How Russia Is Preparing For WWIII

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by The Saker,

I have recently posted a piece in which I tried to debunk a few popular myths about modern warfare. Judging by many comments which I received in response to this post, I have to say that the myths in question are still alive and well and that I clearly failed to convince many readers. What I propose to do today, is to look at what Russia is really doing in response to the growing threat from the West. But first, I have to set the context or, more accurately, re-set the context in which Russia is operating. Let’s begin by looking at the AngloZionist policies towards Russia.

The West’s actions:

First on this list is, obviously, the conquest by NATO of all of Eastern Europe. I speak of conquest because that is exactly what it is, but a conquest achieved according to the rules of 21st century warfare which I define as “80% informational, 15% economic and 5% military”. Yes, I know, the good folks of Eastern Europe were just dreaming of being subjugated by the US/NATO/EU/etc – but so what? Anyone who has read Sun Tzu will immediately recognize that this deep desire to be ‘incorporated’ into the AngloZionist “Borg” is nothing else but the result of a crushed self-identity, a deep-seated inferiority complex and, thus, a surrender which did not even have to be induced by military means. At the end of the day, it makes no difference what the locals thought they were achieving – they are now subjects of the Empire and their countries more or less irrelevant colonies in the fringe of the AngloZionist Empire. As always, the local comprador elite is now bubbling with pride at being, or so they think, accepted as equals by their new masters (think Poroshenko, Tusk or Grybauskaite) which gives them the courage to bark at Moscow from behind the NATO fence. Good for them.

Second is the now total colonization of Western Europe into the Empire. While NATO moved to the East, the US also took much deeper control of Western Europe which is now administered for the Empire by what the former Mayor of London once called the “great supine protoplasmic invertebrate jellies” – faceless bureaucrats à la François Hollande or Angela Merkel.

Third, the Empire has given its total support to semi-demonic creatures ranging from al-Khattab to Nadezhda Savchenko. The West’s policy is crystal clear and simple to the extreme: if it is anti-Russian we back it. This policy is best exemplified with a Putin and Russia demonization campaign which is, in my opinion, far worse and much more hysterical than anything during the Cold War.

Fourth, the West has made a number of highly disturbing military moves including the deployment of the first elements of an anti-missile system in Eastern Europe, the dispatching of various forms of rapid reaction forces, the deployment of a few armored units, etc. NATO now has forward deployed command posts which can be used to support the engagement of a rapid reaction force.

What does all this add up to?

Right now, nothing much, really. Yes, the NATO move right up to the Russian borders is highly provocative, but primarily in political terms. In purely military terms, not only is this a very bad idea (see cliché #6 here), but the size of the actual forces deployed is, in reality, tiny: the ABM system currently deployed can, at best, hope to intercept a few missiles (10-20 depending on your assumptions) as for the conventional forces they are of the battalion size (more or less 600 soldiers plus support). So right now there is categorically no real military threat to Russia.

So why are the Russians so clearly upset?

Because the current US/NATO moves might well be just the first steps of a much larger effort which, given enough time, might begin presenting a very real danger for Russia.

Furthermore, the kind of rhetoric coming out of the West now is not only militaristic and russophobic, it is often outright messianic. The last time around the West had a flare up of its 1000 year old chronic “messianic syndrome” condition Russia lost 20 (to 30) million people. So the Russians can be forgiven if they are paying a great deal of attention to what the AngloZionist propaganda actually says about them.

The Russians are most dismayed at the re-colonization of western Europe. Long gone are the days when people like Charles de Gaulle, Helmut Schmidt or François Mitterrand, were in charge of Europe’s future. For all their very real faults, these men were at least real patriots and not just US colonial administrators. The ‘loss’ of Western Europe is far more concerning for the Russians than the fact that ex-Soviet colonies in Eastern Europe are now under US colonial administration. Why?

Look at this from the Russian point of view.

The Russians all see that the US power is on the decline and that the dollar will, sooner or later, gradually or suddenly, lose its role as the main reserve and exchange currency on the planet (this process has already begun). Simply put – unless the US finds a way to dramatically change the current international dynamic the AngloZionist Empire will collapse. The Russians believe that what the Americans are doing is, at best, to use tensions with Russia to revive a dormant Cold War v2 and, at worst, to actually start a real shooting war in Europe.

