The First Amendment Is Under Serious Assault In Order To Stifle Anti-Israel Boycotts

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

Assaults on freedom speech can be found in many aspects of American life these days, but one specific area that isn’t getting the attention it deserves relates to boycotts against Israel.

Increasingly, we’re seeing various regional governments requiring citizens to agree to what essentially amounts to a loyalty pledge to a foreign government in order to participate in or receive government services.

I’m going to highlight two troubling examples of this, both covered by Israeli paper Haaretz. The first relates to Kansas.

From the article, In America, the Right to Boycott Israel Is Under Threat:

The First Amendment squarely protects the right to boycott. Lately, though, a legislative assault on that right has been spreading through the United States –  designed to stamp out constitutionally protected boycotts of Israel…

 

Over the past several years, state and federal legislatures have considered dozens of bills, and in some cases passed laws, in direct violation of this important ruling. These bills and laws vary in numerous respects, but they share a common goal of scaring people away people from participating in boycotts meant to protest Israeli government policies, including what are known as Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns.

 

Today, the ACLU filed a lawsuit challenging one of those laws — a Kansas statute requiring state contractors to sign a statement certifying that they do not boycott Israel, including boycotts of companies profiting off settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories.

 

We are representing a veteran math teacher and trainer from Kansas who was told she would need to sign the certification statement in order to participate in a state program training other math teachers. Our client is a member of the Mennonite Church USA. In response to calls for boycott by the church and members of her congregation, she has decided not to buy consumer goods and services offered by Israeli companies and international companies operating in Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories. Our client is boycotting to protest the Israeli government’s treatment of Palestinians and to pressure the government to change its policies.

 

Earlier this year, our client was selected to participate as a contractor in a statewide training program run by the Kansas Department of Education. She was excited to use her skills to help train math teachers throughout the state, but when she was presented with a form requiring her to certify that she “is not currently engaged in a boycott of Israel,” she told the state that she could not sign the form in good conscience. As a result, the state refuses to let her participate in the program.

 

Kansas’s law, and others like it, violates the Constitution. The First Amendment prohibits the government from suppressing one side of a public debate. That means it cannot impose ideological litmus tests or loyalty oaths as a condition on hiring or contracting.

If this was the only example of such behavior, I suppose we could dismiss it as a one-off, misguided directive. Unfortunately, this sort of thing is far more common than any of us would like to admit.

Here’s another recent example, from the article, Houston Suburb Won’t Give Hurricane Relief to Anyone Who Boycotts Israel:

A Houston suburb will not approve grants to repair homes or businesses damaged in Hurricane Harvey if the applicant supports boycotting Israel.

 

The city of Dickinson’s application form for storm damage repair funding includes a clause stating that “By executing this Agreement below, the Applicant verifies that the Applicant: (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of this Agreement.”

No other clauses about political affiliations or beliefs are included in the form.

 

The state of Texas passed a law in May banning state entities from contracting with businesses that boycott Israel. The law, one of 21 passed in states around the country in the past few years, has been criticized by the American Civil Liberties Union as unconstitutional.

This is totally insane. I don’t care what you think about Israel, the above is completely unacceptable in a free society and we should all be making a stink about it. Please share with friends and family.

*  *  *

If you liked this article and enjoy my work, consider becoming a monthly Patron, or visit our Support Page to show your appreciation for independent content creators.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Parrotile's picture

Interesting (and of course rather disturbing).

 

Also, why now? "Someone" planning ahead perhaps (more involvement in Palestine)? 

 

Or, something rather more substantial? Planning to extend "Land Ownership" further afield perhaps?

Infinite QE's picture

Iraq and Syria have certainly been softened up by trillions of US military expenditure and slaughter. So perhaps the Greater Israel real esate brochures are being passed around the world jewish community.

Mtnrunnr's picture

You seemed pretty okay with it when it involved demonstrations against Trump. Your hypocrisy only enables them to take away your rights.

Infinite QE's picture

Seagrams on the menu tonight?

Mr. Kwikky's picture
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”


Voltaire

New_Meat's picture

"the RIGHT to boycott"?

Yep, it is around the good and plenty clause, I think before it.

- Ned

{Saul smiles from below}

InsaneBane's picture

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.

Today no war has been declared--and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

 

-JFK, 

The President and the Press: Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961
God Emperor's picture

Plebs should rather boycott Hollywood jews not Israel.

