Amid 2017's Fascist Disinformation Mania, Brandon Smith Fears "Something Larger Afoot"

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Brandon Smith via Alt-Market.com,

Years ago in 2012, I published a thorough examination of disinformation tactics used by globalist institutions as well as government and political outfits to manipulate the public and undermine legitimate analysts working to expose particular truths of our social and economic conditions.

If you have not read this article, titled Disinformation: How It Works, I highly recommend you do so now. It will act as a solid foundation for what I am about to discuss in this article. Without a basic understanding of how lies are utilized, you will be in no position to grasp the complexities of disinformation trends being implemented today.

Much of what I am about to discuss will probably not become apparent for much of the mainstream and portions of the liberty movement for many years to come. Sadly, the biggest lies are often the hardest to see until time and distance are achieved.

If you want to be able to predict geopolitical and economic trends with any accuracy, you must first accept a couple of hard realities. First and foremost, the majority of cultural shifts and fiscal developments within our system are a product of social engineering by an organized collective of power elites. Second, you must understand that this collective is driven by the ideology of globalism — the pursuit of total centralization of financial and political control into the hands of a select few deemed as "superior" concertmasters or "maestros."

As globalist insider, CFR member and mentor to Bill Clinton, Carroll Quigley, openly admitted in his book Tragedy And Hope:

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank ... sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

The philosophical basis for the globalist ideology is most clearly summarized in the principles of something called "Fabian Socialism," a system founded in 1884 which promotes the subversive and deliberate manipulation of the masses towards total centralization, collectivism and population control through eugenics. Fabian Socialists prefer to carry out their strategies over a span of decades, turning a population against itself slowly, rather than trying to force changes to a system immediately and outright.  Their symbol is a coat of arms depicting a wolf in sheep's clothing, or in some cases a turtle (slow and steady wins the race?) with the words "When I strike I strike hard."

Again, it is important to acknowledge that these people are NOT unified by loyalty to any one nation, culture, political party, mainstream religion or ethnic background.

In fact, they will happily sacrifice any country or any group of people if it will get them closer to their goal.

They are not defenders of the free market as the idiots on the extreme left like to claim. In fact, they abhor any business model that is not dominated by a government and a bureaucracy designed to give them an unfair advantage through legislation. Anyone who thinks free markets are the cause of our economic ailments in the past decade has lost sight of the fact that we have not had anything even remotely resembling free markets for more than a century. The corporations leftists and common socialists constantly wail about could not exist without government charter and the legal loopholes surrounding limited liability. So please, socialist warriors, shut up about free markets. You have no idea what you are talking about.

The globalists are also not loyal acolytes of any particular theological tradition (at least not any that are clearly identified). Meaning, they are NOT organized around Judaism or even loyalty to Israel as is the common claim of the clowns that make up what some are now calling the "Alt-Right." Globalists do not care about Jewish people or Jewish beliefs even though some of them are genetically Jewish.

While a minority of globalists are associated with the political extremist faction known as "Zionism," Zionists are just another exploitable group to them, and their greater objective has nothing to do with the elevation of Israel. They will gladly fund Islamic extremist groups, for example, that desire and will willingly carry out the obliteration of Israel or the murder of Jewish people. They also exploit elements of the Israeli government to trigger chaos on the other side of the chess board.

Those who argue that all our ills are engineered by "the jeeeewwws!" or "the tribe" are poorly informed and have chosen an overly simplistic broad-brush explanation for a much more complex enemy they have no ability to fathom. They tend to cite "evidence" that is highly unverified and poorly sourced.  They think the Rothschilds are the root of all globalism when the Rothschilds are just one element of a greater cabal.  Ask them which globalist institutions actually argue for Jewish or Zionist supremacy and they won't be able to produce evidence of any, unlike the numerous globalist institutions and champions that OPENLY argue for GLOBALISM even at the expense of Jews and the nation of Israel (i.e. Barack Obama's consistent support of Islamic extremist groups and the Arab Spring).  In fact, ask them for evidence that Jews or Zionists are the core of the globalist agenda and they will copy and paste the same list of perhaps two dozen Council on Foreign Relations members that are Jewish while ignoring the thousands of other members that are not.

