Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data"

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Mac Slavo via SHTFplan.com,

As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:

In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.

 

As a result, this research sought to validate the current estimates of GAST using the best available relevant data. This included the best documented and understood data sets from the U.S. and elsewhere as well as global data from satellites that provide far more extensive global coverage and are not contaminated by bad siting and urbanization impacts. Satellite data integrity also benefits from having cross checks with Balloon data.

 

The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming.

 

Finally, since GAST data set validity is a necessary condition for EPA’s GHG/CO2 Endangerment Finding, it too is invalidated by these research findings. (Full Abstract Report)

Of course, this won’t stop global climate normalcy deniers from saying it’s all one big conspiracy to destroy the earth. They’ll naturally argue that data adjustments to the temperatures need to be made for a variety of reasons, which is something the report doesn’t dispute. What it does show, however, is that these “adjustments” always prove to be to the upside. Always warmer, never cooler:

While the notion that some “adjustments” to historical data might need to be made is not challenged, logically it would be expected that such historical temperature data adjustments would sometimes raise these temperatures, and sometimes lower them. This situation would mean that the impact of such adjustments on the temperature trend line slope is uncertain. However, each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history.

In short: The evidence has been falsified.

Karl Denninger sums it up succinctly:

It is therefore quite-clear that the data has been intentionally tampered with.

 

Since this has formed the basis for plans to steal literal trillions of dollars and has already resulted in the forced extraction of hundreds of billions in aggregate for motorists and industry this quite-clearly constitutes the largest economic fraud ever perpetrated in the world.

 

I call for the indictment and prosecution of every person and organization involved, asset-stripping all of them to their literal underwear.

The real data looks something like this:

global-warming-data1

(Via ZeroHedge.com)

And the establishment, along with their fanatical global warming myrmidons, continue to push the need for massive, costly initiatives to reduce green house gases and global temperatures to “normal” levels.

The problem, of course, is that there is no global warming according to the above referenced report.

Moreover, none of those supporting the Paris Climate Agreement and other initiatives have any idea what these behemoth regulations will actually do to curb climate change, as evidenced by the following video of Miami Beach Mayor Philip Levine, who despite his best efforts, can’t seem to figure out exactly how these agreements actually lower temperatures and help Americans:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Defecation's picture

Not published in a journal halfway decent. You just hang onto the tiniest morsel that agrees with your worldview and rub your tummy with contentment with a job well done. The 100s of other papers that directly contradict this paper are still out there. And earthly cycles don't span a century, they usually span hundreds of thousands of years, so anyone with a modicum of intuition should know something might be up. If the earth cycled every century life couldn't've evolved.

Ghostmaker's picture

Just because your side publishes lies more  the truth will always win. To heck with your globalistic views.

selahgreene's picture

"A journal 'halfway decent'" means a journal globalist 'scientists' approve of.   Propaganda journals.  There is no more integrity in the scientific world than there is in the political or media world.  It's all about agenda, about money, about global socialism.      

  Many of the same scientists that today scream "Global Warming" and "The Science is Settled" were, 40 years ago, screaming "Imminent Ice Age,"  "We're All Going to Freeze,"  "We Must Sterilize the World,"  and, of course, "The Science is Settled" - we're going into a catastrophic ice age unless we have "A planetary regime of forced mass abortions and forced mass sterilization" - John Holdren, former Obama 'Science Czar.'   

   The old saw used to be "every statistician is a liar; but not every liar is a statistician."  Now it is "every computer modeler is a liar, but not every liar is a computer modeler."   The warming alarmists are so blatant in their data massaging that they are a joke - manipulate the old data until we can show the earth has recently warmed, regardless of how blatant the manipulation is.     These 'scientists' would make great golf caddies for Dear Leader Kim Jong Un - he gets at least 3 or 4 holes-in-one every time he does a round of golf (and his caddies know how to keep that score; if they don't, they are shot).  At a UN conference in Brussels in February of 2015, Executive Secreatary of UN Framework Convention of Climate Christiana Digueres admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity, but to destroy capitalism; or, as she put it, "change the economic development model of the past 150 years [capitalism]"; the typical 'Progressive' tyrannical mindset, best openly explained by Obama chief of Staff turned Chicago Mayor Rahm Emmanuel "Never let a crisis go to waste."   For a worldwide installation of globalist socialism, a manufactured worldwide crisis is needed.   The "Imminent Ice Age" disaster didn't quite work out, so now it's "Global Warming."  And, since that is being regularly debunked, it is now "Climate Change" and overpopulation.   The leftists will create any chicken little disaster necessary to implement global control.   'Science', manipulated, is just the tool.       

