'Ignorant Masses' Warn 'Elites' - "Go Ahead, Rise Up... But Be Careful What You Wish For"

Tyler Durden's picture

Via CommunityConservatives.com,

And so it’s on…

James Traub, at Foreign Policy.com, has called for the “elites to rise up against the ignorant masses.”



In a spectacular display of the very ignorance against which he issues his call to arms, Traub shows how thoroughly infected the establishment is with their group-think.  God forbid the ‘fist shaking’ rabble would actually think for themselves and effect an “utter repudiation of the bankers and economists and Western heads of state who warned voters against the dangers of a split with the European Union.”  If there was a miscalculation on the part of David Cameron, it was “how utterly he misjudged his own people[‘s ability to think for themselves].”

Rise up against the ignorant masses? Be careful what you wish for, Mr. Traub… Your intellectual nakedness just might end up on full, public display.

The Foundational Issue: The Most Significant Unit of Society

Traub shows himself ignorant of both British and American history when he concludes: “[M]aybe we have become so inclined to celebrate the authenticity of all personal conviction that it is now elitist to believe in reason, expertise, and the lessons of history.”

Philosophically, ‘Scottish Common Sense Realism’ provides a framework for understanding how someone’s thinking would begin with ‘personal conviction’.  This framework lies at the heart of the thinking of authors like John Locke, on whom Thomas Jefferson depended heavily when writing the Declaration of Independence.

Locke’s philosophy of government and economics expresses this framework and stands in stark contrast to that of Thomas Hobbes. Between the two of them we can drive the difference down to a single question: What is the most significant unit of society?  The answer for those who would follow Hobbes is the State.  For those who would follow Locke it would be the individual.

Money and Monetary Policy: The Scaffolding of Society

At the heart of debates over economics, then, lies the matter of money.  If you are inclined to build on Hobbes’ premises, money is a tool of the State for ordering the affairs of society.  If you build on Locke’s foundation, money is a utility contrived first by individuals to facilitate commerce.  If we revisit the debate between Keynesian and Austrian economics, these two presumptions about the nature of money animate each philosophy.  Keynes presumed an essentially Progressive, statist understanding of human government.  His prescriptions for monetary policy follow quite logically.

The problem with Keynesian economics at this point in history (which Traub at least recognizes to be singular) is he could not have foreseen either the computer or how it has changed banking on the one hand and supply-chain management on the other.  Neither could he have entertained the deployment of massive amounts of capital to essentially speculative financial products – most of which would have been illegal in his time.  These two things have conspired to elevate what Keynes called the “Zero Level Boundary” to a point above zero where money has been made so cheap that the actual creation of new wealth (by improving things) cannot compete with speculation and stock buy-backs for available capital.  Or in other words: when the chips are free, who wouldn't gamble?

But putting that otherwise necessary debate aside, Traub believes the elites are on the side of Madame History, so let’s consult with her.

The First and Second Bishops Wars (late 1630s - early 1640s) revolved around church order and leadership.  Today it is hard to appreciate the degree to which social order broadly speaking depended on church order in this time.  Charles I tried to enforce ecclesiastical uniformity throughout his kingdom, but the Scots were not having it.  Charles assembled an army to impose his order despite difficulty raising the needed money.  The First Bishops War resulted in further negotiations.  The resulting repudiation of Anglican order resulted in the calling of a Parliament, which subsequently demanded redress for both ecclesiastical and economic (tax) grievances.

Charles responded by dissolving Parliament.  This time, to raise the needed funds to pay his soldiers, he confiscated the gold held in the Royal Mint as a forced loan.  This gold did not belong to the Crown but to English merchants.  While the loans were paid back, as a result of this monetary impunity merchants began depositing their gold with trusted goldsmiths.  They received a receipt in return.

These receipts then began to circulate in place of the gold as a medium of exchange for goods and services.  The goldsmiths also realized that not all receipts would be presented for redemption at once and began issuing ‘extra’ receipts, lending them out at interest.  ‘Fractional reserve banking’ was born and these receipts became a forerunner to paper money (e.g. the Federal Reserve Note).

