The Social Justice Cult Should Blame Itself For The Rise Of Trump

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Brandon Smith via,

I have not been writing much concerning the U.S. election this November, and with good reason - elections are always a distraction from tangible solutions.  They are an anathema to honest debate; a circus of delusions and prefabricated talking points.  They offer the illusion of choice in order to placate the masses.  They are a theater of false hopes.

That said, elections do accomplish one thing very well — they are great for mobilizing large numbers of people into opposing camps and pitting them against each other over ideologies and political celebrities.  Sometimes, these elections can lead to internal war.  This is where we stand in 2016.

In my article Will A Trump Presidency Really Change Anything For The Better, published in March, I outlined why I believed that the election of 2016 would revolve around a Trump vs. Hillary free-for-all.  The two sides are perfectly diametrically opposed.  At least, as far as public image is concerned, one is the exact antithesis to the other, and I don’t think this is a coincidence.

Over the course of the past century social instability and outright internal conflicts have in most cases been the product of a specific catalyst — namely various flavors of Marxism and communism.  That is to say, communists attempt to socially or economically sabotage conservative or free market based systems with civil unrest and political chicanery, and in response, nations are either overrun by color revolution or they swing to the other side of the collectivist spectrum and resort to fascism.

This is often by design.  As I have examined in detail in numerous articles in the past, it is the financial elite that tend to play BOTH sides of this modern battle between the communists and the “nationalists,” usually promoting or supporting groups with communist leanings, radicalizing them and exploiting them to drive normally level headed conservatives to respond with anger and totalitarianism to keep them at bay.  Of course, these totalitarian regimes also end up under the control of the establishment.  It is the best way to hijack and co-opt a conservative population.

Today, we have a similarly pervasive communism in the West funded by the same kinds of elites, only in the form of a more frantic style of cultural Marxism.  One need only examine the cash infusions by billionaires like George Soros and his Open Society Institute into Black Lives Matter as well as other “social justice” organizations.

Under the guise of philanthropy, global financiers exploit mindless followers and the entitlement mob like a heavy bludgeon, swinging them wildly at any cultural mainstay that represents the bedrock of the target nation.  Apparently, the irony is completely lost on the social justice warriors, who completely ignore the fact that rich white guys are bankrolling their battle against… rich white guys.

It is important to note that while the financial establishment is the very CORE of the problem and the primary instigator and manipulator of the public psyche (they have this down to a science), their success in these endeavors would not be as frequent without so many mindless followers and academic idiots to perpetuate the momentum of chaos.  These groups share almost as much blame as the elites in the destruction of civility and prosperity.

In this age of unstable economies and societies, there are many people who are desperate to be told what to do rather than lead themselves.  However, none are quite as horrifying as the social justice cultists.

These people are, in my view, nearly the pinnacle of the communist ideal.  They are die hard collectivists, and are willing to rationalize almost any action as long as they believe it is being done in the name of the “greater good.”  Usually, this greater good is based on entirely arbitrary determinations rather than any inherent moral code, making it vaporous and easily changeable.  A “greater good” without principles based in inherent conscience or natural law can be shifted on a whim to suit any evil imaginable.

They believe fervently in the purity of their world view.  Most of them are not open to even the slightest question or concern over their ethos.  Their blind faith is unshakeable, even in the face of extensive empirical evidence and superior logic.  Such people are the ultimate cannon fodder for the elites.

Social justice cultists act on the assumption that history is on their side, and that they will one day be seen as heroes for their deeds.

They not only seek to promote and spread their ideology — this would merely make them a new form of religion.  No, they are not just evangelists, they also want their own version of a caliphate; an all dominating cult that crushes any embers of dissent and destroys its philosophical opponents trapped within its ever expanding borders.

A recent and starling example of this mentality can be found in the following video of a BBC show called “The Big Questions.”  The subject of the debate — “Does social media reveal men’s hatred for women?”  Milo Yiannopoulos faces off with a crowd of mouth breathing true-believers and barely gets a word in edgewise as they do what cultural Marxists do best:  use the mob to shout down their opponent and attack the person’s character rather than confront his arguments and evidence:

Though this show is produced out of the U.K. and not the U.S., I am using it to shed light on the inevitable end game of all social justice cultists regardless of where they live — to dominate all discussion and erase conservative thought from society.  The attitudes displayed by the feminists and the rather pathetic members of the audience are truly frightening. Not only do they argue that Yiannoupoulos has no right to even be dignified  with time to respond, they are at bottom also claiming the right to assert force of law to ban ideas they disagree with and even to imprison the people that argue those ideas.

