Submitted by Claire Bernish via TheAntiMedia.org,
While Bernie Sanders’ supporters and independent media outlets have exhaustively pointed out that corporate media’s fatuous prattling over Hillary Clinton likely tipped the elections in her favor, we now have solid proof — leaked emails show the DNC colluded with mainstream outlets to heavily favor Clinton.
“Our goals in the coming months will be to frame the Republican field and the eventual nominee early and to provide a contrast between the GOP field and HRC,” reads an email dated May 26, 2015, referencing the former secretary of state by her initials, posted by “Guccifer 2.0” — after the Romanian hacker who allegedly accessed Clinton’s private email server multiple times.
One of the strategies listed for “positioning and public messaging” states, “Use specific hits to muddy the waters around ethics, transparency and campaign finance attacks on HRC.”
DNC was pushing HRC as candidate from May, 2015 of last year. #Guccifer2 pic.twitter.com/0rJcTspOvl
— Kick (@MatthewKick) June 16, 2016
As the mainstream largely directed attention to the hack of the Democratic National Committee’s strategy to oppose Donald Trump, this collusion to steer the narrative in Hillary’s favor appears to have gone unnoticed, as US Uncut reported. But this series of leaked emails show a meticulously plotted coordination between DNC narratives touting Clinton, rather than Sanders, as if she had been the presumptive nominee from the outset — precisely as activists and fair elections advocates had suspected.
Under the heading “Tactics,” the document states, “Working with the DNC and allied groups, we will use several different methods to land these attacks” — including, under the subheading, “Reporter Outreach”:
“Working through the DNC and others, we should use background briefings, prep with reporters for interviews with GOP candidates, off-the-record conversations and oppo pitches to help pitch stories with no fingerprints and utilize reporters to drive a message.” And under “Bracketing Events,” the email states: “Both the DNC and outside groups are looking to do events and press surrounding Republican events to insert our messaging into their press and to force them to answer questions around key issues.”
@strait2016 @MsNonoESQ and this from Guccifer2.0 DNC hack shows corporate media is Clinton Inc prop: @NateSilver538 pic.twitter.com/ibhsmsbr3j
— WilmingtonNC4Bernie (@WNC4Bernie) June 16, 2016
Most revealing in this particular document is its conclusion, which reads, in part, “Our goal is to use this conversation to answer the questions who do we want to run against and how best to leverage other candidates to maneuver them into the right place.”
Guccifer 2.0 also leaked a two-page list titled “HRC election plans,” which, as US Uncut noted, includes a talking point that later appeared word for word in Clinton’s video announcement of her bid to run for president:
“Americans have fought their way back from tough economic times but the deck is still stacked for those at the top.”
Not only does this show a carefully-orchestrated spoonfeeding of vapid Clinton-isms to the ostensibly unsuspecting public, the irony of the former First Lady pontificating on ‘stacked decks’ for the elite bears a startling degree of hypocrisy in this context.
Prior to the release of these hacked documents, an analysis of election coverage by Neal Gabler, published in Truthout, evidenced startling favoritism for Clinton by the mainstream media throughout the 2016 election season thus far. While not entirely overt, the media’s fondness for Hillary often comprised propagandic semantic gymnastics to avoid showing Sanders in a rosy light.
Even as Sanders experienced growing success, the media downplayed its extent through comparisons with Trump — characterizing the two as ‘outsider’ candidates — thus creating a psychological parallel between the Vermont senator’s popularity and the demagoguery of the contentious billionaire.
Eventually, as Sanders continued to experience success despite a veritable media blackout, a few mainstream outlets resorted to outright hostility to achieve a pro-Clinton message. As Anti-Media previously reported, Newsweek’s Kurt Eichenwald published a scathing hit piece on not only Sanders, but his supporters, titled “Get Control, Senator Sanders, or Get Out.”
“So, Senator Sanders,” Eichenwald patronizingly penned, “either get control of what is becoming your increasingly unhinged cult, or get out of the race.”
To say the corporate, mainstream media has been complicit in a coordinated effort to grant Hillary the nomination would be an egregious understatement of reality. Though irate voters and journalists with actual integrity across the country immediately called out the Associated Press’ premature announcement Clinton had won the nomination as farce, it’s clear — particularly with these leaked emails — that had been the end game from the outset.
US Uncut reported neither the DNC nor the Clinton campaign returned request for comment.
DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ even rebuffed claims Sanders had not received fair treatment in the press during an April interview with the Daily Show’s Trevor Noah:
“You know, as powerful as that makes me feel, I’m not doing a very good job of rigging the outcome, or … blocking anyone from being able to get their message out.”
Evidence, however, would beg to differ.





Shocking...
Shocking that I'm FIRST Bitchez!
The hell you say...the fact that media, and a select group of assholes would rig things to make Shillary electable...
Just illustrates how far gone we really are.
It is not only the right, but the duty of mainstream media outlets to promote the candidate that they believe is most competent and deserving of the Presidency. It would be utterly immoral for a media outlet to give 'fair' coverage to candidates who threaten the peace and stability of our nation, and seek to disrupt the political process in ways that could permanently damage our liberal democracy. The duty of every media outlet is to promote the common good of the American people, using every tool available to them Those who control influential media platforms have the power to shape America politically and socially. It is up to those blessed with this privilege to use their influence for good, by promoting peace, tolerance and equality, and to protect America from radical ideologies that if given a platform, threaten to destroy America as we know it.
A responsible media would have told the DNC to fuck off.
Debbie L has been doing a great job tracking the treachery.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5ZqA87dL5E
The corporate media serves its owners and the owners want HRC. Our rulers want HRC.
I'm gonna go be sick now.
Just put yourself in the media's shoes for a moment. If you are presented with a candidate who repeatedly espouses racist and xenophobic views, is it not your responsibility to warn the general public of this candidate's alarming tendencies, so that viewers are able to avoid making a regretful voting decision? Similarly, if one candidate stands head shoulders above the rest, both in terms of political experience and vision for the country, is it not your responsibility to present this candidate as the default choice to viewers who may not have the political savvy to discern which of the candidates is most politically competent?
I was making the exact same point to your daughter last night as I was pushing my dick into her mouth (after knocking out her teeth, of course... I'm no fool). And I was patiently saying to her and making the same point that though I'm being firm it's really for her own good that she understand that the DNC, and your daughter's current sword swallowing situation by proxy, only want what's best for the people.
Bwahahahahahaha! This is how the Democrats are inciting the very same monster that they created to turn on them. The same fucks who try to disrupt Trump rallies are going to be the same fucks who get violent at the DNC. We don't give a fuck, because, when that monster gets truly violent and switches from rocks to molotovs, we'll just shoot it, but this is sweet, sweet irony.
Laugh while you can.
Hillary supporters are some of the dumbest fucking people I have ever come across in my life.
The stupidity, denial and ignorance is breathtaking.
What's really frustrating is when they are people you are related to and love and care about. On one hand you want to give them a hug and on the other hand you want to knock some sense into them.
People are natural born cowards. The ones who go first and fight the cave bear get killed. The ones who hang back and say "me too" survive. Genetic breeding is an inescapable fact of life.
but then a number of cave bears did get killed and probably the killers got "thanked" and so into the gene pool.
compare and contrast mdb's two entries. imo the first is among the better efforts (i upvoted it as quality work), sufficiently vague and confusing to pass muster. however the second seems less so as it moves the conversation from dnc fucking over sanders to opposition to trump, basically a straw man in these circumstances, imo. there is a bit of shilly shallying toward the end but keep at it.
i'm also not so sure the people disrupting trump will be the ones disrupting philly (bernie supporters). the whole modus operandi of the former feels more like clintonian dirty tricks.
Release. The. List. Of. Recipients.
HRC can request all the propaganda she wants, but who are the drones that are receiving this stuff... and what exactly were they publishing in the days and weeks following.
Of coarse its Clinton support behind it. Who wins by having Bernie fingered as the guy who is the leaders of the nutz attacking Trump supporters, Hillary does. She gets to have the false talking points about Trump repeated non-stop and get to have Bernie portrayed as the leader of the Brown shirts. Meanwhile she looks like a moderate when in fact she is straight up evil.
JM,
Yes, cave bears did get killed, and heroes did, thankfully, end up in the gene pool. Your comment made me think, "OMG, what if all the heroes got killed. Then, I guess, none of us we be alive, because Neocon Armchair Generals never step up and fight, so something would have killed off our whole species.
I think MDB is a master of sarcasm, and therefore I enjoy his posts. His posts take TPTB's positions and state them so clearly that the flaws are clearly visible. :-)
I think it is likely that the Trump-rally disruptors are Hillary/Soros employees and hangers-on. Plausible denial: "Whenever you're going to do something heinous, first prepare your alibi and locate a patsy to blame for what you actually did." I just reread Shogun, and in it, every one of the Warlords blamed every one of his misdeeds on some patsy. Every time. It works. :-)
+1 BOP.
