57% Of Americans Think Government "Works Better" When Women Get Involved

Tyler Durden's picture

How are women viewed in different countries across the world? Views fluctuate massively depending on where you live with Russians particularly negative about women's responsibilities in the government or companies...

Infographic: How The World Sees The Role Of Women  | Statista

You will find more statistics at Statista

The data used in the infographic was compiled by Ipsos MORI.

Only 34 percent of people in Russia say things would work better if women held positions with responsibilities in government or companies while 69 percent say the role of a woman in society is to be a good mother and wide.

In India, views are far more mixed where a woman's role is in society is seen as a part of government and business as well as a good mother and wife.

In the United States, 57 percent of people think things would improve with more women in government and companies while 41 percent say the role of women is to be good mothers and wives.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
LetThemEatRand's picture

Where is Saudi Arabia on that list?  You know, the country that was the biggest donor to the woman who ran for President in the US?

silverer's picture

Their support was an act of war they got away with. lol

erkme73's picture

How many things actually do "work better" when women get involved?

UselessEater's picture

You are correct, the Federal Reserve Act 1913 is case in point.

813kml's picture

The FED was doing God's work until Yellen took over.

DontGive's picture

Total Winners eh? See the likes of Maxine Waters, Pelosi, Boxer. Let's not even discuss the Clinton Clan Cunts.

These 'people' also wear Pussy hats, follow bunk science like a religion (cows farting us all to death), think the world is flat, and that islands can tip over.

robertsgt40's picture

Involved? You mean like Monica Lewinsky? 

BeanusCountus's picture

Hmmm. Probably 57% of likely voters are women. That's no surprise. I bet 80% od "unlikely voters" (men) would disagree.

Handful of Dust's picture

Women may do a better job ... but not in the West, evidently.

We see the dismal failures of Crooked Hillary, Melissa Mayer, Debbie Wasserman, Merkel, Teresa May, etc And there's the total [hypocrite] losers like  Ellen degenerate, Streep, etc.

I won't even touch the 'entitled' ones like the wookie, Jarrett, Dona Brazile, Maxine Waters, etc

However, I have seen women in places like China and read about women in Russia who do a knock-out job both in the corporate world and in government. Even their female actresses have more common sense then American counterparts.

kochevnik's picture

Western women taught femininity is a weakness.  Our women know it is strength

IntTheLight's picture

The role of women is to be good mothers and wives. Healthy families all have one thing in common. Stay at home wives. Now that women work, children are obese, tattooed and pierced. It is so depressing.

Of course I'm of the mindset that women shouldn't vote either. That's been an utter disaster.

OverTheHedge's picture

The real mistake was giving them shoes

(h/t to Heinlein)

Tall Tom's picture

 

 

 

"Our women know that it is [THEIR] strength." FIFY

 

 

Feminine traits in women are THEIR strength. I agree as that is the essence of a woman.

 

On the other hand feminine traits in a man is weakness and revolting.

Yen Cross's picture

 HT-  Greenspamm and Bernanke?

xavi1951's picture

According to the 'Crazy Hot Matrix', personal experience, and Dr. Phil's show, they are ALL loonie.  Evidenced by the fact that most are liberals and as we all know, Liberalism IS a mental disease.  So why would anyone want to put more crazy people into the government?

Cooked poll!

Lisa Montez's picture

Not all of us are liberals. But the state certainly has an easier time brainwashing women, that's for sure.

Manthong's picture

 

Geezus… everything fell apart starting with women suffrage.

Does anybody out there realize that women’s “rights” and the Fed take-over in the US occurred at about the same time?

Heh heh… this should raise some ire…

F with me and I will beat you over the head with one of Hillary’s petrified cankles.

UselessEater's picture

Are you sure about the dates? American women did not get the national vote until 1920...how does that make the biggest travesty in American history anything to with people other than the jews? Eustace Mullins comes to mind not womens liberation movements funded by Rockefeller (RIP Arron Russo, he explained it real well).

Is it of interest to you what jew cabals have been doing via central banking, cultural marxism and the extermination of white Christian nations by horrendous means? Or are you just fascinated with petty female dramas in your life? Or comment fluff on ZH?

 

Manthong's picture

 

You forgot Margaret Sanger in your sage wisdom...

Now there’s a fluffy cankle upside the head for you.

 

 

UselessEater's picture

Yeah I am not fluent with woymyn lib, plus not an American. However as a female Rhodesian who lived in Australia a few decades... I found traitors in both sexes.

The primary issue to me is who accepts the bankers and who does not fight the invaders, maybe I am from tougher stock but we fought and still some are fighting.

