How We Become Slaves Of "The System"

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Bob Livingston via PersonalLiberty.com,

Almost everything you think and do is against your best interest and you don’t even realize it. It’s planned that way.

The state seeks absolute control of your mind, body and spirit. Can the state succeed? It has, but only a precious few ever know.

Your mind and your thoughts are not your own. Almost every thought you have channels you toward the state.

By the time a child grows up and goes through the public (non)education system, he or she has no thoughts of his or her own. By the time that person is finished with college, the system has sealed his or her thought processes so that nothing is questioned. The imperative to inquire beyond what comes from the propaganda media and our leaders is gone.

Our minds are so smug in darkness and organized confusion that we are complete automatons. Our ego, our individuality, is completely excised and we are completely transferred into the state organism and group thought. Any deviation from the system by anyone is met with hostility by friends and neighbors.

By this we become locked into a system based only on conventional wisdom.  Conventional wisdom is what everybody knows. It is the court history (faux history) we receive in school and through the controlled media, repeated ad nauseum.

Conventional wisdom is based on confusion and disinformation. It has a crowding-out effect in our thought processes that stifles inquiry. In other words, conventional wisdom programs us to reject any information or thought not in harmony with our preconditioning and experience. It is called cognitive dissonance.

The more one is formally educated, the more he/she is locked into the system mindset.  (Why do you think there is such a push for everyone to receive a college education whether a person is so inclined or not?)

I myself went through four years of college, worked on a master’s degree, and attended law school. What a pity! It took valuable time and money for me to pay for the brainwash. It took years to get over it. I had to completely erase this education foolishness before I could begin to have half sense. My inquiring attitude and much, much reading helped me escape the programmed maze that entrapped me. The many conflicts and confusion was emotionally and financially costly.

Not even your body is your own.

A brand new baby gets vaccinations before it leaves the hospital and the parents are glad. They don’t question what’s in the vaccines or what they’re for.

There’s even now a push to begin vaccinating babies in the womb. As it is, the state begins to seize an infant’s body the first day of its life. It is being prepared for death the day it is born. Then as many as 50 more vaccinations come before the end of high school. All is done in the name of health and for the good of society. It’s all for profit of the giant pharmaceuticals enforced by the political system. The parents believe that it’s good.

There are many knowledgeable people who are against compulsory vaccinations simply because it is a violation of medical freedom. But the problem goes much deeper. It is at the heart of the survival of the system.

Then there is an organized system of sickness called healthcare. This system must have an endless supply of bodies — yours.

Thousands of tests, biopsies, sonograms, catheterizations, etc., etc., leading to making huge profits through drugs, surgery, radiation, etc., leading to the general demise of the natural immune system guaranteeing sickness and death — yours.

Individual responsibility for one’s own health in America is unthinkable and almost nonexistent. It was so planned. They need and want your body. It is huge profits for the system.

Beyond that, vaccines and the sickness care system are about a population control system based on the cold reality of the survival of the money (credit) creation monopoly that rules the world. Consumers will and must die. The push for universal vaccinations is not ideological fantasy. It is cold-blooded conspiracy to control population. California has mandatory vaccination and has eliminated both the religious and philosophical exemption. As California goes, so goes the nation.

When you understand the money system you will know for certain why population control has now changed from an urgency to a priority of the establishment.

Those of you new to Personal Liberty® and reading some of these things for the first time may be shocked and asking, “What do vaccines, healthcare, the money system and population control have in common?”

In a few words, money creation (money creation is credit creation) is the exclusive monopoly of the central bank. In the U.S., this is the Federal Reserve and Federal Reserve banks.

All wealth flows to the creators of credit. But a credit creation monetary system cannot exist without regulation. Regulation is absolutely essential in all areas of life. In America, do we have regulation? In spades.

Specific for this discussion is the subject of population regulation or population control. A credit-based monetary system will break down if it gets more consumers than producers. As our population gets older and “top heavy,” consumption exceeds production and, through welfare and social security payments, wealth reverses from the money (credit) creators to the consumers or nonproducers. This cannot be allowed over time.

