Trump Escalates Clinton Attack, Calls Vince Foster Suicide "Very Fishy"

Tyler Durden's picture

Just hours after Donald Trump released a clip in which the presumptive Republican presidential candidate hinted at Bill Clinton's sexual transgressions which featured audio of two women - Kathleen Willey and Juanita Broaddrick - who have made rape accusations against Bill Clinton, Trump escalated his attack on Hillary and Bill Clinton in an interview with WaPo in which Trump called the circumstances of Vincent Foster’s death "very fishy."

"He had intimate knowledge of what was going on," Trump said of Foster’s relationship with the Clintons. "He knew everything that was going on and then all of a sudden he committed suicide."

As a reminder, Vince Foster, a longtime friend of the Clintons, was deputy White House counsel in the first few months of Clinton’s presidency.  He was found dead from a gunshot wound to the mouth in July 1993. The three official investigations into Foster’s death concluded he committed suicide as he suffered from depression, however unproven theories have constantly swirled that the Clintons were involved in Foster’s death.

 

The Washington Post was not pleased, saying that "Trump is reviving some of the ugliest political chapters of the 1990s with escalating personal attacks on Bill Clinton’s character, part of a concerted effort to smother Hillary Clinton’s campaign message with the weight of decades of controversy."

The WaPo does correctly note that in many ways the race already appears to be "teed up as a referendum on the two candidates’ pasts - both of whom carry enough baggage to fill many books - rather than their visions for the country’s future."

"Clinton has increasingly directed fire at Trump’s long history of derogatory statements about women, his bankruptcies and other controversies to argue he is unfit for office."

 

Trump, meanwhile, has sought to brand the former secretary of state as “Crooked Hillary,” pointing to such issues as the Whitewater real estate controversy in the 1990s and foreign donations to her family’s philanthropic organization over the past decade. Trump also regularly accuses the Clintons of hypocrisy on women’s issues and argues that Hillary Clinton has been an “enabler” of her husband’s actions and attempting to discredit the women in question.

That is how the topic of Vince Foster emerged: according to the WaPo, "Trump said another topic of potential concern is the suicide of former White House aide Vincent Foster, which remains the focus of intense and far-fetched conspiracy theories on the Internet."

Conspiracy theory or not, the issue of Foster's death may just hit a live nerve in the Clinton campaign, something that is the ultimate goal of Trump. 

One issue on Trump’s radar is the 1993 death of Foster, which has been ruled a suicide by law enforcement officials and a subsequent federal investigation. But some voices on the far right have long argued that the Clintons may have been involved in a conspiracy that led to Foster’s death.

 

He called theories of possible foul play “very serious” and the circumstances of Foster’s death “very fishy.”

 

"He had intimate knowledge of what was going on,” Trump said, speaking of Foster’s relationship with the Clintons at the time. "He knew everything that was going on, and then all of a sudden he committed suicide."

 

He added, "I don’t bring [Foster’s death] up because I don’t know enough to really discuss it. I will say there are people who continue to bring it up because they think it was absolutely a murder. I don’t do that because I don’t think it’s fair."

He has now, and we can only expect the topic of Clinton's alleged rape as well as the Clintons' involvement in Vince Foster' death to become an increasingly prevalent, if circuitous, theme of future Trump attack campaigns, even if as he says he "doesn't bring it up", because the purpose is simple: to throw Hillary and her campaign off balance.

Finally, since as the WaPo puts it, the presidential race is a "referendum on the candidates' past", the one candidate who comes up with the most shocking - and thus most memorable, remarkable and entertaining - skeletons in the closet will likely win. For now Trump appears to be holding the advantage, especially since nothing Hillary has come up with has managed to penetrate Teflon Trump's thick skin so far.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
DeadFred's picture

And complained about it. The one who take it in silence are just fine.

hxc's picture

"Lie, Cheat Steal" - Run the Jewels (legit libertarian hip hop)

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BEOximWoFd0

StychoKiller's picture

""Murder, treason, racketeering, drug smuggling, insider trading, bribes, perjury and corruption:  Nobody does it better!"  FIFY

tarsubil's picture

Exactly, Vince Foster's murdered corpse has completely composted by now. The very fishy smell is coming from Cuntlery. It's her whole being. Or should I say hole? Hey-yo!

CheapBastard's picture

I guess the Dems at WaPo hate when Trump brings up an "Inconvenient Truth" how fishy Vince Foster's death was.

 

Hey, "Inconvenient Truth" sounds like a good name for a movie!

RafterManFMJ's picture

Hey Trump.

