Goldman Slashes Trump Tax Cut Forecast By Over 40%

Tyler Durden's picture

It took the market about 6 months to realize that contrary to initial expectations, Trump's fiscal reform would be substantially delayed and implemented in 2018 at the earliest, if at all. Next, it's time to take the machete to the total size of the program, which is what Goldman's chief political economist Alec Phillips did today when he reported that Goldman is lowering the firm's expectations for fiscal policy changes over the next year: "Rather than the $1.75 trillion/10 years tax cut we had previously assumed, we now assume a cut of $1 trillion" or a cut of over 40%. This reflects an expectation of a tax cut that could be considered close to revenue-neutral under the loose definition that congressional Republicans have been using.

What prompted the revision? The recent chaos in DC of course:

Recent developments regarding the investigation into the Trump campaign have further weighed on a fiscal policy process that was already bogged down by House passage of the AHCA, which will consume valuable time in the Senate, an uncertain outcome on the FY18 budget resolution, without which tax legislation would become much less likely, and a lack of clear forward movement on tax reform.

As a result, this is Goldman's new base-case for Trump reform:

the probability that tax legislation will be enacted by 2018 has fallen further, in our view, as a result of recent events. The last few weeks have taken a toll on President Trump’s approval rating as well as support for Republicans in Congress.... Over the last week, the President’s approval rating has averaged around 40%, and Democrats have led generic ballot polls over the last week by an average of 11 points.

* * *

It is also not clear how much support there will be for a simple tax cut. The White House has proposed a tax cut that we expect might cost $3-4 trillion over ten years but House Republican leaders have insisted on revenue-neutral tax reform that does not add to the deficit and earlier this week, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called for revenue-neutral tax reform as well. While their definition of “revenue-neutral” includes dynamic scoring and other technicalities that might be worth several hundred billion dollars over ten years, even under a loose definition of “revenue neutral” this would seem to preclude a substantial net tax cut.


In light of these developments, we are changing our fiscal policy assumptions. We already assigned a very low probability to comprehensive tax reform by 2018 but recent events make it even less likely in our view. Our base case has been that Congress would enact a reasonably simple corporate and individual tax cut, with incremental reform—limited base broadening and international corporate reform—that would reduce revenues by $1.75 trillion over ten years. 


However, with little evidence so far that Congress is moving in the direction of a substantial net tax cut and the continued focus on revenue-neutrality we have seen from congressional leaders, we have reduced our assumption to $1 trillion over ten years, which reflects an expectation of a tax cut that could be considered close to revenue-neutral under the loose definition that congressional Republicans have been using. This could allow for a modest personal tax cut and, with a few budgetary offsets, a reduction in the corporate rate to 28%. We continue to believe that some type of tax legislation is more likely than not to be enacted in early 2018, but this is also now a much closer call than it used to be, in our view.

This is what the shrinking Trump Bump will look like as a result:

A Shrinking Trump Bump

That said, none of this will come as a surprise to the market which no longer expects virtually anything from Trump on the economic front, as confirmed by market expectations which have declined even more, and do not imply much if any assumptions of tax reform, infrastructure spending, or financial regulatory easing. Some more color:

While the probability of meaningful policy changes has declined, in our view, financial markets seem to reflect even lower odds. Exhibit 3 presents four measures that likely reflect policy expectations: the relative performance of baskets of high-tax stocks (upper left panel) and infrastructure stocks (upper right panel) versus the S&P, constructed by our portfolio strategists; the outperformance of an index of bank stocks versus a model constructed by our equity options research team (lower left panel), and 5-year,5-year forward inflation (lower right panel). The first three represent reflect declining expectations of fairly specific policies. The decline in 5-year, 5-year forward breakeven inflation expectations suggests that the market may have now mostly priced out expectations of the broader macroeconomic effects of the Trump agenda as well. In each case, these measures are just above or below their level on Election Day. This suggests that while the probability of a meaningful tax cut by 2018 has diminished, there is limited risk of policy disappointment given such low expectations.

Aside from economic implications, Goldman also echoes what we said after news of the Special Prosector broke, saying that "while recent events have increased uncertainty generally, the appointment of a special counsel might reduce the risks around the expiration of spending authority on September 30 and the debt limit deadline around the same time. We had expected that congressional Democrats might try to use those upcoming deadlines as leverage to force an independent investigation. However, with a seemingly credible independent investigation underway, the issue is less likely to enter into fiscal negotiations at that point, reducing the odds of a shutdown in early October."

Goldman, which incidentally also happens to run the country by way of Gary Cohn and Steven Mnuchin, may be overly optimistic on this however: there are four months to go until the next government shutdown scare, and if recent history is any indication the negative surprises out of Trump assure that the next government shutdown is a question of when not if.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
tmosley's picture

Dear American voters:

The anti-Trump hysteria being pushed by the Dems, RINOs, and the geriatric media is now officially COSTING YOU MONEY.