Israel goods and services sold to US are peanuts compared to the $ moved by (((Hollywood)))

Meanwhile..the best about Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales comes not from the movie but from the leaks:

Pirates of the Caribbean’s Kaya Scodelario Leaked Nudes

http://celebrity-leaks.com/pirates-of-the-caribbeans-kaya-scodelario-lea...


InsaneBane's picture

JFK and many others were killed by the same zionist force in our country, they use silent weapons for quiet wars.

 

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

J S Bach's picture

"This is totally insane. I don’t care what you think about Israel, the above is completely unacceptable in a free society and we should all be making a stink about it."

Well, I DO care what you think about Israel, because - as Shakespeare wrote - "Ay, there's the rub".

(((They))) and their diasporic cousins are the pathogens which give fever to the body of planet Earth.  Unless and until we send out our white blood cells to destroy this bacillus, they will surely dull the knife of God's cutting edge of Creation if not kill it off entirely.

God Emperor's picture

Only the White Blood Cells know how to deal with this pest.

Hail !

A. Boaty's picture

I usually avoid medical metaphors like the plague.

Mr Hankey's picture

Ducy passed similar law in the Land of McBane ..gov& retired. gov dotards vote in MIC & .gov circumcised cocksuckers EVERY.SINGLE.TIME.

J S Bach's picture

Uh... Whaaaaa?   Sir, you need a nice cold glass of ice water.  Come back to the keyboard in a few hours and retype that last comment.

Mr Hankey's picture

Um,lots of retired MIC in Airheadzona? Current .gov & MIC?Tend to vote   pro      cut-dick? Seriously, you couldn't discern any of that in spite of my admittedly fucked-up prose?Re-read the subject.

Salzburg1756's picture

JSB, you are so right.

There can be no compromise.

They all got to go.

CheapBastard's picture

Which side do the football players take a knee on here?

Déjà view's picture

"Which side"...Soros coaching BLUE team...Adelson RED team...BLITZ !

Gov. Greg Abbott flew to Israel Saturday on a plane belonging to Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino owner and megadonor active in Republican national politics.
A spokesman for the governor confirmed that Abbott flew on Adelson’s 737 after Jewish Insider and The Dallas Morning News first reported it Monday.
Adelson is a top spender in Republican politics known for his fierce support of Israel and his friendship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Abbott met with Netanyahu in Jerusalem on Monday to discuss the Texas-Israeli relationship and reiterate Abbott’s opposition to Iran — a nation whose relationship with Israel has long been tense.
http://www.star-telegram.com/news/state/texas/article55442970.html
It was discussed with the prime minister, as well as other leaders in Israel,” Abbott said. “… I made very clear to the prime minister that he has no greater ally on the globe than Texas.”
http://tjpnews.com/texas-gov-abbott-talks-business-alliance-with-israel-...

LightBulb18's picture

The law over not helping people who boycott Israel does appear to violate my concept of freedom for sure, and I don't like stopping people from boycotting either as A peaceful form of protest. But I have additional questions that I noticed you didn't ask, would it be acceptable for the american government to boycott iran or north korea? Would most americans support the boycott of nazi's, or would that have different rules associated with it. Also I think you would have more legitimacy if you included some big picture considerations, like Israel is A small nation of A small people the Jews, if A sizable percentage of americans boycotted products from Israel, I imagine that most of the companies that sold them may stop doing so in favor of companies from nations who are not boycotted, unless they were medical supplies. If most nations at the united nations voted to force white gentiles to pay reparations for their inhumane ways, which they claimed no matter how much evidence existed against the claim, would not white people break with the majority consent and attempt to support other white gentile nations? Just like white gentiles, Jews cannot control how much money they are able to make, or how unequal we are. We can boycott nations, watch as their economies collapse and buy up their companies for pennies on the dollar, but that’s cruel and would only increase anger towards Jews, which would only lead to pointless fighting, because there is no way for nations in the world to live as separatists, in A world with nuclear weapons and plenty of brown people who are to dishonest for the truth about white gentile inequality, or Jewish inequality, and too bitter and willing to behave immorally in order to force their right to make white gentiles not influence their nations, and to force them to give them back the money that they stole from brown people that made them be unequal in the first place. That is exactly what many white gentiles also believe about the Jews. Money is influence, it already bought the right to influence the media, the immigration policy and the rest. I guess where I am ending up is that freedom doesn’t appear to work to avoid setting A precedent that will harm your country in the long run, and the majority or even the righteous and rational minority simply has to stand up for what’s right. I remind you that gun control as you want it will not survive majority rule in America, neither will white free speech, even if you call it white free speech, and point out that’s obviously discriminatory. Just like Jews cant call the shots because they don’t make up A majority, or have free speech without getting robbed in America, or Israel if A majority of gentiles is able to rob Jews in Israel. They will do the same to white gentiles for sure. They did it to south Africa, and now thousands of south africans have been murdered and assaulted because of it, and billions of dollars of productivity have been destroyed for decades. Can you put up A sign that you boycott black nations due to their violent behaviors towards non blacks? Or boycott muslim support of the conquest of Israel and the violation of equal rights for Jews as dhimi (second class citizens)? Racism against Jews is massive, unresolved, and is good for America to stand up to. I don’t think you can pretend that America will allow you to boycott arab muslims or africans, so only saying freedom in relation to Jews is discrimination and more evil because they aren’t violent, and earned their money despite tremendous racism. In G-d I trust.

