Harvey's Destruction "May Have Solved The Auto Industry's Inventory Problem"

Tyler Durden's picture

On Tuesday, during the peak of the Harvey-related flooding, we reported that the hurricane may leave a greater trail of automobile destruction than even Katrina, the most expensive natural disaster in US history. In August 2005, Katrina wiped out some 500,000-600,000 vehicles but William Armstrong of CL King warned that Houston has about 5x more people than New Orleans did at the time.


The news was especially bad for retailers and auto dealers: storms of this magnitude bring not only millions in salvage-related charge offs for the auto industry but a loss of critical "selling days" for one of the biggest markets in the country.  As CNBC pointed out, Citi analyst Itay Michaeli figures Hurricane Harvey could knock about 500,000 units off the August auto SAAR to be reported tomorrow. Michaeli now estimates Harvey will affect some 125 counties in Texas and about 60 percent of the state's auto sales.

Before Harvey, Michaeli estimated the August sales pace for the country was going to be in the mid-16 million range. As the storm lingers over the area, Michaeli has dropped his estimate. "Our analysis suggests that Hurricane Harvey could push this down to the low-16 million unit range," Michaeli wrote in a note to clients.

"This is bad; real bad," said Marc Cannon, an AutoNation executive vice president. "Right now, we are focused on making sure all of our employees are safe and taken care of. At the same time, we're focusing on getting all of our stores up and running." AutoNation's 18 dealerships in the Houston remain shut as widespread flooding has not only swamped thousands of buildings in the Houston area, it's likely damaged hundreds, perhaps thousands of new cars and trucks parked on dealership lots.

Which, while terrible news to dealers - many of whom face bankruptcy if their insurance policies don't cover all the damages - may be just what the struggling U.S. OEM and supplier industry ordered, according to a new report by RBC. As bank analyst Joseph Spak writes, "while the devastation from Tropical Storm Harvey continues and our thoughts remain with the affected areas, we are beginning to wonder if the storm can, at least near-term, change the auto narrative. Harvey may have removed a number of the overhangs that caused investors to sour on the group."

The RBC strategist then lays out his reasoning why Harvey may have helped the US auto industry in terms of the 4 most pressing narratives: bloated inventory, demand concerns, peak mix, and used vehicles pricing. In fact, as he puts it, "In short, Harvey may have solved the industry's inventory problem."

Here is the spin:

  • Overhang 1: Bloated inventory. July 2017 days inventory stood at 68 days, 8 days higher than July 2016 and 13 days higher than the 10-year July average. This led investors to be worried about production cuts. Absolute inventory (at July 2017) was up ~330k units y/y. Edmunds estimates approximately 366k new cars and light trucks are on dealer lots in Texas that could be affected by Harvey. We believe a significant number of those could be damaged. Once Houston is stabilized, we see an opportunity for automakers to help re-position inventory from other geographies (we suspect GM could take advantage of this). In short, Harvey may have solved the industry's inventory problem.
  • Overhang 2: Demand concerns. We expect there could be a modest impact to August SAAR (we hedged by ~0.1mm to 16.4mm), but also believe the market won't put a lot of credence into the print. We would expect a further impact into early September before delayed purchases start to come back. Then over late 2017 and into 2018, replacement would occur. The actual damage to existing vehicles in operation is unknown but likely extensive. Cox Automotive estimates ~500k vehicles could ultimately be scrapped (they estimate Sandy was ~250k). As a result, we believe future NA production forecasts could be positively revised – a good catalyst for suppliers.
  • Overhang 3: Peak mix concerns. Moreover, this should be a rich mix as Texas is a key truck market (~14% of all full-size trucks, vs. 9% of overall sales; 1 out of 5 vehicles sold in Texas is a full-size truck). Key pickup truck suppliers AXL, TEN, BWA could benefit. We would favor Ford and F-150 suppliers and Ram and their suppliers over GM and K2XX suppliers given GM may not be able to participate as much given constraints from their program changeover.
  • Overhang 4: Used vehicle pricing concerns. We would expect near-term used vehicle pricing to improve given a rush of demand for loaner vehicles. This could help consumers looking to trade-in vehicles and potentially residual values for new leases.

In short, yet another twist on the familiar broken window, or in this case, busted car fallacy, which of course is great in capturing the flow impact on metrics such as GDP and consumption, but completely ignores the capital lost as a result of the inherent destruction, something which insurers, and perhaps the US taxpayer, will ultimately be on the hook for. Naturally, there is only so far that this type of "obligation transfer" can stretch before the whole construct falls apart, or else every time the US entered a recession a few strategically placed nukes would be sufficient to unleash a new economic golden age until the next contraction in the business cycle. Luckily, economists haven't gone that far yet. Unluckily, it is becoming increasingly obvious to everyone that the "next best thing" may be needed to boost growth. War.

