A Replacement Of Population Is Taking Place In Europe

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Giulio Meotti via The Gatestone Institute,

  • People-smugglers bring the migrants to the NGOs' ships, which then reach Italian seaports. Another legal enquiry has been opened about the mafia's economic interests in managing the migrants after their arrival.
  • One cannot compare the migrants to the Jews fleeing Nazism. Pope Francis, for example, recently compared the migrants' centers to Nazi "concentration camps". Where are the gas chambers, medical "experiments," crematoria, slave labor, forced marches and firing squads? These comparisons are spread by the media for a precise reason: shutting down the debate.
  • By 2065, it is expected that 14.4 million migrants will arrive. Added to the more than five million immigrants currently in Italy, 37% of the population is expected to be foreigners: more than one out of every three inhabitants.

First, it was the Hungarian route. Then it was the Balkan route. Now Italy is the epicenter of this demographic earthquake, and it has become Europe's soft underbelly as hundreds of thousands of migrants arrive.

With nearly 10,000 arrivals in one recent three-day period, the number of migrants in 2017 exceeded 60,000 -- 48% more than the same period last year, when they were 40,000. Over Easter weekend a record 8,000 migrants were rescued in the Mediterranean and brought to Italy. And that is just the tip of the iceberg: during the summer, the number of arrivals from Libya will only increase.

A wooden boat carrying migrants waits to be escorted to the Topaz Responder vessel, as members of the Migrant Offshore Aid Station make a rescue at sea on November 21, 2016 in Pozzollo, Italy. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

A replacement of population is under way in Italy. But if you open the mainstream newspapers, you barely find these figures. No television station has dedicated any time to what is happening. No criticism is allowed. The invasion is considered a done deal.

In 2016, 176,554 migrants landed in Italy -- an eight-fold increase since 2014. In 2015, there were 103,792. In 2014, there were 66,066. In 2013, there were just 22,118. In the last four years, 427,000 migrants reached Italy. In only the first five months of this year, 2017, Italy received 10% of the total number of migrants of the last four years.

There are days when the Italian navy and coast guard rescue 1,700 migrants in 24 hours. The country is exhausted. There are Italian villages where one-tenth of the population is already made up of new migrants. We are talking about small towns of 220 residents and 40 migrants.

One of the major aspects of this demographic revolution is that it is taking place in a country which is dramatically aging. According with a new report from the Italian Office of Statistics, Italy's population will fall to 53.7 million in half a century -- a loss of seven million people. Italy, which has one of the world's lowest fertility rates, will lose between 600,000 to 800,000 citizens every year. Immigrants will number more than 14 million, about one-fourth of the total population. But in the most pessimistic scenario, the Italian population could drop to 46 million, a loss of 14 million people.

In 2050, a third of Italy's population will be made up of foreigners, according to a UN report, "Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Decline and Aging Populations", which designs a cultural melting-pot that could explode in cultural and social tensions. The level of arrivals will fall from 300,000 to 270,000 individuals per year by 2065; during the same period, it is expected that 14.4 million people will arrive. Added to the more than five million immigrants currently in Italy, 37% of the population is expected to be foreigners: more than one out of every three inhabitants.

In addition, the humanitarian-aid system has been hit by new scandals. "The investigative hypothesis to be verified is that subjects linked to ISIS act as logistical support to migration flows", was a warning just delivered in front of the Schengen Committee, to the Italian anti-mafia and counterterrorism prosecutor, Franco Roberti. There are now judges investigating the connection between the migrants' smugglers in North Africa and the Italian NGOs rescuing them in the Mediterranean. People-smugglers bring the migrants to the NGOs' ships, which then reach Italian seaports. Another legal enquiry has been opened about the mafia's economic interests in managing the migrants after their arrival.