They also tend to argue that the fascist movements of the past century were actually "doing battle with the globalist agenda" — i.e. they were the "good guys."  Sorry to break it to the "Alt-Right" crowd, but almost everything they believe is wrong.

I have noticed a disturbing trend within liberty movement and conservative circles; a kind of invasion, if you will. A minority of disinformation agents and useful idiots are operating within liberty outlets to push an ideological revolution oddly similar in tactics to those used by Soros funded groups overtaking the political left. It is my belief that while some globalist created movements are meant to provoke the left to zealotry and cultural Marxism, other globalist created movements are meant to provoke the right to zealotry and a misplaced adoration for fascism.  Divide and conquer is the game here.

As I noted in my last article 'Globalists Will Throw Antifa To The Wolves To Further Their Agenda', the left is essentially a lost cause. Any semblance of the so called "classical liberal" that is so commonly linked back to certain American revolutionaries and founding fathers was snuffed out long ago. They don't exist anymore. Conservatives (not necessarily Republicans) have taken up the mantle of individual liberty and small government. The labels may have changed, but the principles remain the same. Conservatives are the natural enemy of globalists. The ideals of conservative thought and the globalist agenda are mutually exclusive — both cannot exist within the same space at the same time. One of them has to go for the other to function.

So, what are elitists with aspirations of becoming god-kings to do? Well, they could try to attack conservatives directly, but this does not mean our ideals will disappear. The ideals might even spread and flourish in reaction to a crackdown, which is the opposite effect that social engineers desire. Instead, 4th generation warfare is in order. That is to say, conservatives must be bamboozled into embracing actions contrary to their principles.

They must be conned into applauding big government instead of fighting against it. They must be tricked into rationalizing violations of the Constitution instead of exposing said violations as a spreading cancer. They must be cajoled into cheering for even more expensive and ill conceived war efforts that do not serve the interests of Americans. They must be fooled into praising the relationship between corporations and government instead of working to dismantle the government framework that coddles corporations and protects them from free markets.

While globalists cannot destroy conservatism from without, they might be able to use 4th Gen tactics to destroy conservatism from within. Conservatives have to be convinced that conservative values are weaknesses that must be abandoned for the "greater good." At this point, conservatives would no longer be conservative; they become something else entirely.

While the liberty movement in particular has been hyper-focused on the dangers of cultural Marxism and communism, the real danger is the psyop being played within the political right. Both communism and fascism serve globalist interests. It is to their advantage to promote both and to even pit one against the other. The key is to use the left to drive conservatives to desperate measures and then link conservatives to ideals that are counter to their natures until the original ideals are forgotten.

There are some core weakness to the propaganda campaign that gut the narrative completely. The fact that the establishment is grasping at such methods to me seems desperate, but then again, I make a rule never to underestimate people's laziness or their ignorance. So, lets look at the primary argument popping up in every liberty comment thread and chat board: "Globalists are purely communists, and fascism is a misunderstood and necessary counterpunch."

This assertion falls apart fantastically when historical fact is applied and one realizes that BOTH communism and fascism were movements funded and supported by the very same financial elites. Yes, that's right, fascism cannot be opposed to globalism, because globalists created fascism to serve their purposes.

To find the most comprehensive evidence compiled on the relationship between the financial elites and the rise of fascism and communism, one of the best sources is the work of Professor Antony Sutton. Here Sutton answers questions on some of these ties, including the elitist funding and technological development of the Nazis as well as the Soviet Union:

Let's not forget about the Bush family legacy of financial support for the Third Reich - yet some people are attempting to feed a growing argument that the globalists were opposed to Hitler or vice versa...?

Globalist conglomerates like the Rockefeller's Standard Oil were even exposed during the Nuremberg trials as having funded and aided Nazi technological advancements throughout the war using close relationships to IG Farben. This is made clear in the 'Von Knieriem Documents' within the Nuremberg and WWII congressional investigative record, which can be read in full in Elimination Of German Resources For War, starting on page 1302.

