JPMorgan Pulls Ads From NBC News After Megyn Kelly's "Repulsive" Alex Jones Interview

Tyler Durden's picture

While Megyn Kelly's interview with Russian President (and all around global bad guy if one were to believe the daily barrage of leftist headlines)  Vladimir Putin did not raise the ire of advertisers, it appears her interview with right-wing provocateur Alex Jones has lurched from social media firestorm to real-world dollars and cents for NBC News.

The sit-down has been promoted as a discussion about “controversies and conspiracies.”

In a video promoting the interview, Jones talks about the 9/11 attacks as an “inside job.” In the clip, Kelly also brings up Sandy Hook, saying: “When you say parents faked their children’s deaths, people get very angry.” Jones replies: “But they don’t get angry about half-a-million dead Iraqis from the sanctions.”

And now, as The Wall Street Journal reports, J.P. Morgan has asked for its local TV ads and digital ads to be removed from Kelly’s show and from all NBC news programming until after the show airs, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The company doesn’t want any of its ads to appear adjacent to any promotions for the interview, the person added.

This comes hours after Kristin Lemkau, J.P. Morgan’s chief marketing officer, questioned why Ms. Kelly would conduct the interview.

As an advertiser, I’m repulsed that @megynkelly would give a second of airtime to someone who says Sandy Hook and Aurora are hoaxes."

On his radio program Monday,  Jones said that he thinks Sandy Hook happened, or at least that children died, though there are anomalies about the event. However, he said that was edited from the NBC promotion. “I’m tired of being misrepresented,” Jones said and added that he demanded Kelly’s “hit piece” not air on Father’s Day.

WSJ reports that other NBC advertisers have stayed mum on the planned episode, at least publicly.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Marge N Call's picture

"So you saw the bodies? Or, you personally witnessed the children get shot?

Did you ever ask any of these "PEOPLE'S" (presumably you mean, CHILDREN'S) "parents" why they moved to Newtown less than four years before the "shootings"? "

Dude, ask the parents of someone who has lost a child why they moved to Newtown? Are you out of your fucking mind? Do you REALLY believe it didn't happen??

Child-actors? My, you are quite the brainwashed little fellow aren;t you?

Seriously, when did ZH become a ghetto InfoWars?

 

Keyser's picture

Let's cut to the chase, you show me your anecdotal evidence and I'll show you mine... I already went first, so it's your turn... Name some of the people that YOU KNEW who died in this incident...  Come on, we are waiting with baited breath... Probably much like the crew of the shuttle Challenger, the dead mysteriously reappeared at a later date under new names... I mourned Dick Scobee for years, until I found out the fucker was still alive!!!

Marge N Call's picture

So driving past a school and seeing the lot full of cars, and seeing buses and school children coming and going is "anecdotal" proof that the school wasn't closed?

I saw it. I didn't "know" someone who saw it.

I personally talked to children who were there but survived.

Wait, no, those must have been child-actors just like your chuckleheaded tinfoil hat buddies think. LOL.

Let's see which scenario passes the straght face test, shall we?

A. there's a bunch of actors out there who "acted" (and continue to "act", wait are they still getting paid?) as survivors, children and adults, yet NOT ONE has ever come forth and told their secret?

or 

B. there's a bunch of poeple who actaully survived.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA, how FUCKING DUMB are you guys?????

mayhem_korner's picture

Keyser.  Here's a little credibility riddle for you:

Pose question to which only someone who lived in Newtown, CT in December 2012 would know the answer.

 

max_leering's picture

Marg, People I know didn't die. I can tell you that with 100% certainty. So NO, people (children) didn't die.

The school was closed. That is the TRUTH.

Blanks!... what blanks?

And my better judgement tells me that "GUN CONTROL" was the only result the perps of Sandy Hoax wanted me to believe. Or believe in.

BTW, people died on 912 too, but it was just a real car wreck. I'm totally drawing a blank to fill in.

False_Profit's picture

I've always been intrigued that there were no injured survivors...all that were shot were killed...that kid was like "special operator" good...

RAT005's picture

Precisely.  My .223 24" barrel puts FMJ 55gr through a 1/4" of steel at 180yds.   There should have been a lot of through and through injuries.

mayhem_korner's picture

There were injured survivors.  You just choose to ignore them in your narrative.

mayhem_korner's picture

The school was not closed.  Where do you make this stuff up? 

kiwidor's picture

name them, cunt!  got any pictures of the bodies?  no.  i figured you wouldn't.  fuck off!!

you won't tho. you'll never offer evidence of anything

mayhem_korner's picture

Little riddle for you and the rest here.  Figure it out or shut the hell up about what you "know."

