Globalism Is A Barbaric Relic - Voluntary Tribalism Is The Future

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,

I have been writing rather extensively about the ideology of globalism in recent months, primarily because the battle lines between sovereignty and global centralization have never been more defined than they are in 2016.  In the past, globalists have often hidden the true motives of their cult; namely the goal of erasing national borders and all remaining vestiges of self governance.  Normally, they would only pronounce the great advantages of globalization while dancing around the fact that millions of people will not accept it.  Today, however, the globalists have come out in direct confrontation with supporters of sovereignty.

After the Brexit referendum, a new tone appears to have been set.  The elites have now entered the mainstream media to state in essence that yes, they are globalists, they want total centralization and they are here to fight a philosophical and/or physical battle with those they call “populists” (also known as conservatives and sovereigns).

When they have discussed globalization in previous years, it has always been presented as some kind of natural progression of events rather than an agenda.  The first secret of elitist propaganda is their constant assertion that globalism is “inevitable;” that it is foolish to fight against it because it is the unavoidable future evolution of mankind.  The fact is that if globalism is so inevitable, the elites would not need to expend trillions in capital and decades of energy trying to fool the masses into accepting it.  If globalism is inevitable, couldn’t the elites simply lay back in their pool-side cabanas, sip their dry martinis and just watch it all unfold on its own?

Instead, the elites have foisted globalism upon the shoulders of the public, and are by some indications preparing for outright war in order to force us “populists” into compliance.

The second secret of elitist propaganda is their strategy to disguise centralization as decentralization.  For instance, the new globalist claim is that a shift away from a system in which the dollar is the world reserve currency into a system in which a basket of currencies becomes the world reserve is a move towards a “multi-polar world.”  Nothing could be further from the truth.

In reality, the basket currency system the elites are pushing for falls under the umbrella of the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights.  Meaning a switch away from the dollar into the SDR will result in even MORE centralized power for the elites.  That is not a multi-polar world; it is a uni-polar one.

It is schemes like this that expose the great weakness of globalism as an ideal — the elites cannot accomplish it without using deception and force against innocents.  Such a philosophy is a failure by default.

The third secret of globalist propaganda is that they present the system as if it is a “new” idea. This is yet another lie. Globalism is merely another expanded form of centralization (or collectivism), and centralization has been the prevailing tool of cultural control for ages.  If anything, the freely elected governments and voluntary tribalism of constitutional Republics is the newest and most advanced social concept in all of human history.  Such systems present the potential for lasting decentralization, as long as participants remain vigilant to co-option by globalists.

Sadly, the people of America and the rest of the West have NOT been vigilant for quite some time, and today our experiment in sovereignty is being  twisted, eroded and overrun.

Some seem to find new hope in the rise of conservative activism like the U.K.’s Brexit movement.  As I explained in my pre-referendum article 'Brexit — Global Trigger Event, Fake Out Or Something Else?', these movements are a step in the right direction, but they have a tendency to underestimate the globalist strategy.

I suspect according to the evidence outlined in the article linked above, as well as the behavior of elites ever since the U.K. referendum passed, that a plan is underway to ALLOW conservatives and sovereign activists marginal victories.  Ultimately, in order for the elites to achieve the long-game of total centralization, they need to fully demonize and destroy their philosophical opponents.  That is to say, they need to make conservatives and freedom fighters out to be historical monsters, and themselves out to be the heroes of the day.  The ONLY way for the elites to win is to fool the masses into accepting and even demanding globalization while casting out conservative principles as dangerous or evil.

But how would they make this possible?

It’s simple, really.  They have already set the stage for an international economic and political crisis of epic proportions.  Why not let conservatives and sovereigns take over as captains of an already sinking ship, then blame them when there aren’t enough lifeboats to save the passengers?

Following this line of thinking was how I was able to correctly predict the success of the Brexit vote, it is the reason why I have consistently argued that the Fed will continue to raise interest rates in 2016 despite multiple signs of a recessionary downturn, and why I believe Donald Trump will be the next president.

Once instability has run its course, and once the damage is done and the “populists” are blamed, the elites plan to swoop in with globalism as the fix-all.

The question then arises, if this is the strategy being implemented by the globalists, what can be done about it?

As with most conundrums, the problem is often the source identifier of the solution.  That is to say, if centralization and the elites behind it is the problem, then decentralization and the removal of those elites from power is the most effective solution. If forced globalization is leading to the ruination of man, then voluntary tribalism may be the cure.

The issue actually has more to do with individual psychology than geopolitics.

Human beings have two inherent psychological qualities that can work together, or they can conflict; the need for individual liberty, and the need for community.

