9/11: Bush's Guilt, And The 28 Pages

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Eric Zuesse via Strategic-Culture.org,

On Friday July15th, as the national news media were either on vacation or preparing for the opening of the Trump National Convention on Monday the 18th, the long-awaited release of the ‘missing’ 28 pages from the US Senate’s 9/11 report occurred («DECEMBER 2002: JOINT INQUIRY INTO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES BEFORE AND AFTER THE TERRORIST ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001»). The official title of this document is «PART FOUR – FINDING, DISCUSSION AND NARRATIVE REGARDING CERTAIN SENSITIVE NATIONAL SECURITY MATTERS», and it constitutes pages 6-34 of a pdf. (Some writers mistakenly call it «29 pages».)

It «was kept secret from the public on the orders of former President George W. Bush», and remained secret under Bush’s successor Barack Obama, until that Friday night late in Obama’s Second Administration, right before a week of Republican National Convention news would be dominating the news (along with any racial incidents, which would be sure to distract the public even more from any indication of Bush’s guilt). The pdf was of a picture-file so as to be non-searchable by journalists and thus slow to interpret, and thus would impede press-coverage of it. The file was also of a very degraded picture of the pages, so as to make the reading of it even more uninviting and difficult. Well, that was a skillful news-release-and-coverup operation! The Federal Government had plenty of time to do this right, but they evidently had plenty of incentive to do it wrong. They’re not incompetent; the reasonable explanation is something worse than that. (After all, this information has been hidden from the public for all of the 13+ years since that report was published without the 28 pages at the end of 2002.)

What these 28 long-suppressed pages revealed was well summarized by one succinct reader who wrote:

"The Inquiry discloses that there is a very direct chain of evidence about financing and logistics… [that] goes from the Saudi Royal family (Amb. Bandar's wife and Bandar's checking account) and Saudi consulate employees (al Thumiari) to the agent handlers (Basnan and al Bayoumi) to some of the 9/11 hijackers (Khalid al-Mihdhar, Nawaf al-Hazmi)."

In other words, Prince Bandar bin-Sultan al-Saud, known in Washington as «Bandar Bush» (for his closeness to the Bush family), and who served at that time as Saudi Arabia’s Ambassador to the United States, paid tens of thousands of dollars to Saudi Arabia’s «handlers» who were directing two of the hijackers, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi. Also, one of Bandar’s subordinates at the Embassy, named al-Thumiari, was likewise paying the person who was paying and managing those two jihadists.

The report said:

"FBI files suggest that al-Bayoumi provided substantial assistance to hijackers Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi after they arrived in San Diego in February 2000… According to an October 14, 2002 FBI document, al-Bayoumi has ‘extensive ties to the Saudi Government’… According to the FBI, al-Bayoumi was in frequent contact with the Emir at the Ministry of Defense, responsible for air traffic control… Al-Bayoumi was receiving money from the Saudi Ministry of Defense… Al-Bayoumi was known to have access to large amounts of money from Saudi Arabia, despite the fact that he did not appear to hold a jobAl-Bayoumi’s pay increased during the time that al-Hazmi and al-Mihdhar were in the United States."

Also, an FBI agent testified on 9 October 2002 regarding al-Bayoumi, and said Bayoumi: 

"acted like a Saudi intelligence officer, in my opinion. And if he was involved with the hijackers, which it looks like he was, if he signed leases, if he provided some sort of financing… then I would say that there’s a clear possibility that there might be a connection between Saudi intelligence and UBL [Usama bin Laden]."

Moreover: «The FBI has now confirmed that only Osama Bassnan’s wife received money directly from Prince Bandar’s wife, but that al-Bayoumi’s wife attempted to deposit three of the checks from Prince Bandar’s wife, which were payable to Bassnan’s wife, into her own accounts… Bassnan was a very close associate of Omar al-Bayoumi’s and was in telephone contact with al-Bayoumi several times a day».

