British Parliament Confirms Libya War Was Based On Lies … Turned Nation Into a “Shit Show” … Spread Terrorism

George Washington's picture
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6-x-cT42b8U/TlFEqwDTchI/AAAAAAAAKng/YIUYeB98Ypc/s1600/anthony+freda+HumanitarianBombs.jpg

Anthony Freda: www.AnthonyFreda.com.

Parliamentary Report Confirms What the Alternative Media Has Been Saying for Years

The UK Parliament just confirmed what the alternative media has been saying for years.

Specifically, a new report from the bipartisan House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee – based on interviews with all of the key British decision-makers, review of documents, and on-the-ground investigations in Africa – found that Libyan war was based on lies, that it destroyed the country, and that it spread terrorism far and wide.

The War Based On Bogus Intelligence … Like the Iraq War

Initially, the report finds that the threat to civilians from Libyan  government forces was dramatically overstated:

Former French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé, who introduced Resolution 1973 [imposing a no-fly zone over Libya, and laying the groundwork for overthrowing the government], asserted in his speech to the Security Council that “the situation on the ground is more alarming than ever, marked by the violent re-conquest of cities”. He stressed the urgency of the situation, arguing that “We have very little time left—perhaps only a matter of hours.” Subsequent analysis suggested that the immediate threat to civilians was being publicly overstated and that the reconquest of cities had not resulted in mass civilian casualties.

 

***

 

The proposition that Muammar Gaddafi would have ordered the massacre of civilians in Benghazi  [which was the basis for the West’s war to overthrow Gaddafi] was not supported by the available evidence. The Gaddafi regime had retaken towns from the rebels without attacking civilians in early February 2011 …. Gaddafi regime forces targeted male combatants in a civil war and did not indiscriminately attack civilians. More widely, Muammar Gaddafi’s 40-year record of appalling human rights abuses did not include large-scale attacks on Libyan civilians.

 

***

 

On 17 March 2011, Muammar Gaddafi announced to the rebels in Benghazi, “Throw away your weapons, exactly like your brothers in Ajdabiya and other places did. They laid down their arms and they are safe. We never pursued them at all.” Subsequent investigation revealed that when Gaddafi regime forces retook Ajdabiya in February 2011, they did not attack civilians. Muammar Gaddafi also attempted to appease protesters in Benghazi with an offer of development aid before finally deploying troops.

 

***

 

An Amnesty International investigation in June 2011 could not corroborate allegations of mass human rights violations by Gaddafi regime troops. However, it uncovered evidence that rebels in Benghazi made false claims and manufactured evidence. The investigation concluded that

much Western media coverage has from the outset presented a very one-sided view of the logic of events, portraying the protest movement as entirely peaceful and repeatedly suggesting that the regime’s security forces were unaccountably massacring unarmed demonstrators who presented no security challenge.

***

 

In short, the scale of the threat to civilians was presented with unjustified certainty. US intelligence officials reportedly described the intervention as “an intelligence-light decision”.

Just like the ginned up intelligence used to justify the Iraq war. And the “humanitarian wars” waged over the last couple of decades.

The Libyan Government Was Fighting Terrorists

The report also notes that the Libyan government really was – as Libyan dictator Gaddafi claimed at the time – fighting Islamic terrorists based in Benghazi:

Intelligence on the extent to which extremist militant Islamist elements were involved in the anti-Gaddafi rebellion was inadequate.

 

***

 

Abdelhakim Belhadj and other members of the al-Qaeda affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group were participating in the rebellion in March 2011.

Secret intelligence reports from 2011, written before and during the illegal US-led attack on Libya and recently obtained by the Washington Times, state:

There is a close link between al Qaeda, Jihadi organizations, and the opposition in Libya…

Indeed, the Libyan rebel commander admitted at the time that his fighters had links to Al Qaeda.  And see this.