Bill, after he was done biting a victim's lips and dumping a tepid load in her would tell her "Don't worry babe, I had (mumps?) when I was young and I'm sterile; no worries about getting pregnant!"

So Chelsea isn't his and is likely the bastard of Web Hubbel; note she had plastic surgery so she no longer looks like a carbon copy of her real dad.

Hillary like gash, is well known for liking gash, and went to a Universtiy known for, well, lesbianism. It's an open secret in Arkansas.

The entire couple is a manufactured freak show - like Obama, and any digging at all would uncover a festering puss fuck that would make the average citizen puke.

Google "sebaceous cyst popping" on YouTube for an idea.

TahoeBilly2012's picture

Webbbbb...Hubbbbbbble (gotta flap the lips up and down when you say it)

jeff montanye's picture

how hard would it be to get some of her hair?  not that that is really too important.

"we came, we saw, he died, cackle cackle" followed by the best rendition of gaddafi's death, now that would make a telling campaign commercial, imo.

Crawdaddy's picture

You're damn right Rafterman, it is a stagemanaged freakshow. Both Clintons were groomed from the earliest age to act as front men for the puppett masters in the shadow govt..

How is it that some ugly ass no talent political hack "lawyer", FRESH OUT OF COLLEGE, gleans national magazine facetime? Easy! Make sure all the big time magazines are controlled by fellow travellers.

http://time.com/3502935/life-with-hillary-portraits-of-a-wellesley-grad-...

Who can afford to control ALL major media? The guys who print money out of thin air, the banksters. Who owns the banksters? Ah the big question.

 

SamAdams's picture

You can learn more about the murder of Vince at What Really Happened dot com.  Strange there was no blood at the scene of the suicide.  You'd think that a bullet to the brain would bleed a little, no?

Jethro Dull's picture

Ever seen a pic of his shirt that was under his suit jacket? It was covered in blood. Suit did not look like it had much on it. Neither the ground around him. 

 

CuttingEdge's picture

WRH's Clinton body count is just plain scary.

Trump could drop one a week until November and still not run out of suspicious deaths linked to those two cunts.

<edit> Apologies to Chunga for repeating what he said below.

Infinite QE's picture

Is Trump the Roto Rooter rummaging through the sewer canal known as the Clintons?

Mr.BlingBling's picture

Yeah but I wish Trump didn't 'go nuclear' so soon.  Saving this stuff for after the convention reduces the chance for Biden to get the nod.  . 

shovelhead's picture

Muhammed Ali called it the "Rope-a-Dope".

sessinpo's picture

Bay of Pigs     The question is, why is Trump bringing this issue up at all? Hillary has plenty of factual material to smear her with and this isnt even close to the best and most recent stuff. Most Americans will totally reject this story and call Trump a crazy man and conspiracy theory lunatic.  

-------

It should be pretty obvious. He makes personal attacks. For example, he tries to make labels of his opponents that impose a character flaw. Does lyin' Ted Cruz ring a bell? How about crooked Hilliary.

The intent is to get under your opponents skin so that they make irrational emotional actions in response, mistakes. He is goading them. Haven't you ever been around people that just try to push your buttons just to get a reaction?

The other material you mentioned will still be there later.

Next it gives him more free press. The best way to win or at least appear to be is to control the topics.

Kissy Ass's picture

"The question is, why is Trump bringing this issue up at all?"

Exactly.

Trump is a jew and they, like pigs, know how to roll in the filthy muddy excrement that they live in.

chunga's picture

This is an indictment of the media too. They've been refusing to cover stories like this for a long, long time. There is enough there, there to expose an new one every single week at least until November.

The Trumpos should get in touch with a guy named Patrick Knowlton. He stopped at Fort Marcy Park to take a piss I believe, stumbled on his body and started talking. The FBI harassed the shit out him and so did Fiske if I remember right. Evans Ambrose Pritchard used to dig on it a lot.

sessinpo's picture

chunga   This is an indictment of the media too. They've been refusing to cover stories like this for a long, long time. There is enough there, there to expose an new one every single week at least until November.

------

My guess is the media will get a pass. Why? Well several reasons.

First, There are so many people that only get their news from the MSM and they are often just as politically ideological as the news is, without even realizing it. For example, many of those that watch ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, etc will swear that fox news is a right wing network of lies. And on the other side, many of those that watch fox will say that the other stations are left wing lyers.

