What If Every Person Paid An Equal Share Of The Military Budget?

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Ryan McMaken via The Mises Institute,

Government employees and their apologists like to lecture Americans about how "freedom isn't free." And indeed it isn't. In recent years, the US military establishment has cost the American taxpayer around $700 billion per year. Thanks to the hard work of the American taxpayer, the US military - and other "defense" agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security - the US government is the most well-funded in the world. In spite of numerous ongoing interventions worldwide, casualties in the US military are low thanks to highly-advanced technology funded by - you guessed it - the American taxpayer. 

Now, for the sake of argument in this article, we'll just assume that the full $700 billion per year has something to do with actual defense. This is a highly debatable notion, of course. As more astute observers have noted in the past decade, it is not at all clear that the trillions of dollars spent in Iraq and Afghanistan have done anything at all to augment security in the United States.

We'll also conveniently ignore the catastrophic failures of our extremely-well-heeled American security states, such as those on September 11, 2001. 


Source: Office of Management and Budget, Table 4.1

All of that aside, we still find that American taxpayers are toiling mightily for their alleged freedom.

For this, reason, I've noted in the past that rather than the taxpayers thanking military personnel for their service, things should be the other way around: 

The taxpayers should be regularly approached on the street by soldiers and other government agents saying things like: 

There is no doubt that $700 billion is a lot of taxpayer money. But just how does this total break down on a per-person basis?

Well, if we divide $700 billion by the 320 million people in the United States, the per-person total comes out to $2,187 dollars. That's for each man, woman, and child. 

But that's not the real total. We also need to add in the substantial amounts paid in interest to service a debt that has largely been run up to finance military spending. To be conservative, let's say that one-fifth of the interest goes toward servicing war debts.

That brings us up to $2,300 per person, per year.

Now, of course, these costs are not spread out evenly among all taxpayers. The relatively high-income households pay more than low-income people when it comes to federal taxes. 

So, military personnel should especially be thanking higher-income taxpayers for their service. 

But, if American were taxed evenly for military costs, that would mean that a family of four would be paying $9,200 per year for "defense." After all, children need military defense, too, and somebody has to pay for it. Why not their parents? 

A large family, say one with four children, would be paying $13,800. 

Given that the median household income in the United States is $52,000, this is no small amount. 

If we're so concerned about Americans knowing that "freedom isn't free" it might be best to move toward a fee-for-service model. In that case, Americans would be acutely aware of how much they're shelling out for the military. On the other hand, were households faced with a $9,000 "defense" bill every year, they might be less inclined to thank someone else for spending all that money. 

Taxation Via Regulation

None of this includes the many non-monetary ways that Americans are taxed to support the military establishment and its employees. We could also include as “taxation” the destruction of privacy in the name of “fighting terrorism.” Thanks to the USA PATRIOT Act, among other pieces of legislation, Americans are subject to many violations of their Fourth Amendment rights in the name of “protecting” freedom. 

The many abuses and excesses of American airport security under the TSA are a form of taxation as well. Every time an American taxpayer is forced to miss a flight, has property confiscated, or is generally treated like garbage by the TSA, this is an additional cost imposed.

Border controls impose many costs as well. Americans are now routinely subjected to extensive searches and seizures at the border, as border agents rifle through personal effects, seize phones, and subject taxpayers to hours of questioning upon re-entry.

Moreover, in the name of security, the US can close off Americans from access to foreign resources. This occurs when the US imposes trade embargoes or other trade restrictions in the name of security. When an American wishes to buy goods from a person in a “restricted” country, or wishes to sell goods to a person in the same country, that cuts the American off from using her or her private property in a peaceful manner.

A similar problem occurs when the US denies entry to persons who have been invited into the US by American taxpayers. When a taxpayer invites a friend or colleague into the US — but then that friend or colleague is denied entry — this imposes yet another cost on American taxpayers.

None of these costs show up in tax bills, of course. But they exist.

All the while, we’re being told that these restrictions, embargoes, searches, domestic spy operations, and bans are all necessary to protect freedom and security. That may or may not be true. But even if they are true in some cases, let’s stop pretending that they’re not imposing a significant cost on those who are supposedly receiving a gift from government agents who are “serving” the American public.