As for cars, here is Spak's advice on how to trade the Texas tragedy:

"Time to tactically increase auto exposure. Net, with valuations that will screen attractive relative to other potential Harvey recovery plays, we would tactically look to increase exposure to the group. Separately, suppliers with meaningful Europe exposure should benefit from the Euro move. Among suppliers, larger beneficiaries could be: AXL, BWA, DAN, TEN. For OEMs, we would look to F."

If he is right, how long before a populist outcry demands that any industries benefiting from Harvey's destruction should be taxed more?

For now one thing is certain - stocks of RV makers have surged on the Harvey news, whether on expectations that just like during Katrina, FEMA will splurge on recreational vehicles to house the tens of thousands of emergency workers, or simply on expectations that with their homes - and car - badly damaged, tens of thousands of Texans will opt to buy the one object that combines the two.

Which just may push US GDP even more into the green: recall that in the first quarter, the biggest contributor to personal spending came from sales of... recreational goods and vehicles.

Incidentally, for those who wonder, FEMA's 2005 purchase of RVs ended up being a big hit to taxpayers. Back then, FEMA hurriedly bought 145,000 trailers and mobile homes just before and after Katrina hit, spending $2.7 billion largely through no-bid contracts. It then scrambled - unsuccessfully - to sell as many as 41,000 of the homes, netting about 40 cents on each dollar spent by taxpayers.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Bigly's picture

A white Ford Focus for everyone!!!

The_Juggernaut's picture

Doesn't change the fact that most of their sales are to subprime borrowers.

toady's picture

Sales? No, this is the FSA we're talking about!

GUS100CORRINA's picture

Harvey's Destruction "May Have Solved The Auto Industry's Inventory Problem"

My response: I have never understood how a DISASTER of EPIC proportions is good for an economy overall. What ends up happening is that PETER has to steal from PAUL to make it work. In this case, BILLIONS of TAX PAYER and INSURANCE DOLLARS will have to be allocated to cover the LOSS making policies more expensive and increasing DEBT.

Everyone eventually looses.

NotApplicable's picture

Broken window fallacies always fail to take the overall economy into account. Most specifically, they fail to realize that all the consumption spurred by reconstruction comes at the expense of other consumption that would've otherwise occurred.

Stuck on Zero's picture

At least 420,000 Ford 150s were destroyed in Houston and 12 sedans.  The question hitting Google is whether the 420,000 gunracks can be declared a total loss.

Normalcy Bias's picture

Why do you assume there were no gunracks in the sedans?

God Bless TEXAS!

Keyser's picture

Harvey may have solved the inventory glut for the auto industry, but it will surely damage the insurance companies that wrote the policies covering these inventories... Much like squeezing a balloon full of water, it has to go somewhere... Along with the homes damaged by the flooding, this might well kill in insurance industry... 

PT's picture

I told you no-one was going to get cheap cars.  One way or another, the excess inventory was not going to make its way to market.

Three businessmen meet while holidaying on a tropical island.  They get to discussing things:
"Nice holiday.  How did you end up here?"
"There was a fire that burnt down my factory.  Out of the insurance money, I had enough money left over so I thought I might take a holiday before getting back to work."
"Oh, what a co-incidence.  My warehouse burnt down too.  After paying out expenses, I had a few bucks left over and thought, before getting back to work, I'd take a holiday too."
And then they both turn to the third guy:
"How about you?"
"Well, that's quite remarkable.  The other day we had a flood that totally destroyed our warehouse and inventory - along with half the city.  With a bit of money left over from insurance, I too decided to come here for a holiday."
At which point the other two businessmen ask:
"How do you start a flood???"

Boris Badenov's picture

Insurance companies that write homeowner's policies are not liable for flooding.

FEMA writes all the flood policies in this country.

Hubbs's picture

No, just insurance customers who don't live near Houston or other earthquake, forest fire, or hurricaine prone areas who wind up having their rates jacked up.

greenskeeper carl's picture

Yep, that's exactly what's going to happen. Same with the federal flood insurance, I'm pretty sure it all goes into one pot, so when it was to pay out a lot of money, which it damn sure will, everyone's rates go up.

True Blue's picture

Speaking of all in one pot -what have your gasoline prices done today? Up $0.51/gal (%25 increase) today in my neck of the woods and they're already selling out in a few places.

toady's picture

Yes! You get a car, you get a  car, you get a car! And we'll only charge the tax payers twice the retail prices! (Plus a couple hundred billionfor the middlemen and politicians)

Oliver Klozoff's picture

It's raycist to say white.

Chauncey Gardener's picture

Nah, that's so minimalist. Hey, Houston, ya gotta rebuild, so 12 year fianancing with zero down on all new F-150's.

RawPawg's picture

Um,Yeah...Short Term Save

them bastards just gonna build up more glut in inventories 

some people NEVER Learn,Eh?

CJgipper's picture

You think these things aren't going to be dried out and sold as late model salvage on the same loan terms as new?