Personally, I think fox is center and the other stations are way left. Thus there is no right wing network. But that also goes into the left wing, right wing crap. I just stopped watching them all totally. Anyway, the masses are so brainwashed, so many of them really don't think there is any thing to the clinton scandals and it really is a right wing conspiracy. Thus there was no reason for those networks to run stories on it. Those stories did run on drudge and fox. People that supported the clintons would just say it was lies and ignored it.. People that hated the clintons watched fox and looked for stories on it on the internet. You can see the same thing that happened in the last few years just on the Benghazi scandal.

Secondly, the media can just play dumb. You can't prove a negative. If I say that I did ask about the foster death and I was told whatever, how can you prove I am lying. So, you need one of there own to turn on them. That probably won't happen. They protect each other.

Trump bringing this stuff up is more likely to influence the younger generation of new voters that weren't political during the 90s.

chunga's picture

I think that's right. This is aimed at the younger generation that will be hearing about this for the first time and hopefully they'll be astonished/pissed at the complicit MSM..

Crawdaddy's picture

Hell they dont have to work that hard. Even back in the Clinton scandal days, all they had to do to respond to stories that were less than 5 years old was say "That's old news. Old conspiracy theory. I'm not going to talk about the past because I'm too busy working for the American people TODAY!"

I remember how many "man on the street" interviews suddenly popped up on radio and TV back then. Amazingly all the man on the street peeps agreed we should leave that poor hard working Mr Clinton alone and let him focus on rebuilding our economy. ABC radio's Vic Ratner was an evil hobbit. I remember him specifically.

I recall seeing some of the best disinformation money could buy. Movie "Wag the Dog" came out and wink wink nod nod, told us what the Serbian bombing was really all about. Monica testifying (I think that is what is was)? Time to emergency bomb the serbs and have everyone in media focus on that.

Later on we find out former Secratary of State Albright cussing those "damn dirty Serbs", a tiny glimpse into the wickedness that was/is the Clinton administration.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=556_1351885225&comments=1

The stage managed Dudley DoRight, Ken Starr, stood around like an amiable punching bag and let the Clintons out of the noose. He got his pay back by being made President of Baylor University. In Waco TX. Where GWB hangs his hat. Where the bikers were set up. Where the branch Davidians were burned alive.

http://thescoopblog.dallasnews.com/2016/05/report-baylor-regents-prepari...

 

Ballin D's picture

Trump is just testing the best ways to get in her head.  He essentially disqualified one of Hillary's prime picks for VP (Elizabeth Warren) with a quick tweet.  She lost her shit and ran her mouth, validating his claims and making herself look unstable all at once.

 

Full democracy (mob-ocracy) is a popularity contest and has little to do with substance.

OverTheHedge's picture

Not being a US citizen, I had every intention of being bored silly by 18 months of endless US electioneering, but I have to admit, I am entertained.

The American contingent must be very proud.

Thank you for your exceptialism

acetinker's picture

The question?  He knows his audience.

Sad, ain't it?

G-R-U-N-T's picture

For those millennials who have a desire to get educated on the Clintons...

 

-Clinton Chronicles-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHIMuUdeESA

Johnny Caine's picture

 this is smart as fuck. Look at the way Trump worded his statement. He said he doesn't know enough about it to say anything, hes telling people to Google that shit. And once you start with Foster yiu start to get into all kinds of crazy shit the Clintons were/ are involved in. Trump knows that he doesn't have the time to get into it, he knows that the editor is gonna chop up his shit or omit it. This is genius

JLee2027's picture

I'm not sure if Trump realizes what kind of soulless, psychopathic people he's dealing with in the two Clintons.  They would just assume openly assassinate him

The only method to deal with psychopathics is head on attack over and over again. They begin to fear you and retreat.  And if not them retreating, thier minions eventually will abandon them as they no longer appear invincible. Trump is doing it perfectly.

Herd Redirection Committee's picture

Sociopaths fear exposure, because they know as well as the rest of (the educated) that there is no cure for sociopathy.

The Mark of Cain, if you will.

0b1knob's picture

< Hillary has the mark of Cain.

< Hillary has the mark of the Beast.

A Pimp&#039;s love is different's picture

Hey, while we're on that subject...

 

1. If 'CAIN' & 'ABEL' were the sons of Adam & Eve

2. If ALL OF HUMANITY sprung from this lineage

 

Who were the women that Cain & Abel married & took as wives?

 

Don't mind me, I have all kinds of silly questions like that (like why a private central bank is allowed to counterfeit money)

 

I probably should be shot

flaminratzazz's picture

It seems there had to be others on the earth because when Cain was cast out of Eden, God put a mark on him so OTHER PEOPLE would not slay him. Before Eden- on the 6th day God created humans. It is all kinda murkey but humans had to have been on the earth before Eden.

knukles's picture

B I N G O
Story Already Told, But Nobody Listens
Thanks Mr Darwin.