Instead of simply ignoring or blocking the people who offend them like rational adults, or participating in a free exchange, they want the power of government to silence opposition. If their ideas were truly superior in merit then they would have no need to use force to silence or imprison their opponents.  They want to turn the whole of the web, the whole of the WORLD, into a federally enforced “safe space” for their ideology and their ideology alone.

It is this kind of zealotry that leads to outright totalitarianism and collectivism. This is the kind of evil that is done in the name of the so-called “greater good.”

The fact is, their feelings are irrelevant. They do not matter.  Most rational people don’t care if SJWs are offended, or afraid or disgusted and indignant. Their problems are not our problems.  Our right to free expression and freedom of association is far more important than their personal feelings or misgivings.  We do not owe them a safe space.  If they want a safe space, then they should hide in their hovels or crawl back to the rancid swamps from whence they slithered.

A backlash is building against the social justice cult that will be unleashed sooner rather than later, and so far it is accelerating at the height of the election frenzy under the banner of Donald Trump.

Social justice warriors seem to find themselves befuddled at the rise of Trump, but as I predicted in March, a Trump vs. Hillary face-off was inevitable.

For conservatives, Hillary is the ultimate representation of political hell spawn.  She is a proven elitist puppet, with a criminal record that reads like a transcript from the Nuremberg trials.  She is also a part of an ongoing trend of dynasties in U.S. politics.  Americans have grown tired of the Bushes and the Clintons.  We have grown tired of the endless reign of neo-cons and neo-liberals.  We are looking something different, or what we hope is something different.  Trump at first glance at least looks like a candidate outside of the establishment norm.

Beyond this increasing aversion to the status quo, though, is the growing American contempt for the social justice cult.  This will be a primary driver of the U.S. election.

While many in the cult had thrown their support behind Bernie Sanders for a time, Bernie showed his true colors by bowing down to the Clinton machine.  This is typical of socialists, who regularly forgo their proclaimed principles in the name of “unity” and “victory” under a single collectivist umbrella.  Many in the social justice crowd have quickly jumped on Hillary’s bandwagon, as her campaign now rides solely on the disposition of her own sexual organs.

That is to say, Clinton is now the new mascot for the SJW crowd, even though many of them don't really like her.

I’m not so sure the “vote for me because I’m a woman” theme is going to go over quite as effectively as Obama’s “vote for me because I’m black” theme.  The Hillary campaign symbol, looking strangely like a warped version of the arrowed symbol for “Male” and Mars, is emblazoned on worshipful feminist posters and cartoons everywhere.  A nice touch was the cringe-worthy display of Clinton’s giant head on the DNC mega-screen bashing through photos of past male presidents as if “shattering” the proverbial glass ceiling.  Set aside the fact that over half of American voters are women, and that there is no glass ceiling preventing women from being voted into office by other women if being a woman rather than a decent candidate was all that mattered.

The theater of the feminist absurd aside, this election is going to tumble about wildly on all sorts of carnival sideshows.

The so called “controversy” over comments made by Trump against the parents of a Muslim soldier killed in U.S. service in Iraq is just the beginning of the circus.  To be fair to Trump, the sheer hypocrisy of Hillary Clinton, a warmonger of the highest degree and a participant by-proxy in the death of the soldier in question, using his parents as fuel for a campaign controversy goes so far into the realm of the disturbing that I might be shocked if I didn’t understand that the whole thing is a mind game.  These kinds of distractions are meant to fuel the flames and I predict they will become frequent and overwhelming by November.

To reiterate, it is clear that the Clinton campaign is going the route of pandering to the SJWs.  This is the script, and I as I said after the Brexit referendum vote, I believe that the script ends with a Clinton failure and a Trump victory.  Pandering to SJWs rarely leads to success.  And, a faltering economy blamed on Trump would be far preferable to one blamed on Clinton.

My regular readers know well that I personally do not have much faith in the Trump campaign; I’ve seen too many constitutional inconsistencies and too many meetings with elitist representatives so far to give him the benefit of the doubt.  If he turns out to be a true constitutionalist, then I will be pleasantly surprised and happy to admit I was wrong.

