Newly Leaked Colin Powell Emails Confirm Clintons And Obamas Can't Stand Each Other

Tyler Durden's picture

Seems that Colin Powell is the latest target of the hacking group DC Leaks which apparently posted a treasure trove of 30,000 emails from his private account late last night.  One of the more interesting exchanges is the one below between Powell and Democratic mega donor Jeffrey Leeds which confirms what we've all known all along, namely that the Clintons and Obamas can't stand each other. 

The email exchange was disclosed via the following tweet from Lee Fang at The Intercept:


The following email from Leeds to Powell on March 6, 2016 points out Obama's disdain for his former Secretary of State saying that "I don't think the president would weep if she found herself in real legal trouble."  Well that seems so much more hostile than the friendly embraces and warm speeches we heard at the DNC.



Meanwhile the following email from a year earlier reveals that Hillary "HATES that the President ("that man," as the Clintons call him) kicked her ass in 2008."


Sounds eerily similar to when John McCain made the mistake of referring to Obama as "That One" in a debate which promptly led most of the mainstream media to label him a racist...somehow we suspect Hillary won't receive the same treatment.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
BritBob's picture

She gets on well with Cristina Kirchner, seemingly:


Secretary Clinton on Falklands during press conference with Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, Buenos Aires 2010 : 'As to the first point, we want very much to encourage both countries to sit down. Now, we cannot make either one do so, but we think it is the right way to proceed. So we will be saying this publicly, as I have been, and we will continue to encourage exactly the kind of discussion across the table that needs to take place .'

Now if she'd been well-briefed or done some independent research (she must employ staff to help her out) Hillary wouldn't have fallen for that usurpation (seriously half the world was usurped in the 19th century) and those numerous resolutions that are just proposals from the UN Decolonisation Committee, a committee made up of member states like Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran and Syria. Hm. Should have done better...

Haus-Targaryen's picture

If this is the case, why don't Obama let the FBI and Justice Dept. go to town on her?  

They might hate each other, but like all blood-sucking politicians the only thing more important than the party is their personal careers.  Ego takes a back-seat to both. 


goldsaver's picture

Easy answer. Although their personal power comes first, it is tied with the power of the party. If he would have allowed her to be indicted, the DNC would have (and still probably will) been steam rolled this coming election. Not only that, but with Trump in the WH, most of their "friends and donors", whom they owe favors to, wouldn't get repaid. So, personal animosity must take a back seat to power.

Zero Point's picture

"Pummel his legacy"? Obama loves to have his legacy pummeled. Deep and hard.

philipat's picture

They all have enough shit on each other to bring them down? Politics US style as usual. Constitution anyone?

PS The shit all over the place comment was NOT related to the earlier post but, yeah, possibly....not a pleasnt thought.

wildbad's picture

..that makes three..I can't stand them either

Tarzan's picture

Back on March 14, 2015 Powell and Leeds discussed Hillary's health also

Lee told Powell that, 

"Sheldon Whitehouse, who is a huge Clinton supporter, said they were both giving speeches at the same event a few months back and she could barely climb the podium steps"


Powell wrote back saying,


"she was working herself to death"


and then ended his comment saying,

"She will be 70 her first year in office"

Either Powell sees into the future, or he like so many ZH readers, knows the election is rigged!

jeff montanye's picture

and colin powell is barely not a republican and is out of office for goodness sakes.  how much more must obama and mrs. obama have known of hillary's condition both legal and medical?  and he still offered her unqualified support?

that michelle obama presidential boomlet is looking a little more iffy in this light.

famous 9-11 collapses chronologically: south tower, north tower, wtc 7, hillary clinton, 9-11 official cover story.

hillary clinton: the gift that keeps on giving.

TahoeBilly2012's picture

Two fake politico puppet families who can fake anything, but can't fake their disdain for other competing fakers like them.

CheapBastard's picture

It's interesting to read the [secret] emails between Liars.

f.thomas's picture

yeah, me too but I dare not express the thought. 

grounds for being rascist & misogynic

CuttingEdge's picture

Obama does what his handlers tell him to, Haus.

The Fuckwit-in-Chief is contracted in to a Faustian pact with the same insidious deep state cunts who control Hillary - whether two underlings like each other or not is irrelevant as long as the ship is steady. Problem being, that ship is now being holed repeatedly beneath the water, and there isn't a logical get-out.

CuttingEdge's picture

I'd add to that the proof is in the volume of obfuscation re:Hillary from the White House. If he had had the power to (the Powell emails kinda confirm this, judging by the mutual loathing) he would have buried her years ago. He's been told not to - she's protected, same as him.

