CalPERS Slashes Pension Payments To Retirees In Two More California Towns By Up To 90%

Tyler Durden's picture

While we've yet to experience any large municipal pension failures, which is just a matter of 'when' rather than 'if', the small pension failures sprinkled across the state of California are starting to pile up.  As The Sacremento Bee points out today, public workers in Trinity and Imperial counties are just the latest to have their pensions slashed by up to 90% as their cities admit what most of us have known for some time, namely that they're running ponzi schemes which simply don't have the funding required to payout the benefits they've promised. 

Trinity County Waterworks District No. 1 west of Redding and Niland Sanitary District from Imperial County are in line to become the third and fourth government agencies to break with CalPERS over the past 12 months in a manner that shortchanges their retirees.


The CalPERS Board of Administration is scheduled next week to vote on ending contracts with the two small districts because they’re in default.


In Trinity, five current and former employees will see their promised pensions slashed by 70 percent. Niland’s five beneficiaries will see a 92 percent to 100 percent cut in pension benefits, according to CalPERS’ staff reports.


To fully fund their workers’ pensions, the two districts would have to muster up hefty termination fees. CalPERS asks for that money up front, and then moves the separating agency to a low-risk fund called the terminated agency pool.


CalPERS says Niland owes about $200,000 to cover the long-term costs of its employees’ pensions in the terminated agency pool, while Trinity owes some $1.6 million. Trinity has asked CalPERS for a 30-year, no-interest payment plan to cover the termination fee, but the district and the pension fund have not reached a deal, according to CalPERS.



Of course, as mentioned above, these pension cuts will impact a tiny number of retirees but that is all the more telling as elected officials are only willing to admit to their ponzi schemes in instances where the political carnage can be 'managed'...certainly a handful of people here and there are 'expendable.'

As you may recall, last October we wrote about the unfortunate situation in Loyalton, California whereby CalPERS was threatening to slash pension payments to a group of retired city workers after their City Council members failed to understand basic pension accounting and the unintended consequences of terminating their plan (see "Pension Benefits In Tiny California Town To Be Slashed As "Ponzi Scheme" Is Exposed").  That was followed by retirees of the East San Gabriel Valley Human Services Consortium getting similar cuts after their former municipal employer failed to pay their pension dues.

But her former employer, East San Gabriel Valley Human Services Consortium, left a $406,027 unpaid bill to the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, which manages benefits for 3,000 local governments and districts. As Calpers, the nation’s largest public pension, deals with a growing gap between what’s been promised and what’s been set aside, it may slash the checks of Lynch and 190 other workers by 63 percent -- the rate by which the agency has fallen short.


"We were always told that it was set in stone. Now to find out that’s not true -- is the sky blue? Is water wet?" Lynch, who lives in a 1994 motor home, said of her pension. "We’ve paid 100 percent of our responsibility into it. I just don’t understand how they can come along and cut so much out."

Of course, while they try to lay it off, CalPERS certainly deserves a healthy portion of the blame here as they've been willing participants in perpetuating one of the largest public pension ponzi schemes in the country for years now.  Just last December we noted CalPERS' decision to only modestly decrease their discount rate by 50 bps, a move which their finance committee chairman all but admitted was politically motivated to allow "municipalities and other government agencies some breathing room" rather than lower it to where it should be and take the risk of bankrupting half of the state of California.  Here's what we wrote:

A few weeks ago we asked whether CalPERS would rely on sound financial judgement and math to set their rate of return expectations going forward or whether they would cave to political pressure to maintain artificially high return hurdles that
they'll never meet but help to maintain their ponzi scheme a little longer
(see "CalPERS Weighs Pros/Cons Of Setting Reasonable Return Targets Vs. Maintaining Ponzi Scheme").  The decision faced by CALPERS was whether their long-term assumed rate of return on assets should be lowered from the current 7.5% down to a more reasonable 6%.  Well, we now have our answer and it seems the board erred on the side of maintaining the ponzi with a decision to reduce the fund's discount rate by only 50 bps, to 7%, to be phased in over 3 years.


Of course, this decision should come as little surprise to our readers as we concluded our previous post with the following prediction:


We've seen this battle between math/logic and politicians played out numerous times in states all across the country.  Somehow we suspect that "math/logic" will continue to lose...better to bury your head in the sand for a couple of more years and pretend there is no problem.


Meanwhile, Richard Costigan, chairman of the CalPERS finance committee, who owed that "this is just a start," more or less admits that the decision was politically motivated to allow "municipalities and other government agencies some breathing room before they absorb the impact."



Of course, while CalPERS is the largest public pension in the U.S. it's certainly not the worst off from a financial perspective (yes, we're talking about you Illinois).  In fact, there is roughly $2 trillion in total underfunded state and local pension liabilities around the country.



That said, the situation looks even more dire if you adjust that underfunding amount to reflect an appropriate discount rate rather than the 7.5% "dream rate" that CalPERS and most of America's other pension ponzis use.  In fact, we recently took a stab at calculating the real taxpayer liability outstanding to America's public pensions and found it to be closer to $5 - $8 trillion (see "An Unsolvable Math Problem: Public Pensions Are Underfunded By As Much As $8 Trillion").