We reported in 2012:

The U.S. supported opposition which overthrew Libya’s Gadaffi was largely comprised of Al Qaeda terrorists. According to a 2007 report by West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center’s center, the Libyan city of Benghazi was one of Al Qaeda’s main headquarters – and bases for sending Al Qaeda fighters into Iraq – prior to the overthrow of Gaddafi:

The Hindustan Times reported last year:

“There is no question that al Qaeda’s Libyan franchise, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, is a part of the opposition,” Bruce Riedel, former CIA officer and a leading expert on terrorism, told Hindustan Times.

 

It has always been Qaddafi’s biggest enemy and its stronghold is Benghazi.

***

(Incidentally, Gaddafi was on the verge of invading Benghazi in 2011, 4 years after the West Point report cited Benghazi as a hotbed of Al Qaeda terrorists. Gaddafi claimed – rightly it turns out – that Benghazi was an Al Qaeda stronghold and a main source of the Libyan rebellion.  But NATO planes stopped him, and protected Benghazi.)

The Daily Mail reported in 2014:

A self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn’t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.

 

‘The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.

 

She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.

 

‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..

 

‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’

 

***

 

‘The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’

 

‘Some look at it as treason,’ said Wayne Simmons, a former CIA officer who participated in the commission’s research.

The West and Its Allies Directly Supported and Armed the Rebels

The UK report confirms that the West and its allies directly supported and armed the rebels:

The combat performance of rebel ground forces was enhanced by personnel and intelligence provided by states such as the UK, France, Turkey, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. For example, Lord Richards told us that the UK “had a few people embedded” with the rebel forces.

 

Resolution 1973 called on United Nations member states to ensure the “strict implementation of the arms embargo”. However, we were told that the international community turned a blind eye to the supply of weapons to the rebels. Lord Richards highlighted “the degree to which the Emiratis and the Qataris … played a major role in the success of the ground operation.” For example, Qatar supplied French Milan anti­tank missiles to certain rebel groups. We were told that Qatar channelled its weapons to favoured militias rather than to the rebels as a whole.

The REAL Motivation for War

The real motivation for the war?  The Parliamentary report explains:

A further insight into French motivations was provided in a freedom of information disclosure by the United States State Department in December 2015. On 2 April 2011, Sidney Blumenthal, adviser and unofficial intelligence analyst to the then United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, reported this conversation with French intelligence officers to the Secretary of State:

 

According to these individuals Sarkozy’s plans are driven by the following issues:

 

  1. A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,
  2. Increase French influence in North Africa,
  3. Improve his internal political situation in France,
  4. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world,
  5. Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi’s long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in Francophone Africa.

 

The sum of four of the five factors identified by Sidney Blumenthal equated to the French national interest. The fifth factor was President Sarkozy’s political self-interest.

Gaddafi Tried to Step Down … But the West Insisted On Violent Regime Change

Gaddafi had offered to hand over power, but the West instead wanted violent regime change. (The British report notes: “By the summer of 2011, the limited intervention to protect civilians had drifted into an opportunist policy of regime change.”)

The Parliamentary report notes that Gaddaffi may have been attempting to flee the country when he was killed:

Muammar Gaddafi might have been seeking an exit from Libya in February and March 2011. On 21 February 2011, for example, Lord Hague told reporters that he had seen credible information that Muammar Gaddafi was on his way to exile in Venezuela. Concerted action after the telephone calls conducted by Mr Blair might have led to Muammar Gaddafi’s abdication and to a negotiated solution in Libya. It was therefore important to keep the lines of communication open. However, we saw no evidence that the then Prime Minister David Cameron attempted to exploit Mr Blair’s contacts.