Pose a question to which only someone who lived in Newtown, CT in December 2012 would know the answer.

(Take your time) 

Marge N Call's picture

"pictures of the bodies"??? Are you autistic?

Velocitor's picture

Oh, "Marge N Call" on the internet knows people that died. She even said so. 

Who can refute such ironclad proof?

SoDamnMad's picture

Kristin Lemkau needs to watch a few YouTubes especially those produced by Silvia Smallstorm about Sandy Hook.  Explain also David Wheeler, former B-movie gun villan showing up dressed as FBI sniper, then grievign father and finally riding on Air Force One with Obama to a gun control blitz in Washington.  And Wayne Carver putting the information suppression through CT legislation prior to SH.  Here is the first YouTube people should watch.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1yfJDCMU64&t=55s

putaipan's picture

his name was gunther.

 

er, sumething like that.

agNau's picture

Bingo!

Never read that one before.

+100

* Maybe it was just a matter, not an investigation.

DoctorFix's picture

Yep... the whole story, as well as Aurora, is so full of holes you could drive a truck through them

meditate_vigorously's picture

Gatekeeper. Collect all the ones who made it passed the other barriers of propaganda and hold them there. Most of the "alt-media" fits this model.

Pretty much any source that censors criticisms of Jews is a gatekeeper and funded by oligarchs directly or indirectly. There are exceptions, of course.

NidStyles's picture

Bullshit, the Alt-Right is openly critical of Jews.

It's the primary topic in the Alt-Right, the opposition of Jews being in leadership positions everywhere. Because that's what Jews do, put each other in power to steal and protect each other.

Is-Be's picture

Bullshit, the Alt-Right is openly critical of Jews.

That is correct in the main but like every movement the alt-right is not monolithic.

If I were pressed to find the center of the alt-right I think that I would say that it is a mixture of cynicism and skepticism of the values and ideals that are promulgated by raw power.

I am not sure that my definition is either complete nor accurate, and would welcome correction.

Many years ago we were told in the military that the mission depended upon having many layers of agreed upon lies. 

I believe that I have peeled away many of the layers of lies about 911.

First layer.

#1 Bin Laden did it with box cutters.

#2 Jeb Bush did it by pretending to service the lift wells thereby allowing 

#3 the Jews to plant a photo of themselves with lots of cardboard boxes marked "Thermite", and allowing themselves to be seen dancing and giving an interview in Israel about how they did it. Really? Laying it on a bit thick, I think!

Were "they" forewarned? Yes. Only one Jew died. The rest chose to take a Sickie on 911.

But did they do it? No. They were doing what Jews do best- controlling the narrative.

So what happened?

911 was a preannounced demonstration  of military might by an unknown (to us) actor. A military demonstration of a technology so advanced that the might of the MIC was unable to protect us from it.

The MIC was impotent and could only control the narrative. They could not evacuate the area without acknowledging the existence of this actor and their impotence.

Mere speculation?

No.

Watch Judy Wood's "Where did the Towers Go" on YouTube.

Absolutely no seismic signal of the collapse.

It was the best that the MIC could do.

Keyser's picture

Who do you think owns Breitbart these days? I've got a hint for you, it isn't the christian right... No, the true owners of a good bit of the alt-right, including Alex Jones and Breitbart, is a religious cult whose name rhymes with zoo... 

kiwidor's picture

but the identity of said actor is still unknown to this day.  how can this be?

if you engineered the project yourself, you could do it with 30 to 35 of the right men.  then you have a cleanup crew to kill them, and then another crew to kill the terminators.  however, there's one really big problem here.  all the folks required to control the narrtive afterwards.  

now bring Predictable Human Incompetence into the picture.  the success starts unravelling the more folks are involved, unless they're identically loyal to an ideal, and identically supercompetent.  now where are these supercompetent people?  i wish i could find them, i'm tired of working with turkeys

 

 

Velocitor's picture

How did you arrive at the number 30 to 35?

You can reduce the number who have to be silenced if participation in the event is used as an initiation into a higher circle. Save damning evidence of their participation somewhere, and they're "made men"- they'll remain loyal because you have the carrot of their newfound privileged status, and the stick that can send them to the electric chair.