BTW, pre-Darwin, the British Museum was chock a block full of what today would be considered Out Of Place Objects, etc.  A veritable collection of "stuff" that were at severe opposition to a large extent what has been the very narrow interpretation of Darwin's thoery(ires), out of Africa, Egyptians built the Pyramids, etc 
Just sayin'... see, Science is not always Settled, is it?
(There is no such thing as "settled" science)

acetinker's picture

Dear Mr. knukles,

I'm jus' startin' to think that this ain't our first trip around this universe.  You know, the pyramids and other shit make me feel kinda small in this iteration.

If I had all the money in the world, (which I most certainly don't) I don't think I could replicate 'em.  Considering that they probably have been to the bottom of the ocean and back a few times, I know I couldn't.

Consider that an EMP would wipe the slate clean of most of our current existence.  How long would evidence of us remain?  Not long at all, I hear you saying.

Yet, the fucking pyramids have withstood earthquakes, meteor showers, tectonic shifts, pole shifts and more unfortunate shit than I can imagine.

Who built them?

THAT was an advanced civilization!

Herd Redirection Committee's picture

Oh come on, you pour some concrete and bam THE PYRAMIDS.

shovelhead's picture

So Adam & Eve were the floor models but they had some extras back in the stockroom?

You wouldn't think that Jews would make such an obvious accounting error in the public sales prospectus.

acetinker's picture

Ya' made me laugh, shovelhead.  Thanks, I needed it!

Crawdaddy's picture

lol that is funny - but there were no jews back at that point in time.

acetinker's picture

True dat.  But they wrote the books, no?

Crawdaddy's picture

Moses wrote the first five (what the jews call the torah) but he never stepped foot in any country known as Israel. I refer to the biblical Israel, not the present day fake NWO/United Nations fabrication known as Israel. In my estimation Moses was a hebrew not a jew.

acetinker's picture

Crawdaddy!  My man!  Please don't think I think badly of you.  I don't.

When did that term "Jew" come into common usage, anyway?

Moses was a Hebrew.

Jesus was a Nazarene.

No?

Help me think.  What did they have in common?

It wasn't Jewry, in any case, was it?

Crawdaddy's picture

Hey no worries amigo! I didn't mean to imply such a thing.

When did that term "Jew" come into common usage, anyway?

Truthfully I have no conclusive proof of that answer. I've applied several years of research into topics like this and I could give you my two cents. But, out of my own doubt, I hesitate to give you what may be a misleading answer. How about we both look and let the other know what we find?

 

acetinker's picture

From what I've learned so far, the term "jew" was first used by the romans to describe anybody that wasn't a loyal roman.

Later, it was affiliated with those who deal strictly in money and favors.

It's a damn shame, actually.

It was the Khazars all along.

You know, them who claim to be Jews but are not.  They came from the western ramparts of Russia.  Anybody paying attention knows this.

They made the whole thing up from scratch.  The persecution.  The holocaust.  All of it.

Then, they got Britain to redraw the map of the middle east, (Sykes-Picot) ensuring perpetual conflict (Balfour Declaration) for the benefit of the jews who are not jews.

You probably think I'm makin' this shit up, but Jews did not naturally occur, they were created for a purpose.

None of that makes me your amigo, though.

acetinker's picture

Oedipus wasn't the first motherfucker?

JLee2027's picture

Who were the women that Cain & Abel married & took as wives?

Come on man. This is basic.

Genesis 5:4

After Seth was born, Adam lived 800 years and had other sons and daughters.

Withdrawn Sanction's picture

They are one and the same.  Cain was the first murderer and the offspring of the father of lies. 

acetinker's picture

This is the part that should hurt your head- If what you say is true, we are ALL the spawn of the Father of Lies, who, in turn is the spawn of the Creator.

You ever wonder why that is?

Not a challenge, just an honest question that Christianity has failed to answer.

Crawdaddy's picture

Takes a longer answer than a post but this vid is a decent place to start. It is really long but to answer a question like this will take time. This also relates to a question up top about the mark of Cain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OdGXCYVtag

This is from a SDA professor of biology (turned pastor) who is really good at discussing religious topics as a pragmatic methodology. Back in 2009, someone here on ZH shared a link to some of his stuff. I found this dude on ZH and I gladly say I am forever grateful.