Beware Of Trojan Horses In Women's Movements

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Khadija Khan via The Gatestione Institute,

  • It must be so convenient, while marching in the safe confines of Washington DC, to advocate that other women -- far away -- be genitally mutilated, married off in childhood, and beaten and violated in their own homes. These women in hijabs marching on Washington do not have to live in this "Utopia." They are comfortably living in the "infidel West," protected from such barbarity.
  • The Western culture that allows women to shout into microphones is not even necessarily the culture these women believe in; it is often just a tool they use to promote totalitarian ideas such as anti-Semitism, religious intolerance and imposition of theocratic beliefs.
  • Does Linda Sarsour really think that people have gone so mad that they will give up the civil liberties that their ancestors earned through the centuries, merely for interest-free loans?
  • The hypocrisy is that Sarsour's bold lifestyle in the US portrays that deep down she herself loathes the suppressing conditions that she promotes for the poor women of the Muslim world, who actually have to live with them. Coming from a conservative Muslim society, I know the culture she yearns for would never allow her to launch such activism without permission from her "guardian" men.
  • The dissenting voices of the oppressed are fighting on two fronts. They are being crushed by their own totalitarian regimes and at the same time by Western apologists for these tyrants.

Why do women who believe in equal rights for women, pick as their spokesperson someone who one minute boasts of her supposed dissent as "patriotism," while the next minute advocating chopping off other womens' genitals? It is like choosing a hangman to campaign against the death penalty, or the head of ISIS to campaign for same sex marriages.

The principles of "dissent," of which they claim to be so proud, and to have borrowed from religious sources, are actually the modern world's liberal values and human rights -- just those rights values they seem to be trying to destroy.

From the other side of their mouths, however, they are trying to impose Islamic sharia law on the West. Unfortunately, sharia is openly antagonistic to Western values and human rights.

How can cults that believe in dominating others call themselves progressive, when their entire message runs counter to the spirit of tolerance and social coexistence?

The champions of sharia have always said they wish to establish a "righteous" form of government, made by divine law, and presumably to that end, they implant their set of rules -- such as allowing no debate or criticism on their beliefs, or such as segregating sexes -- to destroy modern democracies.

It must be so convenient, while marching on Washington DC, to advocate that other women -- far away -- be genitally mutilated, married off in childhood, and domestically beaten and violated -- and all the while, in the safe confines of Washington, to stay silent on issues of truly massive abuse: floggings; acid burnings; chopping off limbs or heads, or burning, drowning or burying people alive.

These women in hijabs marching on Washington DC do not have to live in this "Utopia." They are comfortably living in the "infidel West', protected from such barbarity.

The values they are enjoying here are the values of the enlightened world and have nothing to do with the culture they are trying to impose on others.

The culture that is allowing women such as Linda Sarsour to shout into microphones is not even necessarily the culture these women believe in; it is often just the culture they are using to promote totalitarian ideas such as anti-Semitism, religious intolerance and the imposition of theocratic beliefs through infiltration or force.

The culture to which Sarsour says she aspires, allows mutilating women but does not allow women to speak in a loud tone, let alone speaking through microphones. Hence, she owes her current privileges to her American identity.


Muslim activist Linda Sarsour one minute boasts of her supposed dissent as "patriotism," while the next minute advocates chopping off other womens' genitals. (Image source: Seriously.TV video screenshot)

Sarsour stated in a tweet on May 13, 2015: "You'll know when you're living under Sharia Law if suddenly all your loans & credit cards become interest free. Sound nice, doesn't it?"

Then she wrote on an April 29, 2014 tweet: "@RobertWildiris I don't drink alcohol, don't eat pork, I follow Islamic way of living. That's all Sharia law is."

It would be nice if the only requirements of sharia were avoiding alcohol or pork were; there happens, however, to be an ocean of dos and don'ts that fall into the category of "I follow Islamic way of living."

The ocean Sarsour never bothered to mention, but that the world witnesses every day, exists from the Saudi palaces to the caves of Afghanistan and Raqqa.

The culture that Sarsour desires to impose on the world -- along with promises to waive interest on loans -- does not allow women to interact with unrelated men, drive cars, ride bicycles, attend sports events, leave the house without permission, or wear makeup and clothes that reveal their body parts, let alone address a crowd.

Women would also need four male witnesses to prove a rape, or risk being stoned to death for "adultery."