So a declining Empire with a vital need for a major crisis, a spineless Western Europe unable to stand up for its own interest, a subservient Eastern Europe just begging to turn into a massive battlefield between East and West, and a messianic, rabidly russophobic rhetoric as the background for an increase in military deployments on the Russian border. Is anybody really surprised that the Russians are taking all this very, very serious even if right now the military threat is basically non-existent?

The Russian reaction

So let us now examine the Russian reaction to Empire’s stance.

First, the Russians want to make darn sure that the Americans do not give in to the illusion that a full-scale war in Europe would be like WWII which saw the US homeland only suffer a few, tiny, almost symbolic, attacks by the enemy. Since a full scale war in Europe would threaten the very existence of the Russian state and nation, the Russians are now taking measures to make darn sure that, should that happen, the US would pay an immense price for such an attack.

Second, the Russians are now evidently assuming that a conventional threat from the West might materialize in the foreseeable future. They are therefore taking the measures needed to counter that conventional threat.

Third, since the USA appears to be dead set into deploying an anti-ballistic missile system not only in Europe, but also in the Far East, the Russians are taking the measures to both defeat and bypass this system.

The Russian effort is a vast and a complex one, and it covers almost every aspect of Russian force planing, but there are four examples which, I think, best illustrate the Russian determination not to allow a 22 June 1941 to happen again:

  • The re-creation of the First Guards Tank Army (in progress)
  • The deployment of the Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system (done)
  • The deployment of the Sarmat ICBM (in progress)
  • The deployment of the Status-6 strategic torpedo (in progress)

The re-creation of the First Guards Tank Army

It is hard to believe, but the fact is that between 1991 and 2016 Russia did not have a single large formation (division size and bigger) in its Western Military District. A few brigades, regiments and battalions which nominally were called an “Army”. To put it simply – Russia clearly did not believe that there was a conventional military threat from the West and therefore she did not even bother deploying any kind of meaningful military force to defend from such a non-existing threat. By the way, that fact should also tell you everything you need to know about Russian plans to invade the Ukraine, Poland or the Baltics: this is utter nonsense. This has now dramatically changed.

Russia has officially announced that the First Guards Tank Army (a formation with a prestigious and very symbolic history). This Guards Tank Army will now include the 4th “Kantemirov” Guards Tank Division, the 2nd “Taman” Guards Motorized Rifle Division, the 6th Tank Brigade, the 27th Guards Motor Rifle Brigade Sevastopol and many support units. This Army’s HQ will be located in the Odinstovo suburb of Moscow. Currently the Army is equipped with T-72B3 and T-80 main battle tanks, but they will be replaced by the brand new and revolutionary T-14 Armata tank while the current infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers will be replaced by the new APC and IFV. In the air, these armored units will be protected and supported by Mi-28 and Ka-52 attack helicopters. Make no mistake, this will be a very large force, exactly the kind of force needed so smash through an attacking enemy forces (by the way, the 1TGA was present at the Kursk battle). I am pretty sure that by the time the 1TGA is fully organized it will become the most powerful armored formation anywhere between the Atlantic and the Urals (especially in qualitative terms). If the current tensions continue or even worsen, the Russians could even augment the 1TGA to a type of 21st century “Shock Army” with increased mobility and specializing in breaking deep into the enemy’s defenses.

The deployment of the Iskander-M operational-tactical missile system

The new Iskander-M operational tactical missile system is a formidable weapon by any standard. While technically it is a short-range tactical missile (under 1000km range, the Iskander-M has an official range of 500km), it can also fire the R-500 missile has the capability of striking at an intermediate/operational range (over 1000km, the R-500 has a range of 2000km). It is extremely accurate, it has advanced anti-ABM capabilities, it flies at hypersonic speeds and is practically undetectable on the ground (see here for more details). This will be the missile tasked with destroying all the units and equipment the US and NATO have forward-deployed in Eastern Europe and, if needed, clear the way for the 1TGA.