Therefore ways — benevolent ways of course, as they cannot just vaporize you when you reach a certain age, a la “Logan’s Run”  — must be found to get us to expire when we retire. We have many population control mechanisms in place, including mass medication with drugs and fluoride in our drinking water.

And one of the most sinister and disguised population controls in place is mass inoculations and vaccinations. When our children are vaccinated, there is a certain percentage who die as a result, and many are disabled in various ways for life. However, the most insidious part of it is the development of degenerative diseases much later in life, say about in the 50s and early 60s, at about retirement age.

Human liberty and personal survival in our time must originate in truth no matter how incredible and shocking to our conditioned minds. Governments control the public mind with disinformation and confusion. No modern government could exist for 24 hours if it told the people the truth.

Of course, the establishment news will label these truths as “fake news.” Most of the readers — due to cognitive dissonance — will label this as “conspiracy theory.”

Both are code words designed to make you and keep you as slaves to “The System.”

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Due North's picture

By surrendering ones Liberty for security.

Motasaurus's picture

This entire think piece is a steaming pile of shit and I would have thought more hedgers would be able to see it for what it is.
Infant mortality is way down and average lifespan is way up. This is almost entirely thanks to vaccinations.
The logic of the piece is self contradictory on this point. It complains of the ageing population being a drain on the credit system (which it absolutely is) and yet claims in the same breath that vaccinations are being used to kill off the young (the opposite of what you want to do if you're trying to save the credit system which requires growth).

Be opposed to compulsory vaccinations on the grounds of personal liberty, not on some pseudo philosophical argument from an absolute crack pot.

froze25's picture

Hard to say, public clean water and good personal higene became available before vacancies became popular and infant mortality rates were already declining. Now don't get me wrong I do believe that vaccine technology has its place. However we have gone from basic vaccines that were dead virus to engineered live virus vaccines. Autism has sky rocketed. Japan had the MMR vaccine noticed autism was going through the roof. The government of Japan now requires that the Measles Mumps and Rubella vaccine is given separately and spaced out no less than 3 months apart. The result is a major drop in the cases of diagnosed autism.  You had the recent "Mexican flu" in 2009, the one that they tried to fear the population into getting the rushed experimental vaccine and there was a push to make it mandatory. Well so many people had adverse effects from it and many deaths so quickly many people simply wouldn't take it and many countries banned it. In fact you had the fewest regular flu shots taken that year and guess what we had the fewest cases of regular flu that year.  So while the science is solid for why vaccines work, what they gave us in the 50's is not what we are given today.  Why is it that only in the US you can't sue a Vaccine manufacturer for damages? That happened in the early 80's by an act of Congress.  This is who you go to for damage compensation by a vaccine adverse effect, the Government https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/

This is a good article on how the CDC gets the flu vaccine wrong every year by their own admission, yet it is pushed on us like crazy

http://www.naturalnews.com/047890_flu_vaccines_cdc_apology_medical_fraud...

SmackDaddy's picture

The vaccine thing seem to get a lot of attention, so I'll leave that alone.  

Just empirically, I seem to notice a lot of the autism and other issues seem to be when HPV addled liberal whores decide to have their first kid when theyre 40.

Polemos's picture

Since the universe is governed by the minimum total potential energy principle, free will does not exist.

The continuum's matter is being attracted to its future configuration characterized by the minimum total potential energy. This attraction exerted from the future manifests itself as "your" desires.

The most negative total potential energy, to which the world is being attracted, is an attribute of a debt-bound state.

The word "total" in the name of the minimum total potential energy principle implies that the principle is holistic, nonanalysable. Mankind's debt enslavement is not caused by any identifiable factors and thus is unstoppable.

Twee Surgeon's picture

You are more full of shit than a Christmas Turkey, enjoy the ride though, it might be your last one.

Polemos's picture

Yes, I have digested much information before feeding it into your big mouth.

froze25's picture

If what you say is true than how is it possible to simply live off the land and not use debt money?  How was it possible for the US to use debt free money up until 1913? Because of those possibilities and the ability for the human mind to imagine those possibilities you theory is, in my opinion wrong.