Does Sarsour really think that people have gone so mad that they will give up all of their civil liberties and freedom that their ancestors earned through the centuries, merely for interest free loans?

The hypocrisy is that her bold lifestyle in the US portrays that deep down, she herself loathes the suppressing conditions that she likes promoting for the poor women of the Muslim world who actually have to live with them.

How would these women in hijabs like to spend a few weeks under the totalitarian regimes about which they love to brag?

Three British girls who followed the call of ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi slipped into Syria to join the jihad, only to be desperate over the mistake they had made; one is believed dead.

Kadiza Sultana, Shamima Begum and Amira Abase, intoxicated by ISIS propaganda, entered Syria to join the holy mission and be ISIS brides.

Sultana reportedly was killed in a Russian airstrike while too scared to try an escape from ISIS, fearing extreme torture and public execution if caught.

The whereabouts of the other two are still unknown, apart from rare contact reported between them and their families.

Sophie Kasiki, a French girl who also managed to break away from the ISIS stronghold in Raqqa with her four-year-old son, said she risked death if caught to try to save her son. She defined the ordeal of being with ISIS as "a journey into a hell from which there seemed no return."

Samra Kesinovic, a 17 year old Austrian girl, was reportedly beaten to death by ISIS fighters when she was caught trying to flee, after being "gifted" by her partner to another ISIS fighter as a sex slave.

The irony is that Linda Sarsour and her followers say they love Hamas and caliphates like the one established by Abu Bakar al-Baghdadi, or Saudi and Iranian regimes -- but of course they do not live in them.

Sarsour has doubtless been put forward by men to promote their soft image as they themselves cannot boast about the rights they are giving to their women.

Coming from a conservative Muslim society, I know the culture she yearns for would never allow her to launch such activism without permission from her "guardian" men.

How come she forgot to mention that in Saudi Arabia and many other Muslim states, her kind of activism would cost a woman her family, her honour and probably her life.

A court in the state of Washington suspended the ban on travelers from seven mainly Muslim countries imposed by the President Trump last week.

Would any judge or influential person dare refute the order of, say, the Saudi King, a sharia council of Iran, a member of a royal family from a Middle Eastern country, a military dictator or the Hamas leaders Sarsour apparently so admires?

You cannot even imagine in your worst nightmares dissenting in those sharia-compliant territories, but yes, dissent is allowed in the US and the West, where people are freely allowed to speak their thoughts.

These are not the values of the alien land she professes to admire; these were fought for and earned by the people of the West with their blood.

The progressives' one-sided love affair with extremists will never serve the purpose of promoting equality.

In fact, it could be counterproductive. In Egypt, the conservative men used women as protestors to overthrow Husni Mubarak's regime, but once the Muslim Brotherhood, which spearheaded the Morsi regime, took control, the whole world watched in shock as they imposed sharia on everyone -- most of all on those women. The Morsi regime later punished women who protested the Iranian-style sharia that it was imposing.

The same imams who were the moving spirits behind Egypt's revolution were then delivering fatwas [religious opinions] to rape the same women who had been marching in the streets for their rights. According to al Arabiyya:

"An Egyptian Salafi preacher, said raping and sexually harassing women protesters in Cairo's Tahrir Square is justified, calling them "crusaders" who "have no shame, no fear and not even feminism.... Abu Islam added that these women activists are going to Tahrir Square not to protest but to be sexually abused because they had wanted to be raped...And by the way, 90 percent of them are crusaders and the remaining 10 percent are widows who have no one to control them.. "

Around 80 women were molested in one night alone, when the Morsi government was ousted and people came out to celebrate his departure.

Those are the views Sarsour is trying to sell.

The same men these liberals and progressives are trying to empower, once enthroned, would declare them apostates and inflict the worst imaginable punishments on them for the "crimes" they are committing by promoting the set of values they think bring harmony in the world.

The dissenting voices of the oppressed are fighting on two fronts. They are being crushed by their own totalitarian regimes and at the same time by apologists for these tyrants whom the marchers are empowering -- probably without even realizing what massive harm they are doing.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
NoDebt's picture

"How can cults that believe in dominating others call themselves progressive, when their entire message runs counter to the spirit of tolerance and social coexistence?"

That would be the definition of progressivism.  That's how that lie works.  But once you've seen it for what it is you can't un-see it.