 

 

Clashfan's picture

"Bullshit, the Alt-Right is openly critical of Jews."

not infowars or Breitbart, at all--opposite/Zionist, really

aren't they 2 w/the biggest audiences. too?

flaunt's picture

Sure, he's been going it alone since the 90s because he's being paid by the CIA.  There's an element who would like you to believe anyone who talks about the truth must be a covert agent of the deep state. If you have evidence, provide it. Otherwise, you're just speculating and assuming the worst because you're used to being screwed over. Understandable, but unacceptable.

NidStyles's picture

There is plenty of evidence of his connections to banking interests. Just take a look at his ex-wife.

Crush the cube's picture

He cuts his check from Time Warner, just like the rest of his goon squad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7t4WQwVqVjs

wildbad's picture

i love alex jones. 99% truth

Future Jim's picture

I listened to Alex Jones for about 3 years, and I am convinced he is controlled opposition who does more harm than good.

dogismycopilot's picture

Alex Jones is bad-ass motherfucker. His supplements rock and Paul Watson is a fucking English Bulldog.

For a guy whose Jewish ex-wife has weaponized his kids against him, Jones goes all out. Most guys would have folded when the kids were held hostage.

http://www.salon.com/2017/04/28/alex-jones-loses-custody-dispute-with-his-ex-wife-but-gets-to-keep-his-art-performance/

 

HenryKissingerBilderberg's picture

DO NOT give traffic to salon

salon.com is the private pet project of CEO Elizabeth Hambrecht sponsored by her father William Hambrecht
and they are very PRO pedophile (talmudic jewry sport)
so do not link nor direct traffic to them. they have NEVER made a profit EVER (total losers)

http://fmshooter.com/salon-com-never-made-money-20-years-existence-still...
http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.de/2016/08/the-jews-behind-saloncom...

LeadPipeDreams's picture

Yup - Jones appears to be misdirecting in this interview because nobody died at Sandy Hook.

subversion's picture

While many of these issue do need open discussion letting Jones air his bullshit is a mistake.

He always associates himself with something important and destroys it with childish antics (classic cointelpro).

He serves his masters well.

Is-Be's picture

Cockroaches hate the light.

Never One Roach's picture

"No free speech for you!"

 

~ Jamee

Dickweed Wang's picture

You can have free speech but you'll need a license for it . . .

ebworthen's picture

J.P. Morgan "Bailout Bankster Baby" Chase upset - about what, reality?

Establishment media, fingers in ears:  "La-la-la-la!"

Wait, do cockroaches have ears?

Turn on the lights!  "Raid!?!"

Is-Be's picture

My comment was unworthy of so many up votes. Not that it was untrue but because it took no effort.

Stuck on Zero's picture

JP Morgan. Weren't these guys fined billions for conspiracy in the Madoff case, money laundering, collusion in mortgages, fraud in transactions, and ... well, every crime that gangsters commit.

wildbad's picture

right on. if they don't like it, it must be good.

even kelley's 12 hour editing couldn't wash the truth out of it

logicalman's picture

The truth stands on its own merit, only lies need protection.

Bay of Pigs's picture

She's a gatekeeper and a complete fucking moron.

Dickweed Wang's picture

Make you wonder L-man what kind of person would downvote our comments on this topic . . . pretty sad.  In the end they will get what they deserve.

HopefulCynical's picture

I do not wonder in the slightest.

Dickweed Wang's picture

What purpose do they have in oppressing opposing viewpoints if they are being truthful?

 

You know who your real oppressors are by the topics that you are not allowed to speak about . . .

TeethVillage88s's picture

OT Survey Immigrants
<- 1) If you treat women like Chattel u don't belong in West
<- 2) If you poo in the street u don't belong in West

putaipan's picture

kinda like the 2016 choice.

i vote no confidence.

Give Me Some Truth's picture

Kind of like my argument on auditing the Fed (and the nation's alleged gold supply).

If there is nothing to hide, why not welcome an audit? Audits that revealed nothing eye-opening would simply prove that all the "nutcases" really were nutcases.

Seems like these people would want to prove this. 

TeethVillage88s's picture

Military Type Audit could be 'fixed' or could be very impartial and effective... so... could be crap shoot without personalities carefully chosen to monitor or provide oversight to the AUDIT.