Revealed: Who Gave Democratic Emails to Wikileaks

George Washington's picture

While all of the mainstream media and anonymous CIA sources claim that Russia was behind the hacks of the emails from the Democratic National Committee and top Clinton aide John Podesta, the truth has been revealed to be completely different.

By way of background, top American intelligence veterans say that it was a leak, not a hack. And see this.

Even the head of U.S. intelligence - James Clapper - testified on Monday that the connection between Russia and Wikileaks is weak. And U.S. intelligence agencies are now refusing to brief  the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on whether or not Russia was actually the source of the Wikileaks documents.

And the NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information, who served as the senior technical director within the agency, who managed six thousand NSA employees, the 36-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency and the NSA’s best-ever analyst and code-breaker, who mapped out the Soviet command-and-control structure before anyone else knew how, and so predicted Soviet invasions before they happened (“in the 1970s, he decrypted the Soviet Union’s command system, which provided the US and its allies with real-time surveillance of all Soviet troop movements and Russian atomic weapons”) – told Washington’s Blog that the Democratic emails were leaked by either NSA insiders or DNC insiders.

The former intelligence analyst, British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, and chancellor of the University of Dundee (Craig Murray) revealed earlier this week that the Podesta leak and the DNC leak were leaked by two different insiders, that both of the leakers were Americans with no ties to Russia, and that one was from the American intelligence services.

Subsequently, Murray revealed further details on the leaks.

Specifically, in an interview with Scott Horton on Tuesday, Murray said that – because John Podesta’s company is a registered lobbyist for the Saudi Arabian government  – the NSA and other intelligence agencies were monitoring their emails as a matter of course.

Murray said that an insider from an American intelligence service (read: NSA)  leaked the Podesta emails to Wikileaks. Indeed, an intermediary to the NSA whistleblower handed the emails to Murray in a park in Washington, D.C.

Murray said that Wikileaks head Julian Assange tells him that the leaker of the DNC emails was a DNC insider.

When asked if Seth Rich was the DNC leaker, Murray responded that he doesn’t know … but that it’s possible that Rich was murdered because someone thought that he was the source of the DNC leak.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Reaper's picture

Imagine how stupid to select a political team and remain loyal as they abuse you.

Captain Nukem's picture

In the end, it probably doesn't matter. Trump or no, the Illuminati will find some way to implement their population reduction program by starting WW3 (aka "the Skynet Strategy"). In the end, there will be only the 0.1% and their robot servants. Why bother to control people when you can eliminate them entirely?

They will probably use bioweapons rather than nukes. Much cleaner that way. And then they will only need a small number of UN troops to conduct mop-up operations, mainly in the rural areas. These will probably then form the basis for a few breeding colonies to produce the child sacrifices needed for their New World Religion.

Operation Zephyr: "Change is in the winds."

 

Farqued Up's picture

Nukem- I suspect the 0.1% are scared shitless, if not they are really stupid. They aren't scared of Trump but of the ones that are patriotic Americans that have always worked and produced. I voted for Trump and am expecting nothing out of him. If he would even talk to people like the Goldman Sachs scum, Mitt Romney and put that warmongering weasel Bolton in the cabinet, he isn't what I want. So, good thing that I don't expect anything. Trump reminds me of the commie Posner on Donohue years ago that blurted out that communism is the best system, they just haven't found the right people to administer it yet. That's the same thing that all politicians say, we can slim it and make it more efficient, or as Perot  crowed constantly, "Well, Larry we will just lift up the hood and FIX it". Trump is singing the same shit, we will just do away with Obamacare and offer something better, meaning, more shit socialism with the hood up. Man, I hope he shocks the shit out of me.

There are probably a lot more people than not that are fed up with the tag team Republicrats with no balls. The 0.1% would be advised that real Americans are not going to go along with their sovereignty killing one world bullshit. They won't be protected when they come out of their underground cities, and maybe the military, police, and others may prevent them from even going in. It must have been a beautiful sight when the people in Romania had a show trial for Ceausescu and his wife then killed them, the only communist leaders to be executed in the big fall in 1989. No telling how many tens of thousands they had murdered. That shit could be spreading like a virus. 

The Ingenious Gentleman's picture

To George Washington's blog:

Your third last paragraph is wrong.

"Indeed, the NSA whistleblower handed the emails to Murray in a park in Washington, D.C."

No, as reported on Zerohedge and in your Daily Mail link, they were handed over by "an intermediary".

DuneCreature's picture

Finally! ..... Someone inside the beltway has figured out what goes on in that big black building in the middle of Ft Meade. ... I'll bet the FBI still thinks it's full of space aliens smoking crack and drinking Peach Schnapps on furlough from Area 51.

I still feel a little bad about telling an FBI field agent that at a cookout once. He goes and files a report about it to HQ with his sig on it. He claims it retarded his career advancement and I told him to buy a new bullshit meter or better yet, transfer to IRS enforcement where the Martians are all tax exempt and not so much of his concern.