Furthermore: «Bassnan’s wife received a monthly stipend from Princess Haifa».

And: «On at least one occasion, Bassnan received a check directly from Prince Bandar’s account. According to the FBI, on May 14, 1998, Bassnan cashed a check from Bandar in the amount of $15,000. Bassnan’s wife also received at least one check directly from Bandar… for $10,000… FBI Executive Assistant Director D’Amuro commented on this financing: «I believe that we do have money going from Bandar’s wife, $2,000 a month up to about $64,000».


"On March 28, 2002, US and coalition forces retrieved the telephone book of Abu Zubayda, whom the US Government has identified as a senior al-Qa’ida operational coordinator. According to an FBI document, ‘a review of toll records has linked [to] ASPCOL Corporation in Aspen, Colorado… ASPCOL is the umbrella corporation that manages the affairs of the Colorado residence of Prince Bandar, the Saudi Ambassador… The US Government also located another Virginia number at an Usama bin Laden safehouse in Pakistan… [where a person was] interviewed by the FBI in June 2002. He could not explain why his number ended up at a safehouse in Pakistan, but stated that he regularly provides services to a couple who are personal assistants to Prince Bandar."

This has to be seen in the context of George W Bush’s very close and longstanding personal friendship with Prince Bandar, and also in the context of Bandar’s career.

Bandar has long been involved, both officially and unofficially, in the intelligence operations of the Saud family (which own Saudi Arabia). During October 2005 through January 2015, he served as secretary general of Saudi Arabia’s National Security Council, and he also was director general of the Saudi Intelligence Agency from 2012 to 2014. Furthermore, the just-released report asserts:

«The FBI also received reports from individuals in the Muslim community alleging that Bassnan might be a Saudi intelligence agent. According to a CIA memo, Basnan reportedly received funding and possibly a fake passport from Saudi Government officials. He and his wife have received financial support from the Saudi Ambassador to the United States and his wife… A CIA report also indicates that Bassnan traveled to Houston in 2002 and… that during that trip a member of the Saudi royal family provided Bassnan with a significant amount of cash… FBI information indicates that Bassnan is an extremist and a supporter of Usama bin Laden».

Regarding Shaykh al-Thumairy, he was «an accredited diplomat at the Saudi Consulate in Los Angeles and one of the ‘imams’ at the King Fahd Mosque… built in 1998 from funding provided by Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Abdulaziz. The mosque… is widely recognized for its anti-Western views».

The 28 pages also include lots more, but those facts give at least some solid indications of the links that Prince Bandar had to 9/11.

And other FBI offices than in San Diego were basically not even covered in the 28 pages; this was a rush-job by a Senate Committee, and with enormous resistance from the White House, which did everything they could to block the investigators.

Furthermore: none of this information is as solid as the sworn court-testimony of the captured former bagman for al-Qaeda, their bookkeeper who personally collected each one of the million-dollar cash donations to the organization and named many donors, including Prince Bandar, as having been among the people from whom he picked up those suitcases full of cash. He said of their donations: «It was crucial. I mean, without the money of the – of the Saudi you will have nothing». The authors of the Senate investigation report, never got any wind of this, because that man was in a US prison and held incommunicado until that court-case in October 2014. But it was virtually the entire Saud family – not merely Bandar – who funded 9/11.

So, we know that Bandar «Bush» was practically like a brother to George W Bush, but what other indications do we have of GWB’s guilt in the planning of the 9/11 attacks?

