Is Denmark On The Brink?

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Erico Matias Tavares via Sinclair & Co.,

Iben Thranholm examines political and social events with focus on their religious aspects, significance and moral implications. She is one of Denmark’s most widely read columnists on such matters. Thranholm is a former editor and radio host at the Danish Broadcasting Corporation (DR), at which she created a religious news program that set a new standard for religious analysis in the newsroom. She has traveled extensively in the Middle East, Italy, the United States and Russia to carry out research and interviews. She has been awarded for her investigative research into Danish media coverage of religious issues.


E Tavares: Iben, thank you for being with us today. Over a year ago we talked to Dr. Tino Sanandaji, an economics professor at a leading Swedish university, on the inconsistencies of Swedish immigration policies. The resulting post was hit, revealing a significant interest for this topic. 

In a sense Sweden is the canary in the coalmine of Europe’s demographic future, since they have been at the forefront of this transformation and openly embrace it. Being a close neighbor we would like to get your views on what is happening there, as well as in Denmark. How do the Danes look at Sweden, with hope or apprehension? 

I Tranholm: With absolute horror! 

The Swedish media, which is quite pro-government and its leftwing policies, does not always report the full extent of the problems in their society. So it is hard to have a very accurate picture of what is going on. But we in Denmark have a good sense. We are very aware of the murders, rapes, riots, violence and the hand grenades that go on there. This does not often make the news but we know it is going on. And we don’t want to go down the same route. 

This is the result of decades of policies promoting multiculturalism in Sweden. And what is left is this hollow house. You know, in the Bible it is said that if a house is left swept, tidied and unoccupied it eventually it will be taken over by evil. And I fear that this is what is happening in Sweden. Far from being a multicultural paradise, the problems can no longer remain hidden. 

ET: Indeed, even President Trump made some controversial comments about Sweden at a recent rally in the US, causing an international uproar, with many debates on whether he was right or wrong. Did this cause some discussion in Denmark as well?

IT: It wasn’t much of a discussion because we in Denmark know what is happening in Sweden. Malmo is very close so we only need to go there to see it with our own eyes. 

There was a TV ad partially paid by the Swedish government recommending that all Swedes integrate into this new multicultural society they are creating. Think about that. Even old Swedes now need to adjust to this new reality, instead of immigrants adapting to Swedish society. They call it “Det nya landet”, which means the new country. Traditional Sweden is gone.

ET: Swedes and Danes share many cultural traits. What explains this divergence in opinions? Is it because you do not face the same societal problems? 

IT: We are not as politically correct as the Swedes. So there is a lot of discussion here. (…) As such we have a greater awareness of our heritage and tend to be more protective of it.

Which is not to say we don’t have problems. We do. We face the same identity issues, and our traditions – in particular our Christian heritage – are fast disappearing from our society. That same hollowness is now becoming mainstream in Denmark. And this eliminates much of the arguments to defend ourselves against the importation of foreign values and customs, many of which are at odds with our own. Simply forbidding things will not change this reality. 

ET: And how has integration been? Seems to be going better than other European countries since we don’t hear much about “no-go” zones and riots in your country, unlike France and Sweden, for instance.

IT: We have those problems as well but because Denmark is a small country you won’t hear about them as much. 

We have this belief here that welfare is the solution for everything. No matter who comes here from whatever part of the world will get housing, work, entertainment and healthcare. The government will give those to you with the expectation that if you have all those things you will happily assimilate into Danish society, learn Danish and adapt to our culture. As a result we will become a vibrant multicultural society. 

The reality is quite different. The relativism that this multiculturalism engenders ends up putting different sides of society at odds with each other, especially when their values and beliefs are very different to begin with.

When immigrants come to Denmark they may be taken care of, but they have no dominant culture that they can assimilate into, certainly not in the religious sense. We are completely devoid of God. And as a result they end bringing elements of their culture and religion which often create friction, misunderstandings and also crime. So Danish society becomes more and more divided as a result. 