Live Hard, Things Are Over Compartmentalized When You Can't Find Enough People At Your Parent Agency With Whom You Are Allowed To Talk To Have A Decent Xmas Party, Die Free

~ DC v4.0

kenny500c's picture

No one has ever said these emails were fake, doctored or altered in any way.

So the Democrats are saying the American voters were swayed to vote against Democrats because of the truthful content of these emails. BFD.

11b40's picture

Yes, that.  We should be giving a Medal Of Freedom to whoever gave the info to Wikileaks.  Maybe Trump will give one to Putin.

mary mary's picture

Putin had nothing to do with it.  Nice try, troll.

11b40's picture

Thanks for the education.  

I keep forgetting how many people require the sarc tag.

acetinker's picture

11b40 was here long before I arrived, and is, IMHO not a troll.

While I agree that seniority in and of itself should not be revered for its' own sake, the rules are different here.  The early adopters are ahead of the curve.  The rest of us need to respect that and encourage their input.

K?

11b40's picture

Thanks, Ace.

Per my response to Mary Mary...I guess I just ass-u-me the sarcasm is obvious to most.  Or maybe just getting senile ;-)

acetinker's picture

I'm guilty too.  I ass-u-me that we here have the same level of awareness- so I proceed from that premise with my remarks- but that is not the case, is it?

It's like Rumsfeld (sorta) said, We don't know what we don't know.  But mostly, I just thought Mary Mary's rebuke was un-called for.

Senile, huh?

Shit!

I thought it was just me!

roadhazard's picture

Funny, the names of the "American insiders" are absent. This would go on my fake news page.

ALANBEEKMAN's picture

So much for the 'Peaceful Transfer of Power'...

My ass...

DosZap's picture

Did you really expect a serial liar to be honest?.

Hope and CHANGE is the only thing HE didn't lie about, HEAVY on the CHANGE.

MrSteve's picture

http://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=738

--with the CIA refusing to brief Congressional Oversight Committees, how are the no-security-clearance Electoral College voter-persons going to get to hear the scoop on Rooskie electioneering interference?? With the FBI and others , like ODNI, pointing to no evidence, maybe the CIA has gone quiet to avoid further embarassment?

I don't think the typical federal oath taker is a stupid political chump and no one should assume they don't take their oath very, extremely seriously. You have to factor that integrity issue into the reports we get. The political appointees at the top of these agencies are another factor altogether.

azusgm's picture

We do all remember which former president used to be the director of the CIA, don't we?  Surely, there must be some of his accolytes who have risen to occupy high positions currently in that organization.

Bush/Clinton uniparty.

conspicio's picture

Rich was talking on the phone with his girlfriend [ed. keep in mind this was 4:20am] when she heard noise on Rich's end of the line. He is reported to have told his girlfriend not to worry about it.

Police found him 4 minutes later [he was transported and later died at 6am at the hospital] and there was evidence there had been a struggle. His hands were bruised, his knees were bruised, his face bruised, he had two shots to his back, and nothing was taken. Acoustic Shotspotter technology was what alerted the police to respond. WItnesses heard (but no one saw) the attack. His watchband was torn but not broken.

Currently over $150K in reward for info...and so far, nada. What happened from when he left Lou's City Bar at 1:45am, where he said he was headed to The Wonderland Ballroom, to when he was gunned down remains unclear.

And by the way - Where is Eric Braverman??? Poof - vanished!

RagaMuffin's picture

With war and peace hanging in the balance, with "fake" news outlets, thus the First ammendment ,in the cross hairs, the "leakers" will have to be revealed..........

mary mary's picture

In the few States in which Democrats won, it WOULD make sense for Democratic Electors to cast their votes for Bernie Sanders instead of Hillary Clinton.

That would be an effective way for them to protest the REAL election hacks: those Hillary and Debbie Wassmerman Schultz (Miami cough cough CIA cough expatriate "Cubans" cough Mafia cough Vatican) made in the Democratic Primaries.

konadog's picture

Yea. I like Tulsi Gabbard. I often disagree with her, but she's former military and she's genuine. That puts her in rarefied air in the US Congress full of uni-party (Depublican and Republicrat) swamp rats.

PirateOfBaltimore's picture

Pretty sure Tony Podesta is a registered agent for Saudis.  He's the lobbyist.

mary mary's picture

Tony "Hands" Podesta.  aka Tony "the Hands" Podesta.  aka Tony "Clean Hands" Podesta.

azusgm's picture

I almost would hate for Wikileaks to confirm or deny if certain dead persons were leakers.

Wouldn't want the Luciferians to develop a plan to kill until confirmation that they had gotten the right person(s).

koncaswatch's picture

Thanks again GW. Your constant kicking over of rocks hiding snakes is appreciated.

