Two New Totalitarian Movements: Radical Islam And Political Correctness

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by A.Z.Mohamed via The Gatestone Institute,

  • The attempt in the West to impose a strict set of rules about what one is allowed to think and express in academia and in the media -- to the point that anyone who disobeys is discredited, demonized, intimidated and in danger of losing his or her livelihood -- is just as toxic and just as reminiscent of Orwell's diseased society.
  • The main facet of this PC tyranny, so perfectly predicted by George Orwell, is the inversion of good and evil -- of victim and victimizer. In such a universe, radical Muslims are victimized by the West, and not the other way around. This has led to a slanted teaching of the history of Islam and its conquests, both as a justification of the distortion and as a reflection of it.
  • Thought-control is necessary for the repression of populations ruled by despotic regimes. That it is proudly and openly being used by self-described liberals and human-rights advocates in free societies is not only hypocritical and shocking; it is a form of aiding and abetting regimes whose ultimate goal is to eradicate Western ideals.

Political correctness (PC) has been bolstering radical Islamism. This influence was most recently shown again in an extensive exposé by the Clarion Project in July 2017, which demonstrates the practice of telling "deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them in order to forget any fact that has become inconvenient" -- or, as George Orwell called it in his novel, 1984, "Doublespeak."

This courtship and marriage between the Western chattering classes and radical Muslim fanatics was elaborated by Andrew C. McCarthy in his crucial 2010 book, The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America.

Since then, this union has strengthened. Both the United States and the rest of the West are engaged in a romance with forces that are, bluntly, antagonistic to the values of liberty and human rights.

To understand this seeming paradox, one needs to understand what radical Islamism and PC have in common. Although Islamism represents all that PC ostensibly opposes -- such as the curbing of free speech, the repression of women, gays and "apostates" -- both have become totalitarian ideologies.

The totalitarian nature of radical Islamism is more obvious than that of Western political correctness -- and certainly more deadly. Sunni terrorists, such as ISIS and Hamas -- and Shiites, such as Hezbollah and its state sponsor, Iran -- use mass murder to accomplish their ultimate goal of an Islamic Caliphate that dominates the world and subjugates non-Muslims.

The attempt in the West, however, to impose a strict set of rules about what one is allowed to think and express in academia and in the media -- to the point that anyone who disobeys is discredited, demonized, intimidated and in danger of losing his or her livelihood -- is just as toxic and just as reminiscent of Orwell's view of a diseased society.

These rules are not merely unspoken ones. Quoting a Fox News interview with American columnist Rachel Alexander, the Clarion Project points out that the Associated Press -- whose stylebook is used as a key reference by a majority of English-language newspapers worldwide for uniformity of grammar, punctuation and spelling -- is now directing writers to avoid certain words and terms that are now deemed unacceptable to putative liberals.

Alexander recently wrote:

"Even when individual authors do not adhere to the bias of AP Style, it often doesn't matter. If they submit an article to a mainstream media outlet, they will likely see their words edited to conform. A pro-life author who submits a piece taking a position against abortion will see the words 'pro-life' changed to 'anti-abortion,' because the AP Stylebook instructs, 'Use anti-abortion instead of pro-life and pro-abortion rights instead of pro-abortion or pro-choice.' It goes on, 'Avoid abortionist,' saying the term 'connotes a person who performs clandestine abortions.'

 

"Words related to terrorism are sanitized in the AP Stylebook. Militant, lone wolves or attackers are to be used instead of terrorist or Islamist. 'People struggling to enter Europe' is favored over 'migrant' or 'refugee.' While it's true that many struggle to enter Europe, it is accurate to point out that they are, in fact, immigrants or refugees."

To be sure, the AP Stylebook does not carry the same weight or authority as the Quranic texts on which radical Islamists base their jihadist actions and totalitarian aims. It does constitute, however, a cultural decree that has turned religious in its fervor. It gives a glimpse, as well, into the intellectual tyranny that has pervaded liberal Western thought and institutions.

The main facet of this PC tyranny, so perfectly predicted by Orwell, is the inversion of good and evil -- of victim and victimizer. In such a universe, radical Muslims are victimized by the West, and not the other way around. This has led to a slanted teaching of the history of Islam and its conquests, both as a justification of the distortion and as a reflection of it.

As far back as 2003, the Middle East Forum reported on the findings of a study conducted by the American Textbook Council, an independent New York-based research organization, which stated:

"[Over the last decade], the coverage of Islam in world history textbooks has expanded and in some respects improved.... But on significant Islam-related subjects, textbooks omit, flatter, embellish, and resort to happy talk, suspending criticism or harsh judgments that would raise provocative or even alarming questions."

