Globalists Are Building An Army Of Millennials To Destroy Sovereignty

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,

Back in October of 2016 I covered an issue which I have been very concerned with for over a year now. In an article titled Global Elites Are Getting Ready To Blame You For The Coming Financial Crash, I outlined the basis for my belief that Donald Trump would win the U.S. election and why the U.K. Brexit was allowed to meet with success. Here is a quote from that article to give you a general sense of my position:

“I argue that the Trump tapes will be forgotten in a week and that they have no bearing whatsoever on the election. They are nothing more than bread and circus. Beyond the fact that really, almost no one cares what Trump said a decade ago. I argue that this election has already been decided. I argue that the globalists want Trump in office, just as they wanted the passage of the Brexit. I argue that they need conservative movements to feel as though we have won, so that they can pull the rug out from under us in the near future. I argue that we are being set up.

 

Again, the elites are openly telling us what is about to happen. They are telling us that if ‘populists’ (conservatives) gain political power, the system will effectively collapse. To what extent is hard to say, but let’s assume that the situation will be ugly enough to influence the masses to reconsider the ideal of globalism as a possible solution. The elites are fond of the Hegelian dialectic and the philosophy of ‘order out of chaos,’ after all.”

While Trump did indeed go on to “win” the presidency, I still believe that the basic foundation underlying my prediction has mostly fallen on deaf ears. There is a disconnect in terms of the globalist long game in people’s minds. I think it is because many in the public do not consider the effects of geopolitical events on mass psychology. Or, to be more precise, many people, even in the liberty movement, forget that the ultimate goal of the globalists is not just to corrupt governments and monetary systems, but to corrupt our collective mindset.

As a perfect example, I will link to the latest globalist lunacy from the Pope, Jorge Bergoglio, in which he attacks libertarianism (true conservatism) as a dangerous form of individualism that threatens the fabric of the new and more progressive collectivist world.

In terms of Western culture, recent events would indicate that globalists hope to enlist the newest generation to reach “maturity” (and I use that term loosely), the millennials, as a weapon to deal the death blow to conservatism. If not directly, then indirectly through propagation.  That is to say, if the globalists can’t kill us off immediately, they will try to breed us and our ideas out after bringing down the hammer of economic and social crisis.

When I discuss what essentially amounts to a “war on conservatism,” what do I mean? Well, first let’s consider what it is about conservatives that presents a threat to the globalists…

Limited Government

The basic core of conservative thought rests on the concept of limited or small Constitutional government. If you don’t believe in small government, you are not a conservative. Big (and centralized) government is the most vital tool in the hands of globalists. Without it, they would not be able to accomplish a single item on their agenda.

Big government requires big money. Thus, the central banking syndicate becomes “necessary” to the life of the nation or society because they have positioned themselves to provide the financing and fiat that greases the big government wheels. In a limited government system, central banking becomes irrelevant. It is therefore essential that globalist financiers diminish or destroy conservative principles of limited government because they represent a primal threat to the interdependent behemoth system they hope to create.

Sound Money

True conservatives are sound money champions. This principle fell by the wayside for many decades but has made a resurgence since 2008 as more people have been awakened to the failings of central banking and fiat money. Sound money is basically money backed by a tangible commodity, money that cannot be created out of thin air. If it can be created out of thin air, it is not sound money.

Obviously, the very existence of a true sound money movement horrifies the globalists. Without fiat printing or digital currency systems (which can be created and re-created ad infinitum), the future of a global currency system, the pinnacle goal of the globalist economic scheme, is all but impossible.

Free Thought And Free Expression

If you are in the business of controlling the thoughts and opinions of other people, then you are not a conservative. This is where we find distinct misconceptions, by liberals most of all, as far as what free expression is.