We are social creatures.  We can accomplish great feats by working together, but the ideas for these feats are always born in the imaginations of individual minds.  Without the group, the success of the individual can be greatly hindered.  Without individual minds, the success of any group is impossible.

The elites would have us believe that individual success and community success are mutually exclusive; that we cannot have both.  This is simply not true.

Globalists assert that if the individual focuses on his own success, then he cannot focus on the success of the group.  This “conceited” self interest, they claim, will sabotage society as a whole and lead to humanity’s destruction. Therefore, under globalism, the individual must sacrifice his freedom of choice and association; he must sacrifice his right to apply his labors how he wishes, so that the group can supposedly thrive.

I would assert the opposite.  Because all ideological groups are abstractions and not cultural facts, they are completely dependent on the success of the individual in order to thrive.  While the individual may need help from others, he must be allowed to CHOOSE who those people are.  He also must be able to CHOOSE how his ideas and efforts are realized.  Otherwise, the ideas have no steward, no protector.  Under globalism/collectivism, ideas immediately become the property of the group if they are even acknowledged at all, and the group does not think; the group is not capable of thinking.  The group only has merit as long as the individuals within it have merit.  The group is not real.  And so, under the control of a vaporous collective, good ideas usually die.

With globalism as the dominant ideology, individual accomplishment falls and thus, the system itself will eventually fall.

This does not mean that the solution is to end all group interaction or organization so that individuals can go off to to form their own one-man, mini-nation states.  If that is what an individual wishes to do then that is all well and good, but failure is just as likely in that scenario as it would be under globalism.  Instead, the answer may be a return to tribalism, of a voluntary variety.

Our inherent needs for individual freedom as well as community interaction can in fact work together.  The group does not need to supplant the individual to succeed, each member of the group just needs to share the same goals and understand the merits of those goals.

If a person does not understand or respect the goals of that group, then he can easily leave, or refuse to join.  As long as it is unacceptable for any group to use force to compel an individual to participate, then there can be no loss of individual liberty.  Under this model, we could see the rise of numerous tribes, and tribes within tribes.  Some of them fleeting, some of them long lasting.  Of course certain universal truths would have to be respected.

The most common argument against tribalism, whether voluntary or not, is the argument that it will lead to so many conflicting interests that chaos and violence is inevitable.  Wars over resources and property will erupt, some claim, or society will falter into a dog-eat-dog survival of the strongest Mad Max scenario.

First, I would like to point out that globalization and centralization have not solved any of these problems.  Globalism only seems to lead to more efficient war and death, rather than less war and death, and the sides are less defined.  Under the global elites, people are constantly pitted against each other over false narratives and false flags.  We become pawns that are sacrificed to further their objectives.  I hardly see how this is a superior system.  The only wars ever worth fighting are against centralizing tyrants.

 

Second, while tribal conflict is surely possible due to philosophical differences, the promotion of individual freedom, rather than the collective, as the essential element of society makes violent opposition far less likely.

 

Freedom is a universal inborn psychological construct.  Almost all people have a sense of it and its usefulness.  In fact, most fundamental moral principles including freedom are shared by people regardless of their cultural backgrounds.  The only places in which freedom is not respected are places in which centralizing elites have propagandized and threatened the citizenry.  Look at almost any totalitarian system and you will find under scrutiny that globalists helped give birth to these monsters from behind the scenes.  When those elites and their influence are removed for a time, there is usually a natural wellspring resurgence of respect for liberty within that society.

 

Men and women will organize and rally around freedom without being lied to or threatened.  There are not many ideologies that can make the same claim.  Globalism certainly can’t.

 

Third, the next objection from skeptics will be that a handful of controllers under globalism would be preferable to tens of thousands of tyrants lording over thousands of fiefdoms.  Again, these people just don’t seem to grasp the notion of voluntary community or the effectiveness of individual rebellion.

 

I would rather face a thousand minor tyrants with minor armies than a tiny cabal of tyrants with a global army.  The difference being that it is far easier to erase a tyrant with a hundred men in my way than it is to erase a global tyrant with hundreds-of-thousands of men and a massive surveillance apparatus in my way.  In a world where individual liberty is paramount and the people are armed, minor tyrants would be so terrified to pursue power they would likely be dissuaded altogether.  The minimal protection they might muster would never be enough to stop every single bullet flying in their direction.

The idea of voluntary community is so foreign to the public today that it would probably need a catastrophe before such a system is ever adopted.  But, since the global elites have already taken it upon themselves to create the catalysts for an economic and political crisis, we might as well take advantage and rebuild from the ashes with voluntary community in mind.

The elites never let a good crisis go to waste, maybe we should use the same strategy.

