How To Predict The Behavior Of Globalists

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Brandon Smith via,

In my last article, 'How Globalists Predict Your Behavior', I outlined the primary method globalists use to measure public consent, or, public dissent. The use of macro-analytics and the hyper-monitoring of web traffic is a powerful tool at the disposal of the establishment for gauging shifts in public consciousness in real time.

For example, in early 2016 the elites were entirely aware of the rise of conservative and sovereignty movements in the U.S. and Europe. In fact, the dangers of growing “populism” were all that elitists and their publications talked about for the first six months of the year. At first, this notion seemed a little odd to me. Generally, when globalists are attempting to manage public opinion, they are careful not to reveal the slightest hint that conservative movements exist beyond an “extremist fringe”. They certainly never suggest that there is a massive undercurrent of nationalism ready to topple the globalist structure.

In fact, whenever such movements do arise the establishment is swift to obstruct them or co-opt them. I witnessed this first hand during the Ron Paul campaign in 2008 and 2012 – the mainstream deliberately refused to acknowledge Ron Paul's existence, because attacking him repeatedly would have been a zero sum strategy that would have given him greater public attention and free publicity.

I saw it during the Neo-con co-option of the Tea Party, a movement that I was involved in long before Fox News latched onto it and long before mainstream RINO Republicans not only jumped on the bandwagon but hijacked the horse. In a matter of months the Tea Party became a defunct entity, a shell of its former self. Luckily, most liberty activists simply left it behind and started their own separate groups and projects rather than being absorbed into the Neo-con fold.

I also saw establishment interference on a local and state level during elections in Montana. An associate of mine was running for state office on a liberty platform and was doing rather well in the polls. He was approached by a contingent of political elites running as Republicans who told him in no uncertain terms that he could run on any platform and use any rhetoric he wanted, but if he won, he would be required to follow THEIR direction. They even encouraged him to continue arguing for constitutional government in his speeches and debates, because they felt this was the best way to “sell” his candidacy. But when all was said and done, he was supposed to stab his constituency in the back and take orders from the party leadership.

The point is, the elites dominate the political system. Nothing happens within it without their say. So, for those same elites to suddenly and openly suggest that “populist movements” were threatening to overtake the world and destroy the global economy was suspicious, to say the least.

In order to predict the behavior of globalists and the outcome of future economic and political events, it is important to understand certain dynamics. As just described, the establishment has a stranglehold on the political system. Party politics are a sham built around the false left/right paradigm. However, certain new dynamics are developing, and you must be able to track them.

The best way to do this is to watch what globalists say within their own publications. They often reveal their intentions directly or indirectly. In many cases I think in their arrogance they assume that the masses are too stupid to read these publications and grasp what is being said.

The most important element of predicting globalist actions is to know what they ultimately want; to know their ultimate goals. If you know the specifics of what any group or individual desperately wants, those people become highly predictable, because there are only so many useful paths to get to any goal.

I have used this method to great effect over the years, so I am not merely presenting a theory, I have concrete successes to back my position.

For example, just in the past couple of years I correctly predicted the Federal Reserve taper of QE, I predicted the inclusion of China in the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights years in advance, I predicted the exact timing of the first Fed rate hike, I predicted the success of the Brexit referendum when most of the world and the liberty movement said it was never going to happen, I predicted that the Saudi 9/11 bill would pass, that Barack Obama would veto it and that congress would override his veto, I predicted that Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic candidate and that Donald Trump would be the Republican candidate for president of the U.S. and, I predicted that Donald Trump would win the 2016 election.

Except for the China SDR inclusion, I predicted all of these events many months in advance and received a heavy amount of criticism each time from people in the mainstream and even from people in the liberty movement. Hilariously, as soon as these predictions proved true, some of the same people that were fervently opposed came quickly out of the woodwork to claim they “saw it coming all along”. I suppose this is human nature, but it is a problem because it keeps people from learning how to better gauge globalist behavior and come to correct conclusions.