For conservatives, this means that if you are in a publicly funded space or on private property with permission of the owners, you should have the right to say whatever you like whenever you like (this includes so-called "hate speech", millennials and liberals). You should be able to make grievances known and to discuss those grievances in a constructive manner. It does not matter if your thoughts are offensive to some people; their feelings are meaningless compared to your freedom to speak in that space.

Leftists seem to think that freedom of expression means being allowed to invade the sanctity of other people’s private property or invade a public gathering with the intention of disrupting the free speech of others that they disagree with. My favorite argument presented by leftists is their argument that liberty proponents cannot kick them out of events or off of websites because “that would be a violation of our own principles and their free speech.” They don’t seem to understand the different between private and public or destructive and constructive. My other favorite argument leftists often use is their argument that it is an act of free speech when they disrupt other people’s free speech.

Hopefully you can see the difference between the two ideals. Leftists today seek to control speech and expression they see as “aberrant” or “evil.” Conservatives defend everyone’s right to speak as long as they respect the nature of the property they are standing on and do not abuse the owners of that property — this includes taxpayers, the owners of public property.

Freedom Of Association

This is a very simple and straightforward liberty that has all but been crushed in our country today. Conservatives have this crazy idea that you should not be forced by government to associate with people you do not want to associate with. It does not matter why you don’t want to associate with them. The “why” has no bearing whatsoever. We feel that logic should dictate the situation. If you don’t want to associate with someone, why would they want to associate with you?

But, for some reason, certain people within our culture and within government believe that denying anyone association is discrimination, and, in a progressive and interdependent society, discrimination is unacceptable. I happen to think the ability to discriminate on an individual level is necessary to a healthy society. Discrimination only becomes dangerous when it is backed by government power.

The Right To Self Defense

Many people are so disconnected from their own survival that the notion of “self defense” is alien and terrifying to them. They pay taxes so that “professionals” can handle their security for them, after all. Why should they need the means to secure themselves and their loved ones?

Well, what if the professionals you pay taxes for suddenly turn on you? Or what if they simply quit en masse one day? What if your attacker is 60 seconds from harming you and the closest law enforcement officer is six minutes away? In a conservative society, EVERYONE acts as security for themselves and others if needed.

Globalists need to encourage a culture in which the population is always reliant on government for everything, including their own safety. The most effective form of control comes not through force, but through permission. The most successful tyranny is the one that the people demand rather than the one people barely tolerate.

Sovereignty

All of these principles coalesce into the root principle of sovereignty — the inborn right to self determination. This might take the form of individual action or voluntary group action based on the freedom of association. A single person might seek to live on his own away from others in his own way, and he absolutely has the right to do this even if it annoys people for whatever crazy reason. A large group of people also have the right to cooperate, to build a system or even a nation based on a particular set of shared values and to have their borders respected or avoided by those with different values.

Conservatism, at least in its traditional form, is the vanguard of sovereignty. Without conservatives, sovereignty dies.

*  *  *

Now that we have briefly summarized the conservative archetype, consider for a moment the predominantly progressive millennial generation; what values do they hold? This is not to say that all millennials think the same way, but what about the majority? In 10 years, what would a country like the U.S. look like when they move into power?

The statistics indicate that the U.S. would be even more socialist than it is today, bordering on communist. A paradise for pushing forward the globalist agenda.

When you take into account the fact that Bernie Sanders, a staunch socialist with Marxist tendencies, garnered more support from young voters during the last election than both Clinton and Trump combined, you can see the problem here. Sanders enjoyed nearly 80 percent of the millenial vote in many states, and this tends to correlate with what we have seen in other western nations such as the U.K., where over 70 percent of the young vote was AGAINST the Brexit campaign to leave the globalist EU project.

Also take into account the establishment push to instill millennial academia with open borders propaganda.  In this article for the Washington Post, the president of George Mason University in Northern Virginia argues that open borders are the source of "innovation" and a better economy.  Open borders philosophy cannot coexist with sovereignty.  Sovereignty being a foundation for individualism and nationalism; open borders being a foundation for forced collectivism and a one world system.  For open border ideology to continue forward, all sovereignty must be eliminated.