This, of course, requires that the liberty minded not only survive the catastrophe, but also fight back and remove the elites from the picture.  There can be no voluntary tribes with the globalists in control of the mechanisms of power.  They are themselves, in effect, a bastardization of a tribe that has been allowed through lack of vigilance to subversively and systematically destroy all other tribes.  They have convinced much of the world through chicanery that their tribe is the ONLY tribe with merit.

The propaganda only works to a point, however.  During any breakdown in normal social order, people invariably create their own social order, and they usually do this by forming small tribes.  Families come together, neighborhoods come together, towns come together and so on, and they do this voluntarily, without being aggressively compelled by others.  The natural default of human beings is freedom and tribalism; two things which do not necessarily have to conflict.  Our natural default has never been to pursue globalism or utter collectivism at the expense of the individual; those kinds of machines are products of the treachery of a power-mad minority.

In the end, globalism is doomed to crash in a ball of flames, but not before the globalists attempt to take everyone else down with them.  It would behoove us to start constructing our tribes now, rather than after the situation has become grim in the absolute.  Through localized production, alternative trade models, local organization for mutual aid and defense, and the principles of liberty, America could become a network of tribes within a tribe; a self reliant system built around redundancy rather than interdependency.

The globalists?  Well, they will try to stop us.  But at least at that point the sides will be drawn more clearly.  I cannot think of a better war to fight than a war to stop the barbaric trespasses of the global elites.  And when it is all over, I look forward to a more complex and “chaotic” society where collectivist streamlining is abandoned for a wild west of voluntary associations.  A land where tribes roam free.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
FinMin's picture

Tausendjähriges Reich!

leanux's picture
leanux (not verified) FinMin Aug 24, 2016 11:19 PM

And who are they? These elusive "globalists"? https://goo.gl/bFYusM

Multi's picture

"Let me publish in my website where I can interact with millions of people ALL OVER THE WORLD that globalism is dead" The irony.

zvzzt's picture

how is that ironic? global reach via internet is not the same as centralized power in any sense. 

Infocat's picture

That is something leftists cant comprehend. http://www.truthjustice.net/

Beowulf55's picture

 

America could become a network of tribes within a tribe; a self reliant system built around redundancy rather than interdependency.

 

NOW YOU ARE TALKING.........been thinking along these lines for years.........

A Nanny Moose's picture

We don't get there until the r-Selective high-time-preference Communists are either dead, or are have been taught that being an r-Selective high-time-preference Communist is a capital offense.

Here2Go's picture
Here2Go (not verified) A Nanny Moose Aug 25, 2016 3:06 AM

With one (((TRIBE))) to rule them all ~ lol

Cloud9.5's picture

That was the original intent under the federal system.  Catholic Maryland could live beside Anglican Virginia with each state writing its own laws that reflected the cultures of each state’s populations. Corporations brought in millions of Eastern Europeans to keep labor prices low and with them they brought an ideology of communalism that was alien to the concepts of individual self-reliance and self-governance. Procrustes became the god of the Progressives.   Cultural Marxism was politicized as the Progressives seized power. The successful individual was demonized.  Local cultures were deemed backward and primitive. The will of the communities was neutered and subjugated to the Progressive national interest.

The mime that mankind could be perfected with enough governmental intervention became the national agenda.  Whole swaths of the population were enticed to become dependent on the largess of the state. Ancient cultural institutions to include the church and patriarchal families became irrelevant.  Benefits could be had simply by birthing a state dependent.  No meaningful inputs to the society were needed or encouraged.  All that was necessary was to grow the size of the dependent population giving rise to bloated byzantine bureaucracies created to service the ever expanding dependent population.

The abject failure of this grand scheme can be found on the streets of every city in America. Tribalism is rampant with totems, and turf wars, and colors, defining the landscape of failed city states.  Legions of inhabitants with no concept of self-reliance embrace these tribes seeking the cultural identity that was lost as the family and churches failed.

 

The country is cleaving into factions.  If those factions are not recognized and allowed to assert their local identities under a resurgence of state and local rights, there will be civil war.  The one size fits all narrative of Procrustes is being shuttled off to the dust bin of history. The only question that remains is will the Progressives go quietly or will the streets run red with blood?

TwoHoot's picture

It will happen, with or without blood in the streets. It is hapening out of necessity. The Global Order is an obvious failure.

At the heart of it is "Who is "US"? Who is "Them"". (Don't dismiss the message just because you don't like the messenger)

Seek_Truth's picture

GLOBALISTS SPEAK:

 

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

 

- David Rockefeller

 

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries"

 

- David Rockefeller, Bilderberg Meeting, June 1991 Baden, Germany

 

"Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."

 

- Woodrow Wilson

 

 

"[The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change it's perceptions."

