"The CIA Has Been Deeply Humiliated" - Ron Paul Interviews Julian Assange

Tyler Durden's picture

Having blasted the Trump administration for their hyprocritical flip-flop from "loving WikiLeaks" to "arrest Assange," Ron Paul made his feelings very clear on what this signals: "If we allow this president to declare war on those who tell the truth, we have only ourselves to blame." Today he sits down with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for a live interview...

"The CIA has been deeply humiliated as a result of our ongoing publications so this is a preemptive move by the CIA to try and discredit our publications and create a new category for Wikileaks and other national security reporters to strip them of First Amendment protections,"

Assange said in a preview clip from the interview below...:

Full interview below... 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Looney's picture


hypocritical flip-flop from "loving WikiLeaks" to "arrest Assange"

Making America Great Again… one flip-flop at a time.  ;-)


CuttingEdge's picture

Trump's done more flip-flops than a Florida beachwear shack in high season.

Looney's picture


Moving to DC and maintaining one’s integrity is as difficult as taking laxatives and maintaining the viscosity of one’s excrements.  ;-)


manofthenorth's picture

"If we allow this president to declare war on those who tell the truth, we have only ourselves to blame."


'nuff said

flaminratzazz's picture

Take it from Ron, to fix this all we have to do is vote no..

Simple.. so now who's to blame?

Oh wait.. I dont see where I can vote no..

Fvk, it is still my fault..

fvk you RP ya sellout POS.

M4DM4N's picture

Yup....fuck that sellout.  It's simple being the only "no" vote in congress on countless pieces of legislation for probably more decades than you've been walking the Earth.  "I don't see where I can vote no.."...Really??? You have that hard a time extrapolating some real meaning behind that statement???  Sorry RP failed whatever idealogical litmus test you had set up for the rest of mankind, but "fvk you RP ya sellout POS"???  Let me know when you find the righteous, honest pols for me to support with you.  Until then, see if you can try twisting those panties to the left to get them unbunched, fella.

Chupacabra-322's picture

The "Spoofing" or Digital Finger Print & Parallel Construction tools that can be used against Governments, Individuals, enemies & adversaries are Chilling.

The CIA can not only hack into anything -- they can download any "evidence" they want onto your phone or computer.  Child pornography, national secrets, you name it.  Then they can blackmail you, threatening prosecution for whatever crap they have planted, then "found" on your computer.    They can also "spoof" the source of such downloads -- for instance, if they want to "prove" that something on your computer (or Donald Trump's computer) came from a "Russian source"  -- they can spoof the IP address of a Russian source.

The take-away:  no digital evidence the CIA or NSA produces on any subject whatsoever can be trusted.  No digital evidence should be acceptable in any case where the government has an interest, because they have the complete ability to fabricate and implant any evidence on any iphone or computer.  And worse:  they have intentionally created these digital vulnerabilities and pushed them onto the whole world via Microsoft and Google.     Government has long been at war with liberty, claiming that we need to give up liberty to be secure.  Now we learn that they have been deliberately sabotaging our security, in order to augment their own power.  Time to shut down the CIA and all the other spy agencies.  They're not keeping us free OR secure, and they're doing it deliberately.  Their main function nowadays seems to be lying us into wars against countries that never attacked us, and had no plans to do so.

The Echelon Computer System Catch Everything
The Flagging goes to Notify the Appropriate Alphabet,,,...Key Words Phrases...Algorithms,...It all gets sucked up and chewed on and spat out to the surmised computed correct departments...That simple.

Effective immediately defund, Eliminate & Supeona it's Agents, Officials & Dept. Heads in regard to the Mass Surveillance, Global Espionage Spying network & monitoring of a President Elect by aforementioned Agencies & former President Obama, AG Lynch & DIA James Clapper.

Perimetr's picture

That pussy Trump got his ass kicked by the CIA

and now he agrees to fuck Assange

after Wikileaks helped get him elected.

Once again the US winds up with a crooked bastard president

who doesn't give a damn about ordinary Americans

including those who voted for him.

jeff montanye's picture

and the appropriate conclusions to be drawn become clearer with each passing day.

dynasties do fall.  nothing lasts forever.  bust 9-11 and the mossad, the likud, the cia, the nsa, the national republican and democratic parties, the media (already badly hurt by the election and its results) are taken down not a peg but the whole board.

if trump is being cagey and playing the long game, he still may prove useful beyond the first line above.  if not, the traditionalist, working class voter also has an obamatomy.  hope s/he sees things more clearly than the clinton partisans ever have.

BaBaBouy's picture

~ ~ ~ TWO American Heroes ~ ~ ~

alt right dude's picture

Such a shame Ron Paul is not POTUS.

He would have made such a fine President... in line with the founding fathers:

Once Upon a Time, Presidents Knew What Kept America Great

armada's picture

I'm wondering if Assange is not CIA psy-op?

