Ron Paul: "Zero Chance" Assad Behind Chemical Weapons Attack In Syria; Likely A False Flag

Tyler Durden's picture

According to former Congressman Ron Paul, the chemical weapons attack in Khan Sheikhoun that killed 30 children and has led to calls for the Trump administration to intervene in Syria could have been a false flag attack.

As Paul Joseph Watson details, pointing out that the prospect of peace in Syria was moving closer before the attack, with ISIS and Al-Qaeda on the run, Paul said the attack made no sense.

“It looks like maybe somebody didn’t like that so there had to be an episode,” said Paul, asking, “who benefits?”


It doesn’t make any sense for Assad under these conditions to all of a sudden use poison gases – I think there’s zero chance he would have done this deliberately,” said Paul.

he former Congressman went on to explain how the incident was clearly being exploited by neo-cons and the deep state to enlist support for war.

“It’s the neo-conservatives who are benefiting tremendously from this because it’s derailed the progress that has already been made moving toward a more peaceful settlement in Syria,” said Paul.

Many have questioned why Assad would be so strategically stupid as to order a chemical weapons attack and incite the wrath of the world given that he is closer than ever to winning the war against ISIS and jihadist rebels.

Just five days before the attack, U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said, “The longer-term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people,” implying a definite shift in U.S. foreign policy away from regime change in Syria.

Why would Assad put such assurances in jeopardy by launching a horrific chemical attack, allowing establishment news outlets like CNN to once against use children as props to push for yet another massive war in the Middle East?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Never One Roach's picture

The "moderate backed rebels" wearing Nike sneakers are most likely responsible.

Lets ask McStain under oath.

froze25's picture

Who in their right mind believes that Assad did this? No one. The whole Western World / Saudi's and their lapdogs are just waiting for a reason to destroy him. There is zero motive and zero to gain from him doing that. I don't believe it for a second. Also we all know the Moderate Rebels might as well be called Unicorns because the don't exist. Moderate Rebel = ISIS = Rouge CIA

scraping_by's picture

And, of course, we've been here before. Was 2013 so long ago?

froze25's picture

No it was not, I think the Puppet masters don't realize that our memories are fairly deep these days, well at least for us that are not Zombies that think they are some how liberals because they support totalitarian ideology.

QuantumEasing's picture

Shhhhh, we don't want none of that rational, logical truth here boy. (/s in case it wasn't obvious).

Woar! Dow 25K!

And Moderate Rebel = kind of pregnant

SoilMyselfRotten's picture

Umm Mr. Prez, should have an opening for a senior advisor handy......

stormsailor's picture

that sleazy bastard would just lie and have his fingers crossed

Mr. Universe's picture

I wonder, shouldn't we set up a suite at the Hanoi Hilton for him so he can feel like he is with friends?

Lets ask McStain under oath.

We can fly in Jane Fonda to take his confession.

TheRideNeverEnds's picture

Because Lockheed doesn't sell jets to the civilian market and about one out of ever four Americans with a job are directly employed by the government or because of it.

Won't matter if we never find WMDs there, the military contracts have no refunds.

lil dirtball's picture

> no longer a threat

Ron Paul was never a threat to begin with. He's a lackey - and always has been. He's a pied-piper, whose job it is/was to lead Constitutional/small government minded people into the desert - and keep them there.

And so, here we are.

Prove me wrong.

Pro-tip: you can't.

Yog Soggoth's picture
Arizona Becomes Second State to Approve Gold ... - Yahoo Finance That does move money into the desert as you claim, but that can still be owned by people from other States and Countries. Pro-tip, a scarab beetle might roll you up and bury you into a hole with larvae. Watch out for that dirtball. Oh, and I just did prove you wrong. Gold is money.
ThirdWorldDude's picture

"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act."

To Hell In A Handbasket's picture

The answer would be Ron Paul dead and the blame placed on Putin. It would be official because the MSM would have proclaimed so.

Pie's picture

Nope, Ron is unaware of the fact that Putin is dead after the war in Ossetia and since january 2010 was replaced by the CIA

Its a "Punch and Judy" puppet show, and since 2010 CIA-controlled impersonator "Putin2" plays that classic evil clown "Mr.Punch". 

This show is not for free. The "Deep State" wants to collect the price from the unwilling audience: USA and W.Europe are to pay in money, rights and freedoms, Russia and E.Europe are to pay in resources and millions of lives. 


Differences between Vladimir Putin before 2010 and “Vladimir Putin” after 2010 (Putin2) can be seen on the following issues: 

1) Personality. Putin: hard-working, humble, sober, intellectual, direct and democratic, wide horizon of vision, systemic approach, attention to detail. Putin2: doing-nothing lazy slacker, populist talk and Mr.obvious, drinker, narrow minded and shallow, general phrases. 