Here we find the socialist entrenchment within the younger population. To question its validity among them is simply not done. Through most of Europe, for example, to even describe one’s self as “conservative” is considered highly taboo. Many sovereignty activists there will instead list themselves as “classical liberal” (conservatives).

In the U.S., the last true bastion of hardcore conservatives, there is a little more hope as Generation Z teens are showing signs of a conservative resurgence and a little more sense than their older millennial brothers and sisters. This is why I believe the globalists are focusing on the millennial subset; the millennials experienced the American world when they were children at its height pre-2008 and conjured grand dreams of career, success and technological ease. After the crash and subsequent end of college degree relevancy, they now feel jilted and put upon. Clearly “free markets” are the culprit and revolution is the answer.

Generation Z is growing up in the new and downtrodden economic landscape. They are accepting that harder work is necessary and that more freedom is paramount instead of demanding that entitlements be given to them. So, it would appear that the the globalists have a small window of time to stage a coup against conservative philosophy, install a new millennial generation as the captains of the ship and discourage Generation Z from continuing on the path towards what they consider a "terrible and ignorant" world view.

If you think that perhaps I am exaggerating the gravity of the situation, or that I am applying too much conspiracy to an otherwise random social development, I would like to cite Facebook mogul and globalist cabana boy Mark Zuckerberg, who in a recent speech to Harvard graduates asked them to “fight isolationism and nationalism” which he equated with “authoritarianism” and to support “openness and global community.”

“This is the struggle of our time. This is not a battle of nations, it is a battle of ideas,” Zuckerberg stated.

Zuckerberg’s rant is just the most recent example of this propaganda in action. As I have been warning, the globalist strategy is to destroy opposing ideas, not just opposing groups. And clearly, they want to exploit the millennials to do just that.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
sirsmokum's picture

Can't wait to see the skinny pants brigade.

gimme soma dat's picture

Uniform rompers with man buns?

38BWD22's picture

 

 

This new Pope is a Liberation Theology asshole.  Pity.

Other than young veterans (who might well be conservative/libertairan if not in MS-13...), how may Millennials own guns, and know how to use them?  (Our daughter does, and is the best shot in the family).

 

ACP's picture

In the 60s it was don't trust anyone over 30, now it's don't trust anyone under 35.

Sanity Bear's picture

Now it's don't trust anyone, period.

luky luke's picture

There are no conservatives or liberals.

The globalists are playing with the dumbasses, while they're stealing all their money using central banks. Divide & Conquer.

http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2015/07/28/how-the-ashkenazi-jew...

winged's picture

"millennial generation; what values do they hold?"

Well, they seem to love holding a cell phone.

Common_Law's picture

And even the cell phone gives them cancer. (According to the WHO)

https://youtu.be/FttrOK1ec4Q  the low view count is because it's a re-upload of a paid YouTube documentary.

Luc X. Ifer's picture

Read Dostoevsky Demons for communist anarchism reference and you'll recognize today's left liberalism copy cat at work. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5695.Demons

Bendromeda Strain's picture

That's funny because I was thinking more along the lines of The Screwtape Letters and Rules for Radicals, inspired by your namesake.

Jubal Early's picture

And you can be certain they are 100% backing the coming 5G cellphone control grid hooked into the global brain in Jerusalem.

JRobby's picture

More than doing their jobs

shovelhead's picture

The Pope is the Man of the Year. After he started blowing his hole, all the media forgot about about the NAMBLA club and concentrated on his lunacy de jour.

They picked the right man for the job.

Bendromeda Strain's picture

Petrus Romanus is indeed the man for the job. According to the recorded vision of St. Malachy, the job is overseeing the destruction of the church.

http://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/st-malachy-predicted-pope-bene...

runningman18's picture

In ten years they will be wearing suits and ties and pushing a #2 pencil through your sack and calling for compliance to globalism.  The article is talking about what happens when a particularly indoctrinated generation inherits the world. 