This means that the disinfo-argument that "perhaps the elites funded fascism in the beginning but turned against it later" is a no-go. Of course, these revelations were ultimately buried and no one of import was ever prosecuted.

So, to be absolutely clear - Fascist movements are NOT a counterweight to communism, they are controlled opposition to communism.  If you want to join a real opposing movement to cultural marxists and communists, then the only answer is a movement that supports individual liberty and the reduction of government power.  Fascism does not support either.

Beyond general cash flow and technological backing for fascist governments, the globalist ideology is almost identical to fascist models. Mainstream assumptions aside, fascists are not true nationalists, rather, they are ideologues seeking to spread globally — their propaganda base just happens to begin with national pride. As mentioned earlier, globalism is best understood through the lens of Fabian Socialism, and Fabian Socialism is essentially fascism; though fascism tends to add a frontman dictator as a figurehead rather than an open cabal of oligarchs.

Fabian Socialists (globalists) are so fond of fascism that they have in the past presented unabashed defense of the Third Reich. George Bernard Shaw, a celebrity member of the Fabians, is notorious for praising the methods of both the Nazis and Stalin, including the mass murder of undesirables.

The difference between the communist model and the Nazi model? Nazis believed in population control based on genetic origin, while communists believed in population control based on labor potential. Both standards appeal to globalists.

Bottom line - fascists are slaves for globalists, just as communists are slaves for globalists. Both support big government power, both undermine personal freedoms. There is little more than cosmetic differences between them when one knows the true history behind each movement.

The disinformation brigade drumming up the pro-fascist/pro-Hitler dialogue on conservative forums may be part of a funded agenda to demonize liberty movements by false association. Or, it may be an attempt to lure conservatives into thinking the only way to counteract the insanity of the extreme left is to become more like their classic enemy, the fascist. And, perhaps it is simply a gaggle of morons with zero historical reference parroting what they have been hearing in their online echo chambers for years, but now they see an opportunity generated by the fear surrounding the mania of cultural Marxists.

They will seethe in the comments of this article, that is certain. I will be accused of being a "Zionist agent," with zero proof of course. They will froth at the mouth about how "something must be done" about the cultural marxists as if our only other choice is to adopt even more egregious methods.  They will gather a dozen of their friends from their favorite online haunts and "mob up" to flood forums with angry discord to make it appear that there are more of them out there than really exist (much like social justice warriors do), but it is unlikely they will produce any hard evidence countering anything I have presented here. Their opinions might be loud, but they are also irrelevant.

My concern is that there is something larger afoot.

That maybe, just maybe, the conservative right is being tenderized in preparation for radicalization, just as much as the left has been radicalized. For the more extreme the social divide, the more likely chaos and crisis will erupt, and the globalists never let a good crisis go to waste. Zealots, regardless of their claimed moral authority, are almost always wrong in history. Conservatives cannot afford to be wrong in this era. We cannot afford zealotry.  We cannot afford biases and mistakes; the future of individual liberty depends on our ability to remain objective, vigilant and steadfast. Without self examination, we will lose everything.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
putaipan's picture

bro- much love and support.

 

but a week from now can we bring up a verboten zh subject? .... what to do with your stacks in a real 'boating accident' scenerio?

i.e./aka - "i sure wish it was in digital tulips now" or "fuck,,,, it's the blue lights of civil asset forfiture in my rear view"

Praetorian Guard's picture

Hmmm, does the Business Plot of 1933 bring anything to mind????

 

COME JOIN US AT WWW.GUNSGRUBANDGOLD.COM

CELEBRATING A DECADE IN SERVICE!!!

ALL ARE WELCOME!!!!

Golden Showers's picture

Ok, Thanks for refuting all the evidence of CFR membership, Dual Israeli US citizens in US office, and putting the entire thing in perspective. As if the facts don't speak for the facts. The fact is tha Mossad did 911. The US government allowed it and helped it. And the world we live in is exactly the best outcome for the powers that be.

And you're forgetting that a lot of us believe in Jesus Christ. Most of us aren't concerned with whatever scmoo you have to tell us about. Like the idea that secular people are beholden first to their own government of corrupt war freaks, baby eaters, and have nothing in common with the people, aka the enemy.