 

- Henry Kissenger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel , April 19th 1994

 

 

"David Rockefeller is the most conspicuous representative today of the ruling class, a multinational fraternity of men who shape the global economy and manage the flow of its capital. Rockefeller was born to it, and he has made the most of it. But what some critics see as a vast international conspiracy, he considers a circumstance of life and just another day's work... In the world of David Rockefeller it's hard to tell where business ends and politics begins"

 

- Bill Moyers

 

 

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

 

- Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg

 

 

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes."

 

- Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court.

 

 

"The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind. It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism, Socialism. All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government ..."

 

- AMERICAN MERCURY MAGAZINE, December 1957, pg. 92.

 

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson."

- U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov. 21, 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House

 

“If congress has the right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations.”

- Andrew Jackson

 

“The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.”

- Abraham Lincoln

 

We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans."

- Bill Clinton, USA Today on 3/11/93, page 2a

 

“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”

- Henry Ford

 

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."

- Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991

 

"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

- Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets

 

"It is the system of nationalist individualism that has to go....We are living in the end of the sovereign states....In the great struggle to evoke a Westernized World Socialism, contemporary governments may vanish....Countless people...will hate the new world order....and will die protesting against it." - H.G. Wells, in his book, “The New World Order”, 1940

 

Bankers own the earth; take it away from them but leave them with the power to create credit; and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again... If you want to be slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let the bankers control money and control credit.”

- Sir Josiah Stamp, Director, Bank of England, 1940.

 

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

- David Rockefeller

 

"The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it's profits or so dependent on it's favors, that there will be no opposition from that class." - Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

 

Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws." - Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

 

“I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war.” – Abraham Lincoln - In a letter written to William Elkin

 

"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." - Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, Time Magazine, July 20th, l992

 

“The money power preys on the nation in times of peace, and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes.” - Abraham Lincoln

 

“A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the Nation and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the world - no longer a Government of free opinion no longer a Government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men.... Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” –

Woodrow Wilson - In The New Freedom (1913)

 

The fact is that there is a serious danger of this country becoming a Pluto-democracy; that is, a sham republic with the real government in the hands of a small clique of enormously wealthy men, who speak through their money, and whose influence, even today, radiates to every corner of the United States.” - William McAdoo - President Wilson's national campaign vice-chairman, wrote in Crowded Years

 

If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” - Thomas Jefferson

 

The system of banking [is] a blot left in all our Constitutions, which, if not covered, will end in their destruction... I sincerely believe that banking institutions are more dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity... is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”

- Thomas Jefferson

 

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a moneyed aristocracy that has set the Government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.”

- Thomas Jefferson

 

“... To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition. The incorporation of a bank, and the powers assumed by this bill [chartering the first Bank of the United States], have not, been delegated to the United States by the Constitution.” - Thomas Jefferson - in opposition to the chartering of the first Bank of the United States (1791).

 

“We have stricken the (slave) shackles from four million human beings and brought all laborers to a common level not so much by the elevation of former slaves as by practically reducing the whole working population, white and black, to a condition of serfdom. While boasting of our noble deeds, we are careful to conceal the ugly fact that by an iniquitous money system we have nationalized a system of oppression which, though more refined, is not less cruel than the old system of chattel slavery.” - Horace Greeley - (1811-1872) founder of the New York Tribune

 

When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” - Frederic Bastiat - (1801-1850) in Economic Sophisms

 

“The powers of financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland; a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

- Prof. Carroll Quigley in Tragedy and Hope

 

“In a small Swiss city sits an international organization so obscure and secretive....Control of the institution, the Bank for International Settlements, lies with some of the world's most powerful and least visible men: the heads of 32 central banks, officials able to shift billions of dollars and alter the course of economies at the stroke of a pen.” - Keith Bradsher of the New York Times, August 5, 1995

 

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is eager to enter into close relationship with the Bank for International Settlements....The conclusion is impossible to escape that the State and Treasury Departments are willing to pool the banking system of Europe and America, setting up a world financial power independent of and above the Government of the United States....The United States under present conditions will be transformed from the most active of manufacturing nations into a consuming and importing nation with a balance of trade against it.”