That said, I do understand why the public is rallying around Trump.  They see him not as a candidate, but as a vehicle to push forward a fight against a social justice juggernaut that has gone unanswered for far too long.  They don’t much care about him as a man, which is why the character attacks by the social justice cult and the media have fallen flat again and again.  They only care that he might not be the status quo.  They are looking for something radical to counter the radicalism of cultural Marxists.

I am not here to argue over which candidate is “better,” or preferable or the “lesser of evils.”  None of this matters.  I realize that I am not going to convince anyone to vote in anyway different than how they have already decided to vote.  In fact, I am certain that most people decided exactly how they were going to vote as soon as the candidates were publicly finalized.

The zealotry will be evident on both sides.  Democrats will accuse me of being biased in favor of Trump because I outline in articles the endless parade of horrors surrounding Clinton's career.  Republicans will accuse me of "secretly working for the Democrats" because I refuse to throw full blind faith behind Trump.  That's just how elections work - follow my mascot or you are my enemy.

I really couldn't care less.  I'm on the side of liberty and individualism and I'll fight on this side alone if I have to.

I will say that I KNOW exactly what will happen under Hillary Clinton - despotism in the name of "equality", leading to outright civil war.  I only SUSPECT according to what I have seen so far that Trump is not a constitutional candidate.

The danger is that in our search for the counterbalance to social justice despotism and Hillary Clinton's evident communist addictions, we conservatives will fall into the old historical paradigm of fascism in the name of defeating communism, helping the elites instead of dethroning them.  The danger is that we get so caught up in trying to destroy the social justice mob that we forget our principles.

If a President Trump shows any indications of being anti-constitution, even in the name of our own “greater good,” conservatives MUST stand by our ideals and stand against him, or we become no better than the SJW psychopaths we seek to stop.  No man, no woman, no president is more important than the liberties and heritage of this nation and its citizenry.

As far as social justice activists are concerned, if they really want to change this country for the better, then they should consider dropping out of their little cult and finding something productive to do.  Stop spending your parents’ money on garbage gender studies classes.  Become scientists and engineers.  Become doctors and inventors. Create a better planet through ingenuity rather than manic ideology.  Make yourselves useful or something.  You're not only wasting your own time wreaking havoc with your collectivism, you are also wasting our time, because now we have to spend it working to stop you and the elites that fund you.

Become self sufficient instead of begging for handouts or feeding off your family and their savings accounts.  Add to the world instead of bleeding it dry.  Help people through personal action instead of trying to micro-manage their lives and their speech and their thoughts through force of government.

Otherwise, all you are is more gasoline on a fire that will result in inevitable conflict; a conflict which you will lose.  A conflict which may only serve the interests of the very elites which you think you are fighting against.  Remember, whatever happens, it was the social justice cult that helped to create the conditions by which such a conflict became unavoidable.  Without the cultural Marxists, there would be no rationale for any division.  If they would simply leave us all alone to think and say what we feel, to choose our associations without interference or invasive conquest of “spaces” and to live in a functioning society based on merit rather than victimhood and artificial fear, there would be no fertile ground for an election circus of this magnitude.

And finally, if EVERYONE relied less on political celebrities, if everyone stopped waiting for a knight on a white horse, or a feminist icon, or a crusade to fight, or a social justice mob to join and started determining their own futures; if everyone began looking far more carefully at the people behind the curtain, then perhaps we could finally see a change in humanity not seen in thousands of years.  Not a collectivist change, but an individualist change, which is the only kind of change everlasting or worth a damn.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Never One Roach's picture

Your article reminds me of the racists/vicious backlash this young female student in Texas got after simply saying, "All lives matter."


UH student body VP under fire for 'All Lives Matter' gets punished by peers

The vice president of the Student Government Association at the University of Houston has been punished by her student senate after she posted on Facebook: "Forget #BlackLivesMatter; more like #AllLivesMatter."

Student body vice president Rohini Sethi has been suspended by the SGA and is temporarily barred from participating in group activities. She is also due to attend a “diversity” workshop per the ruling.

She must also attend three cultural events per month, write a reflection letter, and make a public presentation to a senate meeting on Sept. 28, according to KTRK-TV.

