Multiple Suspects On The Loose In Orlando - Why The Media Blackout Of Eyewitness Accounts?

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Shepard Ambellas via,

According to heavily censored eyewitness reports, totally suppressed from the mainstream, there were likely several other radicalized perpetrators involved with Saturday night’s terror attack, which led deaths of 49 club-goers at Pulse and over 50 others being injured.

One eyewitness to the attack, who was inside the nightclub when it happened, was giving his testimony to the attack, after being trapped inside the club, live on-air, to a mainstream news source when he was abruptly cut off after providing a crucial detail. The eyewitness said that during the attack “there was a guy there that was trying to […] hold the door closed so that we couldn’t exit,” as pointed out by an investigative reporter on YouTube.

Additionally, there were reports that police could be seen quietly conducting an “active search” for accomplices who may have already exited the nightclub after the attack.

Another eyewitness that was inside Pulse when the attack occurred told reporters, “I’m pretty sure it was more than one person, you know, like I said, I heard two guns going at the same time.” The eyewitness said that the event lasted “like eight minutes.”

Another crucial detail that the press is leaving out is that the shooter or shooters were initiating “rapid fire;” which means that the weapons used were likely fully automatic, as depicted by the same eyewitness when he made an animated machine gun-like sound with his mouth for the press to hear.

The witness said that he could smell the gun smoke in the air and that the attackers were “working together.”

“It was not one shot at a time,” but rather from a machine gun,” another witness said, who eventually made it out of the club into the “alleyway.”

Raw footage from the scene also reveals that officers may have been engaging an additional perpetrator outside of the nightclub, backing up other reports.

It has also been reported that both FBI and police, around the country, are increasing their security protocols, dispatching undercover officers and specifically beefing up security measures at the annual Gay Pride Parade which is still currently underway in Los Angeles.

Moreover, officials also are concerned that there is a ‘gaping hole’ in the nation’s security net and that more attacks may occur.

Authorities and even the President of the United States, Barack Obama, are currently downplaying the fact that there is a definite radicalized Islamic ideological connection to the attack and again, are covering up the fact that multiple suspects are likely still on the loose.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
NoDebt's picture

"I’m pretty sure it was more than one person, you know, like I said, I heard two guns going at the same time"

Dual wield, like in Call of Duty.

tmosley's picture

This is extraordinarily difficult to do with long guns.

Cognitive Dissonance's picture

This entire affair stinks to high heaven.

DeadFred's picture

As with Paris and San Bernardino I had no interest in reading about this event. Nothing we hear in the beginning will be true. Read the investigations in a month or two and get a glimmer of truth.

MillionDollarBonus_'s picture

We can't jump to rash conclusions about all Muslims simply because of one incident! On the one hand, conservatives are preventing sensible gun legislation that could have prevented this tragedy, and then they're using the tragedy to blame all Muslims! It's an outrage!

Stackers's picture

Eye witness testimony on the videos is really thin for a 2nd shooter theory

ParkAveFlasher's picture

Isn't it always?  What MIC needs is moar excuse to scare people off Amendments 1 and 2, first by manufacturing equivalencies between bastard devil-worship of blood sacrifice to the true religion of peace which is Christianity, Christ redeeming our most murderous tendencies by his own blood, second by turning people away from their natural tendency to congregate out of fear of random massacre, and finally by establishing a monopoly of force and thus authority in law by confiscation of weaponry, be it lethal tool or financial independence or education or self-determination.  Slaves to idols, slaves to fear, and slaves to debt is what they want of us.  And this, brothers, is the beast we face now.

erkme73's picture

Now it's starting to make more sense.  I questioned how ONE person can kill 50 and injure another 50.  There is no way - especially if there was a cop already on scene when the shooting started.  I figured when the dust settles, we'll learn that the majority of the dead were shot by the SWAT team during their steroid-induced RA-RAHH heroic rescue attempt.   But, multiple assailants makes more sense.

Handful of Dust's picture

Anonymous said the other day they would be doing something about th elies and distortions coming from the main street media; have they done anything yet?