They aren't just going to crush these things.

greenskeeper carl's picture

Yep. This may help short term, but it isn't going to make a difference for more than a few months. There are still the record number of lease turn ins occurring and the other underlying problems of reduced demand.

Dutch1206's picture

There's always a silver lining

Oliver Klozoff's picture

This will suck for the auto co's. No silver there, just clouds.

Vimes's picture

Chinese tactics! Simply destroy after completion, "problem " solved! Turd world country style.....

mypearl's picture

That's messed up zerohedge.

Lumberjack's picture

I- am- not- bailing- them- out -again...

Re-define Channel Stuffing.

Fuck them over and out.

The insurance and re-insurance companies should take serious note...Common folks take priority now. Especially what's coming in for round 2 and maybe more.

"Common folks lives fucking matter now"


P. fucking S.

Dear Washington and MSM, please do not patronize us again. We are all getting tired of the bullshit. Same goes for you cocksuckers on Wall Street.

And I'm being nice...

Smedley's Butler's picture

Did it shift the problem to the insurance industry?

Smedley's Butler's picture

Wait... first we need a catchy acronym and honorable name to let ppl know it is a good program.

Lumberjack's picture

Who we bail out by proxy.

Blame needs to be squarely aimed at the problem. Not global warming nor every inconvenient excuses they can come up with. It was bad political and business decisions made over the last decade. Charity begins at home, in every home and not on the backs of others. We have been charitable enough to those with untold wealth by MANDATE, and those who seek a free ride. Yes, there are those that need help and god knows how many people like myself have done much for, but the self serving leadership and their cronies have enriched themselves on the backs of the rest of us, which has brought us all to where we are now.

Donald Trump can't make America Great Again, neither can congress nor the banks/insurance companies or even the MIC.

If we all work together, I bet we can.

Your call...

Blue Steel 309's picture

That was the subject of my comment on the first article noting the loss of autos.

aloha_snakbar's picture

If they only sold amphibious cars in Houston, we would not be having these conversations...

Yippie21's picture

cough, cough....   electric , with solar panel roof and wifi hotspot.  Genius!  Oh, and self driving!   Elon is putting a powerpoint together this weekend for some Govt' grant money.  Awesome!

wisehiney's picture

And IRMA is going to put her Big Sweet Juicy Cherry right on top!

JustPrintMoreDuh's picture

Krugman is having a particulary intense orgasm ... 

Bam_Man's picture


People whose houses were just flooded, and have NO flood insurance, are going to be running out to buy/lease a NEW car.

Dream on.

warsev's picture

Gee, we just lost everything; no shelter, no food, no clothes, no car, and no job 'cuz my employer got wiped out, too. I know! Let's go buy a NEW CAR! Uncle Sam will be sending us a check for it any day now!


ne14truth's picture

I heard a person this morning on the news that is still waiting for their check from catrina....4 years later they have not recieved one penny they are supposed to get from uncle sam, not one penny.

ne14truth's picture

I heard a person this morning on the news that is still waiting for their check from catrina....4 years later they have not recieved one penny they are supposed to get from uncle sam, not one penny.

Oliver Klozoff's picture

2005 was only 4 years ago?

Man that Zamadelica is some mean shit.

yellowsub's picture

The money was diverted into wars.

DetectiveStern's picture

As I sit here playing my HAARP wonder who could benefit

j0nx's picture

Yeah agreed. These people have no money and no flood insurance and still owe the bank for a destroyed house, not to mention no place to live for a while and no job because many businesses are also flooded and shut down. Their only way out is BK and they are not going to be plopping 20k down on a ford fusion any time soon unless uncle sugar makes everyone whole.

Oliver Klozoff's picture

I'm thinking the greater Houston area may never be rebuilt.

If Irma pays a visit, it's a certainty.

CJgipper's picture

That's the beauty of sign and drive.  No need for 20k or credit.

dogismycopilot's picture

first you BK, then you buy the truck.

TeethVillage88s's picture

Hell Yeah!

3 hours ago, this is my idea. Huge GDP rescue. Huge Stimulus for GDP. Used Cars/New Cars. Housing/Finance. Consumer Staples/Health Care.

- So weather control by West?
- Or weather control by East?
- Friendly or Enemy Action?
- Dumb Enemies stimulate US Economy & Strengthen US Dollar & US Economy & US Government/Private Central Bank?

wow... if only we could Trust CIA, World Bank, IMF, OECD...

What does Thomas Pikety say? ....hush...

Son of Captain Nemo's picture

"Once Houston is stabilized, we see an opportunity for automakers to help re-position inventory from other geographies (we suspect GM could take advantage of this). In short, Harvey may have solved the industry's inventory problem."

You have to be either one hell of a delusional MOFO writing that statement or the dumbest MOFO when you fail to mention that GM and Ford have overbuilt to "satisfy" WHAT EXACTLY???... Certainly those underwater autos were "underwater" without the "water" which means profit sorta got MISSED?!!!

Simply crazy!