Thought-control is necessary for the repression of populations ruled by despotic regimes. That it is proudly and openly being used by self-described liberals and human-rights advocates in free societies is not only hypocritical and shocking; it is a form of aiding and abetting regimes whose ultimate goal is to eradicate Western ideals. The relationship between the two must be recognized for what it is: a marriage made in hell.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
HRH Feant2's picture

Matt Bracken wrote about this in 2016: http://gatesofvienna.net/2015/11/tet-take-two-islams-2016-european-offen...

A quote from the above linked essay: "Tet, Take Two:
Islam’s 2016 European Offensive

By Matthew Bracken, November 2015

More than a decade ago I wrote my first novel, Enemies Foreign and Domestic. Part of my motivation was to establish my bona fides at forecasting social, political and military trends. I didn’t like the direction America was heading, and I wanted to warn as many readers as possible about some of the dangers I saw coming. At the end of 2015, I hope that my past success at prognostication will encourage people to pay heed to this essay.

As we roll into the New Year, we are witnessing the prelude to the culmination of a titanic struggle between three great actors. Three great social forces are now set in motion for a 2016 showdown and collision that will, in historical terms, be on par with the First and Second World Wars."

Bracken wrote about the merging of the far left and the Islamists long before anyone else had registered this as an issue on their radar. If you are not familiar with his essays, read them, they are free at: www.enemiesforeignanddomestic.com

If you want to spend some money, all of his books have been fast-paced and a realistic introduction to the new world to come. Bought his latest book, "The Red Cliffs of Zerhoun," and I reached the end too fast.

Shemp 4 Victory's picture

The ward nurse at Gatestoned Asylum must be withholding medications from the patient A. Z. Mohamed.

Two New Totalitarian Movements

New? This screed written on a new 386 PC with just released latest version of WordPerfect for MS-DOS? Either that or the patient is afflicted with some anachronic disorder causing confusion about the direction and flow of time.

quadraspleen's picture

He works for the ZioStone bullshitting fear-mongers. Close.

He forgot radical Talmudic Judaism though. B-

pluto the dog's picture

give us a break quadqueen both leftism and islam were created by the chosenites!

EEEEEEEEEEE's picture

zh is banning people for saying the word nigger

 

potentially i will be banned from zero hedge and my comment gets deleted becasue zero hedge is strongly censoring its commentary

 

 

LET ME HELP YOU TWAT HEDGE TO FIX YOUR POLITICAL CORRECTNESS: NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

SMC's picture

I was recently called a WIGGER for pushing back against Alt-Left idiocy.

So let's not forget WIGGER! ROFL. I am actually kind of proud to be called that by a red faced, foaming at the mouth, teary eyed allegedly graduate level moron.

Working class white trash... Yep. That is me. :-)

"Sticks and stones may break my bones but names can never hurt me" (Unless one was raised as a fragile pathetic snowflake.... ) LOL.

jimmy12345's picture

Christianity and Islam are ridiculously dumb, but the Enlightenment movement in the West lessened the power of Christianity.  Trump voters scored highest in authoritarianism, so the Alt-Right movement is inherently anti-liberty.  Muslims are only 1% of the USA population and they are the second best educated ethnic group next to the Jews in the USA, so Islam is no threat to USA political system.  Trump, on the other hand, is seeking to destroy the separation of powers and the Alt-Right would be happy if her were a dictator.

Cloud9.5's picture

Jim, it’s fascinating as to how you manage to throw out your word bombs without any supporting evidence and some idiots just nod in approval.  You lump Christianity and Islam into the same category and rate them both as being ridiculously dumb. You equate walk the second mile, turn the other cheek and pray for those who despitefully use you with the sanctioned slaughter and enslavement of the nonbeliever.  Then of course there is the crème de crème with the Islamic sanctioned rape of the nonbelievers’ wives and daughters.  I don’t recall Christ sanctioning the rape of anyone.

The fact that you see these two belief systems as identically stupid is revealing.   I would much rather have a stupid neighbor who would pester me with prayer and pamphlet’s than one who magically wake up one morning and decide that I must convert to his dumb belief system or die. Then again I suppose the image of Armenian girls on crosses lining the horizon is so picturesque.

