On Boycotting Radical Islamic Nations

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Nonie Darwish via The Gatestone Institute,

  • The interviewer seemed shocked to hear that I do not have any Arab or Muslim friends who are protesting President Trump's ban, and that many immigrants of Islamic origin support the ban and are fed up and embarrassed by what jihadists are doing.
  • The lesson America needs to know is that the West is not doing Muslims a favor by constantly treating them as children who should be shielded from reality. They hunger for the truth: that their educational system and mosque preaching are full of incitement, are abhorrent, hate-filled and the foundation upon which violent jihad is built.
  • Muslims need to know that the world does indeed have a justifiable and legitimate concern about Islam and actions done in the name of Islam by Muslims.
  • Muslims need to look at themselves in the mirror and see the world from the point of view of their victims. Instead, the West is sacrificing its culture, values, laws, pride and even self-respect.
  • It might compassion that leads the West to take in millions of Muslim refugees but it is reckless compassion. Do Westerners question the motivation of Islamic theocracies as to why ultra-rich Arab nations are sending us their refugees but taking in none?
  • Some "tough love" is urgently needed if Muslims are to be motivated to change and reform.

Early this morning an Arabic radio station in the Middle East called asking my opinion about President Trump's ban on refugees and citizens of seven Muslim nations. The radio host, who sounded angry over the ban, was a Christian Arab. She was surprised to hear that I supported the ban and think that it should have taken place the day after 9/11.

She then asked me if I knew any Arab American activist who was against the ban because she wanted to interview someone against the ban. She seemed shocked to hear that I do not have any Arab or Muslim friends who are protesting the ban, and that many immigrants of Islamic and Middle East origin support the ban and are fed up and embarrassed by what jihadists are doing.

She said that all she sees on CNN and other channels are riots that portray almost all Americans supporting Muslims and against Trump. I am upset over the success of the leftist propaganda all over the Middle East. It brings back memories of the life of the hate indoctrination and misinformation I lived under for most of my life.

What would Muslim countries do to the West, I asked, if 19 American terrorists flew airplanes into Arab capitals and their government and military headquarters? What did she think Arabs would do if every week or so American terrorists would conduct synchronized killing sprees all over the Muslim world, gunning Muslims down, blowing them up with homemade pressure cookers, ramming into crowds with trucks? There was silence.

She then started calming down and said that of course she is against terrorism, "but". I asked: "Do you see what jihad did to your Christian community in the Middle East?" She was silent for a minute, then it occurred to me that she might be afraid to continue the conversation because her bosses were probably Muslims.

I was sure she was going to hang up on me, but to my surprise she asked me to please hold. Then she was back, live from the studio, and started interviewing me and asked the same questions on air. I poured my heart out in Arabic to the Arab listeners.

The lesson here is that Arabs are hungry to hear the truth; this Arab station, instead of rejecting these ideas, ended up putting them on air. The lesson America needs to learn is that the West is not doing Muslims (especially the reformists) a favor by constantly treating them as children who should be shielded from reality.

Muslims need to know that the world does indeed have a justifiable and legitimate concern about Islam and actions done in the name of Islam by Muslims. Muslims need to look at themselves in the mirror and see the world from the point of view of their victims. Instead, the West is sacrificing its culture, values, laws, pride and even self-respect. Muslim culture needs a wake-up call telling them that, sooner or later, non-Muslim nations will close their doors to any kind of Muslim immigration if the jihad culture continues. That will also be a strong message to Muslims already in the West who still believe in jihad.


President Donald Trump signs an executive order restricting immigration, January 27, 2017. (Image source: Reuters video screenshot)

The Muslim people are hungry for the truth: that their educational system and mosque preaching are full of incitement, abhorrent, hate-filled and the foundation upon which violent jihad is built. The Islamic commandment to do jihad sacrifices Muslim men, women and children to kill and get killed.

As long as the West continues its appeasement of Islamic jihad, Islam will never reform and the West will lose. So far, the West has continued to extend a lifeline to the religion of Islam; a religion for which the number one enemy is the truth, and which struggles to suppress the truth.

It might be compassion that leads the West to take in millions of Muslim refugees, but it is reckless compassion. Why isn't Saudi Arabia taking refugees temporarily until things settle down in Syria and Iraq? Do Westerners question the motivation of Islamic theocracies, as to why ultra-rich Arab nations are sending us their refugees but taking in none?

Who is really benefiting from the policy of appeasement, the acceptance of Sharia-stricken theocracies and their jihadist, hate-filled education? Some "tough love" is urgently needed if Muslims are to be motivated to change and reform.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Rebel yell's picture

That would be anti-Semitic. Eurasians are semites. Divest from the terrorist nation of Israel!