Aristotle of Greece's picture
Aristotle of Greece (not verified) Never One Roach Aug 3, 2016 10:00 PM

I "love" it when these "pundits" mention the "elite" or "global financiers". So who are they? This elusive "elite" or these "global financiers"?

wee-weed up's picture



The Social Justice Cult is all about creating more "PC victims"...  a key plank of the DNC & Hitlery's campaign.

They figure the more artificial victims they can create - the more votes they will get.

Let's hope the anti-PC Trump will put an end to this!

NidStyles's picture

SJW = Communists

Trump = Modern Fascist


It's sort of a no brainer. Fascism is the cultural reaction to communist infiltration in non-Asian countries. The only long term communist style government have all been Asian and Asian mixed lands.


Communism is an Asian cultural identity. Fascism is a Caucasion cultural identity. This is what they are talking about when the leftists and commies whine about European people playing identity politics. They are complaining about the trend for Europeans to unite and militarize when they are threatened by an out-group.We tend to regrab out traditional identities that we have so often attempted to leave behind to live in peace with people whom are apparently incapable of doing so.


Trump was inevitable the more they pushed to get their way. It was either going to be Trump, or someone more radical and violent. It was going to happened no matter what, and it happens everytime. This is why the Tribe hates us so much, we are naturally resistant to their dominance, where is every other racial group is heavily Asian mixed and thus more susceptible to their agenda.

Manthong's picture

“[Trump’s] onto something, because secretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up,” he said. “We’re really in a pussy generation.”



NidStyles's picture

Something that the older generations don't seem to understand. It's not actually about racism, or opression, or feelings. This is the face of Communism. This is the same shit that was going on in the Soviet Union.

NoDebt's picture

The Republican Party is at fault for the "Rise of Trump".  If they had actually done JACK SHIT when they got installed in 2010/2014 maybe people wouldn't have resorted to Trump in 2016 but.... nope.  

Trump tried his shit in 2008 and... failed miserably.  Flash forward 8 years and suddenly he's the RNC nominee by a landslide.  Why?  Did Trump suddenly become a different guy in 8 years?  Unlikely.  The COUNTRY CHANGED.  

They are SICK OF THIS SHIT.  And they're ready for Trump because they've tried everything else up to this point but nobody listened to them.  Reap the whirlwind, motherfuckers.


tmosley's picture

I'm afraid the SJWs are pathalogically incapable of accepting responsibility for anything. It is their defining characteristic.

jeff montanye's picture

here's how we get brought to heel: mossad sends, probably from inside the studio, a suitably muslimish individual into a clinton trump debate and blows all three of them up.  kind of a mini 9-11 for the elite.  takes the stuffing out of the ignorant masses on both sides, because now it's pence versus kaine and who cares or can tell the difference?  

for those farther up the food chain it's a warning not to think, for a moment, that they count.

and the wars go on.

froze25's picture

Self responsibility is not in there DNA, it would go against the victim mentality they push. Once someone figures out they are responsible for there place in life,they can do something about it and are no longer a victim but now a empowered individual. The enemy of the Victim collectivist.  Trump 2016, he screams self accountability. 

vulcanraven's picture

Confucius say....

Man in corner with hand in pants, not feeling "mad", feeling "nuts" 

Doom Porn Star's picture

"And they're ready for Trump because they've tried everything else up to this point but nobody listened to them.  Reap the whirlwind, motherfuckers. "


Trump is to politics what the Stay Puff Marshmellow Man was to Ghostbusters: the Form of the Destroyer.

Since the two party duopoly has made it impossible for the citizenry to restrain the Oligarchy and attendant beauracracy which have both become wildly impudent and rapacious a blint instrument is required to unseat the parasites.

IF the 'political process' worked there would simply be no demand fro Trump; but, the process is FUBAR -and thus destruction and dismantlement of the Oligarchy can only be attempted through brute force: thus the unsubtle candidate is the favorite...

jeff montanye's picture

trump's opponents did 9-11.  his vice-president is mike pence.  

scalia probably thought they were his friends.

MalteseFalcon's picture

"I'm on the side of liberty and individualism and I'll fight on this side alone if I have to."


Aren't we all?

You're the reason we're in this mess.

The SJWs took advantage of your passivity, particularly in the 60s and 70s, and rolled the nation up.

So stand aside and shut the fuck up while we do the work that is long overdue.

The necessary work that you do not have the stomach for.