Because the CIA could have killed him any time they want.

beemasters's picture

Wikileaks could be used by those who stand for Truth and those with other agendas. So I can see how Assange, unintentionally, could be useful for the CIA too.

Manthong's picture

Holy smokes….

“inverted pyramid of thought””


Describes the entirety of .gov

Pairadimes's picture

Here is a hypothetical conversation that hypothetically might have taken place several weeks after Trump's election:


Man in $6,000 suit: Mr, President, congratulations on your recent election victory. Thank you for responding to the 17 different senators who petitioned you to arrange a meeting with me away from the cameras and microphones.

Trump: It seemed to be a meeting that was going to make itself happen. I must say, it has made me curious as to your message and affiliation.

Man: Well, let's just say that I represent a rather well-connected and deeply resourced group of organizations and individuals with a vested interest in the nature of your leadership.

Trump: Could you be more specific?

Man: No.

Trump: And your reason for the meeting?

Man: I just want to express our concern. We want you to know that you have a fine family, and you have constructed quite the business empire, and we all thought it would be a shame if something bad happened to it.


Sam.Spade's picture

Maybe.  But I would bet instead that the Secret Service took him into the Whitehouse screening room and showed him a copy of an 8 mm movie taken from the grassy knoll at the moment Kennedy's head blew up, with the offending rifle barrel protruding into the lower left corner of the frame.

And then they suggested that his family should be his primary concern.

There is a reason why the Praetorian Guard eventually decided who would be Emperor in the late Roman empire..

AldousHuxley's picture

no, they took him to a video room and showed the clips on him


being a pussy with a limp c@ck and melana telling him to get more of them blue pills.


He talks big because of his insecurity.


After 100 days, Trump has proven that....


earleflorida's picture


you can't change the spots on a leopard...

nor the stripes on a tiger...

its a predacious thingy in this POS turncoat/traitor we once called our POTUS

fool me once, shame on you--- fool me twice, shame on me


earleflorida's picture

yeah, another martyr--- and whom should fill the void/vacuum --- 1000s moar!!!--- moar, resolute than ever... truth`tellers will virtually shot down the ussa gov't via malware/ DDoS atacks/and whatever tricks unbeknowst in spyware ....

you go Julian

Ps, you sir are a fucking asshole  

the_narrator's picture

Back in 2008 I saw Zbigniew Brezinski speak and he said that Hillary would not be the next president of the United States.  He said it unequivocally and with certainty.  This was very early in the primaries.  I think there is a faction in the deep state that really don't like Hillary for some reason.  She is pretty reckless....

Footprint's picture

I'm wondering if you're not Countintelpropsyops from an alphabet agency of any troll nation: Paranoia is as useful to you as it is to me.

divingengineer's picture

Does anyone really believe the CIA is humiliated?
Does anyone really believe the CIA gives a flying fuck?

chunga's picture

spam above, spam below, fuck you...logout, click

Sam.Spade's picture

You really think so?  You mean like it was 'great' when Regan was elected to cut the size of government?  Or Carter?  And now Trump?

Get real.  The Deep State is running the show.  If RP were elected POTUS, he would have been dead before he took office.  Or he would have been boxed in after taking it.  Or corrupted like all his predecisors since 1900.

There is only one solution to this problem, and it is NOT some belief in a 'leader' who will solve the problem for us.  If we want freedom, we must take it back ourselves.

In the case of Wikileaks or any other freedom-oriented individual, the only solution is refuge inside a fortress of anonymity.  If they know who you are, they can and will get you.

Easier said than done, right?  True, but no journey can be made with a single step.  The key is to begin walking.  Start by guarding your own data.  Use Tor, an open-source operating system, and a VPN located outside the country.  Next migrate to Bitmessage and learn to conduct as much of your finances as you can using Bitcoin.  Then on to Tails run from untraceable locations like coffee houses.  Finally, migrate to a safe hardware system like Puri.sm.

And don't say you 'have nothing to hide, so why bother'.  The short answer is that you have nothing to hide only if the government agrees, and they agree less and less every day.  The longer answer is that, by engaging in privacy practices when you don't need them, you both learn the techniques necessary to use them if you ever do need them and you provide cover for those who do need them now.  Because if everyone is on the list, no one is on the list.

The subject is more than can be covered in a blog.  I recommend you start by reading Thieves Emporium.  It's a primer on how The Deep State controls us and how we can fight back.  Written in the form of a fast-paced novel, it will keep you interested in the subject to the very end.  It even includes an appendix of sources that will lead you, step by step, through establishing your own data freedom.

The Daily Anarchist loved it and called it 'Barely fiction'.  The editors of The Daily Bell thought it was so good they ran it as a serial which you can read FOR FREE at http://www.thedailybell.com/editorials/max-hernandez-introducing-thieves....