We are 27th in the world in education, but we are #1 in stupidity, denial and ignorance...Amercian Exceptionalism at its finest! USA, USA, USA...
They support Crooked Obama because "we owe black people".
They support Crooked Hillary because "we owe women".
And they are afraid to dig into the details, which are that both Crooked Obama and Crooked Hillary have hurt many black people and many women.
I have never met anyone who honestly was a Hitlery supporter.
I live in California. And some of my friends are literal celebrity-worshippers (despite being otherwise mostly intelligent). They condescendingly assume that anyone who would vote for Trump for ANY reason simply isn't following the "news".
One of the guys is in broadcasting, so clearly he must know more than I. His wife? Space cadet.
{I suggest the following litmus test: anyone who is offended by the celebrity treatment in "Team America: World Police" is like my friends (see above). That doesn't mean the rest will ALL agree with you, but the probabilities improve. FYI, the unrated DVD is available for like $5 -- you have to see it to understand how the marrionette sex scenes could possibly be unrated. Then ......... you'll know.}
Or is it complacency?
Say it ain't so! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_cattle_futures_controversy
Instagram accounts worth examining:
Babes for Trump
Babes for Hillary
Babes for Bernie.
Please visit all three.
Seeing as how your name is Ignatius I don't doubt it. Couple of black eyes too I bet...
El Vaq,
I am starting to see things in a new light. The coming collapse might be a blessing in disguise.
There are people, a small minority, who are prepared, and there is a vast majority who are unprepared. Recall the way most people react and behave when there is a blizzard, a power outage or some other such natural inconvenience. They are paralyzed with indecision and fear. So imagine how they will react to an all-out calamity where no outside help is coming: they will simply die.
The independent thinkers with foresight and intelligence who have prepped will survive. The young and healthy and bold but who have not prepped will survive long enough by their violence but will self-identify themselves as enemies of civilization worthy of elimination when they come to try to take your stuff. So they will be eliminated as well.
And who will be left to continue the civilization? Those who are intelligent enough and hardworking enough and who were paying enough attention to have adequately prepared.
And I'm starting to not be able to see anything wrong with that. And quite a bit right. Big cities? What do we need them for? The cities are vestigial organs, once needed as residences for throngs of factory workers. We don't need them anymore, now they are only centers of welfarism and dependency. They will be the first to self-eliminate.
Seriously, someone tell me why we need big cities?
Agreed. You've described K-selection in action.
to support the arts: ballet, theater, opera, museums, symphony orchestras.
it's hard to imagine substituting a computer screen for being there. however i doubt this is sufficient justification for their myriad ills.
we might also lose spectator team sports however i'm not as concerned there.
Seriously, someone tell me why we need big cities?
The short answer is go read Jacob's "Cities and the Wealth of Nations".
Longer answer: cities provide the vital laboratories for testing new ideas in commerce, fashion, design, etc. You could never have created Starbucks, for example, in a small town; there would not have been a large enough market. Cities provide a kaleidoscope of sensory inputs, which stimulates creativity and cross-pollination of ideas. Yes, some of these things can be replaced by the internet, but it's like the difference between internet porn and real sex. What would you prefer, versus what can you get?
A world without Starbucks ... THE HORROR.
After any significant level of civil disruption, I'd not be betting on the Internet being operational, let alone comparably functional to what we saw way back in the 1990's.
When I look and see the outright fucking stupidity, it does make me look forward to a collapse. Holy fuck.
BTW, I just ordered a stripped AR-10 lower yesterday and picked up a couple of mags. I just need a hand guard, gas block, gas tube and charging handle and the upper will be done. The barrel that I purchased is 24" and is chambered in .260 Rem, and so long as it likes the Nosler 142gr Long Range Accubonds, it will still be supersonic at 2000yds at my altitude. Not that I'm going to be hitting shit at that range, but it makes shots at half that range a lot easier. I figure I've got about $400 worth of parts to complete it, plus optics, and plus when I eventually get around to upgrading the milspec trigger to something nice.
When you and Simon black are in the bunker together, he's going to try to eat your liver at some point.
Just fair warning.
The Gamma Rats are the most important ones when it comes to survival when the chips are down. The Alpha's are retarded bullies, and the Beta's are syncophantic lickspittles following them over the cliff.