My goal in this article is to make EVERY liberty activist adept at predicting globalist driven events. So, here is a good place to start:

Learn To Play Chess

The elites are obsessed with chess and chess symbolism. Many of their strategies develop much like a game of chess develops. If you don't know how to play chess, I suggest you learn. You don't have to master the game, but you do need to understand the basic concepts of winning the game.

For example, if you know the target that your opponent is really pursuing, you can easily obstruct his efforts because all his movements will become predictable. If his goal is to take your Queen, and you know this, then he should never be able to take your queen. This is why the elites go to great lengths to distract their opponents (meaning us) from their true target. They want you to think they are going straight for your King, or your Knight; they want you focused elsewhere. They will use feints often.

Another core strategy of chess is the “forced sacrifice”. That is to say, the best chess players are very good at positioning one of their pieces so that it threatens two or more of your pieces. This forces you to sacrifice one piece for the sake of the others. If they do this often enough, before you know it you have sacrificed your way into defeat. The globalists ALWAYS have a primary target and a secondary target. There is always more than one move developing at any given time.

Knowing chess is key to knowing how the globalists think.

Get In Touch With Your Darker Side

Going by their behavior and their rhetoric when they are unguarded, most globalists display highly narcissistic character traits as well as sociopathy and psychopathy. It is not enough to research these traits in a clinical fashion, you have to tap into the darker side of your own psyche, and think as they think. This means being willing to entertain evil and malicious concepts. You must be willing to ask yourself - “If I were them, how would I go about getting what I want?”

Understanding devious and aberrant psychopathic intent goes a long way in making the globalists predictable. Remember, many psychopaths are actually highly intelligent and intuitive. They don't have a moral compass and have lost the voice of conscience, but in order to adapt they have learned how to fake it. They are chameleons.

ALL people are inherently capable of evil actions, just as they are inherently capable of great good. You don't have to become like the elites, but you do have to go to some ugly places in your own mind. An elitist is basically a person who went to those places and discovered that he liked it there.

Read Globalist Publications

As noted above, the globalists have their own media outlets in which they publish their “views”, such as Foreign Policy Magazine, The Economist, Bloomberg, Reuters, etc. Sometimes these views are honest and sometimes they are calculated propaganda. Again, if you know exactly what the elitist targets are, then you can better discern if what they are saying is legitimate or a feint to distract you.

I predicted the success of the Brexit and the Trump win based on the knowledge that:

1) The globalists need a large scale crisis in order to drastically change public perceptions on society and governance. That is to say, they need to create a crisis so terrifying that people will be willing to accept a fully centralized global economic system and global governance as a solution.

2) The globalists have already set in motion an economic crisis that cannot be reversed. It is a crisis that they must avoid blame for at all costs once it accelerates.

3) Conservative and sovereignty principles are the primary threat to the dominance of globalism. As long as ideas of individualism, national sovereignty and decentralization exist, globalism can never truly prevail. Therefore, obstructing movements based on these principles is not enough. The globalists must also destroy any positive perceptions of our principles for generations to come.

4) As stated in the section on chess, the globalists like to use the strategy of forced sacrifice, in which they threaten two targets simultaneously, or kill two birds with one stone. I realized at the beginning of 2016 that all the rhetoric by globalists in their own publications on the “rise of populism” was staging the groundwork for the success of the Brexit and the success of Trump. What better strategy for the establishment than to allow conservative movements to take the helm of the political and economic ship just as that ship is about to sink? In this way, the globalists can have the crisis they need, while at the same time scapegoating conservatives and avoiding blame, and, destroying the image of conservative ideals, perhaps forever.

Have No Sacred Cows

This is a hard one for many people. We all have certain biases and these biases can blind us to reality. The overreaching bias within the liberty movement is a desire for heroic leadership. We have grown up on stories of heroes from George Washington to Thomas Jefferson – grand statesmen and military giants that crushed tyranny. The problem is, while men like Washington and Jefferson were indeed instrumental, they were nothing without the hundreds of thousands of unsung patriots working tirelessly for freedom on their own.