  

 

DCVoyeur's picture

NOOO moron many of the SAME scientists from the 70s did not say that.  It was a theory put forth NOT supportd by the scientific organization or indepth studies. 

All your BS excuses are just that.  This is a scientific argument and all you know is he said she said.  

tuetenueggel's picture

simple, but not agreed by climate changing moneymakers.

 

Expat's picture

I am not sure why deniers keep trotting out this rather lame argument.  After all, there is a lot more money on the denial/ignore side than on the climate change side.  Are you saying that oil, gas, car and coal companies are honest and have the interests of humanity at heart?  Are you that fricking stupid?  Don't bother to answer; your post already did.

Grahampa's picture

Are you saying that oil, gas, car and coal companies have a lot more money than governments with printing presses and the capacity to tax those companies? AND governments have big hearts? Are you a fucking moron?

Ink Pusher's picture

Must Read : 'Heartbeat of the Sun from Principal Component Analysis and prediction of solar activity on a millenium timescale'

V. V. Zharkova1,2,*, S. J. Shepherd3,*, E. Popova4,* & S. I. Zharkov5,*"

From 2015 (technical):    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/68bb/32e4821bf0a6d5ccca7eba6af7c1eee91e...

From 2015 (simple):        http://www.ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Publications/Information_Papers/...

From 1976 : (historical): http://www.atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca/people/guido/PHY2502/articles/sola...

pipes's picture

They say the necessity of adjusting the data is NOT disputed...just that the adjustments would sometimes be higher, sometimes lower...

Then I would argue that IN FACT, NO ADJUSTMENTS ARE NECESSARY. On average these adjustments would cancel out each other, making the original figures just as reliable as the adjusted ones, AND THERE IS NO OPPORTUNITY FOR BIASED AGENDAS to insinuate themselves.

I don't give a shit what anyone says..."adjustments" = SUBJECTIVITY, and subjectivity is ripe for bias.

Posa's picture

While we're at it, here's another very significant paper that uses ice cores to determine whether CO2 leads temperature rises on Earth or follow rises that occur becasue of orbital change around the sun, as wll as the pitch of the planet relative to the sun.

http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/cp-2017-71/cp-2017-71.pdf

This paper has gotten to very fine resolution down to the century an decade level... The finding confirmed that during the end of the last ice age, between 18,000 and 11,000 years BP, temperature and and CO2 levels were simultaneous. In other words, the planet didn't warm because CO2 levels rose. When there was a cold recovery in Antarctica, temperature cooled first, then CO2 levels decreased.

tuetenueggel's picture

antarctoica is getting colder and colder since more then 50 years. average temperatures are decrasing in antarctica and slowly rising in arctic region.

Serious scientists found out, that submerged streaming waters in oceans are getting warmer and warmer.

They are from northern oceans origin and flow down to antarctica. Producing more rain/snow.

MoreFreedom's picture

"global climate normalcy deniers"

An excellent choice of words, though it leaves out the fact they lie to get money taken from taxpares via force to fund their data manipulation and lifestyles.

Is-Be's picture

Get it through your thick skull that they don't need your tax money.

They have the printing press.

They garnish your wages to ensure that you only have enough to keep the dream alive.

Just like the donkey dreaming of catching the carrot.

Grahampa's picture

So they're just squirreling all that tax money away? Burying it? Burning it? Making papier mache pinatas? If they don't need or want it, why do they take it? What do they do with it?

SwiffFiffteh's picture

They take it to dampen human activity, to slow things down, to repress ingenuity. 

MaskOfZero's picture

The takeaway from this massive global pseudo scientific fraud is that an expensive lie can be perpertuated upon the global masses as long as the MSM and the political/economic/social/cultural elites cooperate.

