Intelligence Sources Reveal: Obama Used British Agents For Trump Wire Tap Surveillance

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Mac Slavo via,

While President Obama has vehemently denied issuing direct orders to the Justice Department or other domestic agencies to monitor President Trump during the 2016 election campaign, it is common knowledge that the National Security Agency has the ability to access video and audio from any number of devices in real time. In fact, according to Edward Snowden and documented in the recently released Snowden motion picture, U.S. spy agencies can simply flip a switch to watch or listen in on anything going on in a particular room by turning on a particular device’s cameras and microphones.

Here’s how it works:

The technology is real, but according to legal scholars, would have been illegal to use on Donald Trump or his surrogates without a warrant or probable cause indicating links to terrorist organizations.

But while domestic spy agencies like the NSA and CIA can’t actively monitor a citizen on U.S. soil, there is a very convenient work-around that has been used for over a decade to accomplish this task without technically breaking the law.

According to three intelligence sources who spoke with Judge Napolitano, this is exactly what President Obama did to then-candidate Donald Trump.

Steve Watson explains:

Three separate intelligence sources believe that former President Obama veered ‘outside the chain of command’ and employed British surveillance agents to conduct surveillance on Donald Trump’s team prior to the election, according to a legal analyst.


Judge Andrew Napolitano revealed on ‘Fox & Friends’ this morning that the sources spilled the details to him as the controversial case continues to dominate headlines.


Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command,” Napolitano said. “He didn’t use the NSA, he didn’t use the CIA, he didn’t use the FBI, and he didn’t use the Department of Justice.”


“He used GCHQ.” Napolitano explained.


“What the heck is GCHQ? That’s the initials for the British spying agency. They have 24/7 access to the NSA database.” The Judge explained.


Napolitano noted that this was done to secure plausible deniability. In other words, even if the Obama administration did spy on Trump, there may never be a way to prove it.


“So by simply having two people go to them saying, ‘President Obama needs transcripts of conversations involving candidate Trump, conversations involving president-elect Trump,’ he’s able to get it, and there’s no American fingerprints on this. ”Napolitano added.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
jeff montanye's picture

or at least getting that masters and moving on to the community college where they're legal.

Manthong's picture

If you live in DC, you have pizza sauce and cheese all over your face and into your ear drums...

not to mention your private parts and orifices.

Yog Soggoth's picture

No Connection. Ok, maybe you are legally right. Maybe you are lawfully wrong. 90 Professors and Staff Arrested for Child Rape And Torture I actually got there from Scott Weiner (democrat) from San Francisco via Artists, Satanists, life livers that encourage others to to whatever they want. See you in court?

stecha's picture

What a crock of shit this faggot has. Hey wikileaks shows proof. you just show you can spell. What a cunt..

swmnguy's picture

BaBaBouy:  You wrote, "Sooooo, Charge Obama?" (this thread is a bit tangled so I'll spell it out).

No.  We won't charge Obama.  Because there's nothing to charge.

This is the problem with all this Authoritarian police state bullshit.  It's all perfectly lawful if the process is followed.  There's no law prohibiting the British spies from spying on Americans, and telling American spies what they found.  It might get a little sticky if the Americans wanted to take that information into court.  So, they thought of that too; they have their own secret court, so the American spies could go to the secret court with a very specific (suspiciously specific?  I bet they've thought of that too...) application for a warrant.  They get the warrant, they cook up a lawful way to get to the information they already have, and it's all as clean as can be, fresh as a daisy.

This is part of what Snowden revealed, which shouldn't have surprised anyone anyway.  He, by the way, didn't work for the NSA.  He worked for Booz Allen Hamilton, a private corporation hired by the NSA.  So no, the NSA wasn't spying on Americans, perish the very thought!  Booz Allen Hamilton was spying on Americans!  The laws limiting spy agencies don't apply to Booz Allen Hamilton, so there's nothing unlawful about it!  The very idea!  (visualize Margaret Dumont, the angry lady from the Marx Brothers movies here...)