First of all, if he wasn’t involved in the attack’s planning, then he was grossly incompetent and uncaring, to the point of criminal negligence for the numerous attempts that the CIA had made to warn GWB that such an attack was being planned and would occur soon – that he simply ignored those warnings. Criminal negligence, however, isn’t the same as being a traitor. That’s far more serious, and it would entail Bush’s conscious desire for such an attack to occur. Such evidence does exist. Here it is:

Researcher Chris Whipple headlined at Politico, on 12 November 2015, «‘The Attacks Will Be Spectacular’», and he reported:

«Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US» The CIA’s famous Presidential Daily Brief, presented to George W. Bush on August 6, 2001, has always been Exhibit A in the case that his administration shrugged off warnings of an Al Qaeda attack. But months earlier, starting in the spring of 2001, the CIA repeatedly and urgently began to warn the White House that an attack was coming.

By May of 2001, says Cofer Black, then chief of the CIA’s counterterrorism center, ‘it was very evident that we were going to be struck, we were gonna be struck hard and lots of Americans were going to die.’ ‘There were real plots being manifested,’ Cofer’s former boss, George Tenet, told me in his first interview in eight years…

The crisis came to a head on July 10. The critical meeting that took place that day was first reported by Bob Woodward in 2006. Tenet also wrote about it in general terms in his 2007 memoir At the Center of the Storm.

But neither he nor Black has spoken about it publicly in such detail until now — or been so emphatic about how specific and pressing their warnings really were. Over the past eight months, in more than a hundred hours of interviews, my partners Jules and Gedeon Naudet and I talked with Tenet and the 11 other living former CIA directors for The Spymasters, a documentary set to air this month on Showtime.

The drama of failed warnings began when Tenet and Black pitched a plan, in the spring of 2001, called «the Blue Sky paper» to Bush’s new national security team. It called for a covert CIA and military campaign to end the Al Qaeda threat — ‘getting into the Afghan sanctuary, launching a paramilitary operation, creating a bridge with Uzbekistan.’ ‘And the word back,’ says Tenet, ‘was «we’re not quite ready to consider this. We don’t want the clock to start ticking». (Translation: they did not want a paper trail to show that they’d been warned.)»

Five days later, I wrote an article interpreting that, titled «Politico Reports Bush Knew 2001 Terror-Attack Was Imminent and Wanted It». Readers here are referred to that, for the continuation of the case here.

For additional information on the bonding between the Saudi aristocracy and the US aristocracy, see this and this. It’s important to understand in order to be able to understand why Obama helped to set up the 21 August 2013 Syrian sarin attack to be blamed on Bashar al-Assad, who is allied with Russia. The US is allied with the Saud family, against Russia; and Syria is allied with Russia and refuses to allow pipelines for gas from Qatar and oil from Saudi Arabia through Syria to replace gas and oil that Russia has been selling to the EU. (Like RFK Jr. properly headlined on 25 February 2016, «Syria: Another Pipeline War». That’s why the Sauds want Assad dead.)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
balz's picture

Of course 9/11 was an inside job and Bush knew it would happen. Cheney was the mastermind. Read "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert.

Handful of Dust's picture

That's another reason Trump called George Bush a liar, which is true.

RAT005's picture

Bush and all of Washington's guilt is evident in their cover-up of the facts that easily prove that the silly "airplanes knocked the buildings down" nonsense never happened.

Billy the Poet's picture

Seems like lots of cash was funneled to the hijackers. If they weren't a key element why the funding?

knukles's picture

Sure seeems like a lotta furreniers wuz in Merica when it happened, didn't it?

cheka's picture

hmmmm, it wasn't the dancing art students?


Bastiat's picture

America will never "be great again" until the truth is told and the guilty prosecuted.

yellowsub's picture

Please, Americans have been engrained into their feeble minds the "official" narrative.  Even if Bush was implicated as having a direct role in helping out, no one would believe it.  The saying goes if you tell a lie enough then it becomes the truth.

The people should be fearing the entities that provide them the funding not the terrists.  

Aristotle of Greece's picture
Aristotle of Greece (not verified) yellowsub Jul 21, 2016 10:32 PM

Israel orchestrated it.


So It Goes's picture

Who says the "hijackers" got that money.  It was paid to handlers - end of story.

Billy the Poet's picture

End of story? Is that like saying, "the science is settled?'