ET: Politicians seem to be getting the message. Your parliament recently passed legislation to ensure that immigration would never reach a level that would threaten Danish national identity. What do you make of this?

IT: We have a very divided society here as well, even without considering the waves of immigration that have recently settled here. 

Half of the population wants open borders, mass immigration and welfare for all. They reject traditional values and are very much in favor of globalism and multiculturalism. The other half is very much opposed to that, but they lack any persuasive arguments to support that position. All they can do is to forbid immigration, forbid women from wearing a head cloth and so on. 

We no longer have a moral compass. Before, Christianity provided this role, keeping us united over centuries. Now we can no longer distinguish between good and evil, and ultimately this is what this struggle comes down to. Without this any preventive measures like this are just quick fixes that will not solve anything over the longer term. What is needed is a positive alternative in a moral sense. 

ET: Is there any data or independent studies on the benefits and costs of immigration in Denmark? In Sweden for instance this topic is almost taboo, but there are many concerns in terms of finding good employment opportunities for immigrants, coming from the immigrants themselves in fact.

IT: With this new culture we have adopted in the West we stopped having enough children to support our welfare state. So yes, one argument is that we need more people to support it. 

In our own very secular society the state is God. It is supposed to provide and care for everybody. So the economic arguments become less relevant. Of course they are consideration since people are paying for these policies, but in a sense they are secondary.

ET: We are at the cusp of an automation wave that threatens to displace millions of workers across the developed world. This will raise even more concerns regarding mass immigration, which traditionally consists of lower skilled workers. Is there any discussion in Denmark about this?

IT: No. The only discussion is around the cultural aspect, namely the impact on our values and traditions. 

And in a sense this just shows how weak we are. For instance, there are only 250,000 Muslims in Denmark, so a tiny minority. And yet the majority of our political debates focusing on culture over the last ten years have largely revolved around Islam. That’s how weak our culture has become.

So while as an open society there is resistance to women having to cover themselves up, having separate swimming pools for men and women and so forth, we have lost the argument to combat these imported traditions largely because we have lost our Christian roots and values. So over time they will become more prevalent in our society. We are already seeing it.

ET: Secular Muslims may also lose out a result. Many cherish Western values but will increasingly find a native society that is at odds with them, as their own communities become more extremist. Many complain that the Islam in Denmark and other European countries is more hardcore or even radical than in their home countries.

IT: That is true. And again that is largely a result of this cultural hesitation in the societies that host them. As a result, those more aggressive forms gain more ground to the detriment of everyone, especially women. 

ET: Much of the developing world faces a difficult situation and undoubtedly the countries that can help should. Let’s face it, faulty Western foreign policies have made bad situations even worse across much of the Middle East, although other very important sectarian and ethnic conflicts play a large role as well. 

There are those who suggest that instead of opening the borders this help should be provided at the origin, which would be cheaper and thus could help many more people, would place refugees closer to their homes and avoid many of the social problems we are unfortunately seeing across Europe – caused by a minority to be sure, but still very problematic. What do Danish politicians think about this?

IT: That would be logical in many ways, but again the debate is not economical. People want to be perceived as doing good, meaning opening their communities, welcoming and caring for others. 

I would be in favor of that if we were talking about women and their children, even families. But the reality is different. The majority of people we have welcomed in recent years, especially following the migrant crisis, are fit young men. They bring their conflicts and their frustrations with them, creating a difficult environment for everyone. 

So yes, arguably it would be more efficient to provide care at the source but this is not how the debate is framed.

ET: Denmark is supposedly the happiest country on the planet. But you have little reason to be happy these days as you find yourself on the receiving end of government censorship, not only for expressing your concerns about the future of your country but also for working for a Russian news outlet. What happened here? You recently wrote a powerful piece about this, expressing your feelings not only as a woman who does not toe the party line but especially as a Christian. 