- Rep. Louis McFadden - Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency quoted in the New York Times (June 1930)

 

“Nothing did more to spur the boom in stocks than the decision made by the New York Federal Reserve bank, in the spring of 1927, to cut the rediscount rate. Benjamin Strong, Governor of the bank, was chief advocate of this unwise measure, which was taken largely at the behest of Montagu Norman of the Bank of England....At the time of the Banks action I warned of its consequences....I felt that sooner or later the market had to break.” - Money baron Bernard Baruch in Baruch: The Public Years (1960)

 

“The Federal Reserve Bank is nothing but a banking fraud and an unlawful crime against civilization. Why? Because they "create" the money made out of nothing, and our Uncle Sap Government issues their "Federal Reserve Notes" and stamps our Government approval with NO obligation whatever from these Federal Reserve Banks, Individual Banks or National Banks, etc.” - H.L. Birum, Sr., American Mercury, August 1957, p. 43

 

“[The] abandonment of the gold standard made it possible for the welfare statists to use the banking system as a means to an unlimited expansion of credit.... In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holdings illegal, as was done in the case of gold.... The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.... [This] is the shabby secret of the welfare statist's tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the 'hidden' confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights.” - Alan Greenspan in an article he wrote in 1966.

 

History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” – James Madison

 

"I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within."

- General Douglas MacArthur

 

“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. "An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers."

- U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917

 

 

"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

- Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, "Coningsby, the New Generation", 1844

 

"I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election....It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!"

- George W. Malone, U.S. Senator (Nevada), speaking before Congress, 1957

 

"The United Nations will spearhead our efforts to manage the new conflicts (that afflict our world)....Yes the principles of the United Nations Charter are worth our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor."

- General Colin Powell, 4/21/93, receiving the UN-USA Global Leadership Award

 

The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses... This little coterie...runs our government for their own selfish ends. It operates under cover of a self-created screen...seizes...our executive officers...legislative bodies...schools... courts...newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.”

- John F. Hylan, Mayor of New York, Mayor, 1918-1925

 

"The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power--Political, Monetary, Intellectual, and Ecclesiastical."

- U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater, his book "No Apologies", 1964

 

From the days of Spartacus, Weishaupt, Karl Marx, Trotski, Belacoon, Rosa Luxenberg and Ema Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the under- world of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”

- Winston Churchill to the London press in 1922.

 

"Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away." - Benjamin Netanyahu. 

 

“The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans."

- British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876

 

"For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy making arm of the government."

- President Harry Truman

 

"The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies [Marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other."

- Myron Fagan

 

"From the earliest days, the Rothschilds appreciated the importance of proximity to politicians, the men who determined not only the extent of budget deficits but also the domestic and foreign policies..."

- Niall Ferguson

 

"By remaining behind the scenes, they (the Rothschilds) were able to avoid the brunt of public anger which was directed, instead, at the political figures which they largely controlled. This is a technique which has been practiced by financial manipulators ever since, and it is fully utilized by those who operate the Federal Reserve System today."

- G. Edward Griffin

 

"Lord Rothschild had access to all manner of leaders and experts. He was responsible only to the Prime Minister and answerable to neither the electorate nor the civil service chiefs."

- Derek Wilson

 

"The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds prevailed… Therefore they sent their emissaries into the field to exploit the question of slavery and to open an abyss between the two sections of the Union."

- German chancellor Otto von Bismarck

 

"Throughout the first half of the nineteenth century, the (Rothschild) brothers conducted important transactions on behalf of the governments of England, France, Prussia, Austria, Belgium, Spain, Naples, Portugal, Brazil, various German states and smaller countries. They were the personal bankers of many of the crowned heads of Europe. They made large investments, through agents, in markets as distant as the United States, India, Cuba and Australia." - G. Edward Griffin

 

The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.”

- William Paterson, founder of the Bank of England, 1694.

 

“All the perplexities, confusion and distresses in America arise not from defects in the constitution or confederation, nor from want of honor or virtue, as much from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation.”

- John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson.

 

The money power denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes.”

- Democrat Presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan.

 

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."

- US President James A. Garfield

 

This Federal Reserve Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President (Wilson) signs this bill the invisible government of the Monetary Power will be legalized.”

- Hon. Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr.

 

"Banks lend by creating credit. They create the means of payment out of nothing."

– Ralph M. Hawtrey, former Secretary of Treasury, England.

 

“The process by which banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled.”

- John K. Galbraith, in “Money: Whence it came, where it went”, p. 29.

 

“The banks do create money. They have been doing it for a long time, but they didn't quite realize it, and they did not admit it. Very few did. You will find it in all sorts of documents, financial textbooks, etc. But in the intervening years, and we must all be perfectly frank about these things, there has been a development of thought, until today I doubt very much whether you would get many prominent bankers to attempt to deny that banks create credit.”

- H. W. White, Chairman of the Associated Banks of New Zealand, to the New Zealand Monetary Commission, 1955.

 

“You have to choose [as a voter] between trusting to the natural stability of gold and the natural stability of the honesty and intelligence of the members of the Government. And, with due respect for these gentlemen, I advise you, as long as the Capitalist system lasts, to vote for gold."

