraq and Libya and restore opium production in Afghanistan) and the risks to the future probably even greater.

south40_dreams's picture

If Hillary is declared POTUS in the fall in spite of overwhelming polling for Trump.....well Houston, we have a problem

Niall Of The Nine Hostages's picture

On the contrary, government works very well at what it's actually designed to do---keep the elites rich and immune from the consequences of their actions, and put down any attempts at rebellion by the tax- and debt-peons who do all the work. 

Yes, it will fall apart when there is nothing left to steal. By then the elites plan on being long gone, leaving their former debt-peons to die of hunger and plague. The elite are always the last to notice the stink when they foul the nest. They're always the first to fly away.

gdpetti's picture

The real elite.... not the 'establishment' which acts as pawns for this puppet show. They are always expendable, though they think of themselves as 'masters of the universe'... they remain sheep like the rest of the herd and will suffer the same fate.. eventually, as this process takes a eon or two to complete the cycle, said to start 'soon'... sort of like these markets, we all know they will collapse and try as they might, they simply cannot put Humpty Dumpty back together again... and they haven't been given a ticket to Hogwarts, though they think themselves to be magical, those that are don't need to ask, don't need to act as puppets. It's a choice these puppets aren't capable of making, but yes, they are tools to control the masses, to feed off of them, same as always.