IT: In 2015 I wrote an article criticizing our politicians who for the most part hate Christianity but nevertheless use Christian values, especially charity and compassion, to promote their own agendas, in particular mass immigration. So I called them out on that.

A few months later I got a call from a politician here who told me that I was on a government blacklist, supposedly acting as a pro-Russian propagandist agent, despite having absolutely no evidence to that effect. I occasionally work for a Russian news outlet, but that’s simply my job as a journalist. 

Today, in a society where supposedly there is freedom of speech, if politicians want to silence their critics they simply accuse them of working for the Kremlin, or having some unexplained ties with Russia. That is what happened to me, and it also happening to high profile politicians and journalists in the US, France and Germany. If you don’t agree with the multicultural policies of Europe then you are labeled a Russian agent. Which is really a form of political or character assassination. 

They are so afraid of the rise of what leftist politicians in Europe call “populism”, which threaten the existence of their beloved European Union. And this year the stakes are very high with elections in France and Germany. So they resort to these kinds of tactics to quash any dissenters. 

So I find myself in a blacklist in a supposedly free country like Denmark, but if a conflict with Russia emerges I can end up in prison under the pretext of being a foreign agent. Again, with no proof and no judicial process. This is very much how totalitarian societies operate. First they put you on a list, then when there is a problem or a made-up reason they will come for you.

ET: You were only expressing views that are consistent with those of many conservatives on both sides of the Atlantic. There are certainly many people concerned about the future of Western societies. In many ways this evokes memories of the Soviet Union, and the great new society they tried to create, with the disastrous consequences we all know.

That is actually a very real and concerning comparison. After all, communism was a Western idea and it was imposed on Russia, they did not create it. And it did not die with the collapse of the Soviet Union. On the contrary, it is still very much alive and roaming around our continent. While it operates differently, the goals are not too dissimilar. The version we have spreading across the West is Cultural Marxism.

We no longer have families, religion, even genders. In Sweden now they have invented a gender neutral term to address little boys and girls at kindergarten. This is a complete change from traditional Western values that have kept Europe safe from outside invasion for centuries. And this is now gone. 

All this talk of multiculturalism and open borders sounds very nice, but in practice it has led to a progressive transformation of our societies, and as Sweden shows not for the better. Less freedoms, less safety, less cohesion; more crime, more fragmentation, more social problems. It really is a struggle of good versus evil, and we in the West can no longer distinguish between the two. I would even call it diabolical disorientation. 

ET: So how long you think before the Christian cross is removed from your flag? And how does the Danish monarchy, which is sworn to protect Danish culture and religion, feel about all of this?

IT: No European politician will stand up for Christianity. Nobody. Expect from perhaps Hungarian Prime Minister, Victor Orbán. 

There is this unholy alliance between the left and radical Islam. Many Europeans have such a disdain for their own traditions that they would prefer to see Christianity being eradicated even if it might cost their way of life and even personal freedoms in the end. 

We have this bizarre situation where Western feminists support women having to wear a head cloth, along with foregoing many of the rights they should be able to enjoy in our countries. And these women often get penalized by their own communities when they try to assimilate into our society, while the feminists stay quiet. It is all very multicultural and good.

ET: You know Russia well as part of your work. Can you contrast what is happening there relative to the transformation taking place across much of Western Europe?

Believe it or not, we have swapped lanes. Now it is Russia who is adopting Christianity as the West gets rid of it by any means possible. 

Christianity runs very deep in Russia: in their literature, in their arts, in their culture. When the Soviets brutally tried to suppress it, at the cost of countless lives, it survived underground. People still celebrated it in secrecy, performing baptisms and the like behind closed doors. 

President Putin recently inaugurated an enormous statue of St. Vladimir, the patron saint of the Russian Orthodox Church, about 100 yards from the Kremlin walls. If you stand at a certain point across the street from the Kremlin, the cross that he bears is even taller than the star in the Red Square, so the symbolism is very potent. 