This isn’t to say that defense of property — including human persons — is something that need not be done. Of course security is an essential service in any society. This is true even when monopolistic government agencies co-opt security services.

But, this doesn’t make security services special. Food production, energy production, and home construction are all essential services. Nevertheless, we’re not told to run up to farmers and oil workers and roofers and thank them for their “service.” But, we’d notice a lack of food, housing, and energy immediately, were those workers to disappear. Moreover, try running a military without food and gasoline. You’ll quickly find it’s rather difficult.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
SHsparx's picture

What if every person demanded an investigation of the 8.5 trillion that was "lost" in the pentagon?

Deathrips's picture

Thought it was 18 trillion according to CAF. solari report.






Deathrips's picture

Catherine Austin Fitts is solid. She links the 18 trillion missing to govt pages.


She accounts the theft or some of it to funding a breakaway civilization....that probably doesnt care much about you.


If youre paying..might as well know whats for dinner.



stacking12321's picture

from the article:

"In spite of numerous ongoing interventions worldwide, casualties in the US military are low thanks to highly-advanced technology funded by - you guessed it - the American taxpayer. "


most casualties are self-inflicted, as in suicide.

i'd want to kill myself too, if i were wracked with the guilt of knowing that i was part of an organization that committed war crimes and acts of mass-murder around the world so that an elite few could profit.


Deathrips's picture

The new PC term for remorse and guilt is PTSD.

The MIC is how they hid the theft to fund their pet projects.

Those fighting for american freedom actually helped hide the looting from main stream view. They were your neighbors..the alphas that would normally fight off a threat. They were misguided by those that bore false witness and attacked the wrong target for the wrong reasons. Its a mistake till you ignore reality then its evil.



Shemp 4 Victory's picture


Government employees and their apologists like to lecture Americans about how "freedom isn't free." And indeed it isn't.

What passes for Freedom® in the US isn't worth the price.

Bes's picture

it's a good thing we didn't elect a guy surrounded by generals

or a guy who promises to expand the sad, underfunded, miserable military

or a guy who thinks the military is so great the police should be military too

or a guy who wants to inject more trillions into the pentagon

or a guy who loves terrorist Israel and Saudi Arabia


fuck the MIC and anyone in bed with them


NidStyles's picture

If anyone should be covering the expenses, it's Israel.

knukles's picture

That's not a bad idea, everybody paying an equal share.
But you know, to be fair, we'd have to means teat it for equality.
And tax the higher earners more to pay for it.

Can you tell me where the self help books are?

Bulgars's picture

Why should I pay for it? I don't need it, I have nothing to protect. Those who own the land and all other assets should pay for military to protect them.

Itinerant's picture

The author's number haven't even added in [1] the Nukes, part of the Dept of Energy, and; [2] all the secret budgets for secret agencies, 1 million employed. Many put the actual military spending (including actual war expenses, not part of the regular spending, but supplemental/contingen) at around $1Trillion per year. 

bluez's picture

We were supposed to have a Peace Dividend in 1992. What happened?

E-Knight's picture

I had long considered joining the military, but I always stopped because of issues like this.

Muddy1's picture

What if every illegal had to pay "their fair share" instead of getting a bunch of freebies?


What if every illegal had to thank tax paying Americans for going to work, earning money, and paying taxes so they get all of their freebies?


What if every illegal getting said frebies had to go home?  Talk about saving money!!!

boattrash's picture

What if everybody just said "fuck it" and stayed home for one month, not producing any revenue for Uncle Sam?

Implied Violins's picture

Fuck that, if we've already been "forced" to pay for this shit, then I want my fucking rocket launcher NOW, dammit.

Falconsixone's picture

That might get their attention. People are to self-centered, chicken shit and stupid. The govt. has a bank that will print all the money they want to borrow,

knukles's picture

I have top go to the bathroom

Implied Violins's picture

I usually do that with my bottom, but then I'm boring in a missionary style kind of way.

stacking12321's picture

everybody's "fair share" of taxes is zero.

if you didn't intentionally enter into a biding contract for "services" (aggression against other nations is hardly a service IMO, but that's another topic), then you're not obligated to pay.

taxation is theft.