What did the handlers handle if not the hijackers? Inquiring minds not limited by stridently declared "litmus tests" want to know.

Tall Tom's picture

Seems like lots of cash was funneled to the hijackers. If they weren't a key element why the funding?





Patsies. They were the patsies.


The Towers were destroyed in a Controlled Demolition.


Every good swindle or plot uses a fall guy, or fall guys, upon who to place blame. They were key to seeing the plot through to the fruition.


(They could not even fly Cessnas. Come on...)

moneybots's picture

"The Towers were destroyed in a Controlled Demolition."


No, the fires were completely out of control, resulting in a catastrophic failure of the structural steel.

blindman's picture

911 was a day of complete control made to look
like a day of complete chaos. i think that
is the numerological meaning of 911.
allegedly 4 planes were destroyed on that day,
and on land,
in 2001 and there are no plane parts to show
for it. none that can be conclusively tied to the
alleged missing planes. that right there is highly unusual
in itself, oh so curious.

Kobe Beef's picture

I've come to see 3 black ops running in parallel:

1) the Saudis running a typically Arab plane hijacking/suicide maneuver

2) the Israelis running a practically patented Jewish Lightning maneuver, rigging the towers to collapse

3) the Americans/(((neocons))) running a typically American False Flag Casus Belli (The Maine, the Lusitania, Tonkin Gulf, etc) shooting a missile at the Pentagon, mailing Anthrax, and generating their "New Pearl Harbor" event.

To what degree were they coordinating or co-opting each other, I don't know. It is only the scale of 9/11 that makes it astounding, because the behavior of Arabs, Jews, and Americans above is just plain typical.

Thanks to all the 9/11 researchers, condolences to the victims families, and..


cheka's picture

duals = the third leg...that nyc media dares not mention and will defend with no limits

SgtShaftoe's picture

Those were air force aircraft wired to be drones by Americans.  Those aircraft in NYC exceeded the flight capabilities of the named aircraft at sea level.  Who murdered the people on the real planes though if there were any, the two, possibly 3 including pentagon?  The third is on local boston News (youtube) as landing and passengers getting off at a NASA hangar at Logan. 

Kobe Beef's picture

After watching the John Lear video describing the flight trajectories of the planes on 9/11 versus the flight envelopes of Boeing passenger jets, I agree.

And the flight termination system points directly to (((Dov Zakheim))), cohencidentally Comptroller of the Pentagon.


Katos's picture

Why do you think the dweeb, Jeb bailed so quickly after spending 128 million dollars in the initial weeks of the primaries? When Trump started talking about Dumbya, and how he was complicit in the 911 attacks, I'm sure BIG daddy Bush saw the writing on the wall that he could be caught. So he yanked Jeb out to save the family. 

cn13's picture

Jeb spent $100 million on an election while receiving just 3 delegates.

How pathetic is that?

OpTwoMistic's picture

For your consideration:

Marvin Pierce Bush

Born in 1956, Marvin is a venture capitalist and until 2000 he served on the board of directors for Securacom, a company that maintained security for the World Trade Center Towers.


junction's picture

Nobody in power in the United States will go after the Brush crime family.  AG Lynch has more important matters to deal with.  The Kickass Torrents website operator just got arrested in Poland by U.S. authorities for operating his illegal bittorrent site, kat.cr.  I had tried to go to the site to see if they had a Blu-ray torrent there of one of my favorite movies, 1974's "The Parallax View."  So, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), which protects arch-criminal Hillary Clinton (who, by co-ordering the murder of Gaddafi, unleashed the hordes of illegals flooding Europe, a NWO destabilizing goal), spends who knows how much time and money to protect the intellectual property rightsof Hollywood studios' comic book movies.  9/11 is ignored and Wall Street banksters and insiders loot the world of hundred of trillions of dollars through the use of tranches of fraudulent derivatives.  Nothing is done by the DOJ's corrupt empty suits.  The Sinaloa drug cartel works with impunity in the United States (protected by the DEA), defrocked pedophile priests work as TSA airport screeners and potential witnesses with information on the 9/11 attack were murdered before they could testify.  Silence from the Obama and Bush administrations.    