Polemos's picture

Debt money provides a short-term boost at the cost of a subsequent depression. When the pace of historical changes is slow, as it was before 1913, the use of debt money is not expedient. But history is exponentially accelerating. When the speed of historical changes reaches a critical threshold, as it was in 1913, short-termism prevails. If one country forbears from financial doping, its adversaries will use it and win the race. Remember that the founding of the Fed coincided with the beginning of World War I. And the intensity of international competition has not abated since then.

HopefulCynic's picture

You are ignoring the multiple possibilities on teh way down the hill, which create options, which leads tio the excercise of Free Will. Predestination deos nto mean there is no free will, we all knwo the Universe will end within this principle in avery slow cold process, but the in between you forget, and by simple use of a choice by free will, you negate the possibility of the whole existance being holistic. Yes the Big Crunch will happen accordding to what we know of physics, that does not mean that consciusness is inconsequential, specially since you are unable to view it holisticly, because of the mere existence of consciousness, Free Will is a reality. 

 

Simply put by being able to willfully switch thoughts, from let's say a very sensoual fantasy to meditation of a theological aargument, you are excercisng free will. What you are basically saying is that is impossible because every sensusl fantasy leads to orgasm thus the end of the thought by no means of excercisng your free will and that is BS. 

Polemos's picture

HopefulCynic: "we all knwo the Universe will end within this principle in avery slow cold process"

On the contrary, we know that the continuum's matter will vanish in an exponentially accelerating hot process.

The minimum total potential energy principle dictates that 13.8 billion years ago, the proton had an infinitely big radius, so that its potential energy was maximal (i.e., zero), while its actual energy was minimal (i.e., zero). Such a zero-frequency proton is indistinguishable from empty space and thus does not exist. The proton borrows itself into existence by shrinking and thus becomes hotter. The hotter the proton becomes, the faster it radiates the borrowed energy into the expanding ambient vacuum. That is why the interval between the proton's shrinkings becomes ever shorter. The protons we consist of are smaller and hotter than they were 10 years ago, and their temperature continues to increase:

All change is relative. The universe is expanding relatively to our common material standards; our material standards are shrinking relatively to the size of the universe. The theory of the "expanding universe" might also be called the theory of the "shrinking atom". <...>
Let us then take the whole universe as our standard of constancy, and adopt the view of a cosmic being whose body is composed of intergalactic spaces and swells as they swell. Or rather we must now say it keeps the same size, for he will not admit that it is he who has changed. Watching us for a few thousand million years, he sees us shrinking; atoms, animals, planets, even the galaxies, all shrink alike; only the intergalactic spaces remain the same. The earth spirals round the sun in an ever?decreasing orbit. It would be absurd to treat its changing revolution as a constant unit of time. The cosmic being will naturally relate his units of length and time so that the velocity of light remains constant. Our years will then decrease in geometrical progression in the cosmic scale of time. On that scale man's life is becoming briefer; his threescore years and ten are an ever?decreasing allowance. Owing to the property of geometrical progressions an infinite number of our years will add up to a finite cosmic time; so that what we should call the end of eternity is an ordinary finite date in the cosmic calendar. But on that date the universe has expanded to infinity in our reckoning, and we have shrunk to nothing in the reckoning of the cosmic being.
We walk the stage of life, performers of a drama for the benefit of the cosmic spectator. As the scenes proceed he notices that the actors are growing smaller and the action quicker. When the last act opens the curtain rises on midget actors rushing through their parts at frantic speed. Smaller and smaller. Faster and faster. One last microscopic blurr of intense agitation. And then nothing.
—Eddington, Arthur. The Expanding Universe. Cambridge University Press, 1933, pp. 90–92

From the perspective of such a shrinking proton, the virtual (i.e., too narrow and short-lived to be traversable) wormholes, of which the ambient negative-energy vacuum consists, become ever more wide and long-lived, and eventually become traversable, which allows of psychokinesis, teleportation and time travel during the ensuing millennium.

froze25's picture

What you are stating is only one school of thought on the subject and certainly not a fact.

Polemos's picture

The minimum total potential energy principle is universally accepted. It is the foundation of all science.