Vote accordingly.

FreeShitter's picture

Fuck voting, its obviously not working.

spastic_colon's picture

which means it will be a 3 trillion dollar tax cut right?  when you write the code you already know the outcome.

GlassHouse101's picture

Just slash it the whole way . . there is 0% chance the tax cut will make it thru CONgress.

CJgipper's picture

Trump could make it happen.  I don't understand his reticense.  If he'd just  start tweeting about Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell and John McCain directly, stuff would start moving right on through.  


1.  Make proposal.

2.  Hold Paul Ryan publicly accountable for putting it to the floor.

3.  Create list of yes no votes (publicly acessible).

4.  Start tweeting about one no vote each day and what they're holding up.




barysenter's picture

We're going to need more incendiaries.

ebworthen's picture

By design. 

Establishment Washington loves being employed and enriched by the banks/corporations/insurers as they collude to continue screwing the Middle Class.

SubjectivObject's picture

Squid watch:

"Mnuchin tells Elizabeth Warren, with a straight face, that Trump’s campaign pledge to implement Glass Steagall has nada to do with breaking up banks."

roadhazard's picture

Let me repeat, never going to happen.

Consuelo's picture



 None of what has gone on for the past (how many administrations now?), will change until up-jumps-the-devil.   And who might that Devil be?   Could be any number of things, but none of them originate within our borders.    Such is how fate operates, whilst the mark remains mesmerized, dumbfounded & confused.

WTFUD's picture

Trump Tax? Surely, you mean Goldman Tax mon?

Yen Cross's picture

  There isn't going to be a tax cut period!

Anarchyteez's picture

Looks like expatriation is the only way to have a life of ones own.

Sooo flipping sick of it all!

Yog Soggoth's picture

Not true. Just base your business in Puerto Rico for tax purposes. You can still own property on the mainland and spend your time wherever you want. Trump just said he plans to eliminate the death tax and that is all someone with brains should care about.

veeger's picture

the other .75 trillion goes to tell-aviv.......for warships to sink unarmed palestinian fishermen.....

yogibear's picture

US dollar crashing as James BullTard talks about more QE.

decentralisedscrutinizer's picture


It’s becoming obvious that our worst economic and political problems revolve around the global hegemony of corporate cartels headquartered in the US, where their military force resides. The only effective way, now, to regain our sovereignty as citizens of a constitutional republic is to severely curtail the activities of such corporations. To remain a free nation, we have to stop granting corporate charters to every con artist that comes along and start demanding a well-defined social value in return. The "Divine Right Of Kings” should not apply to fictitious entities just because they are “Too Big To Fail”. We can't take the incorporation of private transnational banks for granted anymore. The government must be held responsible to human voters, not fictitious entities.




An omission in the US Constitution created the swamp of corporate corruption we now see surrounding our capital. It is a swamp that can't be drained at this point because the Constitution doesn’t provide a legal drain. This 28th amendment is intended to provide that drain so Congress can legally pull its plug. As a matter of political practicality we must rely on the Article 5 Constitutional Convention for which the electorate will need prior consensus to avoid preemptive state or corporate interference. This is what it will take, in plain language, to save the world; and nobody gets hurt:




28th Amendment


Corporations are not persons in any sense of the word and shall be granted only those rights and privileges that Congress deems necessary for the well-being of the People. Congress shall provide legislation defining the terms and conditions of corporate charters according to their purpose; which shall include, but are not limited to:


1, prohibitions against any corporation;


a, owning another corporation,


b, becoming economically indispensable or monopolistic, or


c, otherwise distorting the general economy;


2, prohibitions against any form of interference in the affairs of;


a, government,


b, education, or


c, news media, and


3, provisions for;


a, the auditing of standardized, current, and transparent account books, and


b, the establishment of a state and municipal-owned banking system


c, civil and criminal penalties to be suffered by corporate executives for violation of the terms of a corporate charter.




The Founders had to fight a bloody Revolutionary War to win our right to incorporate as a nation – the USA. But then, for whatever reason, our Founders granted the greediest businessmen among them unrestricted corporate charters with enough potential capital & power to compete with the individual States, smaller sovereign nations, and eventually to buy out the Federal government itself. Now that these fictitious entities own the USA and command its military infrastructure by virtue of the Federal Reserve Corporation and run it by virtue of regulatory capture, MSM propaganda, and Congressional lobbying, they’ve set their sights on the creation of an all-inclusive global financial empire. The US Constitution is the de facto “Charter” of that Empire. Only we, the people, can amend it, and in doing so, restore the Republic.


JLee2027's picture

Someone's opinion is news? This is not news. It is opinion.

wide angle tree's picture

The imbeciles and jackasses in Congress are ill-prepared to deal with the turd ramming realities facing the counntry.