 

The global warming lie is frighening because it begs the question:  What else have they been lying about for political reasons?

tuetenueggel's picture

guess everything we shall believe. They want to keep us stupid. As stupid as they are themselves.

fourQ's picture

A religious nut and a "An outspoken global warming skeptic known for claiming that rising CO2 levels will have mainly positive environmental effects,"  publish an obscure paper that's technically available for peer review but ignored as you would ignore any piece of crap from nobodies.  No big deal , happens every day, what sucks is ZH takes that and spins that the paper has been peer reviewed by "administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities," implying that's it has broad censuses. That is misleading and really just plain Bullshit. Guess what, they have reviewed my balls as well and none of them have said they don't taste great!

I don't know anything about climate science and I'm not stating one position versus another but I can clearly see someone pushing bullshit. This article is bullshit.

Common  ZH, your worse fake news than CNN. 

tuetenueggel's picture

all crops, trees and flowers need co² to live and produce energy ba fotosynthesis.

Allways been sick in school ? Co² prevents earth from an extreme sunlight in the UV-region.

Without co² life on earth would soon be impossible. We would freeze to death.

tuetenueggel's picture

When all ice in my fridge will be molten, world will drown but first Diego Garcia will be

submerged. How pretty pics that will deliver ?!Swimming B52 old metal

Dead Indiana Sky's picture

What are YOUR experiences?  What do YOU see?  Here in the Midwest, in 40 years.......more 90 degree days.....less snow.....more violent storms.  I've seen it change.  To hell with slanted studies, regardless of which side they're on.

Ura Slave's picture

Anecdotal evidence is not scientific evidence.

Is-Be's picture

One anecdote is one data point.

You are appealing to people not to believe the evidence of their own eyes.

This malady is well covered by Dr. Iain McGilchrist on YouTube.  The left brain is unaware of the existence of the Right brain and it believes its MODELS are Reality.

Rabbitnexus's picture

To be fair it is indeed scientific evidence. However science requires it to be evaluated as well, and in the evaluation it lacks much validity.  What does hold some validity I think at least related to rising sea levels is that my own observations of 50 years have not seen the highest tide water marks at the local harbour reached even once. This can be coupled with the fact that Western Australia is extremely geologically ancient and stable. The landscape of our end of the continent which itself is the oldest and most stable continent tectonically besides Antarctica, is also very flat and of low elevation. The coastline where it is rocky has remained exactly the same all my life.

My own anecdotal evidence, provided it is truthful which it is does challenge the idea that seas are warming even if it doesn't disprove it on it's own. meanwhile the only thing his 40 year observation tells us is that the climate has varied towards the warmer in his lifetime. not really a big deal by any standards given the brevity and local nature of such a phenomenon.  I can say we've not had any very hot years in this state of Western Australia as hot as some in the seventies and maybe once in the nineties.  However the sea level is not rising here I can attest to that.

Expat's picture

Neither is anecdotal belief.

Evil Liberals's picture

40 years, OH WOW. Suggest you review the geologic record and the ice core results of thousands of years or even hundreds of thousands of years - then you can get a good glimpse of temp activity on planet earth.

Rabbitnexus's picture

WOAH!  40 years you say?  Well that is a huge data set.  Frankly even the nutty 6000 year old earth creationistas wouldn't see that as very representative or useful for long term prediction. Do you not understand the planet has known ice ages and warmer times than anything we can imagine? We're at the end of an ice age now, not even out of it and therefore temperatures will be slowly climbing.  Though 4000 years might be more useful if you have the data...oh and we do and voila, we see times have even been warmer in that period in some places.

Here's what I have noticed in my 54 years.  (an even bigger data set) the highest historical tide water marks down at the local harbour in Fremantle have not been touched in my lifetime. Think about it.  Seas rising eh?  Hmm, maybe just some places are sinking and some are rising like always.  The planet is not a solid rock you know but an agglomerated ball of segments floating on a fluid ball with rocks, mud and water in between.

indio007's picture

The sample size is 2 small by several orders of magnitude.

There are only 6K thermometers measuring temp data worldwide. 80% are in one hemisphere.