2) USA. Putin: ally of the USA, open to criticise mistakes (Iraq 2003), ready to provide assistance (2007 Gabala offer to monitor Iran). “Putin2”: a fake image of an “alternative power”, participates in the USA organised war in Syria. 

3) Oligarchs. Putin: all oligarchs should be “equally distanced” from the state (ravnoudaleni), justice to the crimes of Berezovsky and Khodorkovsky. Putin2: Khodorkovsky released, oligarchs are making all decisions to their benefit. 

4) Ukraine and Tavrida. Putin: supported Ukraine democracy+integrity; 29 August 2008: “Crimea is not a contested territory... Russia recognised the present borders of Ukraine.” Putin2: Recognised CIA coupdetat in Kiev and referendum in Tavrida (Crimea+Sevastopol), yet rejected referendums in Donetsk and Lugansk. 

5) Molotov-Ribbentrop. Putin condemnation of the treaty: at Russia-EU Summit on 10 May 2005; at WWII commemoration on 1 September 2009 in Gdansk. Putin2 rationalises the treaty in 2014 and 2015. 

6) Deutsch. Putin: fluent in German: Bundestag in 2001, Nord Stream with Schroeder in 2005, press conference at G8 in 2007. “Putin2”: lacks German: 2011 communication at Nord Stream launch, Putin car with German journalist in 2012 in Moscow, Merkel in 2013 in Ekaterinburg. 


P.S. Check Putin’s photos at the UN in 2005 and 2015. 



L Bean's picture

He had plastic surgery, genius. The "substance" of the rest of your hypothesis is similarily plastic.

Shemp 4 Victory's picture

If the head of shit, then keep quiet and don't disgrace yourself.

wcole225's picture

Think about an extended vacation

lil dirtball's picture

+1 not the real pooty-poot.

It's obvious to anyone with eyeballs to see and a brain to reason (not washed).

consider me gone's picture

Congratulations. You've been chosen to fly to Moscow to enlighten the Russians to this development. I suggest standing near the Kremlin with a bullhorn and shouting it at passerbys.

Breathial's picture

Two POTUS election cycles I had to write in his name.  If Trump hadn't run, it would have been three.

Chupacabra-322's picture

From Ron Paul:

"The announcement by President George HW Bush on September 11, 1990 about the new world order was well received. Prior to that time it was only the “conspiracy theorists” who constantly talked about and speculated about the New World Order. Neoconservative ideas had been around for a long time. They were endorsed by many presidents and in particular Woodrow Wilson with his goal of spreading American goodness and making the ”world safe for democracy” – none of which can be achieved by promoting war. In the 1990s the modern day neoconservatives, led by William Kristol and Robert Kagan, enjoyed their growing influence on America’s foreign policy. Specifically, in 1997 they established the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) for the specific purpose of promoting an aggressive foreign policy of interventionism designed to promote the American Empire. This policy of intervention was to be presented with “moral clarity.” “Clarity” it was, but “moral” is another question. Their goal was to provide a vision and resolve, “to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interest.”

It was not a surprise that admittedly the number one goal for the New World order was to significantly increase military spending and to be prepared to challenge any regime hostile to America’s interests. They argued that America had to accept its unique role as the sole superpower for extending international order as long as it served America’s interests. Although neoconservatives are thought to have greater influence within the Republican Party, their views have been implemented by the leadership of both Republicans and Democrats."

SmittyinLA's picture

He couldn't stomach enforcing federal immigration law, or lying to the American public saying he's gonna try, that's why Ron Paul isn't President.

Ron Paul is the peanut gallery, a voyeur, always telling us the obvious after the fact, he's wallpaper.

He's the guy that claps when the waitress spills her load of plates and says "I told you so"

ciscokid's picture

The president we never had.

funkyfreddy's picture

It wouldnt have made any difference anyway, its clear McCain is the one really running the country still.

MFL5591's picture

Smells of McCain/ Graham. 

The Wizard's picture

The reason Rand and Ron never got elected is because the Deep State/Shadow Government do not have them on the list of selectable people. Having control of the media and educational system which contols most people's reality made them a non choice.

As I wrote yesterday, Putin and Assad can't be that stupid knowing what is going on

meditate_vigorously's picture

When he ran there was a media blackout of his campaign. Then the Iowa Republicans stole the primary from him through election fraud.

Laddie's picture

Because Ron Paul opposed Jewish interests. Back in 2006 he was virtually the LONE VOICE against INCREASING military aid to Israel. I watched him on C-SPAN and he was LIVID! Everyone else was kissing AIPAC's butt but NOT Ron Paul, sadly Rand when he was first running for Senate met with AIPAC and got on his knees to them.

