Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data"

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Mac Slavo via,

As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:

In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.


As a result, this research sought to validate the current estimates of GAST using the best available relevant data. This included the best documented and understood data sets from the U.S. and elsewhere as well as global data from satellites that provide far more extensive global coverage and are not contaminated by bad siting and urbanization impacts. Satellite data integrity also benefits from having cross checks with Balloon data.


The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming.


Finally, since GAST data set validity is a necessary condition for EPA’s GHG/CO2 Endangerment Finding, it too is invalidated by these research findings. (Full Abstract Report)

Of course, this won’t stop global climate normalcy deniers from saying it’s all one big conspiracy to destroy the earth. They’ll naturally argue that data adjustments to the temperatures need to be made for a variety of reasons, which is something the report doesn’t dispute. What it does show, however, is that these “adjustments” always prove to be to the upside. Always warmer, never cooler:

While the notion that some “adjustments” to historical data might need to be made is not challenged, logically it would be expected that such historical temperature data adjustments would sometimes raise these temperatures, and sometimes lower them. This situation would mean that the impact of such adjustments on the temperature trend line slope is uncertain. However, each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history.

In short: The evidence has been falsified.

Karl Denninger sums it up succinctly:

It is therefore quite-clear that the data has been intentionally tampered with.


Since this has formed the basis for plans to steal literal trillions of dollars and has already resulted in the forced extraction of hundreds of billions in aggregate for motorists and industry this quite-clearly constitutes the largest economic fraud ever perpetrated in the world.


I call for the indictment and prosecution of every person and organization involved, asset-stripping all of them to their literal underwear.

The real data looks something like this:



And the establishment, along with their fanatical global warming myrmidons, continue to push the need for massive, costly initiatives to reduce green house gases and global temperatures to “normal” levels.

The problem, of course, is that there is no global warming according to the above referenced report.

Moreover, none of those supporting the Paris Climate Agreement and other initiatives have any idea what these behemoth regulations will actually do to curb climate change, as evidenced by the following video of Miami Beach Mayor Philip Levine, who despite his best efforts, can’t seem to figure out exactly how these agreements actually lower temperatures and help Americans:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Boxed Merlot's picture

...gigantic con-trick led by meteorologists and climate scientists ...

Doesn't sound much different than the way people used to try to measure months, (lunar cycle), and years, (solar cycle), 15-16 centuries ago. Most western civil authorities waited for the Jewish hierarchy to give their official "new moon" sanction to denote new months and their catch-up 13th month to co-ordinate annual solar cycles every 4th "year" or so.

Once technological understanding became mainstream, they were dust-binned and needed to find new relevancy.

It's kind of funny that if one were living in 325 ad/cme, one would never have known it as years being assigned a numerical value didn't start until the 6th century.

smacker's picture

Whilst there are believers/suckers of this global warming hoax on both sides of the political spectrum, it is those on the Left who argue that it is mankind's fault. This allows them to advocate/demand ((moar)) government, ((moar)) social control, ((less)) freedoms and ((moar) taxation to spend on their pet projects.

The sad thing is that they ignore the need to find ways to clean up our environment and reduce ground-level airborne pollution, especially in the big cities.

VWAndy's picture

 Its not fraud if the government is in favor of it. Catch 22. It only becomes a fraud if the state says so.

JailBanksters's picture

Global Warming during a period of Solar Minimum equals Total Bullshit

Climate Change during a period of Solar Minimum obvious.

Global Cooling during a period of Solar Minimum equals Mini Iceage.


Shue's picture

It's very obvious what these cunts have planned, milk the world as much as possible and then play the fucking gay hero's who saved the world by bringing the temperature back to normal, using the real data prove it.  Filthy scum need to be stripped of all their assetts indeed.

Ed Jobb's picture

One day i'm gunna die of not-surprise.

gregga777's picture

Anthropogenic Global Warming is a massive fraud. 