As I tell all my libertarian friends: you can't get there from here by being a libertarian.

Trogdor's picture

This is the face of Communism.

Absolutely.  I have some very good friends who escaped from Czechoslovakia when it was taken over by the Communists - literally with the shirts on their backs.  My friends rail against this Cultural Marxism and these flaming idiots.  "I didn't risk my life and my families' life escaping Communism to come to America and watch it happen here!" he shouts ... but most Americans are pretty goddam stupid.

Shift For Brains's picture

Take a look at the Cultural Revolution in China, when the radicalized students basically were the shock troops for this type of "cultural purification."

Then take a look at today's SJW set. It's the exact same fucking tactics and zealotry. The only difference is they have round eyes.

Lea's picture

It is something that the older generation, who at least had an idea about what the Soviet Union, can't understand because it's not true.

The Soviet Union was not anti-racist (it was all-inclusive, which is the opposite. Get it? You do not divide along racial lines, you unify everyone under the same banner), the Soviet Union was not feminist (feminism holds women are somehow better, something that the communists denied vigorously. To them, men and women were equal, nuff said, don't make it into a cause or a public nuisance). Also, the Soviet Union was against sexual freedoms. You got married, raised your children and worked, and that was it.

You yet haven't understood the first word about the Cold War propaganda they eat your brains with, have you? People like you are so easy to play it'd be a shame not to go ahead.

Bill Brasky's picture

The cultural Marxism is just a strategy of destablization against the west-- it is a means, not an end. Most of what the Frankfurt school, and later acolytes, developed was done after the communists had achieved victory in Russia and formed the Soviet Union. The methods used today are just more sophisticated than it's earlier incarnations.

Ignatius's picture

Of course, many of these SJW'rs are just idiots, but how many of them understand that MLK, for instance, was found to have been assassinated by a conspiracy that included government agencies?  Dr. William Pepper won a lawsuit with that finding on behalf of the King family in Memphis in 1999.  "White people" didn't do it, a faction of our rulers did it.  And the media, owned by our rulers, ignored it.  Most of this 'social justice warrior' horseshit is drummed up by our rulers to break cohesion and keep us divided so our anger will be directed at one another rather than the .01% fucktards that off-shore our work and bail out the criminal banksters.

MalteseFalcon's picture

SJWs are idiots and children and understand nothing but their own cant. 

They cannot be re-educated.

Victor von Doom's picture

Agreed. Idiocy coupled with blind faith in utopias. Simple, destructive, nihilistic, tantrum throwing children.

Every fucking last one of them.

Slavery's too good for them. Deport them with the barbarians. Fuck 'em, let them make their damned "workers paradise" in barbarian hell.

It's what they actually deserve.

Chris Dakota's picture
Chris Dakota (not verified) NidStyles Aug 3, 2016 11:07 PM

Hillary's campaign symbol is the 911 attack on the twin towers.

You know she and her people saw that, wonder why they chose it.

hxc's picture

I was thinking the exact same thing the other day, then mentally reprimanded myself for being too paranoid. Which is saying something since I never think that I'm being too paranoid.

JRobby's picture

Hide in plain sight

Barney Fife's picture

Ain't that the truth. 

If you know anything about Hillary's religion then you know that they beleive that they derive power from advertising their deeds. 

wisehiney's picture

I guess everyone forgot...."Sticks and stones can break my bones, but words will never hurt me!"

Ms No's picture

She wasn't the only one.  Martin Luther King's daughter made statements right off the bat saying that something seemed off about the BLMs message, that it was divisionary and that "all lives matter".  I haven't heard much from her since but that maybe because she knows who is behind the movement and doesn't want to end up like her father.  She must be more sophisticated than the average BLM zealot.

JRobby's picture

The "peers" then go home and consume corporate owned processed GMO food and watch corporate owned media.

All is well in the herd!!!

HenryHall's picture

Trump speaks his mind.

Almost all other politicians are mealy-mouthed.

That immediately wins him many supporters.

Beatscape's picture

Clint Eastwood supports Trump.  Here's what he said in an Esquire interview:

SQ: What do you think of Hillary?

CE: What about her? I mean, it's a tough voice to listen to for four years. It could be a tough one. If she's just gonna follow what we've been doing, then I wouldn't be for her.

ESQ: But if the choice is between her and Trump, what do you do?