Poundsand's picture

Sorry but the sounds I have heard are typcial of a semi- not fully automatic rifle.

With regards to the guy holding the door closed.  He was on the outside in the alley and I saw him interviewed on TV.  While I think this is cowardly, whether you agree with the decision or not, if you did it, you would never, ever, ever admit to it. 

funthea's picture

I would submit to you sir, that you simply know nothing of the distinction between semi and full auto rapid fire. The sound described by the eyewittness, using his mouth to articulate the sound of the rapid fire he heard, was indicitive of full auto and not semi auto. Not sure how you derived otherwise, but I would submit you have not been around actuall full auto rapid fire as I have.

erkme73's picture

The sound articulated by the witness certainly sounded like full auto - but the sounds captured in the last video were cleary not.   That wasn't even bumpfire.   In fact, it sounded slower than what I can fire on my 5.56.  I'd bet after firing 100+ in rapid succession, the shooter's finger was getting tired and slowing.

LowerSlowerDelaware_LSD's picture
LowerSlowerDelaware_LSD (not verified) bamawatson Jun 13, 2016 3:12 PM

Where was Carlos Danger?

HowdyDoody's picture

The FBI was investigating the alleged shooter for 10 months. They introduced him to several 'informants' aka handlers.


"The significance of this cannot be understated. "Informants" in this context, according to FBI affidavits regarding similar counterterrorism investigations, refers to individuals posing as members of terrorist organizations who approach suspects, coerce them into planning and preparing for terrorist attacks, before finally aiding the FBI in the suspect's arrest before the attack is finally carried out."


Yet another box ticked in the list of FBI involvement / entrapment in these 'terror' events.

jeff montanye's picture

in fact, check me if i'm wrong, the "entrapment" cases are the only ones the fbi stopped.  (i can't help myself noting that the fbi found a 9-11 hijacker passport in the wtc ruins)  ("didn't find a toilet seat, didn't find a door knob") 

Whoa Dammit's picture

Here is the WTF video of the day. The full retard who held the door shut being interviewed on Fox by Megan Kelly says "I'm no hero."

Ms No's picture

There were two different incidents with someone holding a door.  This one was outside the other was inside telling people that they needed to stay in the building. 

Maxter's picture

I bet the MSM went full damage control after they cut the live witness saying someone was blocking the door.

He might be a crisis actor.

jeff montanye's picture

i too don't think enough attention has been paid to the crisis actor.  they are the flat out best part of the early 9-11 films; better than actually realizing that each floor, each interstice of concrete and steel, was being exploded.  well maybe not but it is at least a chance to look in the eyes of the perps.   dick cheney always looked like a dead carp.

jerry_theking_lawler's picture

yes. agreed on the speed. Also, in this close of quarters, a shotgun would've been a better primary weapon.

also, why did the shooter leave anyone alive? If he was killing folks and had 3+ hours, why was anyone left alive in the club? The SWAT should not have rescued anyone if he was the shooter and had already killed 50 people and shot 50 more? This is what makes no sense to me....

jeff montanye's picture

yes oh yes.  it was at least three hours.  three hours.  i guess the swat team had to wait for the shooter to calm down.  get tired.  talk to his employer's lawyer's lawyer.

Fullthrottle's picture

I honestly hardly believe any accounts of what happened in there. Most of the people ive seen interviewed are wackjobs to start. 

thePablo's picture

Not sure I'd trust a lot of the patrons of that club to have experience with different types of weapons. The video posted to social media is definitely not full auto. It sounds like rapid single shots from a semi-automatic weapon.

Chris Dakota's picture
Chris Dakota (not verified) Poundsand Jun 13, 2016 7:21 PM

I wrote yesterday his chart is gay, and the violence came out of that.

CNN: Wife of shooter does not know if he was gay, police said he often frequented gay nightclubs.

Vote up!

Vote down!

-2 Chris Dakota remain calm Jun 12, 2016 5:12 PM

Was gay himself.

Progressed Mars went into Pisces age 12, must have been when he started to feel it.

Progressed Mars in Pisces now conjunct Jupiter square to Saturn in Sagittarius, and Saturn with transit Mars return activates

the natal and progressed chart. Mars was the trigger.