When wondering about anything going on the world one should always ask, "Cui Bono?", that is, who benefits? After asking that question one should follow the money. 


Americans spend $400 BILLION every year for electricity. Prior to the AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) fraud, coal-fired power plants generated 60% of American electricity and natural gas 10%. As of today, coal provides only 31% and natural gas 34%. Natural gas is primarily owned by the major integrated oil & gas corporations.


Water vapor comprises 10,000 parts per million to 40,000 ppm of the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide makes up less than 400 ppm. A greenhouse works by preventing convection cooling with the outside atmosphere. How then could CO2 possibly be a "greenhouse gas" especially in such a low concentration versus water vapor? 


The work of Dr. David Evans in Australia is important. He has produced a model based on the principals of the black box network used in electrical engineering. His work shows that there is a notch-delay function in the Earth's climate. His work also shows that CO2 probably has little to no effect on the Earth's climate.


The Vostok ice cores shows that Earth’s temperature begins increasing many centuries before CO2 concentration increases. When Earth’s temperature begins falling it takes many centuries before CO2 begins falling. This data shows that CO2 has little to no effect on climate. 


The AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) fraud is a very lucrative business for the major integrated oil & gas corporations and the banks involved in carbon credit trading. The AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) fraud is similar to the Ozone Hole fraud that was blamed on chlorofluorocarbons but really caused by Antarctica’s volcanic Mount Erberus.




Overflow-admin's picture


-- rotting corpes of Hawking, 2017

Grandad Grumps's picture

Contrary to AI's belief, Humanity IS NOT waiting for a savior. Humanity just needs a level playing field... with access to the truth.

css1971's picture


These guys would all have been hounded for popping their heads up under Obama. Lucky to get away with losing their jobs.


This is what you get when something becomes publicly funded. It also becomes political. Climate change is just a tool to implement a political agenda.

Gotta eliminate public funding for schools and universities.


Mimir's picture

Total hoax circulated by the infamous CATO institute

Let's look at the authors and supporting “scientist”.


Dr. Alan Carlin
Retired Senior Analyst and manager, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,

Dr. Harold H. Doiron
Retired VP-Engineering Analysis and Test Division, InDyne, Inc. 

Dr. Theodore R. Eck
Ph.D., Economics, Michigan State University
Former Chief Economist of Amoco Corp. and Exxon Venezuela

Dr. Richard A. Keen
Instructor Emeritus of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado 

Dr. Anthony R. Lupo
IPCC Expert Reviewer
Professor, Atmospheric Science, University of Missouri 

Dr. Thomas P. Sheahen Ph.D., Physics, M.I.T. 

Dr. George T. Wolff
Former Chair EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee 

Nice try but it is laughable. The report is totally bunk.


SmallerGovNow2's picture


6CO2 + 6H2O + SUNLIGHT ---> C6H12O6 + 6O2

CO2 is plant food!!!


Photosynthesis, biology 101, the only science you need to know.

AchtungAffen's picture

Starch is people food. Why am I not seeing you taking it by spoonfulls?

CRM114's picture

If you had any credibility, you'd attack the argument, not the authors

Congratulations, you rate a 2 out of 7

Sir John Bagot Glubb's picture

Let's see the list of the climate scientists you think are credible.  

We'll find that they are all world government fanatics and they have everything to gain from perpetuating anthropomorphic climate change hysteria.  Probably that fraud James Hansen of NASA is at the top of your list.  No surprise there.  And let's not forget the "scientists" at East Anglia University in England who got caught red-handed fabricating climate evidence.  Your people are all on the climate change hysteria payroll.  Over 100 billion dollars so far meted out to "scientists" who'll come up with the "right" conclusions. 

vofreason's picture

I can't believe there are this many climate deniers in the world let alone one website.  One main thing I can't get over is that even if the fact that the whole rest of the world (no other country has this Brietbart inspired stupidity) and the entire scientific community isn't enough to sway your little minds....