OverTheHedge's picture

"The interviewer seemed shocked to hear that I do not have any Arab or Muslim friends"

The interviewer telephoned "The Gatestone Institute", and was surprised????!!!!

This article, like all Gatestone Institute articles, is complete tosh, but entertaining none the less, in a rabidly racist, nonsensical way.

philipat's picture

Thank God Bolton was ejected together with all the other Zionist neocons.

NewHugh's picture

Fuki is MDB.  Still linking to his bullshit accredited times website..

Chris Dakota's picture

An American Muslim in San Francisco told me "You know many Muslims don't want the refugees in, they don't like to say it though."

Of course not, look at the behavior in Europe.

xythras's picture

MDB take your stinking SJW craplog out of here. We don't care about your leftist tourette ramblings.

WE'RE VIKINGS no pussy hats like you

Vikings Invade Scotland Town and burn Ships

http://dailywesterner.com/news/2017-02-01/vikings-invade-scotland-town-a...

new game's picture

3 percent change the world with 1 percent backing.

trump is 1 percenter. we have work to do...

FreezeThese's picture

A story about someone with no Muslim or Arab friends supporting the Muslim Ban ... they could've gone to a GOP convention to reach the same conclusion ... color me shocked

NewHugh's picture

... I'm fairly certain thay Xythras and FreezeThese are MDB as well, feebly attempting some reverse psychology at times.  That explains the 3 down votes...

jeff montanye's picture

if not in person, in spirit.

the gatestone institute is obviously a sayanim enclave but useful as a sparring partner to keep up our speed and accuracy.

again, imagine the u.s. weak and the ussr and china taking texas in 1950 and turning it into, say, a chinese communist nation (nothing against the chinese communists, who aren't communists anymore, but you know, foreign).  and over time the chinese texans take new mexico, oklahoma, arkansas and louisiana.  and europe says it's ok and russia and china say so too.  russia even occasionally bombs alaska and california.

how do you feel? 

wangshui's picture

"no muslim or arab friends  PROTESTING  the ban"   learn how to read

bh2's picture

Will someone in either party please solicit this lady to run for Congress?

Fathead Slim's picture

I'd solicit her to run her car off a cliff, if 'she' is actually is a she. I think all the articles on that site are written by a group of paid hacks, all of them men.

TheEndIsNear's picture

At least your Spam is better than MDB's.

NewHugh's picture

I believe MDB and Xythras are one and the same...

shovelhead's picture

Incessant spamming for clics.

Buy an ad.

JRobby's picture

"She watches CNN"

(Laugh Track Deafening!!!!!)

JRobby's picture

Same for all races. Depends on the era.

The media and GOV have to cry and argue about something. 

fel.temp.reparatio's picture

are average americans embarrassed by red-neck antics? ...i'd say yes they are.

are average australians embarrassed by bogan buffoonery? ...sure, who wouldn't be.

...it's not too hard to grasp the concept. we *all* tend to look/walk the other way and die a little inside.

MANvsMACHINE's picture

That's a typo. It should say discredited.

Byte Me's picture

"Fuki is MDB.  Still linking to his bullshit accredited times website.."

More like Mini-MDB.

BennyBoy's picture

 

More accredited bullshit.

Motasaurus's picture

Until we ban donations from oil rich Arab states this is all moot. Islam itself is the problem. There is no such thing as "radical" or "moderate" Islam. They are merely two separate, yet completely theologically justified, methods for waging war. The "radical" is simply carrying out Jihad. Forcing submission of the Kafir (non muslims) through violence. the "moderates" are carrying out Hijrah. Infiltrating Kafir society through migration and using their wealth to take over cultural and social institutions. 
As a strategy Hijrah lasts until such time as the muslim community is populous enough to transition into Jihad. The entire point is to make an enemy society too weak to speak out against Islam and so they will accept the steady submission to Allah.

The only way to save the West is to treat Islam for what it is: a crime against humanity. If you wish to live in the West you must renounce the cube-enclosed space rock and its child raping prophet. We must ban all donations to and from Islamic nations, people and organisations. We must tear down all the mosques and send everyone who won't denounce the dehumanising submission back to Arabia where they belong.  

new game's picture

MIC and FED. until changed, same bullshit. two hearted beast. double dager or two stabs...

ZeroSense's picture

You know am sick and tired of hearing this rubbish and propaganda. You people are either very deceptive lyres or ignorant beyond belief (GOD tells us its the former). BTW how many Muslim countries have attacked western countries or the USA over the last few decades? How many western countries have attacked Muslim countries (raped, pillaged, killed, destroyed entire countries)? The Muslim countries list that have been attacked and destroyed by the west is pretty long.. The Muslim world needs to wake up before they are picked apart one by one by vultures (The USA & UK)

Motasaurus's picture

This muslim is:
a) Denying the word of Allah, and so is an apostate and hated by Allah.
b) Practising Taqiyya: the act of lying to infidels in order to infiltrate their societies as part of the Hijrah.