The deployment of the Sarmat ICBM

Neither the 1TGA nor the Iskander-M missile will threaten the US homeland in any way. Russia thus needed some kind of weapon which would truly strike fear into the Pentagon and White House in the way the famous RS-36 Voevoda (aka SS-18 “Satan” in US classification) did during the Cold War. The SS-18, the most powerful ICBM ever developed, was scary enough. The RS-28 “Sarmat” (SS-X-30 by NATO classification) brings the terror to a totally new level.

The Sarmat is nothing short of amazing. It will be capable of carrying 10-15 MIRVed warheads which will be delivered in a so-called “depressed” (suborbital) trajectory and which will remain maneuverable at hypersonic speeds. The missile will not have to use the typical trajectory over the North Pole but will be capable of reaching any target anywhere on the planet from any trajectory. All these elements combined will make the Sarmat itself and its warheads completely impossible to intercept.

The Sarmat will also be capable of delivering conventional Iu-71 hypersonic warheads capable of a “kinetic strike” which could be used to strike a fortified enemy target in a non-nuclear conflict. This will be made possible by the amazing accuracy of the Sarmat’s warheads which, courtesy of a recent Russian leak, we now know have a CEP of 10 meters (see screen capture)


The Sarmat’s silos will be protected by a unique “active protection measures” which will include 100 guns capable of firing a “metallic cloud” of forty thousand 30mm “bullets” to an altitude of up to 6km. The Russians are also planning to protect the Sarmat with their new S-500 air defense systems. Finally, the Sarmat’s preparation to start time will be under 60 seconds thanks a a highly automated launch system. What this all means is that the Sarmat missile will be invulnerable in its silo, during it’s flight and on re-entry in the lower parts of the atmosphere.

It is interesting to note that while the USA has made a great deal of noise around its planned Prompt Global Strike system, the Russians have already begun deploying their own version of this concept.

The deployment of the Status-6 strategic torpedo

Do you remember the carefully staged “leak” in November of last year when the Russians ‘inadvertently’ showed a super dooper secret strategic torpedo on prime time news? Here is this (in)famous slide:


What is shown here is an “autonomous underwater vehicle” which has advanced navigational capabilities but which can also be remote controlled and steered from a specialized command module. This vehicle can dive as deep as 1000m, at a speed up to 185km/h and it has a range of up to 10’000km. It is delivered by specially configured submarines.

The Status-6 system can be used to target aircraft carrier battle groups, US navy bases (especially SSBN bases) and, in its most frighting configuration, it can be used to deliver high-radioactivity cobalt bombs capable of laying waste to huge expanses of land. The Status-6 delivery system would be a new version of the T-15 torpedo which would be 24m long, 1,5m wide weigh 40 tons and capable of delivering a 100 megaton warhead which would make it twice as powerful as the most powerful nuclear device ever detonated, the Soviet Czar-bomb (57 megatons). Hiroshima was only 15 kilotons.

Keep in mind that most of the USA’s cities and industrial centers are all along the coastline which makes them extremely vulnerable to torpedo based attacks (be it Sakharov’s proposed “Tsunami bomb” or the Status-6 system). And, just as in the case of the Iskander-M or the Sarmat ICBM, the depth and speed of the Status-6 torpedo would make it basically invulnerable to incerception.

*  *  *


There is really nothing new in all of the above, and US military commanders have always known that. All the US anti-ballistic missile systems have always been primarily a financial scam, from Reagan’s “Star Wars” to Obama’s “anti-Iranian ABM”. For one thing, any ABM system is susceptible to ‘local saturation': if you have X number ABM missile protecting a Y long space against an X number of missiles, all that you need to do is to saturate only one sector of the Y space with *a lot* of real and fake missiles by firing them all together through one small sector of the Y space the ABM missile system is protecting. And there are plenty of other measures the Russians could take. They could put just one single SLBM capable submarine in Lake Baikal making it basically invulnerable. There is already some discussion of that idea in Russia. Another very good option would be to re-activate the Soviet BzhRK rail-mobile ICBM. Good luck finding them in the immense Russian train network. In fact, the Russians have plenty of cheap and effective measure. Want me to list one more?