In the West, as we discussed, we are going the other way. We can’t discard our values and heritage fast enough. 

ET: There was a 2014 Russian movie, Leviathan, which alluded to this transformation. However it put Orthodox Christianity in a less positive light, essentially being used as an ideological argument to justify the power of the oligarchs in society. President Putin is certainly no saint. Isn’t this all just superficial?

IT: There are people in Russia who are also opposed to their own traditional values and who want a more Westernized Russia. I have not seen that movie so I can’t say if the director supports that view or not. 

People need to go to Russia and see it for themselves. President Putin is only responding to what is happening there and he respects the Russian people’s faith in Orthodoxy.

This is one of the reasons why I believe the West hate the Russians so much. They cannot tolerate the thought of having a resurgent and powerful Christian Russia who openly rejects their Cultural Marxism. And accordingly they demonized it in much of our media and political circles.

ET: So, is Denmark on the brink? Indeed, is the rest of Europe on the brink?

IT: Yes, Denmark is on the brink. And Europe is on the brink. We completely lost our culture, our values and our moral compass. What used to be good is now evil and vice-versa. 

You mentioned Denmark being the happiest country in the world but I am not sure that is true. We have high alcohol consumption and about half a million people on happy pills for a reason. 

Channel 1, our main TV channel here, recently aired a documentary on three Danish girls who converted to Islam out of their own will, not because they got married or anything like that. They all had the same background, coming from broken homes, dealing with alcoholism and so forth – basically part of the legacy of the 1968 revolution we had across Europe. What these girls lacked was structure, and they found it in Islam because it regulates all aspects of your life: how you dress, what you eat, with whom you can socialize with, how to pray, how to interact as a wife and so on. 

That is what the right-wing parties in Europe don’t understand. This is a spiritual battle. There is no political freedom without spiritual freedom. If you go around just forbidding things, like don’t wear the head cloth and so forth, it will not work. Our civilization will gradually disappear.

The only thing that can save Europe right now is a true spiritual, dare I say Christian, revival across the Continent. This played a significant role in the demise of communism in the Soviet Union and East Germany. The churches there provided hidden venues for people to congregate, express ideas and share their faith and hardships.

Since its inception Christianity was always about fighting evil with love, prayer and faith because these three are the key to freedom. And these are the values that the radical left and radical Islam do not tolerate, because of course both demand total obedience to the state and their conception of God, respectively. 

ET: Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and your courage. You deserve to be in the cover of a magazine, not on some government blacklist. Wish you all the best.

IT: Thank you.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
wildbad's picture

that "nordic" woman has more balls than you could ever find.

Mr 9x19's picture

dear eu contries, keep voting socialists fucked politics and pls shut up  while put some more coliseum tv entertainment.

whoooo let the muzzz in , whooo, whooo whooo

whoooo let the muzz in .....


love that tune,  you should like it too, before you disapear in misterious conditions

buckstopshere's picture

The people need to examine the long-term direction of their country.

Tradition and culture give the people their identity. Without an enduring identity the people become strangers in their own land. They become lost amidst chaos and violence of their own choosing or neglect.

knukles's picture

Let's get right to the matter at hand.  It is about civilization.  That which we term Western Civilization.  1,000's of years. 
Which used to have certain codes of conduct.  That people stuck to because they worked. 
That has been and continues to be supplanted, assimilated by and rendered useless as the state has taken, with our tacit approvals in the past, the control over our kid's moral and ethical teachings.

And this is what we get.  A state run amok, defining good and evil as may suit them from moment to moment, no rule of law remaining.

We are Engaged in the Eternal Battle of Good versus Evil. 


kochevnik's picture

Many low IQ liberals have become brainwashed into thinking that tolerating intolerance is liberal.  Tolerating intolerance is still intolerance.  Only eliminating intolerant fascism will restore the republic based upon inalienable individual rights.  Most fascism ultimately stems from religion, or the state religion of socialism

Socialism can exist to the extent that people stuck in ruts can be put back on the road to their chosen path.  For example, drug addicts need treatment and something to fill the void in their lives.  Instead western governments mainly seem interested in killing brown people and herding them into the ghettos of Western cities

Deathrips's picture

Thank Barbara Specter


Shes a grand wizard of the supremacists


BingoBoggins's picture

Great. We'll form a committee.

