"A Volatile Autumn": Buckled Up For Structured Criticality

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Gary Evans of Global Macro Monitor

We’re baaaccck!.

We warned in our last post before leaving on holiday, “Look for some large sigma event, which is always the case when we are off the desk.”    How about a vol spike caused by worries over a nuclear exchange?   Nuclear war!

The potential implosion of a presidency?

We think yesterday’s presidential presser has a relatively high probability of being a (or the)  structured criticality event that we could look back to as the tipping point that leads to a very volatile autumn. 

Structured criticality is a property of complex systems in which small events may trigger larger events due to subtle interdependencies between elements. This often gives rise to a form of stratified chaos where the general behavior of the system can be modeled on one scale while smaller- and larger-scale behaviors remain unpredictable.


For example:


Consider a pile of sand. If you drop one grain of sand on top of this pile every second, the pile will continue to grow in the shape of a cone. The general shape, size, and growth of this cone is fairly easy to model as a function of the rate at which new sand grains are added, the size and shape of the grains, and the number of grains in the pile.


The pile retains its shape because occasionally a new grain of sand will trigger an avalanche which causes some number of grains to slide down the side of the cone into new positions.


These avalanches are chaotic. It is nearly impossible to predict if the next grain of sand will cause an avalanche, where that avalanche will occur on the pile, how many grains of sand will be involved in the event, and so on.  – Wikipedia

We love applying the conceptual framework of physics and dynamic systems models to economics and the markets, but think the obssession with the math has perverted the analysis and will someday lead to a doozy of a market meltdown when the algos collide and short circuit on a day to be named later.

In the hypothetical worlds of rational markets, where much of economic theory is set, perhaps. But real-world history tells a different story, of mathematical models masquerading as science and a public eager to buy them, mistaking elegant equations for empirical accuracy.


As an extreme example, take the extraordinary success of Evangeline Adams, a turn-of-the-20th-century astrologer whose clients included the president of Prudential Insurance, two presidents of the New York Stock Exchange, the steel magnate Charles M Schwab, and the banker J P Morgan. To understand why titans of finance would consult Adams about the market, it is essential to recall that astrology used to be a technical discipline, requiring reams of astronomical data and mastery of specialised mathematical formulas. ‘An astrologer’ is, in fact, the Oxford English Dictionary’s second definition of ‘mathematician’. For centuries, mapping stars was the job of mathematicians, a job motivated and funded by the widespread belief that star-maps were good guides to earthly affairs. The best astrology required the best astronomy, and the best astronomy was done by mathematicians – exactly the kind of person whose authority might appeal to bankers and financiers.  – Aeon

Hat Tip:  Jose Cerritelli

We have have repeatedly warned our readers of potential political instability and to watch “the American street.”  See here and here.

Our sense is we are headed for some heated political instability in the United States.

How will it affect the markets? 

Depends on trajectory of events,  but unless inflation or interest rates spike providing competition for risk assets,  don’t expect a bear market to start tomorrow.     We have always lived our financial career by Bagehot’s dictum:

“John Bull can stand many things, but he cannot stand  2.0 , [-1.5 or 1.25]  percent”  – Bagehot

We still maintain yield and return chasers will not retreat to their caves,  with,  the exception of short-term bouts, such as last week, unless policy rates  move up another 100-200 basis points and the monetary bases in the G3 shrink by double digit percentage points though quantitative tightening (QT).  That is how much liquidity (potential buying firepower) is still in the global system,  in our opinion, folks.

What we are looking for?

We still have high conviction the risk markets will experience a swift, short, and steep sell-off in October –  5 to 10 percent – based on:

1) seasonality; 2) the Fed balance sheet should, or could be shrinking ; 3) China’s Party Congress may have concluded, removing the country’s implicit policy put, and thus increasing the risk of a China policy or economic shock; 4) the new U.S. Federal government fiscal year begins October 1 and if the Trump administration has not passed any significant economic legislation, the markets may begin to throw in the towel; 5) there will be more clarity on ECB tapering; 6) even more elevated asset prices as the risk markets grind higher through the rest of summer as we suspect, setting up for a potential blow-off by the end of September; 7) nervousness over the debt ceiling; and, finally, 8) by then, the markets should be sufficiently overbought, overvalued and very vulnerable to event risk.  – GMM

Add to that possible key White House resignations.