 

***

 

Political options were available if the UK Government had adhered to the spirit of Resolution 1973, implemented its original campaign plan and influenced its coalition allies to pause military action when Benghazi was secured in March 2011. Political engagement might have delivered civilian protection, regime change and reform at lesser cost to the UK and to Libya. If political engagement had been unsuccessful, the UK and its coalition allies would not have lost anything. Instead, the UK Government focused exclusively on military intervention. In particular, we saw no evidence that it tried to exploit former Prime Minister Tony Blair’s contacts and influence with the Gaddafi regime.

The U.S. and France were also hell-bent on regime change.  And the New York Times confirms that Hillary Clinton is largely responsible for the violent regime change in Libya.

Why Should We Care?

Why should we care?

Well, the House of Commons report confirms that the Libyan war has wrecked the country:

The Libyan economy generated some $75 billion of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2010. This economy produced an average annual per capita income of approximately $12,250, which was comparable to the average income in some European countries. [The former Indian representative to the U.N. notes that, before the war, Libya had less of its population in poverty than the Netherlands.  Libyans had access to free health care, education, electricity and interest-free loans, and women had great freedoms that were applauded by the U.N. Human Rights Council]. Libyan Government revenue greatly exceeded expenditure in the 2000s. … The United Nations Human Development Report 2010—a United Nations aggregate measure of health, education and income—ranked Libya as the 53rd most advanced country in the world for human development and as the most advanced country in Africa.

 

***

 

In 2014, the most recent year for which reliable figures are available … the average Libyan’s annual income had decreased from $12,250 in 2010 to $7,820.  Since 2014, Libya’s economic predicament has reportedly deteriorated. Libya is likely to experience a budget deficit of some 60% of GDP in 2016. The requirement to finance that deficit is rapidly depleting net foreign reserves, which halved from $107 billion in 2013 to $56.8 billion by the end of 2015. Production of crude oil fell to its lowest recorded level in 2015, while oil prices collapsed in the second half of 2014. Inflation increased to 9.2% driven by a 13.7% increase in food prices including a fivefold increase in the price of flour. The United Nations ranked Libya as the world’s 94th most advanced country in its 2015 index of human development, a decline from 53rd place in 2010.

 

***

 

In 2016, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimated that out of a total Libyan population of 6.3 million, 3 million people have been impacted by the armed conflict and political instability, and that 2.4 million people require protection and some form of humanitarian assistance. In its World Report 2016, Human Rights Watch stated that Libya is

heading towards a humanitarian crisis, with almost 400,000 people internally displaced and increasing disruption to basic services, such as power and fuel supplies. Forces engaged in the conflict continued with impunity to arbitrarily detain, torture, unlawfully kill, indiscriminately attack, abduct and disappear, and forcefully displace people from their homes. The domestic criminal justice system collapsed in most parts of the country, exacerbating the human rights crisis

People-trafficking gangs exploited the lack of effective government after 2011, making Libya a key transit route for illegal migration into Europe and the location of a migrant crisis. In addition to other extremist militant groups, ISIL emerged in Libya in 2014, seizing control of territory around Sirte and setting up terrorist training centres. Human Rights Watch documented unlawful executions by ISIL in Sirte of at least 49 people by methods including decapitation and shooting. The civil war between west and east has waxed and waned with sporadic outbreaks of violence since 2014. In April 2016, United States President Barack Obama described post-intervention Libya as a “shit show”. It is difficult to disagree with this pithy assessment.

The Parliamentary report confirms that the Libyan war – like the Iraq war – has ended up spreading terrorism around the globe:

Libyan weapons and ammunition were trafficked across North and West Africa and the Middle East.

 

***

 

The United Nations Panel of Experts appointed to examine the impact of Resolution 1973 identified the presence of ex-Libyan weapons in Algeria, Chad, Egypt, Gaza, Mali, Niger, Tunisia and Syria. The panel concluded that “arms originating from Libya have significantly reinforced the military capacity of terrorist groups operating in Algeria, Egypt, Mali and Tunisia.” In the 2010-15 Parliament, our predecessor Committee noted that the failure to secure the Gaddafi regime’s arms caches had led to “a proliferation of small arms and light weapons, and some heavier artillery, across North and West Africa”. It identified that Libyan small arms had apparently ended up in the hands of Boko Haram militants.