 

"How can cults that believe in dominating others call themselves progressive, when their entire message runs counter to the spirit of tolerance and social coexistence?"

They're not trying to promote equality.  They're playing the people who may genuinely believe in those things.  Why?  Because it's fucking easy when you've been indocrinated to be a useful idiot.

 

Chris Dakota's picture

Democrats have lost 1200 seats in national and state elections since 2010.

they are dead!

Don't even read anything about this nonsense, it isn't good for you.

It has become tabloid shit.

peddling-fiction's picture

Chris, are you going to stay in SF and California?

Chris Dakota's picture

Yes because I own a business here and I am too old to start up someplace else.

I live outside the city where it is much, much better.

My house almost paid for 3 more yrs to go, I bought bottom of the market so taxes are low.

I am better off here and the weather is good you have a 9 month growing season, good for garden.

But I HATE the city now, almost everyone is insane there.

And I love California, the land the vibe, the light. Ive been here since the 50s.

Billy the Poet's picture

For some reason it's perfectly acceptable to slice away portions of the genitalia of day old baby boys without anesthesia.  Women shouldn't want that kind of equality?

HRH Feant's picture

I agree. It isn't okay. Unless there is a medical emergency no body modifications should be done until the person (boy or girl) is 18 years old and consents to that modification. Period.

Billy the Poet's picture

We agree but no one else seems to give a damn. There have even been sitcom episodes about silly men who tried to protect babies from mutilation.

greenskeeper carl's picture

I protected mine from it. If he gets older and decides he hates having foreskin Ill pay for the procedure. Somehow, I doubt that will happen. It is terrible what we do to baby boys, chopping part of their penis off at one day old without any numbing meds or anything. My wife's sister couldn't even sit in the room with their son, she had to leave, said it was horible....yet went through with it anyway. They also want to give them a fucking Hepatitus vaccine the instant they are born. Didn't get that either. I told the doctor I felt confident he wouldn't be having sex, getting a tattoo, or using drugs anytime soon ,and thought he'd be safe from hep for a while.

 

It is daunting though, especially for first time parents, which we were with my son. When you turn down the weenie-chopping and the shots, they ask you over and over. And keep making you reaffirm, and remind you about blah blah blah. They definitely apply the pressure.

Overfed's picture

Personally, I'm glad that I don't have a nasty, disgusting foreskin. Probably the only thing the Jews did right.

HRH Feant's picture

God bless you! That is my perspective! If they are 18 years old and want to have it be gone, by all means, I would be willing to pay for it! Absolutely.

At 18 years old they can decide.

I have the same point of view with regard to the girls getting breast implants that are younger than 18 years old -- NO WAY.

Same thing for parents that think they have a transexual child and want to give them hormones -- NO WAY.

I would go so far as to say wait until the kid is 21, but 18 is the age where kids are of legal age to vote. By the way, if you are old enough to vote and old enough to join the miltary you should also be old enough to drink. The alcohol laws making kids wait until they are 21 years old to drink are stupid.

thisandthat's picture

First of all, what jews do is to cut out the foreskin; sure it reduces sensibility, but it doesn't prevent pleasure or orgasm. What these people do (which I doubt is even legal by sharia law itself...) is not to just cut out the skin (labia), but outright cutting out the clitoris (also without anesthesia), sometimes even going further by cutting and sewing the labia together, leaving only a tiny hole that allows peeing and nothing more (there's written first hand accounts on that) - that's the equivalent of having your penis chopped off before even knowing what's sexual anything, let alone pleasure.

Obviously ritualistic scarifications are common in tribal cultures throughout the world and times (generally at puberty rituals of passage, though), but these here are exclusively for controlling -owning- women, not group identity.

But the shamelesness of this zionist Fraudstone "Institute" is really something else. Obviously, someone at ZH must love or owe them a lot, otherwise how could you explain that the very group of people at the origin of (and most hyperactive and vocal about) this relenteless campaign for 3rd world migration/integration/multiculturalism/diversity/etc. in the west, is now the one trying to claim themselves as the paladins of western christian civilization! Seriously? You bet - but just look up videos on "treatment of Christians in Israel", or the countless public boasting on the actual purpose of this campaign (ie: count Kalergi, Barbara Lerner Spectre, Abraham Foxman, Susan Sontag, Noel Ignatiev, Arthur Sulzberger, and countless more, I'm sure) and their real face will be revealed. Ironically, muslims, by definition and in their way, are christians as well (and probably much closer to the original faith than the roman church), since they hold Jesus as a true profet (like Moses, btw.)...

slasherNJ's picture

I do not believe a word of what Linda Sansour says. But for that matter, I don't believe a word of what the author of this article, Khadija Khan says. Reason: Any Muslim who is so much against Sharia Law as the author proclaims must leave Islam and only then can I believe her. Otherwise, it is Taqqiya. The practice that Islam allows to lie to Infidels in order to fool them.