What do you think the markets will do if Gary Cohn resigns?

That’s at least worth a 5 percent haircut off the S&P500, in our opinion,  and a spike to 20 in the VIX,  triggering another round of structured criticality.

The exodus of executives sparked talk that Gary Cohn, Trump’s top White House economic adviser and a key liaison to the U.S. business community, might resign in protest as well.

Cohn, who is Jewish, was upset by Trump’s remarks, though he is remaining with the administration for now, sources said.  – Reuters,  August 16, 2017

Cohn may also come to the conclusion that after the August Congressional recess he is wasting his time as he perceives that the Trump administration has lost all credibility on Capitol Hill and none of his policies has any chance of  being implemented.   If rumors begin to spread in mid-September,  market will begin to wobble, bigly.

If Chief of Staff,  John Kelly,  goes?  Get shorty,  big time.

The 1987 Analog

Since we know crash talk is surely coming, we’ve put together a two-year trading analog of the S&P500 from end of December 1985/2015 to December 1987 and August 16, 2017.

First,  over the 20-month trading period, the 1987 S&P500 outperformed the current 2017 S&P500 by over 31 percent as of today’s close.  Not much of an analog.

Second, the yield on the 2-year increased 287 bps (45 percent) from the beginning of 1987 to the eve of the crash with the 10-year up 252 (33 percent), peaking over 10 percent.   The 2-year is up only 13 bps (11 percent) this year with the 10-year down 22 bps (-9 percent).

Third,  the 1987 S&P500 peaked on August 25th and banged around until October 5th, where it was only down 2.6 percent from the peak.   It then fell 13.6 percent from October 5th to Friday,  October 16, the trading eve of the crash.  On Black Monday,  October 19, 1987,  the S&P500 closed down 20.47 percent, almost double the 1929 crash.

Similarly, the 1929 stock market peaked on September 3, 1929 and fell sharply to close down 32 percent on the eve of Black Tuesday,  October 29, 1929.  That crash sliced 11.7 percent off Dow Jones Industrial in one day.   In both cases, 1929 and 1987 the markets sent a loud signal and warning of an imminent crash as,  a matter of fact,  the markets were crashing before the big crash.

The major difference of the two markets is the Dow didn’t regain the September 3, 1929 peak until November 23, 1954, more than 25 years later.  The 1987 S&P500 reclaimed its August 25, 1987 high on July 26, 1989, less than two years.   Compliments of easy monetary policy and the circumvention of a great depression.


It’s probably time to buckle up.   We expect volatility to begin to pick up;  for the markets to start banging around until October;  then experience a Tower of Terror sell-off sometime in October.

Though the sell-off may be the day the algos go rogue, there is no doubt, the full firepower of the PPT and the Fed will be put to work.   Can they beat this new technology gone wild?

Gotta be quick on the draw as it could be over in the blink of an eye.

Could be wrong. fter all, isn’t this astrology, folks?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
GoldHermit's picture

How about fewer governing more?  The concentration of power will be one of the main tipping points in my opinion - politicians, bankers, elite.  These areas ALL need major restructuring.

Vlad the Inhaler's picture

This trend has been going on for decades (fall of Soviet Union etc) and will continue as people realize that centralized power serves them poorly.

Honey-Badger's picture

Wow another 'You Are Here' chart....this shitshow will continue until it benefits them no more. Markets are completely rigged so charts are pretty much redundant.

VD's picture

a "correction" to 2300 on an index that needs to be 666 or therabouts is not even a blip.

mike_king's picture

I won't be happy until the EBT cards run out and there is starvation and rioting in the streets. The US needs a cleansing civil war.