- George Bernard Shaw

 

"I have never seen more Senators express discontent with their jobs....I think the major cause is that, deep down in our hearts, we have been accomplices in doing something terrible and unforgivable to our wonderful country. Deep down in our heart, we know that we have given our children a legacy of bankruptcy. We have defrauded our country to get ourselves elected."

- John Danforth (R-Mo)

 

"We are in danger of being overwhelmed with irredeemable paper, mere paper, representing not gold nor silver; no sir, representing nothing but broken promises, bad faith, bankrupt corporations, cheated creditors and a ruined people."

- Daniel Webster

 

“Most Americans have no real understanding of the operations of the international moneylenders... the accounts of the Federal Reserve have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and ... manipulates the credit of the United States”

- Sen. Barry Goldwater (R. –AZ)

 

“Nothing but widespread suffering will produce any effect on Congress... Our only safety is in pursuing a steady course of firm restriction - and I have no doubt that such a course will ultimately lead to restoration of the currency and the re-charter of the bank."

- Nicholas Biddle

 

“The death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom. There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his boots and the bankers went anew to grab the riches. I fear that foreign bankers with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America and use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. They will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos in order that the earth should become their inheritance."

- Otto von Bismarck

 

"There cannot be stable money within an environment dominated by ideologies hostile to the preservation of economic freedom."

- Ludwig von Mises

 

"The study of money, above all other fields in economics, is one in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it."

- John Kenneth Galbraith

 

"Of all the contrivances for cheating the laboring classes of mankind, none has been more effective than that which deludes them with paper money."

- Daniel Webster

 

"Every circulating FRN (Federal Reserve Note) represents a one dollar debt to the Federal Reserve System."

- Money Facts, House Banking and Currency Committee

 

"Neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities, intrinsically; a 'dollar' bill is just a piece of paper. Deposits are merely book entries."

- Modern Money Mechanics Workbook, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 1975

 

"The governments alone are responsible for the spread of the superstitious awe with which the common man looks upon every bit of paper upon which the treasury or agencies which it controls have printed the magical words legal tender."

- Ludwig von Mises

 

"Those who create and issue money and credit direct the policies of government and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people."

- Reginald McKenna, former Chancellor of Exchequer, England

 

"When you or I write a check there must be sufficient funds in our account to cover the check, but when the Federal Reserve writes a check there is no bank deposit on which that check is drawn. When the Federal Reserve writes a check, it is creating money."

- Putting It Simply, Boston Federal Reserve Bank

 

"How pale is the art of sorcerers, witches, and conjurors when compared with that of the government's Treasury Department!"

- Ludwig von Mises

 

"We have, in this country, one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board. This evil institution has impoverished the people of the United States and has practically bankrupted our government. It has done this through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it."

- Congressman Louis T. McFadden in 1932

 

"If you increase the quantity of money, you bring about the lowering of the purchasing power of the monetary unit."

- Ludwig von Mises

 

"Money is the most important subject intellectual persons can investigate and reflect upon. It is so important that our present civilization may collapse unless it is widely understood and its defects remedied very soon."

- Robert H. Hemphill, former credit manager, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

 

"Thus, our national circulating medium is now at the mercy of loan transactions of banks, which lend, not money, but promises to supply money they do not possess."

- Irving Fisher, 100% Money

 

"Without the confidence factor, many believe a paper money system is liable to collapse eventually."

- Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Gold, p. 10

 

 

 

wisehiney's picture

Fuck all of those feminine little civilized ways.

It be time to go anglo saxon on dey ass.

The undefeated.

Yet?

wisehiney's picture

Charlemagne, Magna Carta, CSA .

The most brave declarations.

Except those of 1776.

If one knows any,

We all did it together.

Seek_Truth's picture

I am a descendant of Charlemagne, and a descendant of a Privateer during the Revolutionary War.

I know.

wisehiney's picture

If I dunno know you,

I will mate..

P.S. Oh! That was you!

      Very nice post my kindred spirit.

      Not a bad little ditty.

      I go back to a nice well thought out , heartfelt post  such as yours in the daylight when my eyes are uncrossed, I shall provide more lucent compliments when I  am sober on the morrow.

 

 

stacking12321's picture

"I am a descendant of ... a Privateer during the Revolutionary War."

so, you come from a rape baby?

that explains a lot.

maybe i was too hard on you before; coming from such ignominous beginnings might be enough to turn anyone into a religious nutjob.