Dude, don't worry about us. Thanks for all your concern and all but shit ain't like that. You don't get to tell me who I am or hundreds of thousands of other people exhausted and sickened by the very same dual citizens choking us out every day. You're like some kind of magical thinker who can't see straight up facts and connections over decades and want's to warn people for their own good whatever you make up.

Fuck you, asshole. Get off my lawn.

 

 

runningman18's picture

Yeah, a handful of Jews and zionists out of thousands of members in the CFR sure does drive home the case that it's all a "Jew conspiracy", plus, I do believe the Saudis among others were involved in 9/11 too, just sayen...

ebear's picture

"And you're forgetting that a lot of us believe in Jesus Christ."

Strange juxtaposition - a Christian using a Discordian symbol as an avatar.

Care to explain that?

Mr Hankey's picture

"I am Eris.And I say you are free". My favorite goddess.

ebear's picture

Careful who you worship Mr. H.  Eris isn't too particular who she messes with. 

Mr Hankey's picture

Lose the dickless dead joo on a stick if you want to live.

Mr Hankey's picture

Get you some gods& godesses that are into winning.Or at least have genitalia. 

Rebelrebel7's picture

Im glad that you wrote about this Brandon. I have never seen so many crazy anti -Jewish posts  as I see on Zero Hedge, and I have never encountered anyone in my life that refers to people as goyim, tribe, jooo,  and the whole Rothschild thing is just a disinformation campaign. The Rothschild family hasn't been powerful in over a century. I suspect that it is Goldman Sachs and JPM employees perpetrating the myth and people have to be careful not to fall into a disinformation trap which is then used to discredit them and they end up sounding like crazy conspiracy theorist kooks !

We do not have any conservatives or libertarians or capitalists in our government. There is nothing conservative about all of the laws which violate the Bill of Rights , spending a trillion dollars a year on wars half way around the world on countries that have done nothing to us!

What we have are Mussolini style debt financed  corporate militaristic bankists!

It is not even remotely close to capitalism! Where is the capital?! See our trade deficit! It was 500 billion dollars last year. We must really suck at creating capital !

 

Oldwood's picture

Small government conservatism has no defense against big government progressives anymore than nonviolent pacifists have a defense against violent attacking warriors. To do more than resist is to become what we fight.

How is it possible to fight this otherwise? Which is why we will lose.

Our only non hypocritical defense is through a democratic vote, and that fails once government obtains the power to take from the few to give to the majority. The concentration of wealth serves many purposes.

runningman18's picture

The biggest lie in human history - that you have to become a monster to defeat a monster.  There is always another way.   

Rebelrebel7's picture

Right! Defeat them with the truth!

bobdog54's picture

Only works if people are listening and they will only start listening when their very survival is at risk.
Was too good, too long. We have over two generations of cluelessness to wake up... never mind the bell curve of stupidity of the older generations. Not complete without mentioning the bell curve level of greed / total self interest.

Mr Hankey's picture

Fighting for your life is monstrous? You sound like my no1 deadliest enemy.ITZ COMING 

Rebelrebel7's picture

I'm just saying wake up and drink the coffee! Skip the neocon koolaide! The very fact that they are new conservatives ought to be a clue! It is an oxymoron!

Republicans in office are just as ridiculous as democrats in office! 

Just start talking about and refuse to  believe that the republicans are conservatives, capitalists, or libertarians! They are the antithesis of all of them, just as the democrats are the antithesis of progress, champions of the middle class and poor, and liberalism ! The only thing that they do liberally is robin hood in reverse, fascism, and lying!

LA_Goldbug's picture

This is what is missing in the US so called Democracy.

https://uglytruththailand.wordpress.com/tag/taksin-shinawat/

The People have been turned into sheep and for far too long have not been reacting. They have been conditioned NOT to react or question.

Talking about small gov. when debt is at 21 Trillion is a Joke.

Rebelrebel7's picture

And see our 21 trillion  national debt! America - The most incompetent capitalists in world history!

Mr Hankey's picture

"RebelRebel,your face is a mess"

Mustafa Kemal's picture

This article is spot on IMO. Thank you.