So the long and the short of it is, Trump was under surveillance.  And it was all 100% perfectly and completely lawful.  Just as it is the way you are under surveillance, and I am under surveillance.  That's what all that PATRIOT Act shit meant.  That's why people are so full of shit when they say, "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."  Authoritarian fans of State Power and State Violence just love all this.  It applies to them, too, though, and their values only seem to apply based on who is in power at which time.  That's the problem with all of it.

NoDebt's picture

Shit, meet fan.  Fuck you, Obama.  Choke on that a while.  Always knew you were dirty.  People getting wire tapped left, right and center all throughout your administration (AP, Fox News, not to mention all of our allies across the globe, etc.) but you had nothing to do with it?  Bullshit, you fucking liar.  Nobody would dare do something like this without at least your tacit approval.

They burned Nixon to the ground for doing less than 1% of what you've done.  Please continue to deny you had anything to do with it.  It's gonna be a blast watching you throw your people under the bus one after another to save your own miserable ass.  

847328_3527's picture

Time for Hitlery and Soweeto to see some jail time. Maybe a vacation spot like Gitmo.

25or6to4's picture

I hope Trump makes bathhouse Barry regret not ever closing down Gitmo like he promised.

king leon's picture

Hitlery will more likely receive a vaccination long before your vacation in Gitmo. 

JuliaS's picture

Obama deserves to be sent to Gitmo. That'll teach him the importance of sticking to campaign promises.

j0nx's picture

If you think anyone with skin darker than a sheet is going to get arrested for any of this then you are nuts. OTW's all have a get out of jail free card.

Taffy Lewis's picture

The MSM will just run a nice, feelgood story of Chalky and the Wookie happily enjoying their new digs in DC (like Bill & Hillary arm in arm, dancing on the beach) - and all will be forgotten. 80% of Americans won't ever hear about Obama's use of the British spy agency.

Chupacabra-322's picture

@ NoDebt,

Agreed. However, absolutely No One will get Arrested, Tried, Convicted & Executed. Why you ask?

Because it's open in your Criminality & Lawlessness. And, we're completely Lawless.

Precedent is being set right before our eyes. Totalitarian, Authoritarian Fascist rule.

Intelligence Agencies all built on the British Model of Intelligence. Purely Evil & Highly Compartmentalized Levels which function as a Step Pyramid Model of Authority / Monarch Reign Pyramid Model of Authority.

swmnguy's picture

Worse still, it's all 100% lawful and legal.  That's the real problem.  Lawlessness, sure, that's a problem.  But what's completely lawful is maybe a worse problem.

Yog Soggoth's picture

Nixon was fix'en to do a Kennedy. tHAT MEANS MESS WITH THE CURRENCY.

stocktivity's picture

So therefore somewhere there is a transcript of Sessions meeting with the Russians.

swmnguy's picture

Of course there is.  There's a transcript of whatever you might want a transcript of, real or imagined.

The tricky part is getting the transcript a line of provenance that would make it admissible in court.  That doesn't matter if everything is to be kept on the down-low, but it matters a lot if you want to go public.  There's a procedure to clean it all up and get it lawful, of course, but that's not trouble-free.  They'd have to go through the process, which might carry political costs not worth the trouble.

Notveryamused's picture

Trump should be pissed at U.K. If UK admit and apologise that would be great for Trump and securing prosperous relations for the next few years.

kellys_eye's picture

Internal monitoring is not permitted but "you monitor ours and we'll monitor yours" seems to be fine......

SRV's picture

S/B but you don't think the Clinton Slime Machine Bots will do anything on this do you... except maybe mock the "FOX News Conspiracy Theory based on un-named sources!"

Still don't understand where the resistance to this media war on the POTUS is?

Million Man march... from Atlanta A/P to CNN Headquarters!

JRobby's picture

I might utter: "unravel" when Oblivio, aka "The Manchurian Kenyan" is in custody.

Chupacabra-322's picture

@ froze,

It's unraveling all right. Slowly but the Deep State is completely exposed, weakend & unraveling at the seems. More will come. Stay tuned.