Osmium's picture

Waiting for Wolf Blitzer to lead with this story, or not.  That guy is a jackass.

mary mary's picture

Wolf always looks like he's asking his producers: "Did I say that right?", "Was that what you wanted?", "If that wasn't so good, I can try again.""

thebigunit's picture

Just wondering . . .

When asked if Seth Rich was the DNC leaker, Murray responded that he doesn’t know … but that it’s possible that Rich was murdered because someone thought that he was the source of the DNC leak.

Is there enough linkage or "circumstantial evidence" of a crime to justify a criminal investigation by "the authorities" whoever they may be?

whatamaroon's picture

Seth Rich was offed before the podesta files came out. So somebody knew something.

azusgm's picture

The last Podesta email was from May 25th. Wikileaks needed time to go through them and index them before releasing the first batch on July 22th. Seth Rich was killed on July 10th.

You are right. Somebody at least suspected something.

This Prof. Murray must not understand how vicious these people are. Who on earth can afford to protect him now?

A. Boaty's picture

“Some circumstantial evidence is very strong, as when you find a trout in the milk."

– H.D. Thoreau

Caleb Abell's picture

So far, the only item of circumstantial evidence they found next to Seth Rich's body was a partially eaten piece of cheese pizza.

Billy the Poet's picture

I'm a fan but was unfamiliar with that quote. Thanks for posting it.

worbsid's picture

No, it was a clean hit.  Just like we do not expect the Russians to be stupid, don't expect the people who call these hits to be stupid either.  Look at the Clinton record, whoever is working for them is very deep and very smart.

azusgm's picture

I wonder if the Clinton's own this coroner like he owned the one in Arkansas.

Is there any way to find out who investigated this assassination and called it a robbery? Somebody signed on the dotted line.

Frito's picture

I would not be surprised if it came out that whoever signed off on the "investigation" of Seth Richs' death happened to have an unfortunate accident shortly afterwards.

chunga's picture

Seth Rich makes sense because whoever leaked this would likely be dead, and he is. It also makes sense that whoever saw or perhaps copied Anthony Weiner's laptop files is also dead. And that would also explain Comey's reopening of the investigation into Hill'rey's conduct, then the bizarre, wacky about face on it shortly after. They're dead too.

Oldwood's picture

Is it not odd that they claim the Russian influenced the election in Trumps favor at the same time they are claiming Hillary won the popular vote? Were all the emails strictly to bring down the blue wall to win the electoral vote? Are the Russians that inscrutable that they can be so precise in their efforts to know that these truthy emails would only pervert Wisconsin, Michigan and PA to support Trump while Hillary won so many popular votes in other areas? 

Its so damned hard to take any of this seriously when any rational mind sees right through it, but then again, this is why we have struggled for so many years against it. IT DOESN'T MATTER if it is irrational nonsensical bullshit. The fact that it is so crazy is what disarms us, makes us assume that it would never happen...and then it happens. Progressives are not necessarily smart than us, they simply are unafraid having a sense they have nothing to lose. And we defer to their each demand out of fear primarily of being called names. We have given them courage through our timidness.

 

philipat's picture

It's straight out of the Goebbels playbook: "If you tell a lie so outrageous and repeat it often enough, eventually the people will believe it". It only it weren't for that pesky "Fake News" nowadays...

sushi's picture

Got to agree with Oldwood.

 

1) The MSM spent the duration of the election going full out in support of Clinton, pretty much ignored the content of the email releases, and devoted significant time to putting down Trump and belittling both him and his supporters.

2) The so called alt-right media gets scapegoated as it was the only media forum taking an objective look at HRC, at Trump, and at the Wikileaks material. Even ZH had negative reporting on Trump as part of what comes across as a reasonable balance in reporting and permitting the reader audient to make up their own mind.

3) Every survey of public opinion that I am aware of demonstrated that a significant proportion of the electorate, upwards of 60% or more, had signifcant distrust in HRC. That is what happens when you lie to the public and then lie some more to cover the lies told previously. This antipathy towards HRC was not shifted by all the positive MSM reporting boosting HRC and avoidance of any of her negatives.

4) So a fully informed public, aware of the accusations agains Russia, aware of all the potential negatives of Trump, aware of the constant positve MSM coverage of a serial liar still voted to throw the bums out as is their right under the constitution. But the 1%, the deep state, the elite refuse to acknowledge the outcome as it does not fit the agenda of the 1%.

My hunch is that Trump may turn out to be one of the better pst war presidents the US has had. Certainly far better than the present incumbent who promised a lot and then enhanced his golf game.

 

 

Meatier Shower's picture

As one poster pointed out in the comments of the Daily Mail article:

Seth Rich was executed in early July. No DNC emails were dated after his death (the latest was May 25, 2016).

Big Whoop's picture

It doesn't matter whether Seth Rich was the right person or not. They needed to make an example out of someone. Those are Podesta rules.

mary mary's picture

Podesta, Hillary, Bill, Mafia, Mossad, Vatican, Rothschild, only one set of rules.  Everyone who knows, knows the rules.