So there is basically 1 thermometer per 23K sq miles of surface..

 

 

There is no mathematical theorem,proof or conjecture that says you can model with such an extrapolation.

The entire idea that we know what the world-wide temperature is or what it's doing is baseless.

AchtungAffen's picture

There are these things called satellites. Welcome to the XXI century pops.

Rabbitnexus's picture

So to you satellites have some magical power to blanket cover the whole planet in temperature measurements and remind us again for how long we have had them?  Are you seriously suggesting that temperature data from the few decades we have had sattelites or even modern/accurate and collective measurements is sufficient to determine anything about the long term temperature projection of a planet we already know has varied from ice ages and is at the tail end of one anyway and expected to be rising as it is?  Good grief you clowns are as ill informed and wacky as you are self righteous and blind to reason.

AchtungAffen's picture

We have satellites since the 70's. And they do cover the whole planet with measurements. Every day they do it faster and more precise. And with current measurements you can help cover certain deficiencies from the older instruments. As for paleoclimatology, there are several tools at disposal. Fossil records, ice cores, tree cores, geological strata, etc... For a long time we've had several ways of measurement besides the simple thermometer, like sea buoys too. We have a lot of information today, more knowledge and analytical tools to not only predict future temperatures, but also fill in the blanks from instrument deficiency from earlier data-sets. Of course, nothing is perfect. Science is not absolute. But AFAIK, the scientific method is still the best way to understand reality in an objective way.

indio007's picture

Satellites don't measure absolute temperature.

In fact, they don't measure temperature at all. They measure dispersion of certain wavelengths of EM and infer a temp from it.

There is no way to independently verify whether the accuracy of such devices.

 

 

Also WTH do you think the resolution of of the satellites is anyway?

 

You are just taking the claim that satellites measure temp on absolute blind faith when it's 3 inferential deductions removed from direct measurement.

Expat's picture

"Global climate change".  Global warming is global, not local.  The authors and the peer reviewers are NOT entirely credible (dismissing anyone attacking the authors is equally invalid, by the way, so stop being so smug, CRM114). 

The assumption that adjustments to temperature readings should be random is not necessarily valid, though I am not enough of a climate scientist to know why or whether that is true.  But, heck, if all the incredibly stupid and ignorant fuckwits here can dismiss any science they want based on their beliefs, so can I!

Whee!  Science is fun.  God says climate change is real, by the way, so all of you deniers will burn in hell where it's really hot! (no adjustments necessary).

Oh, and Trump is such an ignorant dickhead that he thinks 2 degrees C is insignificant.  LOL.

apocalypticbrother's picture

Luciferian pigs like al gore should have their day before a proper judge

Ura Slave's picture

Once you realize that facts simply do not matter to Post Modernists, you can see why the Global Warming con artists are so confident in their con.

 

I have been dealving into Post Modern philosophy for several months after hearing Dr. Jordan B. Peterson declare it the ultimate driving force, and enemy, in this bizarro world we find ourselves.  And he is exactly right.

 

http://www.stephenhicks.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/hicks-ep-full.pdf is one of the greatest resourses I have ever found for explaining exactly who is behind the mind bending weirdo ideas being tossed around by the so called "liberal" masses.  Liberalism has been conquered by Post Modern radicals.  Its that simple.  Once you understand exactly what Post Modernism is (a complete rejection of the entire Enlightenment / Modern system, through the use of subjective labelling and victim identity politics) everything makes sense.

gcjohns1971's picture

And when "everything" makes sense...nothing does.

apocalypticbrother's picture

I dont mean to haarp on this but when it comes to weather or not we survive let the stones guide you to see their Isis vision of the future. You will damn well get it soon enough.

Evil Liberals's picture

Next time you come across a liberal that mentions 'climate change', as if that phrase refers to GloBull Warming Climate Change or Natural Climate Change. Expect a blank stare.

 

CO2, the Magic Molecule that is responsible for everything in the Galaxy.

Ura Slave's picture

“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

-- The Club of Rome, pg. 75 'The First Global Revolution'

 

We are facing a post modern death cult bent on global hegemony, tapping into basic self loathing to bully the masses into submission.  It is not working on me.  You?