...can't we all agree that the very same things that cause climate change are also just causing the Earth to be a dirty, disgusting mess with pollution and loss of wildlife everywhere?  

Why do you all want to put off changing our ways so that we can keep fighting wars for oil and dirty up the world when we could have clean, free energy instead?  It's right there for the taking now.  The only thing you get out of it is Exxon profits and conflict.  Why choose big oil profits and conflict instead of a clean planet with clean power and all kinds of great technological progress and benefit? 

SmallerGovNow2's picture

I can't believe anyone would believe that the earth's temperature can be reduced to a single number (GAST).  That is preposterous!  The error in such a model is HUGE. 


Second, CO2 is PLANT FOOD.  So no we CAN'T agree that "the very same things that cause climate change are also just causing the Earth to be dirty" because, you know, PHOTOSYNTHESIS!  It is the believers in AGW that are the science deniers... 

Sir John Bagot Glubb's picture

Thanks for the link.  That is very interesting.  Never seen anyone corellate history like that with the earth's climate.

lex parsimoniae's picture

Nice deflection
Like a huckster called out for his fraud you instantly switch to the next bleeding heart 'cause du jour'.
Your plea that "we all agree" is nothing more than a request for the producers of this nation to self-immolate at your alter of worship. Here's a newsflash for you: Production in the US is being done, right now, with stewardship of the earth as a very high priority. Perhaps you could visit some actual places where production is happening to see for yourself.

Sir John Bagot Glubb's picture

We came out of 4 ice ages.  Wyoming was tropical.  So what if the earth heats up one degree or less over the next 100 or 200 years?

Global warming is a Marxist scam to bum rush us into World Government and provides a basis for a World Tax scheme to fund World Government.  The average human exhales something like 800 lbs. of CO2 a year.  So they have a basis to tax everyone in the world for being alive. Leftists are all about finding a way to steal from others.  They are parasites by definition.

I read that Greenland is having one of the coldest summers it has had on record.

Indelible Scars's picture

Maybe that's because most people here live in the real world?

Ghostmaker's picture

Did you see that Michael Mann has lost his lawsuit in Canada against a denier?

CRM114's picture

Tricky to know where to start pulling this rubbish apart, so let's take the King in 'Alice..''s advice

1. Personal incredulity is no basis for argument

2. Lots of other countries think this; I've lived in two others. I dare say all of them do.

3. The entire scientific community doesn't

4. My mind isn't little. Stop trying the ad hominem attacks and answer the challenges put to the AGW theory. Except, you can't.

5. Have you attempted to calculate the sustainable population without any pollution or harming of wildlife? Based on sustainable community experiments, the sustainable population of the whole UK is 4 million. The current population is at least 65 million, and probably over 71 million including all the illegals. Which 67 million are you planning on killing?

6. The oil wars are a separate issue, and I await your attempt to show how renewables can provide RELIABLE power for the current world population.

7. You propose a straw man choice - very poor argument.


In your own time......

otschelnik's picture

Nobody in the global warming lobby will ever mention the biggest green house gas in the atmosophere is water. The fraud of human caused climate change can be proved thermodynamically as follows, comparing the energy debit of nitrogen (79%) oxygen (20%) water (at 25 C 2000 ppm at dew point) and CO2 (currently at the 'catastrophic' level of around 400 ppm).  

Let's assume that at 30 C there is a thunderstorm, and the temperature drops by dt = -5 C to 25 C, and humidity drops from 100% to 50% (about 2000 ppm to 1000 ppm), a common scenerio. 