The founding fathers were not considered the founding fathers until long after the American Revolution was over. At the time, they were not thought of necessarily as heroes or even great leaders. They were just men, like many other men, gambling life and liberty on a cause that was uncertain at best.

Activists need to STOP looking around for mighty leaders and start taking leadership themselves in their own way. If we do end up with another Washington or Jefferson or Paine or Madison, etc., we will not know who they are until the fight is over and the history books are written.

The globalists take full advantage of the movement's weakness in seeking out and artificially elevating heroes. Also, when people have this bias, they end up with blinders when examining such heroes with any skepticism. Obviously I am referring to Donald Trump, here.

Sacred cows prevent accurate predictions of major events because a person will refuse to consider them as a potential negative factor.

Moving Beyond Predictions

It is one thing to be able to predict the outcome of social and political events; it is another matter to do something about them. In my next article I will outline solutions liberty activists can pursue on their own and in groups to counter globalist activity. Predicting their tactics is essential, but acting to disrupt those tactics should be the ultimate goal.

The globalists believe that even if some of us do manage to decipher their activities and methods, we will have no means to do anything about them. They see themselves as the “history makers”, as the men who act. They see us as the “history watchers”, or the meaningless masses wafting about with geopolitical tides, helpless and incapable of determining our own destinies. I believe we will become history makers in due course. One weakness of the globalists that will sabotage them is their own hubris. They see people as pawns – but what happens when a piece walks off the chess board completely and acts in an unpredictable way? It is this potential alone that will destroy the globalists in the end.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
J S Bach's picture

It's impossible for people with an ounce of morality to predict the behavior of those who have none at all.  They are an alien species and must be fought as though our very existence depended on it... and it does.

TBT or not TBT's picture

Probably a lot of them took inspiration from Asimov's Foundation trilogy.  Osama Bin Laden was a globalist too.  

TBT or not TBT's picture

For them, History needs guidance, progress toward an ideal.  

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

One can not mention 'neocons' without mentioning Zionist Jews, irrespective of the fact 'neocon' has been conflated with 'militarist' or 'interventionist.'

It was and is essentially PROXY ZIONISM: getting the US to fight Israel's (and Global Jewry's generally - see disprop. # Jews bashing Russia) wars.

This isn't a matter of opinion but of historical fact:

To know why Vichy DC does much or most of what it does, such as arming and aiding Al Qaeda and ISIS and ignoring Israeli spying etc - read what Zionist Jews themselves have written over the years, particularly re Syraq:

ps Krugman referenced Asimov's Foundation series as the basis of his Hyper-Statism and pseudoscientism ( economics, not a hard science, being treated as one to plan every aspect of economic activity, planning etc.)

Jim in MN's picture

Clintonistas openly envied the Chinese Communist leaders and sought to emulate them.

DownWithYogaPants's picture

I have trouble with articles like this saying well gee I predicted this that and the other thing.  Additional I've done double and triple reverse psychology on the masters of the universe and now I can think 3 chess moves ahead of them.

I have to be skeptical.  He could be right.  But he could also be some dude selling gold or a newsletter or fame seeking.

Pepe Escobar's article about how Trump's term will play out comes to mind. It that case it had TPTB bring industry back to the USA and Trump being their puppet.  Then there is this article that has Trump being the fall guy.  

All of it grates on my extremely curious nature.

runningman18's picture

I'm not sure it matters what his intentions are, selling gold or not.  His predictions were right.  Who cares about the rest.

wildbad's picture

hey DWYP - yeah. its tough to get past our own ideas about how things might play out. that pepe article is weighing heavily on me too.

i simply do not want to believe that all of this fabulous stuff coming from trump is a mask, or a red herring for some greater globalist goal. i want it to be pure vanilla liberty.

i long for a spade to be a spade and for all of this intrigue to become a relic of an unenlightened past.

i know this is all wishful thinking and is exactly the trap that this author is warning of but i fall back to the huge field of enemies Trump has arrayed against him for exactly the reasons I am willing to fight for.