MEFOBILLS's picture

Here is a Rabbi explaining "the rub" in clear language.  The Jewish intervewer is stunned to hear the truth from one of his own.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=159601

detached.amusement's picture

what you may consider dulling, is ((their)) idea of sharpening - and its all been promised to ((them)) by their (("god")) with whom they have a covenant - and dont expect a usurped story from a couple millenia ago to have much worth when you wind up praying to your enemy, who you think is your ((friend.))

(the colloquial you, of course, I am not assuming you JS are a christian or muslim.  but there's enough of them out there whose ancestors were converted by the sword)

 

the depth of lies is deeper than people imagine

 

its going to be quite a task to kill off yhvh, but I'm up for the challenge. 

 

if only I could find a box of Roddy's special glasses for yall....(but I wont treat you all like louis gosset jr and beat you up just to wear them)

Akzed's picture

its going to be quite a task to kill off yhvh, but I'm up for the challenge.

So was Marcion. Good luck.

Tallest Skil's picture

Nah, we’ll boycott both, thanks. One’s committing genocide on a tiny group, the other is committing genocide on MY group.

Bay of Pigs's picture

JFK gave that speech ten days after the Bay of Pigs fiasco.

I know that because I was born on that day.

jin187's picture

What about our right to boycott the corrupt and broken healthcare industry? Or our right to boycott gubmint edumacashun?

The government forces us to buy shit from people we don't want to buy from all the time. Not only are they not forcing you to buy anything from Israel, all they require is a claim that you don't refuse to do so out of spite. Sounds like an expansion of our rights to me. First time the government has ever asked nicely for you to spend money on something only if you want it.

Tallest Skil's picture

>>What about our right to boycott the corrupt and broken healthcare industry?

Thanks, (((Social Security))) and related “services”!

>Or our right to boycott gubmint edumacashun?

Thanks, (((Common Core)))!

What’s your point, kiddo?

>Not only are they not forcing you to buy anything from Israel

Uh, they are, in fact. It is illegal to boycott Israel in the United States. You know nothing.

>all they require is a claim that you don't refuse to do so out of spite.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH “SPITE” HHAHAHAAHAHHAHAH Eat shit, you motherfucking puppet. I have the right to not do business with anyone I choose. Neck yourself.

>>Sounds like an expansion of our rights to me.

Holy shit, the doublespeak is real.

>>only if you want it.

The exact opposite is happening.

Akzed's picture

Very diabolical, meaning satanic, John 8:44-45; Rev. 2:9; 3:9.

 

The Wizard's picture

“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

Exactly what I was thinking. Short and to the point

Barney Fife's picture

Yah. No one could be that intentionally obtuse on purpose so it’s either the sauce or it’s organic.

newdoobie's picture

Is this like the laws against communism back during the "Red Scare"?

bertimusx's picture

The Anti Boycott virtually Guarantees its Success.

DjangoCat's picture

Wow, no comments yet.  I am down with this.  Totally unacceptable.

There was another story about a bill proposed in Congress recently which would impose both civil and criminal penalties against citizens supporting an Israeli boycott.  The sponsors of the bill were not aware of the penalties proposed, up to $1MM in fines and some jail time on the criminal side.  NOT AWARE OF THE PENALTIES.