Why is Khadija Khan who is supposedly dead set against Mohammad's Sharia Law still in Islam? What's so great about Islam that is not found in either Christianity or Buddhism or Hinduism that she is clinging to?

Islam and Judaism are two images of the same coin: Perversion of the understanding of who/what God is. God is not a bearded man in the sky.

Islam was born from a limited limited understanding of what God is which Mohammad then imposed on others via violence. When you need to impose your ideas through violence, you have lost the meaning of what God and Humanity means.

So if Khadija Khan wants to keep writing against Sharia Law (which is inextrcably a part and parcel of Mohammadism), she needs to come out of Islam. Well, well she is in the West, so no one will condemn her or cut her head off. So what's the excuse?

All of those folks who want to know more about the real origins of Islam, please read the seven parts of this very interesting blog post below.

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2015/04/lawrence-of-arabia-truth-exhum...

Slasher

 

 

 

thisandthat's picture

Well, the fact is all you said applies as much, if not more, to christianity, particularly roman, anglican and protestant. After all, it as well stems from judaism, to the point muslims call the three of them "the people of the book" and would better be called Abrahamic religion.

Btw, the only person I've seen (rightfully) saying GOD should've been refered to by IT, not HE (or SHE...), for refering to an incognita, was a muslim sheik on youtube...

fleur de lis's picture

Q. : When will Gatestone Institute write an article about Barbara Lerner Spectre?

A.:  Never

Wasn't she knowingly pushing multiculturalism to destroy thousands of years of European culture?

How much does anyone want to bet she is more familiar to Gatestone than they would ever admit?

Gatestone is part of the problem.

They pick and choose which anti Western, anti Christian destructors to cover but carefully avoid the instigators, misfits, and malcontents in the background who are funding it all.

Islamics could never make so many destructive inroads without help from misfits and malcontents in power.

Barbara Lerner Specter is a misfit and a malcontent, she is one of them so Gatestone will protect her.

Notice how she wormed her way like a termite into an institution dedicated to eroding Western culture.

Who paid her and who funded the organization?

How did she move from the US to Israel and then to Sweden and get set up with a nice cushy job pushing insidious policies?

They won't go near the Warburg banking family that picked up Coudenhove-Kalergi's idea that led to the EU.

They won't go near the filthy Rothschilds who have funded every bloodfest since the 1789 French Takedown.

They won't go near the Bonnier family that controls Swedish media and has reduced information to NWO propaganda.

They won't go near Soros/Schwarz or any of the other fake name instigators, only the intellectually stunted 14th century Islamics who are tools for destruction.

There is no way all those angry, impoverished, criminal, anti-social Islamics would be in Europe if they were not assigned to be there.

The Islamics were chosen because importing Latinos and Asians would backfire on the globalists because they would right away try to fit in and get on with a better life.

The globalists can count on the Islamics to be incurable morons so they were chosen for the job. 

 

 

 

 

ich1baN's picture

God is definitely a HE... "MAN" was made in the image of God. God wouldn't have transmuted his Maleness if he didn't want to make Man in His image. For crying out loud.... JESUS himself was a man.... what else do you need? Not that HIS gender matters, but then again it does or else He wouldn't have made man in His image and where did woman come from? Out of man. 

Women are equal to men in all facets, but the point is that God had reasons to show his UNIQUE identity and about a milion prophecies including how the church is the bride and God is the groom, would not make sense (of course some of you more intellectually replete will ascribe some sadistic sexual innuendos with my mentioning of this).

ich1baN's picture

Slasher, the value of your post is 10,000x more productive than those apologists above attempting to justify female genital mutiliation via circumcision. The 2 are no where even comparable. 

thisandthat's picture

Female genital mutilation is not circumcision, you fucking ignorant; it's excision - do you even know what the word means? Try imagining yourself having had your penis chopped off as a child and you might get an idea...