There are two things about this history which are instructive for us today: The first is the confiscation of the money supply by a ‘sovereign’ to enforce his preferred order on society.  Those who understand Hobbes’ philosophy also understand that a ‘sovereign’ need not be a monarch.  A bureaucracy, or an assemblage of them such as the European Union, can wield the power of a sovereign just as can a monarch and its palace. And that bureaucratic sovereign can rule with the same impunity which eventually drove matters to the English Civil Wars. But that impunity is not possible without control of the money supply. Second, this history clearly validates the premise that money is (and always will be) first a utility contrived by individuals to engage in everyday commerce.

It also exposes the underlying problem of monetary policy we face today: It should be clear that those (Traub and his elites) who espouse a Hobbesian philosophy of government would view money as a tool of the State.  Too bad history is not on their side.  And those Traub so artfully calls ignorant ‘fist shakers’ – well, they just want their money back.

Money and ‘Globalization’

Traub believes ‘globalization’ to be the root of the problem and caricatures the ‘fist shakers’ as older, xenophobic rabble pining for the cultural homogeneity of the past. This is a convenient straw man, as it does not account for the underlying stream of Scottish Common Sense Realism that continues to animate the thinking of ordinary people and, rather inconveniently, undermines the superiority complex of the elites.

The arguments for globalization generally claim a net economic gain for ‘free trade’ agreements.  But let’s look at the underlying data: First, these claims require that we treat all jobs alike.  For those who work in close proximity to the money supply – controlled as it is by what I will call (deliberately evoking echoes of Dwight Eisenhower) the ‘political/financial complex’ – a service-sector job and a manufacturing job are counted the same.  But when counted separately we see a dramatic shift away from manufacturing jobs toward lower paying, service-sector jobs.  The problems with this are both social and economic.

Economically, we become further and further removed from the creation of wealth.  A manufacturing job is, by definition, a job in which raw materials – which by themselves would be useless – are turned into useful things.  The difference between the value of that useful thing and the value of the underlying raw materials is what wealth is.  A service sector job, on the other hand, merely provides a needed or desired service to a consumer and does not directly contribute to the creation of wealth.

As a result, socially, we become an economy of mansions, butlers and maids.  What is especially maddening about this is it reflects the very income inequality we constantly hear about from the elites.  But if equality were really what the elites were after, they would insist we bring the regular population back into closer proximity to the creation of wealth.

But this is not what is being demanded; the rabble is required to assent to the redistributionist wisdom of the elites who view government, and as a result money, in a way that is fundamentally opposite to the traditions of individual freedom which form the foundation of what it means to be American.  The elites are fundamentally demanding sovereign control over the social order.  Just as did King Charles I.

And the ‘fist shakers’ are saying no.  Just as did the Scots and the English merchants after them.

Money and the ‘Fabrication of Reality’

Traub’s claim that the ‘nativist’ forces on the right – both on the matter of Brexit and here in the United States – are ‘fabricating reality’ is especially rich.  The British population was apparently subject to lies about the dangers of immigration.  Yet in Germany, a citizens’ group is using Google Maps to tag by location the instances of sexual crimes reported as being committed by migrants from the Middle East.  With other parts of the ‘elite’ telling us that women claiming sexual abuse should be believed, Traub and his tribe have some explaining to do: Who, it might be asked, is doing the ‘fabricating’?

And that question only gets more pressing when we look at economic series here in the U.S..  Starting with unemployment: In the late 1970s the U.S. Congress was faced with the hot potato of high unemployment.  Instead of making tough fiscal choices to keep the government from consuming resources which would have been more efficiently deployed by the private sector, they tossed the hot potato over to the Federal Reserve.  The Humphrey-Hawkins Act of 1977 added “full employment” to the Federal Reserve’s original mandate of consumer price stability.