Seek_Truth's picture

Hey retard:

Next time, look up the definition before you make a fool of yourself publicly:

pri·va·teer ?pr?v??tir/ noun
historical noun: privateer; plural noun: privateers 1. an armed ship owned and officered by private individuals holding a government commission and authorized for use in war, especially in the capture of enemy merchant shipping.   
My ancestor was a Captain of one such ship, which captured many British ships, which was part of the Revolutionary War! 
How the heck do you get "rape baby" out of that? You prove, once again, what a clueless moron you actually are.
wisehiney's picture

Though Munford was not an advocate for revolution by war, when it came, he fought in defense of Virginia, and was unquestionably a patriot. In his poem "A Patriotic Song," meant to be sung to the tune of "Derry Down," Munford wrote:

We'll drink our own liquor, our brandy from peaches,
A fig for the English, they may kiss all our breeches.
Those blood-sucking, beer-drinking puppies retreat;
But our peach-brandy fellows can never be beat.


Robert Munford died in 1783.

Meet a Patriot and America's first playwright.

OK ZH, who likes Peach Brandy? +1

wisehiney's picture

If your are not afraid of big black bears I can take you to his gravesite when that old far off way down the river train whistle blows.

I cleaned the old Patriots tombstone off last time I was there.

One last slurp of Peach  Brandy boys,  and I AM GONE! So Long.

anonymike's picture

Bravo! Bravo!! The mass murdering psychopaths and sociopaths who call themselves "leaders" of central governments everywhere, and their useful idiots (like those who attack this brilliant article by Brandon Smith), should be horrified by this "Globalist Speak" reply. Thanks for this Seek_Truth. Your collection of quotes has been copied, saved and printed, to be shared with others. Hope many others do the same. Many Cheers

Seek_Truth's picture

You are a true patriot, anonymike!

NoWayJose's picture

There are too many people and not enough 'free resources' left for tribalism. Tribes have typically been nomadic. That won't fly in today's world, even if the central government goes under. You cannot follow the caribou herds, bison migration, or gazelles any more. It would take decades of starvation for the human population to decline and the wildlife population to increase enough to return to a sustainable balance.

Once you have to farm you introduce too many things that you need from outside your tribe.

Even though survivalists think tribes will form (for protection), these wil exist only in small enclaves in isolated parts of the country.

runningman18's picture

Bullshit.  There are plenty of resources - scarcity is a product of the banksters, plus, just because we go "tribal" does not mean we abandon technology.  Invention might even increase.  Farming does not require outside resources in most places.  Just ask most organic farmers where they get their supplies.  A lot of them produce everything on site.  Every problem you brought up is part of the lie that the banksters push when arguing that we can "never go back", including the lie of "overpopulation". 

Implied Violins's picture

Yup. Just look up 'permaculture'. You don't need much at all to be self-sufficient, as long as you don't mind actually working for a living.

If you have a water source; a swimming pool (or other self-contained depression that can hold water); some chickens; some bottom-dwelling fish; worms; and some plants that can use the waste they all produce; you're golden - for a LONG TIME once you get it going.

SgtShaftoe's picture

Getting it stable is the trick though.  Hell, I'm a certified permaculture designer and I have problems all the time.  I just lost my soldier fly larvae bin because it got too hot and dry while I was out of town.  We also lost a bunch of baby turkeys to hawks or owls.  It's a complex system and it's like playing with fire. It's the way to go though.  I've had a lot of success too, but the setbacks sting a bit. 

 

 

Kprime's picture

once the system collapses, you won't be going out of town.  problem solved

stacking12321's picture

scarcity is a product of the banksters

no, scarcity is a fact of living on a finite planet 

and scarcity is the ally of the careful, responsible, and frugal man, it is represented by gold, a rare metal.

the lie of infinite resources is the ally of the banksters and fraudsters, it is represented by paper fiat currency that can be reproduced ad naseum.

we live in a finite world, deal with it, that fact is our savior, not our enemy.


Slomotrainwreck's picture

There are too many people and not enough 'free resources' left for tribalism.

A community od survivalists will quickly learn the best, most efficient, honest and prolific methods for growing, finding, producing and managing food sources. An unproductive person wouldn't last long in such a community.

Read or listen to the audio book The Market for Liberty tonight or sooner.

GRDguy's picture

I suspect that under voluntary tribalism, nobody would profit from lyin' to, stealin' from, or killin' other members. That would be good.

wisehiney's picture

Pure vikin blood, pure sweet gentle spainish conquistador blood, warm femme meditteranean blood, 

 

what is the difference between a little  sweet aborigine tribe of women and a black wnba team?

one is a bunch of cunning little runts,

and the other is a ...........

JailBanksters's picture

Call it what ever you like, but I can't see people begging for the Jew World Order.

The Jew World Order version 1 aka the European Union has been a resounding failure.

