LA County Admits Number Of Registered Voters At 144% Of Resident Citizens Of Voting Age

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

The Election Integrity Project California provides a list of 11 California counties that have more registered voters than voting-age citizens.

In addition, Los Angeles County officials informed the project that “the number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

The Election Integrity Project California, Inc. has joined Judicial Watch, Inc., a non-partisan organization in Washington, D.C., in sending a National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA”) Section 8 notice of violation letter to California Secretary of State, Alex Padilla.

NVRA Complaint Excerpts

Dear Secretary Padilla:

 

From public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission (“EAC”) 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey (“EAVS”), and through verbal accounts from various county agencies, eleven (11) counties in California have more total registered voters than citizen voting age population (CVAP) calculated by the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey. This is strong circumstantial evidence that California municipalities are not conducting reasonable voter registration list maintenance as mandated under the NVRA.

 

This letter serves as statutory notice that Election Integrity Project California, Inc., a registered non-profit corporation in California, and Judicial Watch, Inc., will bring a lawsuit against you and, if appropriate, against the counties named in this letter, if you do not take specific actions to correct these violations of Section 8 within 90 days.

 

The following information explains how we determined that your state and the counties named are in violation of NVRA Section 8 and the remedial steps that must be taken to comply with the law.

 

1. Eleven California Counties Have More Total Registered Voters Than Citizen Voting Age Population

Based on our review of 2016 EAC EAVS report, the 2011-2015 U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, and the most recent California total active and total inactive voter registration records, California is failing to comply with the voter registration list maintenance requirements of Section 8 of the NVRA. For example, a comparison of the 2011-2015 U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, and the most recent California active and inactive voter registration records shows there were more total registered voters than there were adults over the age of 18 living in each of the following eleven (11) counties: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%). Our own research shows that the situation in these counties is, if anything, worse than the foregoing data suggest. For example, we contacted Los Angeles County directly this past June. At that time, county officials informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.

 

2. The NVRA Requires You to Undertake Reasonable Efforts to Maintain Accurate Lists of Eligible Registered Voters

 

3. Failure to Comply with NVRA Subjects You to Lawsuits and Financial Costs

In passing the NVRA, Congress authorized a private right of action to enforce the provisions of the NVRA, including Section 8. Accordingly, private persons may bring a lawsuit under the NVRA if the violations identified herein are not corrected within 90 days of receipt of this letter.

 

4. Avoiding Litigation

We hope you will promptly initiate efforts to comply with Section 8 so that no lawsuit will be necessary. We ask you and, to the extent that they wish to respond separately, each county identified in this letter, to please respond to this letter in writing no later than 30 days from today informing us of the compliance steps you are taking. Specifically, we ask you to: (1) conduct or implement a systematic, uniform, nondiscriminatory program to remove from the list of eligible voters the names of persons who have become ineligible to vote by reason of a change in residence; and (2) conduct or implement additional routine measures to remove from the list of eligible voters the names of persons who have become ineligible to vote by reason of death, change in residence, or a disqualifying criminal conviction, and to remove noncitizens who have registered to vote unlawfully.

 

5. Production of Records

Finally, pursuant to your obligations under the NVRA,15 your office and, to the extent that they keep records separately from your office, each county named in this letter, should make available to us all pertinent records concerning “the implementation of programs and activities conducted for the purpose of ensuring the accuracy and currency” of California’s official eligible voter lists during the past 2 years. Please include these records with your response to this letter.

 

I hope that the concerns identified in this letter can be resolved amicably. However, if we believe you do not intend to correct the above-identified problems, a federal lawsuit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against you may be necessary. We look forward to receiving your prompt response.

 

Sincerely,
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
s/ Robert D. Popper
Robert D. Popper
Attorney, Judicial Watch, Inc.

Here is the full six-page NVRA Letter to California Secretary of State, Alex Padilla.

Key Questions

  1. How bad is actual fraud vs. possible fraud?
  2. How much is purposeful fraud (letting noncitizens) on the voter rolls?
  3. How often do the dead and nonresidents vote?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
IENTJ's picture

Democracy: the continuation of gang warfare by other means ...

passerby's picture

They vote forever in California's safe zones for the dead.

sinbad2's picture

USA, democracy for amateurs.

Centerist's picture

I seem to recall that you once complained that Turnbull works for the US ambassador.  If that is so, then what does that say about the Australian democracy?

Personally, I think that your claim about Turnbull is an insult to both him and to all Australians.  It implies that you are not just amateurs but actually incompetent in the administration of your democratic processes.  Aside from that little mistake of collectively disarming, I'd say that you guys are doing just fine and that things aren't as dire as you make them out to be.

Jar jar Binks's picture

Lets get Mueller to investigate this instead of the bull shit Russia thing.

 

Thom Paine's picture

Meuller not interested in real things, just the make believe witch hunt for deep state.

passerby's picture

Let's see Russia get out of this one.

sheikurbootie's picture

Simple solution. 

Forbid them from voting in Federal elections.

Korprit_Phlunkie's picture

This is how it works. i have wroitten it here on ZH several times in the past. In san fran and LA and other big demon rat union hoods the precinct workers mark a bunch of fake ballots for the chosen demon on election night. They have the books, the records,and the ballots. then they go turn them into a demon rat who is even more corrupt than they are who counts them (and you know demonrats don't know math.) and they all just nod at each other knowingly of the same commie tribe. They mark enough fake ballots to overcome even if EVERY republican in the rest of the counties voted against the demon rat. I can't explain every detail of their collusion, this post would be 5000 words . Imagine every cheating lying underhanded thing you can and then realize the demon rats are doing much worse. Satan is their father and deciet is his weapon.