Saturn in Sag he felt terrible guilty about the fact that  was homo himself.

Mars in Aquarius Square Scorpio Sun, and Venus is Scorpio conjunct Pluto.

Hillary Clinton's chart is similar only WAY more deadly. The reason why she doesn't want Trump to have nuclear codes,

is she wants to push the button herself!

Natal Jupiter in Pisces is often a gay signature. The whole chart screams gay, repressed with heavy religious guilt that results in violence.

Vote up!

Vote down!

0 J Jason Djfmam Chris Dakota Jun 12, 2016 5:13 PM



He was gay because of the planets, moon, and stars.

Now I have heard everything.


kiwidor's picture

chrisdakota:  we can put your theory to the test if you like, i have some birthday data from a random group if you're up to the task.

Chris Dakota's picture
Chris Dakota (not verified) kiwidor Jun 14, 2016 7:47 AM

I don't need to prove anything. I have been studying astrology for 50 yrs.

It works or I would have given up.

Not everyone with his chart will express it in this way, but they will have underlying

issues that are similar. I peg him as gay from his chart, then given what he did I will

bet my money on it.

I have never met an astrologer like myself, all of them are pushing their own agenda

or beliefs. I call it as it is, due to the chart I have which is willing to be in the .00001%

for the truth.

Someone born in 1986 in San Francisco to atheist parents won't respond to their chart

in the same way as this guy did. A gay person born in SF in the 80s would have way less

religious/sex issues, they would have a chart that flows better. So you must ask where were

they born, into what culture, are they male or female to get a better idea of how the chart works.

jeff montanye's picture

haven't done it yet but upvote.  this is creative.

Chris Dakota's picture
Chris Dakota (not verified) jeff montanye Jun 14, 2016 10:52 AM

Down voters, something, anything at all??

The ex-wife of Orlando mass killer Omar Mateen claimed Monday that she believed he was homosexual — as it was revealed that he frequented the gay nightclub where he staged the nation’s worst massacre in modern times.

Sitora Yusufiy, who was married to Mateen in 2009 for three months, made the shocking claim on Brazilian television station SBT Brazil.

Her fiancé, Marco Dias, speaking in Portuguese on her behalf, said Yusufiy believed that Mateen had “gay tendencies” and that his father had called him gay in front of her. Dias also claimed “the FBI asked her not to tell this to the American media.”

Modal TriggerSitora YusufiyPhoto: Facebook

The bombshell came as a male former classmate of Omar Mateen said he had been asked out romantically by the mass killer, who reportedly was a virtual regular at the Pulse nightclub, having visited it more than a dozen times over the years.

Backin2006's picture

Shadowmen, if you are listening, hear one thing. We hate being lied to!

J S Bach's picture

Whatever the true scenario... whether it's a lone fag-hating Muslim or a militant group of them...

why do so few people ask the question, "Why do they hate us?"

Could it be... perhaps... hmmmm... just possibly... because we've been bombing their countries for 14 years - destroying their infrastructures, maiming their relatives?

Now, why on earth don't they love us and strive to live in peace along side us?

Try to empathize just a little bit, people.  If it were YOUR country and kinsmen being treated so, would you not harbor an eternal hatred for the perpetrators?

I would - and DO - against the brainpower behind it all.

dark pools of soros's picture

You miss the subtle point.   If there really is a war like we are told are tax payer money has to keep going toward, then destroy whatever needs to be destroyed like Putin does and be done with it..  but since it is a fake war to just redraw country lines for pipelines then this shit will never end so all you can do is keep them out of here.  Either way, you don't have a reason to bring them here.

So to your point, keep them out of here and also stop destroying countries with no plan to have any peace or structure in them.