 

***

 

In January 2014, Egyptian Islamist insurgents used an ex-Libyan MANPAD to shoot down an Egyptian Army helicopter in the Sinai.

 

***

 

The FCO told us that “Political instability in Libya has led to a permissive environment for terrorist groups in which to operate, including ISIL [i.e. ISIS] affiliated groups”.   Professor Patrick Porter, Professor of Strategic Studies at the University of Exeter, agreed with the FCO analysis, stating that “a lack of effective government is creating opportunities for the Islamic State.”

 

***

 

ISIL has used its presence in Libya to train terrorists. For example, Sefeddine Rezgui, the gunman who killed Western holidaymakers in Tunisia in June 2015, was trained by ISIL at its base in Sabratha along with the two gunmen who killed 22 tourists at the Bardo museum in Tunis. ISIL’s plans may extend beyond terrorism. Vice-Admiral Clive Johnstone, a Royal Navy officer and NATO commander, commented that

We know they [ISIL] have ambitions to go offshore … There is a horrible opportunity in the future that a misdirected, untargeted round of a very high quality weapons system will just happen to target a cruise liner, or an oil platform, or a container ship.

And the UK report confirms that the Libyan war has created a tidal wave of refugees:

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) estimated that some 1 million migrants were present in Libya in June 2016. This estimate comprised 425,000 internally displaced Libyans, 250,000 non-Libyan migrants and 250,000 returnees. Most non-Libyan migrants travelled from West Africa, the Horn of Africa, South Asia and the Middle East. The most common countries of origin for non-Libyan migrants were Niger, Egypt, Chad, Ghana and Sudan. Between 1 January and 31 May 2016, 47,851 migrants arrived in Italy after crossing the Mediterranean from Libya. A similar number of migrants attempted the crossing over the same period in 2015. Despite the increased resources committed to Operation Triton, however, crossing the Mediterranean is becoming increasingly hazardous for migrants transiting through Libya. The IOM recorded 2,061 migrants as dead or missing between 1 January and 31 May 2016, which showed a 15% increase in fatalities compared with the same period in 2015.

In other words – just like the Iraq war – the Libyan war was based on fake intelligence, was carried out for reasons having little to do with national security or protecting civilians, destroyed a nation and created a “shit show”, spread terrorism far and wide, and created waves of refugees.

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
JackieG's picture

Libyan's are cowards.

A real Libyan would have killed HRC the moment Ghaddafi bought it.

A real Libyan would have kept Obama from ever being seen in public again.

Same goes for that little French creep who is thinking of running for office again.

NuYawkFrankie's picture

The bWitish parliament of whores has to be  the biiggest bunch of lame-dick hypocrites on the planet - ALWAYS great at hand-wringing AFTER THE FACT - but all to eager to be lead by their little peckers by WAR CRIMINALS like  Cameron & Blair when the crimes are being committed.

 

 

 

 

taketheredpill's picture

According to these individuals Sarkozy’s plans are driven by the following issues:

 

  1. A desire to gain agreater share of Libya oil production,
  2. Increase French influencein North Africa,
  3. Improve his internal political situationin France,
  4. Provide the French military with an opportunity toreassert its position in the world,
  5. Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi’s long term plans to supplant France as thedominant power in Francophone Africa.

 

I think the US Grand Plan is Control of the OIL.  BUT, you can't control Oil if it gets used up by Domestic Industrial Production.  So..ala Iraq..you detsroy all the infrastructure, foster infighting between Sunnis/Shia (blow up alternate Mosques on different days) and if all else fails unleash demented fundamentalists to take society back to the Middle Ages.

 

So the OIL stays "Safe and Sound".."In the Ground".

 

Until you need it.