Captain Chlamydia's picture

I hate Obama AND Clinton. No revelation or email hack is necessary for that info. 

SubjectivObject's picture

Yes, and you're the only one with a vote [fraction], too.

jeff montanye's picture

as larry summers observed, there are insiders and outsiders.  outsiders can say what they want but insiders don't listen to them.  insiders are listened to but they must not criticize other insiders.

fleur de lis's picture

Any email leaks from Icky Vicky Neudelman?

The bungled Ukraine fiasco must have generated volumes of emails.

Not that it matters to unelected, unaccountable .gov psychopaths who have wads of blank checks for instigating murder and mayhem and never ever have to worry about getting fired.

Erek's picture

She's probably leaking something other than emails.

lasvegaspersona's picture

Watched Putin's top 10 speeches last night...he has a good memory...even if they don't have emails . I'm certain his memory will hold. He is still pissed about the Russians 'shot in the back' by Turkey. He is also taking notes on American policy that does not line up with American stated ideals and treaties.

I'm sure he'll mention it ahain at some point. Obama better hope the US is still very poerful when he does. I doubt many would come to his defense if there was an interpol warrant.

drendebe10's picture

The two most despicable human turds on the face of the earth.

mygameon's picture

Leg assy pummeled maybe?

wildbad's picture

...and party loyalt is subservient to NWO pyramidal loyalty.  CFR, RSL, Bilderberg and all associated kings of the world

mkkby's picture

Love the picture of colon licker and the cunt.  She has a big broad smile, trying to suck up to him.  He is leaning away, and looks like he just smelled dog shit.

He obviously hates her like a disease.

IronForge's picture

It would be funny if the POTUS sets the DOJ against the Madame Secretary AFTER the Elections.

If She wins and then gets Indicted/Arrested/Held-w/o-Bail, will the DNC have to come up with a Replacement?

If "The Donald" wins in that situation, I'm certain that he won't Pardon Her - He probably would have someone ship the DOJ a set of Wooden Stakes cut from unblemished Trees unfed by the blood of the Living and Holy Water Blessed by Genuinely Holy Clergy from around the World.

mkkby's picture

If Trump wins, the kenyan nigger will pardon her.  He can't set the precedent of hanging former colleagues out to dry.  He has plenty of dirty laundry, and he wants his billion in speaking fees.

Clark Bent's picture

These people are not Americans, and are in the business of selling the nation (and us) to their internationalist bosses. Our future is as a territory in the new world order, after the genocidal liquidations improve the demographics to their liking.  

olenumbersix's picture

Who does the sec. of state email ? Improperly stored or sent state secrets are to be reported, and no one reported her. Hrc goes down, they all do. Maybe the potus isn't protecting Clinton, rather he is covering his own ass.

reallyseriousstuffnews's picture

She's been around the block, most likely she knows shit about them and they don't want her dragging them down with her.

El Vaquero's picture

How much do you want to bet that Hillary has enough dirt on Obama to take his ass down?  I bet there is some MAD going on between those two. 

bigkahuna's picture

This is why these fools don't roll on each other - nothing else. Their egos are too big for all the political correctness that they seem to force feed their slaves. They only give a rats behind for their own image - and the dirt cannot come out, or who nows what would happen. Probably nothing unless the "plebes" show up with some serious firepower - (not happening).

GeezerGeek's picture

So if Hillary dies before the election and another is selected to run as the Democrat, will Bill decide to go nuclear against Obama?

I'd rather she not die but get her rewards here on Earth, but if it were a choice of both (death and going nuclear) or neither, I'll take both.

GeezerGeek's picture

What you describe resembles "professional courtesy" between lawyers. It also resembles the attitude exhibited by certain minorities who reserve to themselves the right to use certain descriptive terms while denying that right to others.

A bigger question - one which indicates to false story of the USA having two major political parties - would ask why Republicans aren't all over these issues.

At ZH we know the answer. I call it the Uniparty.

adanata's picture


The "uniparty"... that's good. I've been calling it the "Money" party for a long time...

BritBob's picture

I'm affraid it's a matter of the US government sitting on the fence. They apparently believe that Argentina's mythical Malvinas claim and their attidude has been to accept UK defacto sovereignty when Argentina has never legally possessed the islands. How can you claim something that you have never legally owned? 

revjimbeam's picture

well, now we know. self preservation. since he used in alias and knew of her email system the entire time. unfortunate ,though, that his pseudonym was redacted. im sure it would have turned up in conversations with lois lerner

Badsamm's picture

I think all three of them suck and should be in jail.