Watch the traitors and the infiltrators, they are the ones you cannot name without jail time, some are male and some are female...tick tock

 

http://historyreviewed.com/index.php/2017/06/10/video-extremely-angry-bo...

http://historyreviewed.com/index.php/2017/05/30/video-dr-peter-hammond-t...

Manthong's picture

 

In my bottom dresser drawer … a T-Shirt

“Be a Man Among Men… Rhodesian Army”

 

If I just lose a few more pounds of upper body muscle, I could squeeze that on again.

 

It would be a hit on the range.

 

but.. the galling thing is that Cecil Rhodes is at the root of the problem.

 

..mavbe not so fluffy.

 

UselessEater's picture

It's a bugger that Rhodes is in my birth nation name... tough shit. We did not go gently into the night, its almost and FY name! They did not get to slaughter all of us whites, which was their goal. Further, we will NEVER forgive Mugabe being given a free hand to slaughter 30K+ blacks after we agreed to and complied with every single shitty condition to hand over power to international communism under a new constitution despite them suicide-ing John Giles the imminent constitutional lawyer of Rhodesia in peace talks at Lancaster house in 1979.

Those 30k+ black deaths were slow and dreadful, they are not on our head.

RIP John Giles.

Manthong's picture

A trip to N Congo, Uganda, Nigeria will show you the same stuff.

..and South Africa was doing well with the Dutch until the English bankers  F’d it up.

Zim is a classic case of imposing banking interests over the welfare of the local economy.

Who won there? …….   The City of London, Incorporated.and the successors of Cecil Rhodes.

HowdyDoody's picture

You will be unsurprised to find that the Boer War was a banker war.

Manthong's picture

.. all wars are banker wars.

kill all the bankers and have peace.

tmosley's picture

57%? So 100% of women, and 14% of men?

Or are women more self-aware, and the men are just beta-cucks, so the result looks more like the opposite?

Seriously, women don't belong in places of power. They aren't built for that, any more than a man is built to nurse a baby.

Manthong's picture

..just to establish some commonality…..

 When I think of pig roast, the name Lloyd  first comes to mind.

 ..and when it comes to Greek snacks.. Jamie is up there.

 

DarkestbeforeDawn's picture

After a woman is done giving birth and nurturing the last child to say, age 16, their utility is greatly decreased.  Their continuing role is to lead around around spineless, weak men by the nose.

Manthong's picture

But they smell..

Like Hillary,, Fiendsteene, Lynch, X-Streem Bad Waters etc.......

Sweet Cheeks's picture

Dear Useless,

I have been pissed about the gray and deadly men of Zurich, the CFR, and Trilateral Commission since my youth. Furthermore, cultural Marxism and the war on whites and men are equally important.

But Manthong was just making an observation that things seems to be going to hell.

UselessEater's picture

When things go to hell, get yourself right. Stop watching stupid movies that subtly indoctrinate you, re=learn you ancestors and read what they wrote.

Skip the idea that anything Oprah says is good. We worked hard and we put up with a lot of tough times to create our lives, we did not look at a grass hut, smile and think that was "good". We have shared our good, it has been used and abused by a tribe. Live life pissed off, determined and smile at the sunset - you were a man and did a good days labour in your own fashion.

Whites are resourceful, and enjoy seeing the results of their labour. Today (((they))) infiltrate media -the right media is available, just do not believe the crap they feed that life should be easy or based on feelings. Crap. It is hard work, planning and figuring and delayed satisfaction - we are brilliant at that!!!! We get real happiness from that, not idle bar talk or watching stupid sport tv....we really excel and enjoy producing and creating.

All the white men I grew up with excelled at defending their home and nation - nothing delights us in our father/brother/husband being upright and ready for war.

But by the grace of God, our Rhodesian men did and we did not lose they way the CFR/Round Table/bolshevik freaks wanted.

Always remember, we are naturally creative and gifted at defence.....no need to get lost in the grand plan to demoralize whites.

http://historyreviewed.com/index.php/2017/06/10/video-extremely-angry-bo...

 

 

Dizzy Malscience's picture

Do I detect some hint of racism there?

No.. you are just validating R/K selection and the influence colonization had on the >1 standard deviation IQ aboriginals in Africa.

If you really study the colonization of Africa, you will find that English banking, not whiteness is the source of the problems there.

Ii is continued today by predatory Anglo-American financial predation.

 

 

NAV's picture

Exactly.

Women are natural communists; America’s republic was founded primarily by men; it is now being destroyed, primarily by women. Welcome to the bankers' NWO.

Feminism Was Created by US Communist Party | Henry MaKow, Ph.D.

