LA County Admits Number Of Registered Voters At 144% Of Resident Citizens Of Voting Age

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Mike Shedlock via,

The Election Integrity Project California provides a list of 11 California counties that have more registered voters than voting-age citizens.

In addition, Los Angeles County officials informed the project that “the number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

The Election Integrity Project California, Inc. has joined Judicial Watch, Inc., a non-partisan organization in Washington, D.C., in sending a National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA”) Section 8 notice of violation letter to California Secretary of State, Alex Padilla.

NVRA Complaint Excerpts

Dear Secretary Padilla:


From public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission (“EAC”) 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey (“EAVS”), and through verbal accounts from various county agencies, eleven (11) counties in California have more total registered voters than citizen voting age population (CVAP) calculated by the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey. This is strong circumstantial evidence that California municipalities are not conducting reasonable voter registration list maintenance as mandated under the NVRA.


This letter serves as statutory notice that Election Integrity Project California, Inc., a registered non-profit corporation in California, and Judicial Watch, Inc., will bring a lawsuit against you and, if appropriate, against the counties named in this letter, if you do not take specific actions to correct these violations of Section 8 within 90 days.


The following information explains how we determined that your state and the counties named are in violation of NVRA Section 8 and the remedial steps that must be taken to comply with the law.


1. Eleven California Counties Have More Total Registered Voters Than Citizen Voting Age Population

Based on our review of 2016 EAC EAVS report, the 2011-2015 U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, and the most recent California total active and total inactive voter registration records, California is failing to comply with the voter registration list maintenance requirements of Section 8 of the NVRA. For example, a comparison of the 2011-2015 U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, and the most recent California active and inactive voter registration records shows there were more total registered voters than there were adults over the age of 18 living in each of the following eleven (11) counties: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%). Our own research shows that the situation in these counties is, if anything, worse than the foregoing data suggest. For example, we contacted Los Angeles County directly this past June. At that time, county officials informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.


2. The NVRA Requires You to Undertake Reasonable Efforts to Maintain Accurate Lists of Eligible Registered Voters


3. Failure to Comply with NVRA Subjects You to Lawsuits and Financial Costs

In passing the NVRA, Congress authorized a private right of action to enforce the provisions of the NVRA, including Section 8. Accordingly, private persons may bring a lawsuit under the NVRA if the violations identified herein are not corrected within 90 days of receipt of this letter.


4. Avoiding Litigation

We hope you will promptly initiate efforts to comply with Section 8 so that no lawsuit will be necessary. We ask you and, to the extent that they wish to respond separately, each county identified in this letter, to please respond to this letter in writing no later than 30 days from today informing us of the compliance steps you are taking. Specifically, we ask you to: (1) conduct or implement a systematic, uniform, nondiscriminatory program to remove from the list of eligible voters the names of persons who have become ineligible to vote by reason of a change in residence; and (2) conduct or implement additional routine measures to remove from the list of eligible voters the names of persons who have become ineligible to vote by reason of death, change in residence, or a disqualifying criminal conviction, and to remove noncitizens who have registered to vote unlawfully.


5. Production of Records

Finally, pursuant to your obligations under the NVRA,15 your office and, to the extent that they keep records separately from your office, each county named in this letter, should make available to us all pertinent records concerning “the implementation of programs and activities conducted for the purpose of ensuring the accuracy and currency” of California’s official eligible voter lists during the past 2 years. Please include these records with your response to this letter.


I hope that the concerns identified in this letter can be resolved amicably. However, if we believe you do not intend to correct the above-identified problems, a federal lawsuit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against you may be necessary. We look forward to receiving your prompt response.


s/ Robert D. Popper
Robert D. Popper
Attorney, Judicial Watch, Inc.

Here is the full six-page NVRA Letter to California Secretary of State, Alex Padilla.

Key Questions

  1. How bad is actual fraud vs. possible fraud?
  2. How much is purposeful fraud (letting noncitizens) on the voter rolls?
  3. How often do the dead and nonresidents vote?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
NihilistZerO___'s picture

This is a federal issue. People voting illegally are disenfranchising other voters. I think this ends badly for the Dems if it is pursued.

El Vaquero's picture

Judicial Watch seems to be tenacious.  I think it will be pursued.  

Hulk's picture

Everyone, we got this thing, we just need to keep pounding and support Trump. WE WILL TAKE THIS COUNTRY BACK ...

grizfish's picture

WE sure will, and it will go to the Repubs who are in bed with the dems.  It's all a big circle jerk.

stacking12321's picture

this is a GOOD THING!

hopefully all people will become disenfranchised voters, and will see the entire farce called government as a scam to control people and their wealth.

once people stop believing in the myth of government, we can build real solutions.

tion's picture

This is only half of the story. The other half is that House apportionment is based on raw census numbers including non-citizen residents and illegal aliens. Even without illegal ballots being cast, sanctuary cities allow lawless areas to capture more House reps than their legal citizen  only population count would give them. In Cali some stupid amount like 13%+ of residents are not citizens (prob higher than that..)

tmosley's picture

Die in prison?

Or perhaps on the gallows.

veritas semper vinces's picture

CA  is aiming to reach Kim Jong Un approval rating for the next Democrat candidate to WH. They studied his methods 

tion's picture

You mean they studied puppet Syngman Rhee and the success of the complete obfuscation of the true history of the KW? Summer of Terror... 