NobodyNowhere's picture

"Since the universe is governed by the minimum total potential energy principle, free will does not exist"

In that principle, the energy of the prior state in excess of the later minimum is "lost as kinetic energy"  - which is the analog of something you are calling "free will"

Polemos's picture

When a volume of gas becomes self-gravitationally compressed and thus descends to a more negative potential energy (i.e., to a deeper debt), the kinetic energy of its molecules increases because the gas becomes confined/debt-bound. One half of this borrowed actual energy is radiated away into the ambient vacuum, and becomes redshifted out of existence by the vacuum's expansion:

After each infinitesimal step of collapse the star has to wait until it has radiated away half of the released gravitational energy before it can continue to contract.
—Böhm-Vitense, Erika. Introduction to Stellar Astrophysics Cambridge University Press, 1992, p. 29

Thus, the negative potential energy (debt bondage) of a system always exceeds the system's positive actual energy (free will). And each infinitesimal step of the system's self-gravitational collapse makes this deficit of free will deeper.

illuminatus's picture

Wrong, the universe is nothing but energy in one form or another, Your theory is bogus. You are falling prey to a common trap of the mind which always likes positive/negative dichotomies and ignores the fact that in reality things or concepts are never ' this or that', but this and that, or on a more wholistic level neither.

Polemos's picture

The universe is a flux. Without a gradient from a positive pressure to a negative pressure, there would be no flux.

proV's picture

That universe is (in) a flux implies it is itself unstable to hold itself as it is, it is pretending to be something it is not, so it is not a legal system you can trust and rely on.

From theological point of view the sages say God (the ultimate truth) can not be percepted via senses, it can only be known. Senses offer only illusions of existence, they are the result of abandonment of direct knowledge of ONE for a percepted illusion of infinite - the "universe". They offer us this "flux", which is a movement of nothing, pretending to be some-thing.

Free will is that which is not bound to this perceived universe, perception is not a fact, it is a choice.

 

Polemos's picture

The unmoved mover of the universal flux is the gradient of total potential energy.

The unmoved mover is also known as "eternity", "the world spirit", and "the world will".

Being eternal and unmoved is the opposite of freedom. Therefore, "free will" is an oxymoron.

proV's picture

It is not oxymoron, it is oxymoron only in your logic. Why do you think you would even want flux? To be in a flux is to be separated from that potential that attracts you and you believe you must have to come back to a perfect state. This is the very opposite of freedom, because you are 1. conditioned by that outside entity and 2. still in a unperfect state. This is suffering.

The unmoved mover is in a pefect state. It is wrong to define it as that which moves things and wrong to define it as that which does not move things. Because from point of view of a unmoved mover nothing is ever moving, everything is only pretending to be in a movement.

Polemos's picture

The unmoved mover is the continuum's gravitational potential field, existing as a centripetal potential flow of the vacuum that conserves and thus intensifies its angular momentum to the Planck quantum of action, at which moment actual vortices known as protons become born in the potential flow.

Force in such a potential field is a flux in the sense of a mechanical driving agent.
—Ziegler, Franz. Mechanics of Solids and Fluids. Springer, 1995, p. 167

The non-viscous flow of the vacuum should be potential (irrotational).
—Volovik, G. E. The Universe in a Helium Droplet. Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 60

Initially, the low-frequency protons (each miles across) occupy the entire volume of the continuum, without any gaps of negative-energy potentially flowing vacuum between them, so that the potential flow does not exist.

Protons undergo a 13.8-billion-year-long exponentially accelerating shrinkage, so that rapidly growing gaps of negative-energy potentialy flowing vacuum appear between them. The shrinking protons heat up to ever higher frequencies and radiate their angular momentum into the ambient vacuum, whose expansion redshifts the angular momentum and thus deactualizes it. Eventually, all protons vanish, after which the 13.8-billion-year-long exponentially accelerating cycle begins anew.