"Rape is an expression of ... male supremacy ... the age-old economic, political and cultural exploitation of women by men."

Does this sound like a modern radical feminist? Guess again. It is from a American Communist Party pamphlet from 1948 entitled "Woman Against Myth" by Mary Inman.

In a 2002 book, Red Feminism: American Communism and the Making of Women's Liberation, feminist historian Kate Weigand states: "ideas, activists and traditions that emanated from the Communist movement of the forties and fifties continued to shape the direction of the new women's movement of the 1960s and later."(154)

In fact, Weigand, a lecturer at Smith College, shows that modern feminism is a direct outgrowth of American Communism. There is nothing that feminists said or did in the 1960's-1980's that wasn't prefigured in the CPUSA of the 1940's and 1950's. Many second-wave feminist leaders were "red diaper babies," the children of Communist Jews.

Communists pioneered the political and cultural analysis of woman's oppression. They originated "women's studies," and advocated public daycare, birth control, abortion and even children's rights. They forged key feminist concepts such as "the personal is the political" and techniques such as "consciousness raising."

https://www.henrymakow.com/000180.htmlhttps://www.henrymakow.com/000180.html

However: “Feminism was repressed in the USSR. The Soviets understood its subversive character.”

JLee2027's picture

Century of Satan. Now ending.

 

Does anybody out there realize that women’s “rights” and the Fed take-over in the US occurred at about the same time?

Lisa Montez's picture

It was the sexual revolution that did it. Thanks to Gloria Steinem, for the first time, many women had to work outside the home, taking their children to daycare, because their husbands no longer made enough money to support a family. And this was supposed to be good for us!? We were supposed to celebrate this!? What a joke.

Twee Surgeon's picture

Sex and those Cuisinart things that your not allowed to touch anyway ? High Heels and Fishnet stockings. Credit Cards. That's 4 things.

Manthong's picture

 

It's an evil plot, I tell you.

chiaroscuro's picture

 

Men who date and/or marry vapid, materialistic women are at least as much to blame for their own unhappiness as the women they are with.

 

Sweet Cheeks's picture

Weed eating works much better at my house when I get involved. But I can't get involved until hubster starts the thing for me.

Endgame Napoleon's picture

Well, women entered the workforce en mass in the early seventies, and real wages and the middle class have been on a downward trajectory ever since. Wages have stagnated and declined with a doubling of people competing for jobs. Many of the working women receive unearned income from spouses, ex spouses or government that enables them to accept low pay. Wealth from salaried, high-paying jobs is concentrated at the top like never before due to two high earner couples, taking two jobs and putting them under one roof, which has diminished the middle class significantly. Marriage rates have plummeted. Out-of-wedlock births to women who often enjoy taxpayer-subsidized rent and groceries, topped off by a Child Tax Credit of up to $6,269, have risen to 62% of all births. Despite the extras made possible for single moms by Uncle Sam, like welfare-financed tattoos and trips, fewer women (or men) will retire into paid-for homes, unlike most of the married, stay-at-home wives/mothers of previous eras who did. At the top, though, weddings continue unabated, resembling royal events, with palaces to match when the young, two high-earner couples begin to breed. Women in politics, in the MSM and in other positions of authority have played a Yuge role in fostering this corrupt-a** status quo. It is a lot like the aristocratic power-marriage alliances of the corrupt Old Europe, along with throwing bones to "the poor," specifically endless welfare/taxfare bones to their fellow moms at the bottom of the economic scale, with everyone else thrown to the dogs. Remember all the rhetoric about deadbeat dads--deadbeats who made just as little as the moms, but who did not get everything from taxpayer-subsidized rent to a $6,269 tax-cash reward each April for their part in the copulation/reproduction. Women in leadership are even worse when it comes to s******g single, childless women. Moms in power stick together like glue. What a joke that people think most women in power do anything other than calling for more privileges for working moms.

JLee2027's picture

Restoring the traditional family with male patriarchy leadership sends the women back home and solves many problems.  It is inevitable with the widespread rejection of feminism that is occurring.

MEFOBILLS's picture

When women get a divorce, they almost immediately cling to government and become liberal.  Once liberal they vote for their own interests, and even against men.  They vote themselves access to the police and guns and courts, to then take away from the actual creators.  

Men, especially white men, are the great inventors and creators, and builders.  Women, for the most part, are unable to do this, and don't belong in the man's world.

A woman's main value is what is between her legs, and her ability to make children.  There is no challenging biology, despite all of the transgender BS.

Biology is reality, not some sort of forced Communist Bolshevik ideas of women suffrage.  The communists actually want to break down families, and the point of weakness is women.  Break down families and break down civil society.