Now if we were to return to the calculation methodology for unemployment prior to the passage of Humphrey-Hawkins, and then plug in the data available from then until now, the utter failure of the Fed to foster full employment would become painfully obvious.  But this would also mean Congress would have to come to terms with a simple fact: the Federal Reserve does not have – and has never had – the necessary tools to foster full employment.  This has always been about Congress hiding from its fiscal responsibilities.  And the ‘reality’ of employment in America has been ‘fabricated’ ever since by changing the calculation methodologies to hide the truth.  Again, it must be asked, who is doing to fabricating?

Then we move to inflation. In the early 1990s the Clinton administration and the Republican Congress led by Newt Gingrich were faced – again – with having to make tough fiscal choices principally to keep Social Security solvent.  And, again, they copped out.  This time they decided to change the manner in which the Consumer Price Index was calculated in order to suppress the growth of government benefits and the costs of borrowing.  It is important here to understand that interest rates are a function of the rate of inflation, which is reported as the Consumer Price Index.  While that might seem arcane, the following is not: No one refinances a debt at a higher interest rate.

So, having copped out on making tough fiscal choices, Clinton-Gingrich sent us down an unsustainable path of borrowing to the point where the United States Treasury, after paying for government programs, does not have enough money to even make the ‘coupon payments’ (also known as interest) on its bonds, to say nothing of redeeming the maturing bonds – the very textbook definition of ‘bankrupt’.  As a result, the reported rate of inflation has to be ‘fabricated’ to support ever-lower interest rates and the ‘debt ceiling’ constantly raised to enable serial refinancing of the national debt.

Thus something as fundamental to consumer prices as rent – which is rising at around eight percent a year – is not counted in the CPI.  Prices such as food and energy – as if the consumer is not impacted by these either – are also not counted.  The ‘experts’ Traub thinks so highly of tell us this is because of the ‘volatility’ of these prices.  Yet even a rudimentary understanding of economics is enough to know that this same volatility is exactly the data which should be warning us of a problem with monetary policy.  But Congress does not want to hear the truth, and so the elites must ‘fabricate reality’.

Be Careful What You Wish For

Traub’s call is for the ‘elites’ to rise up against the ‘ignorant masses’.  Yes, indeed, please do.  But be careful what you wish for.  You just might discover that we are having the very same argument had between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton at the beginning of the Republic.  Consider the following comment from Jefferson, especially in light of the last financial crisis and its wave of foreclosures:

If the American People ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers occupied. The issuing power of money should be taken from the bankers and restored to Congress and the people to whom it belongs. I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies.

What is happening today has been brewing for a long time.  The elites will be exposed for their fabrication of reality and the Scottish Common Sense Realism that forms the philosophical foundation of the American idea of self-government will be vindicated.  The British have struck the first blow in an epic battle that will return us to sound money and the creation of vast amounts of new wealth – and eventually to freedom itself over debt slavery.

And it will be this return to creating wealth measured by sound money that will return us to an economy where that wealth is broadly and justly enjoyed by a thriving and growing middle class who are actually making things again.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
qdone's picture

it'll be nice to see madame lafarge agin'. 

HopefulCynical's picture

Let's get ready to ruuummmble!

And by rumble, of course I mean pitchforks, tar and woodchippers.

Chris Dakota's picture
Chris Dakota (not verified) HopefulCynical Jun 30, 2016 10:59 AM

As per census

Average age of Whites in USA-56 yrs old

Average age of Hispanics USA  -9 yrs old

Here Are The Names Of The Jews Behind The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:

1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign Relations)

Buckaroo Banzai's picture


Stuck on Zero's picture

It's interesting that elite intellectuals are angry that the unwashed masses think their opinions are the equal of their own. These same intellectuals have steered the education system of the the Western World into teaching this very egalitarianism. Hoisted by their own petards.

Kayman's picture

If these self-proclaimed "elite intellectuals" had any smarts beyond their narrow viewpoint of the world and their disdain for "lesser beings" then they wouldn't be so visible.

Public bleatings about the sky-is-falling and gathering in groups isn't the best long-term plan.

Every single one of them is a bought-and-paid-for shill for dirty money.