We decided to take a look at what would happen if all federal, state and local pension plans decided to heed the advice of Mr. Gross. As one might suspect, the results are not pleasant.  We conservatively assume that public pensions are currently $2.0 trillion underfunded ($4.5 trillion of assets for $6.5 trillion of liabilities) even though we've seen estimates that suggest $3.5 trillion or more might be more appropriate.  We then adjusted the return on asset assumption down from the 7.5% used by most pensions to the 4.0% suggested by Mr. Gross and found that true public pension underfunding could be closer to $5.5 trillion, or over 2.5x more than current estimates.  Others have suggested that returns should be closer to risk-free rates which would imply an even more draconian $8.4 trillion underfunding.


  Pension Underfudning

But we can kick this can down the road for a while feel free to keep buying stocks irrespective of how close valuation multiples get to infinity.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
zuuma's picture


Just means the payment went from $500,000 a year to $50,000.

Still $49,000 too much.

public employee parasites.

toady's picture


Promises promises....

hedgeless_horseman's picture


Does the P in CALPERS stand for Ponzi?

NoDebt's picture

Aaaaaaaaaanddddd it's gonna keep going like this for 20 more years.  .gov pensions running up on the rocks, slashing benefits, raising taxes, etc.  Should be about one a week going belly up from here out.

"You fucked up.  You trusted us."



BuddyEffed's picture

There are no known natural laws in the universe that cover a concept of pensions.

Laws of nature like gravity and the speed of light are set in stone. But most everything else is squishy.

Creepy_Azz_Crackaah's picture

This is what you voted for, CA gubmint employees. Just keep voting that way.

Stuck on Zero's picture

I can't wait till they see a rate of return on investments go to something like -60%.  Guess they'll just have to raise taxes till everyone is homeless and penniless.

new game's picture

maff man, maff. gotta get some...

Rabidcephalopod's picture

Didn't you hear? In The People's Republic of Kalifornia, algebra is a civil rights problem and maff is rayciss 'n sheeit. Or so certain state agency heads believe anyway. Kalifornia is so stoopid, and we are so screwed...

sodbuster's picture

"If something's hard for me, it must not be worth doing!"  Homer Simpson

peopledontwanttruth's picture

I don't think we have 20 months yet alone years

Antifaschistische's picture

what's all this fussing about....when .gov has to start paying 12% int on all their debt, the pension funds can keep their expected rate of return lower and play catch up.   problem solved.   Now...what will 12% do to .gov?  it'll all be good.

Five Star's picture

The Pension underfunding of every state given realistic market values in terms of state revenues:


847328_3527's picture
$200,000 Lifeguards to Receive Millions in Retirement


Newport Beach, California, where some lifeguards have compensation packages that exceed $200,000 and where these "civil servants" can retire with lucrative government pensions at age 50.$200,000-lifeguards-to-receive-millions-in-retirement-n947640


Yes we can!


oDumbo's picture

Don't forget the firemen in Orange County that make over $300k per year as well as pensions at about half that amount each year until death.  I wonder how many dishes you have to wash to pay each fireman pension per day... probably takes the marginal contribution of 5,000 dishwashers per day to pay the daily pension for just one fireman.  The dumocrap party is a farce, a cancer and according to the laws of physics, will bring us all down.  Next time a dumocrap sticks it to you because you're right or white, let them know how you feel about government pensions, the jewel of the dumocrap party.

Rabidcephalopod's picture

That's absolutely BRILLIANT! I knew I should have stayed in CA and taken that job with Newport Beach back in the 80's...

Bes's picture

so are we for or against fucking over people in retirement?

meanwhile fat cats are about to get tax cuts galore

and the MIC is booming?

just checking...


Bay of Pigs's picture

No, against the public unions that deliberately and willfully fuck over taxpayers.

Got it now?

shocktherapy's picture

Like this one 

The International Union of Police Associations

Donald Trump was endorsed by the nation's largest police union 

or this 


Representing more than 240,000 professional fire fighters and emergency medical personnel in the United States and Canada.


It does not get any better than this

Why These Union Members and Lifelong Democrats Are Voting Trump
aPocketofResistance's picture

Many of these people were not in unions and simply took a job with a pay and benefit package, that they paid into their entire career. Got it now, you dumb fuckwad?

studfinder's picture

Not here in Wisconsin.  Many pensioners paid not a dime into their pensions and some are earning more retired then they did most of their career.  Many pensions are based off top 3 (or 5?) earning years.  Work a crap ton of overtime a few years and it pays off for the rest of your life.  The inflated stock market and taxpayers are the funders of these things.  Retire at 50..let the state pick up your spending tab the rest of your life.  Not a bad gig.  Too bad taxpayers are running out and the stock market is rigged and about ready to collapse.