Lucky Guesst's picture

What if only the Americans that vote to keep illegals here have to split the share of their welfare and healthcare etc? You opted in when you voted and have the option to opt out the next year. The only money's available to illegals would then have to come out of the voluntary moneys.

are we there yet's picture

8.5 billion? Next time I want to be invited to that primo party.

ONEwarrior's picture

What if Ryan McMak suck my ...

cossack55's picture

What about tax rebates?

hungrydweller's picture

I'd rather spend most of that on my own guns and butter, thank you.

Autonomous's picture

"...Thanks to the hard work of the American taxpayer, the US military - and other "defense" agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security - the US government is the most well-funded in the world...."


US taxpayers are only funding a tiny fraction of the defense budget, the rest is funded via fiat currency expansion. Everybody who uses the dollar is actually funding US military budget and wars not just "taxpayers."

lasvegaspersona's picture

Every one who 'uses' dollar is NOT doing the funding. I can get and spend a dollar with no loss of purchasing power. It is those who hold dollars that pay. The longer one holds dollars the more they pay.

khnum's picture

Sure come collect it in either 5.56 or 7.62mm installments

Sliced into ribbons's picture

An American soldier hasn't died defending this country since Pearl Harbor.

Stranger_in_a_Strange_Land's picture

I think you have to go back further than that.

Hawaii was an independent nation, unlawfully stolen by the U.S. and wasn't even a state at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack.  The Japanese were merely slapping the nearest weapon out of the hand pointed at them.

1033eruth's picture

Hawaii was a territory from 1858 - 1959.  Stick your politically correct "lawfulness" up your ass.  Sick of this routine where in the entire history of humanity, nobody was allowed to explore or invade because it was 'unlawful" or it was "stealing" from the indigenous.  It happened, get over it asshole!

bluez's picture

That is exactly how your OLED65C7P 65-Inch 4K Ultra HD Smart OLED TV "fell into my hands" during the flood! Thank You!

Mr. Universe's picture

US business men supported the US take over of the Hawaiian monarchy. They wanted to control the islands rather than the British who were next in line. Those missionaries who came to do good did very well indeed. The western based land ownership dealeo was far different from the Hawaiian one that worked for the all the people. The However the elites Kapu system was fubared beyond belief. If you were tagged for an offense the penalty was usualy death, with one exception. If you could make it to a City of Refuge before they killed you, you were free.  

Did they ruin paradise? Yes, but it what really killed the Hawaiian culture was westerners teaching their kings how to really profit off the serfs. They sold them out, built palaces and had scones at tea time only to be thrown in prison with the support of the USS Boston. Life is hard, it's even harder when your a stupid Hawaiian king duped by bankers.

dot.dot's picture

The pay for service member is quite high by historical standards.  A LTC w/ 15 yrs makes about 95k salary -plus another 25K for a housing allowance.  Many of these people are merely paper pushers who have never even had an overseas assignment.



The Gun Is Good's picture

Mercs must always be well-paid for their loyalty.


(Thanks for the link, Humungous!)

Big Creek Rising's picture

And if stationed at the Pentagram they get an extra 27 percent "location adjustment"

1033eruth's picture

You're insinuating that an overseas assignment means something?  If you're pushing paper domestically, you're probably pushing paper overseas as well.

max2205's picture

LBJ would be proud 

cherry picker's picture

Why not dissolve the government in total and start a democratic government where taxpayers are only allowed a vote and all .gov employees are denied a vote.

Muddy1's picture

Because democracies DON'T work.  On the other hand, a Representative Republic does work.  Especially when the framework for that government is followed. All 17 pages of it.

FreeNewEnergy's picture

I would love that, especially for public school teachers.

You get a check, no vote, quit whining. Oh, and you're fired...

because you suck at what we're paying you to do, but, good news, you can vote!

Big Creek Rising's picture

Nary a word in those 17 pages about public education

Lert's picture

The cost is not worth the effort put forth. We don't even protect our borders with all of that cost, so how could it be worth any cost at all?

Rebelrebel7's picture

Made me laugh! 

I would prefer to let the war mongers enlist their friends and family to fight their own battles with them, rather than dragging all of us innocent by standers  into It! 

We fought the Vietnam war for French control of tea and cobalt! That's completely insane!

DeathingerStar's picture

An itemized tax bill... We the people wouldn't know who to kill first. 

Big Hugh's picture

The politicians, then the banksters.