CE: That's a tough one, isn't it? I'd have to go for Trump … you know, 'cause she's declared that she's gonna follow in Obama's footsteps. There's been just too much funny business on both sides of the aisle. She's made a lot of dough out of being a politician. I gave up dough to be a politician. I'm sure that Ronald Reagan gave up dough to be a politician.


He also blasted what he calls the "Pussy Generation".  A man's man, gotta love Clint.

Never One Roach's picture

In 48 hours she got 160 hate emails/tweets/

Is that unusual? I get at least that from my ex all the time and she's a woman!


'...if President Trump"????????????????????????????????????????????


Arse kisser!

Barney Fife's picture

I just waded through this cesspool of mindless junk , banal tripe, and douchy cliched soundbites and it dawned on me quite quickly that almost none of them here MOI learned a goddamned thing from this article. Not one fucking takeaway. It's like I could put 2 inches of a Makita drill bit through their cerebrums and it wouldn't faze them one bit. 

Tell me. Are they actually typing this stuff? Because here is the paradox. What I have been reading is more like what I would expect out of the slurred words of some special needs retard that can't even hold a spoon in his mouth.

These guys, almost all of them - forgive me the intelligent posters, you know who you are - are shamelessly mind-controlled and brainwashed.

To the Tards on this Board:

Not a goddamn thing that Brandon was trying to elighten you guys on registered. Not one. 

Holy fuck, you're stupider than I thought. 

TradingIsLifeBrah's picture
TradingIsLifeBrah (not verified) Aug 3, 2016 9:59 PM

Media is going all out to destroy Trump, its really sad to see them scramble like this.  Trump will still take it in November

balz's picture

Milo rocks in that clip.

Shift For Brains's picture

Showing the world a man can out-think a feminist...he just can't outshout her.

Lonewar's picture

Just remember that a Vote for Hitlery is a Vote for:


Human Trafficking of Underage Females for Sex

Females staying in abusive relationships

Males cheating on their Wives

Women staying in abusive relationships because of public pressure

Wars of Aggression

Killing YOUR Kids

Selling government favors to the highest bidder (Even if they are International in scope)

Funding Terrorists

Creating Terrorists

Sending YOUR jobs oversees

Inviting illegal aliens in to take those jobs that CANT go oversees


And these are just the PROVEN results of having Bill and Hitlery in office

Have fun in November

snakehead's picture

Jesus H., Tylers.

JUMP OFF ALL BANDWAGONS. Trump is not a victim.  He's a grifter who was born rich.  HRC is proven horrorshow.  We are fuckt by the broken system. 

Stu Elsample's picture

...and Hillary gets more pussy than him

hxc's picture

Yeah, wahhabi faggot pussy. Not sure it's the type normal human males like.


I'd take Melania over a thousand Humas.

Stu Elsample's picture

"social justice"...code for spoiled rotten sniveling black trash giving a good bitch slapping to those bed-wetting self-loathing 'white guilt' preaching liberals who don't have the guts to tell the perpetually angry turds to piss off.

ebworthen's picture

I think "build a wall" and "bring our jobs back" and "restrict Muslim immigration" and "get out of NATO" and "Russia is not our enemy" and "the system is rigged" are pretty straightforward.

On the other hand "It takes a village" is some pretty open-ended delusional fairy dust.

John_Coltrane's picture

A villiage of negroes in Africa, but one or two white parents is more than sufficient as all of Western Civilization has proven.  And even with a villiage, negros couldn't figure out how useful a wheel would be for moving things around.

gonetogalt's picture

If you don't need to move anything heavier than a palm frond...

Teknopagan's picture








It is a clear choice:  Vote Trump 

roddy6667's picture

This Social Justice Warrior movement is so ludicrous, I sometimes wonder if it was created to make a backlash and move the people to a more conservative opinion. Put some crisis actors in high profile positions in the movement where they get lots of media coverage, and you can piss off a lot of people. I find it hard to imagine anybody really believing in this crap. In case of war, there should be a draft and put them on the front lines.

"Hey asshole, you said you were a warrior".

Buster Cherry's picture

My root fear in all this is that Trump might not really want the job of POTUS at all, and may be acting as the agent spoiler to hoodwink the Pepole and assure Satan in the form of Hillary Rod ham gets the nod.

If and when that happens, I hope bloodshed can be avoided somehow.