As for whether you believe "god" is a "man", a woman, an ox, a bird, or whatever else you see fit, I couldn't care less; your problem, not mine...

thisandthat's picture

That post (and thanks for that, btw; though some I already knew form other sources, quite impressive and revealing coverage) isn't really about islam or its roots, but in fact about jews, Rothschilds in particular, and their devious ways, reach, and degree of moral corruption, poisoning everything they touch like modern times reverse-Midas'.

MEFOBILLS's picture

Zionist Fraudstone institute revealed themselves in this statement:

 

"promote totalitarian ideas such as anti-Semitism"

 

Since when is anti-semitism a totalitarian idea?  Anti-Semitism is a learned behavior from being exposed to Semites.  Semites in turn is code for Jews.   Jews in turn engage in the Usury mechansim, and have for thousands of years.  Usury is sanctioned in their formative documents, especially Talmud.

Semite language speakers are also arabs.  

So, an anti-semite is somebody who is anti a language?  

Granted, a government can promote an anti-semite agenda, which is really an anti-jewish agenda.  Usually the government is trying to shake off its parasites - and in this case, which would be of benefit to its citizens.  A real country protects its vulnerable citizens from predators. 

Generally it was Monarchies in the past, who would catch onto the usury theft game, and then eject their rent-seeking population.  Hence, Jews were kicked out of countries over 100 times in history.

Almost certainly, there was calls of racism, or "totalitarianism" during those episodes.

peddling-fiction's picture

Chris, I have been many times to SF for conventions and also took the train from San Diego up to San Luis Obispo and then walked to the beach. It is beautiful country.

GraveDancer's picture

Islam IS the Trojan Horse! The new Nazism. Is Trump Churchill?

Book> The Road to World War III: Can the Dark forces of anti-Freedom trump Humanity?
Kindle> https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01MT31AXZ

AGuy's picture

Chris Dakota
Yes because I own a business here and I am too old to start up someplace else."

Well then you should get started very soon, because sooner or later your not going to have a business or at least one that is profitable in CA.

Sooner or later the man with the Bill is going to show up at CA's gov't doorstep and they are going to send every business into bankruptcy. CA probably as about $500B unfunded in gov't (state/local) pension liabilities. Even if they reduce pension outlays its still going to hurt.

As I see it you have a choice: Leave now and move your business. or be forced to close your doors and be unable to sell any property assets you may have. I can tell you in the Northeast its beginning as people are trying to leave, but unable to because there are no buyers for they're homes and commerical properties. The most popular signs here are "Home for sale" and "space available".

For the momemnt, is a tech bubble that is propping up the economy and RE prices in CA, but sooner or later the bubble is going to pop.

Eurotrash Sorehead's picture

Feminist bimbos trivialize the invasion of the West into something like..."the invaders have the right to their own clothing style"...what a bunch of belly botton pickers....the geopolitical abilities are non existant....

TBT or not TBT's picture

In the case of Sarsour, Taqqiya is literally a bitch.  

Wulfkind's picture

Here is all you need to know about Islam.

It is an Old Testament religion.  And a rip off of that.  It was founded by a sick in the mind pedophile warrior.  Its adherents are mostly the same.

Women in Islam are mostly insane.  ( Well....most women are insane...but Muslim women are a special kind of crazy ). 

In fact....Islam is not really a religion as much as a revolutionary political movement wrapped up in religiosity.  And not a bit of grace to be found in it.

Islam is a plague.  It should be treated as such.  Quarenteen when and where you can.  Exterminate if need be.

NoWayJose's picture

Break Sharia law and you lose a hand or head.

Break US law and the Ninth Circuit lays out a welcome mat, slaps the President's authority, and gives you free money, free healthcare, free housing, free education, free cell phones, etc

peddling-fiction's picture

¨Break US law and the Ninth Circuit¨

I see it as the 9th Circuit breaks U.S. Law and tries to play the part of the Executive.

Chief Wonder Bread's picture

It's hard to believe looking at this beautiful young woman that she could be an agent of a subversive power and that her public face of pleading for human rights is nothing but a sham to entrap the unwary.

But that is exactly what it and she is.

To gain a quick insight into the essential nature of the three Abrahamic religions, here's a link to an article contrasting Jewish vs Christian vs Islamic prayer rituals.

http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2015/03/comparing-prayers-jewish-christian...

