Media: Islamic Faith Prevents Sexual Assault

TDB's picture

Via The Daily Bell

The propaganda machine is firing on all cylinders. Harvey Weinstein must have pissed someone off to be sacrificed by the elite. Perhaps it was a religious sacrifice of sorts. One arm of the propaganda machine is pushing the idea that adherence to the Islamic religion can prevent sexual assaults and oppression against women.

The media is now running stories which claim that the Islamic religion pre-empts abuse of women, by providing a set of moral rules for men to follow. The Independent ran an article called How the teachings of Islam could help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals.

The author, a Muslim, says that government laws are not enough, because they only punish after an incident has occurred, as opposed to stopping it beforehand. But by listening to the prophet Muhammad, men will follow a code of conduct apparently out of fear of reprisal from Allah.

This is where Islamic teachings and Prophet Muhammad’s example provide a solution that no state truly can…

Chapter 4:35 furthermore prevents violence against women by forcing men to control themselves and never resort to physically harming women– preempting physical abuse.

The Quran further obliges men to provide for a woman’s every financial need, while holding that anything a woman earns is hers alone – preempting financial abuse.

What the Quran actually says, just before the Chapter he cites, in chapter 4:34 is:

Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, as God has given some of them an advantage over others, and because they spend out of their wealth. The good women are obedient, guarding what God would have them guard. As for those from whom you fear disloyalty, admonish them, and abandon them in their beds, then strike them.

That doesn’t exactly sound like it preempts abuse of women. It sounds like a suspicious husband is allowed to beat his wife, according to the Quran. It sounds like a man provides for his women because she is basically his property, his responsibility, like a farm animal.

So the teachings of Islam really view women as dependent on men, saying that God created men with an advantage over women.

But the author goes on to say Muhammad saw men and women as equals under the law.

…on numerous occasions Prophet Muhammad punished an accused rapist on the testimony of the rape survivor alone.

That must be where modern colleges get their inspiration. It is not uncommon for men to be expelled from universities on an unproven accusation of sexual assault.

So in this sense, Muhammad stood up for women, in the same way, modern progressives ignore the whole “innocent until proven guilty” thing.

But Muhammad also didn’t care much about objective truth when it came to punishing women either. All he required was four male witnesses, and a woman could be placed under house arrest for the remainder of her life.

Those of your women who commit lewdness, you must have four witnesses against them, from among you. If they testify, confine them to the homes until death claims them, or God makes a way for them.

And maybe Muhammad was lenient towards female victims, but according to Islamic law, four male witnesses are also required to punish a rapist. And if a woman accuses a man of rape, and it is not “proven” by four witnesses, she just admitted to adultery.

Up until 2015, women in predominantly Muslim Sudan were sometimes prosecuted for adultery when they came forward with rape allegations.

And ISIS soldiers have been widely reported to rape female prisoners. Some claim it is in the process of converting them to Islam.

The whole idea that the Islamic faith offers any sort of example for how to treat women is absurd.

And yet the progressive media still pushes the idea that this religion promotes peace and equality. Why? Why do they ignore the murder and punishment of gay men by Muslim governments? Why do they ignore the mistreatment of women in majority Muslim countries?

It is all part of a campaign of misinformation about the religion. It happens, ironically, while the same people demonize Christian religions. But in the New Testament of the Bible, which Christians are supposed to follow instead of the Old Testament, there really are no violent teachings.

When people brought an adulteress to Jesus, he told said to them, you who is without sin, cast the first stone.

When Muhammad heard of an adulteress:

He went to her in the morning and she made a confession. And Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) made pronouncement about her and she was stoned to death. (Sahih Muslim 4209)

Jesus really did preach peace and equality. Muhammad did not.

(For a great comparison of Christianity and Islam, check out MUSLIM: What You Need to Know About the World’s Fastest Growing Religion)

Let’s take a look at the example set by Muhammad.

The Hadith is a collection of Muhammad’s teaching. Hadith Muslim Book 8 section 3433 recounts how after a military victory Allah actually sent down a command that it was okay to rape the female captives in front of their husbands. The soldiers were worried about raping married women since that would be adultery. But their God made a special exception. Slave women are fine to rape, whatever the circumstances.