Then you make the assertion that Trump supporters scored highest on authoritarianism.  Where did they score? By whose measure did they score?  You have lumped me into this group and labeled me as authoritarian and you don’t even know me. Let me fill you in as to why I voted for Trump.   First and foremost, I voted for Trump because he supported my right to remain armed.  Bill and Hillary had come down on this issue with their assault weapon ban many years ago.  Based on their actions, it was clear to me that they were covert gun abolitionists.  Secondly, I voted for Trump because I hoped that he would reign in the empire and stop the never ending wars that have dominated this country for the last hundred years.  Finally I voted for Trump in the hopes that he would reinstate the rule of law, and issues like Fast and Furious and Benghazi and the turning over of state secrets to a handful of Pakistanis would be dealt with.

Now let’s deal with your assertion that I am authoritarian.  I’m an introvert.  I do not wish to force anyone to believe as I do.  I simply want to be left alone.  I do not have a list of terms that cannot be spoken in public.  You can call me anything you wish.  I don’t care.  The only safe place I insist on is my home. 

What I see on the left is a great deal of projection of yourselves on us deplorables.  For the most part, I don’t give a diddly damn what you guys think or revere.  If you want to rent a cow pasture and let the far left and the far right kill each other.  Go for it.  Let the buzzards clean up the mess.  Just leave me alone and we are good.  If you see that as an authoritarian mindset, then we live in two different realities and polite conversation is impossible.

 

 

striped-pad's picture

+1

I voted for Trump because I hoped that he would reign in the empire

Unfortunate misspelling.

Cloud9.5's picture

Freudian perhaps or it could be my dyslexia. Either way, I stand corrected. 

Gohigher's picture

Damn, just when I was about to stop reading ZH this week.
I would greatly prefer to just hang out with all those liberty minded individuals who just yearn to be left alone to live as they choose and accept others that wish whatever- unless they tread beyond the limit of their individual spheres onto others. I see a million deplorables evenly spaced out in that great field all quietly looking at each other wordless, speechless. Then, the icebreaker : "Um, I bought a new reloader. Wanna' come over to our place and take a look" ?

Anyway, I take heart that multitudes are there, critical in thought, liberally educated and deplorable as hell.I rarely ever look back to comments, but thanks for the uplift for the day.

Reichstag Fire Dept.'s picture

Who the FUCK do you think you are trying to convince here in ZH?

...move along, move along...

Muslimania's picture

I LEARNED EVERYTHING I NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ISLAM ON 9/11. (lock and load) MOLON LABE, SUCKERS.

drendebe10's picture

Progressive liberal democraps are the meanest nastiest hypocrite intolerant divisive turds on the face of the earth Fukemall

Rebelrebel7's picture

Congress and recent presidents completely destroyed western values ! Maybe because of the Petro dollar, globalist policies, and Federal Reserve Act of 1913!

Both parties are without a doubt globalists! Both parties support globalist trade policies, globalist wars, and globalist forms of governmernt! 

Both parties are corporate fascists just like Mussolini! Both parties have completely destroyed the Bill of Rights! There is literally nothing left worth fighting for on either side!

Both parties also support the Federal Reserve.  The bankers manifesto of 1892 deliberately wanted to leave voters choosing between candidates with matters of little significance to the bankers. The bankers concluded that slavery was too costly because of transporting, feeding, and housing them. They Thought that they would simply resort to debt enslavement.

Unite the sane and independent center! Commit to not choosing sides in the neoconservative / neoliberal civil war !
Don't take it to the streets! Take it to the internet! Legislation has never been changed as a result of people protesting with signs!
Let the pen and the truth be your deadliest weapons against the corrupt, war-mongering, psychopathic establishment!

Don't be a useful idiot that elevates the establishment's two party system!

Both parties have destroyed the Bill of Rights and both parties are war mongering treasonous tyrrants!

This strategy could destroy the two parties which have  destroyed America!

Americans should unite around issues that we can all agree upon. These issues are all ignored by the establishment elites of the neocons and neoliberals.

1.We must repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and abolish the Federal Reserve. Congress must resume its responsibility and coin money and regulate its value as granted to Congress in Article 1 Section 8 Clause 5 of the constitution.

There would be no need for income, estate, capital gains,  or corporate taxes, and no need to reduce spending! The government could create the money required to fund it debt free! If we pay off the national debt,  we destroy the money supply and the economy, since the money supply is based on government debt! During the middle ages in England, when the banks did not issue currency and England used the tally system, the average man provided everything necessary for his family by working 16 weeks a year! The rest of the time was spent learning, traveling,  on the arts, and volunteering for the church! 
For more on this topic please read The Web of Debt and the Shocking Truth About Our Money System And How We Can Break Free by Ellen Hodgson Brown J.D.