To be concise, I won't comment on Judaism, which is a 'particularistic' (ie tribal) faith vs the other two religions which are universalistic in nature. Let's look then at Christianity vs Islam:

What does the Christian pray for? From the Lord's Prayer, we can see that they pray for "their daily bread" (the minimum material subsistence necessary to maintain life), and beyond that things like faith, mercy, forgiveness, the grace to forgive, the strength of character to follow God's ways.

What does the Muslim pray for? Again, faith above all. But then the Muslim prays for the destruction of the enemies of the faithful. That's it. Vengeance.

peddling-fiction's picture

This Earth of ours is led by the Principalities.

By the trickster.

Tejano's picture

She's wearing a hijab in the United States of America. What's wrong with her? ...Milo

 

DJ Happy Ending's picture

>beautiful young woman

you need to get out more.

Chief Wonder Bread's picture

After taking a second look, I instantly regretted saying that.

ebworthen's picture

Yes, why would the Left of the U.S. and Europe want to import citizens with a cultural heritage of oppression of Women, Homosexuals, and Christians and Jews?

Do they think they will "win them over" with smooth concrete, bright lights, and freebies?

It is a form of cultural self-immolation; are the Natural Family and Men such a threat?

New_Meat's picture

yes and yes and yes and yes

Chris Dakota's picture

Migrants are not a threat to Jewish elites, they are a threat to everyone else though.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UWpm0EdwOBQ/V6-5h-Y16FI/AAAAAAAAJT8/iOsAe0awi...

Billy the Poet's picture

The Christians waited for you to step up but when you didn't they made other arrangements.

 

'They Accept Us as We Are;' Christians Join Forces With Muslim Group Hezbollah to Fight ISIS in Lebanon

 

 

Rifit Nasrallah, a Catholic businessman who is part of the militias fighting ISIS in Ras Baalbek, discussed the alliance with Hezbollah in an International Business Times report last month.

"We're in a very dangerous situation," he said. "The only people who are protecting us are the resistance of Hezbollah. The only one standing with the army is Hezbollah. Let's not hide it anymore."

Nasrallah said Hezbollah does not expect its allies to convert to Islam or create an allegiance to the group's ideals.

"They accept us as we are," he said. "They do not impose on us anything. When there's an occasion, they come to our children's birthdays. The people here accept that Hezbollah comes and helps."

 

 

http://www.christianpost.com/news/they-accept-us-as-we-are-christians-jo...

besnook's picture

therein lies the biggest lie about islam as it is practiced. the people of the book are brothers. they only get in trouble if they try to forbid islam, in other words, if they don't treat islam as another part of the book and muslims as equal people of the book, kind of just like any other people treat people who don't like them. there is evidence of the acceptance of each other throughout the history of the levant....until israel showed up. that is the biggest problem with the current myth. that truth can never be divulged.

unsafe-space-time's picture

I guess israel make muzzies real horny for blonds and boys. And israel made them kill 270 million since muhamed trying "to proselytize"

besnook's picture

another innocent, victim jew. so tiresome. make sense if want a claim to any intelligence.

Billy the Poet's picture

Israel makes Americans cough up over $3 billion annually so that they can kill American sailors, contaminate American soil with nuclear waste and steal our defense plans as a gift to our enemies.

Grimaldus's picture

My "Dhimmiwit meter" just pegged full scale. Where did you get this bullshit?

Back to school for you. Make sure you study the life of mohammad and then move onto the koran and it's verses of violence.

Allah does not love unbelievers.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

 

 

 

 

 

Grimaldus

forestwind's picture

Acceptance of Christians is the reality in Muslim Iran. Likewise in Muslim Syria before the invasion. Likewise in Muslim Libya before the destruction. Likewise in Muslim Iraq before the slaughter.

CunnyFunt's picture

It's too late. Amendment XIX was the trojan horse.

1980XLS's picture

It's about time these feminists pay for their own Trojans.

max2205's picture

If you like your islam you can keep your islam 

JLee2027's picture

The Muslims have caused problems for nearly 1500 years with their backward Satanic thinking. Anyone who is fooled by them does not know truth.

peddling-fiction's picture

Just follow the moon to madness...

Billy the Poet's picture

Those crazy Muslims think that Jesus will come at the end of days and judge humanity. Scary stuff.

sun tzu's picture

Like Linda Sarsour, you leave out a few other inconvenient truths.