Or you can buy a copy at Amazon (rated 4.6 in 119 reviews), Nook (same rating, fewer reviews), Smashwords (ditto), or iBook.

But whatever you do, don't wait for your elected officals to save you.  Because they won't.  You're on your own here, so get started.  If not for your own sake, then for the future of your children.


Giant Meteor's picture


The CIA is humiliated? And rightfully so, sewing all their bi-party unelected chaos around the globe.

We love Wikileaks! And I would add, this is the EXACT correct purpose for Ron Paul ...

Sooner or later, REAL patriots, and people of conscience must prevail, no matter how often they threaten to blow us up.

Talcott's picture

Aye, anyone who thinks getting into that posistion can just dictate his political whims is well...lol.  From T. Jefferson to Barry all have learned that the system is hard to alter for a reason.  And Trump having realzed this is hopefully playing, as you put it, the long game.  However his NAFTA flipping and tilting to WAR d anti Russian rhetoric are the most dissapointing for me.

PrayingMantis's picture


... here's more truth ...

... "Former CIA Counter Intelligence Officer Phil Giraldi spills the beans"  >>> https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fde_1493343945 ...


beemasters's picture

The CIA isn't concerned about the information leaked. They are humiliated by the public display of their ineptitude.

AldousHuxley's picture

CIA like many of the institutions living large on tax payers dime has shown that 


they have no legitimacy !!

So It Goes's picture


In America "swamp drains you".

Turns out Schumer was right when he said not to mess with the CIA because they can get you everyway to Sunday.

So sad - we are fucked.

sagramore's picture


The CIA is a company. A corporation.

But then again, so are you. You are incorporated when you get a driver's licence for example.

What do corporations do when tortious conduct happens? They go to court.

The question is, where? Find that out and you will find a way to 'wind down' the Company.

SAE6065's picture

Waterboard the TRUMPET with water from The Swamp. Dick Cheney probably wouldnt mind doing the honors on our lying POS President

brianshell's picture

The CIA? The agency that always has no comment? They should have just clammed up and said the wikileaks data was a joke. The sheeple would have dutifully sucked it all in. Instead the CIA got sucked in.

OverTheHedge's picture

You are absolutely right. This should translate into endless not guilty verdicts for paedophiles, stalkers, whistleblowers etc, except that it depends upon two things. One, reasonable doubt, and two, jurors. Good luck with that.

Either way, justice seems to have had a couple of knitting needles shoved into her eyes to make sure she never sees anything, ever again.

kellys_eye's picture

Surely that now means such 'evidence' is inadmissable in court?  Far from making their case against an individual, the revelation that this can even be done would cast doubt on the credibility of evidence used against you?

scoutshonor's picture

For some time now the evidence is not as important as the person.  They only consider the evidence if they want the person put away.  For a real life example consider that Julian is on ice while Hillarity is walking free and asking why we don't drone him.

flaminratzazz's picture

If we allow this president to declare war on those who tell the truth, we have only ourselves to blame."

Do you have any fvkin idea how many times I have heard that total bullshit about us having a choice? And here you are falling for that same old tired worn out "it is all your fault" b /c you didn't vote correctly and put the right people in power so now YOU have to suffer the consequences.


Ron Paul was the lone voice in the wilderness but it is OUR fault he didnt get elected pres? Maybe Ronnie should have started a movement? That old fvkin geezer kike Bernie has more pull than Ron..

But of course that too is your fault..ALL of them are lying backstabbing POS which is your fault as well

Politics. dontcha just love it?

manofthenorth's picture

We do not have the government that we asked for.

We do not have the government we would hope for.

We do not have the government that we would choose.

We have the government that we tolerate.

Withdraw your consent.........

it is the only non kinetic option you have.

jeff montanye's picture

or keep trying, whichever you prefer: tulsi gabbard 2020.

FIAT CON's picture

How many years have you been waiting for Ron Paul to start a movement?

 How many years ago did you start a movement?


BennyBoy's picture


It sure took those dumshits from CIA/NSA long enough to come up with the non state BS to try and stop whistle blowers.

That its incredibly wrong is SOP for those dum MF.


Caloot's picture

Hey, how's it feel to have psychic forks stabbing out your eyeballs?

enfield0916's picture

At least Ron Paul didn't get on his knees and suck Zionist dick like our dear Orange Jesus. Not even once!

flaminratzazz's picture

No but his son sucks enough jew cock for the both of them.

Like father like son?

CharlesBronson's picture

Well it didn't take a single page before the typical antisemetic crap starts again. This time the idea is that Obama was closer to Israel than Trump....that would be, what? Idiotic? Ya...it would be!


veritas semper vinces's picture

They both "suck" the same amount,Mr. BronsonStein

Urban Roman's picture

You should have voted for Vermin Supreme, then at least you'd have that pony.

I have no idea where all the down votes came from. It's like ZH is infested with fire ants or something..