Assange Lashes Out At America: "Rigged Primary, Rigged Media, Rigged Candidate"

Tyler Durden's picture

After months of exposing damaging internal information from both the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign, much of which actually points to criminal behavior but seemingly has no impact on the polls, Julian Assange has concluded that "There is no US election. There is power consolidation. Rigged primary,
rigged media and rigged 'pied piper' candidate drive consolidation.


Sadly, it is difficult to disagree with the assessment.  That an establishment democratic candidate could endure an extended FBI investigation, in which multiple federal laws were clearly and intentionally broken, and clear evidence of corruption and collusion between the FBI and State Department is mind boggling.  Throw in evidence from WikiLeaks clearly linking the DNC to criminal efforts to incite violence at rallies, numerous examples of pay-to-play activities at the Clinton Foundation, blatant media collusion, etc, etc, and it
actually becomes quite frightening.

And, while no amount of corruption or scandal seems to sway an American electorate that is intent upon driving the bus off the cliff, Assange has promised a "surprise" for Tim Kaine and the "persecuted christian woman", Donna Brazile


And while we certainly look forward to one more "October Surprise," we're sure it's just one more damning piece of information that will be promptly ignored by the complicit "mainstream media", which as Wikileaks itself exposed is nothing but a PR machine for the administration, and an oblivious American electorate. 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
hedgeless_horseman's picture



"I don't care who does the electing, so long as I get to do the nominating."


- Boss Tweed

cayman's picture
Two examples of social mood that reflect the fact that the by-decree, one-system-must-fit-all, federal monopoly on power is tearing the country apart --- only to revert back to the originally intended states-rights model where 50 states compete on virtually everything as part of a never ending experiment to discover a system of government that actually works!
EXAMPLE 1: The two candidates can't even hold it together through a fun charity dinner.  It isn't the candidates; it is the millions and millions of people behind the candidates that each literally despise the other side, because *everything* depends on federal elections now -- the CONCH SHELL (see below).
EXAMPLE 2: Check out how Dennis Miller views this election.  Humor gets pretty serious.  Remember that his is coming from the guy that O'Reilly has on for a laugh!
At 1:00 the context begins. At 2:00 it ramps up... whether the election even matters now...ship has sailed. At 2:50 it gets dark -- feel like an expatriate living in a foreign country that used to be my own country.  The conch shell.
Establishment Dems hate Trump because they lose the conch shell. Establishment Repubs hate Trump because, in their name, he disbands them and returns the power to the states, just like he said regarding Row v Wade.  So they contributes literally zero to his election.
The social mood is screaming that a vote for trump is essentially a vote to end the the entire federal system (except for national defense) and to admit that no single system can ever rule a nation without the other half being miserable and without pervasive nationwide corruption.
nyse's picture

People think Im kidding when I say they dont even bother plugging in the voting machines.

MillionDollarBonus_'s picture

Assange is working for the Russians! Of course he's going to attack Hillary! Don't you fools see what's going on? Our election is being rigged by a hostile foreign nation! Hillary and the moderator in the last debate said that 16 accredited sources have confirmed that Russia is hacking the emails! This is unprecedented, and should eclipse everything else in the news, including the content of the emails, which only plays into Putin's hands! WAKE UP!!

Could Militant Trump Supporters Steal The Election From Hillary?

Bill of Rights's picture

Prove it, and I don't mean your lame ass blog either..

PrayingMantis's picture



... meanwhile, ... "Trump: Hillary Clinton Asked Me to Pardon Her" ... >>> 

Jim Sampson's picture

Heard from a friend that went to the last debate... She said it was really calm, she was expecting the crazy shit like on tv, she asked a cop, "where are all the people with signs yelling?"  She was told, "don't listen to everything you hear on tv."


PrayingMantis's picture



... and talk about lashing, back in Dec 2011, Donald Trump Unloads On NBC's Chuck 'the Fuck' Todd  >>>  ... and Chuck the Fuck humbly apologized :)


Joe Davola's picture

If there is a bombshell in these emails, would it have more disruptive impact released now, or immediately after the election?  What is the goal, destroy one candidate or set fire to the whole charade.  Only Assange knows.

I know, once in power it's impossible to revert, unless like Nixon your side had enough of you.  Which leads me to speculate that the biggest vulnerability isn't the legality of the servers and coverup, but if these emails spill the beans on one of their benefactors.  We laugh about Arkancide, but the players pulling her and Bill's strings are real heavy hitters - you don't play them.