Teja's picture

And high IQ people understand that you cannot simply change intolerant people by force. You have to put them in situations where they have to learn to tolerate different opinions and people. Army, education or work experience for example. It is a "push and pull" situation - rules must be obeyed, eg respecting women, but there must be a positive incentive to integrate and become more tolerant, too. Learning tolerance also is a process which may take several generations. Strangely, it works faster for women than for men, in my experience.

Of course it becomes more difficult when there is IQ segregation - smarter young people leaving a dead-end home region for example. Or, maybe, stupid young people being thrown out from home by their more successful siblings. Don't know what happens more often.

Luckily, nowadays we have the internet where there is lots of communication between different groups.

CorporateCongress's picture

I think it needs to get worse before it gets any better.

Much worse. The wolf needs to rise and go all nazi on every one.

Thats far away though.

Squid-puppets a-go-go's picture

I'd hate to see it, but if the Left does not cease frustrating the reasonable aspirations of the Right, the Right will start to take unreasonable steps

And that means Holocaust Mk11, only this time the other half of the Semitic family will bear the brunt.

We have to ship them back to countries of origin without violence before WAR, and the fog of war under which a second holocaust could take place

BingoBoggins's picture

Unreasonable to whom? Those who write the History texts?

ffed's picture

Lol you said a seconda holocaust. ... better check up on the facts of the so called "first holocaust" start think fuel for do the math on whichever imaginary number you "believe" the bigger the number you choose, the more impossible  it becomes.

The Wizard's picture

Multiculturalism = No Culture. The MO of those in control is divide and conquer and rule with their culture.

Eph 6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
 11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
 12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
 13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
 14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;
 15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;
 16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
 17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:
 18 Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;

LA_Goldbug's picture

Because the State has been infiltrated by an aggressive virus who bases its Life Work on exploiting others. Specter in Sweden is its visible agent.

Grave's picture

native traditions and culture, not imported.

follow your ancestors native cultures and mythology,
be it nordic, celtic, slavic, greek, roman, etc.

dont trade all that rich and wonderful heritage for the bland and bleak terror of abrahamic death cults (sub-cults christianity/islam and control-cult judaism)
you really think these wonderful people are just going to lie down and die?

TheReplacement's picture

Lo, There do I see my Father
Lo, There do I see my Mother and my Brothers and my Sisters
Lo, There do I see the line of my people back to the beginning
Lo, They do call to me
They bid me take my place among them in the halls of Valhalla
Where thine enemies have been vanquished
Where the brave shall live Forever
Nor shall we mourn but rejoice for those that have died the glorious death.

kochevnik's picture

I approve of Orthodox Christianity as a wall to stop the overrun of the other two fascist religions, Judaism and Islam.  Of course all three are garbage founded on the zodiac, but they are all foundations of theofascism, and thus fascism.  One cannot simply remove one leg of the chair as the other two will simply tip society into disaster.  All religious fascism musts be incrementally and systematically reeled in using best weapon of man: reason

Orthodox christianity has made most Russians good people, but any religion unleashed without resistance will overrun mankind with barbarism and totalitarianism as magical thinkers have even fewer boundaries and judgement than methheads

caconhma's picture

There are no Slavic Russians in Russia since almost all of them were exterminated by Jewish Bolsheviks in 1917-1933.

Anothr 20-30 years, Germany, France, Sweden, etc. will look and behave like South Africa were only low-IQ whites are hoping for a future.

BingoBoggins's picture

Good day to be a Buddhist ... where's that confounded Path ...?

