Google Fires Author Of "Outrageous" Memo Slamming Company's Anti-Conservative Culture

Tyler Durden's picture

Yesterday we reported that a 10-page document penned by an unnamed Google engineer titled "Google's Ideological Echo Chamber" which criticized the company's "left-leaning", "anti-conservative" culture and called for replacing Google's diversity initiatives with policies that encourage "ideological diversity" instead, led to angry outrage among fellow Google employees and Silicon Valley liberals. The document, published in its entirety by Gizmodo, quickly went "viral" both inside the company and within the broader Silicon Valley community. 

The document's author also wrote that employees with conservative political beliefs are discriminated against at Google and lamented about how "leftist" ideology is harmful. It argued that the company should have a more "open" culture where its viewpoint would be welcomed. The document said that improving racial and gender diversity is less important than making sure conservatives feel comfortable expressing themselves at work.

And, as of moments ago, the author of the memo - whose name has since been revealed as James Damore - has been fired.

According to Bloomberg, "Google has fired an employee who wrote an internal memo blasting the web company’s diversity policies, creating a firestorm across Silicon Valley."

James Damore, the Google engineer who wrote the note, confirmed his dismissal in an email, saying that he had been fired for "perpetuating gender stereotypes." A Google representative didn’t immediately return a request for comment.

Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai sent a note to employees on Monday, first reported by ReCode, that said portions of the employee’s memo "violate our Code of Conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace." He did not, however, say at the time if the company was taking action against the employee.

As we explained yesterday, Damore’s 10-page memo accused Google of silencing conservative political opinions and argued that biological differences play a role in the shortage of women in tech and leadership positions.

It circulated widely inside the company and became public over the weekend, causing a furor that amplified the pressure on Google executives to take a more definitive stand.


After the controversy swelled, Danielle Brown, Google’s new vice president for diversity, integrity and governance, sent a statement to staff condemning Damore’s views and reaffirmed the company’s stance on diversity. In internal discussion boards, multiple employees said they supported firing the author, and some said they would not choose to work with him, according to postings viewed by Bloomberg News.

The memo and surrounding debate has come at an awkward time for Google which is currently fending off a lawsuit from the U.S. Department of Labor alleging the company systemically discriminates against women. Google has denied the charges, arguing that it doesn’t have a gender gap in pay, but has declined to share full salary information with the government. According to the company’s most recent demographic report, 69 percent of its workforce and 80 percent of its technical staff are male.

And speaking of hypocrisy, in the same memo from CEO Pichai, we read the the following:

... let me say that we strongly support the right of Googlers to express themselves, and much of what was in that memo is fair to debate, regardless of whether a vast majority of Googlers disagree with it.


... So to be clear again, many points raised in the memo — such as the portions criticizing Google’s trainings, questioning the role of ideology in the workplace, and debating whether programs for women and underserved groups are sufficiently open to all — are important topics. The author had a right to express their views on those topics — we encourage an environment in which people can do this and it remains our policy to not take action against anyone for prompting these discussions.


... there are co-workers who are questioning whether they can safely express their views in the workplace (especially those with a minority viewpoint). They too feel under threat, and that is also not OK. People must feel free to express dissent.

... and to be fired immediately after, especially if the "dissent" puts into question some of Google's more fundamental ideological tenets, such as those highlighted by Wikileaks which last year revealed "Google's "Strategic Plan" To Help Democrats Win The Election, Track Voters."

As for the now former Senior Software Engineer and Harvard PhD, we are confident that a job at Palantir awaits with open arms.

His full memo is below (link):

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
MillionDollarButter's picture

Alright. We going to build a search engine or what?  I know proprietary search engine technology that is now public domain.  I'd reveal it, but it would dox me.  Google is an inefficient dictionary based search engine.  For a new search engine, we are talking $50,000,000 in hardware, $20,000,000/year in maintenance costs.  This not only grants the necessary freedom of expression that this country needs, but also, it provides new potential monitoring of media websites, that would allow "narrative" to be quickly identified.  I am serious, and I am capable.

peddling-fiction's picture

Tip for sillyCON valley employees that want to get fired:

Criticize your liberal bosses publicly.

Hope it starts trending.

MillionDollarButter's picture

I can do an ad revenue system.  I have worked on the best of these.  I can also do efficient media streaming.

Zer0head's picture

Brin, you evil fucking Russian Moscow born bastard and your Wookie wife too

(why is it no one talks about your Russain fucking upbringing?)

NidStyles's picture

Getting fired from Google for being White and willing to speak openly about structural racism....

Lawsuit waiting to happen.

Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Hopefully his stock options and company matching contributions to his 401(k) already vested.

I think Google fully understands a lawsuit is coming their way and they decided to fire the guy now while the rabble was roused and deal with the fallout later.