J S Bach's picture

At least this proves that Assange is still alive.

eatthebanksters's picture

I'm hoping that Wikileaks still has the evidence they said they would provide that would "result in a Hillary Clinton indictment." Something tells me that the MSM will make sure it never gets to the public.

All this cybershit stuff going on is just more of Obozo throwing distractions out for his candidate. These guys are so dirty I now automatically think they are behind all of the shit going down for their own nefarious purposes.  Sad that I have gone from trusting my government to despising them...but when Barry lies about so much how can you ever take the guy seriously?

Bastiat's picture

For it to "result in a Hillary Clinton indictment" someone would have to indict her.  Do you think that will happen, regardless of the evidence or crime?  Only if the machine fails to install her.

Creative_Destruct's picture

Yes, and:

..."just one more damning piece of information that will be promptly ignored by the complicit "mainstream media", 

Two things are required for Hillary to actually be subject to justice like a less equal animal:

1) MSM would need to be eliminated.

2) Entire Obama Admin Executive branch eliminated and replaced with people who would indict her.

DREAM ON reasonable people.... nagonna happen.

toro's picture


philipat's picture

Hey toro, previously mofio then santafe then Aristotle of Greece then Gargoyle then bleu then oops then lance-a-lot then most recently Loftie. Looks like Loftie got banned or just outed. I shall miss him! Let’s see how long toro survives, shall we?

You are a serial spammer and a serial pain in the ass. Might I politely suggest that you go fuck yourself? And get a life.

PS. You might have noticed that my attempt to expose you for what you are is always the same. That’s because your Spam is always the same (Using fake links to your BS site which has no connection to your comments; which are deliberately dramatic to mislead people into responding or clicking on the fake link) so it seems only fair that my exposure of your crap should also always be the same. An eye for an eye.

eatthebanksters's picture

I'm hoping that Wikileaks still has the eveidence they say they would provide that would "result in a Hillary Clinton indictment." Something tells me that the MSM will make sure it never gets to the public

All this cybershit stuff going on is just more of Obozo throwing distractions out for his candidate. These guys are so dirty I now automatically think they are behind all of the shit going down for their on nefarious purposes.  Sad that I have gone from trusting my government to despising them...but when Barry lies about so much how can you ever take the guy seriously?

BuddyEffed's picture

There is rigging attempts from both sides of the aisle , Dem and Rep, and most of it chains on up through to oligarchs both domestic and foreign. Israel, Suadis, Russian, Chinese, you name it.

Bay of Pigs's picture

Once the toothpast is out of the tube, it's hard to get it back in

HR Bob Haldeman

There is no going on these leaks. Heads will roll.....eventually.

Joe Davola's picture

Conspirators or accusers, that is the question.

Joe Davola's picture

Gahh, my reply fell prey to the dos attack.

remain calm's picture

Chinese are even saying "It's a rigged erection"

AViewFromDublin's picture

Chinese are even saying "It's a rigged erection"

a 'rigid erection' even lol

Chris Dakota's picture
Chris Dakota (not verified) Bill of Rights Oct 21, 2016 12:23 PM

If the Russians were the hackers they would have gone to the UN Security Counsel because that would be an act of war.

and they didn't, because the leaks are coming from inside the house, so to speak.

DON'T RESPOND TO MillionDollarBonus with that he successfully hijacks every single thread. This is a tactic so that he dominates the entire front page of the forum, nobody talks about the article only responds to him.

Heavily armed police outside Ecuadorian embassy

Twitter, Paypal, Netflix have all been taken down.

EscapeKey's picture

that is, practically, a cut and paste off CTR nonsense on 4chan. 1/10 for sheer laziness.

tmosley's picture

>going to cuckchan


VinceFostersGhost's picture



Oh man......the 7th floor is gonna be.......PISSED!!!

wildbad's picture

i think its important to understand the "pied Piper" meme.  this was an early DNC strategy which selected trump, carson and bernie as the "wish" candidates the DNC would like to see run against their man, Hillary.


The way things went though (Trump kicking serious ass for the past year plus)  demolished that misbegotten plan.


Facit: Trump is not a pied piper candidate.  Trump is the only challenge to a globalist, elitist, establishment cabal which has the extermination of human kind as its highest agenda item.


Trump will win in a landslide.


ps. I'm getting bored with the alternative media even refering to lamestream media as being "obsolete".  They are.  move on.  just ignore them.

Dirtnapper's picture

Clinton's reset button to Putin worked out well, didn't it?