 

milanolarry's picture

Will they charge the war criminals?

Raul44's picture

Probably not. They need to be murdered by its own people.

MEAN BUSINESS's picture

Let's see if F.M. Lavrov alludes to Lybia today in his address at the U.N. To me, President Putin not speaking for the Russian Federation speaks volumes...

cut to the chase Serg

Thanks for the heads-up on this report George Washington.

MEAN BUSINESS's picture

Today LAVROV did cut to the chase, 62 dead Syrian soldiers and an aid convoy in Aleppo. It was a review of (channeling Vlad) SEP15 +... and yeah including Lybia. And Paris Protocol. And PHI and CIV. LULZ.

https://gadebate.un.org/en/71/russian-federation

Back to you UNGA71 prez, you were saying???

MEAN BUSINESS's picture

No replies huh? Let's try the Luxboor loser, the German twit and the Swedish twat...

MEAN BUSINESS's picture

That's French for "asshole". Just ask Justin. Fasshole qui?

MEAN BUSINESS's picture

Peter Thomson, President, United Nations General Assembly, 20SEP16:

"Millions of people around the globe are suffering the brutal effects of war. The crisis in Syria continues to bring immense human suffering to the Syrian people. Both those who have fled in search of sanctuary and those who have stayed under inhumane conditions. I STRONGLY CONDEMN the attacks on a UN aid convoy seeking to bring desperately needed food and medical supplies to people in need. The deliberate targeting of humanitarian personnel is a flagrant violation of international law and totally morally unacceptable. " (applause)

----------

Professional Liar of Luxembourg just raised the Syrian ceasefire, skipped right past the 62 dead Syrian soldiers to blame Syrian government for not doing enough to protect humanitarian aid convoy. 

DuneCreature's picture

Divide and conquer is as old as human history.

People fall for the stupidest memes from the evilest of hate hawking conmen.

Educating each other to this ploy is the only way out of this maze.

It is way past time to take the reigns of power and control away from a certain group of people.

Rule From The Shadows

TPTB (Ass Wipes Inc) know they can survive WW III in their bunkers.

They consider the entire northern hemisphere expendable. (For a generation or two.)

Our 'leaders' want you and me disarmed, asset stripped and then mostly dead.

And now they have an AI computer system running the shit show.

Live Hard, Time To Get Together And Lance This Festering Boil, Die Free

~ DC v2.0

NotGrokkingIt's picture

Very interested in your comment regarding AI computer system running things.  This is the premise in the SciFi novels Hyperion & Fall of Hyperion.  Do you have any additional information regarding this?

DuneCreature's picture

There is extensive information on AI AL here:

Level 9 News - DJ Welsh

The information is scattered and DJ tends to not connect the dots for you. .. She deals with strictly what can be documented. (Good for her.)

I can connect some of the dots and tell you the problem is much worse that it appears working just off of dot gov declassified docs.

AI AL IS NOT a US gov program. .. It is owned by TPTB (I call them Ass Wipes Inc.) and they are not beholden to anyone, any nation or any oversight. .... See the bad juju brewing concerning AI AL? (The system is brewed, on line and running, not brewing, BTW.)

DoD does the research and the CeyeA pinches the tech.

Live Hard, AI Could Be Used For Good But The Bad Guys 'Stole/Bought It And Use It For Themselves Only, Die Free'

~ DC v2.0

zippy_uk's picture

In the Middle East, yet another case of better the despotic, fascistic dictator you know.

dizzyfingers's picture

All wars are about and for bankers, right? They own everything including politicians and news media so why are we so stupid about believing we should give up our lives and our childrens' lives for them? SERIOUSLY folks, WAKE UP! Stop watching tv news and don't listen to news on radio, nor read "news"papers or magazines. THINK FOR YOURSELVES. Through "media" we are led by our noses to interfere in everyone else's business. Life is short; don't waste it on banker priorities.

mary mary's picture

England to Libyans: "Well, looks like we lied, invaded your home. killed your leader, raped your sisters, bombed your house, and stole your gold.  But, you know, we're England, so we've done this uncountable times before, and England has a proud tradition of never giving other people's countries back to them, so we'll just keep soldiers in your country to make sure you don't get your country back.  But DON'T tell us we're racist, because we're not: we put dark-skinned actors on our BBC television shows all the time.  See?  That proves it."