Is-Be's picture

Courage man.

We are the product of millions of generations of ruthless genetic selection. Not one fatal slip in all those years!!

Mr. Darwin will be using this stressor to test the Millenials out. They are well equipped for their trial.

The globalists might Think they have all their dicks in a row but they have far less control over the situation than they would believe.

Thery may have a strategic victory., but in the long run this episode will be an historian's footnote.

NidStyles's picture

Exactly why I am not worried.

 

Nature doesn't give a shit what you plan. She will kick you in the nuts and steal your lunch money before you even set foot into the classroom, if she want's to. When she's done, one of her many minions will chase you up a tree and wait for you to starve, so they can eat your corpse. 

 

Only those worth surviving will do so. The rest will scream and cry about how someone wronged them on their way into the beasts mouth.

 

My honest advice, learn to be the beast. He gets treated better by Mother Nature. He also gets to eat more often. He often earns a longer life expectancy,  especially if he learns to work with his own kind. Be the beast, and don't worry about those that wouldn't listen.

RockySpears's picture

"Only those worth surviving will do so."

 

  Only those ABLE to survive, will do so.   FIFY

 

RS

Sanity Bear's picture

Thomas Hobbes had a memorable description of that kind of world: "nasty, brutish, and short".

Never thought the "philosophy" of savagery would find an credulous audience here. But it often doesn't play out the way you are hoping.

If you're too big, the little ones can and will gang up on you and bring you down. The lifespan expectation of peaceful big guys (i.e. elephants) is indeed long, but the number is not the same for hunter-killers, in fact it is quite low. And what brings many of them down are other hunter-killers.

The reality is that most of the space that Nature provides is occupied by little guys, littler guys, and littlest guys.

Stop playing the Alpha-Beta game and learn to be a Gamma Rat.

Is-Be's picture

Never thought the "philosophy" 

You confuse philosophy, ideals, and empirical observation.

Evolution is an empirical endeavour, free from ideals but should be embraced by philosophy as it is a second order truth. (The first being that Reality is procedurally generated. Objective Materialism is dead)

You imply that you are opposed to Arête, the pursuit of excellence, if I understand your position correctly.

The persuit of excellence is what separates us from other "Civilizations" such as any who throw their trash on the ground.

Bendromeda Strain's picture

Blah blah blah... entropy. The persuit (sic) of excellence gives "us" Hollywood and rap music. The Snowflakes© are a result of cultural evolution, and a manifestation of spiritual entropy. By the way, it took "us" a bit of time to figure out how to actually harness a landfill, and your heart surgeon may come from a village that cherishes cow dung.

Sanity Bear's picture

"excellence"

You keep saying that word...

Perhaps this is a good time to mention that it's a bad idea to start a land war in Asia.

fattail's picture

Elephants also live in large homogenous cooperative communities of likeminded individuals.  Perhaps a reason why they have been so resilient?

ds's picture

Yes. Darwinism is about the 10 to 20% of each generation of the species that really matters. The present Globalists do not set the future Agenda. Their Agenda has never nurtured the 10% of the millenials to hand over their batons. Their exclusiveness built on greed and banksterism, etc will be challenged. No top dog (past and present) has ever considered anything to be predestined. If not they are not the 10%. 

The 90% in the non-millenial generations should take an honest look at their record. What are they handing down 1) 99% of wealth owned by 1% 2) greatest amount of debts kicked down, etc. Poltically, their liberalism and/or conservatism can only be enforced through militia force, trade sanctions, etc. Also, they have not been the stewards of what had been good (worth preserving) for their respective cultures, races, religions and nations. 