RightLineBacker's picture

"lost...chaos and violence"

Sounds a lot like the left's Progressive Liberalism

Which is actually Regressive Liberalism.

True Blue's picture

Frankfurt School.

When someone clearly and without equivocation states that the destruction of your civilization is their goal, the one and only end toward which they are working...

BingoBoggins's picture

... and then, quite mysteriously, they somehow fall off the face of the map ... go on?

BingoBoggins's picture

Bummer. What'll it be? Crash ... or WWIII first?

UmbilicalMosqueSweeper's picture

Consequently if the task of domestic policy -- besides the obvious one of satisfying the so called questions of the day -- must be the steeling and strengthening of a nation by means of a systematic cultivation and promotion of its inner values, the task of foreign policy is to correspond to and collaborate with this policy in order to create and to secure the vital prerequisites abroad. A healthy foreign policy, therefore, will always keep the winning of the basis of a Folk's sustenance immovably in sight as its ultimate goal. Domestic policy must secure the inner strength of a Folk so that it can assert itself in the sphere of foreign policy. Foreign policy must secure the life of a Folk for its domestic political development. Hence domestic policy and foreign policy are not only most closely linked, but must also mutually complement one another. The fact that in the great conjunctures of human history domestic policy as well as foreign policy has paid homage to other principles is not at all a proof of soundness, but rather proves the error of such action. Innumerable Nations and States have perished as a warning example to us, because they did not follow the above mentioned elementary principles. How little man thinks of the possibility of death during his life is a noteworthy fact. And how little he arranges the details of his life in accordance with the experiences that innumerable men before him had to have and which, as such, are all known to him. There are always exceptions who bear this in mind and who, by virtue of their personality, try to force on their fellow men the laws of life that lay at the base of the experiences of past epochs. Hence it is noteworthy that innumerable hygienic measures which perforce redound to the advantage of a Folk, and which individually are uncomfortable, must be formally forced upon the main body of a Folk through the autocratic standing of individual persons, in order however to disappear again when the authority of the personality is extinguished through the mass insanity of democracy. The average man has the greatest fear of death and in reality thinks of it most rarely. The important man concerns himself with it most emphatically, and nevertheless fears it the least. The one lives blindly from day to day, sins heedlessly, in order suddenly to collapse before the inevitable. The other observes its coming most carefully and, to be sure, looks it in the eye with calm and composure.

Such is exactly the case in the lives of nations. It is often terrible to see how little men want to learn from history, how with such imbecilic indifference they gloss over their experiences, how thoughtlessly they sin without considering that it is precisely through their sins that so and so many Nations and States have perished, indeed vanished from the Earth. And indeed how little they concern themselves with the fact that even for the short time span for which we possess an insight into history, States and Nations have arisen which were sometimes almost gigantic in size, but which two thousand years later vanished without a trace, that world powers once ruled cultural spheres of which only Sagas give us any information, that giant cities have sunk into ruins, and that their rubble heap has hardly survived to show presentday mankind at least the site on which they were located. The cares, hardships and sufferings of these millions and millions of individual men, who as a living substance were at one time the bearers and victims of these events, are almost beyond all imagination. Unknown men. Unknown soldiers of history. And truly, how indifferent is the present. How unfounded its eternal optimism, and how ruinous its wilful ignorance, its incapacity to see, and its unwillingness to learn. And if it depended on the broad masses, the game of the child playing with the fire with which he is unfamiliar would repeat itself uninterruptedly and also to an infinitely greater extent. Hence it is the task of men who feel themselves called as educators of a Folk to learn on their own from history, and to apply their knowledge in a practical manner [now], without regard to the view, understanding, ignorance or even the refusal of the mass. The greatness of a man is all the more important, the greater his courage, in opposition to a generally prevailing but ruinous view, to lead by his better insight to general victory. His victory will appear all the greater, the more enormous the resistances which had to be overcome, and the more hopeless the struggle seemed at first. - Zweites Buch


Teja's picture

Sounds like you are translating Oswald Spengler here, the "Zweites Buch" at the end a giveaway, if the style weren't enough of a giveaway.