I think the author is reading too much into everything.

DownWithYogaPants's picture

I'm not the emotional type when it comes to trying to calculate a bet.

In regards this guys theory on Trump the Fall Guy: I think it is a bit overly complicated.

On Pepe's theory: Trump the Puppet: It does explain a win that many say was impossible. ( In spite of the fact I said the day I saw Trump announce June 15, 2015 he would win so I have the propagated problem of feeling those folk were a bit clueless ) 

I would feel so much better about all this if I were on the board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and could print my own money.

eforce's picture

The Protocols said that the left (blind mob) would be used to sweep away their enemies...

"6. The people, under our guidance, have annihilated the aristocracy, who were their oneand only defense and foster-mother for the sake of their own advantage which is inseparably bound up with the well-being of the people. Nowadays, with the destruction of the aristocracy, the people have fallen into the grips of merciless money-grinding scoundrels who have laid a pitiless and cruel yoke upon the necks of the workers.

7. We appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker from this oppression whenwe propose to him to enter the ranks of our fighting forces - Socialists, Anarchists,Communists - to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherlyrule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our SOCIAL MASONRY. The aristocracy,which enjoyed by law the labor of the workers, was interested in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy, and strong. We are interested in just the opposite - in the diminution, the KILLING OUT OF THE GOYIM. Our power is in the chronic shortnessof food and physical weakness of the worker because by all that this implies he is madethe slave of our will, and he will not find in his own authorities either strength or energyto set against our will. Hunger creates the right of capital to rule the worker more surelythan it was given to the aristocracy by the legal authority of kings.

8. By want and the envy and hatred which it engenders we shall move the mobs and with their hands we shall wipe out all those who hinder us on our way."

NidStyles's picture

Everyone is always selling themselves. When you speak publicly or push an opinion out there in a manner such as this, it's marketing. Propaganda works the same exact way as marketing.

new game's picture

yoga, my perspective is always short term. if i'm heading in the right direction wtf does it matter two years out. plus, shit happens and changes everything. everybody has a plan until they get punched...

turnoffthewater's picture

Add Kissinger (China visit '70's) and most of the globalist and some monarchy to the list

bamawatson's picture

damn man you been tending to your business in fine fashion

boattrash's picture

Biker Dave was tending to business as well...I present to you, "Biker Dave" in DC

Fatboy777's picture

You're evidence a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. Maybe if you spent your time doing something industrious you wouldn't be the envious POS you are blaming others for your trailer trash existence. Oohhhhhh the Zionist....maybe had you just studied at school instead of now obsessing about the man behind the curtain you wouldn't be so filled with hate. I bet you're a coward too

wildbad's picture

and lets hope he gets a new striped suit soon.

wildbad's picture

and lets hope he gets a new striped suit soon.

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

Awwww... Heavy flow day, Rachel?

I noticed you failed to either reference any particular thing I wrote, nor any of the content in the links - the Catbird link is a detailed history of the origins of the neocon movement with Irving Kristol and other Israel Firster formerly communist Zionist Jews that is quite scholarly in tone and approach, and the historycommons links is solely regarding what Israel Firster Zionist Jews have themselves said or written, largely about Iraq and Syria's desired destruction.

But you don't want to address these, you simply throw a tantrum because - gasp - it makes warmongering Israel Firster chickenhawk Jews who want the US to fight Likud Israel's wars of aggression - look like warmongering Israel Firster chickenhawk Zionist Jews who want, BY THEIR OWN WORDS, to visit death and destruction on Israel's neighbors so that Jews don't have to pay for or bleed for lebensraum.

You want to dispute a claim, or offer contrary evidence - that's great, happy to read it and try to consider it fairly.

But this hackneyed attempt to make criticism of Israel Firster warmongering Jews who advocate for endless war for Israel... a criticism of ALL jewish people is tedious, dishonest, and ineffective.