White Hats 1

Black Hats 0

SoDamnMad's picture

So now I am deploarable AND a loose end? Shesh

NoDebt's picture

Behind closed doors I guarantee they call us far worse things than that.


playnstocks's picture

The'll say it to our faces! Losers....

HRClinton's picture

Hicks, Hillbillies, Low brows, Neanderthals, Rubes...

stocktivity's picture

This story is not on any of the main news networks

S Spade's picture

you're an idiot ahkmed, err xythras.  how many ids do you have?

Jim in MN's picture

They would only have done it for Hillary/Podesta. 

Still, the Circa News stuff that Hannity's been reporting indicates two, separate US investigations so this doesn't really add up.

May be a third, worse wiretap. 

Ignatius's picture

It's all tied together at the top, so the US have the Brits work the tap, and visa versa to evade domestic laws.

See:  The Safari Club.  Note that "Safari" tells us how they think about us proles.

halcyon's picture

Obama is a single sock-puppet. He just took orders.

And nobody hates Israel in US top echelons.

If they did, they'd pull out their implicit and expliticit support, stop giving them money (billions per year) and put them in trade embargo and call for sanctions in the UN.

USA will never do this, because it is run by the masters.


Yog Soggoth's picture

How long can the house of Saud keep up the charade in that neighborhood? One of the last kingdoms on Earth.

Everybodys All American's picture

Whether or not he is simply someone's puppet is irrelevant. He knew what he was doing was wrong. I believe a case can be made for criminal activity that he knew about and approved. The same goes for the bail in of Obamacare through dividends stolen from Freddie and Fannie Mae. I believe he committed high crimes and misdemeanors in this case of fraud in securities. He will be more than likely pardoned but I conclude he's committed treason so often that he's made it normal activity.

veritas semper vinces's picture

Yea,he hated them so much that he gave them 38bil,had mostly jooos in his gov. and continued Israhell plan Oded Yinon

poeg's picture

Duh... Five Eyes anyone? You Yanks do know your data is sent to Canada for examination? All that gear we're using here isn't anything WE purchased.

Belrev's picture

The full video with Judge Napolitano on Fox News is here. Interesting stuff.

BandGap's picture

This started with Project Echelon in the 1960s.

At some point it was good enough to turn around and spy on us. Technology, and embedding chips in all sorts of things, makes this really easy.

brianshell's picture

Three points to ponder.

1. The NSA has total intercept of all communications in the US.

2. The president can spy on anyone in the US without a warrant.

3. A foreign power has direct access to the NSA database without the need to ask permission from the US.

All three of these points are un-American and unconstitutional.

Jim in MN's picture

Paging Theresa May, your opportune scandal is calling on The Red Phone......PM May, pick up.....

HRClinton's picture

DJT simply has to get the British PM, Theresa May, to order the GCHQ to confirm the Trump surveillance and that thd request originated from US interests.

Scuba Steve's picture

... And then Critternuts chimes in ...

halcyon's picture

This is a page from the classic playbook. You don't spy on your citizens (technically) you put your budddies in the Five Eyes to spy on them.

Everybody does this and has been doing ever since Echelon (maybe even earlier).

Nothing new under the sun.

Trump will do the same, if he is wise.

It's one of the tools in the arsenal and NOBODY can stop it, it has way too much vested interest of MIC-WallSt-money-laundering-CIA-black-budget behind it. It is one of the heads of the hydra. Google for Danny Casolaro and Octopus and you will get one hell of a rabbit hole that just goes deeper and deeper.

Don't complain Trump, use it to destroy your enemies.


exi1ed0ne's picture

Using evil to do good is still evil.  I get that it provides a strategic and tactical advantage over your enemies, but that's not why J6P elected him.  They want him to tear unconstitutional bullshit like this down.  He's never going to for the reasons you mention though, so civil war 2.0 is still on schedule.

crossroaddemon's picture

Civil war 2.0. Really. Who's gonna fire the first shot, tough guy... you?

Publicus_Reanimated's picture

It does not matter who fires the first shot.  What matters is how many people say "I'm with him!" afterward.

crossroaddemon's picture

My point is that nobody is going to fire the first shot, because nobody wants to be made an example of.