But then, Alan Pakula's death was not investigated, just your typical accident on the Long Island Expressway in 1998, a pipe goes flying through his car window as he is driving, killing him instantly.  How many times has that happened before?  About as often as what happened to Katherine Smith, who was murdered and then put in a car that burst into flames while driving down a Memphis highway.


Katherine Smith sold IDs to five of the hijackers(1)  was "smothered with gasoline and "firebombed" in her car one day before she was scheduled to testify. Source: Kansas City Star, 02/16/02 

FBI agent J. Suzanne Nash said authorities were trying to determine what caused the car to burn. The gas tank did not explode and the car was only slightly dented from the crash. "Her death was not the result of the crash itself," said THP Capt. Jimmy Erwin. "Her death was by other means." (March 6th 2002) Source : http://www.gomemphis.com/mca/local_news/article/0,1426,MCA_437_1016243,00.html 

As investigative journalist Wayne Madsen (->) reported in an article at counterpunch, Katherine Smith mysterious death was examined at the same institute who examined Don C Wiley (->), the MicroBiologist, who died under strange circumstances in 2001.
(Source: http://www.counterpunch.org/madsenanthrax.html



beemasters's picture

Michael Ruppert...RIP. Thank you.
It's painful to think what he must have gone through to have ended his own life....all after giving so much.

Nassim's picture

The fact that the 9/11 was a false-flag has now become mainstream - except in the mainstream media. It is amazing how they keep on pretending that the official report is gospel.

Future Jim's picture

That's funny ... the 28 pages don't seem to address the 9/11 conspiracy ...



9/11 Conspiracy

Each paragraph is a synopsis of a link that provides compelling evidence of conspiracy in the cause and/or cover up of 9/11. Although this list should be more than sufficient to convince any independent minded person of conspiracy, consider that this is just a fraction of the compelling evidence. Also consider that the entire mainstream media has conspired to ignore all of this compelling evidence.

9/11 Summary by James Corbett – In this five minute video, James Corbett makes a pretty comprehensive, compelling, and entertaining argument packed with facts and supporting evidence making it pretty obvious that the official story on 9/11 is ludicrous and that powerful motives existed for an inside job.

WTC7 – The best single issue to start with is the little known fact that a third tower fell on 9/11 and the self-evident fact that it was a controlled demolition; whereas, the official story that came out several years later was that, what looked exactly like a controlled demolition, and which had been previously admitted [1] [2] [3] to have been a controlled demolition, was putatively the result of an ordinary office fire. Watch the videos here, and see for yourself that the official story cannot be true and can only be an intentional fabrication.

Flight 93 Debris Pattern – Multiple facts confirm that Flight 93 in Pennsylvania broke up in the air as if it had been shot down, which contradicts the official story, and the single most compelling of these facts is the debris pattern. The official story is that terrorists flew Flight 93 straight down into the soft ground of a land fill where it was instantly and entirely submerged with not one scrap of debris visible anywhere around the site and leaving only a modest gouge in the dirt. As ludicrous as the submersion of the flight sounds, we don’t need to debunk it directly to disprove the official story because the official story disproves itself by admitting that an engine was found one-half mile to the right of the crash and two more debris fields were discovered along the original horizontal flight path about three miles and nine miles away! The official story is that the debris had bounced to their final locations!

Molten Steel Proven but Denied - This video proves that molten steel at the site for 6 weeks following 9/11 existed and was well documented, and that NIST Lead Engineer, John Gross, denied the existence of molten steel at the site when asked about it by a citizen. Consider also that molten steel would have been compelling evidence of the use of thermite, which would have contradicted the official story.