SoDamnMad's picture

Forget about Democrats fixing this voter fraud.  Verifiable paper ballots with ID and proof of citizenship would be RACIST, therefore we will never get them as long as Democrats have any power.  Never mind that Guyana requires ID + proof of citizenship + an address check.  Guyanans can't be racist  because they aren't white.

tmosley's picture

Shit his pants while he sways from a lamp post, hopefully.

NukeChinaNow's picture

Exactly what we know they will do. Deny, obfuscate, lie and of course blame Trump. Bush is gone and the monkey could accept no blame for ANYTHING not considered saintly so President Triumph is the next Great EscapeGoat. ( Thank God he's an American )

You have to have ID to buy cigarettes but not to vote?

These "people" are Fucked Up!

I can personally guarantee that if President Triumph starts importing EUROPEAN asylum seekers the racists will quickly retreat and demand immigration quotas.

But hey, what do I know?


BarkingCat's picture

It is a federal law so the lawsuit goes to a federal court. 

People'sRepublicof CT's picture

someone has some 'splain' to do

Canadian Dirtlump's picture

Here we reflect, again, that the world is exactly as shitty as we thought it was, and that Trump being elected has God's fingerprints all over it, and we're coming to the end of the line because of it.

Sanity Bear's picture

IMO the scale of fraud is on the same order of magnitude as the number of votes Clinton allegedly received.

LibertarianMenace's picture

But, but, but, the popular vote!

bonin006's picture

Yes, now we see proof that Hillary winning the popular vote was fraud.

Normalcy Bias's picture

Sounds like just another reason to kick California out of the Union...

ReturnOfDaMac's picture

Agree, my bags are packed. I'll be there!  Escape from the jeebuz land ...

Vilfredo Pareto's picture

Lol.  Jeebus land is OK.  You can get laid just as easily here as anywhere else. The music is horrible but you have Sirius and google play music.  It is cheap to live here and it isnt a constant hustle and bustle.  Yeah weed isn't legal, but honestly if it were I wouldn't enjoy it.  Half the fun is plotting and sneaking around.

ReturnOfDaMac's picture

Liberty is freedom to choose your own persuit of happiness so long as don't infringe on that right for others.  So if you like it, I love it brother.  But for gods sake don't get cought.  Enjoy, all I wish for you is happiness and peace!


SoDamnMad's picture

Please kick them out just before the next 9.0 earthquake rips through SF.  Do the repair costs end for all the unmaintained dams in the state?  What will be the customs charges for all the goods landing in LA harbor that then pass to the US (can CA afford to pay them in gold which is the only asset the US will accept from this sovereign country)?  Questions that I am sure moonbeam hasn't thought of.

slwsnowman40's picture

Because of the global warming crowd, port activities have been trending downwards.  So it is likely products destined to the US (sans California) would go to another port.

ReturnOfDaMac's picture

Why would they pay in gold?  Nobody uses gold 'cept some middle east countries.  They will pay in some form of fiat just like everybody else.  As for the quakes, been to Omaha? Tennessee?  Frackland, USA?  Whising I'll on others can possibly backfire.  CA is used to quakes and has had over 100 years to prepare for 'em. They don't make many houses out of bricks.  Not so true in flyover, bricks hurt when they fall during quakes ...

ZeroFreedom's picture

Guess this will hep with CalExit.

LibertarianMenace's picture

And that will help the rest of us. Let's see how well they do w/o MIC contracts, hahahaha...

El Vaquero's picture

More like, lets see how they do if their a huge chunk of their farmers depart the state, or the rural areas of CA secede from the state.  

LibertarianMenace's picture

That won't help them either. The rest of the country is up against a half dozen pinpoints of blue light. That's it.

espirit's picture

I think that as a non-existent California citizen, I deserve a non-existent CalPers retirement pension.


Chuck Walla's picture

"Guess this will hep with CalExit."

Well, they cetainly have the votes if they need extras.

lennysrv's picture

But Hillary won the popular vote, dammit!

tmosley's picture

>tfw you bet big on the cunt winning by any amount less than 0.5% of the popular vote

>tfw you will never in a million years get that money, even though she lost by a fucking mile

The_Juggernaut's picture

But Hillary won the popular vote!

JimmyRainbow's picture

all russians, some of them invisible because darknet ransom crypto

Haitian Snackout's picture

Add in all the eligible people who aren't registered to vote. No wonder my vote never counted. Even when they actually counted them.

Mr T's picture

Euh, sh, wha, but, none ur bidness, uh, sh, phlltt


any_mouse's picture

Requiring photo ID at the polls would disenfranchise those non-existent registered voters.

Can't have that.

Anarchyteez's picture

Nope. They giv'm those too.

El Vaquero's picture

Implying that non-existent people are too incompetent to get an ID.  Why are you so bigoted against non-existent people?  

order66's picture

Two things:

1. California is about as deep blue as a state can be. Will never vote Red no matter how much fraud.

2. Electoral College makes this article a moot point.

VWAndy's picture

 If that were true why stuff the ballot boxes?

LibertarianMenace's picture

"2. Electoral College makes this article a moot point."


 Two more:

3. Then Proggies need to be told by other Proggies that they're woefully uninformed.

4. Thanks in advance for your support.

Blankenstein's picture

Why do you keep defending criminal behavior?  

NukeChinaNow's picture

California makes the city of Chicongo's criminal activity seem like a kindergarten game.

Be of good cheer. It will soon go the way of Detroit and every other democrat run criminal enterprise because soon it will be in the hands of the half-breeds like  Holder.

But hey, what do I know?