Take the Kalibr cruise-missile recently seen in the war in Syria. Did you know that it can be shot from a typical commerical container, like the ones you will find on trucks, trains or ships? Check out this excellent video which explains this:

Just remember that the Kalibr has a range of anywhere between 50km to 4000km and that it can carry a nuclear warhead. How hard would it be for Russia to deploy these cruise missiles right off the US coast in regular container ships? Or just keep a few containers in Cuba or Venezuela? This is a system which is so undetectable that the Russians could deploy it off the coast of Australia to hit the NSA station in Alice Springs if they wanted, an nobody would even see it coming.

The reality is that the notion that the US could trigger a war against Russia (or China for that matter) and not suffer the consequences on the US mainland is absolutely ridiculous. And yet, when I hear all the crazy talk by western politicians and generals I get the impression that they are forgetting about this undeniable fact. Frankly, even the current threats against Russia have a ‘half-backed’ feel to them: a battalion here, another one there, a few missiles here, a few more there. It is like the rulers of the Empire don’t realize that it is a very, very bad idea to constantly poke a bear when all you are carrying with you is a pocket-knife. Sometimes the reaction of western politicians remind me of the thugs who try to rob a gas station with a plastic or empty gun and who are absolutely stunned with they get gunned down by the owner or the cops. This kind of thuggery is nothing more than a form of “suicide by cop” which never ends well for the one trying to get away with it.

So sometimes things have to be said directly and unambiguously: western politicians better not believe in their own imperial hubris. So far, all their threats have achieved is that the Russians have responded with a many but futile verbal protests and a full-scale program to prepare Russia for WWIII.

As I have written many times, Russians are very afraid of war and they will go out of their way to avoid it. But they are also ready for war. This is a uniquely Russian cultural feature which the West has misread an innumerable number of time over the past 1000 years or so. Over and over again have the Europeans attacked Russia only to find themselves into a fight they would never have imagined, even in their worst nightmares. This is why the Russians like to say that “Russia never starts wars, she only ends them”.

There is a profound cultural chasm between how the West views warfare and how the Russians do. In the West, warfare is, really, “the continuation of politics by other means”. For Russians, it is a ruthless struggle for survival. Just look at generals in the West: they are polished and well mannered managers much more similar to corporate executives than with, say, Mafia bosses. Take a look at Russian generals (for example, watch the Victory Day parade in Moscow). In comparison to their western colleagues they look almost brutish, because first and foremost they are ruthless and calculating killers. I don’t mean that in a negative way – they often are individually very honorable and even kind men, and like every good commander, they care for their men and love their country. But the business they are in in not the continuation of politics by other means, the business they are in is survival. At all cost.

You cannot judge a military or, for that matter, a nation, by how it behaves when it triumphs, when it is on the offensive pursing a defeated enemy. All armies look good when they are winning. You can really judge of the nature of a military, or a nation, at its darkest hour, when things are horrible and the situation worse than catastrophic. That was the case in 1995 when the Eltsin regime ordered a totally unprepared, demoralized, poorly trained, poorly fed, poorly equipped and completely disorganized Russian military (well, a few hastily assembled units) to take Grozny from the Chechens. It was hell on earth. Here is some footage of General Lev Rokhlin in a hastily organized command post in a basement inside Grozy. He is as exhausted, dirty and exposed as any of his soldiers. Just look at his face and look at the faces of the men around him. This is what the Russian army looks like when it is in the depth of hell, betrayed by the traitors sitting in the Kremlin and abandoned by most if the Russian people (who, I am sorry to remind here, mostly were only were dreaming of McDonalds and Michael Jackson in 1995).

Can you imagine, say, General Wesley Clark or David Petraeus fighting like these men did?

Check out this video of General Shamanov reading the riot act to a local Chechen politician (no translation need):

Shamanov nowadays is the Commander in Chief of the Airborne Forces (see photo) whose size Putin quietly doubled to 72’000, something I mentioned in the past as highly relevant, especially in comparison with the rather tepid force level increases announced by NATO (see “EU suidice by reality denial”). To get a feel for what modern Russian airborne forces are like, check out this article.


It is not my intention here to glorify nuclear war or the Russian Armed Forces. The reason for this, and many other, articles is to try to raise the alarm about what I see is happening nowadays. Western leaders are drunk on their own imperial hubris, nations which in the past were considered as minor stains on a map now feel emboldened to constantly provoke a nuclear superpower, Americans are being lied to and promised that some magical high tech will protect them from war while the Russians are seriously gearing up for WWIII because they have come to the conclusion that the only way to prevent that war is to make absolutely and unequivocally clear to the AngloZionists that they will never survive a war with Russia, even if every single Russian is killed.

