A Bearish Citi Warns "Bigger Forces Are At Play", Pointing To Its 'Chart Of The Week'

Tyler Durden's picture

Over the next three weeks, the investing world will shift its attention away from the endless chatter of central bankers and concerns about the state of the economy, and instead focus on second quarter earning season, which launched on Friday with results from the three biggest US banks which showed that chronically low volatility is anything but good for trading revenues (as Jamie Dimon made all too clear in a bizarre Friday rant). As previewed last week, and is the norm, we get most of the US numbers first, followed by Europe and then Japan.

And yet, despite expectations for a Q2 S&P500 EPS increase of roughly 7% Y/Y, suggesting solid economic growth, Citi warns that "we may be approaching a cyclical peak." The biggest concern is that recent economic data, especially the "hard" variety, has been anything but good.

In Citi's chart of the week, the bank shows the fall in the US Hard Data
Surprise Index which on Friday tumbled to a fresh two-year low. The fall to such low levels occurred
due to the near one standard deviation miss in June retail sales. In
contrast, US soft data surprises are staging somewhat of a recovery at
the moment having bounced off recent lows of -56 to -6. This increase
was largely due to positive surprises from both ISM surveys.

In addition to the broader Citi Economic Surprise Index, which is now at mid-2015 levels, the Atlanta Fed Nowcast is also beginning to turn over once again (RHS top).

For now, as Citi's Jeremy Hale notes, forward expectations of earnings for current year and next year in the US are holding up reasonably well compared to previous years (Figure 4, top LHS), however the real question is what happens in Q3/Q4, because as BofA's Michael Hartnett said earlier this week "the most dangerous moment for markets will be when rising rates combine in three or four months’ time with an inflection point in corporate profits. In anticipation of this, we would use the next couple of months to buy volatility, and within fixed income slowly reduce exposure to IG, HY, and EM bonds."

Another concern has emerged. As Citi adds, looking at the driver of these earnings expectations, the commodity rally over the past 12 months has caused analysts to revise higher expectations of forward earnings to relevant sectors, so one would expect oil & gas and basic materials to have large increases in EPS projections. However, given that crude oil continues to make lower highs and lower lows since the start of the year, with increasing non-OPEC production and concerns about the ability of OPEC cuts to sustainably increase the oil price, it’s possible that we begin to see downgrades in these expectations if oil continues to trend lower.

But even if one assumes that somehow future earnings are not dinged as a result of recent oil price weakness, Citi points to something else entirely: the collapse in correlations between earnings and price return since the financial crisis...

... and warns that there are "bigger forces at play" when it comes to future asset prices. Or rather one force: central banks, and specifically "the advent of QE and the ‘easy money’ that has dominated asset markets in this cycle."

The gradual reduction of these purchases and movement to less easy policy from developed market Central Banks potentially leaves asset markets in somewhat of quandary. Our credit colleague Matt King presents a chart which particularly resonates with us, showing asset purchases on a 12 month rolling window vs. risk asset momentum (Figure 5, bottom RHS).

The fit, as Hale admits, "is rather incredible, and ultimately what these charts clearly illustrate is just how important unconventional monetary policies have been for markets in recent years. As such we agree that the removal of CB liquidity, especially if occurring at the same time across the main Central Banks, cannot be ignored."

For risk assets, we are cognizant of recent market experience. In 2015, UST real 10y yields jumped 80bp running into the first Fed hike in December. With a significant lag, equities ended up correcting about 14-15%. In contrast, when real yields rose a similar 80bp in the second half of last year, equities barely noticed (Figure 6 LHS).

 

One difference is in the data which was weakening sharply in the first episode even before real yields rose (a Fed policy error?). But in the 2016 event, data was strengthening, the global recovery broadening and EPS recovering.

Which brings us back to the chart of the week, and the steep decline in the "hard" data : while until now conventional wisdom has generally assumed that the US economy is broadly rebounding, with conventional wisdom assuming a replay of the 2016 event, Citi cautions that "the fall in the Citi US data change index currently is interesting." One can insert a different word here.

Where does the above leave Citi?