Thus the centripetal potential flow of eternity excretes its conserved and intensified angular momentum in the form of protons and then reabsorbs the angular momentum emitted by the shrinking protons. Angular momentum exerts rotational decoherence and thus is synonymous with entropy, also known as freedom. Freedom (angular momentum) is the dirt (incoherence) from which the centripetal potential flow of the vacuum purifies itself.

filosofo's picture

Personal liberty to be against compulsory vaccination.... difficult point. Two issues: one, parents arent deciding not to be vaccinated themselves. They are alredy protected. It is their babys lifes they would freely choose to risk, not sure that really exists the rigth to hurt you baby. isssue number two, it doesn just affect your baby, as non vaccinated children will not only suffer the disseases but also transmit it to other children, pregnant women... Anyway,  upvoted your comment cause essentially agree with your evaluation of this text.

HopefulCynic's picture

Neglecting is a form of ill treatment, but it is not a positive action, so I would nto categorise it as hurting the baby, specially since you do not knwo if the baby will get natural immunities, hereditary immunities, or will ever be in a position to be infected bty any disease, specially after the disease is mostly eradicated. 

 

I do believe in vaccination but not in all vaccines, if there is a percentage above .1 percent that a child will get extremely adversely affected, I'd like to think twice before allowing a child I am responsible of from getting that particular vaccine.  Let's not be coy, vaccines have been used for population control, there is a vaccine for HPV that is being administered in several third world countries and some states in the US, that have a very large percentage of creating ovarian cancer, and many other adverse reproductive effects. This is no coincidence, specially if Soros is involved, so no my daughter (if I had one) would never receive that vaccine.

 

But not because an article is flawed I will dismiss it entirely either, I like to think for myself and although I am not relativistic, I can pick things I can use , or think about those thing I disagree with as well. I have no cognitive dissonance which is real, I do use my acceptance or understanding that I do not know everything and is impossible for me to ascertain without error that I have the whole Truth when I can barely get glimpses of it. 

froze25's picture

The fact that the inserts that come with vaccines list the adverse effects that may happen from them is an admission that they can be harmful. Only animals don't get a choice in medical treatment and we aren't animals. I am not a male, I am a man. The language matters.

TwelveOhOne's picture

Not only that, but -- the move towards "vaccinating the unborn" seems to me to be a method to hide the destructive aspects of the vaccines.

"Your child was born with that deformity/low IQ/whatever; we accept no liability", the doctor/industry will proclaim.

JohninMK's picture

Very perceptive comment.

Thanks

HopefulCynic's picture

Neglecting is a form of ill treatment, but it is not a positive action, so I would nto categorise it as hurting the baby, specially since you do not knwo if the baby will get natural immunities, hereditary immunities, or will ever be in a position to be infected bty any disease, specially after the disease is mostly eradicated. 

 

I do believe in vaccination but not in all vaccines, if there is a percentage above .1 percent that a child will get extremely adversely affected, I'd like to think twice before allowing a child I am responsible of from getting that particular vaccine.  Let's not be coy, vaccines have been used for population control, there is a vaccine for HPV that is being administered in several third world countries and some states in the US, that have a very large percentage of creating ovarian cancer, and many other adverse reproductive effects. This is no coincidence, specially if Soros is involved, so no my daughter (if I had one) would never receive that vaccine.

 

But not because an article is flawed I will dismiss it entirely either, I like to think for myself and although I am not relativistic, I can pick things I can use , or think about those thing I disagree with as well. I have no cognitive dissonance which is real, I do use my acceptance or understanding that I do not know everything and is impossible for me to ascertain without error that I have the whole Truth when I can barely get glimpses of it. 

filosofo's picture

Yes, that is what Cynism was about. And yes,  to some extent the truth is elusive...  The problem is, in many cases, it is a very easy way of discarding everything that one doesnt know as unknowable. Egos feel great and untouched  if "no one really knows nothing". But, some people do know things. For example, your info about HPV is completely false. If you really want to know  about that particular virus, what it does, and in what context the vacine is useful you will easily find out. 

Philthy_Stacker's picture

All viruses can be eradicated with colloidal silver. I just cured my buddy's pneumonia with direct inhalation of Sovereign 10ppm, after 3 years and several anti-bios and steroids. Coughed up some junk after 2 mins and hasn't had an event since. Shortness of breath gone.

HPV doesn't stand a chance against silver! Any virus or bacteria, when administered to properly, at dosage, will be completely killed off by AG particulate (Colloidal Silver).

And if you think I'm full of shit, try it fool. Blew my mind!