Wouldn't translate Volk with Folk, though, better use "People".

His Decline of the West was a fascinating read in my youth, but trying to re-read it again some years ago, I got stuck. I still believe in his thought that history may repeat or at least rhyme within very long cycles (not the 4th turning stuff), but I do not believe any more that a certain path in history is unavoidable, ie that we are bound to develop into a society ruled by tyrants which in his theory is the step always following a democracy. 

Looking at current developments worldwide, this may seem counter-intuitive, but technology has developed so fast that it will give us lots of surprises we are now not even thinking about. Those suppressing freedom, often in the name of freedom, will not win in the long run, as they are forgetting that history will go on.



UmbilicalMosqueSweeper's picture

Zweites Buch - by Adolf Hitler

hansg's picture

They have. They see the evil populists (which they consider to be a throwback to the nazi party) and decide to oppose them in any way they can. The best way is of course to do precisely what the populists argue against, i.e. letting in more conquerors and embracing islam and multiculturalism. They don't see it's a viper they are letting into their house, they think of it as a trusted ally against the evil populists.

Identity? Of course they have an identity: they are the guilty ones, guilty of slavery, genocide, oppression, stealing all the riches of Africa and the rest of the world. Their identity is that of people who make all those old evils finally right, by giving without question, their wealth, their nations, and their future. And after they've done that they believe they can turn around, go home, and close the door and enjoy their feeling of being good people. After all, after penance comes forgiveness, right? Except that is a value of the religion they have just gone and exterminated - and they don't quite yet realize that for their chosen replacement, after weakness comes only defeat.

Still, I wonder if the muslims would really appreciate it if Europe embraced islam instead of Christianity. Islam pits the sons against the father; the family against the clan; the clan against the tribe. Would they enjoy it if the European tribes (with their massive technological advantages) would fight in earnest against their countries? Not holding back every step of the way, but simply fighting to dominate and exterminate with all of its power, as islam prescribes? Do they believe once we are all islamic brethren together, we would stop looking down on them as the goat fuckers they are? Don't they realize that once freed from the shackles of Christianity, their extermination is the only rational option for us - and there won't be any moral reasons not to anymore? Maybe they, like our leaders, believe they can ride the storm out and still come out on top. And for both parties, that is an exceedingly dangerous gamble.


Tallest Skil's picture

Deport all the invaders, shoot anyone who resists, and then kill anyone else who crosses the border. Anything else is suicidal (or, since it wouldn't be the people who wanted it, genocidal).

Koba the Dread's picture

I agree in spades! (No inuendo intended.) Kill or deport the descendants of everyone who entered the United States since July 4, 1776. They are all interlopers and opportunists who came here to suck off the America's tit. They're too short, too fat, have splayed feet and big noses. They also sweat too much.

Some of us were here from the beginning! We stole this continent fair and square and suffered mightily to do so. We roped it; we reined it in; we coralled it; we own it.

HockeyFool's picture

Please return to your safe space, snowflake.

Tallest Skil's picture

1. News flash, dipshit: whites were the first to settle the Americas.

2. Your strawman is irrelevant. "Being American" (being [insert country demonym here]) implies adherence to a set of rules AND beliefs. Nonconformity therewith means you are not American, and as such have no reason or right to be here.

3. You do not have the right to enter any country, at any time, for any reason. Your idiotic shitposting is predicated on the opposite of this concept, which is like being upset at a lion for killing you when you sat down in its den and expected to be given some of the meat from the hunt.

The lion is waking up again. Do you realize that the last time whites went to war with another race people were still riding into battle on horses? Then we dropped a single bomb that destroyed an entire city. And then we did it again. Imagine what retribution will befall you for the last seventy years of what you've done to us.

BingoBoggins's picture

Let's not forget the Glorious Conquistadors!