Taking all of this into account, we harbor growing concerns for equity markets and entered into a cross-asset trade, where we positioned for equity market downside, funded via selling volatility in oil markets.

To which Janet Yellen had a response: she pulled at 180 and turned dovish this week, sending global stocks to all time highs, followed by even worse economic data in the US, which in turns sent the S&P to a new all time high as animal spirits got reignited...

... or perhaps it was just more people like Citi, shorting the market then being forced to immediately cover once their narrow stop losses were triggered. As JPM's Prime Broker Service showed last week, the amount of short covering just hit a YTD high.

Although, if that is indeed the catalyst for the latest burst of the "Icarus Rally" higher, it probably won't last. As of this week, the short interest in the SP& is back to level seen just before the last financial crisis...

... which means that what few bears remained in this market have now been flushed.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Rick Cerone's picture

The black economy of the breakaway civilization needs to return the $40 trillion stolen from US taxpayers. You have 90 days, or else.

yogibear's picture

Hey Citi bank Chart crooners, your going to look like real dumbass dufuses as the market climbs higher. You have been spewing this BS for a while. I suggest you throw. Away your useless charts in this central bank rigged game.

Rick Cerone's picture

Citi is jerking you off while screaming insults in your face. Smile! Just smile.

old naughty's picture

oh yea, says who?

The (truly) bigger force?

FreeShitter's picture

Bigger forces = CTRL-P, an entity which must never  stop.

Son of Loki's picture

Jamie must be colluding with the Russians to have made such a bold statement in the face of such "solid economic growth."

DavidFL's picture

Perhaps you guys did not hear Yellen's speach this week! Better tune in, so you dont write these out of step diatribes. We are headed for the blow off top!

max2205's picture

Dark pools are really going to roll over the market 

gregga777's picture

Don't worry everybody!  The Goldman Sachs Feral Reserve System's "wealth effect" policy is continuing its roaring success as the Universal Basic Income to the rich and even richer, the banking gangsters and the CON Street Swindlers.  Just to remind everyone, the motto of the Goldman Sachs Feral Reserve System is:

 

"We steal from those least able to afford it and give to those who least deserve it."

 

 

Obsidian Samctum's picture

There are bigger forces than banks? Intradasting.

Batman11's picture

The economy of the West is suffering from Japan’s problem after 1989.

China and many emerging markets will also be suffering from the same problem soon.

The build up of debt within the economy gives prosperity today at the expense of the future.

There is a fundamental misunderstanding on how money and debt work.

“…banks make their profits by taking in deposits and lending the funds out at a higher rate of interest” Paul Krugman, 2015.

A 21st century Nobel prize winner whose “financial intermediation” theory leads him to believe debt isn’t a problem

Monetary theory has been regressing since 1856 as progress isn’t always in the forwards direction.

“A lost century in economics: Three theories of banking and the conclusive evidence” Richard A. Werner

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521915001477

When using the correct “credit creation” theory of money the foolishness of the neo-liberal era becomes apparent.

It seemed to work due to money borrowed from the future.

We released the power of finance, which was the power of debt and sooner or later you start making the repayments as Japan has been doing since 1989.

The US:

https://cdn.opendemocracy.net/neweconomics/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-21-at-13.52.41.png

The UK:

https://cdn.opendemocracy.net/neweconomics/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-21-at-13.53.09.png

Debt soaked zombie economies that are going nowhere fast, like most of Europe and soon to be joined by China and the emerging markets.

It will be a little late when we discover the problem with today’s economics that doesn’t look at private debt in the economy.

Batman11's picture

We really should have woken up in 2008 rather than attributing it to a “black swan”.

It’s as clear as day on the graph above, but no one was looking in the right place.

Well, Steve Keen was, he saw it coming in 2005.

He expects China to blow up soon, along with Hong Kong, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Australia, Canada and South Korea.

They are debt soaked time bombs.

 

The main stream media tell us how Government debt will have to be paid back by future generations.

Private debt is just the same, it takes money out of the future and, unlike public debt; you can’t defer the repayments indefinitely.

They are half way there but just looking in the wrong place as usual.