Become the Gamma.
Don't be too confident. It will pay to remember the interaction between the British Army and the Zulus.
There are MANY more of "them" than you (as you noted), and "intelligence" manifests itself in many ways. Regarding your enemy as "inferior" has been shown to result in YOUR defeat (the Romans, Napoleon, Hitler . . . .).
Plan for an engagement with a capable opposition, and surival "may" be more probable. However consider their numerical advantage, and maybe timely relocation may be more intelligent than confrontation.
The game is rigged.
The laws apply to you, not to them.
The media supports them and disses you.
Illegal, hired thugs attack your people, the cops watch.
Prominent Democrats all line up behind Hitlery, Trump has to deal with a fifth column within the Republican party.
You gather the votes to exit the EU, they shoot one of their own, point at you and cancel the referendum.
If you take your "eyes from the prize" even for a second, for any reason, you lose.
No compromise. No dialog. No quarter.
Meh... don't worry. joe and mika are already poo pooing any of this new info. The gay guys that sit at the table with them are snickering at it also.
Because you'll be crying soon enough!
Bernie is attending a bankers' convention. He sends his regards:
RON PAUL, FACEBOOK 2010: "Bernie Sanders has sold out and sided with [Sen.] Chris Dodd to gut Audit the Fed in the Senate. His 'compromise' is what the administration and banking interests want," Paul wrote on Facebook.
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/96587-ron-paul-says-bernie-sanders-qsold-outq-on-fed-amendment
RON PAUL 2010: I'm not a bit surprised the Federal Reserve got to the Senate. I had expected Bernie Sanders to offer 604 which is the same as 1207, Audit the Fed bill. And at the last minute he switched it, watered it down, and really it adds nothing. It's a possibility it even makes the current conditions worse. This is essentially the bill plus more of the bill we beat in the House Financial Committee, the Mel Watts' bill. This is so disappointing to me that this happened, especially since for months now I've worked with Bernie on this.
It also shows what kind of forces we're up against. The President doesn't want this, the leadership on Wall Street doesn't want it, the Federal Reserve doesn't want it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7II2diHymv4
After many years of trying to pass a meaningful Fed audit and increasing grassroots pressure, Paul's bill finally had a good chance of passing the Senate intact.
shadowproof.com/2010/05/06/ron-paul-says-bernie-sanders-sold-out-sided-with-chris-dodd-to-gut-audit-the-fed/
Calm down. MDB is satire.
Dock,
MDB is NOT satire. He has fully admitted that his writings are not satirical. He has an entire website filled with this head-up-his ass thinking.
It's time to stop paying any attention to him.
It was almost amusing while he was hiding his true beliefs enough that most people thought it was satire, but the writing was just too weak and broke the most critical rule of satire (your reader must know that it's satire).
But it is neither humorous nor entertaining and this dipshit and his liberty-destroying beliefs and textual vomit need to be completely ignored after one or two refutations.
Yes, but he does create a devil's advocate perspective that gets the ZH readership thinking, regardless if it's real or satire. He also doesn't flame the boards like certain bitcoi n-related commenters of years past. I'll give him credit for that.
The rest I sometimes just choose to ignore. Don't forget that opinions here are like assholes- everyone has one, and you don't have to listen what comes out of them.
Did you notice the name of MDB's blog? "Accredited Times"? A little clue?
You have to be pretty dense not to realize that MDB is taking the piss.
<hiccup>
Calm down. MDB is satire.
Biggest joke going is the DNC's strategy is complete shit against a guy like Trump that feeds on outrageousness and is gifted at hammering people in social media.
Sniff, sniff........you smell something burning?!
You're an idiot; not worth the time or patience of the good souls here at ZH.
Stop embarrassing yourself by posting treadworn nonsense.
"is it not your responsibility to warn the general public of this candidate's alarming tendencies, so that viewers are able to avoid making a regretful voting decision?"
Why did the media shirk this responsibility to inform the " the not so savvy" in 2008 and 2012? MDB do you even half ass believe the crap that you spew?
MBD stands behind his opinions.
As I will stand behind his mother later tonight.
Yes are right. I cannot believe that people woukd be supporting a sexist and a racist of Bernie Sanders caliber.
Truly appalling that people would be so ignorant as to back a xenophobic candidate like Bernie Sanders.
It is a blessing that we have caring media to shield us from such mistakes.