Why don't you **try** to muster an actual argument?

Is it because you're simply too stupid to do anything but cry 'antisemite' in essence whenever any subset of Jews is criticized - even via THEIR OWN WORDS?

Stop acting like a faggot, and if you think I'm wrong, or unfair, then give some evidence as to why. I'm not interested in being seen as dishonest, or unfair, or peddling bullshit - I think I'm posting about *facts* that generally go undiscussed, and which contribute to needless death and suffering and waste.

So - care to tender an argument? Are you seriously going to try to dispute that the neocon movement was/is not Jewish and Zionist in origin and motive? Because that's not a matter of opinion, but of historical fact - fact even Zionist Jewish writers, as the Catbird article indicates, admitted themselves.

Part of honest discussion is not rejecting an argument without considering the evidence supplied in support thereof.


Fatboy777's picture

Bro I can't read your shit no more so how can I reply intelligently. You're a broken record. You got Jew envy I think. What happened to you? Daddy got cucked by some horse hung Jew?

quadraspleen's picture

"Daddy got cucked by some horse hung Jew?"

Translation: I haven't got a single coherent response to your barrage of verifiable information backed up with a long posting history of links, and my IQ is clearly low by the calibre of my repetitive, weak (non-existent) responses, so I'm gonna mouth-breathe a bit and insult yo daddy

How'd I do? That was pretty spot-on I think.

Time for school, sonny?

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

I expected as much, but you have to be the biggest PUSSY on this site.

You didn't even *try*

- How does that feel?

turnoffthewater's picture

"Heavy flow day, Rachel?"

Rachel: 'I wish was a man.'

TuPhat's picture

Maybe it just isn't that important.  When someone is a bad actor and I know it, then his ancestry is of little importance.  I don't think Obama is a jew but he is on my list of bad guys.  I guess you think he is wonderful because of his birth.  Not me.

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

if a guy's a rapist who is jewish, youd be right- the background would not be relevant. The act did not flow from his ethnic loyalty, religion or culture

But when warmongers monger war for Israel out of ethnic or religious loyalty, putting another state and people above the interests of their host country... when they write papers for Israel's gov which they repackage and tweak for Americans (ODED YINON's Strategy for Israel in the 1980s >>>A Clean Break >>> Rebuilding America's Defenses by PNAC)

- it is a lie of ommission to not discuss their Jewishness and Zionism.

more broadly, if you read an article on the North of Ireland, would you rush to claim that the fact the author was Paddy O'Sullivan is unimportant and that assuming some bias is 'anti-Celtite'? what if he also had deep ties to SinnFein?

Jews enjoy an absurdly low threshold for censoring discussion - FACTS that dont reflect well are not simply facts but 'hate'.

It's absurd

Fatboy777's picture

You don't shit up do you with your Jew crap. Anyway let me tell you the motive of a globalist- go where input costs are cheapest. That's it idiots! There's no great conspiracy.

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

by 'Jew crap' you mean exposing Israel Firster Zionist Jew warmongers?

You're the one conflating them with the set of all Jewish people - not me.

But perhaps you simply are angry that any Jew is criticized at all?

Bill Kristol, Richard Perle, The Kagans and their ilk are traitorous evil cunts. they have far, far too much influence, and they are a major, and perhaps predominant cause of Vichy DC's orgy of violence in MENA.

Am I supposed to write 'not all Jews' every other sentence?

I'll do that when hypocrites like you get as upset when groups other then Jews are criticized. It's just that your selective outrage is hard to take seriously - or cater to.

But no - I do not mean 'all' or even most Jews.

Most/All A are B does not imply Most/All B are A. A smart fella like you ought to know that.

Fatboy777's picture

Dummy take another logic course and another religious studies class and a litany of liberal studies courses to boost but I suggest you get a job and a little pussy wouldn't hurt you. All Jews or some Jews, all red necks or some who gives a shit. Everyone is out to save their own skin and every individual will sacrifice their "tribe" to save their immediate family. The selfish Gene put that book on your list of revised history book list. Now I got shit to do. You sound like a snowflake to me complaining and ranting except they complain about safe spaces and you whine about non- existent conspiracies.