What are the mechanisms the strategy of Hijrah is operated as to achieve world Islamic rule? Two important means are Tamk?n and I‘d?d.

Tamk?n means to enable control in all relevant matters, to consolidate Islamic rule (Sûratal-A‘r?f, 7:10; Sûrat Yusûf, 12:56; Sûrat al-Kahf, 18:84; Sûrat al-H?jj, 22:41; Sûrat al-Qasas 28:6). I’d?d means preparation in military terms against the infidel enemies (Sûrat al-Anf?l, 8:60. From this verse comes the logo of the Muslim Brotherhood). In contemporary usage, it internally means consolidating the Muslim community by socialization and indoctrination processes; and externally, it grants the Muslims the legitimacy to infiltrate all D?r al-Kufr’s infrastructure and institutions in order to conquer them from within. The reference is to the example of Abraham who emigrated for the sake of Allah (Sûrat al-‘Anqabût, 29:26).

This example raises the ability to use power and to seize the host lands. That is why the establishment and empowerment of the Islamic Ummah through Hijrah to the infidels’ lands is a command of Allah for Islam’s victory.it is also accompanied by the command to perform “good” and to abstain from “evil” (Sûrat al-‘Imr?n, 3:110, 114, 132; Sûrat al-Taubah, 9:71, 112). However, doing “good” has never meant practicing the universal or moral of Western Golden Rule for the sake of mankind or recognizing and legitimizing the other, but only domestically, doing good within the Islamic community.

The pinnacle of that “good” in political terms is to promote Islam as the only religion and to work for the advancement of Islamic interests (Mas?lih al-Isl?m). Therefore, it is important for Western public opinion to understand that when Muslims declare in praise of peace, tranquility, and cooperation it is not for mutual peaceful relationships with the infidels, in a pluralistic world, according to Western conceptions, but only for the Islamic interests, advancement, and achievements. There is no recognition and no acceptance of the other’s legitimate existence. 

sarz's picture

Motashlomo has certainly done his homework. Why do I think this guy is sitting in Herzliya? I am reminded of the grand proclamation by the new Caliph. I noticed at the time that the perfectly translated English version of a work of intellectual rigor not to be found outside top Western universities was obviously the work of a coven of Jews close to the Jewish Arabist super-nuisance Bernard Lewis. 

A few years ago it occurred to me that Judaism is not entitled to constitutional protection because it is not a religion. It is satanism wearing the mantle of religion. Thinking is not really individual, and there seem to to have been some Jews thinking the same thing, on the other side. They soon came out with their defense -- say it about Muslims. 

When Trump came out with his idea of tracking Muslims and their mosques, a little voice told me he had something ulterior in mind. And sure enough, soon there were gaggles of Jews saying, it could be us. Indeed, it could. Aameen! 

Motasaurus's picture

I'm not Israeli, and I'm not an Ashkenazi Pharisee. 
My family is Norman through and through, with a small sprinkling of Anglo-Saxon.  

Ban KKiller's picture

Muslims must convert or die? Yeah, I think so. Islam is total nonsense used to control the ignorant.All religions are silly, of course but Islam is dangerous as it controls the stupid and poor. So yeah, bomb them to their heaven, now. When I see Muslims I ask "a nine year old, really? How many wives? Really?" They know their religion is shit but they are trapped.

Of course they are smelly too. My juvenile thought for the day.

SummerSausage's picture

The entire middle east was Christian for hundreds of years.  How many Christians remain in those areas? How many Christian churches remain? What happened to them? What countries still practice slavery and which religions justify slavery and/or death for "non-believers"?

Al Armed's picture

Judaism.

If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth; Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.

 

Deut 13:7

Kayman's picture

"ignorant beyond belief"?  Look in a mirror.

 Tell us the history of how Mohamed and his followers invaded other nations, slaughtered innocents, and spread the disease of Islam from the Pagan rock in Mecca.

I completely agree that Western countries should get out of the Middle East, But Islam is not a "turn the other cheek, love thy neighbor, do unto others as you would have them do unto you" religion/social structure.


herbivore's picture

All religions are rather silly, some more silly than others, perhaps. Somehow, and I don't understand why, Christian religions decided to end their jihadi ways several hundred years ago- deciding to make peace with science. Well, thank god for that. I don't know what it will take for Islam to come around but they're way behind. Problem is, you can't tell them they're way behind because they'll be insulted. That's the nature of belief systems- they're so fragile because they rest on a foundation of loose sand. But once a human being comes to identify with a belief system they're highly resistant to change. It's as if the belief system has a life of its own, like it's a parasite that infiltrates a host. 