TwelveOhOne's picture

I concur, colloidal silver works wonders (when I remember to use it!!!).

Philthy_Stacker's picture

You nailed it. "parents aren't deciding not to be vaccinated themselves. They are already protected."

That's because they were 'force vaccinated' before their parents had ANY facts as to the ingredients and/or
side effects of said vaccine and are not necessarily protected.
I would be inclined (in this world of massive disinformation), to refuse any treatment or action that didn't possess a great percentage of factual information regarding it's efficacy. In other words, listing EVERY molecule in the treatment.

So, while I am amiable to "naturally derived" treatments for any ill, I would need a degree in molecular biology to endorse any modern treatment, drug or vaccine.

Conclusion, I don't trust any motherfucker that puts shit in my drink and  then tells me it's "good for me."

We are being 'roofied' by those who would control us. Get a clue and make sure you know EVERY ingredient in the shit you put in your child's body. This goes for food too. And toothpaste, mouthwash, drinking water (chlorine & flouride), makeup, lotions, dog food, clothing, cigarettes (honorable mention in this list) ...

Don in Odessa's picture

Read it again doofus. The article does not say vaccinations intent is to kill off children. What it says is, "When our children are vaccinated, there is a certain percentage who die as a result, and many are disabled in various ways for life. However, the most insidious part of it is the development of degenerative diseases much later in life, say about in the 50s and early 60s, at about retirement age."

Also, average lifespan took a step back recently: http://www.wsj.com/articles/life-expectancy-for-white-americans-declines... But you are right. It is counterproductive to shorten lifespans if the goal is to make money. One would want to increase life expectancy while at the same time increasing chronic, incurable but treatable disease. The latter being exactly what we have seen. Whether that fact is caused by vaccinations is questionable, but debatable.

HopefulCynic's picture

There is also a correlation between some vaccines, use of hormonal contraceptives and long term effects on fertility in women. The data (not the interpretation) can be taken directly form the CDC website. 

Lyman54's picture

Vaccinations are an interesting topic.  Most of them are not even needed.  Chicken pox, wooping cough, measles vaccines are a waste of time and money.  The HPV vaccines is the biggest scam of all.  They had a program in Africa to vaccinate for tetanus.  After doing the vaccinations they noticed that in areas where no vaccinations had taken place the incidence of tetanus cases was no different in areas where no vaccine had been given.

They did titer tests and found the majority of people allready had anti-bodies to tetanus even though they had never recieved a vaccine.

Ignorance is bliss's picture

According to the New England journal of Medicine: The U.S. Is ranked #1 in healthcare spending. The U.S. Ranks #37 in overall quality of care and is ranked #39 in infant mortality. The U.S. Ranks 43rd for adult female mortality, 42 for adult male mortality, and 36 for life expectancy. There were a total of 191 nations studied.

RedBaron616's picture

Tell your vaccine success stories to the parents of the formerly normal kids that are now permanently damaged because the state believes it owned their children.

CosmicSauce's picture

If you do a little research into what the govt is doing to social security/pension plans/401k/retirement benefits/etc, you'll see this article is more spot on than your complaining.

 

And your kneejerk response was predicted...

duo's picture

Since every kid with autism removes two productive adults from the "economy", it flies in the face of "producers vs consumers" rationale.

Now if flu vaccines contained some sort of genetic time-bomb...let's hope it doesn't turn out like "World War Z".

The central planners's picture

The redshields has us all covered, trust them. The new founder fathers.

Yen Cross's picture

  No baby of mine will ever be born in a hospital.

Manipuflation's picture

You got one knocked up or what?

bloofer's picture

I highly recommend home birth. I admit that some of my kids were born in a hospital (a horrible, crappy birth experience), but the last three were born at home.

SmackDaddy's picture

I'm glad that your experience was good.  But a home birth would have been fatal for my wife and first child....

Colonel's picture

Just don't let CPS (Child "Protective" "Services") know about that or you'll quickly find out how much of a slave you really are.

Colonel Klink's picture

Good luck with that. I've been pissed off against the system since I was in my early 20's. Hate bullshit government rules and regulations like no other.

Fuck'em all!

inosent's picture

great article.