Team up with the Russians, and blast the Sunnis to hell..  only thing is that distorted Israel having its own holy wars that doesn't fit in that plan



AnonG-Man's picture

"Blast the Sunnis to hell..."  Were you thinking that one through? That is if you are not aware of the various religious groups or sects in those countries on the ground.  The Syrian Armed Forces or Syrian Arab Army, those that are fighting ISIS/ISIL and burning their flags, are made up of majority Sunni led by minority Alawite, whom are also allies of Shi'a Militias, Shi'a Iranian Armed Forces (Quds, Revolutionary Guards, Basij, etc.), Shi'a Hezbollah, Kurds (Sunni, Christian, and others), and Russia in Syria and Iraq that fight along side them. So why would one "Blast the Sunnis to hell..." the majority non-extremist people, who are fighting heroically to save their countries from invaders or extremists?


It's NATO and her Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkish allies that fund and arm extremist mercenaries - even Israel has been caught giving aid to extremist minorities, whom may be from any branch.  In a similar context "Blast the Protestants to hell..." would make little common sense, being that it contains branches of Christian faiths and views ranging from moderate to minority extremism.


The lesson learned here is those in power waging war, whether they are Imperialist Empires or Extremists, are in the minority - yet are counting on others willfull ignorance and/or manipulation with an overall objective of profit by way of misery, while the majority suffers in various ways.  Or, in classic terms:  Problem, Reaction, Solution.

PTR's picture

(Sorry to piggy back your comment this way-)  Funny how it helps play into the Divide and Conquer paragidgm...

Expat's picture

Valid question, JS.  Is it terrorism simply because we are the victims this time?  I wonder what Americans would really do if Muslims somehow managed to kill the equivalent number of women and children that the US has slaughtered, poisoned or starved to death in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan over the past twenty years?  Would they give up or bring out the nukes?  (pssst, I bet they would bring out the nukes and then ralize too late they just irradiaded 60% of the world's oil).

thesonandheir's picture

Why has this guy not been arrested for blocking peoples exit out of a murder situation?



newdoobie's picture

Irradiated oil = more MPG

checkessential's picture

True, we have been bombing them ever since they hijacked 4 planes and killed over 3000 Americans.  In your perfect world, I guess we should have asked them what we could do to make them not hate us on 9/12/2001? 

bluez's picture

{Quote} True, we have been bombing them ever since they hijacked 4 planes and killed over 3000 Americans. {Unquote} -- checkessential


It wasn't Muslims who did that. The planes were remote-controlled and the buildings were bombed by our very own Shadow Regime.

Grosvenor Pkwy's picture

They weren't planes, they were cruise missiles. Aimed directly at two major financial firms Cantor Fitz and Aon Corp.

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

no, they were planes you fuckin troll.

Socratic Dog's picture

Get educated.  That was your own fucking government. 

swmnguy's picture

You're choosing a very late starting point for all this.  Perhaps 9/11/01 was the first you realized what had been going on for centuries, if not millennia, between "The West" and "The Muslim World."  You can choose so many starting points, but to choose 9/11/01 suggests a lack of seriousness and curiosity about the world and how it works.


To address your question, perhaps we could have not kept murderous oppressive monarchies in place over them?  Not killed every politician they developed who intended to help the average citizen in those countries?  Perhaps we might have not sponsored a nation-state dedicated to making them miserable and hopeless, when not killing them outright?  Perhaps we could have encouraged our allies to not colonize those areas, in this past century?  Those are just the first couple things that come to my mind, and I've barely thought about it.


I mean, had we "asked them what we could do to make them not hate us on 9/12/2001" it would have been 2 days late and more like 100 years too late.  But they would have had quite the list for us.

J S Bach's picture

After 15 years (since 9/11)... one would think that most intelligent people have figured out that the diabolical event was not the work of arabs with box-cutters from an Afghanistan cave hideaway.  According to all logic and evidence - it was the work of Mossad and their traitorous elements in the CIA as well as dual-citizen Israeli apostates.  I pity people who so gullibly bite on the narrative of lies ever-spewing from the fevered minds of our present rulers.

Heed your avatar, checkessential... and check the essentials.

Matteo S.'s picture

They ?

Has the US army made but a single strike on Saudi Arabia ? Most of 9/11 hijackers were Saudis.

Answer is none.

Problem may be that the US Air Force should bomb the houses of the Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Kagan, Clinton and Nuland families, as well as prince Bandar Bush's.