Specific heat of the substances referenced are as follows:  Oxygen (O2) = .22 cal/g, Nitrogen (N2) = 0.25 cal/g, Water (H2O) = 1 cal/g, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) = 0.202 cal/g.  The proportional debit of thermal energy is as follows:

N2 790,000 ppm x .25 x -5 C = -987,500 

O2  200,000 ppm x .22 x -5 C = -220,000 

CO2       400 ppm x .202 x - 5 = -404 

Now, water is the only one which changes phase from a gas to liquid, and the vapor phase specific heat of water is 540 cal/g.  Therefore we add that on and we can see what proportional thermal debit arises: 

H2O    1,000 ppm x 1 x (-5 - 540) = -545,000  (over 2x the thermodynamic energy of oxygen!). 

The thermal debit of CO2 at today's concentration at temperature change of 30C to 25C and reduction of water content in the air from 100% to 50% is 404/(987,500 + 220,000 + 545,000) = 0.00023 of heat released in the atmosphere. 

Nobody has reputed the 1st law of thermodynamics, conservation of energy.  That's what a fraud global warming is.  



Dickweed Wang's picture

Good post! But don't try to explain physics to some of the morons on this site . . . you'll still get your down votes from some of those that believe the total bullshit of "man made global warming".

Northern Flicker's picture

Well said.  The FDA suggesting the "building blocks of life" now have to be governed by law is ridiculous and just shows the witchcraft that's been brought to true science.  Oxygen is now deemed a "drug" and CO2 is a "pollutant."  Of course, GMOs and glyphosate (a real pollutant) get a passing grade.  The FDA is a sick bunch.  They should all be made to hand in their resignations and start over again.

The Wedge's picture

Not to mention the fact that a planets temp is measured by water temp not ambient air. Basic science. The ocean transmits the planet heat budget. Air and land of course are not good conductors. There has been so much anti-science coming out of the Agw crowd for decades I stopped trying to keep up with it. And Nooooo, don't call any of it into question, that's not science. Ounce scientists come to a conclusion, you know, 97% of them, that's it, it can no longer be questioned. Science gets it right every time. They're never wrong.

shimmy's picture

The world could be covered in snow for an entire year and the global warming cultists would still say it was the warmest on record. 

The positive I guess is that more people seem to be realizing it is a complete scam so with luck, maybe in 5-10 years this bullshit will finally end. The "scientists" who take part in this scam should be ashamed.  

Northern Flicker's picture

It's happening; from audiences I observe, there is an approximate 250% increase in scientific community numbers now believing there is a warming "slowdown" happening.  Of course, most believe it's temporary, but what else could they say?

ipso_facto's picture

'World Democracy'?  Who is this chump?

Ricki13th's picture

So an iceberg the size of a US state just broke off but I guess everyone thinks Global warming is a complete sham yet these elites wants to break away from civilization and go underground or go into space.

Ban KKiller's picture

"Global warming" is now called "climate change". That should explain it! 

Moving and Grooving's picture

I saw a new one last week (new to me) - 'Climate Disruption'. Pretty soon it'll be 'Climate Armeggedon'.

DCVoyeur's picture

WOW simple think.  Everything is so simple to you cause you cannot grasp anything more complex. 

Ghostmaker's picture

Hate to break to you but it's not the first time and historically it's not the largest. But we all know your side loves to blow things out of proportion. I would suggest you widen your sources of information and learn how to critically think.


However, in satellite images from the 1980s, the rift was already clearly a long-established feature, and there is no direct evidence to link its recent growth to either atmospheric warming, which is not felt deep enough within the ice shelf, or ocean warming, which is an unlikely source of change given that most of Larsen C has recently been thickening. It is probably too early to blame this event directly on human-generated climate change.

Geoengineering_Genocide's picture

Even Scientific American has joined in on the disinfo campaign.  They cite zero data for their assertions, and they make no mention at all of this -

Just look at a chart.  It's simple.  Everyone here loves financial charts, why not other charts?  

Moving and Grooving's picture

And since that's never ever happened before, you're convinced this is the end of the world.


Regarding elites and their plans - what's it to you what they squander their money on? In the 50's and 60's REGULAR people were digging bomb shelters in their back yards all across America, convinced the Russians were going to bomb the US. How's that work out? I remember then people would brag about them. They thought they were the smartest folks in town. Kind of like you do, I guess.