BigAssPete's picture

Please provide one scintilla of proof.  

devnickle's picture

She actually said 17. But hey, who's counting?

chindit13's picture


I went back and replayed the tape of the final debate, when Hillary tried to smear Trump with the Russia meme.  Listen to it closely.  It is typical Clinton speak.  She ALWAYS leaves herself an out with her explanations and insinuations.  She does NOT directly link the hacks of the DNC nor Podesta to Russia.  She only says that 'Russia hacks private US accounts and websites' (of course not her home server---Trump missed that slow pitch), which is like saying a dog bit a man.  They hack, we hack, China hacks, Iran hacks, the BND hacks, 13-year old pimply-faced kids hack.

Hillary could not link the DNC or Podesta hack to Putin or Russia because NOT A SINGLE ONE of the US’ “17” (kind of like Obama’s 56 States) intel agencies has linked Russia to those specific hacks. Keep in mind, too, that Brennan has not accused Russia, Clapper has not accused Russia and Rogers has not accused Russia.  So Hillary's "17" cannot include the CIA, DNI and NSA.  The DIA doesn't count, as their schtick is counting the number of bolts on the skin of an SS-20 missile, and State has an intel arm that analyzes open source data over scones and mocha latte. SO none of the actual intel agencies has accused Russia of the specific hacks Wikileaks is releasing.

The wench thus gets her intended message out, while leaving herself an out, so that she cannot be accused of lying directly.  If someone fact checked and challenged her, she would say, "I did not say those specific hacks; I just said that Russia does hack into US-based systems".

As much as it hurts to do so, go look at that sequence again from the debate.  You'll hate her even more.

Bay of Pigs's picture

AG Loretta Lynch did the same thing when asked who made the ultimate decision to not indict Hillary Clinton. She deferred to the FBI instead, attempting to leave her a way out. So pathetic and disgusting.

DosZap's picture

And then HE punted it back to HER.

 FBI director Comey VIRTUALLY indicted Hillary, said she was guilty with his assessment, and then said WHAT he was ordered to say.

Until that day, his rep was 100% stellar.Tell me his ass and or family was not threatened with being pisadeared.

IndyPat's picture

I thought it was 17 accredited sources?

Did the Girl Scouts of America withdraw their assessment?

What a lie. The leak came from the inside.

The Jaguar's picture

Your parents must be so proud, a retarded troll zombie with no individual thought or capability. Your real name must be Borg as you just don't seem to be able to see the truth, only what the collective hive tells you.

The Jaguar's picture

Also you seem incapable of relaying facts truthfully, the moderator said nothing about anyone confirming the hacking source, Hitlery said that and it is a lie, just like most dems she lies every time she opens the large orafice on her disgusting disgusting plastic face.

aaarealdeal's picture

Hey, Dipshit.  I'd almost vote for Putin before

I would Hillary.

Go. Fuck. Yourself.

Dabooda's picture

More people dislike Clinton and Trump than they do Putin.  A recent NBC/WSJ poll showed Putin to be less disliked (38%) -- in the U.S. -- than Hillary (41%) OR Trump(44%).

(cue the balalaika music . . .)

Don't be mad!

Don't be sad!

Vote for Vlad!

bmr22's picture

I thought it was 17 sources? No way can I believe that now


Clark Griswold's picture

MDB - You are finger puppet on the member of the man.  Please stop posting - it is far too predictably stupid and transparent.  There are trolls and then there is propagandaists - you qualify for, sadly, for the latter.



DjangoCat's picture

Hey, don't tell him to stop.  He's too funny.

East Indian's picture

"Our election is being rigged by a hostile foreign nation!"


American elections cannot be rigged. Obama himself told us so. By saying this, you are casting aspersions on the administration, and you are acting like Trump, who refuses to accept the election results!




moneybots's picture

"Assange is working for the Russians!"


Your best sarc, yet, as you know it is a DNC talking point and nothing more.


"WAKE UP!!"  Great sarc tag line. Needs more exclamation marks, though.

Whiskey Badger's picture

What's the ZH record for down votes?  MDB has gotta have it.  Your racism and bigotry are only surpassed byb your trolling skills.  Hats off to you MDB.

Dr. Bonzo's picture

Hillary and the moderator in the last debate said that 16 accredited sources have confirmed

Emails were retrieved via standard PRISM collection methodology. Last I checked PRISM was run.... urm... through the NSA.

I'm writing Putin in on my ballot. Fuck you.

ThisIsMadness's picture

You mean to say 16 opinionated sources.  Not a single fact supports the Russians are hacking anything "reported" by the "media."