Snípéir_Ag_Obair's picture

Hey asshole:

Remember the 1st rule of Holes :

When yer in one - stop digging.


quadraspleen's picture

I bet you're a riot at parties. Are you still at school or do you work for MediaMatters?

Justsayin''s picture

It seems to me that all Muslims would naturally be globalists, in the sense that they believe their cult is intended for every human being on the planet -- or else.  Same for Communists, but of course with vast differences, but with the same lack of choice.

pippi68's picture

Isn't David Brock involved in the child sex trafficking? What if Huma's emails contained sufficient proof to send him to prison?

UmbilicalMosqueSweeper's picture

...or Talmudic joos who think that all non-joos (goyim) were only created to serve the Chosen Ones.

Jim in MN's picture

I loved that series when I first read about age 12.  I was a wee bit precocious.  I could recite the plot in like 20 minute chunks from tha back of my Mom's Malibu. 

It does dovetail nicely with sociopathic fantasies of total control.  Of course, there is always a mutant to throw off the real world...

To the real globalists there can be no greater threat than simple entrepreneurship, be it economic, or tactical on the battlefield.  It is the same 'shopkeepers' that fueled the European and American Revolutions.

We are the toothpaste.  Fuck their tubes.

Publicus_Reanimated's picture

Right there with you, read them all as a tweener.  I was entertained.  Weaker minds were inspired.

TradingTroll's picture

That is why prey must become predator

runningman18's picture

And yet, they are predictable.

GreatUncle's picture

Just kill them be done with it, failing that everything they care about.

The thing is if you don't they will just come back over and over again until they win.

This allowing them to play their game is what needs halting and you either remove the game or them.


American Gorbachev's picture

i disagree (and i'm not the downvote)

it is possible to regain morality (tho it takes a long time and is rather painful) after having been immoral in youth

those of us who have done so are able to "channel" their former selves and thus see a step or two (sometimes three) into the machinations of the PTB

one but has to "think like a rotten, selfish sob" and extrapolate from there (tis really not that hard)

plus the PTB often 'telegraph' their intentions (usually from the germination of a trial balloon in the press, it takes on average a decade to fully implement, tho times/changes seem to be moving faster than in decades past ... ala, the status of the u.s. dollar as reserve currency)

two future goals have been introduced into the political bloodstream in the past year/two, one of which seems to be moving ahead rather rapidly (the war on cash) and the other moving more "normally" (guaranteed income)

you're quite right that 'our existence depends on fighting'  (and always watching/thinking ahead)


Lumberjack's picture

Based on their latest move, they are trying to hide behind womens skirts.

Bunga Bunga's picture

Is that Soros in 50 years?

zebrasquid's picture

Hillary in 4 years when they run her again.

----_-'s picture
----_- (not verified) Jan 22, 2017 10:48 PM

"in fact, whenever such movements do arise the establishment is swift to obstruct them or co-opt them. I witnessed this first hand during the Ron Paul campaign in 2008 and 2012 – the mainstream deliberately refused to acknowledge Ron Paul's existence, because attacking him repeatedly would have been a zero sum strategy that would have given him greater public attention and free publicity"



there you go CNN and trump

and there goes the "muh anti establishment trumptards"

lester1's picture

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer didn't lie about the crowd size. My friend and I waited in line over 2 hours to get in the inauguration and missed the swearing in because TSA was rediculousy slow. Perhaps on purpose to make Trump's crowds look smaller ? A last FU from Obama maybe?

Our line had about 10,000 Trump supporters like us who didnt get in to.see the swearing in ceremony because of TSA. TSA only had 3 metal detectors!! There were several other general admission lines with thousands of people who didnt get in. It's a disgrace and the news isn't even talking about it !!

Here is a video I made showing the long lines to get in. Pass it along. People need to know the truth!!