KuriousKat's picture

If one visists wiki..one can see all the revisonist sourcing to BBC and CNN in 2011 ..but there was a jewel

from 1999..that will  put him in a kinder light..miracle it was not removed..

"It was pure expediency to call on democratic South Africa to turn its back on Libya and Qaddafi, who had assisted us in obtaining democracy at a time when those who now made that call were the friends of the enemies of democracy in South Africa." SPEECH BY PRESIDENT NELSON MANDELA AT A LUNCHEON IN HONOUR OF MUAMAR QADDAFI, LEADER OF THE REVOLUTION OF THE LIBYAN JAMAHARIYA, Cape Town, 13 June 1999

oncemore's picture

USA goes hand in hand ith UK. No difference.

Lucky Leprachaun's picture

THis report is inadequate in that it lays all the blame on Sarkozy and the French. While that little rat is due his share of odium other major drivers for Gaddafi's ouster included the undermining of the petrodollar and pressure/bribes from Qatar and Saudi Arabia who were getting repeatedly attacked on Islamic forums by Gaddagi. And of course the destruction of Libya also fits nicely into the broader Yinon Plan.

KuriousKat's picture

If you read Hillarys and Humas and Sids emails then you know it was not Sarkozy alone and the other agendas involved. What was done to Libya is what was done the Carthage by the Romans poisoning the ground..so it could never rise again. Qatar and SA were huge donors to Hillary since the 90s..and they called their favors in promptly to get rid of a competitor who had made deals with China..a customer.. They will get their just deserts soon enough..irrespective how much we sell them in arms..

medium giraffe's picture

I'm getting really bored of doing the 'I fucking told you so' dance.  How about you guys?  George? 

(Georgie must be going through pairs upon pairs of shoes...)

mary mary's picture

I expect MSM to spend about 15 seconds on this, and then, NEXT, IT'S DONALD TRUMP'S HAIRCUT!  DOES HE OR DOESN'T HE?

Long memory man's picture

This is a very good article, many thanks.

I live in the UK and have seen no metion of this on the BBC (no surprise).

The gold Dinar would have screwed the Franc in Africa, Sarcosy could not have that at any price, the price was Libya being turned into a tribal desert again when it was at one time the most prosperous county in Africa.

Camaeron = crook.

Blair = crook

But the truth gets out in the end.

 

Dugald's picture

 

But the truth gets out in the end.   True.....but nobody goes to prison....!!

mary mary's picture

But but the UK is a "free country", isn't it?

webmatex's picture

Excellent article as always GWB - and thanks.

So fucking sad.

Clinton, Sarky, Cameron to the Haig - it WILL happen.

And the horrific results of war across the ME are now reflected in our own society, the first bombs and bullets, the austerity, educational and health service decline, poverty, hunger and unceasing lies and misinformation, rotting infrastructure and near collapse of social values.

Its clear that the system treats all human life with equal contempt - its anti human and anti life.

Time to put these fuckers down for good. Us or them.

Teach your Children

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkaKwXddT_I

 

GoldenDonuts's picture

911 was an inside job and everything that has happened since is a derivative of that.   Three huge sky scrapers fall into their own basements just like a controlled demolition because TWO of them were hit by aircraft.  Even if you believe that the two that were hit by the aircraft could fall into their own basement what about the third?  If you believe that a sky scraper can fall down because some furniture caught on fire then you should never enter another tall building again because clearly they are too fragile for safety.