War seems to have been one of Muhammed’s favorite hobbies. And part of the payment to his soldiers was the captive women, taken as slaves. In Hadith Bhakari Book 34 section 432, some of Muhammad’s soldiers are worried about impregnating their slaves when they rape them. Muhammad told them not to worry because Allah wouldn’t allow a woman to get pregnant if he didn’t want her to have a baby.

Here’s another gem, from Book 8 of Muslim, section 3371:

We went out with Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (May peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

The article from the Independent sought to weave a pro-Islam brainwashing into a piece which repeated the same things that the media usually says: we live in a rape culture.

If we live in a rape culture, it is because the government teaches people that consent is not required.

And from what we can tell, the religion is Islam certainly does not preach consent.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Ban KKiller's picture

Islam is filth practiced by a cult of perverts and the weak.


No Burka for me, bitchez! For once can you people get over your dicks? Behind every bribe is a prick and grant it, a fool behind it that makes the rest of us pay for it. How about we all just grow up?

valjoux7750's picture

I had to stop reading after first paragraph, what a fucking joke. Wtf is wrong with these people!  And who's the stupid fucker who says " ok let's try that"

Is-Be's picture

The three trees are from the same root, Monotheism.

All an invasive weed.

Our ancient law was explicit. A female relied on her brothers for protection. They were expected to act on her behalf. For them not to act was dishonerable.

And if she had no male relatives, then the entire tribe had to enact justice.

Yes, this did lead to bloody feuds, but the consequences of abusing your wife or any female were horrendous.

All women and children were protected by our Goddesses.

logicalman's picture

There are evil people.

They are not religion-specific

They are not race-specific

Decent people need to stand up against them.

Trouble is the evil people control almost everything and use the sleople against those who are awake.

Nature is not arranged for the weak to thrive and the strong to submit but cooperation can do amazing things.


oneno's picture

The Quran, edited by Omar, was selected by Abu Bakr, Omar, and Othman in place of the very first Quran compiled by Hazarat Ali. Upon rejection of Hazarat Ali's Quran, Hazarat Ali retracted his Quran and said to the effect that "you will never see this Quran ever again".

Hence the Qurans in circulation today, whether Sunni or Shia, are not the first Quran compiled by Hazarat Ali from the original skins prepared while Prophet Mohammed was alive.

Had that original Quran been in circulation today, there would be no Sunni/Shia split and there would be no controversy as Hazarat Ali was the living Quran.

The Hadith is not the Quran dictated to Prophet Mohammed by the angel Gabriel.

There is only one Shia Imam today who claims a direct lineage to Hazarat Ali as living Imam

In addition, the Spirit Teaching brought to Earth by the Prophets is now available via Billy Meier who will bring this teaching to mankind over the next 800 years.

History and all legislation is by the victors. The Holy Quran is a book of faith where there cannot be compulsion. Hence Sharia Law is being imposed unlawfully.

The renewed non-religious Spirit Teaching requires reason and intellect above belief and ignorance.

All problems facing mankind have their root in over-population as there is only enough space for 529 million humans on planet Earth for optimal spiritual and consciousness-based evolution. Hence the Spirit Teaching to bring man into balance with nature.

NoDebt's picture

"In addition, the Spirit Teaching brought to Earth by the Prophets is now available via Billy Meier who will bring this teaching to mankind over the next 800 years."

I don't think we've got that kind of time, man.  Doing something positive in the next 5 years would be helpful.



Hongcha's picture

Mohammed never claimed to be Jesus.  He led a band of raiders doing what they had done for centuries ... prey on weaker caravans.

The West is squeamish and Western men would do well to examine the true source of power.  Hint: it's not derived from being nice to weak people.

Nature is not arranged for the weak to thrive and the strong to submit.  But that is what we were taught from infancy.

medium giraffe's picture

"Hint: it's not derived from being nice to weak people."

This is why people continue to vilify Machiavelli when all he actually did was point this out.

alexcojones's picture

Was this written in Swedish? Sound sort of Swede to me.

GunnyG's picture

Unless you're a goat, a donkey, or a nine year old boy/girl.

Voice of insanity's picture

"The Independent ran an article called How the teachings of Islam could help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals."

Maybe they should preach that to the Muslims.....

Salzburg1756's picture



You need pre-kindergarten.

Dolar in a vortex's picture

The Independent is hard left of the New York Times.

Need to hear anymore?

And they wonder why England is so fooct.