Radical Marijuana's picture

Karl Denninger sums it up succinctly:

It is therefore quite-clear that the data has been intentionally tampered with. Since this has formed the basis for plans to steal literal trillions of dollars and has already resulted in the forced extraction of hundreds of billions in aggregate for motorists and industry this quite-clearly constitutes the largest economic fraud ever perpetrated in the world.

Policies based on distorted climate data are TRIVIAL compared to the FUNDAMENTAL FRAUD of private banks making the public "money" supplies out of nothing as debts.  One thing that I am quite certain of is that Globalized Neolithic Civilization is almost totally based on ENFORCED FRAUDS, which is the overall context in which climate "science" has been distorted by its funding, in similar ways that everything else has!

For several decades I have been attempting to better understand the issues related to humans blamed for climate change (and have recorded my attempts to do that there for a decade.) Recently, I read one of the most DISTURBING articles regarding that issue.

LINK to the most mind-blowing & paradigm shifting,
article, which DEMOLISHES previous presumptions,
as I frequently stated regarding believing that the
"greenhouse gas" mechanisms were really REAL!

http://principia-scientific.org/publications/Role_of_GHE-EaE.pdf

Role of greenhouse gases in climate change

"... the concept of a ‘greenhouse gas’ or a ‘greenhouse effect’ has not been demonstrated ...

Wood RW. Note on the theory of the greenhouse, Philos M 1909; 17: 219–320, 13. He constructed two enclosures, one covered with a glass plate and the other covered with an IR transmitting rock salt plate. When adjusted so that both were exposed to the same solar input radiation, they both reached the same temperature of 55 C with ‘scarcely a difference of one degree between the temperatures of the two enclosures’. His experiment clearly showed that it was the presence of the enclosure itself that enabled the warming. Therefore, it is the heat generated by absorbed sunlight that becomes ‘trapped’. In the absence of an enclosure, the warmed air near the ground would rise by buoyancy and be replaced by cooler air from the surroundings thus cooling it. This natural convective cooling process is restricted and suppressed by the enclosure."
NukeChinaNow's picture

Whoa there!

I thought the Great Ape of Kenya made the declaration "But the debate is settled. Climate change is a fact".

?

But of course, doing what liars and politician types do best, LIE, of course the farging climate changes! Winter, Spring, Summer and Fall-all are "changes" so you can't call him a liar. ( I call the thing far worse things...but that's just because I'm SO sensitive and progressive. /s )

What is fact is man can't do a damned thing about it. OK. Actually that's just my 'fact' and I don't even pretend to no know all the answers, unlike Nye.

I'm just glad that thing is not pretending to be American anymore.

Now THAT'S THE CHANGE I can put my money on!

But hey, what do I know?

 

Apeon's picture

Global warming is DEAD..

 

NEXT up---- Species Extinction----- also Man caused!

Old Poor Richard's picture

The conclusions of the paper might be true, but it is not "peer reviewed" and it is not even published.  It's a white paper disseminated on a blog.  Fake news getting people's hopes up that there might be a validated and credible counter to global warming cultists and their fraudulent adjusted data--it's not.

DCVoyeur's picture

WOW the source of the data is the HEARTLAND Institute.  A right wing organization that is funded by the oil companies.  SOOO what do you expect them to say?Not only is it NOAA and NASA but every other scientific organization organization in the world. 

Just ignore the melting Arctic and melting Greenland and the mega droughts around the world and the military preparing for global warming etc etc etc.  NOPE the Heartland Institute is going to tell you the truth cause they are funded by a multi trillion dollar oil industry.   Now you morons can attack Hanson and Gore and the climatologist in the world.  

They have made PUNKS out of all of you

SwiffFiffteh's picture

Right. While you follow the multi-multi-multi-trillion dollar industry of AGW, funded by governments all over the globe. Governments who happen to actually fucking own the vast majority of the world's oil reserves, and are either drilling for it themselves or selling the rights to do so to those oil companies you hate so much. 

Does it hurt to be that fucking stupid? 

Give Me Some Truth's picture

Apparently the "consensus" ain't a consensus.

Grahampa's picture

It's a CON sensus. Oops twitchy finger today