2.The military should be used for defending our borders. We should close the 698 permanent foreign military bases and 400 temporary military bases. Our international meddling is jeopardizing national and international security, human life, and economic prosperity. We should retract from all war on foreign soil.

3. The prison industrial complex and the war on drugs must end. It is a horrific human rights abuse and is completely unacceptable.

4. All laws which violate the Bill of Rights must be immediately repealed. The NDAA, The Patriot Act, HR6393, The American Freedom Act are all grotesque unconstitutional violations of the 4th amendment.  

5. Freedom of speech and of the press , and  the right to assemble, must be protected. 

The government has removed the common thread that wove the fabric of our nation, our liberty, in a futile attempt to take the heat off of them, where it rightfully belongs, and to incite civil war, leaving corruption as usual in charge!

Blue Steel 309's picture

Without social controls (not governmental, but from your community), Whites are given to individualism that leans towards avarice. There are those who have exploited that weakness.

Knowledge is power

pluto the dog's picture

the points you raise might work in a country that isnt a multiculture - but there are no western countries that arent multi-cultures any more and in most western countries whites are very quickly heading toward minority status. whose gonna safeguard the interests of white people let alone bring about the kinds of change youre looking for - its not gonna happen.

Gohigher's picture

You lost me at #1. The part about Congress doing its main job representing the interests of the people. LOL and

rolling on the floor sick of the circus.

RE-ELECT NOBODY
FUCK THE WAR PIGS

Captain Chlamydia's picture

That moment when The Dude realizes the only reason Lebowski would have hired him was if Lebowski didn’t want an answer.

The Dude: “No, I’m saying, if he knows I’m a fuck-up, why does he leave me in charge of getting his wife back? Because he doesn’t fucking want her back! He no longer digs her, it’s all a show!”

When you realize that no matter how pleasing your newest insight, every knowledgeable person understands the situation better than you do, nobody went out of their way to explain the key points, might have even mis-directed attention, and that that fact in itself is a prior to something important.

Grandad Grumps's picture

Totalitarian False Movements.

Radicalization is both personal and temporary. Taking action to cause a radical response in others is a tactic. It is not a movement. Radical actions are created as a response to external stimuli, not inherent in the human being.

It seems that promoting political correctness to an extreme is just a tool designed to elicit a specific response, same as radicalization, and not really a movement.

CheapBastard's picture

I think that's why soros teaches his troops to throw bags of urine in order to elicit a response.

 

Then CNN and the left wing media only shows the response of the person/police hit with the urine/fees. They fail to show the initiator which is usually antifa or some Hillary supporter or BLM, all paid fpor by either DNC or soros funded group.

vato poco's picture

this ain't rocket science: they're control freak scum that need to be hammered, hard, on a regular basis. 

they'll keep coming back - like the cockroaches they are - so *never* EVER stop hammering them. 

or else you'll end up buried by the roaches

NobodyNowhere's picture

It is naive to say "radical Islam."  For Islam is radical.

There are Muslims who are not radical.

But there is no Islam that is not radical.

the cork's picture

You're splitting camel hairs.

Fuck 'em all, and we won't have to worry about it.

The_Central_Scrutinizer's picture

Agreed.  Islam is either practiced or not.  Traditional Islam is political islam is plain islam.  Look all the way back to the sayings, practices and actions of Muhammad.  His life is Sunnah and anecdotes about it are ahadith.  These are cannonical to the belief system.  What he said and did are no less 'radical' than what we see today.  In fact,  those 'radical' practitioners are the True Believers and are doing the 'holy hate' accorded to them by Sunnah, ahadith and the eternal and unchanging commands of Alllah.

 

This idea of political Islam or radical Islam is a Western gloss on what has been in force since the Medinah days of the Camel Raider Cult.

 

Don't take my word for it, read the ahadith and Quran. Online copies are available.

 

As for the other one, Political Correctness, it's only enforced under threat from Diversity Inc. coming out of both the Bar Association and Corporate America doing a CYA.  If people's jobs could not be threatened and 'Civil Rights' lawsuits weren't the force in fashion,  people and their true thoughts would not stand for all the kowtowing and bowing and scraping done towards this ideal of Equality of Outcome.

 

Should this money system crash and people are forced to produce real value, we will see an end to all this indulgence and virtue broadcasting.  Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs will shut all this stupidity down.