1033eruth's picture

There has to be two parties to reach an agreement.  So its not just the public unions.  Its the elected backstabbers that perpetually give in to the unions under the guise of "compromise".  Unions ask for the moon and settle on something less which is still far more than private sector is getting in COLAs.  Elected backstabbers always agree because then those union members are guartanteed votes.  

Public unions will urge their members to always vote for the backstabber and they do because they know where there bread is buttered.

ejmoosa's picture

Government people you mean, right?  And in California?

You surely know how most of us taxpayers are going to answer, right?

847328_3527's picture

"Things like pension cuts happen in a Big Utopian State like California. People are just going to have to get used to it."



BuddyEffed's picture

For or against?

There are no known natural laws in the universe that cover a concept of pensions.

And their are no natural laws covering the concept of tax cuts or even taxes for that matter neither.

Justin Case's picture

The U.S. Government is corrupt! The U.S. Government is committing fiscal and accounting fraud by operating with Cash Accounting rather than the proper GAAP Accounting and as a result is not appropriately funding the U.S. Government benefit promises that it has made to the U.S. general public! The U.S. Government has undertaxed the U.S. upper class by $106.9 Trillion and deferred $106.9 Trillion of public liabilities (US Unfunded Liabilities (GAAP)) to the future Americans.

Can you opt out of Gov't pension? Uh Uh. Pesion deduction is just another tax that you won't get back. Ah glad we are in a democracy, but the rich love it even moar.

The U.S. Government has borrowed $106.9 Trillion from the future Americans and given it to the U.S. upper class! This is fraud! This is corruption! This is grand larceny! The senior U.S. Government officials are common criminals!



Squid Viscous's picture

but they had such stressful jobs,

sorting and filing papers, and all that overtime.

Justin Case's picture

Our erected Gov't officials here in Canada can collect their pension after 5yrs of service. Their pension per month is equivelent to the maximum a retiree gets per year. We keep voting in people, that's the problem here. People need to stop voting for the best liars, and they're all liars. I was forced to pay into the system for 42 years, so at 60 I can get $640.00/mth. at 65 a whole $1600.00/mth. I don't know what I'll do with all that money.

Thethingreenline's picture

Get real sonny,
Very few pensioners getting 500 g's, that's just nonsense!

Blankenstein's picture

Take note - Thethingreenline only shows up here when there is a pension article.  

HalinCA's picture

Yeah, but he's an economics expert, and a former starting NCAA starting guard to boot!

torabora's picture

Drop a zero and you're close to the truth.

Lumberjack's picture

California lawmakers just voted to go 100% renewable moments ago.

What needs to be done is making it illegal to use carbon offsets where other baseload generation is concerned, and, no importing electricity from other states that do not have that 100% mandate and/or use carbon offsets.

Welcome to crippling electric bills. We will not subsidize you anymore. California...the new India.

stacking12321's picture

i'd almost feel sorry for them, if it weren't for the fact that they are government workers.

shocktherapy's picture

The higher IQ people have no idea how bad this is going to be for them

This publication describes retirement benefits and formulas for state safety members. “State safety” members are individuals employed by the state who are involved in law enforcement, fire suppression, the protection of public safety, or who are employed in a position designated by law as “state safety.” 

Offthebeach's picture



Too funny. 


( Actually anyone who's been to a motor vehicle paper palace, and seen these mouth breathers struggle figure out which of two forms to honor you with....well, it probably does seem like hard work to them.)

Syrin's picture

BUT BUT BUT !!   The evil REPUBLICANS are gonna take away your pension!!   Ignorant fuck tards deserve this.

We Are The Priests's picture

...and, And, AND, Nancy is warning that they're coming to put you all into concentration camps, too.

Cynicles II's picture

Nothing unlimited free healthcare for all illegals can't fix.

GunnerySgtHartman's picture

More proof that the only person who cares about your retirement is you.  Not companies, not investment banks, and certainly not politicians.

We Are The Priests's picture

Certainly you're not suggesting that personal responsibility is something the people should be troubling themselves with, right?

drendebe10's picture

I dont get no stinkin pension so fukemall

Justin Case's picture

They need to change the plan.

If an individual earns over $1 million a year they are not eligible for pension benefits, but must contribute. Over $1 million in assets, not elegible either. Revision to Government officials, their pension is calculated same as the sheeple and not elegible to collect untill 65 yrs of age. Introduce the option to be in a pension, like Gov't plans, or opt out. Opting out, makes you unelegible for any benefits and no deductions. The CEO of Generous Motors earn's a base $16 million salary per year. Jamie Diamon $53 million/yr base.

jamesmmu's picture
Grand Delusion: Our Entire Economic Recovery Is Nothing But A Potemkin Village Erected By Yellen, Wall Street, Spineless Politicians, Corrupt Government Apparatchiks, And Fake News Media Corporations.

Bigly's picture

Too bad, so sad.

This is coming to a municipality near you.

Broke is broke.


wisehiney's picture

You fagtifa pussies are gonna get dogshit beaten out of you when these pissed off cops realize that y'all are the only ones around to take it out on.

We Are The Priests's picture

Now this is what we call a "comforting thought."