Bill Cooper Predicted 9/11 – This video proves that as of 6/28/01, Osama had been working with the CIA all along, and how anti-government extremist, Bill Cooper, predicted that same day that a major attack would be perpetrated a few weeks later by the “New World Order” and be blamed on Osama Bin Laden. It also explains how he was ambushed and killed by police on 11/5/2001. Shortly before that, Bill Cooper had said that the same NWO forces that perpetrated 9/11 were hoping to perpetrate a false flag some day in the form of an alien attack, which sounds pretty far fetched until you consider that he was right about the 9/11 false flag …


Vatican_cameo's picture

Flight 93 never existed.  They blasted a trench into the ground and told the reporters that the plane disintegrated.  They recovered a Fight Attendant I.D., a hotel reservation slip and a red bandana.  There was no jet fuel residue found at the scene.  There were a few small pieces that were some distance away and those pictures were fed to the media.  Planted material in the woods, that's all.  You're looking at an aircraft that seats 256 people, has a wingspan of almost 200 ft. and a tail that's 77 ft. tall.  They can account for maybe 5% of that aircraft.  The rest of it certainly didn't "Vaporize".  It was never there to begin with. 

Dormouse's picture

Project Blue Beam is some sort of laser light show in the sky designed to unite all of mankind against an extraterrestrial foe. Everyone is supposed to come together under a common language and a world religion based on science; I hope that doesn't mean Scientology because L. Ron, Crowley, and Jack Parsons were creepy occultists. This is an alternative global take over plan to the ideas expressed in the Iron Mountain Report that identifies the environment as the existential threat to humanity.

StychoKiller's picture

"The Architects of Fear" -- Outer Limits

moneybots's picture

"WTC7 – The best single issue to start with is the little known fact that a third tower fell on 9/11 and the self-evident fact that it was a controlled demolition"


It is self evident that there was a totally out of control fire in WTC7.

roadhazard's picture

LOL, so Osama got to sit there for ten years watching no planes fly into the towers thinking he caused that.

bugs_'s picture

The main problem is the VERIFICATION of the FBI information contained in the 28 pages - something the joint inquiry clearly states they did not do.

We need to stop having inquiries and commissions that do not independently verify the information that is presented to them on a silver platter.

Billy the Poet's picture

We still don't know if bacon is safe to eat.

Arnold's picture

Most emails are unrecoverable.

Even the CC and Bcc.

Billy the Poet's picture

All you've got to do is wipe your server with a cloth and then have your husband accidentally run into the Attorney General at some obscure airfield.

Farmer Joe in Brooklyn's picture

The Obama administration knew all this from the go and they never released it, but kept it buried.

Why is that? O's administration would have loved the chance to further bury that scumbag GW. But they didn't.

Goes to show who's calling the shots...the neocons and the deep state war party. 

Barney Fife's picture

Two-party idiots cite that as "evidence" that 911 was not an inside job, buy rationalizing that if Bush pulled off a false-flag then Obama would have spilled the beans. 

Three logical explanations can account for this:

The more likely one is: The two-party charade cooperated at the highest levels of each party and conspired to keep the operation secret as part of a mutual 20 year plan to convert the US into a police state, conquer certain energy rich nations, and fold all of it into an evolving globalist government. 


Obama and others knew about it and were told in no uncertain terms that JFK had a big mouth also, 


Obama and others figured it out but knew that if it got out there could possibly be a revolution and they'd have no government to govern. 


Dormouse's picture

"We got him!"

Even though he probably died in the caves as far back as 2002. Then we promptly wrapped his body in 800 thread count Egyptian cotton and dumped him in the Indian Ocean ...in accordance with Islamic tradition! The only evidence that someone killed the boogeyman was a poorly photoshopped picture. Seal Team 6 sacrificed or murdered in Chinooks by commanders several months later.