I doubt they had even read the bill.  Just following orders.

 

Normalcy Bias's picture

Read the Bill?

Why, that would get in the way of fundraising, insider trading, arranging cash bribes, screwing a vast array of donor provided prostitutes, and pretending to give a fuck about one's constituents!

jin187's picture

You have to pass the bill to find out what's in it.

This is why we need Nancy Pelosi to stay in congress, although she disagrees. According to her, the reason we need her to stay is because she has a vagina. Or a bat cave. Take your pick.

LetThemEatRand's picture

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to [boycott]."  -Voltaire (original was "criticize," which is equally true)

nightwish's picture

The jews are no different than hitler was in terms of totalitarianism, except they spread out oversight using political goy straw men, legal threats, media propaganda and agitrop in entertainment. I excuse most of  hitler's efforts because he was for strength of sovereignty and for his hatred for bolshevism that threatened to enslave every nation on earth. He failed and look where we are now, if we resist our J overlords we pay a hefty price. No other race on earth enjoys these privaleges. 

I want out of this fucked up simulation.

Ms No's picture

We all know that Marx was a Jew and created a revolutionary doctrine that led to at least a hundred million people killed.  It would be one thing if they turned against it but no, they like the results and they back it and infiltrate with it to this day.

We can all see that this system is here now and the wheels are turning.  I just listened to some historians discussing the real fatality numbers of the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution and they will never fully know.  Zero credible historians deny the primary role of Jewish people, or that it was entirely their movement.  It was way over twenty million though.  It was probably at least 25 million and it couldn't have been lower than 22.  One way to look at it is that they slaughtered about a million human beings a year, plus.  It's a damn industrial slaughter machine. 

If people think this exact same system with the same bankers behind it all wont do that to us they are serious mental handicaps.  I would somewhat understand it if it was just a system of conquering but there is real hatred and malice behind it that defies explanation.  Could they be holding a grudge against us from the ancient past of something?  What the hell did any of us ever do but give them sanctuary, a place to prosper, and dying to protect their illegal stolen state?  What did Russia ever do to them? 

You know damn well that they will slaughter us like pigs anyway, just like a Palestinian.  They are the creators of Communism.  Their cultural Marxist groups are working on us from every angle as we speak.  They have even shot our police officers.  Soros is bringing waves of government paid terrorists in to the entire west.  Those western backed terrorists raped, tortured and pillaged tiny children in Syria.  Israel is pleased with it.  Those people didn't do shit to anybody either.  There are a half million dead in Iraq, Russia is scared, the Ukraine went down, 500 people just got murdered by an op in Vegas to disarm us...  If people think they wont gut us like fish they are shitting themselves and they need to take a gander at where Marxism always leads.  The free shit equality utopia ends up with starving people nailed to barns with their guts on the floor.  They are here and they is no doubt.  If people aren't afraid it's because they are stupid.

 

07564111's picture

^^^^ Yep, this exactly..We are cattle and we are expendable.

nightwish's picture

+1000. They've corrupted the history books as well, a fact most everyone these days isn't aware of. Anything casting them in a negative light has either been tweaked or suppressed. Its as if the devil himself looks out for their interests. Why not? They single handedly perpetuate significant evils like no other group on earth can.

jin187's picture

I suppose you're right. Your posting here about our evil Jewish overlords is certainly why you are paying the price. Looks like another year at [burger joint name] with no raise for you.

Tallest Skil's picture

Hi, paid shill! Kill yourself before we get our hands on you or you’re going to wish you’d died in the soviet gulags you love so much.

Akzed's picture

Look what Google provides as results for a search for that quote - https://www.startpage.com/do/dsearch?query=voltaire+if+you+want+to+know+....

Apparently only white supremacists search for it. Doh!

Infinite QE's picture

The jews will be non-stop on taking away 1st and 2nd amendments rights until they are shown the door or the grave. All else is noise.

LetThemEatRand's picture

This is not about religion.  Note that the ACLU, which includes a whole bunch of Jews, is challenging the law.  I don't see any Christian church groups filing suit even though they have the money to fund lawyers.   And I certainly don't think of Kansas as being a hotbed of Judaism.

Zionism is the problem, not Judaism.

Infinite QE's picture

Judaism=zionism=talmudism=bolshevism=communism

 

All else is noise.