I remember the Cold War well. I was part of it. And I remember that the vast majority of us, on both sides, realized that a war between Russia and the West must be avoided at all costs. Now I am horrified when I read articles by senior officials seriously discussing such a possibility.

Just read this article, please: What would a war between the EU and Russia look like? Here is what this guy writes:

To the poetically inclined, the Russian military looks more like a gigantic pirate crew, than a regular army. The ones who rule are the ones with the sharpest cutlass and biggest mouth, typically some scurvy infested mateis who rely on the support of their mates to make any unpopular “officer” walk the plank… Or, more apt, they resemble the members of the cossack horde, run by the brashier warriors… While these troops can be very brave, at times, they are not effective in the field against a well regulated and trained modern military machine. Given this, it is improbably, ney, impossible for ordinary Russian troops to conduct operations of major consequence at more than platoon level against any disciplined armies, especially the US, British, German, or French.

The dream of the West

“For our zoo” (old Western dream)

This kind of writing really scares me. Not because of the imbecilic and racist stupidity of it, but because it largely goes unchallenged in the mainstream media. Not only that, there are plenty such articles written elsewhere (see here, here or here). Of course, the authors of that kind of “analyses” make their money precisely the kind of manic cheer-leading for the western forces, but that is exactly the mindset which got Napoleon and Hitler in trouble and which ended with Russian forces stationed in Paris and Berlin. Compare that kind of jingoistic and, frankly, irresponsible nonsense with what a real military commander, Montgomery, had to say on this topic:

The next war on land will be very different from the last one, in that we shall have to fight it in a different way. In reaching a decision on that matter, we must first be clear about certain rules of war. Rule 1, on page I of the book of war, is: “Do not march on Moscow”. Various people have tried it, Napoleon and Hitler, and it is no good. That is the first rule.

So who do you trust? Professional cheerleaders or professional soldiers? Do you really believe that Obama (or Hillary), Merkel and Hollande will do better than Napoleon or Hitler?

If the AngloZionist ‘deep state’ is really delusional enough to trigger a war with Russia, in Europe or elsewhere, the narcissistic and hedonistic West, drunk on its own propaganda and hubris, will discover a level of violence and warfare it cannot even imagine and if that only affected those responsible for these reckless and suicidal policies it would be great. But the problem is, of course, that many millions of us, simple, regular people, will suffer and die as a consequence of our collective failure to prevent that outcome. I hope and pray that my repeated warnings will at least contribute to what I hope is a growing realization that this folly has to be immediately stopped and that sanity must return to politics.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
skinwalker's picture

I'll give it a shot at surviving WW3, but if aliens ever invade, I'm grabbing that bottle of scotch I hid from the wife, popping in some cartoons, and calling it a day. 

hedgeless_horseman's picture



Open the Scotch, now, and enjoy it while reading this fantastic book, Stalingrad: The Fateful Siege, 1942-1943, by Antony Beevor.

knukles's picture

The stuff worthy of Nobel Peace Prizes, this comins about of late. 

LykeMe's picture
LykeMe (not verified) knukles May 28, 2016 9:31 PM

The truth about the conflict with Russia NO ONE in any media will tell you.

peddling-fiction's picture

Yeah, the Khazars are hell bent on revenge.

NidStyles's picture

Ten meters is pretty damn good. Perhaps the Bear has decided to set it's sights on the ZOGs after they had raped her during her capitivity?

peddling-fiction's picture

66 million Russian souls were murdered. Especially the Christian faith in Russia.

And the demons want more...<rolling eyes>

Ignatius's picture

Negotiation is cheaper and easier, but then that's really not the point.

God help us.

Stuck on Zero's picture

The West is preparing by bringing in millions of young radical moslem males to draft.

strannick's picture

Western full spectrum neocon hegemony is evil Stanic in scope

AVmaster's picture

Status-6 is almost complete fantasy.

Yes, a nuclear bomb detonated underwater would cause lots of radiation(we know this from our own tests).

No, nothing travels that fast underwater.