Trogdor's picture

Zeusse is not a jornalist - he's a propagandist and Zionist shill.  Interesting (but not at all surprising) that Zuesse (a hard-core Zionist Jew) would try to shift blame for 9/11 to the Bush's and the Saudis.  While I have no doubt they were involved, they did not mastermind nor orchestrate 9/11 - they were along for the ride.   They (Bush/Saudis) didn't have control of the critical infrastructure to pull off 9/11.  Only the Israelis and their agents had control over all the critical pieces that led up to the attack - and more importantly - the means to cover it up - i.e. virtually total domination of the MSM, as well as agents inside government agencies tasked with the investigation.  As people wise up to this fact, they're frantically trying to offload blame to their patsies.

o r c k's picture

And the fact that treason,grand theft on Wall St. and crimes against humanity are no longer crimes. Why? Because Baby Bush and Obombyou say so.

samsara's picture

Back a few days ago on the other article on the 28 pages I said;


It Is A Smoking Gun - Prince Bandar And Other Saudis Financed The 9/11 Terrorists


samsara Jul 18, 2016 8:49 PM

Is that Prince Bandar Bush? You mean the family that was allowed to fly out of the country in their own aircraft, on 911 when No Other jets were allowed to fly much less make a run for home??


That Prince Bandar?



Bill of Rights's picture

Ok great good read, now what are all the Captain Commando arm chair warriors gonna do about it?

Nothing thats what..IE "WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE "

Trogdor's picture

It does make a difference - just the awareness does significant damage to the credibility of the PTB in the minds of people who might have been on the fence.  You don't wake people up all at once - unless you want them pissed off at you.  You wake them up a little at a time ... with little pieces of information, little insights ... the same way that they were lulled into unconsciousness in the first place.  For someone like Glenn Beck who practially spoo'ed all over himself when he met with Bush - and then went on to robotically support the official myth of 9/11, this must be a "revelation" (not that I respect Beck - he's a borderline traitor in my book).  One of my neighbors was pretty distraught when he realized that the Bush/Saudi connection wasn't a "conspiracy theory" any more...

Tall Tom's picture





One of your neighbors was pretty distraught? Awwwwwwwww...


I'd smear his face in it. Make him feel so uncomfortable and let him know that he was COMPLICIT.


I want them pissed off at me. I want them to totally hate my guts. I have a fucking skin. I really do not give a fuck about what MORONIC TOOLS feel about me. Then, as they are just TRANSFERING their anger and rage upon me, smear that bastard more, and turn it to those who are RESPONSIBLE.




No. I am not seeking friends....especially with the likes of those people. They are the enemy. They are still in the Matrix. ANYBODY who is still in the Matrix IS THE ENEMY.  Remember Morpheus' words, his WARNING, as that will serve you well.


Rude Awakenings are the best. They bring the best results.


Fuck them. Kick their Mentally Lazy ass out of bed.

ISawThatToo's picture
ISawThatToo (not verified) Jul 21, 2016 8:54 PM

Banbait #471

Yup, and the Saudis were also with Oswald in the 6th. Floor Book Depository window.

They sure as hell weren't across the river dancing with the Mossad.

samsara's picture

How about this family relationship/partnership   

The Carlyle Group, integrated by the Bush and bin Laden families awarded a billion dollar contract to "rebuild" Iraq:

And isn't funny,  another family friend and business partner of G. Bush Sr.  was the John Hinckley Sr. family... 

Ya Neil Bush & wife were having Scott Hinckley over for dinner the night before Scott's brother was scheduled to "assassination" of Reagan.




TuPhat's picture

I think we should call Ghostbusters on this one but then we would only get a bunch of girls so what's the use.

Barney Fife's picture

Gee, how come the Johnny-come-lately to ZH Trump fluffers don't want to join in this thread? 

Know why? Because they believe in the 19 Cavemen Pulled It Off All by Themselves Because They Hate Our Freedoms theory, that's why.