Hacking Democracy

Has anyone started organizing non-violent street protests yet? It's probably time. Just sayin'.

+1 Those points reveal of what people are now having to live with.

Tax dodges, well somebody is going to pay but it is certainly not the tax dodgers.

amen brother....

it's amazing how the people who are completely stripped of ethics feel they can claim moral highground on ALL issues, even when the issue is the exposure of their crimes...

Well said. Couldn't have said it better myself.

I just wanted to add that they also are furious on different hackers that hack themselves and their own privacy, and used much energy to point out how illegal and unethical it all is.  The fact that they themselves have spent billions and billions of dollars on hacking programs to monitor all internet accounts and all cell phones in the world around the clock to spy on peoples privacy seems to be quite alreight. Hell they even tapped into the transatlantic cables to hack the internet traffic directly, and they forced themselves admission to private companies network servers.  Yet they blame Putin , Snowden and wikileaks for being the bad guys.  They not only lack moral compasses, they are all sociopaths and perhaps even psykopaths too.  

They call it Cremation of Care - Machiavellian philosophy, with a Satanic twist.

It doesn't look like anyone else is mentioning this so I will post it again further up the thread:

Tha diebold machine wasn't "hacked" as such. They simply adjusted the fractions associated with a yes vote and a no vote. The scam was explained fully here amongst other places:

http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/

You should have added that Brexiters showed up at the polls with their own PENS to mark their ballot. They learned from the Scottish independence referendum that the PENCIL (which was provided) marked ballots can be altered and didn't want to make the same mistake.

Also the other point is ...

The counters are the weak link in the chain, they will know and loads of counters (this I think is what the electoral college was supposed to represent) who know the truth and you just expanded the revelament.

Note:- Only London and Cardiff returned a BREMAIN, the centres of power for stuffing ballot boxes but you could not stuff an extra million votes into Londons box it would be noticed.

Scotland wants out of the UK, so BREMAIN it was although I would not consider IMMEDIATELY joining the EU a good choice.

"[In the UK] the votes are transported and counted in full public view with impartial observers at every step"

This is not true at all. There's a good talk on video by Max Mussen about this, he says he has worked in many elections. It is obvious from Mussen and many other reports that the strict laws of elections (e.g. intact seals on ballot boxes) are not enforced. This is it:

https://youtu.be/yar4PTvj4Bk

The greatest scope for voting fraud is postal votes and here, Moslems in Britain lead the way.

There is corruption and criminality wherever you are, it's just a matter of degree, how far the rot has spread. The typical election worker in Britain, counting the votes, is a teacher, and they are notoriously left-wing.

But in the US, ballot stiffing is the method of choice, and has been practiced for decades. First they would go room to room in the old folks home and bus them to the polls and "help" them cast their ballots. Then when absentee balloting was expanded, they didn't need the busing anymore, and just went room to room helping the elderly and insane complete their absentee ballots and disposing of those that weren't completed for the correct candidate. Somewhere along the way they also not only stepped up voting by the dead but also added the incarcerated or paroled. At the individual level, as more people started owning vacation homes, it facilitated their voting in multiple jurisdictions simultaneously, or enterprising party apparatchiks voting for them. After AL Gore invented the internet in the 90's and Boards of Election started publishing voter rolls online it became practical to identify all those hedgetards who spend election day hiding on their parents' basements couches, and we've started to see more of them vote. This election will be interesting in that regard, to see if in even more states, we start seeing 5-digit cases of voter being denied ballots or issued absentee ballots because they have "already" voted absentee, of course a few of these fuckwits are individuals getting caught trying to commit voter fraud.

So literally the only group of people dumber than the hedgetards who wank to Diebold fantasies are some of the PhDickwads who write papers about voter fraud. As to the former - even the mass fraud allegations in Ohio didn't allege tampering with individual machines, the apparent fraud (if it actually existed) involved manipulating the precinct level counts from late reporting precincts at a central "data processing" facility (read some laptop in a hotel room or something). If it actually happened, backfilling the ballot boxes, whether digital, paper, or even the Rube Goldberg Chicago mechanical monsters is simple process of a corrupt election official pushing the button, scanning the paper, or pulling the lever a few extra times (just like they do when the test machines before the election and before the supposedly reset them).

As to the PhDickwads, when someone writes a scholarly paper that alleges there have been something like only 10 cases of documented voter fraud over the last two election cycles, they are committing academic fraud. You cannot have an advanced degree and plead ignorance the errors in both methodology and presumption. Virginia alone had more than 30 convictions, after the last election, but incuding them would have required an edumacated asswipe to check not only the Federal, but state court dockets, which is actually where most of these cases are tried. Then there's the whole methodology of using single convictions as a proxy for actual single cases of voter fraud. That's deficient on so many levels that I could write another lengthy post just on that.

So in summary - stupid ZH hedgetards masturbating to fantasies of George Soros fucking a Diebold machine... despite internet & video evidence of him and his ilk cutting checks to stuff ballot boxes (for those who cannot be bothered to read court filings). If people get the government they deserve, George Soros deserves to continue stuffing ballot boxes to heart's content.

BTW - I hope this isn't an actual picture of a English ballot box- http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/what-time-polls-open-close-7898374 , because if it is, and the English haven't figured out how to stuff it, then the English now have lower aggregate intellectual capacity than all those sub Saharan African countries with IQ averages between 59 and 69.

The popular vote is irrelevant. The game is to get 270 electors. In every previous election both side have 120-150 locked regardless of the candidates so a US election is realistically a battle for 120-150 electors in battleground states, which often can be swayed by a handful of percentage points, which can be accomplished by targeting a few specific counties in specific state with local officials at least willing to look the other way. And if this election of electors is even close, there is going to be another battle over the four weeks following Nov. 8 where the establishment will maneuver to change the allegiances of the electors. Trump upends the traditional maps and alters the calculus, but it's still calculus.