Motasaurus's picture

Make peace with science? Christianity gave birth to science. 

That historical tidbit aside, the main (if not the sole) reason Christianity was able to put its medieval ways behind it is that Christianity not only allows, but actually encourages critical reflection. Islam does not. To criticise the Qu'ran or the Sutras is to criticise Allah. To criticise Allah is to be in a state of apostasy - and so deserving of death. 
They cannot reform, as Christianity reformed. They cannot be at peace with the West without attempting to make it Islamic, because the Qu'ran tells them they cannot. They cannot question the Qu'ran because it is the word of Allah, and to question Allah is to be apostate.

They can lie to non-muslims about what their motives are. But the reason every country that has ever had a critical mass of Islamic citizens has turned into an Islamic theocracy is because that is what the Qu'ran demands of all Muslims. 

herbivore's picture

Christianity gave birth to science? Tell that to Galileo and a long list of scientists who were deemed heretics by The Church. If Christianity gave birth to science, they sure had a funny way of showing it. No, sorry, Christianity is a belief system that fortunately recognized the error of its ways and did indeed reform itself. However, there are many examples of modern day Christians who would just as soon return to The Crusades and destroy the non-Christian infidels, John Bolton being a prime example.  Actually, one could make the same argument you make only substituting Islam for Christianity. Long ago there were Islam leaders who embraced science. In that sense, I wish Islam would return to its roots. I'm not sure what era that was but I'd like to see them return to it. And yes, let us instill in our children values of tolerance and compassion, but there is a limit to tolerance, and that limit is the teaching and practice of intolerance to the point of killing the "infidels".

Motasaurus's picture

You're sadly mistaken about Galileo. This excellently done blog series takes an historically accurate (and rather humorous) look at the case. 
http://tofspot.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/the-great-ptolemaic-smackdown-tab...

Also read this: https://www.quora.com/Why-did-science-make-little-real-progress-in-Europ...

Kayman's picture

And while it is true that the Catholic Church fought Galileo, Islam would have put him to death.  Meanwhile his book became a "best seller" in Christendom.

SummerSausage's picture

Your comment shows your ignorance about religion and history, specifically Jewish/Christian contribution to the evolution of a compassionate, tolerant and healthy society through science and philosophical questioning. 

There is a reason John Locke, Martin Luther, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, Albert Einstein, Jonas Salk were neither muslim nor marxist.

Humans will always have religion.  Liberals religion is government and the worship of flawed elites.

Better we encourage people to aspire to nobler behaviors than indoctrinate them to be hypocritcal liars enriching a class of elites who exercise complete control.

Banjopicker's picture

While eviscerating all religions with "all religions", you conveniently leave out that athiesm suffers from the same faults of obelief systems you describe.  The religious have faith in the unpprovable, athiests have faith in all that is only provable...  Truth is neither groups, religious vs athiests, know for sure and it boils down to faith.  

 

Man was also scientifically certain the world was flat once..

herbivore's picture

I don't think of myself as an atheist. I don't identify with any organized or disorganized belief system. I don't care what anyone believes as long as they don't seek to convert others under penalty of death and as long as they don't use our collective funds, i.e. government, to convert others. That said, the jihadi branch of Islam is totally unacceptable and someone needs to read the riot act to The House of Saud.

Motasaurus's picture

Your final statement is an impossibility. Man has known the earth was spherical since at least 2500BC. The scientific method (and so science) didn't exist until the mid 1200s A.D.

Kayman's picture

"Man was also scientifically certain the world was flat once.."

There was no science behind the "earth is flat" conjecture.

Kayman's picture

Early Christianity was destoyed by the Romans who centralized it into the Roman Catholic Church. Only with the advent of the Protestants did Christianity begin to embrace science.

Motasaurus's picture

This is also not historically accurate. Francis Bacon codified the scientific method. In the mid 1200s. The protestant movements didn't begin until the first quarter of the 1500s.

Vageling's picture

# Flagged as Fake News.

 

wildbad's picture

All Muslims are not alike, I agree. That does not absolve the "non-radical", "non-wahabi", "non-salafist", factions from loudly denouncing and taking more than partial responsibility for the misuse (if you believe that meme) of their "Religion of Peace".

In fact, the onus is on them to fix this political, violent domination machine which disguises power and political ends under a religious guise.

Muslims need to do their own policing and until they do so will be thrown under the same bus as their extremist fellow travelers.

Islam means "SUBMIT!" No thanks.

BennyBoy's picture

 

 "a religion for which the number one enemy is the truth, and which struggles to suppress the truth."

The US has a government for which the number one enemy is the truth, and which struggles to suppress the truth.