Just remember to NOT listen to the "your vote doesn't matter" crowd.  Your vote damn well does matter or you wouldn't be seeing so many "hair-on-fire" shills squirming around.


Marshall law for your own good will be the next move, then it will be game on.

NoDebt's picture

Please refer to my tirade from yesterday's article about this asshole.  I doubt I could add much more to it.  Felt better to get that out than finally passing a kidney stone.


Manthong's picture

Absolutely great article, but I wish it didn’t end with a bogus Jefferson quote.



Other good writers and commentators have made the same mistake.

frankly scarlet's picture

Everyone seems to put Jefferson on a pedestal and forgets about a true believer in the rights of human kind Thomas Paine.. Jefferson was a member of the Elites of his day and a warmonger to boot.  In Jefferson's words the taking of Canada will be a "mere matter of marching" as his opinion of the War of 1812-14. For all his fine words talk is cheap but personal actions are the real "tell".

LawsofPhysics's picture

+1, haven't heard that expression in a while.

Syrin's picture

Think about that comment.   Who in the world calls themselves "elite"?  If you had a screenplay in which the villain made that statement, they would be told to re-write because of unbelievable dialogue, yet this fuckhead actually said it.  


They WANT you to rise up so they can collapse the economy then tell you the problem is that the EU wasn't centralized enough.   These "elite" need to suffer acute lead poisoning before they can enact their truly evil plans.

HopefulCynical's picture

Acute chronic high-velocity lead poisoning, at that.

Rusty Shorts's picture
Brexit Part Of Elite's Predesigned Collapse - Daryl Bradford Smith



SillySalesmanQuestion's picture

/ |
| |
| 0
| /|\
| |
| /\

jus_lite_reading's picture

His level of contemptuousness is something I have not seen from someone in the public eye in a very long time. Perhaps he has a death wish. Seek, and ye shall find, motherfucker.

liverdiefree's picture

Imbecile. And two Jewish members of congress did this all on their own. 

sharonsj's picture

Four Congressmen do not pass a bill by themselves.  And once passed, the bill must be signed into law by a president.  You are nothing but a racist.

JRobby's picture

All Patriots are racists to the brainwashed sheep

chunga's picture

Firing the Elites



The purpose of nationalism is to support the nation-state. Where nationalism serves the needs of one’s native land and people, nationalism and patriotism become aligned; when it destroys them, nationalism becomes the enemy and patriots form partisan movements, rise up and destroy the nation-state.

JRobby's picture

The larger and more distant GOVT becomes, both ideologically and physically from it's constituents, the more corrupt it becomes. Obviously, the USSA then the EU are a clear example of that. And they want it bigger!!

NWO / World GOVT would be the ultimate expression of corruption in practice and control.

LooseLee's picture

Jewish is not a race; it is a belief system.

Jeffersonian Liberal's picture

You're actually wrong there, sorry to say.

Talmudic law believes that the Jewish people are the "chosen" and it is their bloodline that makes them The Chosen. This is why the bloodline is matri-linear. That is, a child is only considered "Jewish" if the mother is Jewish, not the father. Why? Because if it is a Jewish father and a Goy woman, the woman could cheat and there would be no Jewish blood. Jewish mother and Goy father, the bloodline trickles down.

And most Jews who identify themselves as Jewish do believe themselves to be a race apart from all other races.



Syrin's picture

Actually, he's right, and you validate it by telling us what they believe.  Judaism is a religion/belief system no matter what they believe.  If I believe I am a woman, slap on a dress and call myself Caitlyn, every single cell in my body is still XY.  What I believe is incosequential.

Jeffersonian Liberal's picture

Did you really miss the point that I was making, that self-identifying Jews do, in fact, consider themselves a separate race?

Did you really miss that?

We'd have to do a full genetic study to determine whether they are, biologically, a separate race. Short of that scientific study, however, that will not stop them from believing this and acting in their own self interest, which, to oblige their beliefs, we should refer to as "racist."





Tarzan's picture

The son's of Isaac, "Jews" a modern term, are an ethnicity and Judaism it's predominant religion. 