No, tsar bomba 2.0(full version) would most likely be delivered by other means as the bomb still can't miniaturized(and never will be), making it impractical to deliver via sub-drone.


A more plausible scenario is many "mini-status-6" torpedos being fired offshore from Bear planes or some other aircraft....

Latina Lover's picture

2-3 Nukes aimed at Cumbre Viejo in the canary islands could also do the job.

Realistically, invading Russia would be like invading the US, where nearly everyone is armed, and knows how to use their weapons. It would be suicide, as Napoleon and Hitler found out. The real plan is a color revolution in Moscow. This continues to fail, however, as every russian traitor is revealed to all and then undermined and/or taken out.


God's picture

The AngloZionist Empire will fall if they attempt to battle Russia. Trump will have his ass handed to him by the tactical genius Mr. Putin.

God has spoken!

A Pimp&#039;s love is different's picture

Supergun (no personal comment because I'm more 'smart ass' than 'smart', but editorials or comments by others welcome)

God's picture

25 megawatts? Just plain stupid. Sitting ducks with enormous signatures.

God has spoken.

A Pimp&#039;s love is different's picture

That's what Solyndra is for. Oh Wait!

Latina Lover's picture


Trump has no intention of invading Russia,  or furthering any of the other neocon/neoliberal/bolshevik wars.  Check out  Trumps comments on Kristol:

McCormick No. 9's picture

Sometimes I wonder if the whole NATO buildup is hoping to bankrupt Russia in an arms race like the West bankrupted the Soviet Union with StarWars. But now, it is a toss-up- maybe the West will bankrupt itself first.

J S Bach's picture

And while the fireworks are occurring, the culprits will be safely unsconced in Patagonia where they have vast holdings - far away from any fallout or threats.

eforce's picture

"We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war."

-The Protocols

If WW3 happens, it will make it easier to identify the real rulers of this planet once and for all, but might be a bit too late...

Chris Dakota's picture
Chris Dakota (not verified) eforce May 29, 2016 8:07 AM

Gilad Atzmon who was born a Zionist Jew in Israel and rejected it all said "Jews love their holocausts, they have one every 70 years. Their favorite time is in the middle where they can build holocaust monuments and museums."

It's coming again, they just can't stop themselves...

johngaltfla's picture

I've been trying to warn for over a year that Russia is thinking at least 5 years ahead of the American 1990's groupthink, yet there are few American politicians much less Europeans who will have the worst part of the war fought on their territory, even considering the consequences of such a conflict. While Russia might take a bloody nose, American military bases and cities for the first time since World War II will be the new front lines for a new conflict. That is why those writers who claim Russia is full of hot air should re-think their philosophy of what the next conflict will look like. It will be a multi-lateral, multi-national conflict fought inside America's banks, infrastructure, and at bases all throughout our nation.

We are not ready for such a conflict and the moral will to fight it does not exist.

From June 2015:

How America Loses World War III to Russia
TuPhat's picture

It uses too much power and fires too slow to even defend itself from attack.

WOWurstupid's picture

What God? The god you all are preaching is not the God of the Bible. The Scythians were Rus not Khazar. The God of the Bible is in control. This country is in judgement and Zion or Zionists don't have a thing to do with it. Kill 80 million of your own and God reacts as we will soon see.

HowdyDoody's picture

"Status-6 is almost complete fantasy. ... No, nothing travels that fast underwater."

You are obviously unaware of Russian supercavitating torpedos. They can reach speeds of 370 km/h.


Kirk2NCC1701's picture

Perhaps. OTOH, if you believe everything that you want to believe, then...

I'll get beamed up any day now, when f*cking Scott fixes the Warp engines and Transporter.

When that happens, I'll sort out the BS on Earth, and be your benevolent Magical Guy in the Sky.

But you have to really Believe, little sheeple.


Look, it's reassuring and comforting to Believe, but it's better to Know.

"Welcome to Kirk's ZeroFluff Zone"

Mr. Ed's picture

No, it's science fact (google it)... exploiting supercavitation is an old idea.  Current performance limits for the technology are actually around 400 Km/hr.  It has other uses, eg: elimination of cavitation pitting in underwater turbine devices.