Strousen in his Naked Capitalist likened communism and fascism as a good guy bad guy duo that you could pit against each other and whichever way wins, the people lose. 

MrBoompi's picture

It's true.  Never underestimate the stupidity of people.  The very smart sociopaths who run the world know these are easy targets.  Even smart non-sociopaths can be made to become apathetic, hopeless, and depressed. 

putaipan's picture

 Even smart non-sociopaths can be made to become apathetic, hopeless, and depressed

 

what? me worry?

 

back to the article at hand.... that brandon kid- saw him onna youtube, not sogreat. but damn! the kid sure can string a sentance or two thoughts together inna straight line,g ood on  im!

holdbuysell's picture

"Bottom line - fascists are slaves for globalists, just as communists are slaves for globalists. Both support big government power, both undermine personal freedoms. There is little more than cosmetic differences between them when one knows the true history behind each movement."

 

If one is of Nephilim bloodlines, one wouldn't differentiate among the object of enslavement and thus communism and fascism are indistinguishable.

subversion's picture

Kinda reminds me of the time that Judah declared war on Germany before Hitler had power....but history reversed that.

Alananda's picture

Politically, socially, and economically, BS presents a classic, perhaps penultimate dialectic, the "individual" vs. "collective" (here, "global state").  As I read his essay, BS argues that other prominent, still-in-play dialectics serve as "false starters", misleading or distracting from the main show.  He uses "communism" vs. "fascism" as an example, not necessarily a "straw man", I suppose.  BS points his finger toward "globalists", who, for the most part, remain nameless -- players to be named later.

The philosophical basis for the globalist ideology is most clearly summarized in the principles of something called "Fabian Socialism," a system founded in 1884 which promotes the subversive and deliberate manipulation of the masses towards total centralization, collectivism and population control through eugenics.

Having read many of his essays over the years, I think this essay the first I have ever read that BS includes the words "Judaism", "Jewish", and "Jews".  He does so, of course, in context, emphasizing that "these people [i.e., globalists] are NOT unified by loyalty to any one nation, culture, political party, mainstream religion or ethnic background.  In fact, they will happily sacrifice any country or any group of people if it will get them closer to their goal." The history of Germany demonstrates that, as does the history of Russia, with the irony of integral Jewish involvement in both stories, each written by the victors.  

Then we encounter yet another dialectic, one so familiar that it feels like well worn slippers, warmed by the hearth, slipped over cold feet just in from a snowy trek:  "Conservatism" vs....WHAT?  Brandon declares that "Conservatives cannot afford to be wrong in this era. We cannot afford zealotry.  We cannot afford biases and mistakes; the future of individual liberty depends on our ability to remain objective, vigilant and steadfast. Without self examination, we will lose everything."

At this point in Mr. Smith's argument, besides a more intelligible, operational definition of "globalists", conservatives' putative enemy, I long for and seek first principles, something to hang my hat on.  We have what BS has called the "liberty movement"; we also have more formally constituted groups, like G.E. Griffin's Freedom Force International (FFI); and now we have (born again??) "conservatism".  Do we conservatives have GOD on our side to assist opposing a seemingly godless, even Satanic force in "globalism"?  Does Jesus Christ have even a minor role to play in this unfolding drama?  Or is religion -- or, as I prefer, spirituality -- irrelevant to battles before us, the war pitting WE the "conservatives" against THEM the "globalists"?

Perhaps BS, having dispensed with the straw man of "the jeeeewwws!" or "the tribe", and having set to rest false distinctions between fascism and communism, will return to us with a list of First Principles that define his "conservatism", perhaps a list akin to FFI's statement of principles.

Full disclosure:  I once served as a "national coordinator" for alt-market, appointed such by Brandon Smith (BS). 

runningman18's picture

Well you could've actually read the article and then you would have seen he did describe some of the values of conservatives.  From the article:

"That is to say, conservatives must be bamboozled into embracing actions contrary to their principles....They must be conned into applauding big government instead of fighting against it. They must be tricked into rationalizing violations of the Constitution instead of exposing said violations as a spreading cancer. They must be cajoled into cheering for even more expensive and ill conceived war efforts that do not serve the interests of Americans. They must be fooled into praising the relationship between corporations and government instead of working to dismantle the government framework that coddles corporations and protects them from free markets."