That religion teaches these sons have been made an eternal promise from God through Abram, one of many promises found in Genesis.

 I will always keep the promise I have made to you and your descendants, because I am your God and their God. I will give you and them the land in which you are now a foreigner. I will give the whole land of Canaan to your family forever, and I will be their God. 

Gen 17:7-8


Now these descendants of Isaac are being gathered from the nations , back into this land, and the world shocked!  

I recognize the sins of the Jews, and the sensible reasoning that makes the Jews detestible in the worlds eyes.  They don't deserve our billions in aid, nor do they need it.

It was God who gathered them back to His holy mountains, not for their sake, but for His name and the promises he made to their forefathers.

As the world kicks against the existence of the nation of Israel, they kick against God!  He choose the lowliest among us as his own, and will prove to the world his word is his bond!

    "As a shepherd cares for his herd in the day when he is among his scattered sheep, so I will care for My sheep and will deliver them from all the places to which they were scattered on a cloudy and gloomy day. "I will bring them out from the peoples and gather them from the countries and bring them to their own land; and I will feed them on the mountains of Israel, by the streams, and in all the inhabited places of the land. "I will feed them in a good pasture, and their grazing ground will be on the mountain heights of Israel. There they will lie down on good grazing ground and feed in rich pasture on the mountains of Israel.… Ezekiel 34:12-14

They're not a good people, they've embarrassed God everywhere they've been scattered, but they're His people.  They should loath themselves, as God blesses them, not for their sack, but for his holy name's sack!

    "I will vindicate the holiness of My great name which has been profaned among the nations, which you have profaned in their midst. Then the nations will know that I am the LORD," declares the Lord GOD, "when I prove Myself holy among you in their sight. "For I will take you from the nations, gather you from all the lands and bring you into your own land. Ezekiel 36:23-24

    "I will multiply the fruit of the tree and the produce of the field, so that you will not receive again the disgrace of famine among the nations. "Then you will remember your evil ways and your deeds that were not good, and you will loathe yourselves in your own sight for your iniquities and your abominations. "I am not doing this for your sake," declares the Lord GOD, "let it be known to you. Be ashamed and confounded for your ways, O house of Israel!"  Ezekiel 36:31-33


    "You have not heard, you have not known. Even from long ago your ear has not been open, Because I knew that you would deal very treacherously; And you have been called a rebel from birth. "For the sake of My name I delay My wrath, And for My praise I restrain it for you, In order not to cut you off. "Behold, I have refined you, but not as silver; I have tested you in the furnace of affliction.… Isaiah 48:8-10


    "And you will know that I am the LORD, when I bring you into the land of Israel, into the land which I swore to give to your forefathers. "There you will remember your ways and all your deeds with which you have defiled yourselves; and you will loathe yourselves in your own sight for all the evil things that you have done. "Then you will know that I am the LORD when I have dealt with you for My name's sake, not according to your evil ways or according to your corrupt deeds, O house of Israel," declares the Lord GOD.'"… Ezekiel 20:42-44

Israel is the hammer of God, by which the nations will know Him, when they surround her from every side, and seek to drive them from the land He's gathered them into, and by His own hand saves them from the invading armies.  They are the hook, by which God will gather the warmongers into the valley of Jehoshaphat, by which He will reveal Himself to the world!

"For behold, in those days and at that time, When I restore the fortunes of Judah and Jerusalem, 2I will gather all the nations And bring them down to the valley of Jehoshaphat. Then I will enter into judgment with them there On behalf of My people and My inheritance, Israel, Whom they have scattered among the nations; And they have divided up My land.  Joel 3:1-2

Tall Tom's picture




I am inclined to agree strongly with David Duke and, more importantly, with the Genetic Studies. David Duke certainly does not support Zionism. And I will not argue the SCIENCE.


There is a racial basis for Judaism.




Genetic Scientists agree.


You can write about unfounded beliefs and feelings all that you want.