OTOH: getting beamed back up may take a while Cap'n.

jeff montanye's picture

that should work well.  

who is the enemy?

nmewn's picture

Apparently anyone not a politician or a general in the Kremlin or the Pentagon.

COSMOS's picture

Lots of good stuff here.  I have used Kick ass torrents for years and no problems.  Look at comments, make sure the person if a verified uploader and scan anything you download.  If google or firefox try to block you from the side, ignore them.

To download you need a torrent client like

After you install the program and select a directory to download to then you are ready to go, on the kick ass site click on the upsided down U or aka horseshoe symbol to start the download.

I would recommend you sign up for a VPN service like BTGuard for your privacy.

Sanctuary2's picture

>>>66 million Russian souls were murdered. Especially the Christian faith in Russia.


by the Bolshevik Jews-and todays NeoConservativea are Bolshevik Jews


God's picture

Jews are mass murders but they claim to be meek and persecuted by the world. They say: "yes there are bad Jews but we are not bad Jews. The bad ones attend another synagogue on the other side of town, we're not sure where it is, Rabbi Steinlych or something like that.".

Don't be fooled anymore Goyum. GOD knows they are ALL BAD JEWS.

God has spoken!

Kirk2NCC1701's picture

They use their "faith" as a Flag-of-Convenience" and a "Weapon of Mass Deception", in their Borg-like march toward world rule (via leveraged control in the halls of Power, Influence and Wealth).

When will you dumb-ass hicks learn that their imaginary Guy in the Sky wants them to conquer and rule, whereas your imaginary Guy in the Sky, is a lazy hippie pacifist, who wants you to take it and be happy about it. Ditch that hippie-bitch, or remain sheeple forever.

BTW, you must write your own version of "The Protocols", or use the existing ones against all Outsiders. But that's not gonna happen, because too many Whites have become slavish, scared, lazy and disloyal sheeple, interested only in their individual welfare.

Until you reprogram your brains to think like Zionists ("What's in it for me, and what's in it for my People?"), you will remain a deservedly conquered people.

"Welcome to Kirk'sZeroFluff Zone"

Victor von Doom's picture

+1000 Right on the ball Kirk. Couldn't say it better myself.

The enemy is a cultural total enemy folks. Don't believe the lies. No peace with these scum...not if the war lasts a thousand years. Death to the last of them.

Volkodav's picture

Not the truth....

Anyone can look even simple WIKI to see Khazars nothing to do with Scythians.

Old Encyclopedia Britannica, Historians better sources. Gawler is one.

Search: Khazars, Red Khazars, Red Terror, Red Mafiya

Gen 10 2-5 From Japeth  thus are Turk foundation

Scythian fair features as Scythian burials is best witness that nothing is same. All are Euro type.

Scythian descend from Shem (Sem) appeared from Land of Medes, spoke what is

commonly known as Indo-European.




Kirk2NCC1701's picture

One of the first "pillar of salt" casualties in WW3 will be the ZioCons' HQ in the ME.

If they think that they will escape Scott-free, while the Goyim duke it out for theirbenefit (once again), they will be sorely mistaken. NOTHING will be left but molten sea of radioactive glass, and no place to hide or hijack on the planet.

Ergo... they'd better choose Peace, or they will get eternal Oblivion.

Kirk2NCC1701's picture

One of the first "pillar of salt" casualties in WW3 will be the ZioCons' HQ in the ME.

If they think that they will escape Scott-free, while the Goyim duke it out for theirbenefit (once again), they will be sorely mistaken. NOTHING will be left but molten sea of radioactive glass, and no place to hide or hijack on the planet.

Ergo... they'd better choose Peace, or they will get eternal Oblivion.

Volkodav's picture

"It was an unpleasant suprise - at Borodino we fought with Siberians for the first time. These were strapping men - superior well armed soldiers, they were dressed in wide fur coats and hats and wore fur boots on their feet."  -Otto Skorzeny- 

HRH of Aquitaine's picture
HRH of Aquitaine (not verified) hedgeless_horseman May 28, 2016 9:36 PM

HH, cheers and well met!

ebworthen's picture

I am certain there are more "real people" in Russia than the cotton candy trollops of the West.

We've emasculated our men, butchified our Women, and pursued a path of delusion nature does not recognize.