He repeated some of these points a couple of times in other portions. Not sure anyone cares what you did or did not do for Alt-Market, though.  I've read his website for years and he has written articles about what defines conservatives and the liberty movement over and over.  So if you were a national whatever, you would know his stance already.  

Alananda's picture

Having read the essay carefully, I still ask for a well articulated set of principles, not simply "values" favored in opposition to others' way of furthering THEIR cause and associated values.  If you define yourself in terms of somebody else, just who the hell are you?  A mere mirror image, I'd say, dialectically.  As far as "values" go, I would hope values flow from principles.  Just saying "conservatism", "liberty movement", does little to nothing to define that for which we stand, that for which we choose to defend to the death.  And, in the end, we still have to deal with "I" and "We", in family, community, and nation.  Brandon Smith exudes and encourages polarity and, as such, I suspect he serves as "controlled opposition". 

runningman18's picture

That's not really what he did.  He discussed what conservatives should do and should not do, he didn't only define them by their opposition, but it's inevitable that a group's "values" are going to have an antithesis and that this does help define both groups to a point.  Seems clear that Smith defines conservatives as small government and individual liberty.  He repeated that a couple of times along with other insights.  And like I said, if you were actually a "coordinator" for his site then you would know he's written a lot of articles on conservative and liberty movement philosophy, so why don't you just look those up and answer your own questions?  Plus "values" vs. "principles"?  Methinks you are playing semantics.  I'm not going to waste time on a debate about some horseshit conspiracy theories concerning Smith being "controlled opposition", that's not something you can prove so why even bring it up?   

Mr Hankey's picture

If he doesn't name the jew he is my enemy.The Jew is your enemy,White man.Before,now and forever.

Internet-is-Beast's picture

Absolutely the most astute comments I've seen on this blog. "Nameless globalists" indeed! That and the exonerative effort leapt off the page in this article. You addressed one of the most well-crafted and well-written examples of controlled opposition that has appeared on this blog as well. The key seems to be understanding the dialectic. Made my day! Many thanks.

Beware of the scribes and the pharisees!

LA_Goldbug's picture

Not sure who is bombing you with "-" but they must either be BS or nubies.

"Just saying "conservatism", "liberty movement", does little to nothing to define that for which we stand, that for which we choose to defend to the death. "

This is the key. Labels, as always, are meaningless. The Principles (expressed) are what is important as well as ACTIONS to reach them.

Triple A's picture

More people need to understand individual freedom and liberty is the only way forward. Government is just force and destroyers of freedom. Unfortunately most of America is so dependent on this corrupt institution that they can't fight it and must believe in it for their survival.

Mr Hankey's picture

For White people Of,by andfor White people 

BeepBeepRichie's picture

1917=2017. History rhymes

Anteater's picture

PNAC- 'America needs a New Pearl Harbor'. All Jews.

Israeli 'art students' with climbing gear and det fuses

had access to towers core shafts for months. All Jews.

Dancing Israelis with logo of plane hitting tower. All Jews.

Trump children and Rodham children married to. All Jews.

2008 Financial Meltdown. Fred Mishkin, professor at the Columbia Business School who served on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and as consultant to the International Monetary Fund; Arthur Levitt, chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as well as adviser to the Carlyle Group and policy advisor to Goldman Sachs; Lawrence Summers, professor of economics and president at Harvard University, chief economist for the World Bank, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, and managing partner at the D.E. Shaw & Company hedge fund; Harvard economist Martin Feldstein, who sat on the board of American International Group (AIG) as it imploded from its credit default swaps and needed a government bailout. All Jews!

Which is not to say Jews aren't 'great people', but if it's a $250,000 fine to name the Enemy as Israel,

and a felony with prison time in Europe, then how will we save the Republic, if we can't name them?

Imagine if Grey Aliens landed from outer space and took over one nation after another,

Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, finally America, but you were forbidden to name them!?

Now all we have left is the whirlwind, under a Goldman:Luciferian Molochracy.