Only 2.65 percent of those migrants who arrived in Italy were granted asylum as genuine refugees, according to the United Nations. The other people are apparently not fleeing wars and genocide. Yet, despite all this evidence, one cannot compare the migrants to the Jews fleeing Nazism. Pope Francis, for example, recently compared the migrants' centers to Nazi "concentration camps". One wonders where are the gas chambers, medical "experiments," crematoria, slave labor, forced marches and firing squads. Italian newspapers are now running articles about the "Mediterranean Holocaust", comparing the migrants dead by trying to reach the southern of Italy to the Jews gassed in Auschwitz. Another journalist, Gad Lerner, to support the migrants, described their condition with the same word coined by the Nazis against the Jews: untermensch, inferior human beings. These comparisons are spread by the media for a precise reason: shutting down the debate.

To understand how shameful these comparisons are, we have to take a look at the cost of every migrant to Italy's treasury. Immigrants, once registered, receive a monthly income of 900 euros per month (30 euros per day for personal expenses). Another 900 euros go to the Italians who house them. And 600 euros are needed to cover insurance costs. Overall, every immigrant costs to Italy 2,400 euros a month. A policeman earns half of that sum. And a naval volunteer who saves the migrants receives a stipend of 900 euros a month. Were the Nazis so kind with their Jewish untermenschen?

The cost of migrants on Italy's public finances is already immense and it will destroy the possibility of any economic growth. "The overall impact on the Italian budget for migrant spending is currently quantified at 2.6 billion [euros] for 2015, expected to be 3.3 billion for 2016 and 4.2 for 2017, in a constant scenario", explains the Ministry of the Economy. If one wants to put this in proportion, these numbers give a clearer idea of how much Italy is spending in this crisis: in 2017, the government is spending 1.9 billion euros for pensions, but 4.2 billion euros for migrants, and 4.5 billion euros for the national housing plan against 4.2 billion euros for migrants.

The Italian cultural establishment is now totally focused on supporting this mass migration. The Italian film nominated at the Academy Awards last year is Fire at Sea, in which the main character is a doctor treating the migrants upon their arrival. Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi carried with him 27 DVDs of the film to a session of the European Council. Italy's commercial television channels produced many television programs about the migrants, such as "Lampedusa", from the name of the Italian island. 100,000 Italians even took the streets of Milan for a "rally of solidarity" with the migrants. What "solidarity" can there be if half a million people have been rescued by the Italian government and the whole country seems determined to open its doors to all of North Africa?

Winston Churchill was convinced that the Mediterranean was the "soft underbelly" of Hitler's Europe. It has now become the soft underbelly of Europe's transformation into Eurabia.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
b-sugar's picture

The end game is brownish unrooted masses VS blood-mother affiliated jews. 
The pure VS the goy.
Masters VS slaves.
Light VS darkness. 

Putrid_Scum's picture

Your analysis is incorrect, because it fails to comprehend the patient planning of The Families and the pure evil factions that constitute the Dominant Class.

These foreign bodies are being imported to increase absolute growth, since growth via productivity gains are no longer possible.

They also divide the population. And that's the key. Why?

Because The Reset is now imminent and inevitable, and the Dominant Class want the peasants to kill each other, not them. 

Protect Yourself,



fleur de lis's picture

Once again the Gatestone Institute avoids Barbara Spectre.

The authors pretend to be concerned about Europe but they write as though they have no idea how all this happened.

So what really motivates them?


Putrid_Scum's picture

Many German capitalists have asked me what the Jewish families are up to?

"Are they trying to destroy Germany?" they ask.

The simplest answer is usually the best one. The System----Capitalism---requires growth. And will do anything to get growth. The elites are scared to death...I can tell you friend...If the corporates go under the result is extinction.

And to avoid that we need Framework changes...but how to achieve those required changes? 

The only way is Fascism.



debtor of last resort's picture

Yep, by 2025 sandniggers will be on the menu like dogs in Venezuela.

Putrid_Scum's picture

No...you should read The Reset. It'll be 2018 (at the latest). 

Paul Kersey's picture

There is no "Reset".  With the exce[tion of the decade and a half that followed WW II, the western world has always been heading for neo-serfdom.  