Whalley World's picture

Stalingrad was a great and terrifying read. Not as terrifying as for the Germans in his follow up Berlin

junction's picture

The bellicose talk from cokehead Obama's neocon LGBT roommates does not change the fact that the United States has squandered hundreds of billions of dollars on defective weaponry made by Wall Street (read New World Order) controlled defense contractors like BAE and Lockheed.  Almost all the USA military ordnance is overpriced high maintenance junk, good for slaughtering American malcontents but pretty much useless against Russian Main Battle Tanks with reactive armor, super-duper composite armor and automated turret guns, plus signal jamming equipment.  I am just waiting for Russia to announce that it has a new type low gamma radiation, low radioactive fallout neutron bomb. The United States is now run by a close knit group of Nazis, a group Scalia found out he was not a part of as he lay dying on his crummy bunk bed, surrounded by the Cibola Creek Ranch satanists who watched him as he gasped for breath and died, the cannula of his portable oxygen concentrator out of his reach.

NidStyles's picture

There are no fucking NAZI's running anything. The Jews would love everyone to believe that bullshit, but there are no Germans in any position of real power anywhere. You can not truly be National Socialist unless you're German.


National Socialism comes from the German Jager culture, it a by-product of German culture itself. The celebration of conquest and the holding up of science and natural law. The National Socialists lost WW2. The Communists and Jew have been running the world since then. FFS all of the current intel agencies were started by communists, as were the largest financial institutions.

junction's picture
Generic definition of nazi: 3. (often l.c.) Sometimes Offensive. a person who is fanatically dedicated to or seeks to control a specified activity, practice, etc.: a jazz nazi who disdains other forms of music; a body Nazi who works out four hours a day.


jay35's picture

He capitalized the word, therefore he's not using the generic or colloquial definition.

Déjà view's picture

National Socialism sprouted from Mussolini/Italian Facism of early 1920's,  NOT Jäger culture.

ThirdWorldDude's picture

That doesn't tell you shit about how fascism and nazism have evolved since the 1920s.

If you agree that the broad definition of national socialism is "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized (autocratic) government headed by a strong authoritarian (dictatorial) leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition", then consider this:


Jewish fascism (aka Zionism)
     Another clear, albeit bizarre, example is Israel, which would no doubt quickly implode without the requisite unifying principle of an external enemy with which the nation must always be at war, or preparing for war. I refer to it as Jewish fascism because it predates the Zionist project. When I was in Hebrew school in the early 50's, in preparation for my bar mitzvah, I thought I should read the Old Testament. What struck me was that much of it conformed to what we were being taught was the essence of fascism, though I didn't make much of it at the time. Although I haven't read it, it appears that the Talmud, the primary scripture of the Orthodox ashkenazim, is a veritable manual of Jewish fascism. (4)   Israel is exceptional in a number of ways:
1. It is the only nation that has ever been deliberately created with the express purpose of occupying foreign territory through the ethnic cleansing of its inhabitants. 2. It is the only nation that required the invention of a "people" to carry out such a settler/colonialist project (1). 3. It is the only nation to have invented a religion (the Holycause) to complement its secular political ideology (Zionism). 4. It is the only nation that is wholly parasitical, dependent on extorting the economic means to survive from other societies that it (or its agents in other countries) has effectively subverted.
  Thus, Israel combines three convergent forms of fascism: ethnocentric (based on mytho-history much like the Nazi notion of an Aryan race); religious (nominally Jewish, although its founders were secular. Following the 1940's the place of Judaism as the sustaining religious identity was essentially replaced by the Holycause, complete with a Holy Inquisition.); and, of course, virulentlynationalistic. Fortuitously for the Jewish fascists, or maybe not so coincidentally (3), an extremely powerful ally emerged from within the American religious world, the Christian Zionists. Although essentially a doomsday cult, it numbers, conservatively, 40-50 million Americans eager for Israel to build the Second Temple, thereby paving the way to Armageddon, at which point these lunatics expect be "raptured up" to heaven. American and Jewish fascism appear to have converged into an aggressive pathological force that, considering their nuclear arsenal, endangers humanity more than any such phenomenon in the past. Both Americans and Jews have made extraordinary positive contributions to world civilization, but a ruthless and predatory American imperialism and fascistic Zionism we can do without.