Iraq was B.S.,  Egypt yup, Libya lies, Syria lies, immigration of "refugees" = power grab

 

The sooner that Trump is elected the better.  I am kind of sad that Trey Gowdy isn't running however.  Now that guy would kick ass and take names

Radical Marijuana's picture

"The UK Parliament just confirmed what the alternative media has been saying for years."

Since I looked at what the alternative media were saying, I already knew ... However, consider the case of Canada, where ALL of the political parties represented in Parliament are practically guaranteed to deliberately ignore this kind of pattern of social facts, while the Canadian mass media will surely aid and abet those politicians doing that. Furthermore, that is the same basic pattern throughout the Anglo American (Zionist) Empire, which is found to be similar, to somewhat varying degrees, in all NATO countries.

HUGE LIES DOMINATE SO MUCH THAT MORE RADICAL TRUTHS ARE IRRELEVANT. My experiences are that the more one considers as many different points of view as possible, by looking at the wide variety of alternative news, the WORSE it gets, because one then ends up returning to look at the mass media, and the mainstream politicians, only to become even less able to maintain any rational hopes for the foreseeable finite future of a civilization that is already almost totally based upon enforcing frauds, and is automatically becoming exponentially more fraudulent.

Although I like to read George Washington's well-documented reports, I find doing so to be something akin to being masochistic, because of the degree to which not only does it makes no practical political difference, but also, there are no feasible ways that more radical truths are ever going to make any significant difference to the entrenched systems based upon being able to back up Huge Lies with Lots Of Violence, which results in the most socially successful people continuing to be the best available professional hypocrites, who mostly get a free pass to be able to deliberately ignore the kinds of information that George Washington's articles present.

Another example was that not only was

the following article surely correct, but also,

it very probably will continue to be correct:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-13/false-flag-terror-“has-succeeded-consistently-against-audiences-around-world-millenn

False Flag Terror “Has Succeeded Consistently Against Audiences Around The World, For Millennia, To Compel War”

Therefore, the only thing that happens is that
THE MORE ONE KNOWS THE WORSE IT GETS.

By their own follies they perished, the fools.

-- Homer, The Odyssey

Verily 'tis the sorest of all human ills,
to abound in knowledge and yet
have no power over action.

-- Herodotus, The History, quoting Thersander.

SmittyinLA's picture

Bombing for dollars is a Demoblican party activity

JailBanksters's picture

The Internet community has known this since day one.

Which would make Syria, off the fricking scale as far a Fraud goes.

If any Organization deserves to be investigated it is the Pentagram.

7 Countries in 5 years, the timetable is off but the result is not.

 

 

Miss Expectations's picture

Another tidbit from Judicial Watch database.

The interests of Symbion Power/Joe Wilson all via Blumenthal to Clinton

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Sid-Joe-Wilson-S...

Miss Expectations's picture

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STkiyPhYoxA

General David Grange--->Osprey Global Solutions--->Sydney Blumenthal---->Hillary Clinton--->Death & Destruction 

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/05/28/sidney_blumenthal_clin...

Brig. Gen. David L. Grange doesn't wear a star on his shoulder much since his retirement in 1999. But he's on the list of retired officers the Pentagon has cultivated in an effort to influence domestic news coverage of military matters. 

In fact, Grange, a CNN analyst, was tagged as the most visible shill for the Pentagon since 2002. 

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/pentagon-shill-returns-to-cnn-to-...

Arms shipments from Benghazi to Syria:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Pgs.-1-3-2-3-fro...

From the summer of 2009 to the present day, according to Fox News, Blumenthal was paid $200,000 a year by Media Matters, an aggressive pro-Clinton information outlet led by David Brock. Blumenthal provides “high-level strategy and messaging advice” to Brock and others. http://nypost.com/2015/10/31/hillary-clintons-rogue-agenda-why-sid-blume...