You really beiieve that the 10% of the millenials will consider these as their legacies. Do not project the future from warped self deception through the always insiginificant 90% millenials. Many in this group carry the same viruses (handed down) of clultures, religions, races and nations. They do not foist the future of the species. 

It is also non-linear that the 10% millenials may just be transitional species and you have to wait for another generation. Bestiality is what it takes to rid weak genes so never dream that the 10% millenials care for the previous generations, perhaps rightly so. If they ever foster an environment with some inclusiveness, that inclusiveness is more likey to be for the 90% millenials who inherited the mess.

Good for the 10% millenials that they are not noticed or taken seriously. Through their mastery of the new exploding technologies (their tools) and when they rule, you better not be around if you have not make your peace pacts. The only certainty that you have is that the nature of the Beast never dies just mutate. Keep going on this intergenerational war that can only claim more bodies or incinerators for the despised generation of the millenials. 

yogibear's picture

The ex-hippie professors at the universities did a fine  job of  molding these degenerates into Marxist.

CheapBastard's picture

Re: "professors" .... this is the type of low life universities are hiring to fulfill quotas:

 

Recordings show Texas A&M prof endorsing anti-white violence in class including killing white people


Dr. Tommy Curry became a focus of controversy last week when recordings surfaced of a 2012 podcast interview in which he discussed “killing white people in context” and asserted that, “In order to be equal, in order to be liberated, some white people may have to die.”

 

According to emails obtained by an open records request, Curry delivered multiple lectures on “justification for violence against whites” during 2006 and 2007.

 

https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=9201

 

The radical hater still has not been fired from Texas A&M. Can you imagine if a white professor advocated killing black people?

Jubal Early's picture

The recent evergreen useful idiot eruption was centered around a professor (((weinberg))).    An very disproportionate number of the instigators of the counter culture were tribe members:  Ginsberg, Hoffmann, Graham and on and on.

ebworthen's picture

"We are the World, we are the children...!"  Pretty sure that insanity started there.

I'll let 1913 establishment of FED slide, for now.

Bryan's picture

The term "useful idiots" comes to mind here.

sixsigma cygnusatratus's picture

Sadly, that's exactly correct.  Globalists will promise them everything and lead them to peril, like a pied piper. 

HRH Feant2's picture

I remember being told the story of the pied piper. It was one of the creepiest little kid stories, ever. WTF? Some freak runs around town playing a flute and all the kids follow him an end up being drowned? What a sick fucking story to tell to kids! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pied_Piper_of_Hamelin

I don't remember many childhood stories but that is one that sticks in my mind.

shovelhead's picture

It's a cautionary tale about breaking promises.

38BWD22's picture

 

 

And lots of the old fairy tales were deeper than we currently give them creit for.

"Ring Around the Rosy [...]" was about the plague.

East Indian's picture

Baa baa blacksheep was about a tax on wool

Humpty Dumpty was political satire

Someone showed how "the dish ran with the spoon" was about Elizabethen gossip.

Gulliver's travels, Wizard of Oz, Animal Farm...

Bendromeda Strain's picture

Rudyard Kipling was a good one for cautionary tales.

RockySpears's picture

Try the "Childrens Crusade", now that is some sick stuff to do to children.  One can only imagine the horrors these kids succumbed to,

 

RS

logicalman's picture

In every generation the majority are asleep, a few are awake and a small number are parasytic psychopaths.

The millenials will be no different.

 

swmnguy's picture

Most of this talk about Millenials is just as much bullshit as it was about Generation X, Generation Y, the Baby Boomers, etc.  It's wild over-generalization.  As you say, all age cohorts of people are similar, except where they would be different because the times are different.

We're hearing that these young adults are lazy and crazy for not rushing out to buy houses and start a family?  It's pretty darn rational, if you look at the housing market and what they're carrying in student loan debt now that a college degree is required to work at 7-11, pretty much.