What is 'afoot' is plain as day! The 'bust out' of USA by dual-Israelis,

like Poroshenko's bust out of Ukraine, like Modi's bust out of India. 

under Jared at 666 Fifth, and one ring in London to rule them all.

"America never existed. There are no Americans."

Mazel tuv!

 

 

FreeEarCandy's picture

Well I think the system is so rotten to the core that the only way to fix it is by taking matters into our own hands. If that means French revolution style justice so be it. The body count will be lower than WW3 and the ten thousand year glow that follows. Sure everyone is being played against the other, and the fact of the matter is no one will be able to put humpty back together again. There isn't going to be a peaceful solution and people are not going to unite under one banner. As far as I see it the left has the advantage because Trump has triggered their outrage, while the Trumpsters have not yet gotten over their cognitive dissonance. But that may very well change soon as Trump has just about abandoned every bullshit promise he has made to them. Give it time for it to sink into their thick heads that they have no messiah and we will have the makings of a real 3 dimensional civil war medieval style-the military-the left-the right. if we are lucky the left and the right will come to their senses and unite against the military/corrupt government and then perhaps this country will have the opportunity to sort out the rest of the nonsense and get on the proper path of healing themselves in a united fashion. However, be warned that the dog tends to return to its vomit for another go, and any 2 party system will only invite the conspirators you are talking about back into the house we call our government. For as you say these fuckers have no boarders and are spread throughout the world. We can only clean up our neck of the woods. The rest of the world is someone else's business. Moreover, if they see their co conspirators losing the battle here, they will likely invade us at our weakest moment during out little revolution here.  

There are other peaceful solutions but I see no hope to organize. If we could we could strike at the heart of the beast by not paying our taxes or go on a national work strike like Poland did in the 80's. But such tactics require cooperation from everyone. If one fears civil war, then one better start figuring out how to organize very quickly because the due date of this revolution is fast approaching. Trumps failures could likely be the set up followed by some triggering event.

Please excuse the lack of punctuation's. 

Consuelo's picture

 

 

So we get roughly 2.5 paragraphs dedicated to slamming those who speak of the Jew thing - Ok, fair enough, let's move on.

However, after spending keystrokes on telling us how the Rothschilds basically ain't nothin, Mr. Smith spends copius keystrokes telling us about all these other (?) elites, but...

NEVER NAMES A GAWD-DAMNED ONE OF THEM...

Name names Dude, or stick a cork in it.  And any credibility you might have had.

 

runningman18's picture

I'm pretty sure Smith was trying to avoid a 30 page long article.  Name names?  Sheesh, go check out the rosters of Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, DARPA, the IMF, the Bank for International Settlements, Davos, all international banks, Skull and Bones, Bohemian Grove and on and on.  A lot of the same people attending same groups, some of them only attending one group.   

Mr Hankey's picture

Yeah.Only (((dozens))) out of thousands.Sounds legit. 

NumbersUsa's picture

Brandon Smith is just another jew supremacist bootlicker crying "there is nothing here, move on"  The classic jew supremacist ploy used over and over again. Their stolen money goes a long long way.

Yen Cross's picture

  Did someone discover Bigfoot scuba diving on a Beaver den, whilst the Polar Bears were looking for scraps?

 

 Still trying to figure out how, a couple of broken English, astards, have ZH accounts 7-8 years old?

  No avatars or history, and suddenly interject ?

 

Ms No's picture

I agree with him on the Hitler trap and people getting primed for zealotry but notice how he criticizes the vagueness and using broad brushes,  then does the same himself by only using the term "Globalists".  Why can't we narrow down involvement in the genesis of the Globalist movement?  If we can't narrow down involvement wont the world be doomed by having the same players coming back at them again and again?  Then he distances what he appears to deem high proof of globalist involvement, CFR membership, with "financial elites" by mutliple paragraphs. See how he did that?  Who are the financial elites?  Then notice that he speaks of Israel and US funded terrorists being such great harm to Israel and Zionism.  Where the hell is that happening?  Talk about claims of clowns...  He also claims that the Alt-right blames all of the Jewish faith when that is a frame job worthy of the MSM.