Ron Paul is OLD TIME America.
I recall when he was running for President and he spent over an hour in a New Hampshire gun store shooting the breeze with the owner and customers. SHOW ME ANOTHER POL who would do that? NONE.

Globalists and Neocons: Two potent forces opposing the Assad government in Syria Dr. Kevin MacDonald July 21, 2012

NY Times Journalist Who Lied About Saddam WMDs Now Claiming Assad Used WMDs

CONFIRMED: Chemical weapons in Idlib were stashed by terrorists

Something is Not Adding Up In Idlib Chemical Weapons Attack

Striker’s Analysis: The Jews Want This War!

This is the weasel who has turned Trump the wrong way:

Soros backed Trump son-in-law, Jared Kushner, in real estate venture with $259 MILLION:
George Soros was the man who provided Cadre with a $259 million line of credit. “Soros has had a long and productive relationship with the Kushner family.”

Good exposè of Kushner and his effect on Trump:
AUDIO April 3, 2017
Photo: Kushner- Zarchi

Sheeple-49's picture

Because Merica is a bunch of tards

loves the truth's picture

Lets really Make America Screwed up..

SmackDaddy's picture

But but but the jewsmedia would never lie about gassing people....

wildbad's picture

yeah, we know..what about Donald? WTF...doesn't he watch infowars?

Ghost of Porky's picture

Trump's "teh BABIES" speech made him sound like a complete moron.

Troll Magnet's picture

Yeah that shit sounded about as credible as Putin meddling in our election.

Mtnrunnr's picture

Maybe now that trump sees the shit they don't tell us he has realized that it isn't one huge jew conspiracy and that Assad actually is a fucking murder.

Troll Magnet's picture

Yeah and Tower 7 really fell due to high heat. Oh wai. Was I not supposed to talk about Bldg 7???

StackShinyStuff's picture

No because it was a figment of our imaginations. 

Akzed's picture

Not to mention bldgs 3,4,5&6.

moneybots's picture

It was a totally uncontrolled fire.

SoilMyselfRotten's picture

All those steel supports melted, yep, ALL OF THEM

Stranger_in_a_Strange_Land's picture

All at the same time, and all at the exact same spot in elevation relative to the it could all fall straight down.  Yep, that's how it went.

MEFOBILLS's picture

All those steel supports melted, yep, ALL OF THEM


Not to mention that Kerosene (jet fuel) burns in open air with a blue flame.  Your gas flame on your stove top is a blue flame.  Careful!  You might melt you steel skillet!

Was there ram air to increase combustion rate, like in a jet engine.  The last time I checked skyscrapers didn't have N1 Jet turbine blades.  Even then, a 1 inch thick piece of structural steel put in a jets exhaust wouldn't melt to liquid.

Then consider that heat rises, yet the building fell downward. 

Anybody with two brain cells to rub together should realize that "jet fuel" cannot bring down a steel reinforced sky scraper  - the thermodynamics are simply not there.

Then of course, there is building 7, which came down due to "office fires."  Ha Ha.  Jokes on us.  

Don't believe your lying eyes.

Yog Soggoth's picture

OK, I'll buy your theory for a dollar, but you have to accept my theory of global warming even though I am freezing in Florida tonight by my standards of course.(sarc) Most people have never tried to light kerosene. It is an old timey thing that worked, but the lamps are pretty much discontinued. Involved a wick, airflow, and a hand pump for fishing. Making kerosene do anything is a thought out process.

aardvarkk's picture

I don't believe there is a huge Jew conspiracy, and I also don't believe Assad is a fucking murderer in the least, or at least not anything like CNN tells you (I suppose when you lead a country in that area of the world you HAVE to be SOME kind of bastard or other).  Turn it off, or at least switch over the Netflix.  You will be better informed by Hollywood movies than you will by MSNBC or CNN or NYT or....

FringeImaginigs's picture

Or.  you don't always have to believe its a jew conspiracy, and you can believe at the same time that Assad is a fucking murderer, and you can have doubts whether he did or didn't commit the gas attack. All three positions are independent of each other. 

Ghost of Porky's picture

More likely that this was orchestrated by John McCain. He was just over there a few weeks ago.

Yog Soggoth's picture

That is not an option for America! Give us proof shill. Huh? What do you have? Nothing? You will have nothing tommorrow or a thousand years. You are on empty.

L Bean's picture

lol! Yeah turn to Netflix, for their exclusive hagiographies of Al-Nusra's White Helmets, and the Ukraine putsch nazis! LMAO