Great job George...all the key points in one article.  In my opinion General Grange and Sidney Blumenthal have be overlooked and hold the keys.

Steeley's picture

I knew that there was gonna be payback for Gaddafi-duck accepting Saddam's nuke shit and turning them over to the US claiming they were his and he'd repented.

Bush couldn't retaliate given that gambit, had to suck it up and leave that clean-up to the next mirror-administration. Of COURSE the given reason for the Libya War was lies - no way they could imply that Bush was right all along by stating the real reason for sticking it back up Gaddafi-duck's digestive track. Obama didn't know whether to shit or go blind over the middle east (or rather, talked shit but was blind), Hillary was brought in for guidance, the French saw the opening, misjudged her degree of incompetence, and while it all could have gone down clean, once again she fucked that up too.

Mel Brooks could have scripted and directed this, but he'd have written it so all the extras weren't offed during the shoot.

Reaper's picture

This Parliament Report is full of sound and fury, while the Parliament does nothing different.

spencer's picture

French involvement in Libya is a direct result of Sarkozy coop with MOSSAD

http://www.globalresearch.ca/sarkozy-accused-of-working-for-israeli-inte...

All those naive political observers missed that in the entire analysis.

 

 

Quinvarius's picture

30 Western intel analysts killed by Russians in Syria:

https://southfront.org/30-foreign-intelligence-officers-israeli-us-turki...

Maybe.  No one is reporting it in the West.  Several foreign presses are.

Scuba Steve's picture

She is sexy? In a kind of ugly monster demon shit-in-pantsuit fuckface libtard murderer lesbian kind of way? ... just asking.

GreatUncle's picture

Hey grab that fucker Cameron and put him on trial for war crimes!

GreatUncle's picture

Yet those pulling the strings still want Clinton.

Her remit is to start WW3. because there is NO OTHER FUCKING REASON TO ELECT HER.

Go on name one ... silence.

Quinvarius's picture

And these same dumfucks are going along with it all in Ukraine, Russia, and Syria.

Son of Captain Nemo's picture

A round of applause to the "Limey" motherfucker partner(s) in crime across the pond that finally admitted aiding and abetting "Simple Sam" in the indiscriminate murder that has left more than 50,000 dead in that Country and millions displaced!...

Can't wait for "We Came... We Saw... He Died"... to acknowledge her war crimes at Hofstra and do the rest of humanity a favor by putting a loaded .357 gun in her mouth and blowing her brains out of the back of her skull in the biggest public show of guilt and remorse of her existence that she and her shameless fellow Langley cabal has committed while she has walked free!...

Plus as an added bonus... Britain!  Are you still awake???...  Thanks for sending weapons to the Zio-Wahabbi motherfuckers that did this!!!

While you are on a "roll" maybe you can bare your soul for killing all those children by proxy with your weapons?!!!

Kidbuck's picture

Welcome to the club, Libya. Our country was also destroyed by wars based on lies and turned into a shit show. I wonder if there is a common denominator?

Thoreau's picture

Thanks, GW. Too bad that most folks don't give a damn about this kind of news/information. The good news is that the calvary has arrived... THE FAMOUS PEOPLE!  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRp1CK_X_Yw

CalifornianSeven's picture

Governance by crisis = The Obama Doctrine

Foreign policy = destabilize the Middle East

Domestic policy = destablize the US & create racial violence, take from the rich - give to the not-so-poor

code word:  Fundamental Transformation

slogan:  Forward

DirtySanchez's picture

I always appreciate the effort, George Washington.

That being said, I am pained to say that if Hillary Clinton unzipped her pants on CNN and whipped out her 12 inch erect black cock and stuck it in Chelsea's ass, half of our retarded country would still vote for her.

We are a nation of moochers and retards, sucking on the tit of the evergrowing intolerant and abusive establishment.

whatamaroon's picture

ohbutthead is pleased to be involved with the 'fundamental' transformation.