This is why Jewish Frankfurt Schools pushes its false narrative, especially the narrative of Feminism.

Women can't have it all.  They are clearly unhappy today in a mans world.  They are runnign around shrieking and screaming about "keep your hands off of our bodies" when in reality nobody wants to touch these fatty feminists.  They would be much happier in a single income family, raising children.

Thanks Jews for finance capitalism, such that usury sucks all the wealth upward in a pyramid, to the top 1%.  You are the mensch.

JLee2027's picture

You ruined a perfectly good post with some strange sentences about JEWS. This has nothing to do with the JEWS.

DarkestbeforeDawn's picture

It has everything to do with Joos.  Just look up Gloria Steinem and that gang and find out where their funding came from.

Manthong's picture

So what if the Ashkenazi took over a good chunk of Germany and northern France in the middle ages…

So what if the Queen of England is really a Saxe-Gothenburg German ? (true.. look it up)

Is it just me or does anyone else recognize the last four letters in “Ashkenazi” ????

They will all be mooslim soon (as the bankers desire).

The mayor of greater London will preside.

You did not learn that in school.. did you  ???

Don’t get me started on the lies about the war between the states (hint…it was not a CIVIL war).

chiaroscuro's picture

 

Would you tell a nun that her highest calling was between her legs? If you feel your greatest talent lies in your groin that’s your own affair. But you have no business dictating to other people what their calling is.

Both sexes took the bait that divided us. Men bought into the idea that manliness meant getting laid with as many women as possible and delaying commitment as long as possible. Women fell into the trap of believing that they were stronger for viewing men as objects that played a relatively minor role in their lives. The problem with both approaches is that they disrespect the opposite sex, the family unit and God. This lack of respect furthers the breakdown of the family and society and fuels more materialistic pursuits to compensate for the loss of community in our lives.

There was a time when we had more trust and respect between the sexes. Men and women formed families that for the most part took care of each other. Now we have so much “independence” that instead of depending on and taking care of our own we have government, industry and bankers we can count on for all our needs. But at least greater numbers of men are escaping the ball and chain of marriage. And greater numbers of women aren't burdened with career crushing children. Now that’s freedom!

 

 

 

. . . _ _ _ . . .'s picture

"How many things actually do "work better" when women get involved?"


Lots of things.

Let's see, there's mud wrestling, jell-o wrestling, oil wrestling, beach volleyball, ...

Infnordz's picture

Nothing involving politics or any kind of leadership or techical role in non-govermental, charity or business organisations works better with Women; most women tend to make these worse!  e.g. HR appears to be a useless make work area for incompent women to help meet PC sex employment quotas

Only a small percentage of women are actually competent at these kinds of work, but there a plenty of health and psychological reasons why even they would be better off being young married mothers first!

Women should not have any political vote/role because of their more emotional 'reasoning' thus childish/selfish boundary pushing, rather than males rationality.  Their stupid votes/campaigning(nagging) have caused unfair bad law and regulations to be created which irronically now hurt women because aware men became more wary of women, they can become spoilt for relationships/marriage (via hypergamy), and may loss the chance to have enough/any children, and Red Pill men will reject iffy/spoilt women.

It is quite sad that so many so-called developed countries, especially Northern Europe (originally a K-type stronghold) has gone so damned r-type (Rabbit) retarded with 'strong' women, it is quite irronic that disparaged Russia and some other Eastern European countries are now relatively a lot more K-type, so their women are more feminine, thus more desirable; when their infrastruction is good enough, there could be a significant male drain to those countries!

I suspect that some of the shockingly high Red Bar score results in Northern Europe (UK 60% pissed me off) are caused by r-type immigration, but I am surprised that Germany's Red bar wasn't a lot higher!

The score for Japan is interesting, I suspect because they have restricted immigration and still have some loyalty to their strong K-type culture.

OverTheHedge's picture

I could rant on about equality and how women have won the sex war, but it has all been said before.

Women want equality? Then treat them equally. If you would punch a man for being uncouth and insulting, why not punch the equally uncouth and insulting woman? I suggested this to a fairly uncouth woman a while ago - she was less than impressed with my reasoning, but at least she was bright enough to shut up. My issue with all of this is that women are not equal - they now have the upper hand in almost everything, precisely because they are NOT treated equally..

The only real issues I have ever had when working, was when there were women in management - suddenly the job stops being about getting the job done, and starts being about lobbying for position, intrigue, office politics etc. Huge reduction in efficiency, and a huge increase in management. Endless meetings about the necessity of having meetings etc.