GunnerySgtHartman's picture

Cohn is worth 5% of the S&P?  Man, talk about "full faith & credit" BS.

Haus-Targaryen's picture

I respectfully disagree.  

Those that run the show have been at the helm 24 hours a day, 7 days a week since sometime in 2012.  They cannot allow the markets to function as markets, else this ponzi-scheme comes to an end.  

We might get a flash-crash down, but mark my words here and now, a 800 point drop in the DOW will result in an 805 point rally 20 minutes laters. You'll finish green for the day.  CNBC will talk about a fat finger for a day or two and then the event will have passed.

This continues until a currency somewhere gives out or some unforeseen event blows up in the market-maker's faces. 

Racer's picture

It won't take twenty minutes, more like twenty nanoseconds!

bunkers's picture

STOCK UP and bulk up your security..

Bill of Rights's picture

Ill just leave this right here




Should be many snowflake tears after watching this...Someone needs to Tweet this to Trump...

Hkan's picture

Comfortable watching the show....let it begin....

Solio's picture

Piggy-backed technology/software to deal with the structured rhythm of the mockits. It flows like a river, like a leaf in the breeze, like day following night allz well in OZ.

Iskiab's picture

Crashes are difficult to predict but the timing on this one might be a bit early. Couple of things worth mentioning:
- Main Street uses recessions and crashes for write downs. The longer the boom the more crap in their books, I'd expect lots of hidden losses to be exposed once there's a way for executives to blame external forces for their blunders
- global GDP isn't doing so hot, mainly due to demographics.
- the combination of the two I believe means you'll see a struggle to regain the previous peak
- black box algos have no fear or greed, historically a crash presents an opportunity but algos might see the downward trend and keep selling, I'd watch out for a dead cat bounce
- less institutional investment combined with buy backs means where will the support come from when companies stop buying

What I'm getting at is timing is hard, but I wouldn't use a previous chart to predict how the crash will play out. Volatility will be high as the indexes rebalance, and how will the algos react when they see the volatility?

Storm-Clouds's picture

The "Black Boxes" are algorithms specifically programmed with executable bias. Who changes the bias? When is the question?

The dead don't care.....

Bam_Man's picture

"It's hard to make predictions. Especially about the future."

   - Yogi Berra

kavabanga's picture

Here is simply what I think the S&P will do in the next two decades. What goes up must come down. Despite political turmoil in the United States, which country is better prepared with a more developed, regulated, and with a perceived "safe" and open financial market, than the U.S.? RSI , Stoch , and MACD all indicate the potential for a strong sell-off. But what do you think? Can wealth be created and destroyed, or only transferred? Are the laws of supply and demand an ultimate truth or is it possible to manipulate a market by creating false demand? Post your thoughts in the comments below! Happy Hunting Everyone.


Iskiab's picture

There are few things that are certain in the world; death, taxes and long term economic growth if the populations keeps increasing. To bet against a rising stock market in the long run is a suckers bet.

The predicted crash is about long term assumptions about continuing profitability of companies. P/E ratio can be taken as the amount of years this profitability is expected to continue, discounted to present.

What the debate is about is the future health of the system; where companies have inflated earnings for a short term price increase that isn't sustainable, pricing in earnings that aren't realistic, and market manipulation. At the end of the day all that matters is earnings so interference will always one day result in a correction.

LawsofPhysics's picture

BULLSHIT.  This is NOT 1987, not by a long shot you stupid fuck.

Rebelrebel7's picture

I have to laugh at the bankers and CEOs attempts at trying to blame Trump, who has never been a part of the DC establishment,  for the ensuing calamity whicvh we are about to experience, which the bankers and CEOs are 100% responsible for! 

We wouldn't even be in this situation if we had  never listened to any of them in the first place, and now they have deluded themselves into believing that they will not be held accountable for their failed  policies in the public eye! 

The arrogance is truly remarkable!

Oh, and the punchline is that they have the answer to the problem!