"Just eight individuals, all men, own as much wealth as the poorest half of the world's population:

As decision makers and many of the super-rich gather for this week's World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, the charity's report suggests the wealth gap is wider than ever, with new data for China and India indicating that the poorest half of the world owns less than previously estimated."

False_Profit's picture

Don't forett to mention the rothschilds...their money is infinite since they are in charge of printing it...






The tree of liberty is parched....





Gott mit uns...

equity_momo's picture

Link please. I am always open to new ideas but my base-case is what Paul Kersey says below your comment - Neo Feudalism.  Everythings in place. Its always been in place. And we have always been in that state.  The 20th century just seems like a giant outlier (for a minority of the World that we mostly happened to be born into)

Mareka's picture

While egg heads are theorizing about finding a new planet to live on to escape global warming, the Muslim nations are taking a more pragmatic approach by simply taking Europe.

Governments that plan based on 2 to 4 year election cycles and 2 week news cycles will not win against a culture that thinks in terms of hundreds or thousands of years.

ByTheCross's picture

On a long enough timeline... it is not a matter of dominance, evil, or productivity, but survival/proliferation/diaspora of Homo Sapiens.

With a smaller perspective, though not as small as yours, it may even appear as if eugenics is involved.

Buck Johnson's picture

That makes sense, they need the populations at each other in order for them to do their dirt and hide behind the chaos. 


Jubal Early's picture

Churchill was a "blood-mother affiliated jew", he is probably more to blame for this than anyone outside of a fullblooded zionist.

In WWI he was the one that wasted thousands of the best British, Aussi and Kiwi soldiers in Galipoli when the battles in Flanders were at their peak.  Why?  For his owners the Zionists.

In WWII he refused to listen to any peace proposals from Hitler, he firebombed Dresden and Hamburg, he was the murderer of Germany.

Yet Gatestone still grovels at his feet.  When Obama removed Churchills bust from the white house he was right.

7thGenMO's picture

Churchill was my favorite politician, until I visited Dresden and saw the result of the pointless firebombing - one of the most beautiful Protestant churches in Europe was still being rebuilt at the time. 

I've read one of his histories, and he was certainly a British royal - from the House of Marlborough, but his mother was an American New Yawker.  As a semi-elite of The Empire, he certainly used the British commoners as cannon fodder, but the Empire's priority was the elites (Rothschilds married many British royals).  The interest of the British commoner was a secondary interest. 

The Empire still exists, except that poor American kids are the new cannon fodder. However, I would leave Churchill's bust in the WH as a historical reminder to our British origins, but also as a warning about The Empire and those who it really serves.


Memedada's picture

An article from Gatestone = pure bought and paid for corporate propaganda = waste of mental energy.

Oldrepublic's picture

The elites have this planned out very well

It is called Hegelian Dialectics.

It all fits together perfectly, more migrants, more terrorism, calls for more



Refuse-Resist's picture

Nothing short of full removal of kebab, bulldozing of all mosques, and complete and total ban on all muslim immigration will save Europe.

If it doesn't happen in the next 5 years, I don't believe it will be possible and then Europe will be lost.

Canada is rushing headlong into the same demographic chasm and the USA can't run fast enough to catch up, evidently.

Every ethnic group in western countries is playing identity politics but one. And that non-playing group is simply not allowed to do so and even mentioning it in casual conversation to other members of said group causes gasps of horror, withdrawal, and shunning.

That ethnic group has been programmed to hate itself, to hate its culture, it heritage, its religion, and to value the acquisition of (((money)) over all other things.


Before kebab and bean can be removed however, the leaders and (((lobbyists))) and (((NGOS))) that have opened the gates must be arrested.

Once the inflow has stopped, then the outflow can begin.

It can be done if the will is there.

I don't think Europe is going to wake up in time, although I wish they would.

We have more time here in the USA, but not much more.

Demographics matter.