Ain't never was no Maztlan. Pequeña villa, motherfucker!

Teja's picture

1. The Solutrean hypothesis is nothing really new, but has been abandoned by most scientists due to DNA results from prehistoric Americans, and to severe gaps in the timeline.

2. Of course YOUR BELIEFS AND RULES are the ones defining who is American and who not.

3. If a country is defined by territory, population and government, the Native Americans had their own countries, and your ancestors did not request visa to settle in those countries afaik.

If "the lion is waking up again" means you will fight your countrymen for your BELIEFS AND RULES, please read your Civil War history first. Was not really worth it, I would say.

BingoBoggins's picture

Hear the lamentations of the women!

Nightjar's picture

No, or rather, denmark is no further on the brink than the rest of the west. They are actually one of the least worst of the west european cuck nations. Hail our white european peoples, reconquista 2.0 , Hail victory.

knukles's picture

You're even getting me excited!

lolmao500's picture

North Korea is on the brink. Russia-eastern europe is on the brink. The world economy is on the brink. The South China Sea is on the brink. The 2nd US civil war is on the brink. Turkey going nuts and invading Europe is on the brink.

The whole fucking world is BATSHIT INSANE

kochevnik's picture

We are not on the brink,  We have identified the problem.  By deamonizing Putin, the West has proven they are intolerant to moderation.  Hence they have validated the rise of Russian nationalism which will address Western fascism in a language it can understand

lakecity55's picture

I know from my Russian Studies in college, way back, how deep the Orthodox Church is in Russia. It is a Giant Crucifix which repels the Evil Vampire Assholios of Globalism, i.e., Global Cultural Marxism.

Vlad is Enemy #1 because he is standing up to the Assholios!

Long live Putin!
Long Live Trump!
Long Live Farage!
Le Pen, Wilders!

General Titus's picture

The mass murdering of Caucasians, the evil Bolsheviks, were kicked out when the nattive Orthodox Christian people collapsed the evil Soviet Union, and unfortunately for the US, Canada, Australia, & EU nations, they came to those nations and morphed into the Cultural marxist liberal Cuckservatives and Democrats. They are also known as Red Diaper babies

They need to be cleansed off the planet

LA_Goldbug's picture

Russia has paid a heavy price in the last 200 yrs. in this fight. Its greatest asset is geography. Anglo-Zionist are having a huge problem with this. Vampire Brzezinski thought he had it figured out but for the time being he has failed. Providence defeated him.

lakecity55's picture

Relax, Don Trumpleone can fix it, with Our help.


yogibear's picture

That's it, listen to the globalist libtards and you're fucked.

Keep following Merkel and the rest of the globalist libtards, it's a recipe for self destruction.

In the US, Barry has the snowflakes so confused they don't even know what gender they are. 

vato poco's picture

step one is to start saying "NO". say it to the welfare applicants, to the feminists, to the hajji invaders/"refugees", to the globalists and their pet media cheering all this on...

No is a complete sentence. it don't require explanation or amplification. and while they'll be told it sounds mean, it can save their lovely country. say it rather a lot, O Danes

lakecity55's picture

That's a big reason I voted in a long time, for Trump!

I knew I was right when he placed a portrait of General Jackson in a prominent place in the Oval Orifice. I have a copy of that same portrait on my wall, along with a good one of GW. I am still looking for a good one of General Lee or Thos. J Jackson.

Zarbo's picture

The addition of the muslim religion to your country will eventually overcome the entire population with its suppresive behavior.  No music, no singing, no dancing, no art -- except in the name of allah.  This will give the globalist elites the ultimate control on the population of Denmark.  Do not allow this.

lakecity55's picture

No, they do have very intricate and beautiful geometric art and tile work. However, I don't see giving up the Freedom to admire the Great Masters' religious paintings, or the creation of new ones.

Fuck Islam. They don't like it in the West, go back home! We should not be afraid because of Marxism's Diktats to run the fucksticks off.