 

 

NuYawkFrankie's picture

Radical Islam And Political Correctness:

Both brought to you "courtesy" of the 'Usual Suspects'... in their accelerating, full-frontal "War On Whitey"

Freddie's picture

Radical Islam, PC and what is that one that starts with a Z?

The Chosun ones where those people created the Bolsheviks who murdered 25 million .Christian Russians?

 

Rocco May's picture

Communism is an ideology, a religion.

The Communists promise a better world but they install the Fascism.

Only the stupid people believe that they can create the "paradise".

They do not realize that they are brainwashed and instrumentalized by the communist sect.

The Antifa is an export of Europe, see also the Frankfurt School.

The communists have changed their names to socialists, national socialists, Marxists, leftists, neoliberals, globalists, but these are the same fascists- they always pursue the same target- the centralization and the dictatorship.

 Islam and the migrants are today their weapons,

formerly in Europe were the tanks. But perhaps the civil war comes…

no one knows what the communists (the politically correct) are planning.

 

Blue Steel 309's picture

Ah yeas more misdirection from the real enemy, which is Supremacist Judaism allied with Supremacist Zionism.

Rocco May's picture

not really- the matrix of all problems is the marxism and Karl Marx is Jewish.

We know that those who are chosen by God(Jewish faith) will rule the world.

divide et impera“ is their method

miketv's picture

Gatestone Jewhadists at it again.

 

Freddie's picture

Radical Islam?  Oh where the MSM screams about Iran and Hizbullah while Iran and Hizbullah are in Syria with the Russians helpings protect ALL Syrians including Syrian Christians?

Meanwhile - MIC, Deep State and the Pentagram have been in the middle east committing genocide against Christians and other innocent people for Larry Silverstein's 9-11?

Go to Google images and screach for Damascus Christmas and you will see .christmas lights everywhere.

Lebanese Christian singer singing praises for Hizbullah because they have defended Lebanon from invaders aka you know who the invaders are.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdZgkGI5h0A

Someone mentioned the only people defending Christians in the Middle East are the Orthodox Russians and Hizbullah.  I would also mention the Syrian military and also Iran are defending all Syrians.   The Shia muslims are defending middle east Christians more than our own demonic Deep State.   

ludwigvmises's picture

Jesus Christ, nobody .. really NOBODY cares about Islam. When I talk to my neighbours and friends, nobody ever mentions Islamism as a burning problem. Nobody cares about it. We care about jobs, jobs, jobs. That's what's pressing. Nobody cares about what some towelheads say or do half-way across the world.

BobEore's picture

Unusually wide awake crowd here today ... nice to see.

"Europeans" invaded and colonized the Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist and Sinitic regions of Asia, and used the vast profits reaped from impoverishing the peoples who lived there to develop their economies and social structure so as to become the wealthiest society on earth.

In each and every case, whether it was the Portuguese in India, Japan, or Brazil, the Spanish in Mexico and the Indies, the Dutch in Java, Ceylon and (also)the (west)Indies, the British, French or Italians, in north Africa, the middle east, and far eastern/western territories...

the pillage and pauperization were done at the direction of, and to the primary benefit of talmudists either covert or overt in their loyalties to racial supremacist religious cults, a caste of banker/financialist/mercantilists whose aim never strayed from monopolisation of profits and resources.

The crumbs left over from their orgies of opium, human trafficking, liquor and spice cartels were enough to leave their hapless goy assistants feeling wealthy and well served by the 'arrangement' in which brute force was put at the service of the latter so as to enforce the hegemony of the former.

Now their descendants are spilling tears and losing sleep as the descendants of the dispossessed of three continents crowd their shores with refugees from the man-made disasters created by western intelligence agencies in thrall to sionist manipulators. How very sad.

Where is Hans? Cue Hans! We need some sanctimonious outrage here to turn back the tide of disbelievers in the myth of western civilization - before its too late!

Rage n pontificate o merry men... Europes' time in the sun has come n gone, and the smart money is already far from the sewers that be left of its' short period of global ascendancy!

Cloud9.5's picture

Yours is a rather one sided check list of atrocities, but most everything you list is correct.  We can go back ten thousand years and find wars of conquest and enslavement on every continent.  Our ancestors have done some despicable deeds.  There is no question that we are the heirs of that past.  That much is granted.  So remember this: The past is but a memory.  The future is but a hope.  The present is what is.

So, if the descendent of a slave kicks your door in, beats the hell out of you, rapes your wife and daughters, and steals your stuff, it’s ok because you are somehow the benefactor of some ancestor’s past crimes.