GUS100CORRINA's picture

Yes ... I agree with people who have commented on zerohedge. These people in this article have a lot lacking when it comes to leadership.


So ... What kind of leader does America need? 

A leader with character, with biblical convictions. A leader who is virtuous; a leader who is virtuous and careful with power, who is a strong advocate for all that honors God, who submits himself to God’s commands and is a worshiper of the true God. There is no – listen – no other way to distinguish a good leader from a bad leader. God’s standards are the only authoritative criteria. A leader without virtue, a leader without character, is like a surgeon who is contaminated; the patient will die.


Unfortunately, leaders in America today are like a surgeon who is contaminated. The patient (AMERICA) is dying a slow, painful death as a result.




SubjectivObject's picture

Mammals, with recent thinking brains.

Evolving, or not, at the rate of evolutionary change.

Deities are not off the hook of responsibility for the creation of humans and what they do.

Bearing in mind that, physically, humans have not created one thing that the substance/pattern for which did not already exist.

Psychologically speaking though ... now there's the rub.

lasvegaspersona's picture

Gus...the problem with religious requirements is that people kill each other over trying to decide which god and which biblical/koran passages.

How about we stick with character and and a history of good behavior. Let god decide if they chose the right things to believe.

GeezerGeek's picture

I believe it was John Adams who said something like this: "The Constitution is designed for a moral and religious people. It will not suffice for any other."

The sssumption is that people share a common understanding of right and wrong. Lacking that, we need laws to control every single interaction, no matter how small. With moral relativists and people who accept lying as moral if done for the right reason, a minimalist body of law is impossible.

You are correct to the extent that the Constitution forbids any religious test. Voters, however, are not bound by that restriction and should (as you suggest) stick with character and a history of good behavior. Of course, different people construe "good behavior" differently.

I would rather have a minimum of laws and a generally homogeneous, self-regulating culture than a diverse culture requiring multitudes of laws.

Thinkor's picture

I'm not Christian, but, objectively speaking, the USA worked a lot better when Christians were about 90% of the population.

Far better a Methodist or a Mormon than a Marxist or a Muslim.


otschelnik's picture

Christina is long gone now, they elected Mauricio Macri, Falklands are not really on the front burner now, and we thank you for your multiple posts on this issue.  We get it, and you can stop now. 

BritBob's picture

The Argentinean government blows hot and cold with their mythcal Malvinas claim. What will follow Macri?  The claim has to be brought out into the open and ridiculed. 

Chris Dakota's picture
Chris Dakota (not verified) BritBob Sep 14, 2016 3:36 AM

Read Powell is involved with a company that defrauds veterans of their education GI bill money.

Washington DC is a rat hole.

Clark Bent's picture

True dat, wasn't this leader supposed to be a Republican, a loyal friend of the Bushes, and a patriotic soldier? Do these emails reflect that? 

Billy the Poet's picture

Powell's lying UN speech on Iraq showed his loyalty to those folks and some others as well.

Dr. Bonzo's picture

She shouldn't really hate on Barry too much. He can't help it The Powers decided a Bush-Klinton-Bush-Klinton dynastic rule interspersed with the largest attack on America, a few unwinnable wars and a tanking economy might lead to guillotines for all at some point. Barry did his job like a pro. A real pitchman. Hillary has no one but herself to blame for being a fucking drunken cunt. She ruined her own health thinking she could go on a party binge while she waited for her turn on the throne. Dumb arrogant cunt.

Anyhoo, too bad Powell's My Lai memos weren't written in the digital age. Now that'd be some good shit.

BorisTheBlade's picture

What's puzzling is the propensity to share gossip and opinion in the e-mail form. Such a self-implicating way to talk to someone, it's like they want their dirty laundry to be well-documented and hanged in the open for the entire world to see. Russia did that? Well, Russia certainly didn't write those e-mails. Pretty dumb.

Dr. Bonzo's picture

What's puzzling is the propensity to share gossip and opinion in the e-mail form

True. Never done it. Seems these Masters of the Universe just don't understand what digital really means. As soon as a digital file copy exists off of your hard drive, it belongs to the universe. They don't seem to get it. Now consider that. The people running the planet not really grasping the inherent properties of the principle technology underlying all technological development. I can't think of a more disastrous prescription for total societal collapse. Sad.