About 80% of Jewish males and 50% of Jewish females trace their ancestry back to the Middle East

Read more: http://forward.com/culture/155742/jews-are-a-race-genes-reveal/#ixzz4D5VPNBWf



“Viewed in the context of Jewish history,” Ostrer wrote, “the genetic makeup of contemporary Jewish populations has been influenced by the geographic origins of a relatively small number of founders... Following the destruction of the Jewish kingdoms more than 2,000 years ago, the Jews became a migratory people who established communities throughout the world. Some of these communities retained their continuity over long periods of time.




I like Genes and Chromosomes. I am a proponent of both the  Physical Sciences and Natural Sciences....when they are performed as a Science...and not to promote a Political or Social Agenda.


But youguys can knock yourselves out. You can argue about your FEELINGS and DENY THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE at your peril. I cannot care less that you lack a rational brain cell in that disordered mush of Grey Matter.


What amazes me is that NOBODY used the Internet to invalidate or bolster their argument. Few here RESEARCH anything here anymore.


The quality of posts have declined as I read thoughts which cannot be defended.


And then WITH YOUR LACK OF INFORMATION and YOUR IGNORANCE you truly believe you stand a chance against the elite?



Syrin's picture

So I can change race by switching religions.   Epic.   Apparently if I put on a dress I am now female.   Same scientific logic.

Tall Tom's picture





DNA is not religion. You did not read the information.

flyingcaveman's picture

How does that stop a jewish woman from cheating and diluting the blood line?

ack's picture

Cuz if SHES the bloodline. Doesn't matter who SHE fucks. Conclusion: Keep your son's away from jewish women.   

Tall Tom's picture




...because you do not want your grandchildren having an absolute guarantee of inheriting the Kingdom of Heaven, right?


The entire race will be saved from damnation and destruction regardless if they accept Christ Jesus here on Earth...or not.


Romans 11:25 -28 states


25 I do not want you to be ignorant  of this mystery,  brothers and sisters, so that you may not be conceited:  Israel has experienced a hardening  in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in,  26 and in this way[a] all Israel will be saved.  As it is written:

“The deliverer will come from Zion;
    he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
27 And this is[b] my covenant with them
    when I take away their sins.”[c] 

28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies  for your sake; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs,



It is a license to sin and commit all sorts of horrible atrocities to the gentiles and they need not worry about the irinheritance whatsoever.


I am not writing about the counterfeit Jews referenced in Revelation 2:9 as they will be shocked at their damnation.


I know your afflictions and your poverty—yet you are rich!  I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not,  but are a synagogue of Satan.




While some may be strongly deluded and condemned as a result there are some who will reap unimaginable rewards, yes, what you may even consider unjust, yet YOU ARE NOT GOD ALMIGHTY.


And really there are none who will enter into the Kingdom upon their own righteousness as we all have sinned against God Almighty. That means that you do not deserve the unimaginable rewards also...and neither do I.



TxExPat's picture

The pratical point of the matter is that there is never any question as to who the mother actually was, where as the "father" and the "daddy" are quite often, different individuals...


Rusty Shorts's picture

Well the father of the "jews" was an Iraqi , was he not?  Abram walked out of the land of his father Ur , which was located in Iraq.  What exactly is a jew? As gentile Christians we had better get all of our ducks in a row before it is too late , believe me.  You won't hear this kind of talk in church. The churches have been bought off and are silent. Chrisitan zionism comes from that scumbag Scofield and his foolish mentor, Darby. Most Christians don't even know anything about what zionism really means and just who it is that called themselves neocons. It is a war for the minds of the American people. Right now it is a war of words here , except even though our armies are fighting these jewish wars for Israel, nevertheless it is a war of words here but one day it will be much more than that. That day is coming soon. These people will never let go and will never give up. They have too much at stake now. They are close, closer than any generation of these misfits have ever been and they taste victory for it is so close now for them. They rolled for all the money on 911 and they put all of the chips on red. There is no turning back now. As the former head of the US Army war college , Alan Sobrosky, a jew himself , has stated, they went for broke and if the American people ever find out who actually did 911, there will be hell to pay and since he said some very bad things, I am not going to go there right now. But you get the picture, I hope. 