If you take this position, you overlook one simple fact.  You and your assailant are here because your ancestors both won their contests for survival.  His ancestors, just like yours, crawled over the corpses of their past rivals so he could be here.

 

When he kicks your door in, you are once again thrown in the arena and the age old contest for survival begins again.  How it turns out in the best of circumstances is a matter of luck and pluck.  For you to ignore the wolf at your door handicaps you from the start.  Good luck.

Sun Rabbit's picture

Yes but all these things were done by WESTERN European nations. NONE of the Slavic countries of Europe including Russia had any colonies anywhere. That holds true for non-Slavic countries in eastern Europe as well, like Hungary, Greece, and Estonia. None of them had any colonies either.

the cork's picture

They don't want to be called towel heads.

Those are sheets.

gregga777's picture

Yes, jobs are a big issue. But, what about the rag heads that Obunghole and his Islamic minions admitted into the United States and their burning desire to impose Sharia totalitarianism here? They are taking jobs away from American citizens, driving down wages and creating terrorism here, too.

Sun Rabbit's picture

Because you obviously live in the US and not here in Europe. The US is complaining about getting 55,000 muslim refugess, well how do you think WE feel getting 2.6 million of them in the last 5 years into Germany alone, at a cost of 46 billion Euros per year to house feed, and PAY these people to connive against us.

No offence, but you just don't see the seriousness of the problem.

Kina's picture

Part of the answer is to take out the WaPo, NY Times, CNN, MSNBC, ABC by any means available.

gregga777's picture

"Here is a quote from the Los Angeles Times from Joel Stein, “I don’t care if Americans think we’re [Jews] running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we [Jews] get to keep running them.”"

http://thesaker.is/remembering-the-liberty/

lakecity55's picture

Don't buy their broadsheets or click on their websites is better. They get less revenue.

Of course, if they lose enough money, they'll hit up Congress for a "Restore American Press Act," giving them taxpayer funds. Then they will have come full circle and officially become .guv newz.

Sun Rabbit's picture

I think it would be more appropriately named the Restore American Press Equality Act, or RAPE Act for short.

gregga777's picture

Would there even be any Islamic terrorism, in Western nations, if in 1947 the United States had NOT led the United Nations to create the Crusader state of Apartheid Israel right in the middle of the Islamic world? Would there even be any refugees from Islamic nations? Hmmm?

* Would there have been the 1948, 1956, 1967 and 1973 Arab-Israeli wars?
* Would there have been any Arab oil embargoes?
* Would there have been any wars in Lebanon?
* Would the USS Liberty have been deliberately attacked by Israel on June 8, 1967 with 34 US sailors KIA and 171 wounded;
* Would there even be such organizations as the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization), Black September, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, ISIS and many, many others?
* Would Iran allegedly even be motivated to develop nuclear weapons if it were not for the 100-400 nuclear weapons developed by Israel from fissile materials provided from the US Savannah River nuclear facility?
* Would the US be bogged down in unwinnable wars, for the glory of Greater Apartheid Israel, in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, etc., with tens of thousands of killed and wounded, millions of dead civilians, $ trillions wasted because the Israeli people don't want their own people killed?
* Would Europe be overrun with millions of Muslims seeking asylum outside their war ravaged countries?

To date, Israel has been the beneficiary of approximately $125 billion (not adjusted for inflation) in U.S. foreign aid, an unimaginable sum, more than any other country since WW II, and which is slated to further increase to some $165 billion (also unadjusted for inflation) by the end of the new ten-year aid package in 2029.

U.S. aid constitutes some 3 percent of Israel's total state budget and about 1 percent of its GDP. U.S. aid constitutes some 20 percent of the total defense budget, 40 percent of the IDF budget, and almost the entire procurement budget.

When the American People as a whole turn against Apartheid Israel it isn't going to be pretty.

Dealyer Turdin's picture

I'm just guessing but it seems like Senator D "OG" Feinstein has, with her husband, prolly snaked 20 billion or so for herself, by herself, and she's Carlyle Group octopus tentacles...

Richard Blum, hubby, head of UC board of Regents, giant no-bid contracts, land grabs, and university DOD contracts, has anyone ever figured out how much loot these two have carried off?

125 billion is just the skin on the Several National Associations of Kindred Entrepeneurs.

DoctOZ's picture

Americans have brought thisupon them selves.  They will have to get rid of it now. 

quasi_verbatim's picture

Quite frankly, no-one cares what denizens of academia and the media are permitted to think.

As for the Islamic scourge, that has been ongoing for a very long time.