Glyndwr will return's picture

Refugees will split the EU. Maybe this year . Maybe that's the plan

BeepBeepRichie's picture

A sadist elite plus a masochistic populace equals the annihilation of a culture and society. Moral of the story, grow some fucking balls and lay off the tofu Europe!!!

BeepBeepRichie's picture

Also, fuck the refugees. Learn to swim 

Memedada's picture

It doesn’t take “balls” to realize when you’re being played. The “scare of today” (Muslims/terror/Islam/”extremism”) only scares the well-indoctrinated (balls or not) – the rest of us knows it’s an old trick. Making the plebs fight each other and keep them from identifying the “real terrorists”/extremists/criminals (i.e. the ownership class/the banksters/the deep state).

Troy Ounce's picture


Georgy is having Arturo Fuence cigars and a Moet Chandon on this.

Nightjar's picture

It will be reversed.

Gnostech's picture

Shut it down, the goyim know!

Yen Cross's picture

  There's some smoking hot ladies of color that do [adult movies]

  I'm a hawkinberry.

Yen Cross's picture

 No Tattoos, so you're safe.

  I'm twice your age child.

    Impress me with a certificate of graduation.

      Give us a trade? Perhaps the garment industry?

TheObsoleteMan's picture

This is what happens when you promote contraception and birth control to the native population decade after decade, yet still want to preserve your socialist utopia. Eventually the math doesn't work, and something like this is done to offset the decline in birth rates. They are committing suicide. The replacement population doesn't practice birth control, in fact they multiply like rabbits. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out how this all pans out. By the way; they aren't going to want to pay for a bunch of old white secularist either. I think I know what happens when they reach parity, and it isn't pretty.

Glyndwr will return's picture

Agree with your prognosis . It's exactly how Europe breaks up. Into enclaves / ghettoes / apartheid . Fences and walls everywhere.

pitz's picture

Nothing wrong with low fertility.  It means that there are more resources distributed amongst fewer people.  Europeans and Americans use contraception because they don't want their countries to look like or have the standard of living of a high population density country, for instance, India.  Yet governments keep trying to unwind these efforts. 

serotonindumptruck's picture

In all fairness, overpopulation concerns might not be the primary reason for birth control in the US.

Many first-world citizens enjoy a higher standard of living, and realize that the economic burdens of raising children will negatively affect this lifestyle.

Responsible people realize that the choice to have children is an expensive undertaking.

7thGenMO's picture

"governments keep trying to unwind these efforts" because they do not work for the sheeple.  Governments do the bidding of oligarchs that fund campaign contributions for politicians.  Western governments are simply administrators keeping the sheeple in line for those that benefit most from the petrodollar system - includes the GBP and Euro.

Western oligarchs, in collusion with the House of Saud(omy), are sacrificing Western children on the altar of the petrodollar system for the sake of increasing their wealth and control.

bloofer's picture

It's true that there are advantages to a low population density, such as more resources per capita and more open land and access to nature. But any nation that wants to retain its territorial base will need to balance this against the need to maintain a population sufficient to defend against invaders. You actually need a pretty good supply of young men for that; enough that you can afford to lose most of them in battle, with enough left over to repopulate the country after the war is over.

Lucky Leprachaun's picture

This invastion has NOTHING to do with low European birth rates and providing for ageing Europeans' care. These illiterate parasitic retards flooding in will be a net drain forever.

The invasion is ALL about destroying White ethnic homogeneity.

buzzsaw99's picture

they can have it.  the world isn't fit for decent folk anymore.

Drimble Wedge's picture

Frankly ~ That's how I always kind of interpreted "the meek shall inherit the earth"


If they want to turn it into a s***hole, they can have it as far as I'm concerned.

JohnGaltUk's picture

Socialism will end in Europe when the government bonds fail. When that happens everyone goes tribal, when the economy is turns down hard. The Polish in the UK will have wished thry left when they saw the sign; BREXIT! They will be chased down in the streets and a few other groups. Those with jobs now and a house whom are moderate now, wont be when push comes to shove.