Antiborge's picture

This is a reason why I chose Jesus to seek to follow. Jesus visited Paul or Saul at the time and told him he would be sent to the Gentiles or Nations to teach the word of God and love by sacrifice. And as the scriptures state in the new testament we are not to be worried about flesh and BLOOD, but we seek the spirit of Love. Wisdom knows blood doesn't make one angry or emotional to do evil, but anger makes the blood  boil. Problem is we all walk around as hypocrits trusting in our own ways thinking we have it all figured out. Take me for example. I am a hypocrit.  I am having a hard time staying sober and keeping out of debt in this world. At least I can see my wrong to know what I need to fix, but I do feel helpless and foolish being this hypocrit that I am. Jewish or not salvation doesn't come by blood according to Jesus. Feelings push one to sin not blood but only the wise would hear that, as the foolish wait for their blood to save them so they can continue to do evil and deceive themselves that the kingdom of heaven operates in evil.

Antiborge's picture

Actually it could have to do with blood because of Issac. But I am willing to say we are all mixed breeds now. What the hell do I know. Forget I said anything.


PRO.223's picture

A Hypocrit says one thing and does another, if you say you are not struggling, but are in private, you are a hypocrit. But if you admit to struggling in your walk with Christ, you're not a hypocrit... you're honest.

East Indian's picture

Chosen for what?


The answer is unbelievably ironic. Find it out.

LooseLee's picture

Quite right. They 'believe' themselves to be (enter whatever you wish). Fact is, their 'chosen-ness' is an illusion born of thinking (grounded in knowledge) and unrelated to 'actuality. They ate the fruit (the idea of 'myself') of the tree of knowledge. The rest is history. There is only one 'race'. That 'race' is human. To attempt to distinguish oneself from that is to partake of the fruit of the tree of knowledge and the deception that goes with it. Get it?

Mat Cauthon's picture

Most Jews today aren't from blood, but from conversion.  During the Babylonian exile following the overthrow of Jerusalem by Titus, the Pharisees... the ones Jesus called the Spawn of Satan, re-wrote the Torah in their image, and thus Judaism is known as Talmudic.

The Pharisees then went and converted nations under the new Talmudic religion... in the 10th centuy they converted the King and aristocracy of a small nation known as Khazaria.

700 years later, a family from that nation migrated to Europe by the name of Bauer, changed their family name to Rothschild and the rest is history.

More Ammo's picture

Sorry but their story is that they are and a special "chosen" one.  Problem is that "Jews" is a farce as they are not decedents of Abraham or Israelites.

They are Khazarians and DNA evidence proves it.



They have been perfecting their lie for hundreds of years.  It is interesting how the system they used to rewrite/create their history mirrors the progressives playbook.

Jeffersonian Liberal's picture


And one man named Soros is not powerful enough to enact change in the U.S. of A.

HalinCA's picture

A friend of mine has a 20-something daughter who insisted that a black could not possibly racist because they 'were the oppressed'.  It took him a while to convince her she was wrong.  She actually leanred that the teachers she had in college were deliberately misleading her.


Curious why you think culture = race?  He may be a bigot, but he is not a racist.


Presumably you realize your logic error in your post?


VAD's picture

Parliamentary procedure?  Since when has that been a thing?

Bill of Rights's picture

Ha ha ha ha ya and your vote matters as well, we are laughing.

DownWithYogaPants's picture

Judaism is a religion not a race by the way.

Before you use a word perhaps you should look it up first.

Jason T's picture

The biggest problem by far is the % of hispanics that have bastard/illegitimate children..

53% of hispanics born to unwed mothers in 2014.. 

broken home is a broken economy and a fatherless home is even more disastrous.

flyingcaveman's picture

Why would you get married?  Dad and mom can pretend not to be married, so mom and the kids can get paid by the state.

Ipse Dixit's picture

Seems that single mothers, blacks and hispanics, together with 'the Jews', are to blame for everything.