VWAndy's picture

 If half the gen pop does not vote. An 144% are reg? We have a super majority of fraud.

Maybe cali aint as nutty as it seems from the outside.

swamp's picture

Jeff Sessions is where?

indygo55's picture

He's hiding in a shack in Wyoming shivering with fear that the Clintons are going to arkanside him if he opens his mouth. 

SmedleyButlersGhost's picture

If he opens his mouth, he should be more afraid of what Obama will do to him

Ajax-1's picture

That is an excellent question? I can't seem to find Jeff on a myriad of criminal problem children that are in desperate need of attention.

kenny500c's picture

And yet every single story says Trump is alleging voter fraud "without any evidence."

There is tons of evidence.

 

DjangoCat's picture

ElectionJusticeUSA came out with a very revealing report after the primaries, showing huge purges of voter lists in NYK and other egregious and obvious frauds, yet nothing comes of it.  Suits filed in eight states.  Do we ever hear a peep?

The whole thing is a piece of crap.  Time to withdraw.  Get out of fiat and pay no tax.

DjangoCat's picture

We need to become too many to jail.

opport.knocks's picture

Obviously all Russians, the fuckin bastards.

ChargingHandle's picture

With so much at stake and with millions of illegal votes cast this last November, we need CITIZEN/VOTER IDENTIFICATION CARDS.  

pparalegal's picture

It is a Russian plot to rig the electoral college election for Hillary. Maxine, Nancy Pelosi and my TV said so.

Infinityx2's picture

This because Maxine Waters has to give a lot of fucking blowjobs

Lanka's picture

Madonna promised; Maxine delivered.

Infinityx2's picture

Her skin smells like piss

SmittyinLA's picture

California doesn't verify any voter, in fact it's probably admistratively prohibited.

Feds started this by including non-citizens in congressional apportionment so if you cheat you get more congressmen and money.

barysenter's picture

Surprise, surprise. Did you know Korea is only full of Americans with PhDs, all on welfare? Same as Israhel, no gringos allowed.
Kill Them All

oncemore's picture

Confirmed minutes ago: anonymous sources at WAPO say the discrepancy  has to be attributed to the meeting Veselskaia-Kushner +Trump jn.

 

what is the fucktard Jeff Sessions doing?

Dank fur Kopf's picture

Bet the same fraud is found in New York.

This means corrupt Clinton didn't win the popular vote.

BritBob's picture

If the Argentinians can claim the Falklands because they inherited the islands from Spain under the legal doctrine of uti possidetis juris then the Mexicans can do likewise with California.

So, do the Argentinians and Mexicans have a legal case?

Falklands – Uti Possidetis Juris :

https://www.academia.edu/33316156/Falklands_Uti_Possidetis_Juris_II

 

DjangoCat's picture

Hello BritBob,

Maybe I miss some of your other causes, but this Faulklands thing seems a bnit of an obsession.  Is there really all that oil under them?

Collectivism Killz's picture

No, but they have a lot of sheep, which is still pretty good to most British men.

Pernicious Gold Phallusy's picture

Why do Brits prefer sex on the edges of cliffs? The sheep push back harder.

Horse Pizzle's picture

Ginsberg could live to vote on this. But it doesn't matter. She is out voted.;

Fireman's picture

From Bananas Republic to Tortilla Republik!

Glyndwr will return's picture

Sounds like your typical third world nation.

Then again, the war criminal and infamous traitor known as Tony Bliar got in here with 22% of the vote.

As David Blunkett said, if voting actually worked they would ban it.

FredFlintstone's picture

I remember when McDonald's had a voter registration form on their tray place mats. That pretty much said it all about where our republic was headed 30 years ago.

I work with a guy in his mid 60's who visited his mother in a nursing home shortly after the recent election. He found out that some young woman had taken her to vote and was laughing his ass off because she probably doesn't even know what decade it is. A Soros group probably funded that effort. That woman probably helped the senile lady push the "correct" buttons. 

Oh, and you can disregard this comment as I am just an inbred from fly over country.

Salzburg1756's picture

Limit voting to white males, problem solved.

ljag's picture

Here is an idea we can all love. Mandatory $fee$ ( start with a buck) charged at polling station.

1. Keep rif-raf out
2. Voter gets a RECEIPT!!!

Only persons willing to have a voice would jump at this......sorta like landowner rights from yrs back

3. Tribe gets $
4. People get who they want to control their lives. Everyone happy.

Vilfredo Pareto's picture

The poll tax was a good idea.  In my area if you didn't want to pay the poll tax you could work a few days under my great grandpappy's road crew each year and earn your right to vote.

 

True fact.  They used to have mules pull those big roller thingies.  

afronaut's picture

White males that aren't in jail, paid taxes in the previous year, and have children. Things would be much different if that were the case. Sorta like what would have happened if we lost WW2. 

Vilfredo Pareto's picture

Naah.  Just the propertied classes of any race or gender.

 

Alexander Hamilton was right.  If you allow those without property to vote they will just vote to take your property.

Pernicious Gold Phallusy's picture

Their own property, not joint marital assets.

DeaconPews's picture

Nothing Burger, there's no such thing as voter fraud. Democrats and MSM told me so.

Librarian's picture

Russia! Russia! Russia!

..would also have been accepted.

northern vigor's picture

Need to start doing elections like in third world countries...dipping their index finger in ink to know who voted and who didn't. 

didthatreallyhappen's picture

further confirmation that.........

 

LIBERALS ARE FUCKING PIECES OF SHIT