Geoengineering_Genocide's picture

Seriously, this article proves more than most that zerohedge has become a mass media disinformation machine.

No mention of this shit at all - India records it's highest temperature ever at 123.8 fahrenheit.  Just do a search for "record high temperature in india", you get scores of articles about it.  Thousands died from it.  But that's just a hoax, right? - A massive iceberg the SIZE OF DELAWARE just broke off.  If there was no warming, how did this happen?  Have any of you even looked at any of the data? - Watch "hacking the planet" documentary, only 40 mins. - Watch this 26 second graphic. If you can't see the simplicity of higher global temperatures, there is no hope for you.  Continue being delusional.   

We are in the sixth mass extinction in the Earth's history.  Search for "sixth mass extinction".


dlfield's picture

"India records it's highest temperature ever at 123.8 fahrenheit."

Wow.  Who gives a shit?  And this is meaningless.  Compare it to:

"On the afternoon of July 10, 1913, the United States Weather Bureau recorded a high temperature of 134 °F (56.7 °C) at Greenland Ranch (now Furnace Creek) in Death Valley.[5] This temperature stands as the highest ambient air temperature ever recorded at the surface of the Earth. (A report of a temperature of 58 °C (136.4 °F) recorded in Libya in 1922 was later determined to be inaccurate.)"

DCVoyeur's picture

WOW new record hottest temperature ever was just recorded in Iran at 139 degreese F.  Simple thinking makes you a stupid hick

Ura Slave's picture

It is not even close to the biggest break off ever recorded.  Did you know this?  Southern polar ice mass has increased 20% over the last several decades.  Ice flows, and as it flows, it thins as it edges out into warmer territory.  Of course it is going to break off.  This is part of a natural ebb and flow of the polar ice.  The ice will shrink back, and the alarmists will gasp, and try to blame each other, and then, it will grow again, and this will be hidden from you, again.  Human intervention in global climate is a massive anti-human scam that taps into the self loathing that is beaten into every young mind from the very earliest years via post modern brainwashing in the media and schools.

AchtungAffen's picture

Really? You've got to be kidding me... And where was this published? I mean, where it's published reflects on the quality of peer review. What I've seen so far is a wordpress site... I guess nobody here googled Wallace, D'Aleo or Ipso. Or the "reviewers" with such prominent people in the field like Alan Carlin (the dude from "temps decreased from 2002 to 2009" anyone?).

Wallace is an unknown.



Really ZH? That topical inflammation on your cervixes y'all seems to be blocking the flow of oxygen to yer brains...

Dickweed Wang's picture

Yeah, the bio info on Wikipedia is never manipulated for propaganda purposes, right?

AchtungAffen's picture

Might be. Now present the evidence that it was manipulated and that what it says on these folks is false. You seem to give more credibilty to a wordpress published pseudo-paper though. If I had to choose between that and Wikipedia, the answer is obvious.

fourQ's picture

Thanks for the info, 

So a religious nut and a "An outspoken global warming skeptic known for claiming that rising CO2 levels will have mainly positive environmental effects,"  publish an obscure paper that's technically available for peer review but ignored as you would ignore any piece of crap from nobodies. For ZH to put out that the paper has been peer reviewed implying that's it has broad censuses is misleading and really just Bullshit.

I don't know anything about climate science and I'm not stating one position versus another but I can clearly see someone pushing bullshit. This article is bullshit.

Common  ZH, you can't call CNN fake news and then turn around and pull this crap.

Geoengineering_Genocide's picture

You don't have to be an expert to discern how bullshit this is.  

Geoengineering_Genocide's picture

Most people here never do any research beyond the hedge.  They trust the Tylers with absolute conviction.  Conservatives have been duped into thinking the planet's life support systems are not collapsing, so they won't do anything about it.  Incredible how many of them never can see any data beyond their own delusion.