Sweden's Migrant Rape Epidemic Explained

Clearly the Swedes themselves are to blame.

It is they who produced so many fine looking women. Muslim males simply cannot control themselves. The Muslim males have been victimized by the Swedish devils.

...or, execute rapists.

So what happens to all the nuts? In Idaho they occasionally have a feed serving rocky mountain oysters (cow testicles). Maybe they could be breaded and deep fried and served as Muhammad McNuggets?

A modest proposal.

Lobotomies for any migrant who rapes (or kidnaps or commits any other serious crime against persons). This would be simple to do, give the technique of the famous Dr. Lobotomy of the 1950's who used the technique to "passify" children. 

/sarc

Seriously, the thing to do is crack down and enforce the existing laws as well as to put a moratorium on immigration, as Trump proposes for the US, even if Merkel does not obey the dictrates of the Turks and immigrants once again attempt to flood Europe. It is ridiculous to grant asylum to economic immigrants as opposed to people fleeing a war zone, if the word 'asylum' means anything. It is also absurd to pay billions to Turkey without auditing the use of funds, as any sensible person would agree.

Maybe the Saudis would be willing to finance the construction of hundreds of prisons in Europe?

I didn't know that "greater" Israel included Sweden.  It doesn't.  So I assume you are delusional.

The two sides to the argument (observations) define a conundrum. On the one hand you have a people, who at best may be considered 7th century, at least those who maintain tribal customs. They wipe their asses with a bare hand, mutilate their female offspring, and treat spouses as if dogs. They kill each other for not accepting the lineage of Muhammad who was a pedophile. Their logic, dress...culture is a polar opposite of Western values. They will never assimilate with the West and have only the desire to subdue and destroy Westerners and Western systems. They are, at least not so dumb that after years of constant bombings, strafing, murder that after a while realize that finding a daily meal or leading a daily life rummaging through rubble for subsistence is not the greatest option for survival. The solution, leave, go somewhere else!

The phenomenal opportunity that presented itself is that many of the Western countries, some who participated in the bombing, strafing and murders of their families back home made available the freeloading systems they offered their own citizens to these strangers, and accepted their migration by the tens of hundreds of thousands.

The questions that could be asked remind of that regarding the chicken and the egg. In addition throw in what kind of government leaders allow (subject) their own countrymen to these invaders? What kind of people allow crimes to be committed against themselves, their families, loved ones, and property without some effort at resistance. I think back to the "stories" regarding Jews being lined up and forced to enter gas chambers and meet their deaths. I could never understand why they didn't just choose to rush the guards and make some effort for life. In either case they may have met death, but to do so obligingly defies the imagination. In a sense, the acceptance of unarmed invaders pillaging towns, cities or families reflects the same thought process.

There should be an old fable, "He who burns neighbors house must provide his own house to neighbor". An individual may rightly say, I didn't bomb anyone, my government did! So why would that same individual accept the consequences of his governments actions passively.

The summary (simplistic) is this. Country A bombs Country B. (Why did they do that?) Country A invites country B citizens to come live in country A. (Why would they do that?) Country B citizens move to country A. (Why wouldn't they?) Country B citizens behave badly in country A. (Why would they do that?) Country A citizens do not resist abuse from country B citizens. ( Why don't they?) and finally, whose goals are achieved by disrupting social cohesion in both country A and B?

"should these muslims stay, in a generation or two they will probably fit in a lot better and will have likely stopped raping the locals."

Doubt it. Most likely they'll form a permanent underclass and become a constant drain on government resources, not to mention a threat to themselves and everyone around them, like what you already have in parts of the USA. All that's really missing at this point are the guns.