The crazy stuff you hear happening on college campuses isn't new or unusual either.  Nor is it really all that common.  Gee, they're nuts at UC Berkeley and Evergreen State?  No shit?  Now, it's true, manners have changed and we've got fashionable new terminology for people which some people take too seriously.  But there were things we said when I was a kid that were just mean and unnecessary and I'm not sorry they're no longer acceptable in polite company.

The Millennials are just fine.  Or at least, they're no more screwed up than any other age group.. 

38BWD22's picture

 

 

That's my best (unscientific) reading on them as well.

They sure do like their smartphones and apps though.

 

techpriest's picture

Depends. Kinda weird for me as I am an early Millenial, and most of the generalizations do not apply to me, or my sister for that matter.

My view is, GenX and Boomers were constantly distracted by FOOT-BAWL! while my generation is distracted by the more recent iterations of Facebook.

The question always is, who is in a position to influence the next generation of action-takers, and who is that generation right now. Everyone else is simply going to follow whoever sounds nice.

GoldRulesPaperDrools's picture

You realize of course that FOOT-BAWL! season only lasts for about six months total, but FaceBook and cell phones are 24/7?  Oh, and if you've been watching current events a lot of people are turning off the FOOT-BAWL! because there are too many ungrateful morons kneeling for the national anthem, so a lot of us refuse to help pay their salaries.  Some of us refuse to use FaceBook and Twitter and the other narcissistic, mind-masturbatory social media sites as well.

GooseShtepping Moron's picture

To describe the problems of the Millennial Generation is not necessarily to place all the blame on them. Their parents and the culture at large have a lot to do with it, too. But it doesn't help matters to say that the Millennials are just fine. That patently isn't the case.

runningman18's picture

Bullshit.  No generation in the past several decades has acted the way these snowflakes act.  There is a concerted collectivist religion being instilled in them.  It's not just youthful rebellion going on.  They are the children of globalism. 

RTP's picture

There is no bloodline toward God's chosen people. There is only a conspiracy to buy all the children into a globalist agenda.

RumbleGuts's picture

You are totally right swmnguy  +1000  

The children.now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.  Socrates 375 BC

Brandon Smith should read this and remember that his generation was also supposed to fuck up the world.

 



RockySpears's picture

"We're hearing that these young adults are lazy and crazy for not rushing out to buy houses and start a family?  It's pretty darn rational, if you look at the housing market and what they're carrying in student loan debt now that a college degree is required to work at 7-11, pretty much."

 

  They would do those things if they could afford to.  They are not, not doing it for a reason, or any great understanding.  They are not doing it, becaiuse they can't,

 

RS

Lanka's picture

White Millenials apparently will not be reproducing much.

serotonindumptruck's picture

There was apparently a peer-reviewed study released a number of years back which showed that roughly 10% of any human social group will demonstrate sociopathic/psychopathic tendencies when allowed to thrive within the optimal environment.

If that study is even partially true, then many of us encounter psychopaths on a routine or regular basis, yet remain unaware of their presence at the time.

The world is evidently full of psychopaths and sociopaths, however most of us seem to lack the detection skills necessary to identify them.

I've always believed that the desire to actively seek out public office or positions of authority were one of the character traits that could be used to identify those personalities.

HRH Feant2's picture

I have used a measure of what I fondly name the sliding-scale of insanity for a number of years.

The scale goes from 0 to 10. 0 means you are a baby, innocent, pure, and unable to be deceptive. 10 is the worst kind of deceit, that which is practiced by psychopaths.

I think we all fall somewhere on this scale. Those that are really mentally ill or mentally deficient do not concern me. They are harmeless, most of the time. Those that mix mental illness with intelligence scare the crap out of me. Most people are between a 3 and a 6. It is those that climb up the scale that make me nervous. The ones that will steal your money. The ones that will lie to put you in jail. The ones that will lie and put you in jail and kill you.

You are correct, the ability to detect psycopaths is difficult. I am always aware of such people, lurking in the background.