Here in the UK you can feel the atmosphere in the air, like you get that bad vibe in a club\pub just before violence breaks out.

Putrid_Scum's picture

Yes, the masses know something really bad is imminent. 

My beloved sister married an English guy, and yesterday she converted her children's piggy bank of coins into an ounce of Gold.

Her instincts are good,


root superuser's picture

If your sister had good instincts she woulnt have married outside her race and pump out half caste children. At this point it would be much better to prepare exit strategy than stacking. Ethnic nationalism is extremely powerful force. It has been suppressed in western countries for many decades and once its unleashed its going to be bloodbath. The authors of this mess want depopulation and this is how they're going to get it. In not too distant future the minorities in western countries are going to be exterminated.

Putrid_Scum's picture

Wha race is my sister you retard?

Memedada's picture

Hehe, your nick is sufficient: another useful idiot/corporate tool.

But for entertainment value: name me a “socialist policy” implemented by EU? Or better, point me towards just one paragraph in any of all the treaties that form the EU that you consider “socialist”?  

root superuser's picture

This comment would have made perfect sense if you started it with "Multiculturalism" instead of "Socialism".

Blanco Diablo's picture

Islamists have built a powerful infrastructure of terror inside Europe's cities. These terror bases are self-segregated, multicultural enclaves in which extremist Muslims promote Islamic fundamentalism and implement Islamic law, Sharia -- with the Tower Hamlets Taliban of East London; in the French banlieues [suburbs], and in The Hague's "sharia triangle", known as "the mini-caliphate," in the Netherlands. These extremist Muslims can comfortably get their weapons from the Balkans, where, thanks to Europe's open borders, they can travel with ease. They can also get their money from abroad, thanks to countries such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia. These Islamists can self-finance through the mosques they run, as well as get "human resources," donated by unvetted mass migration coming through the Mediterranean.

23,000 potential jihadists in the UK, 18,000 in Belgium, 10,000 in Germany, 15,000 in France. What do these numbers tell us? There might be a war in Europe "within a few years", as the chief of the Swedish army, General Anders Brännström, told the men under his command that they must expect.

BritBob's picture

Open borders - everybody welcome.  That's Mrs. M.s EU and a big reason for Brexit - Fair to say that the majority of the people in Britain were happy to join an economic union with free trade, but not a political union. Who wants to be ruled by Brussels? And who wants uncontrolled immigration?

There is a trade imbalance in favour of the European Union so it is in the interest of the EU to make amicable arrangements with the United Kingdom. What's more, the UK can do its own trade deals on a one-to-one basis instead of having the EU to deal 27 member states before it makes a trade deal.

Hard or soft Brexit the road ahead might be a little bumpy especially when one country (or part of a country in Belgium re the Canada EU deal) can stall negotiations for so long. Spain could act in a similar fashion over Gibraltar and has the cheek to maintain its Gibraltar sovereignty claim. Claim?

Gibraltar - Some Relevant International Law: https://www.academia.edu/10575180/Gibraltar_-_Some_Relevant_Internationa...

So it could be a quick hasta luego !




pitz's picture

Why can't non-reproducing Europeans enjoy the fruits of their non-reproduction, their deliberately induced decreased fertility?

Why do the globalists and government types always want population growth, to the point that they're willing to give up national sovereignty in order to achieve such?


VK's picture

A weakened population will be taken over. Look at nature for the answer. No way Italy can keep access to oil and gas without sufficient GDP growth to pay for pensions and to keep gov types in power.

desertboy's picture

Yes - if you do not breed beyond your means like rabbits, then you clearly deserve to be over-run by those who do, just like nature intended. 

Pliskin's picture

Didn't need to click on the link to know that this was a 'Gatestone' article.

Yep, an all out Muzzie invasion, they're taking over the media, governments, banking....oh wait!

FUCK OFF Gatestone, filthy subhuman mongrels.