"Those who argue that all our ills are engineered by "the jeeeewwws!" or "the tribe" are poorly informed and have chosen an overly simplistic broad-brush explanation for a much more complex enemy they have no ability to fathom. They tend to cite "evidence" that is highly unverified and poorly sourced.  They think the Rothschilds are the root of all globalism when the Rothschilds are just one element of a greater cabal.  Ask them which globalist institutions actually argue for Jewish or Zionist supremacy and they won't be able to produce evidence of any, unlike the numerous globalist institutions and champions that OPENLY argue for GLOBALISM even at the expense of Jews and the nation of Israel [where is this expense that you speak of?] (i.e. Barack Obama's consistent support of Islamic extremist groups and the Arab Spring).  In fact, ask them for evidence that Jews or Zionists are the core of the globalist agenda and they will copy and paste the same list of perhaps two dozen Council on Foreign Relations members that are Jewish while ignoring the thousands of other members that are not."

NumbersUsa's picture

Come on ms no, if you are trying to suggest that these "ignoring the thousands of other members that are not." are not completely in the hands of the zionist jew supremacists and must follow their direction/agenda or be eliminated, then you are cleverly misinforming your intended audience.

LA_Goldbug's picture

They are fully in our face (jews) but I must admit that I have no clue what the percentages are of distinct members in the Global Power Fight Club.

LA_Goldbug's picture

I see that your eye caught the same "small details" that I noticed in this article. Something tells that the author received a request to write a "lighting discharge" article for the Tribe. It might work for the nubies on the block but I doubt it will change the hardliners position.

Most of ZH-ers who write more than 3 sentences in their comments for the most part are aware that the Tribe is not "The Power Structure" running the show. My suspicions is that they are a very significant component in it.

quintus.sertorius's picture

"While a minority of globalists are associated with the political extremist faction known as "Zionism," Zionists are just another exploitable group to them, and their greater objective has nothing to do with the elevation of Israel. They will gladly fund Islamic extremist groups, for example, that desire and will willingly carry out the obliteration of Israel or the murder of Jewish people."

 

You are not a Zionist agent, Brandon, but you are wrong, dead wrong, about depreciating the significant role of Zionism to globalism. If Zionism didn't exist, if Israel as an oppressive, colonial, apartheid ethnocracy didn't exist, yes, there certainly would still be a globalist faction in the world. But it wouldn't be as strong, motivated, successful and uncompromising as it has been thus far. As one Rabbi recently said - I agree with him, the Jewish people are a catalyst, a catalyst for change. Change for good; or change for evil. Your suggestion that the globalists would gladly obliterate Israel if it served their interests is an old exercise in utterly groundless speculation: sixty years of history, since the creation of the State of Israel through the Balfour Declaration (dedicated, yes, to the Rothschilds - they are not the only globalists obviously, but their significance as a synecdoche for the globalists retains some validity) has seen the power of Zionism grow, not shrink, receiving a considerable boost from the aftermath of 911. Half of all US foreign aid goes to Israel. This is not cherrypicking, it's a fact. The Office of Special Plans (spearheaded by Douglas Feith), which led to the invasion of Iraq, was not some vague globalist organization: it was first and foremost a Zionist group. The recent enactment of anti-BDS laws in North America and countries in Western Europe is a testament to the superlative power of the Zionist lobby. The Western Media is overwhelmingly partial to Zionist views, not simply globalist views. This Zionist lobby is not separate from the globalist faction: though certainly not all globalist elites are Zionist, the Zionist component is strong enough to impact the collective decisions the globalists make. Speculating that globalists would obliterate Israel if it served their interests is a shoddy and manipulative thesis à la Alex Jones: global trends, for the past 60 years, show the exact opposite. The Zionist faction within globalism definitely protects their baby Israel and it will continue to be this way as long as the instrumentalized United States holds onto its global hegemony.

Seychelles's picture

Thank you for fleshing out these significant details.

Ms No's picture

"Without a basic understanding of how lies are utilized, you will be in no position to grasp the complexities of disinformation trends being implemented today."

Indeed... we certainly know that you understand this.