Gotta keep the hired guns happy or they might just turn on you.

Manthong's picture


It might be that GooG executives and managers that identify with genders opposite to their appendages or biological indentations are so confused as to not understand that diversity does not mean conformity.

wrap your noggin around that circular reference.


Overfed's picture

I'd give damn near anything to see every white male at Google quit on the same day.

sickavme's picture

Ahh, yes...


The tolerant left strikes again...



Manthong's picture


how many new H1-B openings would that produce?

Dormouse's picture

Aside from throwing a ball like a bitch, Larry Page gives a "dead-fish" handshake and talks like a faggot.

jeff montanye's picture

the fired engineer should have concentrated on the obvious bias in google search results.  try "most dangerous black organizations" and "most dangerous white organizations".  

pretty telling.  

and when is the google going to start understanding the meaning of sentences and grow up beyond linking words together in nonsensical ways, with a million examples in half a second.

how about using some of those language translation skills that deep blue had to develop to win jeopardy and give fifty useful answers in five seconds.

i can wait.

EddieLomax's picture

I just did a few searches, white organisation brings up the republican party, but more interesting is typing <name> is like Hillary Clinton is.

Almost every search has dead, a cat and other weird terms, does anyone seach to check if someone famous is dead or a cat?  It looks like someone has clearly tampered with the auto learning algorithm to suggest only inane and useless auto completes.  But then I see everything comes back with nonsense, even a search for "adolf hitler is" comes back with jibberish, "pol pot is" is even more random.  Its the same story on bing.

The problem with this sort of tampering is that they're deliberately breaking things in order to be politically correct, eventually some competitor will appear and Google/Microsoft will find their business gone.

jbvtme's picture

what are options to google search engine?

moonshadow's picture

Startpage is great BUT they are 'enhanced by google'

Herd Redirection Committee's picture

There was an outcry on conservative sites a few weeks ago when someone posted that people should do a Google image search for 'medieval european history'.    The results were... uhhhh... Very diverse.

tenpanhandle's picture

I just tried Jeff Montanye's suggestion and after coming up with search results remembered that I no longer run corrupt, dishonest, lying, cheating google and therefore got results from a "duck duck go" search.

exsanguine's picture

I have been using Bing for years now. They offer reward points for using it and  you can use them for cash cards, swepstakes entriess and the like.


Google sucks balls.


SubjectivObject's picture

breakng things in order to blur real history


Promethus's picture

Spoiler alert. It's the Republician party and the Republician party.

I hope somebody invents a better search engine than Google and he doesn't even gave to be a white male.

HalinCA's picture

Because he is one ... is that news to anyone here?

fiatmasochist's picture

Too diverse for diversity.

VinceFostersGhost's picture



Too big to care about diversity.

zuuuueri's picture

fucking hell, to think i worked at that company for 6 years.
well, they hadnt gone full retard back then (but you could see it was heading in that direction).
It'd almost be worth going back just to quit again in protest.

The Cooler King's picture

In my country there is problem, And that problem is SEARCH.


Throw the SEARCH down the well.

Manthong's picture

They dropped that tag a while ago after they went full-tilt evil.

pitz's picture

Always were evil.  From the moment that the first H-1B arrived at Ampitheatre Parkway when Americans were lining up 1000 deep for Google jobs.

A L I E N's picture

I have one word for you (or three)



Keyser's picture

I've been using DuckDuckGo for a long time as I refuse to feed the beast... And how tolerant of google to fire this guy for voicing his concerns about the cuck(old) culture at google... Should tell you all you need to know... 

EddieLomax's picture

Interesting, try using google/bing for a search "hillary clinton is" and the suggestions are gibberish.  Duckduckgo actually gives back some relevant searches.

IntTheLight's picture

The CEO is Indian. What do you expect?

tenpanhandle's picture

Send in the cowboys.  Is that intolerant?

KrugerrandFan's picture

Same as that Alien.  Good search and no cruft.

BarkingCat's picture

They were always evil.

I realize that years ago when Google decided to digitally scan every book in the world completely disregarding copyrights.

I really wish there was an alternative to Android and iShit.

Where is that blasted Linux for mobiles??


jaxville's picture

  I wonder how their brethren would take it if google copied every movie made....especially the ones in the theaters?

woody188's picture

I think they call that "YouTube"

Amicus Curiae's picture

until..why not go blackberry?

El Vaquero's picture

Android is Linux based.  What you want is for somebody to branch it. 

SafelyGraze's picture

he was at harvard? princeton? MIT? illinois?

what in the world were they thinking by admitting a conservative at such good schools as that???


they should have, like, a check-box so that applicants can self-identify as a conservative or not.

that way they can avoid this kind of thing in the future.

memo to universities: screen for conservatives. do it up front. do it early. keep them out.

that will fix the problem.

aldous huxley