There will be a Jew World Order version 2 and possibly even a version 3, but I still can't

see the public voluntarily wanting to be in the Jew World Order, even if you give it a cute and friendly name like the Global Alliance.

nightwish's picture

Fuck the controlling elites. Back to the barter system if need be.

crossroaddemon's picture

Of course as an anarchist I'm in favor of local sovereignty. But thinking that it's inevitably the future is naive. Honestly I think it's far too late, and we're never going to escape the big systems. Orwell was an optimist.

wisehiney's picture

Hope to meet you at the crossroads with the blues and a warm toddy and some not lead for the assholes.

Gentlemen shall be seeking the same on the other side.

VWAndy's picture

 Just saying you can build a pretty cool economy without the rest of the world eating your lunch.

 Old school rope.  /www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnW7-M7aQpQ

  eco friendly too!

wisehiney's picture

Though Munford was not an advocate for revolution by war, when it came, he fought in defense of Virginia, and was unquestionably a patriot. In his poem "A Patriotic Song," meant to be sung to the tune of "Derry Down," Munford wrote:We'll drink our own liquor, our brandy from peaches,
A fig for the English, they may kiss all our breeches.
Those blood-sucking, beer-drinking puppies retreat;
But our peach-brandy fellows can never be beat.

Robert Munford died in 1783.

Meet America's first playwright.

hedgiex's picture

"when every man does what is right according to his own eys", this is not the ingredient for tribalism. Even if tribes are formed, there wil be tribal conflicts that dominate the day. The globalists know it and are merrily sowing the seeds of discordance. All fine and dandy, but the DNAs have not changed. 

negatratoron's picture

government is a mirage, voluntary tribalism is the present

Kirk2NCC1701's picture

We're allegedly incapable of thinking of our individual success and group success?  Are they kidding?

This is S.O.P. for every Jew: "What's in it for me, and what's in it for my People?"

If the Elite (self-Chosenites) can think that way, so can we.

p.s. This is my default subroutine, with every 'My Tribe' v. 'Other Tribes' opportunity.

wisehiney's picture

Your kind rule, dog.

When the chips are down.

Those chosenites fear only you.

More than the devil.s

Get em boy.

wisehiney's picture

Remind me to tell you of TJ's first cousins buried prior to 1760 and I believe lost to history, just up the river ridge.

That is why they flow down here and wallow with me on nights like this.

Along with so many other Patriots, most from old.

 

Cardinal Fang's picture

Globalism is merely a lazy way to take over the world.

It puts one handle on the machinery.

One button on the console.

It's not sociology. It is engineering.

You are either in front of the tank or in the tank.

Even if you desire to avoid the fray, it will find you.

It is designed to find you.

Not being on Facebook is more of a red flag to TPTB

than posting every one of your thoughts there.

Mark of the beast type shit, and I am not biblical at all.

In the context of this article, The Book of Revelation is not a prediction, it is a how to manual.

Father ¢hristmas's picture

Hyperinflation will turn everyone into slaves.  When that fizz stack is ranned through, and you squeezed off that final .22 lr round at rustlers and looters, you will submit.

Take a gander at Venezuela, now close your eyes and imagine the collapse of the world's reserve currency and seeing grocery stores and drug stores guarded by blue helmets.  Cause milk is $100 a gallon and metformin is a grand a bottle.

You ain't gonna submit cause you're a patriot?  Your wife and kids can't eat patriotism.

"Daddy, my stomach hurts.  We don't have any food." gonna turn men into slaves.

wisehiney's picture

Your were not born and raised amongst weak little brown chicken shits.

Please ? You do not know the differnce?

Try being a realist/racist.

Don't try to fool your brain and heart and pride.

Eat that.

SgtShaftoe's picture

By the time I theoretically run out of ammo, I'd have a stack of bodies a mile long that touches the sky.  That doesn't even include my neighbors inventory. 

The blue helmet gang is mostly run by the US and half the time the gang is too scared shitless to leave their FOB.  Blue helmets are the least of your worries believe you me.  Food, Water, Shelter and Sanitation should be everyone's top priorities.  

I'm a peace loving guy and don't care to hurt anyone or anything unless we're going to eat it.  I've also gone through the math before here on insurgency.  Spoiler: They will lose no matter what.  They have already lost.  

Babushkas in the USSR were able to supplement their families enough to keep them alive on .01 acres in a terrible growing season in bad soil.  Imagine what can be done with what is available now or if you made a purpose-built garden. 

Stop being so pessimistic and go plant some shit. 

kooka's picture

Hint, fishing boat (sail and motor), chooks, vege gardens, off-grid power, water bore, and plenty of ammo.

kooka's picture

It aint the phizz stack that will be ranned through, it's anything you need to buy with it. Phizz stack for barter, self sufficency for long term freedom. Fuck slavery.